Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

Let’s show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

The lights are all blinking red.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

“Until such time as the world ends, we will act as though it intends to spin on.”

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

We’ll be taking my thoughts and prayers to the ballot box.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Shut up, hissy kitty!

So many bastards, so little time.

Ron DeSantis, the grand wizard, oops, governor of FL.

Republicans don’t trust women.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Elections aren’t won by handwringing, cowering, and/or bashing your own candidates.

Everything is totally normal and fine!!!

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

If ‘weird’ was the finish line, they ran through the tape and kept running.

We won’t go back.

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

Alternative history is always a weak argument. Always.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

You are here: Home / Politics / Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

by | 89 Comments

This post is in: , ,

I didn’t see Romney’s speech, but Hugh Hewitt did. I wonder if he liked it. Let’s check:

Mitt Romney’s “Faith in America” speech was simply magnificent, and anyone who denies it is not to be trusted as an analyst. On every level it was a masterpiece. The staging and Romney’s delivery, the eclipse of all other candidates it caused, the domination of the news cycle just prior to the start of absentee voting in New Hampshire on Monday –for all these reasons and more it will be long discussed as a masterpiece of political maneuver.

I guess that settles that. Now about that whole Harriet Miers nomination thing, Hugh…

*** Update ***

I’m not the only one. Self-parody is right.

*** Update #2 ***

What word was absent from Mitt’s speech?

Reader Interactions

89Comments

  1. 1.

    Cassidy

    Not having watched the speech, nor caring really, he is right about dominating the news cycles. That alone was a well done strategy.

  2. 2.

    demimondian

    Isn’t this the same Hewitt who was talking about G.W. Bush as an “underrated genius”? In fact, wasn’t the term “masterpiece” used to describe that gentleman’s foreign policy?

    If Romney is to Faith in America as GWB was to American foreign policy, we’ll reach _The Handmaid’s Tale_ sooner than I expect.

  3. 3.

    IanY77

    I don’t mean this as a “gotcha” (OK, maybe a little bit), but I was wondering, why now? Hewitt says, apparently with a straight face, that there is no anti-Mormon bigotry on the right, only the left. If that’s the case, why not wait until after the nomination is sewn up to make this speech?

    Of course, maybe HH is full of crap and there are some people in the “base” who will not vote Mormon under any circumstances (even if “that bitch” is the nominee).

    /to-may-to, to-mah-to

  4. 4.

    Psycheout

    Chrissy Matthews loved it too. I was blown away that some at Race 4 2008 were crowing about Chrissy liking it. As if Wiffleball’s host is an authority on anything.

    I read the speech. It was pretty bland. The only people who’d call it great are his cheering section and morons. Of course both are probably the same group of people.

  5. 5.

    Zifnab

    Of course, maybe HH is full of crap and there are some people in the “base” who will not vote Mormon under any circumstances (even if “that bitch” is the nominee).

    Ya think?

  9. 9.

    Svensker

    anyone who denies it is not to be trusted as an analyst.

    From the most trusted source in butt-kissing.

    At least HH’s enthusiastic about his enthusiasms. That counts for something, doesn’t it?

  12. 12.

    Davis X. Machina

    I thought the delivery was decidedly odd

    Weird emPHAses, and odd inTONations — like a phonetically memorized head-of-state conference speech.

    I guess I am untrustworthy as an analyst.

  13. 13.

    J sub D

    “Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom.”

    Mitt, go here and look at those on the top of the list. A bunch of dictatorships?

    I get sooo tired of people eqauting theism with freedom when historically it is the opposite.

  14. 14.

    cleek

    wow. you gotta read the comments below Hewitt’s post:

    “What a relief to find a candidate who can draw upon America’s deep well of timeless principles of liberty, one who can also articulate them. Dedication to these principles by past American presidents, those who truly understood them and believed them, have made them and those they have led in wartime invincible. Given Romney’s understanding of economic and business issues, I think he has emerged now as the GOP’s best hope.”

    —

    “I have not heard a speech of this caliber since Reagan. He delievered a perfect speech in an almost no win situation. I hope the anti-mormon’s community thirst for blood will be abated by a larger number of people who don’t just blindly vote evangelical. As a christian myself I will vote for Romney not because of his faith but because of the content of his character and his record. His real record not the one spinned by Huckabee anti-mormon campaign.”

