• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

T R E 4 5 O N

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

It’s pointless to bring up problems that can only be solved with a time machine.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

Oh FFS you might as well trust a 6-year-old with a flamethrower.

Museums are not America’s attic for its racist shit.

Jack be nimble, jack be quick, hurry up and indict this prick.

They punch you in the face and then start crying because their fist hurts.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

It is not hopeless, and we are not helpless.

This blog will pay for itself.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / Apparently there Is Not Enough Crime in NYC

Apparently there Is Not Enough Crime in NYC

by John Cole|  November 28, 200711:12 am| 70 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

So the cops are trying to gin some up:

Nine months ago, a similar police decoy program called Operation Lucky Bag was effectively shut down by prosecutors and judges who were concerned that it was sweeping up the civic-minded alongside those bent on larceny. Shopping bags, backpacks and purses were left around the subway system, then stealthily watched by undercover officers. They arrested anyone who took the items and walked past a police officer in uniform without reporting the discovery.

Now, a new version of the operation has started to catch people in public places outside the subways, and at much higher stakes, Criminal Court records show.

Unlike the initial program, in which the props were worth at most a few hundred dollars, the bags are now salted with real American Express cards, issued under pseudonyms to the Police Department.

Because the theft of a credit card is grand larceny, a Class E felony, those convicted could face sentences of up to four years. The charges in the first round of Operation Lucky Bag were nearly all petty larceny, a misdemeanor, with a maximum penalty of one year in jail.

Two years ago, I found a wallet on the street in the city I live in. I picked it up, walked past probably several cops and what not, as it never even occurred to me to give it to them. I went through the wallet, found the ID, called the person, met them at Kroger (a grocery store near where we both lived), and gave it to them.

That would make me a potential felon in NYC. As noted in the comments:

It’s a twofer: you discourage good Samaratans (who might actually try to return the purses) while at the same time promoting a view of the police as a sneaky organization out to get you.

Idiots. Maybe if everyone reports them as suspicious packages and it costs them an arm and a leg to scramble the Homeland Security apparatus, it will nip this bullshit in the bud.

*** Update ***

Option #2- If you live in NYC, anything you find unattended should be handed to a policeman. Coke cans, empty McDonald’s bags- it doesn’t matter. It might have an American Express card in it.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Wednesday Morning Open Thread
Next Post: Oral Roberts University: $70 Million Richer »

Reader Interactions

70Comments

  1. 1.

    mitch

    November 28, 2007 at 11:19 am

    Is that not entrapment?

  2. 2.

    Bombadil

    November 28, 2007 at 11:23 am

    Idiots. Maybe if everyone reports them a suspicious packages and it costs them an arm and a leg to scramble the Homeland Security apparatus, it will nip this bullshit in the bud.

    Brilliant.

  3. 3.

    Punchy

    November 28, 2007 at 11:27 am

    Two years ago, I found a wallet on the street in the city I live in. I picked it up, walked past probably several cops and what not, as it never even occurred to me to give it to them.

    Cole nails it. Who thinks to give a random backpack or wallet to Five-O? You find a number, make a call, and deliver it back to the person. Or, in a subway, you’d find a lost’n’found.

    The few cops I know would be all “I don’t want to haul that shit around all day” and have me figure it out for myself. This sounds like entrapment.

  4. 4.

    Billy K

    November 28, 2007 at 11:29 am

    Idiocy. I would never think to return a wallet or purse to a cop. I don’t believe they’d get it back to the owner. No, I’d do what I’ve done before – track down the person and call them myself.

  5. 5.

    Jake

    November 28, 2007 at 11:30 am

    Idiots. Maybe if everyone reports them a suspicious packages and it costs them an arm and a leg to scramble the Homeland Security apparatus, it will nip this bullshit in the bud.

    Careful John. Normally I’d say that’s an excellent idea but since the NYPD seems to be suffering from a massive brain fart they might say that’s calling in a false report.

