• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans in disarray!

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

Trump should be leading, not lying.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

When we show up, we win.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

I like political parties that aren’t owned by foreign adversaries.

Not loving this new fraud based economy.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Trump’s cabinet: like a magic 8 ball that only gives wrong answers.

There is no compromise when it comes to body autonomy. You either have it or you do not.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Just because you believe it, that does not make it true.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. keep building.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

Fight them, without becoming them!

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Elections / Election 2008 / Is This Really All They Have

Is This Really All They Have

by John Cole|  February 29, 200810:24 am| 82 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008

FacebookTweetEmail

Clinton’s new ad is a joke:

Shouldn’t someone have told her that the “ominous serious voice” is more convincing if you don’t hire the voice actor who has done the trailers for every Adam Sandler and Will Ferrell movie?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Make Her Go Away
Next Post: The Soft Bigotry Of Low Expectations »

Reader Interactions

82Comments

  1. 1.

    sparky

    February 29, 2008 at 10:31 am

    i hope McCain pays for this commercial, otherwise she should have spent the cash on donuts and parking.

    or is this a trailer for the Return of Saw XXXVIIII?

  2. 2.

    estragon

    February 29, 2008 at 10:33 am

    That ad made me really actively not want her to be answering that phone for some reason.

  3. 3.

    gypsy howell

    February 29, 2008 at 10:33 am

    Makes me ashamed to be a democrat.

    Please lose quickly, Hillary, before you subject us to a 24 -style ticking clock and typing-in-process crawl. We don’t need any more republican fear-mongering tactics.

  4. 4.

    gypsy howell

    February 29, 2008 at 10:34 am

    Huh? Totally screwed those tags. Oh well. I must have been overcome with fear.

  5. 5.

    libarbarian

    February 29, 2008 at 10:35 am

    Its 3am and your children are in bed, safe from bad comedy, but somewhere in the White House a phone is ringing.

    Who knows the producers, directors, and celebrities?

    Who has the experience to stop Will Ferrell from making another movie?

  6. 6.

    flitterbic

    February 29, 2008 at 10:35 am

    I’m OK with her answering the phone if it’s one of my employees calling out sick – they’ll never do it again.

    If it’s anybody else, not so much.

  7. 7.

    p.lukasiak

    February 29, 2008 at 10:36 am

    What is objectionable in this ad is not the person doing the voice-over, but the fact that this is a very-thinly disguised negative/attack ad.

  8. 8.

    JL

    February 29, 2008 at 10:40 am

    The idea that the President of the United States works 24/7 just in case the phone rings didn’t seem believable. By the way her makeup was perfect. Since I tend to wear makeup, I haven’t found the brand that still looks good at 3 in the morning.

  9. 9.

    KCinDC

    February 29, 2008 at 10:41 am

    She forgot to put in the wolves.

  10. 10.

    Wilfred

    February 29, 2008 at 10:41 am

    Oh Mister trouble never comes around
    when he hears this mighty sound:
    “Here I come to save the day!”,
    that means that Hillary is on the waaaaay.

    Fear, fear wank, wank, experience, wank, wank, poor, poor pitful me, wank, wank.

  11. 11.

    gypsy howell

    February 29, 2008 at 10:42 am

    What is objectionable in this ad is not the person doing the voice-over, but the fact that this is a very-thinly disguised negative/attack ad.

    No, what’s objectionable is the disgusting fear tactics she employs, as if we haven’t had enough of that bullshit from the republicans for the last 8 years.

  12. 12.

    Decided FenceSitter

    February 29, 2008 at 10:45 am

    Well, it’s attempt at crossover appeal. She figures that if Obama can appeal to Centrists, she appeal to fear-mongering bedwetting contingent.

  13. 13.

    gypsy howell

    February 29, 2008 at 10:47 am

    I think I’ll head on over to Larry and Susan’s Nuthouse to read the accolades that I’m sure are pouring in for this ad.

    See ya later.

  14. 14.

    Rick Taylor

    February 29, 2008 at 10:55 am

    Guess she decided to take Bill Kristol’s advice and resort to the politics of fear.

    Both candidates have successively made me question my support of them, and in both cases it was when they grabbed for right wing memes (in Obama’s case, beginning with social security being in crises).

