• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

I was confident that someone would point it out and thought why not me.

If you are in line to indict donald trump, stay in line.

Chutkan laughs. Lauro sits back down.

“That’s what the insurrection act is for!”

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

A consequence of cucumbers

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

Republicans would impeach Biden if he bit into a whole Kit Kat rather than breaking the sections apart.

We still have time to mess this up!

No Justins, No Peace

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Come on, man.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

This must be what justice looks like, not vengeful, just peaceful exuberance.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Republicans don’t trust women.

It’s easier to kill a dangerous animal than a man who just happens to have different thoughts/values than one’s own.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / Lack Of Oversight Leads To Incompetence And Abuse

Lack Of Oversight Leads To Incompetence And Abuse

by Tim F|  February 26, 20082:19 pm| 35 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Same old story, one small difference. Instead of screwing the country Republicans shat their own bed for once. Apparently the geniuses didn’t exempt their internal bookkeeping from the right’s ideological hatred of good management practices. If the GOP was a roofing contractor nobody in their right mind would go near them.

Point and laugh. As small and pathetic as Republicans seem today, wait until we get kiddie locks back on the levers of power.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « So What if Obama Wears Muslim Garb
Next Post: Right Back At Ya. »

Reader Interactions

35Comments

  1. 1.

    Z

    February 26, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    It never ceases to amaze me how people like this never think they will get caught.

  2. 2.

    Zifnab

    February 26, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    Apparently the geniuses didn’t exempt their internal bookkeeping from the right’s ideological hatred of good management practices.

    You may not like what they espouse, but at least you know where they stand.

  3. 3.

    Ninerdave

    February 26, 2008 at 2:38 pm

    Democrats are worse

  4. 4.

    myiq2xu

    February 26, 2008 at 2:43 pm

    Some people might wonder why this story came out now, just before an election. My theory is that even though this embarrassing they bit the bullet and let this go forward now while G-Dub is still in charge.

    That way they can have a few designated fall-guys cut good deals with the DOJ and sweep some of it under the rug.

    Pleas bargains and wrist-slap sentences, with sinecures for the fall-guys.

    And if they get a judge like Robert “Maximum Bob” Sirica, G-Dub can issue pardons and/or commutations on January 19th.

  5. 5.

    myiq2xu

    February 26, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    You may not like what they espouse, but at least you know where they stand.

    In restroom stalls?

  6. 6.

    Billy K

    February 26, 2008 at 2:57 pm

    Don’t worry – St. McCain will fix all this stuff. I hear he’s good with accounting.

  7. 7.

    Krista

    February 26, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    You may not like what they espouse, but at least you know where they stand.

    In restroom stalls?

    POTD

  8. 8.

    Jen

    February 26, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    What I want to know is, does this mean they have even less money than we thought they had?

  9. 9.

    Dork

    February 26, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    I’m convinced that a sizeable sum of the missing Iraq money was funneled into the NRCC. If not directly, then the money was “lost” to indys involved with the contractors, then “donated” back to the committee. Any coincidence that the real financial malfeasance started at….oh…about the time the Iraq war started?

    Either way, this is certainly bad news for Democrats.

  10. 10.

    Z

    February 26, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    Maybe they used Karl Rove’s math to do the books.

  11. 11.

    Z

    February 26, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    You are so right, Dork. They will get the ‘Math is hard! I hate it!’ sympathy vote.

  12. 12.

    L Boom

    February 26, 2008 at 3:19 pm

    Democrats are worse

    If this was snark … brilliant!

    If this was not snark … even more brillianter!

  13. 13.

    Darkness

    February 26, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    Renzi steered more than $400,000 of stolen money into his first run for a House seat. Thus, according to Justice, Renzi — who raised just over $1.65 million during that cycle — illegally redirected about a quarter of the money he used to win his race from the customers of one of his companies.

    I’m all for Red State style tough Law and Order as long as it starts with politicians’ asses getting handed to them. How about a “forfeit the election rule” if your books are off by more than 1%? That way Lieberman’s slush fund troubles from the last election would mean we could kick him out now. If the election stands despite fraud, these guys have no reason NOT to cheat. Playing by the rules guarantees you get screwed.

    Can we get some of that endlessly espoused Law and Order from the right wing now. Please?