    And ignoring an unattended bag is aiding and abetting terrists.

    Because the theft of a credit card is grand larceny, a Class E felony, those convicted could face sentences of up to four years.

    WTF? Why not call this Operation Schrodenger’s cat? If I pick up a purse full of credit cards and don’t hand it to the cops does it become a Class E if I don’t open the purse (and therefore never knew there were credit cards)?

    I guess we can add Intent to the list of “quaint” ideas.

  6. 6.

    Dreggas

    November 28, 2007 at 11:31 am

    And to think, the NYPD as it stands is just part of the legacy of Rudy Giuliani…

  7. 7.

    Buck

    November 28, 2007 at 11:39 am

    Be careful calling in suspicious packages.

    If it turns out the package is a bomb they will Richard Jewell your ass.

  8. 8.

    Bill H

    November 28, 2007 at 11:41 am

    Many doctors, including emergency room physicians, will not stop at the scene of a car accident because they are rather ceratin that they will be sued for malpractice and risk losing their medical license if they stop to offer assistance. Not the same thing as this isssue, I know, but…

    No good deed goes unpunished these days.

  9. 9.

    TenguPhule

    November 28, 2007 at 11:41 am

    Welcome to the America that Republicans have made.

    Rejoice, for Big Brother Thought Police DoubleSpeak is Alive and Well.

  10. 10.

    Wilfred

    November 28, 2007 at 11:43 am

    Maybe they could tie a string to the backpacks and pull them along the ground. If someone chases after them, they are assholes as well as potential felons.

    Or how about putting up signs saying that unattended backpacks may contain terrorist bombs? Then if someone tries to pick one up he would be a potential felon terrorist asshole.

  11. 11.

    Nathan

    November 28, 2007 at 11:44 am

    A couple weeks ago, I lost my wallet in a bathroom on a college campus. The guy that found it didn’t return it to the office in the building, instead walking halfway across campus to the financial aid office of all places, figuring they’d have a student directory. It’s definitely not the decision I would have made–I’d have just seen if that building’s office had a lost and found, or failing that tried to look the person up myself. Don’t get me wrong, I’m eternally grateful to the good samaritan that did what he did. My point is, I guess, that there are countless ways to handle the situation, and only one is illegal. The only real way to know if the person intends to break the law is to follow them until they go into a store and use the stolen credit card. Which is absurd.

  12. 12.

    Zifnab

    November 28, 2007 at 11:50 am

    while at the same time promoting a view of the police as a sneaky organization out to get you.

    Promote nothing. They really are, literally, a sneaky organization out to get you, at that point.

    What? Is there seriously so little crime in New York that you need to litter hand bags across subway stations to lure out people who think about committing crimes?

    If anything, this sounds less like a bust on purse snatchers and more a bust on subway bums.

  13. 13.

    Dreggas

    November 28, 2007 at 11:54 am

    Oh and this is the kind of world we get for having shows like “To catch a predator” and other stupid shit. before long they’ll be shooting someone and leaving the gun for you to pickup so you can be hauled in for murder.

  14. 14.

    gypsy howell

    November 28, 2007 at 11:55 am

    They’re training us to be suspicious of each other, and suspicious of seemingly altruistic acts. Just like those repulsive announcements over the PA in the airport instructing us to “Please report all suspicious activity to the Department of Homeland Security.”

    Did you ever think, when you were a kid, that you would hear stuff like this in America in your lifetime?

    I sure didn’t.

    I watched “Lives of Others” recently, and all I could say was “ohhhhhh shit… this is where they’re taking us.”

  15. 15.

    Fwiffo

    November 28, 2007 at 11:58 am

    They’re not trying to catch good Samaritans. They’re trying to catch good Smaritans who don’t trust cops. After all, mistrust of cops is thoughtcrime.

  16. 16.

    wasabi gasp

    November 28, 2007 at 12:02 pm

    They should put guns, cocaine and child porn in the bags too.