  15. 15.

    GSD

    February 29, 2008 at 10:57 am

    That commercial would be really creepy if it was Sen. Larry Craig opening the bedroom door in the dark.

    -GSD

    P.S. Anthrax redux. Ricin reportedly found in Vegas hotel.

    cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/29/national/main3891549.shtml

  16. 16.

    The Other Steve

    February 29, 2008 at 10:57 am

    The politics of dancing! whoo ah, the politics of ohh feeling good! the politics of moving, oh yeah.

  17. 17.

    Wilfred

    February 29, 2008 at 10:58 am

    This is why the correct response to her is to say that winning with these tactics means that she can’t count on support in the general. She needs to be told to fuck-off in no uncertain terms, not enabled (like always) because, you know, McCain’t is worse.

  18. 18.

    tBone

    February 29, 2008 at 11:01 am

    I hope you’re all happy with your vote for President Obama when you’re being torn limb-from-limb by a pack of rabid wolves.

  19. 19.

    4tehlulz

    February 29, 2008 at 11:03 am

    I’m glad that ricin graphic has the skull and crossbones on it. Otherwise, I couldn’t figure out that it was dangerous.

  20. 20.

    EdTheRed

    February 29, 2008 at 11:06 am

    By this logic, I should vote for Winston Wolf for president…

  21. 21.

    Rick Taylor

    February 29, 2008 at 11:07 am

    On the other hand, via Open Left,

    Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Thursday he would be more willing than Hillary Rodham Clinton to work with Republicans.

    “Her natural inclination is to draw a picture of Republicans as people who need to be crushed and defeated,” Obama said during a telephone interview from Texas with the Cincinnati Enquirer editorial board. “It’s not entirely her fault. She’s been the target of some unfair attacks in the past.”

    Um, I’m kind of with Hillary on this one, Obama. And I hope you’re aware, you’re going to be the target of some unfair attacks in the future, assuming as seems likely you win the nomination.

  22. 22.

    Jake

    February 29, 2008 at 11:08 am

    “This is not a terror incident at this point,” Lombardo said.

    Because no brown people were seen in the vicinity.

  23. 23.

    Jon H

    February 29, 2008 at 11:09 am

    “P.S. Anthrax redux. Ricin reportedly found in Vegas hotel.”

    Chill. Grissom will totally crack that case with the help of Marg “Married to a total schlub” Helgenbergerbergerberger.

  24. 24.

    The Other Steve

    February 29, 2008 at 11:10 am

    HAHAHAHAHAA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    I thought I was making fun of them when I mentioned the Islamofascist Killer Robots!

    But no, they’re real! Fox News tells us so!

    EX-TER-MI-NATE!
    EX-TER-MI-NATE!
    EX-TER-MI-NATE!
    EX-TER-MI-NATE!
    EX-TER-MI-NATE!
    EX-TER-MI-NATE!
    EX-TER-MI-NATE!

  25. 25.

    Jon H

    February 29, 2008 at 11:11 am

    Someone needs to edit that and splice in a male detective’s voice at the end, saying, “We’ve traced the call, and IT’S COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE!” just as Hillary appears.

  26. 26.

    The Other Steve

    February 29, 2008 at 11:11 am

    Um, I’m kind of with Hillary on this one, Obama. And I hope you’re aware, you’re going to be the target of some unfair attacks in the future, assuming as seems likely you win the nomination.

    I think what he’s saying here, is if you respond in kind you appear like a child.

    And people are tired of children running our government.

  27. 27.

    4tehlulz

    February 29, 2008 at 11:12 am

    I imagine Fruit of the Loom sales will skyrocket, as much underwear will be ruined in the wingtardosphere by this not terror at this point incident.

  28. 28.

    SenderC

    February 29, 2008 at 11:12 am

    Who are these people who are up at 3:00am in their work clothes? Will President Hillary never sleep?

  29. 29.

    Zifnab

    February 29, 2008 at 11:16 am

    Um, I’m kind of with Hillary on this one, Obama. And I hope you’re aware, you’re going to be the target of some unfair attacks in the future, assuming as seems likely you win the nomination.

