• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

The words do not have to be perfect.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Not all heroes wear capes.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

Republicans in disarray!

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Everybody saw this coming.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

This really is a full service blog.

Let’s finish the job.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

In my day, never was longer.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2008 / What Is Next For the Clinton Campaign

What Is Next For the Clinton Campaign

by John Cole|  February 20, 200811:13 am| 30 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008

FacebookTweetEmail

The gutter:

ABC News has learned that a group of Democratic politicos have set up a new independent 527 organization called the American Leadership Project (ALP) with the express purpose of helping Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, beat Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, in Ohio, and possibly Texas and Pennsylvania as well.

Free from campaign finance rules, ALP will not be legally permitted to coordinate with the Clinton campaign, but it is clearly intended to help her.

***

“Our purpose is to encourage audiences to look beyond the campaign speeches and political rhetoric to specific proposals to address these core issues,” says an ALP mission statement obtained by ABC News.

The plan right now is for the TV ads to never actually mention Obama — rather, the statements about rhetoric vs. reality will go after him through implication, the contrast between Clinton and Obama already being so well-known.

Of course, the Clinton campaign is pulling their best Sgt. Schultz and knows nothing, nothing at all about this. Earlier, a valid question was raised in the comments:

Looking over the race, how much of Obama’s criticism of Clinton have been o f the nature that would harm her and the party’s chances in the general election? I seriously cannot think of any. While everything—EVERYTHING—coming out from the Clinton camp is stuff that can be picked up and used by the Republicans in one way or another or is designed to damage him as a candidate going forward as much if not more than it impacts him now…

He seems to have stuck more or less to contrasting the two of them before Democrats while she goes on stage last night and claims he’s not ready to be PResident.

They will destroy the Democratic party rather than give up this nomination. And don’t tell me I am a Clinton hater for pointing out what is now obvious to everyone. The only thing the Clinton campaign can do at this point is go negative, and they are going to go full-bore negative.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Blowout
Next Post: Hacktacular »

Reader Interactions

30Comments

  1. 1.

    Nicholas Weaver

    February 20, 2008 at 11:20 am

    And going negative is probably going to get some severe blowback, simply because the “negatives” (“Obama is all rhetoric and wishful thinking”), although true, are already acknowledged by everybody.

    So what good can it really do the Clinton campaign to go into frothing-crazy-mode, apart from drive (up to a few days ago) fence sitters like me away in disgust?

    They’d have better luck focusing on the scandal that Obama fathered a BLACK BABY for all the good it would do them.

  2. 2.

    The Other Steve

    February 20, 2008 at 11:21 am

    Last night on CNN, the “analysts” were talking about this. She seems to have a choice of going more negative, or of taking the high road. One of the ladies suggested she’d be far better off taking the high road, as her going negative seems to only have hurt her.

    It does not appear that Hillary is able to learn from mistakes.

  3. 3.

    Chinn Romney

    February 20, 2008 at 11:23 am

    I think Hillary should borrow Bill’s Saxamaphone and go on Letterman. This worked wonders for the Master when he bottomed out after boring the crap out of everyone at the ’88 Dem Convention.

  4. 4.

    ScottS

    February 20, 2008 at 11:27 am

    Negative won’t work for Clinton. It won’t work for the GOP. It is a throw the bums out election. Clinton knew that and that’s why she and her followers are pissed because showing competence and not being a Republican should be sufficient this year and now Obama is in the driver’s seat. McCain makes that a bit more complicated but still.

    Hillary shouldn’t take the risk that her desperation will hurt the party. At the same time, I think there is a meaningful chance that this will only further innoculate Obama from hysterical attack politics in the fall. Big noise will get associated with being a poor loser. Obama can test out how to best respond. And the press can start up their “new teflon” motif.

    She’s still an evil *&$^head for acting like Obama is an unworthy usurper when really he outsmarted her, ran a better campaign, and has plenty of thoughtful policy proposals. Watching her go down might actually be fun.

  5. 5.

    Billy K

    February 20, 2008 at 11:27 am

    So she really wants to reinforce the “Shrillery” meme?