  17. 17.

    rawshark

    November 28, 2007 at 12:03 pm

    Why are they using Amex cards? Why drag us into it? Shaft Visa or something.

  18. 18.

    Zifnab

    November 28, 2007 at 12:14 pm

    They’re training us to be suspicious of each other, and suspicious of seemingly altruistic acts. Just like those repulsive announcements over the PA in the airport instructing us to “Please report all suspicious activity to the Department of Homeland Security.”

    Nah, it’s not nearly that devious. This is nice, safe, record-padding police work. When some politico comes by the Department and wants good news, the Chief can crow about how he caught fifty purse snatchers just this month AND how crime is dropping across the board.

    No cop is going to get shot in these stings, so its a popular beat. You get to “fight crime” without any real detective work or risk to life and limb. And it makes for good publicity when you’ve got all these warm, fuzzy numbers to report.

  19. 19.

    Jay C

    November 28, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    And, in addition to being sneaky, underhanded, and borderline-entrapment illegal; “Operation Lucky Bag” is also wildly self-contradictory (and self-defeating as well) – since the NYPD and virtually every other civic agency has spent every day since 9/11/01 haranguing the NYC public to treat ANY unattended bag as “suspicious”: i.e. a possible terrorist hell-bomb loaded with C-4, sarin, anthrax or Polonium (or maybe all four).

    Given the official hysteria in NYC regarding abandoned luggage, it’s amazing anyone would even dare to pick the stuff up anyway: then again, in a city of 8 million folks, the likelihood of finding an idiot is way greater.

    I like John’s solution, though: maybe if DHS, or the FBI, or the Bomb Squad keeps having to be called out to “defuse” the NYPD’s “lucky” bags, someone will get pissed off enough to can this ludicrous operation.

  20. 20.

    Cyrus

    November 28, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    Until someone manages to get elected running on a platform of “Get moderate and realistic on crime,” I blame voters for this. It’s great to know that everyone here agrees this is stupid and totalitarian, but we’re apparently a minority, at least among likely voters in the cities or states where these policies exist.

  21. 21.

    jenniebee

    November 28, 2007 at 12:18 pm

    Well, given the grand success of the sniper program in Iraq where anybody who picked up string off the sidewalk was summarily shot for being a terrist bombmaker, it’s natural that the NYP would want to apply the principles behind that brilliant idea to domestically ferret out those pesky criminals who routinely thwart the police by not being pro-active in the commitment of crime.

  22. 22.

    Face

    November 28, 2007 at 12:19 pm

    If it turns out the package is a bomb they will Richard Jewell your ass.

    Never thought I’d live to see the day “Richard Jewell” was used as a verb. Very well done.

    NYC is about to have a SHITLOAD of random backpacks, briefcases, wallets, and purses left about the city. Either that, or the NYPD had better quadruple the existing size of their Lost and Found, cuz they’re about to get every stray paper bag, half-eaten burrito, and random 16-year-old Strawberry Shortcake faux makeup kit ever kicked up under some random dumpster…

  23. 23.

    Not the Senator

    November 28, 2007 at 12:19 pm

    I would never just hand a wallet over to a beat cop. To a cop on duty at a Precinct who can give me a receipt, yes. To a random first cop that I saw, no. Cops need to provide accountability too.

  24. 24.

    Peter ve

    November 28, 2007 at 12:21 pm

    15 years ago my wife forgot a bag in the NYC subway. She called the subway system, they asked what line she was on, they had the bag, she picked it up at a lost and found. End of story.

    Today, the bag would be taken out and blown up by Reich, er, Homeland Security.

  25. 25.

    Jake

    November 28, 2007 at 12:21 pm

    Just like those repulsive announcements over the PA in the airport instructing us to “Please report all suspicious activity to the Department of Homeland Security.”

    Those used to crack me up when they made them on the Metro. I haven’t heard them in a while, possibly because nervous tourists from Iowa kept hitting the emergency call button to report … everyone.