    Barack is playing up the fact that he isn’t Hillary Clinton. The fact that he isn’t Hillary Clinton combined with the fact that he’s willing to embrace Broder-esque “bipartisanship” on such issues as Health Care, ending the Iraq War, and reforming the tax code makes him much harder to attack.

    It’s really hard to call a man who authors bills with Lugar or Warner or Coburn a “radical, intractable leftist” particularly if the guys doing the smearing are Lugar or Warner or Coburn.

    Personally, I think Barack’s recapturing of the middle ground is fantastic news for Dems. It would be nice to “go to war” with the Republicans and win. But I really don’t want to see Washington DC turn into Iraq – with people drawing up in tight political lines and hammering each other for a generation or more.

    All that said – in regards to the TV ad, I’ve never really caught on to the whole “Clinton Nanny State” wingnut meme until this moment. With moonbats like Clinton running for President, I can almost begin to sympathize with the right-wing crazy. Seriously, we all joked about “Democrats are worse”, but with the way Hillary has run this campaign, I almost think she could make it happen.

  30. 30.

    over it

    February 29, 2008 at 11:21 am

    Compare that to will.i.am’s new Obama video:
    We Are The Ones

  31. 31.

    Tsulagi

    February 29, 2008 at 11:21 am

    She forgot to put in the wolves.

    Yeah, that one was a classic. I busted up laughing the first time I saw it.

    Too bad Huckabee won’t get the Pub nod. Could have looked forward to ads with packs of sinister abortion doctors prowling in the early morning hours.

  32. 32.

    Krista

    February 29, 2008 at 11:22 am

    “Now one of Clinton’s laws of politics is this: If one candidate’s trying to scare you and the other one’s trying to get you to think, if one candidate’s appealing to your fears and the other one’s appealing to your hopes, you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope.”

    –Bill Clinton, 2004

  33. 33.

    John S.

    February 29, 2008 at 11:24 am

    What is objectionable in this ad is not the person doing the voice-over, but the fact that this is a very-thinly disguised negative/attack ad.

    Uh-oh.

    If Hillary loses Paul, she’s finished.

  34. 34.

    John S.

    February 29, 2008 at 11:24 am

    What is objectionable in this ad is not the person doing the voice-over, but the fact that this is a very-thinly disguised negative/attack ad.

    Uh-oh.

    If Hillary loses Paul, she’s finished.

  35. 35.

    jrg

    February 29, 2008 at 11:26 am

    “Who do you want answering that call at 3:00 AM?”

    Um, gee, I don’t know… Maybe someone who’s not going to base their military decisions on a fear of getting called a bad name by the Republicans?

  36. 36.

    KCinDC

    February 29, 2008 at 11:27 am

    Islamofascist Killer Robots!

    Damn, is the Onion publishing stories on the Fox News site now? Seriously, how could a real news site use that photo with the story?

  37. 37.

    Rick Taylor

    February 29, 2008 at 11:28 am

    It’s really hard to call a man who authors bills with Lugar or Warner or Coburn a “radical, intractable leftist” particularly if the guys doing the smearing are Lugar or Warner or Coburn.

    I hope you’re right, but these are the same people who managed to smear a Vietnam veteran as a faker who didn’t deserve his purple heart. Frankly, the idea of Oboma being a wild-eyed hyper-partisan leftist is no more ridiculous than Hillary being one. I put nothing past them.

    Personally, I think Barack’s recapturing of the middle ground is fantastic news for Dems. It would be nice to “go to war” with the Republicans and win. But I really don’t want to see Washington DC turn into Iraq – with people drawing up in tight political lines and hammering each other for a generation or more.

    If it works, I will cheer. The thing is, the failure of Broderesque bipartisanship has nothing to do with Democrats pursuing scorched earth policies, or failing to attempt to work with the opposition. They, including Hillary, have pursued compromise, and it hasn’t worked. As long as they have enough votes for filibuster, the Republican minority have no interest in getting out of Iraq, embracing any form of government health care, or bringing us back to economic sanity, and I just don’t see how Obama is going to change that, because his position that he can reach out to the opposition is based on the premise Democrats haven’t been doing that all along. I believe that’s what people are pointing to when they make fun of the ‘Unity pony.’

