• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Let’s show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

President Biden is doing good where he can, and getting it done.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

“Why isn’t this Snickers bar only a nickel?”

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

This fight is for everything.

Come on, man.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

“And when the Committee says to “report your income,” that could mean anything!

In after Baud. Damn.

DeSantis transforming Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Second rate reporter says what?

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

If West Virginia and San Francisco had a love child.

Narcissists are always shocked to discover other people have agency.

Well, whatever it is, it’s better than being a Republican.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / War / Sadr’s Incredibly Humiliating Defeat

Sadr’s Incredibly Humiliating Defeat

by Tim F|  March 30, 20081:30 pm| 40 Comments

This post is in: War, General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

As always Cernig has the most thorough rundown of developments in Iraq. Go read.

Meanwhile, I have a couple of questions for the people who think that Sadr lost something.

* Which goal did Maliki accomplish? Did the JAM disarm, lose territory, surrender any leaders? Unless you count retreating to Baghdad, watching his most disciplined combat division disgraced or releasing Sadrist prisoners en masse as “goals” it is hard to see where Maliki came out ahead.
* Sadr issued a list of demands and Maliki accepted. Presumably if Maliki’s government wasn’t getting violated over a barrel it would have its own list of demands. What were they? Did Sadr accept?

Prompt reply appreciated.

YHS,

TF

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Post #10,000
Next Post: Hillary’s Endgame »

Reader Interactions

40Comments

  1. 1.

    mellowjohn

    March 30, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    so al-maliki surrenders to al-sadr.

    surely this is the proof we need that the surge is working.

  2. 2.

    demimondian

    March 30, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    Damn it, people, it’s simple. You’ve simple permuted the words — where you’ve been reading “Bush’s statement ‘the surge is working'”, what was actually written was “Bush’s ‘working the surge’ statement”. Why is that so hard to follow?

  3. 3.

    4tehlulz

    March 30, 2008 at 2:08 pm

    In before leftist cheerleading for our (lol, our) enemies.

  4. 4.

    dbrown

    March 30, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    Its all part of bushie’s (via cheney) to get Iraq to setup the dems as fall guy’s – didn’t want a stable Iraq before Novemeber … then the dems could claim victory and pull out. American blood = repubic votes

  5. 5.

    Notorious P.A.T.

    March 30, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    surely this is the proof we need that the surge is working

    How DARE you question the great and powerful General Petraeus?????!?

  6. 6.

    mikesdak

    March 30, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    This was posted on Crooked Timber three days ago….

    On past performance, the likely pattern will be one of initial success, followed by a lot of tough talk, and then a bloody stalemate, ending in a patched-up compromise.

    I think that’s more or less what happened, although it looks like Maliki got the short end.

  7. 7.

    jake

    March 30, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    Oh Tim. No Right thinking American has time to think about Sadr’s defeat is actually a defeat.

    They’re too busy celebrating the fact that once again the dirty rotten defeatocrats must be sobbing into their tofu lattes because more American soldiers didn’t die.

  8. 8.

    GSD

    March 30, 2008 at 2:40 pm

    We know full well that it is the GOP and the Bushists who are most invested in the continued deaths of American soldiers.

    I mean Cheney says “so” and Bush thinks it is “romantic”.

    Most Americans wanted US soldiers out of that morass back in 2006.

    Most Bushists and McCainistas want US troop deaths for 100 more years.

    -GSD

  9. 9.

    Jay McDonough

    March 30, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    from swimming freestyle:

    “So, who did win this week? It’s probably fair to say losers don’t issue demands and winners don’t accept those demands so readily.”

    http://swimmingfreestyle.typepad.com

  10. 10.

    TenguPhule

    March 30, 2008 at 4:12 pm

    A few more victories like this and we’ll need to start boning up on the Koran.

  11. 11.

    jake

    March 30, 2008 at 4:33 pm

    A few more victories like this and we’ll need to start boning up on the Koran.

    [Cue shrieks of outrage from the Brown Squirts]

    That might not be a bad idea.

  12. 12.