    I still can’t make heads or tails of the Report Suspicious Activity signs around the Beltway. How does one define supsicious activity on that hot mess? Look! There’s a guy driving AT THE SPEED LIMIT with both hands on the wheel. And he’s checking his blind spot and signalling lane changes! Get him!

    Stupid. Pointless. Doesn’t make you safe.

  26. 26.

    Punchy

    November 28, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    I like Face’s idea more than John’s….

    Just keep handing the poe-leese Random Bags of Anything, claiming in a serious tone, “Somebody may have lost this”. Watch the NYPD become part-time trash collectors. Any random key, calculator, watch, etc…just hand it all over to the nearest cop, and watch how soon they ax this policy.

  27. 27.

    Seanly

    November 28, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    That’s the stupidest anti-crime program I’ve ever heard about. And I agree that the purpose is to make us mistrustful of the police & of doing good deeds. I just hope that was not intended…

    I’d let the nearest cop know about a big untended bag & then get suspicious when he doesn’t do anything about it. Which would result in either finding another cop or dialing 911.

  28. 28.

    Xanthippas

    November 28, 2007 at 12:31 pm

    Maybe if everyone reports them as suspicious packages and it costs them an arm and a leg to scramble the Homeland Security apparatus, it will nip this bullshit in the bud.

    Uh now, now they’ll be coming for you.

  29. 29.

    Xanthippas

    November 28, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    BTW, I’m no specialist on NY criminal law, but it isn’t it a defense to larceny that you didn’t actually intend to, you know, steal anything (as in you were going to return the item to its rightful owner)? I imagine such a defense is becoming pretty popular right now, and I’d be interested in seeing how many people actually get convicted under this ridiculous program at an actual jury trial (as opposed to pleading guilty to avoid jail time or whatnot.)

  30. 30.

    Notorious P.A.T.

    November 28, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    If you live in NYC, anything you find unattended should be handed to a policeman. Coke cans, empty McDonald’s bags- it doesn’t matter. It might have an American Express card in it.

    LOL. “Excuse me, detective, but I found this burning bag of excrement on someone’s porch, and figured I should give it to you since it might contain a credit card.”

    I found this:

    There were 579 murders reported in New York City through December 24 [2006], compared with 527 last year at this time, according to police records. The change represents a 9.8% increase. There were 539 homicides in all of 2005.

    So apparently the NYPD has absolutely nothing better to do than leave random crap around the city and see if someone picks it up.

  31. 31.

    Jake

    November 28, 2007 at 12:56 pm

    There were 579 murders reported in New York City through December 24 [2006], compared with 527 last year at this time, according to police records. The change represents a 9.8% increase. There were 539 homicides in all of 2005.

    The police could start leaving bits of the victims in the bags and pin the crimes on people who pick up the bags. They could zap their open homicide files in a week.

  32. 32.

    jcricket

    November 28, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    It’s obviously because NYC is on pace to have the lowest number of numbers ever (

  33. 33.

    Nylund

    November 28, 2007 at 1:02 pm

    I lived in NYC for 8 years. I found numerous cell phones and wallets, and like John, contacted the person and returned them. Many of my friends, including omce myself, also lost such items and people called us return them directly.

    I guess we were all a bunch of criminals.

    And both times I was mugged, once at gunpoint, and I called the cops, they just rolled their eyes at me like reporting such a crime was an inconvenience. And then, the time my apartment was broken into and I was completely cleaned out, I called the cops and they showed up only to accused ME of robbing my own apartment before promptly leaving and never doing jack shit calling the whole thing an insurance issue.

    Nice to see they still have their priorities straight.

  34. 34.

    jcricket

    November 28, 2007 at 1:03 pm

    Argh (bad HTML in there).I wrote:

    On pace for sub-500 murders total. So the cops need something to do. Someone also mentioned this low number of murders would make NYC-based procedural crime drama shows obsolete.