  38. 38.

    Jon H

    February 29, 2008 at 11:29 am

    “Damn, is the Onion publishing stories on the Fox News site now? Seriously, how could a real news site use that photo with the story?”

    Come on, that’s a totally serious picture of a terrorist robot. It even has a behead-o-ray gun on the front.

  39. 39.

    Jon H

    February 29, 2008 at 11:32 am

    ” They, including Hillary, have pursued compromise, and it hasn’t worked. ”

    Largely because they keep compromising and giving the GOP everything they want.

    The Obama model appears to be “Give Obama exactly what he wants, and Obama will help with something *else* that the opposition wants”.

  40. 40.

    Cassidy

    February 29, 2008 at 11:32 am

    She forgot to put in the wolves.

    Thank you, come again. Smithers, release the hounds

  41. 41.

    Rick Taylor

    February 29, 2008 at 11:33 am

    Via Andrew Sullivan, this cartoon is just too funny, especially for those of us old enough to have grown up with Warner Brothers cartoons.

  42. 42.

    Jon H

    February 29, 2008 at 11:34 am

    “Could have looked forward to ads with packs of sinister abortion doctors prowling in the early morning hours.”

    Oooh, prowling the woods stalking a very pregnant Mrs. Red Riding Hood.

  43. 43.

    Cassidy

    February 29, 2008 at 11:34 am

    As long as they have enough votes for filibuster, the Republican minority have no interest in getting out of Iraq,

    As CIC, Obama or HRC don’t need Congress’s approval. They can just bring them home.

  44. 44.

    bdr

    February 29, 2008 at 11:38 am

    Kids at 3 in the morning are scared of the boogeyman.

    Just saying.

  45. 45.

    John S.

    February 29, 2008 at 11:45 am

    As CIC, Obama or HRC don’t need Congress’s approval. They can just bring them home.

    Wait a minute…are you trying to tell us that the president has the authority to end a war, though they lack the power to start one?

    Because Bush has got me confused on these points – I think he has it backwards.

  46. 46.

    Quackers

    February 29, 2008 at 11:53 am

    I’m gonna just have to laugh next time I hear her whine about some lowball tactic coming
    “right out of the Republican playbook” when she’s obviously using the damned book herself.

  47. 47.

    Cassidy

    February 29, 2008 at 12:05 pm

    Wait a minute…are you trying to tell us that the president has the authority to end a war, though they lack the power to start one?

    Only Congress has the power to declare war…the CIC has the power to deploy and redeploy troops. Technically, as has been the case since Vietnam, this is not a war. Congress’s only position of power in this thing is funding.

  48. 48.

    Dreggas

    February 29, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    It’s easy enough, which candidate has young children they see every day and knows just what may be at stake when that phone rings?

    Which one, despite having shit flung at him, has remained cool as a cucumber and not taken the bait?

  49. 49.

    Tsulagi

    February 29, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    I thought I was making fun of them when I mentioned the Islamofascist Killer Robots!

    Holy shit! R2D2 has gone jihadi. We’re all fucked now.

  50. 50.

    SGEW

    February 29, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    Hey! Maybe Sen. Clinton’s ad is right! Don’t you remember what Michelle Obama said? That her husband is “cranky” when he wakes up? Do you want Pres. Medvedev to have to deal with a “cranky” person when there’s a 3 a.m. emergency call about the latest Ukrainian/Russian crisis? What if Pres. Obama says something not-very-nice? Look at the ad! Hillary Clinton never, ever sleeps, and if even if she’s not ready to take the call, Bill will be there to cover for her (since, naturally, they sleep in the same bed, being married and all). This ad has convinced me, utterly (much in the same way that the new F.I.S.A. bill must be passed, or else that nice clock will explode: and, hey, didn’t you notice that very few people were eaten by wolves during Reagan’s presidency? And now wolves are on the come-back! It all makes sense!).

    Thin, thin reeds. It might work on certain people, tho’.

    BTW, Krista: very nice quote. Sen. Clinton really is running against Pres. Clinton.

  51. 51.

    Jon H

    February 29, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    Obama needs to get Mr. T on the campaign trail with him.

