• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Not loving this new fraud based economy.

“I was told there would be no fact checking.”

Tide comes in. Tide goes out. You can’t explain that.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

75% of people clapping liked the show!

The fundamental promise of conservatism all over the world is a return to an idealized past that never existed.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

The press swings at every pitch, we don’t have to.

People identifying as christian while ignoring christ and his teachings is a strange thing indeed.

They want us to be overwhelmed and exhausted. Focus. Resist. Oppose.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

DeSantis transforming Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

I’m starting to think Jesus may have made a mistake saving people with no questions asked.

Those who are easily outraged are easily manipulated.

President Musk and Trump are both poorly raised, coddled 8 year old boys.

One lie, alone, tears the fabric of reality.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Nothing worth doing is easy.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

Shut up, hissy kitty!

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Paging Gary Farber

Paging Gary Farber

by John Cole|  October 26, 200710:21 am| 40 Comments

This post is in: Politics, Democratic Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

The Democrats need you, according to the Hill:

His memo is sharply critical of Republican policies but also suggests a neurological explanation for Republican message success: By using emotional appeals and warning of dire threats, Republicans can trigger neurons called “amygdalae” in the temporal lobe, which is the seat of the “fight or flight” response in the brain.

Personally, if the Democrats want my support, the part of the body they need to stimulate is their backbone (some pictures here, so the feckless losers might figure out what we are talking about). I didn’t vote for them in 2006 because I liked their policies or suddenly became a convert to liberalism. I voted for them because only a mindless fool could look back at the past two administrations and not realize what a disaster Bush “conservatism” has been.

I voted for the Democrats not to advance their agenda, but because I had hoped they would stand up to Bush. They haven’t.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « One Outcome of High Insurance Rates
Next Post: The Email Smear »

Reader Interactions

40Comments

  1. 1.

    Svensker

    October 26, 2007 at 10:46 am

    That must be Queen Amygdala, the one who said:

    Wake up, Senators… you must wake up! If you offer the separatists violence, they can only show us violence in return! Many will lose their lives. All will lose their freedom. This decision could very well destroy the very foundation of our great Republic. I pray you do not let fear push you into a disastrous decision. Vote down this security measure, which is nothing less than a declaration of war!

    Or was that Queen Schumer, who said:

    Spines? We ain’t got no frigging spines!

    One of those.

  2. 2.

    Dreggas

    October 26, 2007 at 11:00 am

    His memo is sharply critical of Republican policies but also suggests a neurological explanation for Republican message success: By using emotional appeals and warning of dire threats, Republicans can trigger neurons called “amygdalae” in the temporal lobe, which is the seat of the “fight or flight” response in the brain.triggers instant drooling and slobbering in the person shutting down all higher functions making them piss themselves at the word “Terrorist” and otherwise act like a bunch of WATB’s who need a come to jesus meeting.

    Fixed.

  3. 3.

    Jake

    October 26, 2007 at 11:05 am

    Republicans can trigger neurons called “amygdalae” in the temporal lobe, which is the seat of the “fight or flight” response in the brain.

    Well, listening to Republicans often fills me with the urge to punch someone in the face…

    Now, no one tell the Republicans that human beings can’t maintain any emotion for extended amounts of time.

  4. 4.

    Jon H

    October 26, 2007 at 11:20 am

    Careful, the might think you mean the repellent Marty Peretz’s Spine blog.

  5. 5.

    capelza

    October 26, 2007 at 11:20 am

    I keep hoping there is some super secret Democratic plan that Congress is going to unleash when the Republics least expect it.

    A girl has to have her fantasies, you know. :(

  6. 6.

    Billy K

    October 26, 2007 at 11:21 am

    I voted for the Democrats not to advance their agenda,

    Dot hey even HAVE an agenda? I’m (literally) a card-carrying Democrat who visits several lefty sites a day and I’m not aware of any agenda. Hell, even if their agenda sucked, I’d be happy if they HAD one, cause that means they’d at least have something to wake up in the morning for. Does this crop even care about anything? (SCHIP doesn’t count. They stumbled into that more than anything.)

  7. 7.

    Billy K

    October 26, 2007 at 11:22 am

    I keep hoping there is some super secret Democratic plan that Congress is going to unleash when the Republics least expect it.

    I thought that for about 6 months. Then I gave up.

  8. 8.

    gypsy howell

    October 26, 2007 at 11:58 am

    I thought that for about 6 months. Then I gave up.