  14. 14.

    Billy K

    February 26, 2008 at 3:41 pm

    Can we get some of that endlessly espoused Law and Order from the right wing now. Please?

    Hmmm… how brown are the folks you had in mind for justice?

  15. 15.

    Jeffro

    February 26, 2008 at 3:41 pm

    I think Dork’s onto something, and Dems should both take note and then take it public. With all that unaccounted-for money sloshing around, it would be all too easy for a nice percentage to end up back in Republican campaign coffers. Just a cost of doin’ business, right?

    They need to clean up the waste, fraud, kickbacks, and no-bid funny business not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because it’s important strategically to defund the Republican crooks behind it all.

  16. 16.

    Jake

    February 26, 2008 at 4:04 pm

    Republicans shat their own bed for once.

    And for reasons not related to the Rainbow of Fear for once!

  17. 17.

    Jamey

    February 26, 2008 at 4:17 pm

    This is great news for John McCain!!!

  18. 18.

    Dennis - SGMM

    February 26, 2008 at 4:27 pm

    More good news for Republicans: Confidence plunges, inflation rate soars:
    NEW YORK – No good news today on the economic front. Consumer confidence plunged, the wholesale inflation rate soared, the number of homes being foreclosed jumped, home prices fell sharply and a report predicts big increases in health care costs…

    No wonder McCain remarked that he has to convince voters that we’re winning in Iraq. He sure as hell can’t run on anything else.

  19. 19.

    Tom in Texas

    February 26, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    Excellent article on the people surrounding Obama. I suspect he’s a lot less liberal than he is being portrayed, though I’ve noticed he’s unwilling to say so in speeches — this is the Dem primary after all.

  20. 20.

    Face

    February 26, 2008 at 4:37 pm

    Republicans shat their own bed for once

    I believe the nom de jour is “Code Brown”.

  21. 21.

    Cyrus

    February 26, 2008 at 4:37 pm

    How about a “forfeit the election rule” if your books are off by more than 1%?

    Meh, to be fair, one percent is pretty damn low. Setting impossibly high standards doesn’t result in politicians who meet them, just politicians who are better at faking it. And if you want a utilitarian or partisan reason to oppose that rule, I’m pretty sure it’s much harder to keep track of a lot of small donors than relatively few large ones.

    This is just nitpicking, though; a politician’s books being off by 25 percent is ridiculous.

  22. 22.

    Martin

    February 26, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    NEW YORK – No good news today on the economic front. Consumer confidence plunged, the wholesale inflation rate soared, the number of homes being foreclosed jumped, home prices fell sharply and a report predicts big increases in health care costs…

    And the stock market went up. Republicans are happy.

  23. 23.

    Martin

    February 26, 2008 at 4:43 pm

    Oh, and as for the Republican accounting practices, what we call graft and corruption, they call a free market. Accountant oversight is just unnecessary regulation that limits growth.

  24. 24.

    Innocent Bystander

    February 26, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    I’m convinced that a sizeable sum of the missing Iraq money was funneled into the NRCC. If not directly, then the money was “lost” to indys involved with the contractors, then “donated” back to the committee. Any coincidence that the real financial malfeasance started at….oh…about the time the Iraq war started?

    Absolutely right. Remember all of those Republican ‘fundraisers’ where they hauled in millions at each dinner? I think they’ve been doing serious money laundering between the unaccounted Iraqi $8BB (remember, only vetted Republicans need apply for the CPA?) and other questionable income streams (go read madcowprod.com for years now. It takes serious $ to game elections….I’m guessing that they can’t properly match revenue sources or expenses. If I’m the ex-Treasurer of the RNCC, I’m thinking about witness protection programs….

  25. 25.

    Zifnab

    February 26, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    Excellent article on the people surrounding Obama. I suspect he’s a lot less liberal than he is being portrayed, though I’ve noticed he’s unwilling to say so in speeches—this is the Dem primary after all.

    I heard he was the most liberal currently serving US Senate, the most liberal US citizen since Joseph Stalin, and the most liberal life form since the Duck Billed Platypus. So I don’t quite know what you’re judging that against.

  26. 26.

    Zifnab

    February 26, 2008 at 4:57 pm

    Some people might wonder why this story came out now, just before an election. My theory is that even though this embarrassing they bit the bullet and let this go forward now while G-Dub is still in charge.