  52. 52.

    tBone

    February 29, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    Holy shit! R2D2 has gone jihadi. We’re all fucked now.

    All of that toe-tapping from C3PO was bound to drive him over the edge sooner or later.

  53. 53.

    Jon H

    February 29, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    “As CIC, Obama or HRC don’t need Congress’s approval. They can just bring them home.”

    In HRC’s case, it’s a pretty safe bet she’d wait until her second term when doing so would be politically safe on the right.

  54. 54.

    SGEW

    February 29, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    Oh, and the Islamofascist Robots also proves that Obama’s a terrorist!

    Isn’t he all for, you know, technology development, and stuff? Not to mention the fact that he’s a Cyborg From the Future Sent to Destroy Us All!

  55. 55.

    Cyrus

    February 29, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    Damn, is the Onion publishing stories on the Fox News site now? Seriously, how could a real news site use that photo with the story?

    LOL, it was great. It reminds me of a Jon Stewart clip. He showed a Fox News segment on a serial killer or something like that in a Florida town that happens to be well-known as a spring break location — so for a video inset, they showed women in bikinis dancing. I wouldn’t be too surprised to learn that there’s a stealth liberal somewhere among Fox News editors.

    The linked also mentioned a “Crusher” tanklike robot made by DARPA. I searched Fox’s Web site and found it, and as might be expected, it’s hilarious. I might feel impressed if it wasn’t seven tons with a top speed of 25 miles per hour, despite being intended for use for scouting and surveillance.

    “This could be used as a scout, or a quick-response support vehicle,” Welby told Stars and Stripes. “With existing cameras we’ve put on there this vehicle is able to see rabbits at long-range, and enemy troops from 4 kilometers [2 and a half miles] away. Imagine sending this to an intersection and letting it sit there to monitor what’s going on for days or weeks.”

    Because no one will ever notice a seven-ton, six-wheeled vehicle parked down by the supermarket. And even if they do notice it somehow, it is completely impossible to get spraypaint in Iraq, right?

  56. 56.

    Tsulagi

    February 29, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    As CIC, Obama or HRC don’t need Congress’s approval. They can just bring them home.

    Yep.

    I look forward to President Obama issuing sternly uplifting worded lengthy proclamations full of hope and change for a bipartisan new way forward tomorrow. Cue will.i.am. And as long as he emphasizes tomorrow, maybe the other guys won’t be as mad at them and call them as many names while Dems stay the course in their strong leadership. Progress.

  57. 57.

    DougJ

    February 29, 2008 at 12:47 pm

    There’s ad for a home security company that is almost exactly the same as this ad.

  58. 58.

    Harley

    February 29, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    Well, if nothing else, she’s teeing up an SNL skit. Dark bedroom, phone rings, Hillary wakes to answer….and, of course, Bill reaches across her to grab it himself. And poor Hillary can’t get a word in edgewise.

  59. 59.

    Sirkowski

    February 29, 2008 at 12:59 pm

    Why is Hillary calling this little girl at 3am? Can’t it wait until morning? Is this sleepy little girl her Secretary of Defense? How many millions have they spent on this nonesensical commercial?

  60. 60.

    DougJ

    February 29, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    You know what would make this better? If it showed Michelle Malkin peaking into the house to check out the family’s countertops. *That* would scare the kids.

  61. 61.

    The Other Andrew

    February 29, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    From now on, whenever I think of Hillary, I’m going to imagine her saying, “Smithers, release the robotic Richard Simmons!”

  62. 62.

    Jon H

    February 29, 2008 at 1:52 pm

    “Bill reaches across her to grab it himself”

    And says, in a stage whisper, “Baby, I told you not to call me here.”

  63. 63.

    Punchy

    February 29, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    Ok, ladies and gents. They found–sit down for this–RICIN in some loser motel room in Vegas. There’s absolutely no hint of anything nefarious, malicious, or underhanded about it. It’s not even illegal to own it!

    Here’s the wager–how long will it take–minutes, hours, or a day–before the Bush Admin uses it as an example of how we must immunize the telecoms, even though it has absolutely no terrorism aspect whatsoever?

  64. 64.