    —

    “Not just a good head of hair, he is clearly for real. No fraud or faker could write or give that speech”

    —

    “The most inspiring speech from a Republican since Ronald Reagan.”

    —

    “Mitt Romney has made a wonderful speech, the first one I have heard that reminds me of Ronald Reagan. On radio it is stunning speech, and I think he is the best choice for the GOP…and a choice that can win.”

    —

    “It has certainly been decades since America has heard a speech of this calibur from a politician. This is historic.

    Other campaigns have been using religion to divide the race – and Mitt comes in as the uniting leader. He was by far more presidential than any ’08 candidate we have seen yet. ”

    —

    “Win, lose, or draw, Mitt Romney gave a speech today that will go down as one of the best political speeches in history. “

    anyone else getting a strong whiff of fake ?

  15. 15.

    Jake

    Good Lord in applesauce. I kept hearing loud, slobbery sucking noises as I read that.

    Someone please give Huge Spewitt a towel

  16. 16.

    Psycheout

    Of course, maybe HH is full of crap and there are some people in the “base” who will not vote Mormon under any circumstances (even if “that bitch” is the nominee).

    That’s a bit unfair. I’m not so sure I couldn’t vote for a Mormon. Orrin Hatch is a decent man, for example.

    Mitt, on the other hand, is such an opportunist and phony that his Mormonism doesn’t really come into the picture for me. His heretical religion is secondary.

    Mitt does not represent all Mormons, and his run isn’t a referendum on that kooky religion.

  17. 17.

    Brachiator

    Mitt Romney’s “Faith in America” speech was simply magnificent, and anyone who denies it is not to be trusted as an analyst. On every level it was a masterpiece.

    What a load of crap. Evidently, both Mitt the Kid and HH just got around to reading the Constitution yesterday, and are shocked, shocked, to find that there is no religious test for the presidency or other federal office, and want to share their discovery with everyone else. And then Mitt has the nerve to twist “no religious test” into “ain’t nobody here but us believers.”

    This hypocritical moron who is trying to softpedal his own Mormonism to fundamentalist cretins by pretending to defend religious freedom is the same doofus who insisted that “We need to have a person of faith lead the country,” way back on February 17, 2007.

    But no religious test means no religious test, of any kind, including a test of being religious vs being non-religious or entirely apathetic to the notion of any religion at all.

    Oh, yeah, the founders did not draft the pledge, and putting your hand on the Bible to take the Oath is NOT REQUIRED by the Constitution, the wording, “I swear…” is optional, and the concluding “… so help me God” (or Buddha or Allah or Muhammed) is an add-on by tradition, but not required.

    Hewitt is clearly not to be trusted as an analyst, and Mitt’s Apologia is nothing more than a craven attempt to pander to a politically ignorant and religiously obnoxious crowd of yahoos.

  18. 18.

    Psycheout

    As a christian myself I will vote for Romney not because of his faith but because of the content of his character and his record.

    To coin a phrase, LULWUT?!?

  19. 19.

    grumpy realist

    Someone pointed out that the problem with the speech is that, it just sounds like everything else Mitt has said, i.e., he’ll say anything to get elected and slithers all over everything.

    And it’s STILL not going to convince those who think that Mormonism is a cult.

  20. 20.

    Bombadil

    anyone else getting a strong whiff of fake ?

    I’m getting a strong whiff of something, all right.

  21. 21.

    RSA

    Mitt Romney’s “Faith in America” speech was simply magnificent, and anyone who denies it is not to be trusted as an analyst.

    Wow. I like the form of his argument: Here’s my opinion, and if you disagree you’re wrong. Thus Hugh Hewitt is an idiot, and anyone who denies it has his head up his ass.

  24. 24.

    Robert Johnston

    Just goes to show that Hewitt shouldn’t try to write while he’s multiply orgasming. So few words, so much ejaculate all over his keyboard. His new world record for most times masturbating to climax during a Mitt Romney speech will never, ever be broken.

  25. 25.

