• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

After roe, women are no longer free.

A Senator Walker would be an insult to the state and the nation.

Everybody saw this coming.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

A Senator Walker would also be an insult to reason, rationality, and decency.

Come on, man.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Infrastructure week. at last.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

Eh, that’s media spin. biden’s health is fine and he’s doing a good job.

You cannot shame the shameless.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

We still have time to mess this up!

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Republicans in disarray!

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / War on Terror / War on Terror aka GSAVE® / 17 Years For Padilla

17 Years For Padilla

by John Cole|  January 22, 20084:35 pm| 57 Comments

This post is in: War on Terror aka GSAVE®, Republican Crime Syndicate - aka the Bush Admin.

FacebookTweetEmail

The terrorist mastermind, Jose Padilla, gets seventeen years:

Jose Padilla, once accused of plotting with al-Qaida to blow up a radioactive “dirty bomb,” was sentenced Tuesday to 17 years and four months on terrorism conspiracy charges that don’t mention those initial allegations.

The sentence imposed by U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke marks another step in the extraordinary personal and legal odyssey for the 37-year- old Muslim convert, a U.S. citizen who was held for 3 1/2 years as an enemy combatant after his 2002 arrest amid the “dirty bomb” allegations. He had faced up to life in prison.

Cooke said she was giving Padilla some credit—over the objections of federal prosecutors—for his lengthy military detention at a Navy brig in South Carolina. She agreed with defense lawyers that Padilla was subjected to “harsh conditions” and “extreme environmental stresses” while there.

I don’t think there is any way to interpret this sentence other than as a rebuke to the government, who had been asking for life while insisting Padilla is a grave threat (yet, conveniently, never presented any evidence of that threat).

The article continues:

But Cooke said that as serious as the conspiracy was, there was no evidence linking the men to specific acts of terrorism anywhere.

“There is no evidence that these defendants personally maimed, kidnapped or killed anyone in the United States or elsewhere,” she said.

ACTIVIST JUDGE!

Civil liberties groups and Padilla’s lawyers called his detention unconstitutional for someone born in this country and contended that he was only charged criminally because the Supreme Court appeared poised to order him either charged or released.

Jurors in the criminal case never heard Padilla’s full history, which according to U.S. officials included a graduation from the al-Qaida terror camp, a plot to detonate the “dirty bomb” and a plot to fill apartments with natural gas and blow them up. Much of what Padilla supposedly told interrogators during his long detention as an enemy combatant could not be used in court because he had no access to a lawyer and was not read his constitutional rights.

Padilla’s lawyers argued for a lenient sentence, in part because of his minor role in the conspiracy that was the subject of last year’s trial and because of claims that he was mistreated and tortured while he was held at a Navy brig in Charleston, S.C. U.S. officials denied those claims repeatedly.

I don’t know what the real story of Padilla’s involvement (if any) in this mess might be, and since most everything we do know was obtained while torturing the man, I doubt we ever will. I suspect that in the future, when cooler heads look back at this disgraceful period in our nation’s history, the alleged villainous treachery of Jose Padilla will be greatly overshadowed by the outrageous treatment he received and the dishonest and bumbling campaign to subvert the law while attempting to publicly convict him. The real story is not Jose Padilla, who for all we know may actually have been dangerous, but who is now, courtesy of the Bush administration, a broken and mentally deficient mess. The real story will be of the little men who, in moments of great patriotic fervor, decided it was up to them to destroy our nation’s principles in order to save us all.

History will not look kindly on those pikers.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « RIP, The Thompson Campaign (aka, The Great White Nope)
Next Post: RIP Heath Ledger »

Reader Interactions

57Comments

  1. 1.

    Bob In Pacifica

    January 22, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    I will sleep in safety tonight.

  2. 2.

    Dug Jay

    January 22, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    “…Jose Padilla, who for all we know may actually have been dangerous, but who is now, courtesy of the Bush administration, a broken and mentally deficient mess”.

    Oh, Boo Hoo Hoo.

  3. 3.

    Punchy

    January 22, 2008 at 4:45 pm

    She agreed with defense lawyers that Padilla was subjected to “harsh conditions” and “extreme environmental stresses” while there.

    And yet the Amendment outlawing “cruel and unusual punishment” was completely ignored for this trial.

