• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

The willow is too close to the house.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

The words do not have to be perfect.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / War / The Full Sanchez

The Full Sanchez

by Tim F|  October 13, 200710:27 am| 43 Comments

This post is in: War

FacebookTweetEmail

Captain Ed is right, Lt. Gen. Sanchez delivered a blistering broadside that covered more than just executive branch Republicans. Congress and the press, whose rocky relationship with Lt. Gen. Sanchez clearly left a bitter taste in his mouth, also get their share of abuse. Read the entire speech here.

When you’re done, browse the extensive list of retired generals who have already put their opinions on record (via).

***Update***

Useful context from Iraq vet John Bruhns.

***Update 2***

Vis email, video of the Sanchez speech.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Someone Draft A Resolution
Next Post: Classical Music Surprisingly Popular With Animals »

Reader Interactions

43Comments

  1. 1.

    Peter Johnson

    October 13, 2007 at 10:32 am

    Tony Snow summed this kind of after-the-fact bellyachinig pretty well I think:

    As a matter of fact, the average Washington memoir ought to be subtitled, “if only they’d listened to me.”

  2. 2.

    Tim F.

    October 13, 2007 at 10:37 am

    Tony Snow summed this kind of after-the-fact bellyachinig pretty well I think:

    Yup, pretty much every senior official starts writing that memoir the day they arrive on the job. And indeed I put far more weight on the opinions of people who accurately warned what would happen ahead of time. Unfortunately, those all happen to be leftist heroes widely derided at the time by neocons and their war-supporting allies. Shinseki comes to mind.

  3. 3.

    whippoorwill

    October 13, 2007 at 10:56 am

    Courtesy of Flopping Aces.

    The man did not deserve a fourth star because his leadership of the armed forces during his time there was terrible. Is it any wonder why he is now talking trash? The surge is working, the situation in Iraq is improving, and now this man wants to portray Iraq as a failure, and blame it all on Bush. It’s not a failure, it’s working. And any good leader understands when a tactic doesn’t work he adapts and changes. Bush understood this and canned Sanchez. After some fits and starts he found Petreaus and the rest is history.

    Let the Swift Boating begin

  4. 4.

    capelza

    October 13, 2007 at 10:58 am

    So Sanchez is a “phony soldier’?

    My cat is less fickle than these two-timing wingnuts.

  5. 5.

    Elvis Elvisberg

    October 13, 2007 at 11:03 am

    After some fits and starts he found Petreaus and the rest is history.

    Right, that’s how we won the occupation. Woooo! We win!!1! SUCK IT ISLAM-O-DHIMMI-CRATS!!1!1!eleven!!

    OK, now that that’s done, let’s start to withdraw, and get everyone out by, say, December 2008.

  6. 6.

    craigie

    October 13, 2007 at 11:04 am

    After some fits and starts he found Petreaus and the rest is history.

    Yes, and those who do not learn from history, are doomed etc…

  7. 7.

    RSA

    October 13, 2007 at 11:09 am

    Is it any wonder why he is now talking trash? The surge is working, the situation in Iraq is improving, and now this man wants to portray Iraq as a failure, and blame it all on Bush.

    Most commentators are satisfied to explain away Monday morning political quarterbacking as being due to bitterness, desire for glory, or the need to boost book sales. It takes a special person to say that after-the-fact criticism is unwarranted because everything is peachy.

  8. 8.

    searp

    October 13, 2007 at 11:24 am

    I personally know several generals that are of the opinion that this war is a disaster. The public sentiments expressed by these generals are, and have been for years, just the tip of the iceberg within the military.

    The real question is when is the right time to speak out and/or resign? What duty is owed the country? Is it better to “work for change” inside? That was pretty clearly a self-serving option with Rumsfeld and Bush in charge, but one that a lot of senior leaders exercised. Is this a dereliction of duty? It is a lot to ask of someone who has to fight a war to also have to make these sorts of decisions.

    However, if Ricardo Sanchez actually feels the way he feels, then my judgment would be he owed the country something more than waiting around to see if he could get his 4th star before retiring and speaking out. Better late than never, but delay kills in this situation, literally.