    Sensitive Pony Tailed Girly Man

    Hugh’s commentator who said that there was no way my man Willard M. could fake it obviously hasn’t been paying attention. The unkind might say Willard is Sociopathic in the ease in which he can fake anything. I like to think that he’s just especially good at what he does. I took a bite out of a Ham Sandwich once, only to discover that it was Willard, faking one. He’s good. Really good.

  28. 28.

    Psycheout

    More wishful thinking about “the speech.”

    Did Romney accomplish his mission? Provided here (in my opinion) is a play-by-play outline of the major parts of the speech.

    If Romney wins the election, this will be the moment we will look back on as the final push.

    That’s a big if, buddy. Because he won’t. This speech will be forgotten sooner than…

    Hey, what am I talking about?

    Yep, it’ll be that quick.

  29. 29.

    Ed Drone

    I think the speech (“TEH SPEECH?”) is actually going to be in the lead balloon category, and it certainly was not aimed at the majority of Americans, just the rightest-tightest of the religious rightards, who are not likely to vote for Mitt anyway.

    That said, it just occurred to me — if Mitt gets the nod, who will he choose for his Jeff?

    Ed

  30. 30.

    Grand Moff Texan

    An empty windsock like Romney cannot be a credible messenger to restore the cynical use of vapid bullshit religious rhetoric that was so powerful before 2006, when “Values Voters” walked away from Republicans after learning they’d been had.

    The man believes nothing. He is absolutely the worse standard bearer for the GOP if they are to get back to using decoy issues like God! Guns! Gays! to distract people while they rip them off.

    That it would take a national candidate slurring our Constitution and history, substituting a skygod he doesn’t believe in for simple human accountability, should be terrifying to everyone. These people hate our country and want to “return” it to something it never was. When he says that freedom comes from God and not limited government, it’s the sound of cynical theocracy liberating itself from accountability. It’s the definition of tyranny, but fortunately, Romney is so much of a joke that it has to backfire.
    .

  31. 31.

    cleek

    here’s Our Lady Of Perpetual Outrage:

    “For me, it’s simple. Any day a Republican can turn the tables on the ‘tolerance’ squad and cast light on our great American tradition of religious liberty is a good day.”

    December 6, 2007 — a date which will live in infamy — the United Forces Of Straw was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the combined rhetorical forces of the Empire of Perpetual Outrage.

  32. 32.

    Jen

    Americans watching the speech were listening to a great communicator talk with pride and obvious skill and passion about America and its long history of freedom. This is a much loved and too infrequent thing: An American leader talking with unashamed love and reverence for the country and its shining tradition of tolerance and fierce attachment to liberty.

    If you squint really, really, hard, you can see Reagan, naw, ok, you can’t.

    I have an unashamed love and reverence for my country. I put the flag out on all the patriotic holidays, including Flag Day, because I’ll be damned if I’m gonna let the wingnuts monopolize it and make it the equivalent of GWB when really he is the antithesis of what America stands for. It’s sort of a protest that wraps all the way around again, like when goth kids go pink.

    But can I just say that Americans leaders talking with love about their country is about a rare as air molecules? Lincoln was the best, Bush is the worst, but they *all* do it more or less whenever they talk. Are these guys just excited about a potential President who might be able to give a speech without getting completely dumbfounded by the English language four seconds into it?

  33. 33.

    Faux News

    I guess we have our new Fred Barnes when Hugh Hewit pens his future book called “Mormon Rebel in Chief” for the Mittens Prezidency.

    Shorter HH: “I can haz More-man for Prezident”?

  34. 34.

    PaulW

    Hugh Hewitt’s gushing should have included little hearts drawn into the margins just like in those middle school OMG notes 6th grade girls pass to each other.

    Ever see that movie “The Village,” where one girl goes up to Joaquim Phoenix and starts gushing unabashedly about how much in love she was with him “I LOVE YOU I LOVE YOU!”. I swear to my Unitarian God, I heard that voice in the back of my mind as I read HH’s love letter.

    So, Hugh, when’s the wedding?

  36. 36.

    Davis X. Machina

    The man believes nothing.

    Not strictly true – -he believes he should be President.

    Ordinary Presidents run because they want to be someone, extraordinary Presidents run because they want to do something.

  37. 37.

    Grand Moff Texan

    So, Hugh, when’s the wedding?

    There’s not going to be a wedding. Hugh already put out.
    .