    Todd D

    March 30, 2008 at 5:22 pm

    The deeper question is how much control Sadr really has over the Mahdi Army. Sadrists have been carrying out attacks for months against his orders. He’s more of a symbol than a commander, and it’s possible that he has no real authority to enforce such a deal. It sounds like conditions are getting pretty bad inside Basra, so that may have more influence on what happens than any kind of decree from Sadr.

    It’s hard to look at this objectively and see any victory for Maliki. His forces are deeply infiltrated and have “loyalty issues”. There was virtually nobody in Basra taking orders from the government. And the cash-generating oil exports came to a halt, and will be reduced for some time even in the best case. Maliki is already having a hard time paying the “Awakening” (Sahwa) forces, and if he can’t pay his own troops on time there could be more trouble.

  13. 13.

    nabalzbbfr

    March 30, 2008 at 5:23 pm

    More desperate spinning from those rooting for an American defeat. Try explaining this away:

    Sources in Basra tell TIME that there has been a large-scale retreat of the Mahdi Army in the oil-rich Iraqi port city because of low morale and because ammunition is low due to the closure of the Iranian border.

    It seems the Iranians are also seeing the writing on the wall, little good that it will do them.

  14. 14.

    demimondian

    March 30, 2008 at 5:42 pm

    What is it about right wing trolls that they quote anonymously sourced and widely discredited reports and expect us to refute them again?

  15. 15.

    athensboy

    March 30, 2008 at 6:30 pm

    Makiki couldn’t do shit if the US wasn’t taking care of his logistics, sending US Special Forces to babysit the Iraqi commanders and having the US Air Force bomb and strafe Basra. With all that Sadr still controls 70% of Basra. Maliki isn’t taking on Sadr, he’s taking on a movement of poor Shia people. Sadr’s esteem went up 10 fold with Shia’s. The Iraqi Army is a joke…even with US support. Maliki is and will always be a puppet of Bush….how sad.

  16. 16.

    w vincentz

    March 30, 2008 at 6:44 pm

    Nabal,
    You continue to amaze me.

  17. 17.

    joe

    March 30, 2008 at 6:49 pm

    Well, if an anonymous person in the comment thread of a blog quotes an anonymous source quoting anonymous “sources in Basra,” that’s good enough for me.

    You know, it’s one of those victories where you leave you enemy in control of the cities you’ve been fighting over, and agree not to go after him anymore. That kind of victory.

  18. 18.

    nabalzbbfr

    March 30, 2008 at 6:55 pm

    Iran should realize that now they are in VERY deep S**T. They have now activated the Bush Doctrine: the US will treat countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups (to wit Sadr and his Mahdi army) as terrorists themselves. They are now precisely in the same position as the Taliban was on 9/11.

  19. 19.

    Dug Jay

    March 30, 2008 at 7:06 pm

    It’s not surprising to see that the Keyboard Commandos of the Left know almost nothing about what is happening in Iraq. This brief excerpt from the NYTimes web posting of earlier today illustrates some of this:

    For starters, the Shiite rebels are fighting mainly Iraqi soldiers, rather than Americans. Their leader, Moktada al-Sadr, is not defending against attacks from a redoubt inside the country’s most sacred shrine, but is issuing edicts with a tarnished reputation from an undisclosed location, possibly outside the country. And Iraq’s prime minister, a Shiite whom Americans had all but despaired would ever act against militias of his own sect, is taking them on fiercely.

    The differences represent a shift in the war, whose early years were punctuated by uprisings against Americans by a vast, devoted group of Mr. Sadr’s followers, who were largely respected by Shiites. As their tactics veered into protection rackets, oil smuggling and other scams, Mr. Sadr’s followers too began to resemble mafia toughs more than religious warriors, splintering and forming their own gangs and networks, many beyond Mr. Sadr’s direct control.

    Even some Sadrists seemed to understand the toll their methods were taking on their popular appeal, which has become increasingly important as provincial elections draw near.

  20. 20.

    athensboy

    March 30, 2008 at 7:07 pm

    Hey Nabal, we can’t control a country of 30 million, how the hell would a genius like you control Iran which has 80 million people? Are you by some chance related to Shrub?