    Shhhhh…. Don’t wake her up. Capelza is still in Happy Dream Land, where democrats remember why we elected them, and they have courage and stand up to the creeping fascism that is our government. Let her have a few more moments of peace, OK? The truth will rear its ugly head soon enough.

  9. 9.

    Ellison, Ellensburg, Ellers, and Lambchop

    October 26, 2007 at 12:09 pm

    “Our message sounds like an audit report on defense logistics,”

    No, really, it doesn’t. It sounds much more like half-Santa Claus, quarter-Al Jazeera, quarter-Al Gore.

    The Democrats would do well to bury this moron immediately. In a crashing display of utter dimwittedness, for this clown’s sole example of how the Donks’ message sounds like an “audit report on defense logistics,” he chooses an message in which they (wait for it!) sent a 12-year-old kid to give a national address to push a “Bush hates kids” meme.

    Ummmm, suddenly I trust the Democrats’ audit reports on defense logistics even less now.

    Democrats are losing the battle for voters’ hearts because the party’s message lacks emotional appeal,

    So a dim bulb from a party that campaigns on “Bush/Cheney are Evil Incarnate and push seniors in wheelchairs down the stairs” says that the Donks are not “emotional” enough?

    A party that pushes a “warning of dire threats” scenario regarding catastrophic global warming (with pictures of polar bears struggling on melting ice, no doubt whilst writing a Democratic audit report on defense logistics) isn’t trying to frighten voters enough?

    A party that has the Little Ball Of Hate as the DNC Chair, a man who actually said “I hate Republicans and everything they stand for,” is just too darn cerebral?

    A party that has vitriolic supporters shouting down and attacking conservative speakers, students attacking military recruiters and defacing recruitment stations and military gravesites, lunatics attacking their neighbors and murdering citizens of foreign countries who have troops in Iraq — they’re not emotional enough?

    I’d tend to go the other way — the Democrats have so few substantial answers to the problems of the day (besides “more government money for everyone!” — another highly nuanced, intellectual appeal to be sure) that emotional appeal is all they have. Whatever votes they have garnered, it’s not due to any of their technical, emotionless (fictional) policies.

  10. 10.

    capelza

    October 26, 2007 at 12:13 pm

    Oh I am wide awake! And would love to bitch at my reps, though the Dem ones for the most are are on the side of good…but then I live in the “liberal cesspool” of Oregon.

    They still get a regular earful, though…

  11. 11.

    The Other Andrew

    October 26, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    EEEL–are you saying that conservatives have “substantial answers to the problems of the day”? Please do enlighten us.

    Also, I like that bit about Democrats spending a lot. Unfortunately, it isn’t 1999, so it doesn’t really work.

  12. 12.

    Helena Montana

    October 26, 2007 at 12:18 pm

    Republicrats. They’re all cowardly, corrupt, really stupid Republicrats. Talk about fiddling while Rome burns…

  13. 13.

    ThymeZone

    October 26, 2007 at 12:22 pm

    I didn’t vote for them in 2006 because I liked their policies or suddenly became a convert to liberalism.

    I have no particular quibble with your post in general, but John, you’re as much a social liberal as anyone here.

    Just curious, what do you think separates you from “liberalism” nowadays? If it’s fiscal policy, then …. I’m afraid the GOP has pretty much squandered that angle. Three of the five presidents who raised federal spending the most recently are Republicans, not dems.

    Keeping in mind that liberalism is a more of a worldview than a coherent political strategy ….. and that “conservatism” has apparently failed completely to achieve any of its supposed goals, and most miserably failed WRT fiscal restraint, its supposedly most sacrosanct tenet, I am wondering what it is that makes you think that holding onto some charming model of anti-liberalism still works for you?

    I ask only in the most friendly and nurturing way. I swear.

  14. 14.

    gypsy howell

    October 26, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    capelza, I was making a little joke. I hope you knew that. :-)

    I sure wish I could go back to sleep.

  15. 15.

    John Cole

    October 26, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    I am wondering what it is that makes you think that holding onto some charming model of anti-liberalism still works for you?

    When people start shit with me, I throw it back in their god damned faces. That alone separates me from the current crop of liberals.

  16. 16.

    ThymeZone

    October 26, 2007 at 12:32 pm

    When people start shit with me, I throw it back in their god damned faces.

    Well … so do I. But anyway, that’s a comment about people, but not about liberalism.

    Just trying to figure it out. Your famous break over the Schiavo thing was a pretty liberal (liberaltarian, if you like) gesture. Your social views are as liberal as mine, ANAICT.

    What would it take to get you to join up with our team?

  17. 17.