    Not to mention an Amendment concerning being held without charges….rights to a lawyer….People keep forgetting — this guy was an American citizen.

  4. 4.

    Incertus (Brian)

    January 22, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    History will not look kindly on those pikers.

    It will if they’re allowed to write the narrative the way they have in the past.

  5. 5.

    les

    January 22, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    The real story is not Jose Padilla, who for all we know may actually have been dangerous, but who is now, courtesy of the Bush administration, a broken and mentally deficient mess.

    AKA victory.

  6. 6.

    GSD

    January 22, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    American shmamerican. He could have blowed up the whole country.

    How can you enjoy tax cuts when you’re blowed up?

    -GSD

  7. 7.

    Caidence (fmr. Chris)

    January 22, 2008 at 4:51 pm

    “…Jose Padilla, who for all we know may actually have been dangerous, but who is now, courtesy of the Bush administration, a broken and mentally deficient mess”.

    Oh, Boo Hoo Hoo.

    Everyone should listen to Dug Jay.

    He knows exactly what it’s like to be a mentally deficient mess, says it ain’t that bad.

    Dug Jay: after you get locked in an isolation tank for days at a time over a period of five years, then you can talk. For now, just walk away and pick on convicts whining that their peanut butter isn’t the organic, chunky kind.
    Padilla’s one of the exceptions where government stupidity cancelled out a good deal of his own.

  8. 8.

    Caidence (fmr. Chris)

    January 22, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    And yet the Amendment outlawing “cruel and unusual punishment” was completely ignored for this trial.

    Wasn’t ignored. You don’t apply the amendment to the charges, only the evidence in the trial, thus preventing the government from profiting. Most of the government’s case got hobbled because of that crap.

    Now, when civil or criminal suit is brought against the gov’t, THEN you get to bring out said amendment for punishment’s sake.

    /plays Summon Myiq2xu card

  9. 9.

    Bubblegum Tate

    January 22, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    ACTIVIST JUDGE!

    Clearly–she didn’t even offer to personally execute him with the American flag!

    I don’t know what the real story of Padilla’s involvement (if any) in this mess might be

    All you need to know is that he’s an Al Qaeda terrorist. That’s all the wingnutosphere seems to know.

  10. 10.

    Zifnab

    January 22, 2008 at 4:56 pm

    Jurors in the criminal case never heard Padilla’s full history, which according to U.S. officials included a graduation from the al-Qaida terror camp, a plot to detonate the “dirty bomb” and a plot to fill apartments with natural gas and blow them up. Much of what Padilla supposedly told interrogators during his long detention as an enemy combatant could not be used in court because he had no access to a lawyer and was not read his constitutional rights.

    To take a page from Dug Jay:

    Oh, Boo Hoo Hoo.

    Since when does a jury need to hear “history” and “testimony” to convict a terrorist of terrorism? I don’t know where they found these Osama-kissing, America-hating, liberal, jihadist, wackos, but I do know 12 people who’s phones should be getting tapped extensively by the NSA real soon.

    The fact that a radical Islamofascist got off with such a light sentence when our President was adamant in seeing him permanently detained just seems to prove that the criminal justice system is insufficient for prosecuting known terrorist murdering scum that hate America for her Freedoms.

    When we get hit by another nuclear Iranian-sponsored terror attack, at least we’ll know who to blame.

  11. 11.

    Davebo

    January 22, 2008 at 5:00 pm

    You don’t apply the amendment to the charges, only the evidence in the trial, thus preventing the government from profiting. Most of the government’s case got hobbled because of that crap.

    That’s putting a lot more faith in this government than I’m willing to do.

    Government: OK, we didn’t convict on the dirty bomb but we could have if the judge would have allowed the evidence.

    Skeptic: Well, the trials over now so what the heck, show us what you’ve got.

    Government: We can’t do that.

    Skeptic: Why? Because it would show he was tortured? What did you do to him?

    Government: We can’t tell you, it will teach other terrorists how to avoid succumbing to the sensation of drowning.. somehow.

  12. 12.

    Caidence (fmr. Chris)

    January 22, 2008 at 5:09 pm

    That’s putting a lot more faith in this government than I’m willing to do.

    That’s ok. While this mechanism doesn’t seem to work on a humanitarian level, it works purely on a business level.