  21. 21.

    demimondian

    March 30, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    Interesting, isn’t it, that Dug Jay’s piece was written some days ago, before everything fell apart in Basra, and the whole “happy talk express” is based on a report at second hand sourced on an anonymous source to the Istanbul bureau chief of the NYT — who speaks neither Arabic nor Turkish, and who parrots the standard lies, even as the Iraqi Army was being routed in Basra.

    It’s a pity that the truth is real, isn’t it, Dug Jay?

  22. 22.

    joe

    March 30, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    Iran should realize that now they are in VERY deep S**T. They have now activated the Bush Doctrine: the US will treat countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups (to wit Sadr and his Mahdi army) as terrorists themselves. They are now precisely in the same position as the Taliban was on 9/11.

    Muqtada al Sadr and the Mehdi Army are Shiite faction with the worst relationship with Iran, you tool. SCIRI and the Malaki government – those would be the “good guys” in your juvenile understanding of the foreign policy – have much stronger ties with Iran.

    But, other than that, great comment.

  23. 23.

    athensboy

    March 30, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    Hey Dug, according to that logic wouldn’t Maliki be attacking Badr Brigade members in Basra who were also involved in criminal activities? Oh, thats right, those Badr people are aligned with Hakim, a big ally of Maliki. I guess Maliki’s attacking Sadr in Basra has NOTHING to do with provincial elections in October that Sadr’s people were predicted to win? Try your neo-con bullshit on people less informed than me. That horseshit don’t fly, I don’t care what blog you got it from.

  24. 24.

    jake

    March 30, 2008 at 7:16 pm

    Are you by some chance related to Shrub?

    More likely he’s related to Dug Jay. Brother, cousin, uncle, all three at once. The possibilities are endless.

  25. 25.

    nabalzbbfr

    March 30, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Hey Nabal, we can’t control a country of 30 million, how the hell would a genius like you control Iran which has 80 million people? Are you by some chance related to Shrub?

    Unbiased public opinion surveys show that Iran’s population is one of the most pro-American on this planet, let alone the Middle East, who are chafing under an oppressive theocracy. Polls show that President Bush has far higher public approval in Iran than in the US. And you personally might learn a lesson from that — at least show a little respect for the office if not for the man.

  26. 26.

    joe

    March 30, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    Before the invasion of Iraq, the streets of Tehran were full of hundreds of thousands of protesters. The anti-government, reformist protests (which included soccer fans chanting “USA! USA!” after a victory) became so popular that the government had to imprison some of its own security personnel for attacking protest leaders, because they realized the protests were so popular and the backlash against the government was growing so large that they needed to save their own skins.

    Since the invasion of Iraq? Nuthin. Between the “rally ’round the flag” phenomenon and the free hand the government has been given to act, the opposition has been silenced.

    These hawks, they like to throw around phrases like “democracy” and “liberation,” but they really have no effing idea what those concepts mean, or how they work.

  27. 27.

    4tehlulz

    March 30, 2008 at 7:40 pm

    Unbiased public opinion surveys show that Iran’s population is one of the most pro-American on this planet

    Until we bomb them.

  28. 28.

    demimondian

    March 30, 2008 at 7:45 pm

    Unbiased public opinion surveys show that Iran’s population is one of the most pro-American on this planet, let alone the Middle East, who are chafing under an oppressive theocracy.

    A citation might help you here.

    Establish the truth of the statement? Hell, no! Tt will help you establish your comic premise!

  29. 29.

    w vincentz

    March 30, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    Nabal,
    Got a link to the “unbiased public opinion surveys”?
    Thanks in advance.

  30. 30.

    spanielboy

    March 30, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    Iran should realize that now they are in VERY deep S**T. They have now activated the Bush Doctrine: the US will treat countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups (to wit Sadr and his Mahdi army) as terrorists themselves. They are now precisely in the same position as the Taliban was on 9/11.

    Which army is going to show up to do this fighting? Is it the army that you give support to by your words? Or are you willing to put a gun in your hand and help out? My gosh, it is like a game to some people to get goosebumps by sending other folks to to war.