    Snarky Shark

    October 26, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    That alone separates me from the current crop of liberals

    Considering that the term liberal means anybody not goose-stepping to the reich-wing drum-beat, thats a pretty big net you are casting there John.

    Now if you are talking about our so called ‘liberal’ leadership, you are spot the fuck on.

    But I know a bunch of ‘liberals’ that have a full combat load for their assault rifles and are ready to fuck some fascist shit right the fuck up.

    I think you would like them.

    And for all the red-necks who think they will win Civil War v2.3, there is a big difference between sitting your fat ass in a blind and busting a cap in Bambi, and going mono o mono with something that can shoot you back.

    I live in Texas, and I can tell you the red-neck agenda is on the way out. Half the fat asses around here would die from a heart attack just getting trained up. In an ever increasingly complicated world, stupid and proud of it aint gonna ‘git er done’

  18. 18.

    Zifnab

    October 26, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    Also, I like that bit about Democrats spending a lot. Unfortunately, it isn’t 1999 1979, so it doesn’t really work.

    Democrat spending has been hamstrung repeatedly since Carter. Any Republican that tells you differently is trying to sell you something (like a War with Iran).

    Living in 1980 is going to win Republicans elections like its 1960.

    When people start shit with me, I throw it back in their god damned faces. That alone separates me from the current crop of liberals.

    You know, liberals aren’t all pussies, even if all our elected representatives are. That said, I would totally love to string ever “liberal” Senator up by his or her heels and beat’m with a bamboo cane for not filibustering the hell out of every bad bill that’s been passed since ’00.

  19. 19.

    Tsulagi

    October 26, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    What would it take to get you to join up with our team?

    I thought a good part of the answer was in his post: A spine. Rather than the current repeated practice of going turtle retreating into their shell when the other guys get mad at them and call them names.

  20. 20.

    ThymeZone

    October 26, 2007 at 1:19 pm

    I thought a good part of the answer was in his post: A spine.

    Can’t agree. And that’s my point. The spine thing is a complaint about people doing or not doing things.

    Liberalism is a worldview, it either hold together or it doesn’t, whether some particular congress critters nobly represent it or not.

    I can’t find that John is anything but a pretty liberal thinker, trapped in a conservative party. I think he’d be happier in ours. So some Dems are wishy washy. At least they aren’t fucking crazy assed lunatics who read Rapture books and think they’re nonfiction.

  21. 21.

    Ellison, Ellensburg, Ellers, and Lambchop

    October 26, 2007 at 1:23 pm

    Also, I like that bit about Democrats spending a lot. Unfortunately, it isn’t 1999, so it doesn’t really work.

    Really? Just let me know when the Dems plan to cut anything when they take control of Congr… oh, wait, they already have! I guess you weren’t paying attention to the S-CHIP thing — mo’ money, mo’ money, mo’ money! Heck, they won’t even cut the funding to a war you thought they didn’t support!

  22. 22.

    Pug

    October 26, 2007 at 1:25 pm

    …sent a 12-year-old kid to give a national address to push a “Bush hates kids” meme.

    Maybe the meme was really that some 12-year old kids’ families need a little help with medical bills, even if they don’t live in grinding poverty.

    I always wonder why folks like Mr. Lambchop accuse Dems of being obssessed with Bush when it is they who are, in fact, obssessed with Bush.

    They worship him. It is like a cult that 24% of the people in America belong to.

  23. 23.

    jcricket

    October 26, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    I always wonder why folks like Mr. Lambchop accuse Dems of being obssessed with Bush when it is they who are, in fact, obssessed with Bush.

    One word. Say it with me. PROJECTION!

    It is they who are obsessed with sex or digging into people’s private lives. It is they who have a “derangement syndrome”. It is they who are unhinged.

    The list goes on. Pretty much any time they accuse someone else of something untoward, it’s because they’re assuming everyone else is as corrupt, morally bankrupt or paranoid as they are.

  24. 24.

    capelza

    October 26, 2007 at 1:51 pm

    gypsy howell Says:
    capelza, I was making a little joke. I hope you knew that.

    I sure wish I could go back to sleep.

    I figured you were..and I’d love to go to sleep and wake up in a sane country with brave politcians…now that IS fantasy. :(

    Snarky shark…all those brave, brave war porn boys (and girls maybe)…my favourite fantasy is them invading Iran and being confronted with chador clad women armed with AK-47s…trained to kill while wearing a chador.

    The American civil war v2.0..that could be won by the Blue states cutting off their funds. They’s have to pay for their own stuff. Though, as much as I love the South for it’s scenery and many of the people and the graves of my ancestors, I’d just let them leave as lonmg as they took Bush and Bill Kristol with them.

  25. 25.

    Dreggas

    October 26, 2007 at 2:01 pm

    Shit count me in as one of those gun toting liberaltarians that would fuck someone’s shit up if they got in my face. You confuse liberalism with another bad stereotype of the left…pacifism. Not all of us believe in PC turn the other cheek bullshit as we are, after all, the reality based community.

  26. 26.

    Bombadil

    October 26, 2007 at 2:17 pm

    John sez:

    I didn’t vote for them in 2006 because I liked their policies or suddenly became a convert to liberalism. I voted for them because only a mindless fool could look back at the past two administrations and not realize what a disaster Bush “conservatism” has been.

    Looking forward to 2008, Charlie Pierce lays out your Republican choices:

    Romney is deeply, profoundly, relentlessly silly; he appears to be enrolled in a course in Human Being as a Second Language. Rudy Giuliani gets crazier almost by the hour and, at any meeting of his foreign-policy advisory team, he’s the sanest lunatic in the room. Fred Thompson seems to have been unearthed a week ago in the Valley of the Kings. The second tier is populated by people like Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo, neither of whom you would hire to park your car. Ron Paul — an authentic libertarian crackpot — is treated as a serious phenomenon even by people who don’t believe that the U.N. is speaking through the fillings in Katie Couric’s teeth. This past week, we had a general all-hands-on-deck attempt to inflict Huckamania! on the general populace as good ol’ Mike announced his disapproval of Charles Darwin. And then there’s John McCain, who’s spent this entire campaign doing things he’d vowed he’d never do in the last one. I swear to God, they all ought to climb into one little black car and drive into the next debate behind jugglers, high-wire acts, and a parade of circus bears. I cannot remember a presidential field in my lifetime — not even the one that coughed up Mike Dukakis in 1988 — that is as publicly hilarious as this one is. How dare a major political party hand this collection of shills, fakes, loons, and mountebanks on the American people? And one of them is going to win. Jesus wept.

    Doesn’t look any better for you then.

  27. 27.

    Ellison, Ellensburg, Ellers, and Lambchop

    October 26, 2007 at 2:33 pm

    Maybe the meme was really that some 12-year old kids’ families need a little help with medical bills, even if they don’t live in grinding poverty.

    Even granting that (which I don’t really buy, after seeing the two-week kerfuffle)… “Give More People More Money” is not a terribly complex solution to problems, is it? Is it like an audit report on defense logistics? It’s the exact opposite, really.

  28. 28.

    CT Voter

    October 26, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    Democratic leaders were apparently unimpressed with the whole “your message sucks” theme.

    “There is work to be done and that’s why Democrats are working together and mounting an aggressive campaign to discuss the real victories we have won for the American people.”

    Dude. It’s really really working. That’s why approval rates for Congress are so skyhigh these days! These people are clowns.

  29. 29.

    capelza

    October 26, 2007 at 3:40 pm

    I do havepne problem with waving around the Congressinal approval rating. Individually most of the members of Congress have much better approval ratings from their own constituents. It must be everyone else’s congresscritter who is “bad”.

    Comparing the President’s approval (or lack there of) rating with Congress’s overall is rather misleading.

    But the point will sink home..in my fantasy world.

  30. 30.

    Neo

    October 26, 2007 at 3:46 pm

    Is “lost” a “NewD irection” ?

  31. 31.

    CT Voter

    October 26, 2007 at 3:53 pm

    Comparing the President’s approval (or lack there of) rating with Congress’s overall is rather misleading.

    That comparison doesn’t even need to be done. Just compare approval ratings for Congress over time. People think poorly of this Congress. Could be for a variety of reasons, but if that “agressive campaign” of the Democrats were working, wouldn’t people be a little less disapproving?

  32. 32.

    Gary Farber

    October 26, 2007 at 3:55 pm

    Thanks for the shout out, John (gollikins, it’s been ages since I’ve had a link or e-mail response or comment or anything from you), but The Hill should hire more careful writers, since this is sorta not-so-accurate: “Republicans can trigger neurons called ‘amygdalae’ in the temporal lobe….”

    (Your link to me is kinda garbled up with Google HTML, but no matter.)

    The amygdala, of course, is a part of the brain; the brain is made of neurons, but no one says that neurons are “called” such-and-such body part, any more than we say, “let me shake your skin cells and hand bones sheathed in musculature, known as the hand.”

    Sane phrasing would be “Republicans can trigger the amygdala, the part of the brain that….”