    Wow.

  6. 6.

    L Boom

    February 20, 2008 at 11:27 am

    They’d have better luck focusing on the scandal that Obama fathered a BLACK BABY for all the good it would do them.

    Someone at DKos did a great satire post about that a while ago. “Barack Obama fathered not one, but TWO black babies!”, was actually pretty clever how they handled it. Maybe the Clinton campaign could just borrow it? After all, they’re not bound by the same standards because they’re, uh, running on facts and not on empty rhetoric. Yep. Really.

    As far as the negative ads go, I think Hillary is especially vulnerable to blowback, much more so than almost any other politician in today’s landscape. She’s got tremendously high negatives already and they only confirm the worst suspicions of someone who’s on the fence about her, whereas with a less well-known politician they don’t have all that baggage to confirm.

    At this point, I’m really starting to wonder if Clinton really is trying to torpedo Obama’s chances so she can run against McCain in 2012. It seems less and less paranoid every day of this campaign.

  7. 7.

    Ugh

    February 20, 2008 at 11:34 am

    John – see also.

  8. 8.

    Zifnab

    February 20, 2008 at 11:35 am

    They will destroy the Democratic party rather than give up this nomination.

    Anything that doesn’t kill us, makes us stronger.

    I say, bring it on. Lets draw a line in the sand and see where the real Democrats stand. If Clinton wants to chip away at the party, she’ll be starting with the ground under her own two feet.

  9. 9.

    gypsy howell

    February 20, 2008 at 11:35 am

    The Clinton supporter sites like No Quarter and Taylor Marsh have already turned into rightwing attack machines. They’re linking drudge & Capn Ed, approvingly quoting Sean Hannity, and spewing out any kind of negative crap they can dig up on Obama – it’s like they’ve completely lost their minds.

    Do they realize that come November, they’re going to have to decide if they’re still even democrats?

    Of course, some of them like Larry are democrats-come-lately so maybe the whole party affiliation thing was just a brief fling to get over their break-up with George Bush.

  10. 10.

    Philip the Equal Opportunity Cynic

    February 20, 2008 at 11:39 am

    Hopefully the wiser heads in the Democratic Party will prevail, and they’ll soon be counseling Hillary out of the race for the good of the party, and just threatening to marginalize her if she doesn’t go willingly. But this is the Democrats we’re talking about, so I would never misunderestimate their ability to lose an unlosable election.

  11. 11.

    jnfr

    February 20, 2008 at 11:46 am

    I’m not worried.

  12. 12.

    ThymeZone

    February 20, 2008 at 11:51 am

    I guess Wisconsin taught them nothing. A 17 point asskicking, even with plagiarism and America-hating and Rezko.

    They are completely tone deaf. Every attack on Obama now wins him votes and her fewer votes. They are fighting a tidal wave of popular enthusiasm that is still growing.

    The only question now is how far they will go with this futile campaign. How deep into the pit of negative politics and Machiavellian strategies they will dig themselves.

    This is less of a contest now, and more of a Shakesperian tragedy unfolding for the Clintons. Or maybe a David Lynch movie, not sure.

  13. 13.

    BFR

    February 20, 2008 at 11:53 am

    ABC News has learned that a group of Democratic politicos have set up a new independent 527 organization called the American Leadership Project (ALP) with the express purpose of helping Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, beat Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, in Ohio, and possibly Texas and Pennsylvania as well.

    Free from campaign finance rules, ALP will not be legally permitted to coordinate with the Clinton campaign, but it is clearly intended to help her.

    Okay, but how many Democratic donors are going to hand over large amounts of their hard-earned cash to help what appears to be a dying campaign?

  14. 14.

    Jake

    February 20, 2008 at 11:56 am

    They will destroy the Democratic party rather than give up this nomination.