  9. 9.

    searp

    October 13, 2007 at 11:28 am

    On Iraq is wonderful: I have been there twice this year. It is a hellhole, and no amount of statistical bullshit changes that.

    Those that think it is so wonderful ought to go relieve one of our combat soldiers for a month at, say, FOB Kalsu. I’d be interested in their opinions after they return.

  10. 10.

    CT Voter

    October 13, 2007 at 11:39 am

    The real question is when is the right time to speak out and/or resign? What duty is owed the country?

    Our country hasn’t had any leader willing to set an example by putting the country first, before personal ambition. It’s not surprising that the military is the same.

    While I’m glad retired generals have been speaking out, it’s too little, too late, at this point. We need an active military leader to stand up and point out that the Emperor doesn’t have any clothes, and hasn’t had any, for years.

  11. 11.

    Ivan Renko

    October 13, 2007 at 11:47 am

    We need an active military leader to stand up and point out that the Emperor doesn’t have any clothes, and hasn’t had any, for years.

    Only one small problem with that– even though wwe want someone to hold this accursed administration accountable, doesn’t this constitute insubordination at least– and mutiny at worst?

    Renko

  12. 12.

    Tim F.

    October 13, 2007 at 11:54 am

    doesn’t this constitute insubordination at least—and mutiny at worst?

    Yes. Military commanders either follow orders or they face the men blindfolded. Those who won’t do the job resign.

  13. 13.

    Incertus (Brian)

    October 13, 2007 at 12:06 pm

    I’ll give Ed this much–he didn’t bust out the whole “liberal media” trope in his piece. This is certainly a case of an institution ignoring criticism of itself, as opposed to an ideology doing it.

  14. 14.

    RSA

    October 13, 2007 at 12:08 pm

    Our country hasn’t had any leader willing to set an example by putting the country first, before personal ambition. It’s not surprising that the military is the same.

    I think that for many (if not most) modern politicians, personal ambition and what they think is good for the country go hand in hand. It’s hard to see Giuliani’s campaign in any other light, and Romney even said it explicitly (in connection with his sons). I don’t know military culture, but my understanding is that people take the lead of their superiors both in commands and in philosophy. It could be that high-ranking military people saw what happened with Shinseki and are pushing back (even if not enough) in other ways. The Joint Chiefs of Staff, for example, making statements about Iraq.

  15. 15.

    RSA

    October 13, 2007 at 12:09 pm

    Oops, I meant to say Iran, but also on the surge in Iraq.

  16. 16.

    leefranke

    October 13, 2007 at 12:13 pm

    Only one small problem with that—even though wwe want someone to hold this accursed administration accountable, doesn’t this constitute insubordination at least—and mutiny at worst?

    Actually I think if Congress called them in and started questioning them, they could get away with it.

    If not, they would probably be court-martialed.

  17. 17.

    whippoorwill

    October 13, 2007 at 12:16 pm

    Inceryus says

    I’ll give Ed this much—he didn’t bust out the whole “liberal media” trope in his piece.

    I don’t agree incertus. What I heard Ed trying to do is establish a false equivalence of responsibility for Iraq between dems, the media, and repubs. This will be the meme they will try pound home into the publics mind for the 2008 election. And we shouldn’t let them get by with it.

  18. 18.

    Incertus (Brian)

    October 13, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    What I heard Ed trying to do is establish a false equivalence of responsibility for Iraq between dems, the media, and repubs. This will be the meme they will try pound home into the publics mind for the 2008 election. And we shouldn’t let them get by with it.

    I didn’t see the equivalence you’re talking about, though I didn’t read it all that carefully. But while there isn’t an equivalence between those three groups, there is no doubt that all three groups share responsibility for the Iraq debacle–the Democrats as a party have the least part of that group, since what resistance there was to the war sprung almost wholly from there and left of there. And the media doesn’t get enough criticism for their cheerleading of and providing cover and support for the war as they deserve, no matter if we’re talking about the places that idiots like to refer to as the “liberal media” or the MSM, or even if we throw openly dishonest propaganda organs like Fox News and the rest of the Murdoch empire into the mix. They deserve a much bigger kick in the head than they’ve gotten.

  19. 19.