    But I fear I’m responsible for so much, if not as much as The Left.

    Thanks again.

  33. 33.

    tBone

    October 26, 2007 at 4:10 pm

    I’d tend to go the other way—the Democrats Republicans have so few substantial answers to the problems of the day (besides “more government money for everyone terrorists are trying to kill us!”—another highly nuanced, intellectual appeal to be sure) that emotional appeal is all they have. Whatever votes they have garnered, it’s not due to any of their technical, emotionless (fictional) policies.

    That was easy.

  34. 34.

    ThymeZone

    October 26, 2007 at 6:21 pm

    Comparing the President’s approval (or lack there of) rating with Congress’s overall is rather misleading.

    Well, actually it’s totally misleading. It means essentially nothing, and it won’t translate into seats for the GOP in 2008. That’s the only thing that counts.

    But hey, it’s always good for a few hours of blogchurn, so that’s why it gets rolled out once a week.

  35. 35.

    blogenfreude

    October 26, 2007 at 6:31 pm

    I emailed the DNC with what I thought was the perfect message: “We’ll undo everything Bush has done.”

  36. 36.

    kritter

    October 27, 2007 at 12:08 am

    Isn’t it a little asinine to keep blaming Democrats for big government programs, when Bush has actually increased the size of government more than they ever could hope to? Massive amounts of tax dollars are being spent on his Medicare prescrition plan, which Congressional Republicans voted in during his first term. The Dept of Homeland Security has become an unwieldy behemoth, and the defense budget is astronomical. When money is spent on our own children’s health, its a waste, but no bid contracts for big defense donors for weapons systems that are often outdated or dont serve a relevant purpose, are seldom mentioned by so-called fiscal conservatives.

    I would like to see bolder action from the Democrats on the FISA bill and war funding, however.

  37. 37.

    Jess

    October 27, 2007 at 12:25 am

    Just let me know when the Dems plan to cut anything when they take control of Congr… oh, wait, they already have! I guess you weren’t paying attention to the S-CHIP thing—mo’ money, mo’ money, mo’ money!

    So far the Iraq war has cost every American man, woman and child $8000, according to the Congressional Budget Office. How much would an increase of S-CHIP cost? I’ve heard it was about what three weeks of the war is costing–have you heard differently, EEEL? Or are you just trying to ignore that bit of inconvenient information?

  38. 38.

    jcricket

    October 27, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    Isn’t it a little asinine to keep blaming Democrats for big government programs, when Bush has actually increased the size of government more than they ever could hope to?

    The only time when big government programs are inherently bad is when they are proposed/implemented/run by Republicans and their incompetent appointees.

    Republicans hate government. It’s “always the problem”. Therefore whatever they implement vis a vis government programs is designed to grab a few votes/support their corporate interests – not to actually help people. Because that would be impossible (a government program that works and helps people).

    One of the best examples of this is the right-wing’s vehement opposition to government-run healthcare. Even when they do implement a piece of healthcare within the government (Medicare Part D) it’s a crony-filled giveaway to big Pharma.

    They know, that any properly funded and run (not stuffed with hacks at the top) government program (of which there have been many in the past) destroys their fundamental “selling point” to Americans. As a Republican strategist argued during the 1993/4 healthcare debates, Republicans must “kill” government run healthcare as an idea, because if the Democrats pass it, they will be seen as the defender of the middle class.

    In other words, Republicans know that there are times when a government run program will be better for most people than what the private sector can provide. But their rigid philosophy can’t abide by that.

    To me this spells the eventual death of the Republican party as we know it. Any political party whose main goal is the destruction of the system it’s in will fracture under the weight of its own idiocy eventually.

  39. 39.

    Billy K

    October 27, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    When people start shit with me, I throw it back in their god damned faces. That alone separates me from the current crop of liberals.

    There are plenty of Dems who do as well – just very few in office (God Bless Jim Webb). For example – most of Daily Kos.

    I think you’re a Kos Kid now.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice says:
    October 26, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    […] Paging Gary Farber […]

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - arrieve - Antarctica Part 2 5
Image by arrieve (6/23/25)

Recent Comments

  • BarcaChicago on The Vibes War (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:45pm)
  • Paul in KY on Odds & Ends (Open Thread) (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:43pm)
  • Barney on Odds & Ends (Open Thread) (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:37pm)
  • Harrison Wesley on Odds & Ends (Open Thread) (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:37pm)
  • Steve LaBonne on Odds & Ends (Open Thread) (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:36pm)

Personality Crisis Podcast (Cole, DougJ, mistermix)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!