    Ah, hyperbole. So let me see how this works. It took:
    1. Decades of Republican bullshit gutter scraping antics; 2. A resignation to avoid impeachment;
    3. Arms dealing hijinks;
    4. A woman in a persistent vegitative state
    5. A bullshit invasion that’s wrecked the Army.
    6. Shitting all over the Constitution.
    7. All incompetence all the time.
    8. Snoozing through a record-breaking natural disaster,

    to cripple, not destroy alas, but cripple the Republican party. But one election cycle with one candidate (or a 527 group for that candidate) being nasty is going to ZOMG! DESTROY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY!

    Yawn.

    Here’s what will happen: The Clinton candidacy will take swipes at Obama. People will clutch their pearls and swoon a bit because from another Democrat the attacks will seem nasty. Then, when Obama wins the nomination and McCane and the Republican Masters of Nast go to work and we’ll remember what negative really looks like.

  15. 15.

    John S.

    February 20, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    Or maybe a David Lynch movie, not sure.

    Hopefully not Blue Velvet, then…

    I can just see Wolfson or Penn doing nitrous oxide and glaring at Hillary, “Don’t look at me…don’t you fucking look at me!”

  16. 16.

    GuyFromOhio

    February 20, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    Here’s what will happen: The Clinton candidacy will take swipes at Obama. People will clutch their pearls and swoon a bit because from another Democrat the attacks will seem nasty. Then, when Obama wins the nomination and McCane and the Republican Masters of Nast go to work and we’ll remember what negative really looks like.

    Lads and lassies, we’ve a winner. You want “Party Destruction”? Look to the right – a candidate the gasbags openly derided yet will soon be fellating, and nowhere to go but down. The splinters will be stabbing eachother, trying to figure out if a 3rd-party saviour can be concocted in time.

    Meanwhile, plenty of Democrats are happy to vote Democratic, even if the trad media ijits want to see a fistfight before the real gun battle starts. And it *will* be a gun battle – the neofascists ain’t going quietly.

    Love the Blue Velvet ref, may be time to rent that again …

  17. 17.

    PeterJ

    February 20, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    Okay, but how many Democratic donors are going to hand over large amounts of their hard-earned cash to help what appears to be a dying campaign?

    There’s always republican donors.

  18. 18.

    Jon H

    February 20, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    Hillary’s like the opposite of teflon. She’s a swiffer candidate.

  19. 19.

    Caidence (fmr. Chris)

    February 20, 2008 at 1:03 pm

    Here’s what will happen: The Clinton candidacy will take swipes at Obama. People will clutch their pearls and swoon a bit because from another Democrat the attacks will seem nasty. Then, when Obama wins the nomination and McCane and the Republican Masters of Nast go to work and we’ll remember what negative really looks like.

    I’m going to have to agree with Jake on this one. It is some serious hyperbole to talk about destroying the Democratic Party. The Republican Party is dying of worms, flesh eating bacteria, brain cancer, and palsy. Clinton will have to try hard to top that.

    However, I do remain concerned that Hillary is damaging an already pathologically weak party.

  20. 20.

    Jake

    February 20, 2008 at 1:23 pm

    The Republican Party is dying of worms, flesh eating bacteria, brain cancer, and palsy.

    I will not make a joke about John McCain.

    I will not make a joke about John McCain.

    I will not make a joke about John McCain.

    I will not make a joke about John McCain.

    I will not make a joke about John McCain.

  21. 21.

    KC45s

    February 20, 2008 at 1:28 pm

    I’d second (or third) some of the above. Let Clinton do what Clinton does. It doesn’t matter. Nothing her allies can come up with will be half as vile (or half as effective) as the conservative attack factory. Really, the next six months is simply a giant open audition, an American Idol, to see who gets to replace Ann Coulter for the length of the Obama Administration. Many positions are open in the right-wing Wurlitzer, thousands want the jobs, and the race to the bottom to claim these rare and lucrative prizes will be savage. Compared to that, HRC is just a warm-up. Nice of her to give Obama a sparring partner to prepare, though.

  22. 22.

    A Different JC

    February 20, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    What “destroying the party” could mean: By attacking Obama in a way that harms his candidacy for the general election, the Democrats will lose in ’08. What looked like a realignment in ’06 will collapse. The hundreds of thousands of disaffected voters – independents and ex-republicans – who were looking for a new party to join will see that the Democrats aren’t for them either.