  38. 38.

    Svensker

    “Not just a good head of hair”

    Since we’ve been asked not to use “LOL” anymore as too jejeune, please insert more sophisticated laugh symbol here.

  39. 39.

    Mike S

    Baby Hewy is one of the funniest, and most pathetic, talkers out there. For someone so proud of his “Christian Values” his combination of Idolitry, The GOP, and bearing false wittness, every word out of his mouth, is astounding.

  42. 42.

    ThymeZone

    What word was missing?

    “Shall,” as in:

    “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States”

    Not “should,” as in we “kinda sort should not really pick presidents on the basis of religion,” which was Mitt’s faux theme, since he really meant, you should pick me because even though I practice a fucked up cult religion I am really a morally superior values guy like you are.

    No religious shall be required. Period. The end. Shut the fuck up and stop telling us how fucking religious you are you lying sack of shit.

    Is that sort of what we were looking for?

  43. 43.

    NickM

    Mitt’s sycophants forget that well-remembered speeches seldom are exercises in stupendous ass-kissery. But if they remembered that, they wouldn’t be sycophants in the first place.

  44. 44.

    Tsulagi

    The only people who’d call it great are his cheering section and morons.

    I dunno, I might think Missourians for Mitt might like it, and also call his candidacy great. Don’t Mormons think the Garden of Eden was in Missouri. Mitt becomes prez think of the possibilities. A giant amusement park: EveLand. Missouri could finally have some tourism instead of being a flyover state.

  46. 46.

    Psycheout

    I dunno, I might think Missourians for Mitt might like it, and also call his candidacy great.

    Uh, I think “Missourians for Mitt” would probably be part of that cheering section I referenced. Otherwise I agree with you.

    Actually “____ for Mitt” usually denotes members of OvenMitt’s cheering section.

  48. 48.

    Rick Taylor

    From Mitt Romney’s speecth:

    There are some who would have a presidential candidate describe and explain his church’s distinctive doctrines. To do so would enable the very religious test the founders prohibited in the Constitution. No candidate should become the spokesman for his faith. For if he becomes President he will need the prayers of the people of all faiths.
    . . .
    “There is one fundamental question about which I often am asked. What do I believe about Jesus Christ? I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind.

    So in one breath, Romney says the President shouldn’t describe and explain the distinctive doctrines of his church because he’s the President of peoples of all faith, and in another he says I believe Jesus is the messiah and the son of God, so you fundamentalists out there should have no trouble voting for me because I agree with you on what’s important. My church may have some distinctive doctrines which are unimportant and which I will not comment on, but it’s not like I’m a Jew or an atheist after all– I believe Jesus is the one true savior. He throws out plenty of other bones for the fundamentalists, freedom requires religion, judges have to respect the foundation of faith our constitution is based on for our greatness to endure, etc.

    The contradiction is bald; the hypocrisy and self-serving opportunism is stunning. He simultaneously attempts to inoculate himself against religious litmust tests and to exploit them. It’s breath taking.

    John, you’re hard on Hillary, accusing her of cynical triangulation opportunism, but is there anything she’s said that even approaches what Romney’s done in this one speech?

    Kevin Drum has more.

  49. 49.

    ThymeZone

    There’s never been a civilization that has rewritten what marriage and family means and survived.

    As quoted on DKos, and as said by Mike Huckabee.

    Why do we bother parsing the words of these motherfuckers?

  51. 51.

    Robert Johnston

    Why do we bother parsing the words of these motherfuckers?

    To determine whether they’re insane or lying. A lot can ride on that determination, especially if the next Congress passes some universal medical insurance coverage plan that includes care for mental health.

    Of course I can’t really think of a reason other than that.

  53. 53.

    Ted

    Why do we bother parsing the words of these motherfuckers?

    Because they want to have lots of power over our lives.

  54. 54.

    Jake

    Why do we bother parsing the words of these motherfuckers?

    Because we can’t shove them feet first into wood chippers.

    I suppose old Huck (motherhucker?) wants to go back to the good old days when women and children were chattel, reverse Loving v. Virgina and nuke Mass.

  56. 56.

    grumpy realist

    I’m reminded of a choice quote from Thomas Beer about American politicians “invoking Christ with the freedom of medieval kings in a brawl over the borders.”