    4tehlulz

    February 29, 2008 at 1:57 pm

    I think the telecoms should be immunized against ricin.

  65. 65.

    SGEW

    February 29, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    (W)e must immunize the telecoms, even though it has absolutely no terrorism aspect whatsoever?

    No terrorism aspect whatsoever? Nonsense! Aum Shinrikyo has sleeper cells all over this country, with their sharpened umbrellas poised to attack. The telecoms won’t be able to wiretap all those calls from Osaka without the immunity bill. Do you want the ricin gas terrorists to win?

    We must defeat Shintofascism wherever it rears its well-groomed head!

  66. 66.

    zzyzx

    February 29, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Sorry, but I’m busy being terrified of a Dalek invasion!

  67. 67.

    Dug Jay

    February 29, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    Well it looks like the gloves are coming off, at least in Texas, as the Clinton campaign attacks Obama over his decade-long ties to Chicago sleazeball, Tony Rezko.

  68. 68.

    Dork

    February 29, 2008 at 2:11 pm

    Condoleeza Ricin. A toxin to our State Department?

  69. 69.

    tBone

    February 29, 2008 at 2:12 pm

    Well it looks like the gloves are coming off, at least in Texas, as the Clinton campaign attacks Obama over his decade-long ties to Chicago sleazeball, Tony Rezko.

    Shorter Dug Jay: I suck at trolling, but I just can’t help myself.

  70. 70.

    Alan

    February 29, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    Who are these people who are up at 3:00am in their work clothes? Will President Hillary never sleep?

    If you recall, Hillary says she’ll work every day for us. Applying lawyerly parsing, who know what the hell she’ll be doing at night.

  71. 71.

    Svensker

    February 29, 2008 at 2:40 pm

    Dork Says:

    Condoleeza Ricin. A toxin to our State Department?

    Snort.

  72. 72.

    True Blue

    February 29, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    “It’s a fair question”

    Obama has just responded brilliantly. A Kerry Democrat would be trying dance away from this “charge”. Obama is a jujitsu master, and the folks calling the shots at the Clinton Campaign are apparently watered down Republicans.

  73. 73.

    Wilfred

    February 29, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    Can this be happening?

    HOUSTON (Reuters) – Barack Obama holds a slight lead on Hillary Clinton in Texas and has almost pulled even in Ohio before contests that could decide their U.S. Democratic presidential battle, according to a Reuters/C-SPAN/Houston Chronicle poll released on Friday.
    Obama, an Illinois senator, has a 6-point edge on Clinton in Texas, 48 percent to 42 percent. He trails Clinton 44 percent to 42 percent in Ohio — well within the poll’s margin of error of 3.8 percentage points.

    He was down 15 points or more only 10 days ago.

  74. 74.

    Digital Amish

    February 29, 2008 at 3:35 pm

    Damn, right out of the Rove 04 playbook.

    Fear you can xerox

  75. 75.

    borehole

    February 29, 2008 at 3:45 pm

    Somebody get Digital Amish a Whip Inflation Now button.

  76. 76.

    J. Michael Neal

    February 29, 2008 at 4:29 pm

    The problem with this ad isn’t that it’s negative; on that score, I have no problem with it. It’s asking a fundamentally important question. The problem with this ad is that it’s entirely ineffective. It doesn’t really manage to draw any distinction between Clinton and Obama. It’s thirty seconds of wasted campaign time. Worse, it’s framed in such a way that it begs for the Obama response that he gave: compare the judgment of the two candidates.

    On the whole, I think that this as is a net loser for Clinton, strictly within its own framing.

  77. 77.

    rreay

    February 29, 2008 at 5:27 pm

    Very funny.

    Coudal partners has a response video up.

  78. 78.

    Tzal

    February 29, 2008 at 5:36 pm

    Actual response video:

    politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Obama_Ringing.html#comments

    As a commentator with a wit much sharper than mine said: ‘She must be thirsty because he keeps drinking her milkshake.”

  79. 79.

    Brachiator

    February 29, 2008 at 5:38 pm

    Who are these people who are up at 3:00am in their work clothes? Will President Hillary never sleep?