    If a lawyer and his police entourage have a limited budget and limited time to convict, and they’ve been taught over and over again that courts won’t let them submit evidence with out a chain of custody form (that would reveal torturous practices), then the lawyer rationally chooses the not-so-fun-yet-proven way of conviction.

    Punishing the dickhead for trying torture is only icing on the cake.

    Also, don’t forget that this was a (very very evil and treasonous) experiment to see if they could do whatever they want to whomever they want, even citizens. So, not only was this demonically exceptional, but it also failed so far, with the rest of the results in limbo.

    I breathe slightly easier when I hear the Padilla judge’s statements.

  13. 13.

    Bubblegum Tate

    January 22, 2008 at 5:10 pm

    The fact that a radical Islamofascist got off with such a light sentence when our President was adamant in seeing him permanently detained just seems to prove that the criminal justice system is insufficient for prosecuting known terrorist murdering scum that hate America for her Freedoms.

    How long before some winger makes this point seriously instead of sarcastically? 10 minutes?

  14. 14.

    Punchy

    January 22, 2008 at 5:11 pm

    Wasn’t ignored. You don’t apply the amendment to the charges, only the evidence in the trial, thus preventing the government from profiting. Most of the government’s case got hobbled because of that crap.

    Now, when civil or criminal suit is brought against the gov’t, THEN you get to bring out said amendment for punishment’s sake.

    I realized that after I posted it. What I meant wasn’t so much that the Amendment was ignored, but that the case should have been tossed due to the completely illegal nature of his confinement and incarceration (more 4th than 8th)

  15. 15.

    Tsulagi

    January 22, 2008 at 5:17 pm

    look back at this disgraceful period in our nation’s history, the alleged villainous treachery of Jose Padilla will be greatly overshadowed by the outrageous treatment he received and the dishonest and bumbling campaign to subvert the law

    Yep.

    The real story will be of the gutless little men who, in moments of great patriotic fervor, decided it was up to them to destroy our nation’s principles

    Apparently IOKIYAR. That’s also on the underside of their Purple Heart bandaids.

  16. 16.

    Gregory

    January 22, 2008 at 5:18 pm

    History Prosecutors will not look kindly on those pikers

    Fixed.

  17. 17.

    Caidence (fmr. Chris)

    January 22, 2008 at 5:18 pm

    but that the case should have been tossed due to the completely illegal nature of his confinement and incarceration (more 4th than 8th)

    That’s the beauty of the thoroughness of the system. They popped out all the unfair one’s and kept the fair ones. Dickhead started messing around with bad people, and they got clean evidence for 17 years worth of Stupid. Now nobody of any decent moral stature can say we let this slip. Torture may have to be punished, but it shouldn’t punish innocent Americans by letting a known-asshole back on the street when you have clean evidence not to.

    (Can you tell I’m perfectly happy with how this went so far?)

  18. 18.

    daleyrocks

    January 22, 2008 at 5:20 pm

    I don’t think there is any way to interpret this sentence other than as a rebuke to the government

    The rebukey thing to the government might have been had the jury acquitted him in the first place. They didn’t. Juries found him and two others guilty of conspiracy to commit terrorism.

    Sour grapes over a sentence twice as long as the defense was requesting doesn’t sound like a victory for Padilla.

  19. 19.

    mantis

    January 22, 2008 at 5:24 pm

    Who nominated this liberal activist judge, anyway? I’ll bet it was the Clenis! Checking…..

    Nominated by George W. Bush on November 25, 2003

    Oops. Clearly she must have brainwashed by some Islamofascist Svengali.

  20. 20.

    Jake

    January 22, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    You know, I heard a high-pitched squealing and thought my PC was about to croak. Now I know it is the outraged shrieks of the fRighties.

    OK, bets.

    Which Code Brown Pants blogger will be the first to:
    -Call Cooke a traitor.
    -Point out that the libs must be rejoicing.
    -Blame Cooke for the tarrist attacks that are sure to result from this.
    -Say she ought to be sent to Gitmo.
    -Notice she was appointed by Dubya.

  21. 21.

    r€nato

    January 22, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    Padilla still got 17 years; he was certainly not an innocent soul.

    I think the real victory here is that the criminal justice system is indeed up to the task of prosecuting terrorists as well as would-be terrorists; we don’t need star chamber trials and illegal detention.