    CT Voter

    October 13, 2007 at 12:36 pm

    Actually I think if Congress called them in and started questioning them, they could get away with it.

    Yes. And while General Petraeus did manage to candidly admit that he didn’t know whether the war was making America safer when questioned last month, he seems, to me, to personify the strategy of putting personal ambition before what’s best for the country. And, as a reminder:

    A spokesman for General Shinseki, Col. Joe Curtin, said today that the general stood by his estimate. “He was asked a question and he responded with his best military judgment,”

    From February 2003. Yes, Shinseki paid a price. We need someone else to pay a price.

    I think Captain Ed is right on the money with the comments about how traditional mediai is completely omitting any discussion of Sanchez’ blistering critique of said media.

  20. 20.

    The Other Steve

    October 13, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    Wait wait!

    Condleeza Rice declares Unitary Executive is bad for Democracy

  21. 21.

    caustics

    October 13, 2007 at 12:53 pm

    Spinning this as being all about media bias isn’t cool either. Sanchez’s bashing of press coverage isn’t particularly novel or newsworthy at this point. The same tiresome, continuous panty twisting over “teh MSM” can be found on any right wing venue at any hour on any day. It will always serve as a convenient smoke screen.

    That being said, my only question to a newly righteous ex-Bushite would be – are you willing to name names and testify under oath before the American people? If not, you can shove your righteous book deal advance up your ass.

  22. 22.

    Elvis Elvisberg

    October 13, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    Wait a second, have you read what Sanchez actually said?

    It doesn’t make any sense.

    His first complaint is that he was called names in the media– unfortunate, if true– and that “MY EXPERIENCE IS NOT UNIQUE AND WE CAN FIND OTHER EXAMPLES SUCH AS THE TREATMENT OF SECRETARY BROWN DURING KATRINA.”

    Whoa. That’s the best example you have? Brown was criticized because he presided incompetently over a disaster. Was Sanchez going to compare himself to Jeffrey Dahmer or Benedict Arnold or Nero, but decided to water it down?

    Sanchez also points out that stories are chosen for their sensationalistic impact rather than their importance– which is true, as anyone who’s seen wall-to-wall coverage of a car chase or a missing white woman knows.

    But in Iraq, we’re talking about attacks where dozes of people die. This sounds an awful lot like the “the media doesn’t report that we painted a school!” argument that was popular three years ago. I might be misunderstanding which stories he’s talking about, but that’s only because he cites no specifics.

    He writes, “OTHER MAJOR CHALLENGES ARE YOUR WILLINGNESS TO BE MANIPULATED BY “HIGH LEVEL OFFICIALS” WHO LEAK STORIES AND BY LAWYERS WHO USE HYPERBOLE TO STRENGHTEN THEIR ARGUMENTS.”

    Is he talking about Scooter Libby and John Yoo, here? Or what?

    “OVER THE COURSE OF THIS WAR TACTICALLY INSIGNIFICANT EVENTS HAVE BECOME STRATEGIC DEFEATS FOR AMERICA BECAUSE OF THE TREMENDOUS POWER AND IMPACT OF THE MEDIA AND BY EXTENSION YOU THE JOURNALIST. IN MANY CASES THE MEDIA HAS UNJUSTLY DESTROYED THE INDIVIDUAL REPUTATIONS AND CAREERS OF THOSE INVOLVED.”

    Again, what is he talking about? Lyndie England?

    “THE DEATH KNELL OF YOUR ETHICS HAS BEEN ENABLED BY YOUR PARENT ORGANIZATIONS WHO HAVE CHOSEN TO ALIGN THEMSELVES WITH POLITICAL AGENDAS. WHAT IS CLEAR TO ME IS THAT YOU ARE PERPETUATING THE CORROSIVE PARTISAN POLITICS THAT IS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY AND KILLING OUR SERVICEMEMBERS WHO ARE AT WAR.”

    OK, we need some substantiation and some specifics here. Is he saying that GE is part of the military industrial complex? Or that, by reporting when things don’t go well, the media is making soldiers and generals cry and emboldening the terrorists? Or what?

    And given that both parties have gone along with this occupation, and refuse to really do anything about it, I don’t think that “corrosive partisan politics” is really the biggest problem we’re facing.

