• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

This fight is for everything.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Shut up, hissy kitty!

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

There’s always a light at the end of the frog.

…and a burning sense of injustice to juice the soul.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

It’s a doggy dog world.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

Nikki Haley, who can’t acknowledge ‘slavery’, is a pathetic shill.

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

When the time comes to make an endorsement, the pain of NYT editors will be palpable as they reluctantly whisper “Biden.”

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Presidential Match-o-Matic

Presidential Match-o-Matic

by Michael D.|  December 4, 20072:55 pm| 69 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Just for fun, I tried this quiz from ABC News. Pretty accurate – for me at least. What presidential candidate do you most closely match up with. My top three:

#3. Hillary Clinton
#2. Mike Gravel

#1. Bill Richardson

That doesn’t surprise me at all.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The Cheney Administration
Next Post: One More Thing About the NIE »

Reader Interactions

69Comments

  1. 1.

    Jen

    December 4, 2007 at 3:00 pm

    But what are you supposed to do if you get Biden? I already knew that. He’s experienced, he’s witty and sensible, he sticks his foot in his mouth like I do, and he’s clean!

  2. 2.

    Zifnab

    December 4, 2007 at 3:10 pm

    3) Edwards
    2) Kucinich
    1) Gravel

    Some of those questions were horribly worded, and the quote extrapolation was just as bad. Bleh. I’m learning to like ABC less and less.

  3. 3.

    ThymeZone

    December 4, 2007 at 3:10 pm

    My perfect candidate was Pat Paulsen.

    Since then, nobody has really inspired me.

  4. 4.

    mrmobi

    December 4, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    3) Biden
    2) Gravel
    1) Kucinich

    Yikes, says the Obama-supporter.

  5. 5.

    Buck

    December 4, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    #1) Ron Paul

    #2) Mike Gravel

    #3) Dennis Kucinich

    I guess this is what happens to a person who spends too much time reading Lew Rockwell and Justin Raimondo.

  6. 6.

    Ninerdave

    December 4, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    I wouldn’t say accurate, I scored:

    1) Mike Gravel
    2) Dennis Kucinich
    3) Barack Obama

    I think the first two are nuts, even though I mar agree with their Iraq war positions.

  7. 7.

    jcricket

    December 4, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    Since this is open-threadish, here’s a great post about how the “glory days” of righteous perfection, moral claritude and universal politeness the right pines for (and tells us we have fallen away from) never existed. Bonus points if you can guess who said these things and when without reading the post first:

    That such brutal language as “You cock-sucking son of a bitch!” “You prick-eating bastard!” “You cunt-lapping dog!” “Kiss my ass you son of a bitch!” “A dog must have fucked your mother when she made you!” “I fucked your mother, your sister, your wife!” “I’ll make you suck my ass!” “You cock-sucker!” and many other revolting terms are used by a limited number of […] to […] is vouched for by the almost unanimous assertion of those invited to speak and who are competent to speak from personal knowledge.

    The from whom/to whom are blanked out just for fun.

  8. 8.

    Z

    December 4, 2007 at 3:20 pm

    I had 1) Dodd 2) Biden 3) Clinton.

    Huh.

  9. 9.

    4tehlulz

    December 4, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    I had:

    1. Kucinich
    2. Gravel
    3. Obama

    That last question about experience hoses the data, I suspect.

  10. 10.

    guyermo

    December 4, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    ugh. The three in the democratic field that i would never vote for.

    1, kucinich
    2. gravel
    3. Biden

  11. 11.

    jcricket

    December 4, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    Geez

    #3) Bill Richardson

    #2) Mike Gravel

    #1) Dennis Kucinich

    And I’m not particularly left-wing. Shows just how far the right has moved the center when Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel are the best candidates for moderates.

    For me it was probably because of my support for gay marriage, single-payer, get out of Iraq, repeal the bush tax cuts. If that makes me a nutball moonbat leftard, so be it.

  12. 12.