    Of course, he WAS talking about the shenanigans of the 1890s.

    Ah well, it looks like every N years the US goes nuts though another typical spasm of religious fervour.

    I’m surprised that one of Mitt’s rivals hasn’t been handing out copies of Sherlock Holmes’ The Sign of Four to voters.. Jes’ a nice little piece of litterachur, right? Nothin’ else at all…

  57. 57.

    Toolshed

    Ted Says:

    His heretical religion is secondary.

    Fuck off, bigoted asshole.

    If I make fun of stupid people, its not bigotry. Mormons are stupid. Now you may be arguing that we’re making fun of retards in which case you may have a point but you would also probably be retarded yourself.

  58. 58.

    Robert Johnston

    Why do we bother parsing the words of these motherfuckers?

    Because we can’t shove them feet first into wood chippers.

    Sure we can. However, extremely unlike Mitt, just because we can do something obviously righteous and more than a bit sanctimonious that would feel great in the moment but have messy consequences doesn’t mean we will do so or that we expect such actions to be given legal blessing.

    If I thought it OK to mix my religion with my state, I’d be filling that requisition for your wood chipper right now.

  59. 59.

    incontrolados

    Mike Huckabee states his rise in the polls can only be attributed to divine intervention.

    Michael Medved is going to be pissed since he took credit for that today.

    I’m a little bummed — Hewitt isn’t on the air today — he’s got Mark Stein in subbing for him. Stein’s first guest? Dean Barnett! And later, Rich Lowry, J-Pod, and Jonah Goldberg — who will have a book out any day!

    Even some like me, who is immune to the wingnut — I might have to turn it off.

  61. 61.

    Zifnab

    OMG —Mark Stein wants to ‘muss’ Mitt’s! hair up a bit because, ya know, Mitt! looks a little too presidential at times . . .

    Ye gods. Just get these people a room already. Or at least designate them a bathroom in Minnesota. Is it physically possible for these people to come off with a higher degree of PDA?

  63. 63.

    4tehlulz

    If I thought it OK to mix my religion with my state, I’d be filling that requisition for your wood chipper right now.

    Don’t worry about that with Mitt. He’s all about cash. The last time I checked, Mormons didn’t approve of selling liquor on Sunday or expanding lotteries, which Romney has done in MA.

  64. 64.

    myiq2xu

    Mitt Romney’s “Faith in America” speech was simply magnificent, and anyone who denies it is not to be trusted as an analyst.

    I think he mean analist. As in butt-kisser.

  65. 65.

    jnfr

    Are these guys just excited about a potential President who might be able to give a speech without getting completely dumbfounded by the English language four seconds into it?

    I suspect there’s a lot of truth to this statement.

  66. 66.

    Ted

    If I make fun of stupid people, its not bigotry. Mormons are stupid.

    I wasn’t talking about that. It’s always fun to make fun of religions. What I was talking about is one bible-thumper telling another, slightly different bible-thumper that their religion is “heretical”. It’s bigoted, even if it’s also hilarious to observe.

  67. 67.

    incontrolados

    They are trying to connect up Romney with both Reagan and JFK.

    Reagan = card reader aka great communicator

    JKF = goal that republicans think they can reach with Reagan worship.

    Romney = both?

    The math is simple.

    (Sorry the ass’ name is spelled Steyn)

  68. 68.

    Cain

    Mike Huckabee states his rise in the polls can only be attributed to divine intervention.

    God seems to have His priorities messed up. Apparently, Huckabee is more important than Georgia. Shouldn’t He be answering the governor’s request for rain instead? If I was the governor I would be outraged.

    cain

  69. 69.

    Chad N. Freude

    I haven’t read through all of the comments, but I don’t think anyone has mentioned the second paragraph of Hewitt’s orgasmic response to Romney’s speech:

    Far more important than all of that, however, was the content of the address, which was a brilliant explication of the American political theory of faith and freedom. … the American tradition of faith in the public square, of vigorous and valued religious plurality, and, crucially, why that tradition has allowed America’s role in the world to be so unqualifiedly good. The unexpected but brilliant connection of our tradition of religious liberty with our ability to move in the world to save it again and again from evil and to rebuild it without demands for territory or treasure …

    Unqualifiedly good, as in the unqualified good we have brought to Iraq.
    Repeatedly saving the world from evil like we did in Vietnam and … rebuild[ing] it without demands for territory or treasure or oil or exclusive rights to profitable business.
    The only limitation on our perfection is the inability to do anything wrong (because of our Judaeo-Christian-only faith).

