• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

GOP baffled that ‘we don’t care if you die’ is not a winning slogan.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

White supremacy is terrorism.

The arc of the moral universe doesn’t bend itself. it’s up to us.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

I’m more Christian than these people and I’m an atheist.

“And when the Committee says to “report your income,” that could mean anything!

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Relentless negativity is not a sign that you are more realistic.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

We still have time to mess this up!

I desperately hope that, yet again, I am wrong.

Glad to see john eastman going through some things.

No one could have predicted…

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Profiles In Courage

Profiles In Courage

by Tim F|  June 6, 20077:38 am| 12 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

The House Ethics Committee has taken the brave step of opening an investigation into Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA), one day after the DOJ indicted him. I wonder whether these people could be any more useless. Anybody who calls that a step up from Republican-led Committees who slept through the DeLay and Cunningham meltdowns entirely has dangerously low expectations. Ethics Committees exist to cut off corrupt behavior before it metastasizes into a DeLay/Cunningham/Jefferson embarassment, not to add a meaningless censure after the DOJ has already done their work for them.

Further, it will profoundly disappoint me if pro-Jefferson lobbying from the Congressional Black Caucus, which includes Democratic committee chairwoman Stephanie Tubbs-Jones, contributed to stalling the inquiry. The CBC has enough credibility problems (FOX debate) that it hardly needs the kind of blow that will come from shielding the most flagrantly corrupt House member since “Duke” Cunningham’s bribe menu.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « British Still Waiting For Reciprocity
Next Post: Alternative Power Plant Is A Double Waste »

Reader Interactions

12Comments

  1. 1.

    Robert A. Becker

    June 6, 2007 at 8:41 am

    Well, on Rep. Jefferson’s expulsion from the House because of his indictment, we disagree. You overlook, I think, an important point: he was elected to that office by the people of his district [and re-elected after he was under investigation for corruption]. I think his re-election was unfortunate. As a three-decade former resident of Louisiana, I had had enough of Mr. Jefferson long ago and I think he’s about as ethically straight as a corkscrew. Nevertheless he was elected to that office by the people of his district. And that fact should not be ignored, nor should the wishes of the voters of his district be lightly cast aside.

    Once he became the target of investigation, he was asked by the Democratic leadership to step down from the powerful Ways and Means committee. He refused, and was removed by the House Democratic leadership. Now that he’s been indicted, he’s asked to be relieved of has remaining relatively minor committee assignment, and that’s been done.

    But unless or until he pleads guilty to a crime, or is convicted of one, it would be wrong to overturn the judgment of the voters who recently returned him to office and to expell him from the House.

  2. 2.

    demimondian

    June 6, 2007 at 8:43 am

    There was no investigation going? That’s insane!

    What’s the current excuse for that? I can understand the Republicans not wanting to investigate Jefferson, since they felt he’d make such an awesome member for their caucus. (And they appear to have been right, although perhaps not for the reasons they originally imagined.) But why didn’t the Dems investigate him?

  3. 3.

    Sock Puppet of the Great Satan

    June 6, 2007 at 8:50 am

    “The House Ethics Committee has taken the brave step of opening an investigation into Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA), one day after the DOJ indicted him.”

    As you’re the lawyer, John, is it possible that the ethics committee waited so it didn’t interfere with an ongoing grand jury investigation?

  4. 4.

    Cyrus

    June 6, 2007 at 9:23 am

    I wonder whether these people could be any more useless. Anybody who calls that a step up from Republican-led Committees who slept through the DeLay and Cunningham meltdowns has dangerously low expectations.

    Well, back when Jefferson’s freezer was news, I remember concern trolls and open Republicans arguing that Jefferson proved that the Democrats weren’t any better than Republicans after all. Pelosi hadn’t had him stripped of his seat, had she? She’s just as willing to tolerate corruption as the Republicans! Um, not really. In fact, not at all. The Democratic leadership stripped him of his committee assignment. I don’t think they have the power to impeach a Congressman. The voters sent him back, and even that, only in a runoff vote. What else were Democrats supposed to do?

    Ethics Committees exist to cut off corrupt behavior before it metastasizes into a DeLay/Cunningham/Jefferson embarassment, not to add a meaningless censure after the DOJ has already done their work for them.

    Yes, but by the time Democrats could do anything about Jefferson, he already had metastatized.

    This is indeed a step up from the Republican handling of Jefferson, or of corruption in general. A small step up, certainly, I have no illusions about that, and I agree with you that the CBC deserves some/most of the blame for the fact that it was so little. But there is the step.

  5. 5.

    Tim F.

    June 6, 2007 at 9:27 am

    Well, on Rep. Jefferson’s expulsion from the House because of his indictment, we disagree.

    Are you replying to some other post? The House Ethics Committee doesn’t just expel members from the House. There are many levels of censure which it uses to formally declare that someone has screwed up. Censuring him now just looks like they had to be dragged kicking and screaming to acknowledge the obvious.

  6. 6.

    Belae

    June 6, 2007 at 9:47 am

    One point need to be made, with the corrupt Justice Department scandal, one can not set the bar so low as to expel member base on indictment alone; less bushie US attorney would start bringing fails indictments against Democratic members. However Jefferson is a special case with freezer full of cash and all.
    Ethic committee should started an investigation long ago. One reason i support an outside independent investigation group for the ethic committee that can determine and recommend if committee to start an investigation.

    Belae

  7. 7.

    Rome Again

    June 6, 2007 at 10:02 am

    It’s not about ethics, it’s about job security, dammit. We can’t let the poor congresspeople suffer joblessness now, can we?

  8. 8.

    Andrew

    June 6, 2007 at 11:34 am

    Remember, folks, a big reason that this case has taken so long is Abu’s DoJ totally fucked up on the Congressional office raids, leading to a multi-month delay while evidence that had been collected was held under seal.

  9. 9.

    Rome Again

    June 6, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    Remember, folks, a big reason that this case has taken so long is Abu’s DoJ totally fucked up on the Congressional office raids, leading to a multi-month delay while evidence that had been collected was held under seal.

    That’s a good point, thanks for reminding us.

  10. 10.

    demimondian

    June 6, 2007 at 12:12 pm

    Not a bit of it. The Congressional office raids were actually handled correctly, which is why the courts supported them.

    Sorry — the question stands. Why didn’t the Ethics committee pick this up?

  11. 11.

    Andrew

    June 6, 2007 at 12:22 pm

    Not a bit of it. The Congressional office raids were actually handled correctly, which is why the courts supported them.

    Legal is not the same thing as handled intelligently.

    The point is that they were handled in such as way as to guarantee that the issue ended up in the courts

  12. 12.

    Pb

    June 6, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    Anybody who calls that a step up from Republican-led Committees who slept through the DeLay and Cunningham meltdowns entirely has dangerously low expectations.

    Anybody who doesn’t call that a step up has a horribly bad memory:

    More recently, during the rise of Tom DeLay and Jack Abramoff, there was pressure on the Ethics Committee to take action to admonish members involved in their activities. However, action was slow and blame pointed to then-Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert. When the Committee did admonish Tom DeLay for a third time, Hastert fired the Chairman and two other Republican members who voted for the admonishment. Without a quorum, the Committee could not take further action against DeLay or other members involved in that scandal or others.

    And while we’re on the subject, does anyone remember this, for example? Yeah, if it weren’t for those darned Democrats dragging their feet, always nannering on about ‘ethics reform’ and ‘corruption’, maybe we’d see some real action on… oh wait.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Sister Golden Bear on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:36pm)
  • SiubhanDuinne on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:34pm)
  • sab on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:33pm)
  • Jay on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:32pm)
  • Leto on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:32pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!