    Mark S.

    December 4, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    1. Biden

    2. Clinton
    3. Dodd

    I only agreed with Biden on six of the questions, and one of those was the stupid question about what the candidate’s previous job was. And I only agreed with Dodd on three, including the Senator one. I must be out of the mainstream.

  13. 13.

    DragonScholar

    December 4, 2007 at 3:26 pm

    1) Kucinich
    2) Gravel
    3) Richardson

    . . . eh. Well three unelectables, but still, I answered honestly.

    This is why we need multiple political parties. To make the system more stirred up, have more shots and new ideas, and confuse the heck out of the lobbyists who will be less sure who to bribe.

  14. 14.

    cleek

    December 4, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    1. Kucinich
    2. Gravel
    3. Obama

    this one says i’m 88% Gravel.

    it’s all BS. i’m 100% Rudy, because i have this closet full of brown shirts and combat boots, and no reason to wear them!

  15. 15.

    Bombadil

    December 4, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    Mine were the same as Zifnab — 3) Edwards, 2)Kucinich and 1) Gravel.

    Bizarre. And a pretty crappy picture of Gravel, too.

  16. 16.

    Dreggas

    December 4, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    #3. Hillary Clinton

    #2. Mike Gravel

    #1. Bill Richardson

    That doesn’t surprise me at all

    Tell me again why you’re a republican? Sorry but had to get that one in there Michael. Then again 2 of the 3 for you are “centrists”.

  17. 17.

    Jen

    December 4, 2007 at 3:34 pm

    An email exchange with my dad, who loves me even tho I turned out all pinko, uncorrected for Republican punctuation:

    Does this just do Republican’s or are the Democrat’s in here?

    I came out Mitt Romney, Rudy G and then Mike H. Thought sure I would come out Hilary.

    — Dad

    It does the Democrats too. You just have to put in the sensible answers to see them.

    — Jen

  18. 18.

    jenniebee

    December 4, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    I got Gravel, Kucinich, Biden. The questions were bizarre – three or four reactionary (ergo, sensible) options, and then one wacktastic lefty option. For instance, several of the Democratic front-runners are suggesting public-private competition for health care plans, but that didn’t show up on the list; the closest to it was an outright single-payer system. But there was room in the options for “scrap the current system and let the free market solve it.” Hello? the current “system” that nobody thinks is working particularly well is the free market solution.

    Liberal media, my Aunt Fanny.

  19. 19.

    Seanly

    December 4, 2007 at 3:40 pm

    3. Biden
    2. Kucinich
    1. Gravel

    Ummmmm I don’t think so. Maybe Biden if he apologized for being a shill for credit card companies. Gravel is crazy.

    I’m sad that nobody has talked about a subject dear to my heart: infrastructure. I design bridges and would love if we had enough money to do all the work that needs to be done.

    The link from Cleek above was interested. Weight the issues & then answer just a few questions. That came up with 90% for Kucinich & Gravel for me. Edwards & Clinton were 84%, Obama 82% for me. Ron Paul is in the 50’s (probably due to Iraq) while the rest of the Repubs are around 40%.

  20. 20.

    Billy K

    December 4, 2007 at 3:42 pm

    Richardson, Gravel & clinton? But wait – you’re a Republican. I’m a Democrat and somehow I think I match up with Paul best.

    WTF is going on?

  21. 21.

    The Other Steve

    December 4, 2007 at 3:42 pm

    I answered the questions the exact oposite of how I would really respond.

    I got Mitt Romney, John McCain, and some other guy I don’t remember.

  22. 22.

    John Cole

    December 4, 2007 at 3:44 pm

    Guess I am the real pinko commie:

    1.) Kucinich
    2.) Gravel
    2.) Dodd

    I didn’t like the choices on many of the questions, though, as for most of them there should have been combinations of answers. Like the Iraq question- we should stop funding the war in Iraq, but we should still fund operations of the troops, but we should GTFO because we are accomplishing nothing. Having to choose one of the answers is BS.

    Also, the health care questions were framed weirdly. From a utilitarian and savings standpoint, the best way to get more people covered is nationalized single-payer. Is that what is best or what I want to happen? Not sure. is that the only thing that can be done. No. but if your goal is simply blanket insurance, it is the best way to go. It tells us nothing about what my preferences are, though, and it is misleading to determine my candidate through that question.

  23. 23.

    Billy K

    December 4, 2007 at 3:47 pm

    #1 Kucinich
    #2 Paul
    #3 Gravel

    I guess I really am a Liberaltarian*. I always cringe at that word.

    (*Not that ABC and their toy political site knows shit)

  24. 24.

    PK

    December 4, 2007 at 3:54 pm

    #1 Kucinich
    #2 Gravel
    #3 Ron Paul
    I had no idea I was a libetarian. I had no idea what Gravel looked like!

  25. 25.

    bernarda

    December 4, 2007 at 3:55 pm

    1 – Kucinich

    2 – Gravel

    3 – Paul

    But I only differed on one thing with Kucinich. The other two were far behind. It was 7 out of 10 disagreements with Paul.

    The last question was stupid and irrelevant.

  26. 26.

    Jen

    December 4, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    There’s a decided tilt to Kucinich here. I think that means he’s going to win.

  27. 27.

    Grumpy Code Monkey

    December 4, 2007 at 3:57 pm

    #3 — Chris Dodd
    #2 — Hitlery
    #1 — Kucinich?!

    I call shenanigans. It’s a dead heat — 4/10 for all of them.

    War — 3/3 Dodd, 2/3 Hitlery, 0/3 Kucinich
    Immigration — 0/2 for all
    Health Care — 0/2 for Dodd and Clinton, 2/2 for Kucinich
    Hot Topics — 1/4 for Dodd, 2/4 for Clinton and Kucinich

    Yeah, I’d say that poll sucks just a tiny bit.

  28. 28.

    Bubblegum Tate

    December 4, 2007 at 3:58 pm

    I think this thing is busted…it says my ideal candidate is Tina Fey. (Because if the president is going to be funny, don’t you think it should be on purpose?)

  29. 29.

    Flappy McScrotum

    December 4, 2007 at 3:58 pm

    Kucinich
    Gravel
    Dodd

    But I didn’t like some of the answers and thought there should of been more options. All well.

  30. 30.

    Flappy McScrotum

    December 4, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    Oh yea, I hated that question at the about the level of experience. It was too simplistic.

  31. 31.

    mitch

    December 4, 2007 at 4:04 pm

    #1 Joe Biden
    #2 Bill Richardson
    #3 Chris Dodd

    Hmm, that seems somewhat reasonable. I’ve always liked Joe Biden, too bad he keeps putting his foot in his mouth. Bill Richardson seems like a smart guy with a shitload of experience, too bad he can’t campaign very well. I don’t know much about Chris Dodd, although I hear the odd good proposal coming from him.

    I didn’t like the way some of the questions were worded. In terms of experience, the option I chose was “Governor or Mayor”. But why the hell is mayor included with governor? I cringed at picking that, knowing that would bump up my match to Giuliani. I would have chosen “most of the above” if possible, but since I had to choose one, i figure governor. Too bad there wasn’t an “anything but mayor” option.

  32. 32.

    cleek

    December 4, 2007 at 4:06 pm

    who’s the “run a business” candidate ?

  33. 33.

    Jake

    December 4, 2007 at 4:08 pm

    1. Kucinich, 2. Dodd, 3. Gravel.

    Now I wonder how some of the fRighties would match up.

  34. 34.

    Nick

    December 4, 2007 at 4:15 pm

    Yikes, I basically mirrored John’s choices:

    3.) Kucinich
    2.) Gravel
    1.) Dodd

  35. 35.

    Cain

    December 4, 2007 at 4:26 pm

    1. Kucinich 2. Gravel 3. Dodd

    I actually like Kucinich so I’m okay with my results. I’m moderate with some conservative tendencies but apparently I’m really a dyed in the wool liberal like John!

    cain

  36. 36.

    J. Lynne

    December 4, 2007 at 4:28 pm

    I’m very disturbed that Ron Paul came up as my #3. Sometimes I think he makes sense and then I think he’s really scary.

    2.) Gravel (Never even heard of him.)
    1.) Kucinich (Not surprised.)

  37. 37.

    Shinobi

    December 4, 2007 at 4:29 pm

    i got all republicans..how odd… Romney Huckabee and someone else I don’t remember. WTF? The thing is I know I disagree with all of them on OTHER issues that actually matter to me more than immigration in particular.

    In other words, this quiz sucks.

  38. 38.

    Dennis - SGMM

    December 4, 2007 at 4:29 pm

    3.)Clinton
    2.)Obama
    1.)Kucinich

    I could vote for Kucinich (Fat chance!) or Obama, but not for Clinton, never for Clinton.

  39. 39.

    KCinDC

    December 4, 2007 at 4:29 pm

    I got Kucinich, Obama, Gravel. The questions and answers were horrible. Are we sure they weren’t designed by a Kucinich supporter (or a Republican who wanted most Democrats to come out as Kucinich supporters)?

    Cleek, I think Romney would be the “run a business” candidate, since Bush won’t be running again to supply a “run a business into the ground” option.

  40. 40.

    smiley

    December 4, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    1) Obama 2) Clinton 3) Richardson. I didn’t even know that I am a MSM journalist.

  41. 41.

    demkat620

    December 4, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    3) Edwards, 2)Kucinich and 1) Gravel

    I got the trifecta as well. My first thought was I have really moved to the left.

  42. 42.

    Tzal

    December 4, 2007 at 4:34 pm

    1. Mike Huckabee

    2. Dennis Kucinich
    3. Brownback

    What the?

  43. 43.

    croatoan

    December 4, 2007 at 4:38 pm

    I would have liked the gay marriage question to start off with “The Fourteenth Amendment says, ‘no state shall…deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.'”

  44. 44.

    curtadams

    December 4, 2007 at 5:02 pm

    1 Kucinich
    2 Gravel
    3 Dodd

    Which does match my stand on the issues, although not my voting preference. The ranking would be much more accurate if there were questions about candidate kookiness.

    There’s a better version at

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/candidate-match-game.htm?loc=interstitialskip
    which shows which questions contribute to the ranking. Although my #3 was different there (Richardson rather than Dodd). I might have answered some of the questions differently (some decisions were very close) or just hit a wrong button.

  45. 45.

    Grumpy Code Monkey

    December 4, 2007 at 5:07 pm

    So for giggles, I ran it several more times, this time picking positions I disagreed with the most. 2 out of 3 times I get the Mittster. The other time I get Fred Thompson.

    Disappointing. I got Rudy as a #3 once, but that’s all. Further proof that this poll sucks.

  46. 46.

    D-Chance.

    December 4, 2007 at 5:09 pm

    cleek Says:

    who’s the “run a business” candidate ?

    Giuliani.

    Stupid quiz:
    1) The misshapen elf (Kucinich)
    2) The nut (Gravel)
    3) The Hitler-wannabe (Giuliani).

    —–

    BTW, anyone here listen to the Dem debate on NPR? By far, the best debate so far. No TV cameras, no studio audience. Three moderators, three subjects: Iran/China/immigration. Open, coversational discussion without the theatrics. Wish ALL the debates would use this format.

    Replay tonight (9-11 pm Pacific, figure your own damn time zones).

    Obama, Dodd, Biden all came out well, I thought.
    Clinton seemed a bit too wonkish, and shut out for long stretches.
    Edwards hit the populist theme hard. Eeeevil corporations. Bleh.
    Kucinich, eh.
    Gravel is a moron. Period.
    Richardson a no-show.

  47. 47.

    Michael D.

    December 4, 2007 at 5:10 pm

    Tell me again why you’re a republican?

    LOL! I should never have mentioned to anyone here that I was a republican. It has totally skewed the comments, and no doubt caused more than a few of you to have connipions. :-)

  48. 48.

    Pb

    December 4, 2007 at 5:12 pm

    Grumpy Code Monkey,

    Yeah, I tried it backwards too, and got Romney, Thompson, and Giuliani; otherwise, my top two always seem to be Kucinich and Gravel, go figure.

  49. 49.

    ChristieS

    December 4, 2007 at 5:12 pm

    Hmmm…

    Kucinich
    Richardson
    Gravel

    I agree with the preponderance of opinion: These questions stunk.

  50. 50.

    jon

    December 4, 2007 at 5:18 pm

    Kucinich, Gravel, Dodd.

    I don’t get it, but I see I’m not alone in that. (For both results and reaction.)

  51. 51.

    jcricket

    December 4, 2007 at 5:32 pm

    It has totally skewed the comments, and no doubt caused more than a few of you to have connipions.

    connipions? Are those some sort of genetically modified onions?

    Oh, conniptions, got it.

    Well, what’s your spirited defense of being a Republican, in this day and age? It’s not like they haven’t given you a long time to think over who you’re associating yourself with.

  52. 52.

    Rusty Shackleford

    December 4, 2007 at 6:19 pm

    John Cole Says:

    Guess I am the real pinko commie:

    1.) Kucinich
    2.) Gravel
    2.) Dodd

    December 4th, 2007 at 3:44 pm

    I had the same results in the same order. But I support Obama, along with Biden and Dodd.

  53. 53.

    John S.

    December 4, 2007 at 6:32 pm

    Blimey! I came up with:

    1. Kucinich
    2. Richardson
    3. Obama

    I guess that is almost right, except I would substitute Dodd for Richardson. Then in terms of pragmatism and electibility I would flip it.

    Ultimately, I like Dodd the best, but I don’t think he’s going anywhere. So I guess I have to bank on Obama.

  54. 54.

    PaulW

    December 4, 2007 at 6:34 pm

    I ended up with Dodd.

    My problem with that survey was that I was stuck with just one choice per question. The problem was that on some of the questions I wanted to pursue a multitude of options rather than just one, so it limited me in ways I didn’t like (for example I believe in the carbon tax as well as investing in alternative renewable energy sources, but I could only choose one. Phooey).

  55. 55.

    Badtux

    December 4, 2007 at 6:46 pm

    3. Ron Paul. Hmm, that’s surprising — but I only agreed with him on one thing other than the Iraq war and what we should do there.

    2. Dennis Kucinich. Given that I just sent him a big campaign contribution, that’s not surprising either. The Iraq War and Health Care were the two big issues I agreed with him on, although undoubtedly for different reasons than Dennis would like (in my case, not because of any misguided idealism but, rather, due to practical considerations of national security and economics).

    1. Mike Gravel. WTF?! The cranky ole’ grandpa from Alaska? Difference between him and Kucinich was one question, Gravel’s support for the “carbon tax”, which I also support. Hmm. If he wasn’t so dad-gummed old…

  56. 56.

    maxbaer (not the original)

    December 4, 2007 at 6:48 pm

    Kucinich,Gravel and Biden

    There’s more support for Gravel here than he’ll ever see anywhere else. Let’s elect him honorary president of Balloon Juice.

  57. 57.

    Conservatively Liberal

    December 4, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    1: Kucinich
    2: Gravel
    3: Paul

    I guess this certifies that I am a nutjob. I like Dodd and Biden, Paul is a bit too extreme for me, and out of the eleven matching categories, Paul and I agree on only four of them. In otherwords, there is no candidate that I can support that I can begin to see eye to eye with (that stands a chance of winning). I give up, call me after the election. ;)

  58. 58.

    Shade Tail

    December 4, 2007 at 6:55 pm

    #1: Dennis Kucinich

    Good, as he’s the one I support.

    #2: Mike Gravel

    He’s a loon and I don’t want him in office, but he says some good things.

    #3: Ron Paul

    Probably because of the war questions. I disagree with him on everything else.

    Miscelanea: That last question was rediculous. “Which kind of experience do you think matters most for presidential candidates?” None of them were the least bit important to me, but there was no “none of the above” option, of course. After about 30 seconds of vexxed consideration, I selected “House of Representatives” simply because I knew it would be a point for Kucinich. It was also a point for Paul, of course.

  59. 59.

    Cindrella Ferret

    December 4, 2007 at 7:00 pm

    More proof that I am a fringe lunatic (and proud of it):

    #1 Gravel

    #2 Kucinich

    #3 Paul

    Time from some brown acid and tequila. Right after I kill dinner with me 2nd Amendment approved firearm. But I promise to eat it with organic, locally grown produce.

    Damn! Where are the keys to my fully electric Hummer?

  60. 60.

    IanY77

    December 4, 2007 at 7:42 pm

    Kucinich, Huckabee, Dodd.

    Wow. Just….wow

    /most liberal with the most socially conservative.
    //I really am schizoid

  61. 61.

    jcricket

    December 4, 2007 at 7:44 pm

    What’s funny is that I think of Edwards as the person closest to me policy-wise (income inequality is a big issue for me). Maybe Dodd as a second.

  62. 62.

    bryanD

    December 4, 2007 at 9:58 pm

    My results:

    1)Paul
    2)Gravel
    3)Romney

    I’m 100% for Paul, BUT:

    Is Romney slick and sticky or what? I pressed the anti-war button and the “military experience” button, yet…THERE HE IS!!!

  63. 63.

    borehole

    December 4, 2007 at 10:14 pm

    Like 4tehlulz said, that last question about experience throws the whole thing off. If there was a box for “I don’t give a shit,” no way I’d end up with Kucinich as #1 and Dodd in friggin’ third.

    Felt good to publically admit I’m for the flat tax, though. That’s been eating at me like a cancer.

  64. 64.

    craigie

    December 4, 2007 at 11:52 pm

    3) Paul
    2) Gravel
    1) Kucinich

    WTF? Maybe a Kucinich/Paul ticket really is a uniting ticket!

  65. 65.

    Bruce Moomaw

    December 5, 2007 at 1:20 am

    Cripes. With me it was Edwards, Kucinich and Gravel, despite the fact that I personally regard the latter two as first-class nut cases. Either ABC’s poll is screwy or I am.

  66. 66.

    Win Harrison

    December 5, 2007 at 1:39 am

    3) Obama – nope forget it.
    2) Richardson – forget it, he’s a ringer for Hillary. Just listen to him in debates.
    1) Kucinich – fair enough.

    But the only reason I got him instead of Edwards was that the last stupid question asked whether I want a Senator, congressman, governor or eh Mayor. That last question spoils the broth me thinks.

  67. 67.

    Lupin

    December 5, 2007 at 8:40 am

    1. Kucinich
    2. Gravel
    3. Paul

    And I used to subscribe to THE ECONOMIST.

    We’re so fucked.

  68. 68.

    b-psycho

    December 5, 2007 at 11:09 am

    I took that votematch thing out of sheer boredom a lil while ago, even though I know I’m not voting. At least I got an amusing picture out of it.

  69. 69.

    DeepKarma

    December 6, 2007 at 2:50 pm

    3. Dodd
    2. Gravel
    1. Kucinich

    OMG…I think I need to try this again. I don’t remember any questions about being pro-long legged redheads with tongue piercings.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Baud on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 5:25pm)
  • Harrison Wesley on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 5:24pm)
  • Mike in NC on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 5:22pm)
  • Steeplejack on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 5:21pm)
  • Jackie on I Am All For This! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 5:20pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!