• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Everybody saw this coming.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

White supremacy is terrorism.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Find the Missing Word

Find the Missing Word

by John Cole|  October 11, 200710:22 am| 35 Comments

This post is in: Politics, Republican Stupidity, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

Captain Ed, lamenting the “do-nothing” Democratic congress:

Now, given the fact that the Democrats still have not produced a budget, nor have followed through on most of their election pledges except when they squeezed the minimum-wage increase into the funding package George Bush requested for the Iraq war, why should they reduce their work week? With overdue appropriations, one would expect people with their purported tough work ethic to start working through a few weekends to meet fiscal deadlines. Instead, they’re spending their time passing resolutions on genocides in which no current nation took part, which will alienate a strategic ally in a theater of war.

Read the whole ‘analysis,’ and then ask yourself, what key word is missing? I will give you a hint- it starts with “F” and ends with “R.”

Protip- It isn’t “fucker.”

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Let The Tap Dancing Begin in Earnest
Next Post: Paging Cypress Hill »

Reader Interactions

35Comments

  1. 1.

    Tom Gellhaus

    October 11, 2007 at 10:31 am

    Filibuster ! – and I didn’t check the link, I swear.

    (what do I win?)

  2. 2.

    Jess

    October 11, 2007 at 10:31 am

    It’s FIL…something. Darn, I almost had it.

  3. 3.

    Zifnab

    October 11, 2007 at 10:34 am

    Hey, and look, Captain Ed is once again totally full of it.

    But a new Politico analysis finds that this 110th Congress has had more roll call votes this year than any other Congress in history, almost doubling the number under the previous Congress overseen by Boehner and House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL):

    The House last week held its 943rd roll call vote of the year, breaking the previous record of 942 votes, a mark set in 1978. The vote was on a procedural motion related to a mortgage foreclosure bill. When the House adjourned on Oct. 4 for the long weekend, the chamber had reached 948 roll call votes, putting Democrats on pace to easily eclipse 1,000 votes on the House floor in 2007.

    Last year, the Republican controlled House held 543 votes, and for historical comparison, the last time there was a shift in power in Congress, Republicans held 885 roll call votes in 1995. The Senate, which has held 363 votes this year, isn’t on pace to break any records, but has already surpassed the 2006 Senate mark of 279 votes.

    Anybody who’s surprised, raise your hand. Come on. Anybody? Really?

  4. 4.

    August J. Pollak

    October 11, 2007 at 10:37 am

    Well, to be fair, you can’t filibuster in the House. But Democrats have already voted on nearly twice the legislation Republicans did, and they’ve passed student loan reform, a minimum wage increase, and with the greatest bipartisan cooperation in years, they passed the SCHIP renewal… which Bush sadly vetoed.

    So… yeah. What the others were saying about the Admiral being full of crap.

  5. 5.

    John Cole

    October 11, 2007 at 10:39 am

    I was under the impression that Congress contained both the House and the Senate.

  6. 6.

    August J. Pollak

    October 11, 2007 at 10:52 am

    Yes, but Ed’s post is all about Pelosi and the lamentations of house Dems. The Senate filibusters are an equally problematic but separate issue.

  7. 7.

    Pb

    October 11, 2007 at 10:54 am

    the funding package George Bush requested for the Iraq war […] resolutions on genocides in which no current nation took part

    Foreigner?

  8. 8.

    Quackers

    October 11, 2007 at 10:54 am

    I think since the Republicans are now the party of The Endless Threat To Filibuster, why not actually make them do it? Let them start exercising their pie holes 24/7 and use what they have to say in campaign ads against them.

  9. 9.

    canuckistani

    October 11, 2007 at 10:54 am

    What’s wrong with “fucker”? I think it fits in there just fine.

  10. 10.

    RSA

    October 11, 2007 at 10:58 am

    “Firetrucker”.

  11. 11.

    Evinfuilt

    October 11, 2007 at 10:59 am

    I think since the Republicans are now the party of The Endless Threat To Filibuster, why not actually make them do it? Let them start exercising their pie holes 24/7 and use what they have to say in campaign ads against them.