    That way they can have a few designated fall-guys cut good deals with the DOJ and sweep some of it under the rug.

    Pleas bargains and wrist-slap sentences, with sinecures for the fall-guys.

    And if they get a judge like Robert “Maximum Bob” Sirica, G-Dub can issue pardons and/or commutations on January 19th.

    Or they could all just agree not to press charges against each other. :P

    I’m thinking this all started coming out because someone keeps throwing money in the RSCC piggy bank only to come back finding it empty. I mean, if you’re hemorrhaging money like that in the middle of a glut of cash, who cares? But when the Committee Chairs start digging quarters out of mattresses to make their paydays, a few hundred grand that just “goes missing” will put a few people up in arms.

    These coffers are what pay the party’s bills. Kinda hard to jam phone banks and flood mailboxes with propaganda if you can’t afford the phone bill or the postage, much less pay the office secretary to do all the work.

  27. 27.

    Cyrus

    February 26, 2008 at 5:07 pm

    Tom in Texas Says:
    Excellent article on the people surrounding Obama. I suspect he’s a lot less liberal than he is being portrayed, though I’ve noticed he’s unwilling to say so in speeches—this is the Dem primary after all.

    Interesting article. Your take on it is a little unclear, though. “Less liberal than he is being portrayed (by Republicans)” isn’t saying much; every Democrat is. “… (by the media)” seems inaccurate; I don’t remember too much about him being portrayed as all that liberal. He’s supposed to be the bipartisan guy, after all. “… (by his supporters)” begs the question; how liberal are his supporters portraying him? I doubt that many of his supporters on the left and far left really think he’s left enough for them; just the most left of the viable candidates. The Obamacans like Andrew Sullivan are bending over backwards to portray him (just like everything else that’s good and right in the world) as conservative.

    Well, anyway, I found one particular bit of the article funny. Not that I needed any more reason to treat Republicans with contempt, but sure enough, there was one in there.

    You can see Gration’s influence on any number of issues, perhaps none more significant than nuclear doctrine. Gration is a vocal proponent of eliminating nuclear weapons globally.
    …
    Much of the Democratic establishment has pooh-poohed the idea, though it’s caught on in less stodgy corners of Capitol Hill, like Joe Biden’s Foreign Relations Committee. Obama endorsed it partly at Gration’s urging last October, saying he would seek a world without nukes but would never disarm unilaterally. (The RNC promptly sneered that he was playing to the “fringe elements of his party,” one possible explanation for why Hillary Clinton didn’t follow suit.)

    Do Republicans think that seeking a world without nukes without unilateral disarmament is really a fringe idea, or did they just dishonestly leave that part out of what Obama said he would do? Warmongerers or liars? (SASQ: Both!)

  28. 28.

    Jake

    February 26, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    I heard he was the most liberal currently serving US Senate, the most liberal US citizen since Joseph Stalin, and the most liberal life form since the Duck Billed Platypus.

    You know who else I’ve heard is liberal? Hitler.

  29. 29.

    Martin

    February 26, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    I suspect he’s a lot less liberal than he is being portrayed, though I’ve noticed he’s unwilling to say so in speeches—this is the Dem primary after all.

    It depends on how you measure ‘liberal’. He’s liberal in terms of what he sees as concerns, so you won’t find him being any different than Clinton or really even Kucinich in terms of where they think problems are. They might disagree somewhat on the relative magnitude of those problems.

    In terms of solutions, he’s decidedly not liberal. In fact, I think he’s not ideological at all – he’s pragmatic. So, his speeches connect with the usual slate of problems that liberals see – choice, environment, Iraq, and so on, but his solutions differ rather a lot and I think will appeal to may conservatives.

    More than anything, he’s very evidence driven and he seems to value voters seeing results in a timely and very local manner. So I don’t see much willingness to bend down to traditional liberal or conservative solutions. That’s going to make it damn hard for the right to attack him on policies because more often than not he isn’t offering solutions that fit the usual ‘big government’ or ‘social welfare’ pigeonholes. Now, that’s going to be a problem for a lot of rank and file Democrats that seem intent on jumping back to 1961 on a bunch of things, but every time I’ve cringed at one of his policy solutions and done some research on it, I’ve found myself at least reassured that he’s not out on an ideological ledge – that there’s some solid backing for the policy.