    I enjoyed a couple of quips from the New Republic blog page:

    Little-known fact: Hillary Clinton does not sleep. She doesn’t like to make a big deal of this, but in addition to her daytime duties as senator and candidate, Hillary works six nights a week on a rotating schedule of overnight 911 dispatcher, air-traffic controller, and OnStar operator.

    Remember that Hillary works the night shift, like janitors and meat-packers. So she’ll be up at 3. You have to watch all the ads together. It’s like a 30s serial.

    one thing, doesn’t the US have like a whole bunch of time zones, so that if it were 3 am in LA it would be like 7 am in Washington, DC? and what about the people in Hawaii and Alaska, are they missing out on all the angst ridden horror because they are just sitting down to dinner, and presumably aware of their surroundings.

    For Hillary it is 3 am everywhere, all the time and she is ready.

  80. 80.

    Conservatively Liberal

    February 29, 2008 at 8:02 pm

    What is objectionable in this ad is not the person doing the voice-over, but the fact that this is a very-thinly disguised negative/attack painfully lame ad.

    Fixed.

    Really, when I saw the ad I laughed at it, and I bet that I was not alone in doing so. It seems that the story that is going to come out of this primary is that Hillary thought she had it won before it started, and she has been two steps behind Obama ever since. Obama was smart, and he did not play the game as it has been played in the past. He is winning this in the best way possible, by letting every American know that he wants their vote and that he is willing to go the distance to get it.

    Obama’s ground game has been unbelievable to watch. They have been quick to respond, tempered in their responses, and they seem to be able to attack very cleanly. It is not politics as usual, and Obama seemed to know that politics as usual is not selling. People want something different, we are tired of being at each others throats non-stop. We know that our country is in a mess, and it is going to take everyone pulling together to get out of it.

    We are ready to put the experience of living under the worst president in history behind us, and we may be looking at one of the best presidents in decades if Obama wins. I have never been as interested in the outcome of a presidential election as I am in this one. I don’t think we have ever had so much riding on the outcome of a race in many years, if ever.

    Our finances are a wreck, we are mired in a war that we never should have started, our country is divided, our economy is gutted hollow, housing is a disaster and on and on and on…

    We need change. Fast. We need a real leader, and I see the chance of a better leader in Barack than I do Hillary. Change means just that, things change. With change comes the possibility of error, and that is unavoidable. That means if you want change, you have to take a chance. So I have to look at who I would prefer to take a chance with, and Obama is it. So much so that I am putting my money in his hands, and I don’t part with that green easily.

    He will be good for the party in every state, even the ones we don’t win. He attracts record numbers of people to the polls, and that means he will do the same thing in the general. Downticket Democrats are nuts if they think Hillary is going to help them. People are saying that the right will shred Obama, but I think they have geared up for a Hillary contest and were ready to unload on her in the general. Anyone remember ‘Clinton Fatigue’? If Hillary is in the general, I think that she will be pounded non-stop, 24/7, and by the time the election comes people will be so sick and tired of everything Clinton, they will stay home or go out of their way to vote against her.

    It is going to be interesting for the next few days, to say the least.

  81. 81.

    The Other Steve

    February 29, 2008 at 9:23 pm

    He was down 15 points or more only 10 days ago.

    But Obama has to win both Texas and Ohio by triple digits, or Hillary wins.

  82. 82.

    TenguPhule

    March 1, 2008 at 12:29 am

    Shorter Dug Jay: I suck *donkeyballs*, but I just can’t help myself.

    Corrected for accuracy.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Tuesday Night Open Thread 4
Image by John Cole (11/13/25)

Recent Comments

  • Sister Inspired Revolver of Freedom on War for Ukraine Day 1,358: Another Long Night of Russia Once Again Striking Ukrainian Civilian Targets (Nov 14, 2025 @ 1:13am)
  • BigJimSlade on Thursday Night Open Thread (Nov 14, 2025 @ 12:58am)
  • cain on Thursday Night Open Thread (Nov 14, 2025 @ 12:53am)
  • ruckus on The End of the Beginning (Nov 14, 2025 @ 12:44am)
  • Carlo Graziani on Part 3: There Is No Artificial General Intelligence Down This Road (Nov 14, 2025 @ 12:30am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!