• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Come on, man.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

Consistently wrong since 2002

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

Bark louder, little dog.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

The revolution will be supervised.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

White supremacy is terrorism.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / The New FDA

The New FDA

by John Cole|  May 9, 20075:22 pm| 16 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Given the cynical political manipulation of the FDA’s decisions over the past few years, it is hard to greet this as a victory:

By a vote of 93 to 1, the Senate passed a bill this afternoon that gives the Food and Drug Administration sweeping new power to police drug safety, order changes in drug labels, and restrict the use and distribution of medicines found to pose serious risks to consumers.

The bill calls for a fundamental change in the philosophy and operations of the F.D.A., requiring the agency to focus on the entire life cycle of a drug — not just the years prior to its approval, but also the experience of patients who later take it.

Senators said the bill was a response to a widespread loss of confidence in the ability of the F.D.A. to protect consumers against the dangers of drugs like Vioxx, a popular painkiller withdrawn from the market in 2004. The bill would carry out many recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences and appears broadly acceptable to the House. The Bush administration has not actively opposed the measure and many drug manufacturers support it.

The bill is widely seen as “must pass” legislation because it renews authority for the government to collect fees from drug companies to speed the review of their products. Without action by Congress, the authority would expire Sept. 30.

The cardinal rule for me is that anytime a bill receives complete bipartisan support, it is universally a bad thing. The possibility for further politicization and mayhem appears to be overwhelming.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The End of Giuliani
Next Post: Et Tu, Romney? »

Reader Interactions

16Comments

  1. 1.

    Fledermaus

    May 9, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    The cardinal rule for me is that anytime a bill receives complete bipartisan support, it is universally a bad thing.

    See also “Bankruptcy Reform”

  2. 2.

    CJ

    May 9, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    The first thing the FDA will do with this new power is to stop all importation of drugs from Canada, Europe, etc. While I have heard allegations that some folks are receiving placebos or the wrong prescription from abroad, I feel fairly certain that protection will extend a bit beyond consumers, i.e. to the profit margins of drug companies.
    Anyone got a reason for me to lighten up?

    CJ

  3. 3.

    Dreggas

    May 9, 2007 at 5:39 pm

    The cardinal rule for me is that anytime a bill receives complete bipartisan support, it is universally a bad thing. The possibility for further politicization and mayhem appears to be overwhelming.

    Agreed but at the same time with some of the side effects some of these drugs have had (ie death) the government should have a vested interest in monitoring these drugs because the drug companies won’t do it themselves.

  4. 4.

    sidereal

    May 9, 2007 at 5:45 pm

    The cardinal rule for me is that anytime a bill receives complete bipartisan support, it is universally a bad thing

    So say we all.

  5. 5.

    Zifnab

    May 9, 2007 at 5:56 pm

    The cardinal rule for me is that anytime a bill receives complete bipartisan support, it is universally a bad thing. The possibility for further politicization and mayhem appears to be overwhelming.

    See: The Patriot Act

    Yeah, I always like to see a little diehard opposition from the other side of the aisle before I’m “for” a bill. Clearly a great many palms were greased to get this to run through so quickly.

    Hell, I haven’t even heard about this legislation before today so it makes me super, double, extra suspicious.

  6. 6.

    Dreggas

    May 9, 2007 at 6:04 pm

    Senators said the bill was a response to a widespread loss of confidence in the ability of the F.D.A. to protect consumers against the dangers of drugs like Vioxx, a popular painkiller withdrawn from the market in 2004. The bill would carry out many recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences and appears broadly acceptable to the House. The Bush administration has not actively opposed the measure and many drug manufacturers support it.

    While there is something to be said for being up front and welcoming regulation if you have nothing to hide there is something fishy if the Drug Co’s themselves welcome it…

  7. 7.

    The Other Steve

    May 9, 2007 at 6:32 pm

    While there is something to be said for being up front and welcoming regulation if you have nothing to hide there is something fishy if the Drug Co’s themselves welcome it…

    Not at all.

    Regulation creates a barrier to entry for smaller competitors.

    You can call this the Pfizer, Merck, Eli Lilly Marketplace Protection Act.

  8. 8.

    DougJ

    May 9, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    The cardinal rule for me is that anytime a bill receives complete bipartisan support

    I like it. Call it the anti-Broder axiom.

  9. 9.

    jake

    May 9, 2007 at 7:40 pm

    The bill is widely seen as “must pass” legislation because it renews authority for the government to collect fees from drug companies to speed the review of their products.

    In my neck of the woods we call this a “Bribe,” ‘tho older folks call it a “Recipe for Disaster.”

    How’s that for cynical?

  10. 10.

    Krista

    May 10, 2007 at 6:42 am

    it renews authority for the government to collect fees from drug companies to speed the review of their products.

    They do have some cheek, don’t they? It’s one thing for the government to take bribes. It’s quite another for them to be so bold-faced as to actually write it into legislation.

  11. 11.

    Decided FenceSitter

    May 10, 2007 at 7:27 am

    Now to add a bit more info from NPR, this ability has been around since 1992; basically Drug Companies could throw money at the FDA to hire more reviewers so that their drugs could get reviewed faster. This was an increase in the fees so that the FDA could track drugs after market.

    Not so much paying money to get fast tracked, but paying extra money to get augmentees to review the drug.

  12. 12.

    Paul L.

    May 10, 2007 at 8:40 am

    The cardinal rule for me is that anytime a bill receives complete bipartisan support, it is universally a bad thing. The possibility for further politicization and mayhem appears to be overwhelming.

    I nominate the DMCA.

  13. 13.

    BIRDZILLA

    May 10, 2007 at 8:50 am

    Figures these dummycrats still want to expand the powers of one of the goverments most out of touch depts

  14. 14.

    Zifnab

    May 10, 2007 at 9:06 am

    Figures these dummycrats still want to expand the powers of one of the goverments most out of touch depts

    When the Senate is weighted 93 Democrats to 1 Republican, that will be a bad day for… well… how much is everyone – 93?

  15. 15.

    Hyperion

    May 10, 2007 at 9:23 am

    BIRDZILLA Says:

    Figures these dummycrats still want to expand the powers of one of the goverments most out of touch depts

    a BIRDZILLA post without CAPS and with only one misspelling?
    what is the world coming to?

  16. 16.

    annie's granny

    May 10, 2007 at 9:34 am

    While I have heard allegations that some folks are receiving placebos or the wrong prescription from abroad, I feel fairly certain that protection will extend a bit beyond consumers, i.e. to the profit margins of drug companies.

    I’ve never understood what’s being alleged here. Are they saying that furriners are selling us placebos and keeping the good Lipitor for themselves? Because that would imply that either international pharmacies have more balls than brains or that American consumers are dumb enough to buy their maintenance meds at CrazyRaoulsDiscountDrugs.lu. Or do they actually think that there’s a difference between European and American Lunesta?

    The reality is that most prescription medications are produced outside of the US (Puerto Rico and Ireland, for example, are both homes to multiple major US Pharmaceutical manufacturing plants) and the big difference between Dutch Lotrel and Kentucky Lotrel is the language on the insert.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • TS on Well-Earned Schadenfreude Open Thread: C U Next Tuesday, Fer Realz (Mar 31, 2023 @ 11:36pm)
  • West of the Rockies on Well-Earned Schadenfreude Open Thread: C U Next Tuesday, Fer Realz (Mar 31, 2023 @ 11:34pm)
  • Subsole on Well-Earned Schadenfreude Open Thread: C U Next Tuesday, Fer Realz (Mar 31, 2023 @ 11:34pm)
  • scav on Well-Earned Schadenfreude Open Thread: C U Next Tuesday, Fer Realz (Mar 31, 2023 @ 11:33pm)
  • bbleh on Well-Earned Schadenfreude Open Thread: C U Next Tuesday, Fer Realz (Mar 31, 2023 @ 11:30pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!