    It’s possible that this will cut him from both sides – that by not presenting the cookie that either the left or right want him to present will doom him, but if it comes down to a policy discussion I’m pretty confident he’s going to kick some ass. He’s got a shitload of reason on his side, which is more than I can say for most politicians.

    The one thing that stands out, if you can put aside a natural instinct to reject new ideas, is that virtually every policy is focused on opening options for voters, with the implied cost being passed on to corporations (that’s not really spelled out). It is an extremely optimistic set of policies for *individuals*. What is missing is how some of this is going to get paid for. The implication is that corporate and top earners are going to be paying, along with some moving of expenses. But that really isn’t spelled out in detail. It’s not a punishment to corporations or the rich, but rather a ‘everyone will win eventually if we fix this problem now’ kind of approach. It’s subtle in ways – and subtle doesn’t always work with voters.

    There is some grumbling on the left about a lack of liberal economic wonks. Goolsbee is liberal, but not in the way that they want. They want a full-on Keynsian revival. Well, Keynes died half a century ago and things have changed, so they’re gonna have to get with the times, I’m afraid. What will be interesting is that I can see some of Reagan’s economic guys giving Obama a nod. I get the sense that the people that put together the first round of Reagan tax cuts are deeply ashamed at the “If we cut all taxes to 0, the government will be rolling in dough!” message coming out of Republicans these days. They will, above all, reward a rational and cogent policy if they see one, I’m sure of that.

  30. 30.

    Z

    February 26, 2008 at 5:56 pm

    Obama favoring pragmatism over ideology vs Clinton doing the opposite, can be chalked up to generational differences. That is part of his appeal to the younger crowd.

  31. 31.

    The Other Steve

    February 26, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    Excellent article on the people surrounding Obama. I suspect he’s a lot less liberal than he is being portrayed, though I’ve noticed he’s unwilling to say so in speeches—this is the Dem primary after all.

    Obama transcends Liberalism.

  32. 32.

    jbofmo

    February 26, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    “wait until we get kiddie locks back on the levers of power.”

    Those had better be pretty damn strong kiddie locks. I don’t see the r’s playing nice for another election cycle or two. They will have to be knocked around very hard to come off this kick they have of flipping off most of the country.

  33. 33.

    jcricket

    February 26, 2008 at 9:47 pm

    I don’t see the r’s playing nice for another election cycle or two. They will have to be knocked around very hard to come off this kick they have of flipping off most of the country.

    Basically unless we can start out-maneuvering on the following the following three fronts, Republicans will continue their ways (damn the consequences):

    1) Parliamentarians in the Senate. We’re not gonna get 60 seats, and we need to find ways to force the Republicans to take unpopular stands/break their filibuster threats. Otherwise they can just keep us at bay with little cost.

    2) Reframing a bunch of topics. Democrats are solidly with the “will of the people”, but the people often think otherwise. Recent polls show this changing (with people giving Democrats a solid majority in every issue when they’re asked which party is better able to handle that issue). So Dems need to sieze on this. Otherwise Republicans can continue to paint Dems as “soft on terror”, “unpatriotic”, “tax and spend” (which is bad, somehow), etc.

    3) Negative attacks. We need to blunt their negative attacks, not necessarily by going negative, but by pushing the public to a place where the negativity works a lot less because it’s viewed as coming from fringe nutjobs (which it is). That way we can spend less time with kabuki dances and more time in the world where Dems actually do a good job (policy + implementation)

  34. 34.

    J Bean

    February 27, 2008 at 12:54 am

    Ninerdave Says:

    Democrats are worse

    Eh, I think the correct response is still “It’s Bill Clinton’s fault.” This one can also now be used by Obamacans.

  35. 35.

    Steven Hawkins

    February 27, 2008 at 10:01 am

    Hmmm reminds me of the 3rd crusade. Richard the lion hearted would have sorted this matter out by just taking them out all at once, no messing around. Bish Bash Bosh.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Dorothy A. Winsor on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 3:51pm)
  • TBone on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 3:49pm)
  • cain on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 3:48pm)
  • TBone on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 3:48pm)
  • Another Scott on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 3:48pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!