    So, first of all, it is a (possible) destruction that comes from loss of potential.

    But there’s another ‘destruction’ to consider. Was the Democratic party destroyed after 1968? Yes. The party of Truman-JFK-LBJ, of muscular foreign policy + liberal social programs became the party of latte-sipping liberals.

    From 1932-1968 Democrats were in power for 28 years. From 1968-2008 Republicans were in power for 28 years.

    This is the year the Democrats can wipe clean the stink of ’68 and become the nation’s majority party again. If we mess this up, it could be another 28 year wilderness…

    And that’s what I think can credibly be called “destroying the party”

  23. 23.

    Jake

    February 20, 2008 at 2:02 pm

    From 1932-1968 Democrats were in power for 28 years. From 1968-2008 Republicans were in power for 28 years.

    And if you multiply 3 by 2 and subtract 2 from 8 you get two sixes. 1968 contains a six, 666, the number of the beast! And the Democratic party of 1932 is identical to the Democratic party of 2002. OMG, I need another latte!

  24. 24.

    LarryB

    February 20, 2008 at 2:11 pm

    I agree with others that no matter how “nasty” the Clinton campaign gets, it will pale to nothing in comparison to the general. If Obama can’t hack a few love pats from team Clinton, he doesn’t deserve the nomination, period. IMO, the party will be stronger for it, not weaker. The meme that “we’re doing the Republican’s work for them” is bulls**t. They’ll do it anyway.

  25. 25.

    A Different JC

    February 20, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    Jake Says: And if you multiply 3 by 2 and subtract 2 from 8 you get two sixes. 1968 contains a six, 666, the number of the beast! And the Democratic party of 1932 is identical to the Democratic party of 2002. OMG, I need another latte!

    Jake, I don’t know who you are. You may be a college professor, state Senator, or even my brother-in-law. But mocking my analysis, just makes you sound silly. What about the 28 year comparison thing is confusing you?

    I’ll elucidate one point, because it seems I was unclear: I should explain to you that in 1932 the Republicans had just succeeded in ending 12 years of rule by destroying the country with horrific indifference. W happens to be worse than Hoover, but that should work for our purposes of explaining that America of 1932 and 2008 look a lot alike.

  26. 26.

    Jake

    February 20, 2008 at 3:20 pm

    But mocking my analysis, just makes you sound silly.

    [sigh] That’s the point ‘Nother Jesus Christ. By making a mildly silly response to your silly post I avoid the supreme silliness of making a serious response.

  27. 27.

    demimondian

    February 20, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    Ah, nother JC…welcome to BJuice. If you want to be mocked for idiocy, you’ve come to the right place.

    Jake, your math is wrong.

  28. 28.

    J sub D

    February 20, 2008 at 5:05 pm

    I, for one, am grateful that the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act has halted the pernicious effects of big money on our political campaigns. It sure is great that fat cats can’t pour like $100,000 into a campaign now. The $2,300 limit is working!

  29. 29.

    Jake

    February 20, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    Jake, your math is wrong.

    I’m not going to take that from someone named Demonmondian. My math is fine (for once), my phrasing of mathematical equations suxors.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Carrawayblogging § Unqualified Offerings says:
    February 22, 2008 at 8:51 am

    […] passage made famous or infamous right here on Unqualified Offerings. Posted by Jim Henley @ 8:51 am, Filed under: Main « « Musicblogging: Competitive Edition | Main| […]

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Prescott Cactus on War for Ukraine Day 398: Ukrainian Air Defense! (Mar 29, 2023 @ 12:04am)
  • patrick II on War for Ukraine Day 398: Ukrainian Air Defense! (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:58pm)
  • Ohio Mom on Russian Affairs Open Thread: The Child Snatchers (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:49pm)
  • Ohio Mom on Russian Affairs Open Thread: The Child Snatchers (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:45pm)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 398: Ukrainian Air Defense! (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:39pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!