  22. 22.

    troubled

    January 22, 2008 at 5:30 pm

    and we still have the raw, gaping and yet inscrutable sore that is Gitmo. Accumulate enough hypocrisy and it becomes a big bright beaming symbol and it creates enemies where there were none

    http://tshirtinsurgency.com/guantanamo-bay-t-shirt

  23. 23.

    Will Winters

    January 22, 2008 at 5:33 pm

    What has always bothered me about the Padilla case was the lack of Constitutional Due Process.

    I don’t know the exact charges against Padilla, but I do know he is a U.S. citizen, regardless of his crime he should be protected by the constitution. Instead, the government declared him an enemy combatant and, bam, he is no longer protected by the Constitution.

    Think about that for a second – almost anyone can be declared an enemy combatant and due process no longer applied to you. Very, very scary.

    Will
    http://www.liberatenow.net

  24. 24.

    George B.

    January 22, 2008 at 5:35 pm

    Off-topic, but Heath Ledger was just found dead.

    That’s a fucking shame. He was a great actor.

  25. 25.

    Incertus (Brian)

    January 22, 2008 at 5:36 pm

    I think the real victory here is that the criminal justice system is indeed up to the task of prosecuting terrorists as well as would-be terrorists; we don’t need star chamber trials and illegal detention.

    But would it have been up to the challenge if Padilla had gotten a speedy trial, instead of being held in limbo for three and a half years? Or would this one have blown up like the Liberty Seven trial?

  26. 26.

    Bubblegum Tate

    January 22, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    Oops. Clearly she must have brainwashed by some Islamofascist Svengali.

    She communicated with Padilla via a system of blinks!

  27. 27.

    grumpy realist

    January 22, 2008 at 5:42 pm

    I am constantly amazed that a horde of idiots who proudly call themselves “conservative” think nothing of throwing out 1000 years of Western Law traditions because they’re so damned scared of the “terraists.”

    Conservatives my ass. Bed-wetting goose-stepping authoritarians, more like.

  28. 28.

    Cyrus

    January 22, 2008 at 5:44 pm

    Will he be eligible for parole? Not that the “fruits of the poisonous tree” doctrine would come up in a parole hearing, or for that matter, should come up.

    Attorneys for (Padilla’s co-defendants) argued that any assistance they provided overseas was for peaceful purposes and to help persecuted Muslims in violent countries. But FBI agents testified that their charitable work was a cover for violent jihad, which they frequently discussed in code using words such as “tourism” and “football.”

    That reminds me of Dr. Strangelove somehow. “We know they’re evil precisely because they’re talking about such normal stuff!” Or maybe it’s Jonah Goldberg.

  29. 29.

    Caidence (fmr. Chris)

    January 22, 2008 at 5:44 pm

    -Call Cooke a traitor.

    One of the shrill ones… Malkin.

    -Point out that the libs must be rejoicing.

    Shrill, but lib hater. Does Hinderaker fit that?

    -Blame Cooke for the tarrist attacks that are sure to result from this.

    One of the diaper-wearing children constantly hiding under their desk… umm… Hannity, probably. I’m sure there are far more that don’t warrant my knowing they exist.

    -Say she ought to be sent to Gitmo.

    Easy headline. Has to be Limbaugh.

    -Notice she was appointed by Dubya.

    Oh that’s easy. Umm… uhhhhhhh---does not compute. system halt---

  30. 30.

    Sinister eyebrow

    January 22, 2008 at 5:46 pm

    It’s a disgrace that it was even allowed to go to trial. The government violated every basic premise of due process from unlawful detention, denial of the right to counsel, denial of Miranda rights and denial of the right to a speedy trial to violation of multiple federal bars against torture to witholding evidence from the defense that could serve to mitigate or exonerate the charges against the defendant. Violations of federal statute, 4th, 5th, 6th 8th and 14th amendments…how is this in any way an acceptable way for a government to conduct itself with regards to anyone, let alone one of its own citizens?

    For anyone who thinks that its fine that Padilla was tried and sentenced but the Judge made a snarky comment so it’s all better because of a look of stern disapproval and a wagged finger at the prosecution, I’m telling you it’s not okay. That this was done to Padilla, whether he was a bad guy or not, means that it can be done to you, your child, your parent, or your spouse. Would a snarky disapproving comment from the Judge satisfy you that justice was done when the government violated essentially every fundamental principle of fairness and due process if it was your kid that got tortured, held incommunicado for years, and then tried on illegally obtained evidence and sentenced to 17 years of hard time?