  70. 70.

    Chad N. Freude

    Re

    the American political theory of faith and freedom

    I must have been out the day that was covered in my PoliSci and American History courses.

  71. 71.

    Chad N. Freude

    And in the third paragraph (this is obviously a typo, but it’s hilarious):

    Did Romany convert anti-Mormon fanatics or secular absolutists?

    Yes, it turned them into Gypsies.

  72. 72.

    PaulW

    I got a question: when will a politician develop the balls to stand up and say “Suck it, Christians! Next one of you whines about this being a godly nation, I’m gonna pass a law making us all Buddhists!”

  73. 73.

    Delia

    Well, way back when I was in high school I learned that America was a godly nation that had never lost a war because God was our side or we were on God’s side or something. Of course, I went to high school in Utah, so I felt free to skip Mitty’s speech, since it’s probably still pounding around in my lizard brain somewhere. Anyhow, I went to high school during the Vietnam War, so I’m not sure how the whole victory thing came out. Maybe we declared victory and left. Personally, I think God finally got fed up with us for being a bunch of arrogant dolts who didn’t know when to leave other folks alone, so now she’s sticking us with a lot of no good Gooper idiots who can’t talk their ways out of paper bags and are busy trashing the country until there’s nothing left.

  75. 75.

    incontrolados

    when will a politician develop the balls to stand up

    I don’t generally have a problem with the Christians (my family are all at least sort of there — so I’m not waiting for the God to finally get out of politics.

    Minimum I’m hoping for is that people vote on policy. (Even though I know that’s complicated.)

    Wait, no, minimum, Hugh’s guy goes down in flames. Yeah, that will do it for me in the short term.

  77. 77.

    grumpy realist

    Gaaah…after reading Hugh’s second paragraph, I want to beat his brains out with a copy of Thomas Paine.

  79. 79.

    Johnny Pez

    Are these guys just excited about a potential President who might be able to give a speech without getting completely dumbfounded by the English language four seconds into it?

    Yes.

    SATSQ

  81. 81.

    STEVEinSC

    A question for Mitt:

    Let’s see, Mormonism is built on Christianity, which in turn is built on Judaism.

    Jewish god= Their god allows 6 million to be killed without intervention.

    Christians= Their god is supposed to call for thousands of co-religionists burned at the stake, hundreds of thousands killed in crusades and fratricidal holy wars.

    Mormons= (New guys in the con game) Their god demands blood atonement and hundreds of Christians are murdered at Mountain Meadows.

    Yeah, we really want to be guided by people of religion with their belief in god? (How have we regressed so far since the Founding Fathers?)

  82. 82.

    r€nato

    Let’s see, Mormonism is built on Christianity, which in turn is built on Judaism.

    no way! Jesus came before everything!

    /the view

  83. 83.

    quickdraw

    What word was absent from Mitt’s speech?

    Cain?

    As in curse of? He probably wants to play down that particular LDS tenet.

  85. 85.

    Rich

    Mormons require a blood atonement?

    I’m completely offended at such blatant ignorance! I am Mormon and we consider this idea completely apostate. It was an issue among a group of people in the early days of the church that were excommunicated and and severely denounced for advocating this practice.

    Stop perpetuating such excruciating ignorance about the LDS Church.

  87. 87.

    skip

    NYRB has recent article suggesting that some Mormon “seeding” practices are currently finding favor among zealots in the West Bank.

    Is that a form of perpetuating ignorance as well? My ancestors in Iowa, near Nauvoo, kept diaries.

  88. 88.

    J sub D

    His heretical religion is secondary.

    Fuck off, bigoted asshole.

    Ahem. If you haven’t noticed, ALL RELIGIONS were started by heretics. Jesus was a heritical Jew, Martin Luther was a heretical catholic, David Koresh was a heretical Seventh Day Adventist, etc.

    Am I a bigot for pointing out the obvious?

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks