• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Let’s finish the job.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

‘Museums aren’t America’s attic for its racist shit.’

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

A consequence of cucumbers

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Democrats have delivered the Square Deal, the New Deal, the Fair Deal, and now… the Big Joe Biden Deal.

Republican also-rans: four mules fighting over a turnip.

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

“And when the Committee says to “report your income,” that could mean anything!

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

When you’re in more danger from the IDF than from Russian shelling, that’s really bad.

Fight for a just cause, love your fellow man, live a good life.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Republicans can’t even be trusted with their own money.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / War / Trouble In Anbar

Trouble In Anbar

by Tim F|  September 13, 20078:56 am| 18 Comments

This post is in: War

FacebookTweetEmail

Al Qaeda in Iraq may well be more paper tiger than existential threat, but apparently not every cell got the memo:

A key Sunni ally of the US and Iraqi governments has been killed in a bomb attack in the city of Ramadi, Iraqi state television has reported.

Abdul Sattar Abu Risha was the leader of an alliance of Sunni Arab tribes that opposed al-Qaeda.

We need to deal with the fact that America’s power in Iraq has peaked more or less for good. The Petraeus drawdown plan has nothing to do with “meeting the Democrats halfway,” it simply reflects the basic fact that we can’t keep this many troops in Iraq much longer. Extrapolating through at least the next one or two presidential administrations there exists exactly zero chance that this level of American force will sit inside Iraq’s borders again. Any change that we hope to accomplish needs to happen right now.

And yet, nothing at all is happening. In today’s example the floor boards just rotted away under that much-ballyhooed oil law. Last month Maliki’s cabinet lost its Sunni representation, before that the Sadrists walked out. Here, at the apex of America’s ability to influence events in Iraq, every meaningful metric trends in the wrong direction. Anybody who seriously thinks that a three-plus deployed, fifteen month tour whack-a-mole force can accomplish what the “surge” forces failed to do, please email me about some blockbuster Tuvalu real estate.

We have brave soldiers giving their lives to the mission and doing honor to their world class training, but we might as well give them buckets and ask them to turn back the tide. In my opinion it dishonors their sacrifice to go on throwing men and resources at a problem that we have long understood cannot be solved with the tools at hand.

***Update***

Jim Henley, in comments:

it could have been a lot of people killed Rishawi – AQI, Sunni tribal rivals, holdout Baathist groups, Shiite militias anxious about the Salvation Council’s influence with the US, or, yes, Iranian intelligence. Until we know more it would be a big mistake to assume anything particular about the perpetrators. The real question is how many of the people in line to kill Rishawi got injured in the explosion.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread
Next Post: Time for Another Resolution »

Reader Interactions

18Comments

  1. 1.

    Wilfred

    September 13, 2007 at 9:14 am

    Interesting, and fishy. Abu Risha was the sheik photographed with Bush when he was in Anbar. I linked to the photo and story at http://abuaardvark.typepad.com/ Really interesting, this.

  2. 2.

    Jim Henley

    September 13, 2007 at 9:36 am

    Tim, it could have been a lot of people killed Rishawi – AQI, Sunni tribal rivals, holdout Baathist groups, Shiite militias anxious about the Salvation Council’s influence with the US, or, yes, Iranian intelligence. Until we know more it would be a big mistake to assume anything particular about the perpetrators. The real question is how many of the people in line to kill Rishawi got injured in the explosion.

  3. 3.

    Ned Raggett

    September 13, 2007 at 9:50 am

    As I posted on my blog, one K. Lopez has some terrible timing today.

  4. 4.

    David

    September 13, 2007 at 10:01 am

    Yep. She came back with the news about 45 minutes after her initial post, albeit with a little angry snark at the messenger… if it’s bad news for the Home Team, then it must have been reported with an agenda, don’cha know.

  5. 5.

    r4d20

    September 13, 2007 at 10:12 am

    Until we know more it would be a big mistake to assume anything particular about the perpetrators.

    Announcing the “prime suspect” is not the same as assuming the identity of the perp.

  6. 6.

    r4d20

    September 13, 2007 at 10:16 am

    Now we will know if this “awakening” is really a grass-roots thing or not.

    If it is then his death wont change much. If not then the Anbar “Awakening” might just be a case of turning over to hit the snooze button.

  7. 7.

    Jim Henley

    September 13, 2007 at 10:17 am

    No, but it may be bad in its own right, r4d20. In this case I think it is.

  8. 8.

    Wilfred

    September 13, 2007 at 10:29 am

    let’s see. Bush goes to Iraq and instead of visiting Baghdad he pops up in Anbar,where poses for photos with Risha that get splashed on the front pages of newspapers all over the Arab world. And Risha gets blown up. We can’t even protect our newest ally who got his picture taken with Bush. Worse than bad, it’s humiliating. It hardly matters who did it.

  9. 9.

    Jay C

    September 13, 2007 at 10:43 am

    “Humiliating”, Wilfred?

    Where you been these past six years? The word doesn’t exist in this Administration’s vocabulary! “Official Spokespersons” will get up and decry this latest atrocity, blame “Al Qaeda”, and pontificate away on how this only proves the need for us to “stay the course” in Iraq – probably for years.

    Good news = reason to “stay the course”. Yay for us!
    Bad news = more reason to “stay the course”. Yay for us!

    Bushspeak 101.

  10. 10.

    Jake

    September 13, 2007 at 10:53 am

    It hardly matters who did it.

    Because it will be used as proof that the soldiers need to stay. Victory!

    Oh no wait, people killed by bombs don’t count as casualties.

    “The standard for recording attacks acts a filter to keep events out of reports and databases,” the report said. “A murder of an Iraqi is not necessarily counted as an attack. If we cannot determine the source of a sectarian attack, that assault does not make it into the database. A roadside bomb or a rocket or mortar attack that doesn’t hurt U.S. personnel doesn’t count.”

    So he’s … not really dead. Victory!

  11. 11.

    capelza

    September 13, 2007 at 11:43 am

    You think Bush will mention this in his speech tonight? I wonder if his writers have had to do some serious revamping of the text?

    That K. Lopez thing is just too funny.

  12. 12.

    Ned Raggett

    September 13, 2007 at 11:43 am

    Talk about looking for the bright side:

    Need we ask how his tribe will react? AQ just took another step toward extinction.

    bdfaith on September 13, 2007 at 12:27 PM

    To quote SpongeBob, “GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!”

  13. 13.

    TenguPhule

    September 13, 2007 at 11:55 am

    Need we ask how his tribe will react? AQ just took another step toward extinction.

    If Al Queda gets any more extinct, they really will rule the world.

  14. 14.

    LITBMueller

    September 13, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    My bet? It was the Iraqi Interior Ministry itself that bombed the Sheik:

    Interior Ministry spokesman Abdul Kareem Khalaf told al-Iraqia state TV that the minister of interior has ordered a monument to be built in memory of the sheik, in addition to naming a police brigade after him and dispatching that brigade to Anbar to assist the council.

    Isn’t that convenient? Kill the head of the organization, declare a state of emergency in Anbar, and send in your own forces to make sure the survivors don’t cause any more trouble.

    The Shiites and the Maliki government feel very threatened by the US support of the Anbar Sunnis. And, stuff like this probably didn’t ease their fears:

    Since achieving success in Anbar, the group announced last month it wanted to extend its reach into Baghdad and the government. It proposed a list of candidates to fill six Cabinet positions vacated in July by the country’s largest Sunni political bloc.

    Speaking in the al-Iraqiya documentary, Abu Reesha said his group was willing to “liberate all the villages near Baghdad … and if the government asks us to participate in cleansing Baghdad that will be a great honor for us and we will respond to the call.”

    The Inerior Ministry is a Shiite-dominated militia in its own right. The recent Jones Report suggested its National Police should be disbanded all together.

    But, just hold on a few minutes and I’m sure we’ll see the Administration and the media blame Iran. Count on it, because blaming Al-Qaeda doesn’t support the Bush/Petraeus Fiction that we’re “winning.”

  15. 15.

    r4d20

    September 13, 2007 at 1:47 pm

    My bet? It was the Iraqi Interior Ministry itself that bombed the Sheik:….Isn’t that convenient? Kill the head of the organization, declare a state of emergency in Anbar, and send in your own forces to make sure the survivors don’t cause any more trouble.

    Interesting…you might be on to something.

    For all the talk of how “many” parties would have wanted to see him dead it seems implausible that equally many would have had the guts to try and kill him. Revenge would be a given so either the killers had HUGE balls or they were part of an organization as strong, or stronger, than the Sheiks.

    Al Queda cannot be ruled out simply by reasoning that it would be stupid for them to do it. OTOH, the central government would also benefit from the death of a potential rogue sunni warlord.

    the minister of interior has ordered a monument to be built in memory of the sheik, in addition to naming a police brigade after him

    LOL. This is exactly the kind of thing I would expect them to do if they were the ones who had him killed.

    In the old days, when the underworld still had something of a “code of honor”, when a mobster was murdered his killers would always come to his funeral and conspicuously show their respect for the deceased. The more ostentatious the display, the more likely the person was involved in the hit.

  16. 16.

    Tsulagi

    September 13, 2007 at 2:18 pm

    Sweet Jesus, you leftards just don’t see the big picture. AQI blowing up this Sunni tribal leader is a good thing. Remember, not long ago these Sunni tribes were sniping and IEDing the shit out of us until they got tired of the holier-than-thou AQI values set. If AQ weren’t there, those Sunni tribes we’re now giving weapons, training, and cash bricks to could resume their old ways. We don’t want that.

    “The standard for recording attacks acts a filter to keep events out of reports and databases,” the report said. “A murder of an Iraqi is not necessarily counted as an attack. If we cannot determine the source of a sectarian attack, that assault does not make it into the database. A roadside bomb or a rocket or mortar attack that doesn’t hurt U.S. personnel doesn’t count.”

    So he’s … not really dead. Victory!

    Good to see at least one moonbat gets it.

  17. 17.

    BruceR

    September 13, 2007 at 6:13 pm

    Wow, that’s the most insane thing I’ve read today, and that’s saying something.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Arguments on War Support « Sake White says:
    September 14, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    […] Take life and death seriously? Maybe LOL. This is exactly the kind of thing I would expect them to do if they were the ones who had him killed.-r4 […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • West of the Rockies on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:05pm)
  • Baud on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:05pm)
  • piratedan on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:04pm)
  • Jackie on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:04pm)
  • schrodingers_cat on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 4:03pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!