    Utter disgrace hardly begins to cover it.

  31. 31.

    Face

    January 22, 2008 at 5:51 pm

    think the real victory here is that the criminal justice system is indeed up to the task of prosecuting terrorists as well as would-be terrorists;

    Damn, incertus beat me to it. Exactly. They didn’t even prosecute his ass for the friggin reason they locked him up!

    Next time you get arrested for DUI, see what happens to your case if they lock you away for 3 years, then try and prosecute you for attempted manslaughter. Judge tosses that like a salad.

    But for some reason, if you remove “DUI” and replace it with “made some bad friends overseas”, the whole 4th Amendment gets chucked.

  32. 32.

    Caidence (fmr. Chris)

    January 22, 2008 at 5:56 pm

    the whole 4th Amendment gets chucked.

    It got chucked in this case because the administration was stonewalling and the court had to follow procedure. Don’t think the court fucked this one up, they played it by the book, even if they could’ve rebuked the gov’t a little better.

    The next time this happens, the stonewalling will be far harder to do, and the court will have it’s eyes on the clock.

  33. 33.

    Caidence (fmr. Chris)

    January 22, 2008 at 6:05 pm

    See, I think we should be happy about this. Here’s the tally I got:

    – When The Missing Link Bush decided to shit all over Habeas Corpus, he did so on the back of an attempted terrorist. Lucky.
    – When the administration tried to get in bullshit evidence, it was rejected. Success.
    – When the administration tried to proceed without the bullshit evidence, the unsupported charges were rejected. Success.
    – When the administration stonewalled it, the court didn’t buckle. Success.
    – The court took notice of what was known about Padilla’s detention and rebuked it. Success.
    – The court set a precedent for this attempt of prolonged detention. Success.
    – The court still sent an attempted-terrorist to jail for longer than a decade. Success.

    I’m liking this particular court.

    The Court of Appeals DC district has me fucking scared, though.

  34. 34.

    Ellison, Ellensburg, Ellers, and Lambchop

    January 22, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    I don’t know what the real story of Padilla’s involvement (if any) in this mess might be, and since most everything we do know was obtained while torturing the man, and as such should be deemed unreliable.

    Yeah, it is awfully difficult to figure it out, if you are severely retarded.

    Oh, I know, Jose was just a innocent little gangbanging convicted murderer who converted to The Religion Of Peace. And like all poor, downtrodden, ex-con converts, he managed to somehow obtain plane tickets to Egypt, Yemen, and Pakistan, where he happened upon some weary travelers who turned out to be Al Qaeda trainers! What a coincidence! After signing his name on documents which I’m sure he didn’t know were Al Qaeda applications (!), this peaceful Muslim whitewashed his American passport (hmmmm, why would he want to get rid of those travel stamps?), left his pregnant wife (his second one — the first, American wife was left in the US after he converted) and headed off for Afghanistan to live with Al Qaeda for a year. To teach English. Even though he barely spoke it himself. Even though he was a high school dropout.

    So he returned to America in 2002 like any other returning citizen, carrying his shaving kit, a couple magazines… over $10,000 in U.S. currency given to him by his al Qaeda handlers (you never know when you might not be able to find an ATM!)… a cell phone provided to him by Khalid Shaikh Mohammed’s right-hand man… and the e-mail address for AQ baddie Amar al-Beluki.

    So the first question is: How far up your own ass must your head be to search for excuses for a murderer/traitor/terrorist?

    The other question is: What have we learned from the Padilla trial? Answer: Better to kill them than to try them. And think: If dead, he would’ve been spared the harsh treatment that left him a (sob!) broken Al Qaeda operative mess.

  35. 35.

    Caidence (fmr. Chris)

    January 22, 2008 at 6:21 pm

    See, I think we should be happy about this.

    (ugh.. formatting didn’t work AT ALL. Sorry ’bout that.)

  36. 36.

    Dennis - SGMM

    January 22, 2008 at 6:32 pm

    So the first question is: How far up your own ass must your head be to search for excuses for a murderer/traitor/terrorist to make you willing to throw away the Fourth and Fifth Amendments on the word of proven liars?

    Fixt

  37. 37.

    Tsulagi

    January 22, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    How far up your own ass must your head be to search for excuses

    You got pretty far up with your post, but what’s your record?

  38. 38.

    4tehlulz

    January 22, 2008 at 8:12 pm

    Better to kill them than to try them.

    Go for it.

  39. 39.

    Lawrence

    January 22, 2008 at 8:19 pm

    History will not look kindly on those pikers.

    I dunno, looking at the rehabilitation that the ghosts of Stalin and Lenin are seeing out east, I suspect Putin’s buddy, Dubya’s face will replace Mt. Rushmore.

    I’m worried that all Dubya really did was open the floodgates through which all the other totalitarian/authoritarian types will wander through (Huckabee/Hillary/McCain…etc…)

    And hell, can you really fault anyone but us Americans, hell, even Jesse Helms got freaked out when Dubya tried to tell us he was more like Putin than George Washington, but did we listen…Noooooooooo….

    Ho Hum

  40. 40.

    Tax Analyst

    January 22, 2008 at 9:00 pm

    Shorter Ellison, Ellensburg, Ellers, and Lambchop PigFlop: Who needs that pesky Bill of Rights? It only protects Tarra-rists anyway. What an arse-hole.

  41. 41.

    Svensker

    January 22, 2008 at 9:12 pm

    The other question is: What have we learned from the Padilla trial? Answer: Better to kill them than to try them. And think: If dead, he would’ve been spared the harsh treatment that left him a (sob!) broken Al Qaeda operative mess.

    Don’t ya just love the sound of a true patriot in the morning? So dedicated to the Constitution, so revved up to stand for the Bill of Rights. “We hold these truths to be self-evident…” sends a thrill down this patriot’s spine, that can only be matched by the stirring words: “Trial? We don’t need no friggin trial. Just kill them all.” I think Tom and Ben would have been proud to know ya. I certainly can barely stand the honor.

  42. 42.

    Ellison, Ellensburg, Ellers, and Lambchop

    January 22, 2008 at 11:17 pm

    willing to throw away the Fourth and Fifth Amendments on the word of proven liars?

    See, there’s your head-up-the-ass problem in full display. If you doubt that Padilla was an AQ-trained terrorist, then there is nothing those of us in the real world can do to help you. You may continue to live in your fantasy world where poor recently-converted Muslim ex-cons magically end up in Taliban Afghanistan, “teaching English.”

  43. 43.

    Ellison, Ellensburg, Ellers, and Lambchop

    January 22, 2008 at 11:27 pm

    Don’t ya just love the sound of a true patriot in the morning? So dedicated to the Constitution, so revved up to stand for the Bill of Rights. “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”

    We’ve always killed enemy soldiers (even when they were our countrymen, brothers, and cousins) with no Constitutional trauma, and we always will.

  44. 44.

    bob

    January 22, 2008 at 11:35 pm

    In the end, Padilla was found guilty of thinking and talking about a crime, not committing one. We’ll never know the truth. But we do know that the Bush administration violated every law regarding the treatment of the accused. This was an American citizen with rights, whether you like it or not. This gives a lie to the excuse that we don’t give “illegals” rights, we don’t give them to our citizens either. Fuck ANYONE who thinks this was right in ANY way.

  45. 45.

    RSA

    January 22, 2008 at 11:49 pm

    If you doubt that Padilla was an AQ-trained terrorist, then there is nothing those of us in the real world can do to help you.

    I think the idea is that having the punishment precede the trial and conviction is unjust. There’s also the question of how the government can have been so incompetent as to be able to state with certainty that Padilla was an al Qaeda-trained terrorist and yet not be able to present the evidence in court. I’m sure there’s a good explanation somewhere. . .

  46. 46.

    Jess

    January 23, 2008 at 12:27 am

    The real story is not Jose Padilla, who for all we know may actually have been dangerous, but who is now, courtesy of the Bush administration, a broken and mentally deficient mess. The real story will be of the little men who, in moments of great patriotic fervor, decided it was up to them to destroy our nation’s principles in order to save us all.

    History will not look kindly on those pikers.

    Nice, John! I think I might frame this one…

  47. 47.

    jack fate

    January 23, 2008 at 1:04 am

    Welcome to the new Security Police State. Ruled by cowards and full-blown pussies afraid of their own shadows.

  48. 48.

    Equal Opportunity Cynic

    January 23, 2008 at 1:39 am

    Conservatives my ass. Bed-wetting goose-stepping authoritarians, more like.

    In common parlance, those seem to be equivalent. Maybe grumpy realist will join Andrew Sullivan and me in reclaiming the term, but we’re struggling uphill against mounds of evidence that conservative is now shorthand for fascist.

  49. 49.

    AnotherBruce

    January 23, 2008 at 2:45 am

    History will not look kindly on those pikers

    Fuck what history will think, they should be imprisoned now for shitting on the constitution instead of fulfilling their oath to defend it.

    We’ve always killed enemy soldiers

    Killing an enemy soldier in battle is one thing, killing and torturing a defenseless man is another. It’s amazing how Stalinist that conservatives have become, he would have heartily approved of your methods. I’m so glad that your hero Reagan won the cold war so that we can use Soviet methods of interrogation.

  50. 50.

    Beej

    January 23, 2008 at 3:47 am

    Something’s been troubling me. Maybe someone here can shed some light. I’m well aware of where the Repug candidates stand on Gitmo, torture, the rollback of the Bill of Rights, etc. What I haven’t heard is the Democratic candidates’ responses to a direct question about what they will do to undo the damage the Bush administration has done to the Constitution and the Geneva conventions. Have these questions been asked in any on the Democratic debates?

    I’m a cynical so-and-so. I find it hard to believe that someone who craves power the way a presidential candidate has to crave power is going to rush right in and cede power from the executive branch.

  51. 51.

    4tehlulz

    January 23, 2008 at 7:48 am

    We’ve always killed enemy soldiers

    lol “we”

  52. 52.

    Cyrus

    January 23, 2008 at 8:48 am

    See, there’s your head-up-the-ass problem in full display. If you doubt that Padilla was an AQ-trained terrorist, then there is nothing those of us in the real world can do to help you.

    I don’t see someone disputing that. Can you quote them? Or link to them?

    On a related note, you do understand what the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution say, and why they were written, don’t you?

  53. 53.

    jack fate

    January 23, 2008 at 9:33 am

    See, there’s your head-up-the-ass problem in full display. If you doubt that Padilla was an AQ-trained terrorist, then there is nothing those of us in the real world can do to help you.

    Is that the same real world™ where Saddam Hussein (and now Iran) was the biggest threat to American security since the British in 1812? The same real world were “we don’t torture” means we send people who haven’t been convicted of anything to other rogue nations to have them boiled alive? (Sometimes the waterboarding doesn’t quite cut it, eh?)

    Grow up, coward.

  54. 54.

    Timb

    January 23, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    Whenever the Protein Wisdom guy comes around, hilarity and a fine understanding of Constitutional law follow!

    How one can say he is in favor of conservative government and defend this is beyond me. It would as ridiculous as if a “conservative” defended McCarthy-ism or espoused locking Japanese in concentration camps as a tool in the “war on terror”!

    Wait! You’re kidding! That actually happened?

  55. 55.

    TenguPhule

    January 23, 2008 at 11:30 pm

    We’ve always killed enemy soldiers (even when they were our countrymen, brothers, and cousins) with no Constitutional trauma, and we always will.

    We?

    Your Gutless brethren have been on the other side every time, Tory.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Wonkette says:
    January 22, 2008 at 7:37 pm

    But the Real News is Heath Ledger

    Barry Obama’s blackness will end all war. [The Page]But Newsweek says the war is over. [Think Progress]Is Barry’s massive lead as meaningless as last time? [Political Wire]The Fed is going to dump cheap money on us until we drown in…

  2. Grumpasaurus.com » Travesty of Justice says:
    January 22, 2008 at 11:32 pm

    […] Note: unlike John Cole, I don’t think this sentence is a rebuke to the Bush government. To reach that stage, you first have to accept the Bush-DoJ interpretation of enemy combatant and that this was a fair trial. A real rebuke would have dismissed the case. This is just mealy halfassed reasonableness by the judge. 1. Remember, the Bush DoJ held Padilla for more than 2 years in a Navy brig in order to keep him from the reach of US courts. […]

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 4:04am)
  • Bruce K in ATH-GR on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 3:58am)
  • HumboldtBlue on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 3:58am)
  • Martin on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 3:46am)
  • Rusty on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 3:44am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!