    “FOR SOME OF YOU, JUST LIKE SOME OF OUR POLITICIANS, THE TRUTH IS OF LITTLE TO NO VALUE IF IT DOES NOT FIT YOUR OWN PRECONCIEVED NOTIONS, BIASES AND AGENDAS.”

    Which agendas? Which notions? Which stories reflect these biases?

    “IT IS ASTOUNDING TO ME WHEN I HEAR THE VEHEMENT DISAGREEMENT WITH THE MILITARY’S FORAYS INTO INFORMATION OPERATIONS THAT SEEK TO DISSEMINATE THE TRUTH AND INFORM THE IRAQI PEOPLE IN ORDER TO COUNTER OUR ENEMY’S BLATANT PROPAGANDA.”

    There, that’s something specific. Almost. Is he upset that programs such as this one are disclosed? That they are criticized? What?

    Given the lack of specifics, it seems to me that he’s upset at the criticism he received, when he knew in his heart that he was really trying. I could be wrong, though. If he opts to substantiate anything he said, we can actually have the discussion he seems to think is necessary.

  23. 23.

    CT Voter

    October 13, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    Spinning this as being all about media bias isn’t cool either.

    I agree. But traditional media has quite a series of sins to answer for. And that needs to be pointed out, repeatedly, so that the authors of the crappy reporting and even worse punditry don’t get let off the hook.

    And I also agree with what Sanchez should do with his book deal, too.

  24. 24.

    Incertus (Brian)

    October 13, 2007 at 1:00 pm

    The same tiresome, continuous panty twisting over “teh MSM” can be found on any right wing venue at any hour on any day. It will always serve as a convenient smoke screen.

    The difference here is that Captain Ed didn’t seem to be saying that this was a traditional case of media bias, i.e. it wasn’t a case of the “MSM” trying to derail a particular right-wing point of view. It’s more a case of ass-covering–Sanchez tore them a new one and they didn’t want anyone to know about it, so they didn’t cover it, and he’s right.

  25. 25.

    whippoorwill

    October 13, 2007 at 1:07 pm

    Incertus

    The only responsibility dems have for the war are those who gave Bush a blank check to wage it. And basically trusting that he [Bush} would let the inspectors complete their mission. That’s not a minor screwup for those who voted yes. But from the 2003 start of the war until Jan 2007 dems had absolutely no power to influence the conduct of the war, which we now know was totally fucked up. Ed and Sanchez are trying to say that dems had an equal effect on the mis-management of the war because they “said” negative things about Bush and all manner of related issues. The same goes for the media who, like you said, were cheer leaders for Bush to invade Iraq, but since then have criticized the actual fighting of the war. My point is after the 2002 election until Jan 2007 dems have no blame for screwing up the strategy and tactics leading to the mess we’re in now. Repubs are going to try and change that in the public mind and Capt. Ed’s post is trying to do just that. Sorry incertus, but I get worked up on this topic. No more blogging for me till Monday.

  26. 26.

    RSA

    October 13, 2007 at 1:07 pm

    I think it’s worthwhile to consider why Sanchez thinks the media have done a bad job on Iraq. He says this:

    All of these challenges combined create a media environment that does a tremendous disservice to America. Over the course of this war tactically insignificant events have become strategic defeats for America because of the tremendous power and impact of the media and by extension you the journalist. In many cases the media has unjustly destroyed the individual reputations and careers of those involved.

    I don’t really know which events and which people he’s talking about. Could he be talking about things like Abu Ghraib, or the Blackwater shootings, or comparable problematic situations? If so, then he’s reading from a different page than I am. The biggest problem with the news media, I think, is in failing to do due diligence in the run-up to the Iraq war, and afterwards. Not a failure to report good news out of Iraq by embedded reporters (which I suspect Sanchez and Captain Ed are thinking about). Sure, it’s self-serving of the media not to report Sanchez’s criticism of them, but on the other hand it’s not entirely obvious to me what he’s criticizing them for, and whether those specific criticisms are justified.

  27. 27.

    CT Voter

    October 13, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    It’s more a case of ass-covering—Sanchez tore them a new one and they didn’t want anyone to know about it, so they didn’t cover it, and he’s right.

    Exactly what I was trying to express. I am a total nonfan of Captain Ed, and, if anything, think that traditional media is traditionally biased to repeat rightwing talking points, but he’s right to point out that no one covering the Sanchez speech is mentioning so much as a syllable about his criticism of the media. If Sanchez is so wildly and paranoidly off base on that, why not point it out, NY Times?

  28. 28.

    rawshark

    October 13, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    Captain is giving you reasons to be dismissive of the article without dissing Sanchez. He’s making the story about the media instead of the criticism of the Bush administration. The jackalope is related to the issue but its still a jackalope.

  29. 29.

    searp

    October 13, 2007 at 1:41 pm

    Sanchez, Franks, somebody should have resigned their commission and told the truth to the public. There, it is simple. Both would have their pensions, both would eventually receive the gratitude of the public for their courage, and both would rest easy in their own minds knowing they did the right thing. At least one of their peers did that, the guy (Eaton?) who was up for a 3rd star and walked away.

    I suspect many of these folks know they let down the country and are projecting. It wasn’t the press that damaged the country. Sanchez correctly diagnosed the real problem: incompetent leadership.

  30. 30.

    Davebo

    October 13, 2007 at 2:01 pm

    Shorter Sanchez

    The media attacked me over some silly pictures in a prison

    The man was incompetent, which makes his crocodile tears over heckuva job Brownie even more hilarious.

    While much of what he says is right, this is just an attempt to revise history. And his reputation.

    And Captian Ed’s complain that the media is hiding this story to cover their ass is laughable as well.

    Retired Gen. Sanchez savages Iraq policy
    Houston Chronicle, United States – 13 hours ago
    Ricardo Sanchez, the former top military commander in Iraq, on Friday delivered a blistering critique of US involvement in the Iraq conflict, …
    Gen. Sanchez assails Bush, others for Iraq ‘nightmare’ USA Today
    White House defends progress in Iraq as ex-commander sees ‘nightmare’ AFP
    ‘No end in sight’ in Iraq, retired general says Los Angeles Times
    San Jose Mercury News
    all 758 news articles

  31. 31.

    Cinderella Ferret

    October 13, 2007 at 2:07 pm

    I just wonder if the Washington press corps will return to the peak of its awesome, but normally dormant potential–much as it did during the Watergate period. The Washington press corps is more interested in access to naked power than its is in the unvarnished truth. Whoa! Is that Representative Z wearing his mother’s panties? Let’s interrupt this report on White House war criminals to bring you an important update on the Rep Z saga.

    The Washington political game is Decadent and Depraved.

  32. 32.

    CT Voter

    October 13, 2007 at 2:23 pm

    Whoa! Is that Representative Z wearing his mother’s panties? Let’s interrupt this report on White House war criminals to bring you an important update on the Rep Z saga.

    Or updates on Britney/Anna/Hannah Montana/lapel pins/frequency of laughter in candidates/prisoners dancing to Michael Jackson/the “hypocrisy” of wealth political candidates trying to do something about poverty/how a political party should have thoroughly investigated the background of a 12 year old boy/mothers who buy assault weapons for their children/blond cute women who are missing….

    If you look at CNN.com, you’d be forgiven if you thought the war was over…

    Hell, coverage of Representative Z is starting to look pretty fine!

  33. 33.

    Bruce Moomaw

    October 13, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    Upon actually reading the speech, it now looks to me as though it consists of:

    (1) Whining about the criticism he got for Abu Ghraib.

    (2) Calling for a draft, without ever quite having the nerve to explicitly use the word. (“AMERICA’S ABILITY TO SUSTAIN A FORCE LEVEL OF 150,000(+) IS NONEXISTENT WITHOUT DRASTIC MEASURES THAT HAVE BEEN POLITICALLY UNACCEPTABLE TO DATE.”) Now, THAT’S courage.

    (3) Urging both US political parties to come together to construct a new international coalition of allies massively militarily involved in Iraq — in some totally unspecified way, possibly by waving a Hogwarts wand.

    (4) Saying that if we DON’T get both a draft and that magical new international alliance, we had better bail out fast. (“GIVEN THE LACK OF A GRAND STRATEGY WE MUST MOVE RAPIDLY TO MINIMIZE THAT FORCE PRESENCE AND ALLOW THE IRAQIS MAXIMUM ABILITY TO EXERCISE THEIR SOVERIEGNTY IN ACHIEVING A SOLUTION.”)

  34. 34.

    caustics

    October 13, 2007 at 2:57 pm

    The difference here is that Captain Ed didn’t seem to be saying that this was a traditional case of media bias, i.e. it wasn’t a case of the “MSM” trying to derail a particular right-wing point of view. It’s more a case of ass-covering—Sanchez tore them a new one and they didn’t want anyone to know about it, so they didn’t cover it, and he’s right.

    You see ass covering. I see a concise emphasis on the noteworthy aspect of the story – a former general previously in charge of the theater of operation saying something that two weeks ago would have been dismissed as MoveOn.org sponsored propaganda. A “phony soldier” if you will.

    And if wingers are so obsessed with the pervasive threat of mainstream media outlets, why don’t they just netroot together in syndicates and buy them all out? After all, they are the “winners” with all the money and the moral high ground.

  35. 35.

    jake

    October 13, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    And any good leader understands when a tactic doesn’t work he adapts and changes would sooner bite his own feet off than make up shit so he can get his war on, so when I say good leader I don’t mean Boosh.

    Fixed.

    After some fits and starts he found Petreaus and the rest is history.

    I guess “fits and starts” is easier to type than “After a full bore fuck up that lasted 4EVA he found a toady who wasn’t to blindingly incompetent and by the way I’m blithely declaring the Iraq war history even though it ain’t over.”

    Jesus (NTZYM) on what planet will we find “fits and starts” applied to a period of several years?

  36. 36.

    Ninerdave

    October 13, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    Wait wait!

    Condleeza Rice declares Unitary Executive is bad for Democracy

    Oh come on ToS, you’re smarter than that! Those guys are pinko commies. That doesn’t apply to the freedom loving Bush admin!

  37. 37.

    Downpuppy

    October 13, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    Both your links went to the same place – the full speech is at http://www.militaryreporters.org/sanchez_101207.html.

    It is an ill wind that blows no good. All the dumping on the press has no specifics that would give it any usefulness. Then, about the war & his attempt to ignore his own massive bag of failure:

    ACHIEVING UNITY OF EFFORT IN IRAQ HAS BEEN ELUSIVE TO DATE PRIMARILY BECAUSE THERE IS NO ENTITY THAT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DIRECT ACTION BY OUR INTERAGENCY.

    Umm – isn’t that the job of Commander Guy?

    Then there’s a ton of utter crap about the need for bipartisanship – Holy Shit, Broderman!

  38. 38.

    TenguPhule

    October 13, 2007 at 9:05 pm

    Sanchez is trying to wipe his own ass clean of the troubles he helped make.

    Fuck him sideways with a broken bottle.

    And Fuck Bush and company when they do the same.

    The buck never stops in this GOP admin, it keeps on running away.

  39. 39.

    Marc

    October 13, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    Someone should start archiving all the praise given to Petraeus from right-wing sources. They’ll turn on him soon enough.

  40. 40.

    Ivan Renko

    October 14, 2007 at 9:14 am

    Someone should start archiving all the praise given to Petraeus from right-wing sources.

    Allah be praised, the intertubes never forget.

    They’ll turn on him soon enough.

    What the intertubes don’t do, all of Wingnutistan will do– they’ll forget the guy even wears an American uniform.

    Renko

  41. 41.

    jcricket

    October 14, 2007 at 4:28 pm

    What the intertubes don’t do, all of Wingnutistan will do—they’ll forget the guy even wears an American uniform.

    And continuing my unbroken record of posting salient 1984 quotes whenever possible:

    “And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. ‘Who controls the past’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'” —pg 32

    Lord help us if the wingnuts ever get control of the Intertubes (or anything like it).

  42. 42.

    LITBMueller

    October 15, 2007 at 8:47 am

    Sorry, John, but the Captain has got it WAY wrong. For instance, he neglects to mention this incredibly stinging line:

    ALL ARE VICTIMS OF THE MASSIVE AGENDA DRIVEN COMPETITION FOR ECONOMIC OR POLITICAL SUPREMACY. THE DEATH KNELL OF YOUR ETHICS HAS BEEN ENABLED BY YOUR PARENT ORGANIZATIONS WHO HAVE CHOSEN TO ALIGN THEMSELVES WITH POLITICAL AGENDAS. WHAT IS CLEAR TO ME IS THAT YOU ARE PERPETUATING THE CORROSIVE PARTISAN POLITICS THAT IS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY AND KILLING OUR SERVICEMEMBERS WHO ARE AT WAR.

    MY ASSESSMENT IS THAT YOUR PROFESSION, TO SOME EXTENT, HAS STRAYED FROM THESE ETHICAL STANDARDS AND ALLOWED EXTERNAL AGENDAS TO MANIPULATE WHAT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC SEES ON TV, WHAT THEY READ IN OUR NEWSPAPERS AND WHAT THEY SEE ON THE WEB. FOR SOME OF YOU, JUST LIKE SOME OF OUR POLITICIANS, THE TRUTH IS OF LITTLE TO NO VALUE IF IT DOES NOT FIT YOUR OWN PRECONCIEVED NOTIONS, BIASES AND AGENDAS.

    If something like that had appeared in Daily Kos, the Cap’n would be calling the author a conspiracy theorist. Sanchez is not blaming “teh left” for Iraq. He is blaming the same incestuous relationship between big business, media, and politicians that many on the left (and within the media) have been decrying for decades now!

    And, Sanchez is NOT saying the media is responsible “for a large part of the problems he sees in Iraq,” as the Cap’n would have it. He’s saying the media’s faults are endangering our own democracy:

    AS I ASSESS VARIOUS MEDIA ENTITIES, SOME ARE UNQUESTIONABLY ENGAGED IN POLITICAL PROPAGANDA THAT IS UNCONTROLLED.

    and

    FINALLY, I WILL LEAVE THIS SUBJECT WITH A QUESTION THAT WE MUST ASK OURSELVES–WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE ETHICAL STANDARDS OF THE PROFESSION IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT OUR DEMOCRACY DOES NOT CONTINUE TO BE THREATENED BY THIS DANGEROUS SHIFT AWAY FROM YOUR SACRED DUTY OF PUBLIC ENLIGHTENMENT?

    More leftist drivel!! heh heh. And THEN Sanchez goes on to criticize the current war effort.

    Sanchez is basically saying “you assholes have it all wrong – this is why, and this is where we really are.”

    WHILE THE POLITICIANS ESPOUSE THEIR RHETORIC DESIGNED TO PRESERVE THEIR REPUTATIONS AND THEIR POLITICAL POWER -OUR SOLDIERS DIE!

    Rock on, Sanchez…

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. “Do you want to have a coup d’etat?” « Ned Raggett Ponders It All says:
    October 13, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    […] “Do you want to have a coup d’etat?” October 13th, 2007 — Ned Raggett A lot of talk today about a certain retired general and his comments on Iraq (who knew that there’d be some actual Friday afternoon news?), which is a slight pity as it could obscure a far more interesting story to my mind, namely this report on recent debates within the Army officer corps at Fort Leavenworth regarding the war and many decisions made. A key point comes towards the end: Col. Gregory Fontenot, a Leavenworth instructor, said it was typical of young officers to feel that the senior commanders had not spoken up for their interests, and that he had felt the same way when he was their age. But Colonel Fontenot, who commanded a battalion in the Persian Gulf war and a brigade in Bosnia and has since retired, said he questioned whether Americans really wanted a four-star general to stand up publicly and say no to the president in a nation where civilians control the armed forces. […]

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Kelly on Their Own Private Idaho (Mar 20, 2023 @ 2:56pm)
  • Matt McIrvin on Their Own Private Idaho (Mar 20, 2023 @ 2:56pm)
  • Hoodie on Their Own Private Idaho (Mar 20, 2023 @ 2:55pm)
  • Old School on Their Own Private Idaho (Mar 20, 2023 @ 2:55pm)
  • topclimber on Their Own Private Idaho (Mar 20, 2023 @ 2:54pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!