    Thats the worst of it. If they threaten to Filibuster, the Dems cave. The closest thing we’ve seen to a Filibuster this year is the Dems sleep-over stunt, which didn’t work. It make them look like the idiots instead of the real idiots (well actually, I take that back, the spineless Dems are acting like true idiots.)

  12. 12.

    John Cole

    October 11, 2007 at 11:00 am

    Yes, but Ed’s post is all about Pelosi and the lamentations of house Dems. The Senate filibusters are an equally problematic but separate issue.

    And let’s not get into the stuff that was dumped into their laps as the Republicans did nothing for the last few months they were in office. Combined with the oversight catching up, the myriad of current and past problems, the filibuster, and a host of other things (by the way, there is a war going on), and blaming the Democrats, at this point, is partisan gasbaggery.

    If Ed wants them to do more, maybe they should waste less time condemning MoveOn.

  13. 13.

    Ned Raggett

    October 11, 2007 at 11:00 am

    Freeper. Because lord knows we need more of them in Congress.

  14. 14.

    Lee

    October 11, 2007 at 11:05 am

    FlamingGayToeTapper?

  15. 15.

    SDM

    October 11, 2007 at 11:07 am

    Posted as a comment over there, awaiting approval. I wonder if it passes muster…

    “The kicker is that they can’t even blame this one on Bush.
    Well, unless you count the fact that several of their priorities – a war funding bill with a binding timetable, a stem cell research bill, and SCHIP re-authorization – were vetoed by Bush. That’s undeniable.

    “Republicans are blocking legislation” isn’t just a whiny Democratic talking point. It’s true. There is a 60-vote requirement to pass anything in the Senate. This is a strategy designed to make sure Congress does nothing. Some examples:

    Change of Course in Iraq.
    Feb. 5, 2007 Blocked by Republican Senate Caucus.

    Minimum Wage Increase.
    Jan. 24, 2007 Blocked by Republican Senate Caucus.

    Lobbying Reform.
    Jan. 17, 2007 Blocked by Republican Senate Caucus.

    Medicare Price Negotiation.
    April 18, 2007 Blocked by Republican Senate Caucus.

    Greater Rest Periods for U.S. Troops Between Deployments.
    July 11, 2007 Blocked by Republican Senate Caucus.

    Employee Free Choice Act.
    June 26, 2007 Blocked by Republican Senate Caucus.

    Energy Reform.
    June 21, 2007 Blocked by Senate Republican Caucus.

    Intelligence Authorization Bill
    April 17, 2007 Blocked by Senate Republican Caucus.

    Every one a promise made by Democrats in 2006, passed in the House, blocked in the Senate.

    Take credit for blocking a bad agenda! Say, “these were bad bills and we didn’t let them happen.” But to pretend that GOP obstruction is just a talking point, that it doesn’t exist, is silly and misleading.”

  16. 16.

    ThymeZone

    October 11, 2007 at 11:09 am

    If the people want a do-something congress in a time of partisanship, then they need to find a way to give the majority party more than 49 reliable votes in the Senate.

    Otherwise this kind of “commentary” and virtually 100% of punditorrhea and blogorrhea are not only useless, they are toxic and damaging. They obscure the realities of the situation and keep people (the local commentariat is a fine example) happily hyperventilating and doing absolutely nothing to either understand, or ultimately fix, the real problem. The government has been ruined by the party that told you that government was no good. The only remedy you have is more seats in congress for the other party. 2004 was a small step in the right direction. The next, larger step is still needed.

    The rules are set up to prevent tyranny by narrow majority, and it’s damn lucky for us that they are.

    The days of a slim congressional majority finding votes on the other side of the aisle to “get things done” are over, if they ever existed at all. Every member of congress knows that congress is never popular, that all congressional elections are local, and that the people won’t take the time to understand the real dynamics. They will therefore play these games and they don’t give a shit about the public perceptions, and neither would anyone here if they were in one of those seats. Congress is all about the parties, the machines, the caucuses and — first, last and always — the actual vote counts on any given measure.

    Nothing.Else.Matters. Maybe it’s hard for a blog that was spawned from the world of perception and theater to understand a world that does not operate, at its core, on perception and theater? What goes on in the hallways in front of the cameras is all for your amusement. What goes on on the floor is about that graph at WaMo.

    If you want the theater to actually mean anything, you have to make it relevant to the graph. Right now, it isn’t.

  17. 17.

    jnfr

    October 11, 2007 at 11:19 am

    TZ links to the graph I was also thinking of, which was orginally produced by McClatchy. The time series tells the story.

    I’ve always thought the Dems need to force a filibuster to really be a filibuster. None of this “gentleman’s agreement” shit.

  18. 18.

    Zifnab

    October 11, 2007 at 11:26 am

    If the people want a do-something congress in a time of partisanship, then they need to find a way to give the majority party more than 49 reliable votes in the Senate.

    TZ, we’re totally agreeing here. Filibusters are bad when you are the majority party. The only way to break a barage of filibusters is to get 67 reliable votes. That said, even if we doubled the number of Senate Seats we claimed last year, that would only give us a 62 seat majority. Five shy of filibuster-breaking. Republicans can still, potentially, bottle up Congress well past ’09.

    Johnson broke the Civil Rights Filibuster back in ’67 by effectively cutting off federal funding to southern states. He starved the Senators until they caved. I don’t know if that will work in ’09, when Republicans feel like they have nothing to lose by letting their states suffer. The Dems need to get smarter, and they need to pro-actively start hunting for ways to break the filibusters they should know are coming.

    Unfortunately, when you’ve got turn-coats like the DINOs that supported the MoveOn condemnation, its questionable whether you can even get those 62 Senators to vote reliably. But just because the situation is difficult doesn’t mean the constituency will accept failure on the part of Dem leadership. Dems want some real victories.

  19. 19.

    Face

    October 11, 2007 at 11:33 am

    I was under the impression that Congress contained both the House and the Senate.

    Stupid moonbat. 9/11 changed everything.

  20. 20.

    Sojourner

    October 11, 2007 at 11:33 am

    If the people want a do-something congress in a time of partisanship, then they need to find a way to give the majority party more than 49 reliable votes in the Senate.

    Absolutely. How else can you keep Harry Reid, the Republican minority leader, from putting forward legislation legalizing warrantless wiretapping on the American people, condemning MoveOn for a newspaper ad, and supporting Bush’s laying the groundwork for attacking Iran by calling the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization?

  21. 21.

    jnfr

    October 11, 2007 at 11:35 am

    Gaaah! The Dems so need to find some balls.

  22. 22.

    ThymeZone

    October 11, 2007 at 11:37 am

    Johnson broke the Civil Rights Filibuster back in ‘67 by effectively cutting off federal funding to southern states.

    Good point. I detested the man as president, but as a legislator, he was truly a force to be reckoned with, whether you agreed with his agenda or not.

    Progressive advances have, in our history, depended heavily on strong leadership.

    Yes we are agreeing. I hope you find this as scary as I do :)

  23. 23.

    Tim F.

    October 11, 2007 at 11:40 am

    Yes, but Ed’s post is all about Pelosi and the lamentations of house Dems.

    Are you on crack? House Dems passed most of the agenda that they promised in 2006. They laid some eggs (FISA) but overall Pelosi’s record of achievement puts any Republican Congress to shame. Too bad all of her good work dies in the Senate.

  24. 24.

    zzyzx

    October 11, 2007 at 11:55 am

    My favorite spin on the F word is how NRO now casually refers to bills needing 60 votes to pass. It’s not a filibuster; it’s just the no’s winning. Really! They just hope that no one remembers those distant days of Summer 2004 when the filibuster was the worst thing ever created by a legislative body…

  25. 25.

    Peter Johnson

    October 11, 2007 at 11:56 am

    Well, to be fair, you can’t filibuster in the House. But Democrats have already voted on nearly twice the legislation Republicans did, and they’ve passed student loan reform, a minimum wage increase, and with the greatest bipartisan cooperation in years, they passed the SCHIP renewal… which Bush sadly vetoed.

    But they punted on immigration reform. And they’re dragging their heels on Iraq funding. It’s a mixed picture at best.

  26. 26.

    Zifnab

    October 11, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    But they punted on immigration reform. And they’re dragging their heels on Iraq funding. It’s a mixed picture at best.

    It’s all for naught anyway. The legislation gets buried in the Senate or (in the case of Stem Cells, Iraq Timetables, or SCHIP) killed by a veto. And that’s that.

    Immigration Reform wouldn’t have seen any further success. Iraq funding will just get vetoed again and again while the President screams “Support the Troops!” If you want to see legislation get proposed, we’ve got that covered. If you want to see legislation pass, wait till ’09.

  27. 27.

    Tim F.

    October 11, 2007 at 12:11 pm

    Haha, the GOP punted itself on immigration reform. The civil war that destroyed that bill had nothing to do with Pelosi or the Democrats.

  28. 28.

    SDM

    October 11, 2007 at 12:20 pm

    My earlier comment wasn’t approved yet, but I left this one, too:
    “This session, the House has taken rather a lot of genuine, substantive policy votes.

    Here are some of the bills that have passed in the House – leaving aside the many budgetary and supplemental bills that were passed. Most of these drew substantial GOP support. Some of these died in the Senate or were vetoed. Are these bills good policy? Decide on a case-by-case basis. But they’re all substantive legislation.

    9/11 Commission Recommendations

    Minimum Wage

    Stem Cell Research

    Drug Price Negotiation

    Student Debt Relief

    Energy Reform

    Contracting Accountability

    Whistleblower Protection

    Employee Free Choice Act

    Foreign Investment Reform

    Small Business Tax Relief

    Shareholder Rights

    Veterans’ Health Care

    Gulf Coast Housing Relief

    Lobbying Reform

    Housing Reform

    Farm Bill

    College Cost Reduction

    Renewable Energy

    SCHIP

    Fair Pay

    Regional Infrastructure Development

    Small Business Investment

    Iran Counter-proliferation

    Patent Reform

    Does that clear things up?”

  29. 29.

    gex

    October 11, 2007 at 1:35 pm

    Odd how threatening to filibuster absolutely everything tends to prevent legislation from being passed. Who knew?

  30. 30.

    guyermo

    October 11, 2007 at 1:59 pm

    fornicator

    ’nuff said

  31. 31.

    D-Chance.

    October 11, 2007 at 4:45 pm

    Instead, they’re spending their time passing resolutions on genocides in which no current nation took part, which will alienate a strategic ally in a theater of war.

    Not to get off-track, but this little gem keeps popping up. The one about our “strategic ally”, which means Turkey. You know, the country that’s currently amassing soldiers along the Iraq border and ready to flood into the Kurdish region for an all-out war with the ONE section of Iraq that we assumed was stable. THAT strategic ally.

  32. 32.

    Dixie

    October 11, 2007 at 6:06 pm

    So perhaps the f to r word is not relative to Congress but relative to Captain Ed’s column.

    That would make the missing element “factchecker.”

  33. 33.

    Rome Again

    October 11, 2007 at 7:34 pm

    I’m with guyermo, I think fornicator is the right word. ;)

  34. 34.

    SDM

    October 11, 2007 at 8:46 pm

    Incidentally, neither of my comments were approved. Maybe the missing word is “fair.”

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice says:
    October 23, 2007 at 2:17 pm

    […] 3.) Captain Ed, last week pissed off at the do-nothing house, shows his intellectual honesty and consistency by attacking them for wasting time with the failed attempt to censure Pete stark today, is still pissed off at the House, but for different reasons. […]

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • zhena gogolia on Squishable Open Thread (Mar 22, 2023 @ 11:29am)
  • Manyakitty on Squishable Open Thread (Mar 22, 2023 @ 11:29am)
  • Manyakitty on Holy Cow! Breaking News in the Mar-a-Lago Documents Case! (Mar 22, 2023 @ 11:28am)
  • Gin & Tonic on Squishable Open Thread (Mar 22, 2023 @ 11:28am)
  • Barbara on Squishable Open Thread (Mar 22, 2023 @ 11:26am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!