    Maybe they’ll have Law & Order: HE (handbag edition) or Law & Order: LAFS (lost & found squad).I can hear it now:

    In New York City, lost purses and wallets are considered especially dangerous. The dedicated detectives who investigate these vicious potential credit-card-fraud-crimes are members of an elite squad, known as the Lost & Found Squad. These are there stories.

    boing-boing.

  35. 35.

    LiberalTarian

    November 28, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    Jake says: “Stupid. Pointless. Doesn’t make you safe.”

    Making you safe is not the point. Making you afraid–that is the point. They have been systematically turning us into a country of people afraid of strangers, afraid of our neighbors, afraid of our politicians, afraid of teenagers, afraid of our own damn shadow.

    Citizens who are afraid of terrorists, and afraid of the police, make better sheeple. Sheeple are easy to drive, and eliminate if need be.

    Yeah, I know. I’m pessimistic.

  36. 36.

    Mike

    November 28, 2007 at 1:12 pm

    Why don’t they hide Amex cards in loose sports sections? Then they can arrest anyone who picks one up to check the basketball socres.

  37. 37.

    qwerty42

    November 28, 2007 at 1:20 pm

    hey, let’s be careful out there … remember the “aqua teen hunger force” that terrorized Boston? Fortunately, Boston PD were able to strike back.

  38. 38.

    Dreggas

    November 28, 2007 at 1:27 pm

    jcricket Says:

    Argh (bad HTML in there).I wrote:

    On pace for sub-500 murders total. So the cops need something to do. Someone also mentioned this low number of murders would make NYC-based procedural crime drama shows obsolete.

    Maybe they’ll have Law & Order: HE (handbag edition) or Law & Order: LAFS (lost & found squad).I can hear it now:

    More like Law & Order: Entrapment

    then again they already have “Criminal Intent”

  39. 39.

    Damien

    November 28, 2007 at 1:48 pm

    “I lived in NYC for 8 years. I found numerous cell phones and wallets, and like John, contacted the person and returned them. Many of my friends, including omce myself, also lost such items and people called us return them directly.

    I guess we were all a bunch of criminals.

    And both times I was mugged, once at gunpoint, and I called the cops, they just rolled their eyes at me like reporting such a crime was an inconvenience. And then, the time my apartment was broken into and I was completely cleaned out, I called the cops and they showed up only to accused ME of robbing my own apartment before promptly leaving and never doing jack shit calling the whole thing an insurance issue.

    Nice to see they still have their priorities straight.”

    And that, friends, is why I’ll stick with my little 150k country community or big city bullshit any day. We don’t have quasi-legal entrapment programs like this, and if our cops took NYC’s attitude they’d be out of a job within the month.

  40. 40.

    Jackmormon

    November 28, 2007 at 2:07 pm

    I found a bag on the subway platform a couple of months ago. I didn’t take it becauuse my hands were full and who knows what nastiness could have been in it. So I go to the station agent, thinking I’m all civic-minded, and from within his booth he says with irritation (at me!): “yeah, someone told me about it, I can’t leave my station.”

    If you see something, say…aw fuck it.

  41. 41.

    Garrigus Carraig

    November 28, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    Ha ha. Of course, they’ve been trying to gin up crime for some time. Two words: Patrick Dorismond.

    And this sort of silliness will seem quaint in a few years, when the crime rate returns to normal here in the town so nice they named it twice.

  42. 42.

    r€nato

    November 28, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    Many doctors, including emergency room physicians, will not stop at the scene of a car accident because they are rather ceratin that they will be sued for malpractice and risk losing their medical license if they stop to offer assistance. Not the same thing as this isssue, I know, but…

    actually, many states have ‘Good Samaritan’ laws to prevent this very situation.

  43. 43.

    scarshapedstar

    November 28, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    If you live in NYC, anything you find unattended should be handed to a policeman. Coke cans, empty McDonald’s bags- it doesn’t matter. It might have an American Express card in it.

    Yeah, and if it’s got an ounce of weed and ten thousand dollars in cash, just bring it right to the station, they’ll process it immediately.

  44. 44.

    r€nato

    November 28, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    This is nice, safe, record-padding police work. When some politico comes by the Department and wants good news, the Chief can crow about how he caught fifty purse snatchers just this month AND how crime is dropping across the board.

    exactly. Having to investigate actual crimes takes away from valuable donut-eating time.

  45. 45.

    r€nato

    November 28, 2007 at 3:27 pm

    now, if only the NYPD and Boston PD could put their heads together… they could come up with an entrapment scheme which forces you to pay $375 in court costs in order to challenge your citation, which is non-refundable even if found not guilty.

  46. 46.

    r€nato

    November 28, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    here’s another entrapment idea for the NYPD:

    Have an undercover cop jaywalk or park illegally. Arrest everyone who doesn’t immediately report the jaywalker to the nearest police officer.

  47. 47.

    Dreggas

    November 28, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    r€nato Says:

    now, if only the NYPD and Boston PD could put their heads together… they could come up with an entrapment scheme which forces you to pay $375 in court costs in order to challenge your citation, which is non-refundable even if found not guilty, and allow the police to enter your residence without a warrant, any time they feel like it.

    Fixed. Amazing that this shit is going on, bet it’s all legal under the PATRIOT act though…

  48. 48.

    r€nato

    November 28, 2007 at 3:37 pm

    I think I was confusing the Boston PD with the DC police.

  49. 49.

    ThymeZone

    November 28, 2007 at 3:49 pm

    The most amazing thing to me about this clusterfuck idea is that Rudy Giuliani didn’t put it into operation.

  50. 50.

    The Other Steve

    November 28, 2007 at 3:54 pm

    Wow, this is a stupid waste of police resources.

  51. 51.

    Tax Analyst

    November 28, 2007 at 3:59 pm

    Xanthippas Says:

    BTW, I’m no specialist on NY criminal law, but it isn’t it a defense to larceny that you didn’t actually intend to, you know, steal anything (as in you were going to return the item to its rightful owner)? I imagine such a defense is becoming pretty popular right now, and I’d be interested in seeing how many people actually get convicted under this ridiculous program at an actual jury trial (as opposed to pleading guilty to avoid jail time or whatnot.)

    Well, you see, that’s the beauty of a program like this. Police & District Attorneys know that Poor People are often unaware of their actual rights and also do not possess enough cash or material collateral for bail or to hire an adequate attorney. So often they will accept “deals” and plead guilty to “lesser charges” (a fine distinction when you have done nothing wrong in the first place, eh?). Up goes the DA’s conviction rate…promotion and perhaps, dare I say, IMPORTANT POLITICAL OFFICE may suddenly appear a feasible possibility in their future.

    You can understand how any amoral weasel could easily be swayed by the possibilities.

  52. 52.

    RSA

    November 28, 2007 at 4:16 pm

    Have an undercover cop jaywalk or park illegally. Arrest everyone who doesn’t immediately report the jaywalker to the nearest police officer.

    I guess staging reenactments of Kitty Genovese would be in poor taste?

  53. 53.

    HyperIon

    November 28, 2007 at 4:20 pm

    I watched “Lives of Others” recently, and all I could say was “ohhhhhh shit… this is where they’re taking us.”

    very good film. but i dispute your language.
    this is where we are taking ourselves.

  54. 54.

    Out There

    November 28, 2007 at 5:28 pm

    A few years ago I found an envelope with money in it. I turned it in to the local police. I was told that if no one claimed it in 30 days it was mine. When I checked back 30 days later they said it had been claimed. When I asked who it had belonged to, their answer was “It was none of my business”. I am willing to bet that they kept it and spent it themself.

  55. 55.

    RSA

    November 28, 2007 at 5:28 pm

    Kinda off-topic, but I’m happy to read that there are lots of good Samaritans among BJ commenters. Once my wife lost her purse, which was returned to her by mail a couple of weeks later. No return address. I wondered, “Why would someone not want to be thanked for having done a good thing?” Then I realized that although the credit cards, driver’s license, and so forth were still in the purse, the money (a small amount, probably) was gone. And I thought that if I were returning a purse that I’d found, with or without money in it, I wouldn’t want to be the owner to think that I’d taken anything out of it, whether I had or hadn’t. Hmm.

  56. 56.

    demimondian

    November 28, 2007 at 5:34 pm

    good Samaritans among BJ commenters

    Discussions of Christianity were scheduled yesterday. Today, we are back to our usual non-theistic blasphemy. Didn’t you get the memo?

  57. 57.

    Punchy

    November 28, 2007 at 5:53 pm

    but I’m happy to read that there are lots of good Samaritans among BJ commenters

    Did you just put “good” and “BJ commenters” in the same sentence? Steely McBeam is surely rolling in his grave…

  58. 58.

    Jake

    November 28, 2007 at 5:57 pm

    So I go to the station agent, thinking I’m all civic-minded, and from within his booth he says with irritation (at me!): “yeah, someone told me about it, I can’t leave my station.”

    If you see something, say…aw fuck it.

    Yep. I once reported a huge greasy box that had fucking metal and wires sticking out of it and for once did not to laugh at the warnings. Decided not to get on that train, went to the station manager and got the “Why the fuck are you telling me this?” look.

    Whatevs. If a container is ticking, beeping or smoking I’ll say something. But it just makes the “Don’t be complacent, Say something about that bag,” signs that much funnier.

  59. 59.

    jcricket

    November 28, 2007 at 6:45 pm

    The most amazing thing to me about this clusterfuck idea is that Rudy Giuliani didn’t put it into operation.

    Too busy himself increasing the white collar crime so the cops would have something to do.

    Any Democrat caught illegally billing his “mistress-related expenses” to various city agencies would be immediately dead as a candidate. Will be interesting to see what this does to Rudy.

    Considering he’s hung on this long (with the taint of Bernie Kerik, and multiple affairs already known issues).

  60. 60.

    SGEW

    November 28, 2007 at 7:04 pm

    Option #2- If you live in NYC, anything you find unattended should be handed to a policeman. Coke cans, empty McDonald’s bags- it doesn’t matter. It might have an American Express card in it.

    As a lifelong New Yorker, who has had more than my fair share of interaction with the NYPD over the years, I heartily recommend that nobody actually does this. Seriously. They’ll shoot you.

  61. 61.

    SGEW

    November 28, 2007 at 7:06 pm

    Oh, to qualify my statement above: Don’t attempt this if you’re not white. Sorry, made some assumptions there.

  62. 62.

    Jack Roy

    November 28, 2007 at 7:58 pm

    This is beyond stupid, as noted at length by John and many other commenters above. I will note that the definition of larceny in NY is:

    A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property from an owner thereof.

    How on earth the state could actually show the requisite “intent to deprive” beyond a reasonable doubt is really beyond me. Seems like everyone who got in trouble either confessed their larcenous intent to the police or pled guilty; if a suspect refused to say anything to the police, lawyered up, and contested the charges on the grounds that he intended to try to locate the owner, I can’t imagine how a prosecutor could make it stick (assuming the jury did their job).

  63. 63.

    whoozit

    November 28, 2007 at 8:21 pm

    “How on earth the state could actually show the requisite “intent to deprive” beyond a reasonable doubt is really beyond me. Seems like everyone who got in trouble either confessed their larcenous intent to the police or pled guilty; if a suspect refused to say anything to the police, lawyered up, and contested the charges on the grounds that he intended to try to locate the owner, I can’t imagine how a prosecutor could make it stick (assuming the jury did their job).”

    From the very article you are presumably commenting on –

    “So far, lawyers at the Legal Aid Society have identified four pending felony cases arising from the decoys. The police complaints describe suspicious behavior. For instance, after a 50-year-old man picked up the purse left in the Macy’s shoe department, he put it in a shoe box and carried it to the other side of the store, a complaint said. Then he took the wallet out of the purse, put it in his pocket, and left the shoe box and purse behind, according to the police. That case is pending.”

  64. 64.

    r€nato

    November 28, 2007 at 8:41 pm

    I’d really rather not hear about Kerik’s taint.

  65. 65.

    r€nato

    November 28, 2007 at 8:45 pm

    A few years ago I found an envelope with money in it. I turned it in to the local police. I was told that if no one claimed it in 30 days it was mine. When I checked back 30 days later they said it had been claimed. When I asked who it had belonged to, their answer was “It was none of my business”. I am willing to bet that they kept it and spent it themself.

    Perhaps, perhaps not. They probably aren’t permitted to reveal such information.

    That being said, I think all of us who partake or have partaken in herbal supplements, know what happens on those occasions when the cops find a joint or baggy of weed on you, take it and tell you to get on your way…

  66. 66.

    jake

    November 28, 2007 at 9:43 pm

    Seems like everyone who got in trouble either confessed their larcenous intent to the police or pled guilty;

    Yep. This is the state sanctioned equivalent of rolling bums. And since I’m feeling tin foil hattish, it’s also a really easy way to hand out criminal records to a large number of people with minimal effort.

    All shit like this does is make people adopt a fuck it attitude towards breaking the law because it makes the law meaningless. It also dilutes the deterrent effect of punishment. If you’re going to get in trouble anyway no matter what you do, why bother following any of the rules?

  67. 67.

    Jon H

    November 28, 2007 at 10:46 pm

    Also, New Yorkers could start referring to the police as ‘lost and found’.

  68. 68.

    slippytoad

    November 29, 2007 at 7:25 am

    I’ve thought of several dozen pranks one could pull once the word gets around that you have to run found handbags to the nearest policeman. This may be a job for Joey Skaggs.

    My first thought was make up several bags with those dye things that banks put in money bags, and leave them near patrolling policement. They’d get real sick of that pretty quick.

  69. 69.

    grumpy realist

    November 29, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    This makes no sense. Because a) given all the warnings out there, I really doubt that people are going to pick up and carry around a backpack/whatever. Which means the best the police are going to do is get reports: “hey, there’s what looks to be like a lost backpack down the street over there.” Now, if the policeman standing there doesn’t do anything about this, like make an attempt to deal with it, a series of “yeah, we know about it” is going to simply be training NYCers to not report anything at all because they will assume that all backpacks out there have already been reported and the NYC police are fat lazy asses who simply haven’t gotten around to doing anything about any of it.

    I also remark that how will the police know that all of these reported backpacks are really decoys at any one time?

    Whoever thought this up has no knowledge of human behavior and no understanding of risk.

  70. 70.

    golfer

    December 6, 2007 at 3:03 pm

    Pretty soon the cops will do this in areas with alot of minorities but instead of phone credit cards or x-box they’ll plant drugs, and some poor shmuck may get framed and sent to prison for a long time. Good idea huh? NYPD! We should lay off a bunch of police officers if this is what they have to do to keep working. For all those arrest that they made these police officers should go to hell. Its not right to waste someones time like this.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/10.25)

Recent Comments

  • Baud on On The Road – 🐾BillinGlendaleCA – Dark Places (May 13, 2025 @ 5:24am)
  • bjacques on The Odd Couple (May 13, 2025 @ 5:14am)
  • eclare on Overnight Open Thread: This and That Plus Some Music (May 13, 2025 @ 4:42am)
  • Doug on Monday Night Open Thread (May 13, 2025 @ 4:33am)
  • Doug on War for Ukraine Day 1,173: Well that Didn’t Take Long (May 13, 2025 @ 4:32am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!