    Back to MAS. For those who think the Iraqi government came away with a win, you are wrong. MAS is still alive. MAS is still in control of his forces. MAS is still in control of land in Iraq. So how does one determine on a scorecard to who gets point for this plan? The Iraqi government probably took a few steps back with this stunt — the Sunnis and Kurds are watching this with much fascination wondering when the government will try something similar to them in the future. By the way, did I mention that the US Army couldn’t stop MAS in 2004 — and he ‘gave up’ then also.

  31. 31.

    jake

    March 30, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    There seems to be a correlation between the number of posts on BJ and the lameness of the trolls. By the time John et al hit 20,000 this is all they’ll be able to manage.

  32. 32.

    ploeg

    March 30, 2008 at 9:24 pm

    They are now precisely in the same position as the Taliban was on 9/11.

    Unfortunately, we are not anywhere close to the same position that we were in in October 2001.

    And granting that the Iranian public is the most pro-American public in the Middle East (I have not heard anything to the contrary), there is a limit to how far that gets us when the bombs start falling. Or when we start propping up the same sort of kleptocrats that we propped up in Iraq as our idea of a post-theocratic Iranian government.

  33. 33.

    Cernig

    March 30, 2008 at 9:29 pm

    Nabal “at least respect the office if not the man”.

    I’ve never understood why some idiots expect an oddly shaped room to work a magical alchemy. If the person was an asshole walking in, then they’ll be an asshole sitting behind the desk. I don’t have to respect assholes even if they have fancy titles. That’s called freedom.

    But believing in magical transformations is what the 20-something-per-centers are all about.

    Regards, C

  34. 34.

    TenguPhule

    March 30, 2008 at 9:46 pm

    Polls show that President Bush has far higher public approval in Iran than in the US. And you personally might learn a lesson from that—at least show a little respect for the office if not for the man.

    Yes, the lesson is Bush needs to thrown from 20,000 feet to Iran. Without a parachute.

  35. 35.

    TenguPhule

    March 30, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    Iran America should realize that now they are in VERY deep S**T. They have now activated the Bush Doctrine: the US Iran will treat countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups (to wit Sadr and his Mahdi armyAnti-government forces) as terrorists themselves. They are now precisely in the same position as the Taliban was on 9/11.

    The kicker is that under the Bush doctrine, assassination of leaders of countries funding terrorists is okay.

    The wheels of justice grind slow but fine.

  36. 36.

    TenguPhule

    March 30, 2008 at 9:51 pm

    The differences represent a shift in the war Pentagon Propaganda

    Fixed.

    Dugjay, reality’s anti-particle.

  37. 37.

    TenguPhule

    March 30, 2008 at 9:52 pm

    The differences represent a shift in the war Pentagon Propaganda

    Fixed.

    Dugjay, reality’s anti-particle.

  38. 38.

    TenguPhule

    March 30, 2008 at 9:56 pm

    Sources in Basra tell TIME that there has been a large-scale retreat of the Malaki Army in the oil-rich Iraqi port city because of low morale and because ammunition is low due to the closure of the Iranian border.

    Corrected.

    The only safe bet in Iraq is that Bush will back the wrong dog EVERY FUCKING TIME.

  39. 39.

    John Spragge

    March 30, 2008 at 11:47 pm

    Nabal:

    Joe’s got it right; a strongly reformist (and pro-Western) reform movement has virtually collapsed since the Iraq invasion, and it takes a die-hard ignorance of the realities of national feeling not to see the connection.

    I believe you have a lot of residual good will in Iran. And a whole lot of history strongly suggests that the moment the first Marine recon platoon (officially) crosses the Iranian border, that goodwill will vanish, never (at least in American political time) to return. Iranians have a long history as a people and as an independent nation. They still have bad memories of Alexandros of Macedon, and he conquered them over four hundred years before Christ.

    Respect goes both ways. If you want respect for your institutions after eight years of bloody blunders, how about a modicum of respect for a great and ancient civilization? Or if you can’t manage that, at least try some respect for the American soldiers on the line, should the (lame duck) Bush administration actually try another and even more dubious gamble by invading Iran.

  40. 40.

    b. hussein canuckistani

    March 31, 2008 at 10:04 am

    Hee hee. I like that. “They have activated the Bush Doctrine”, like some inevitable ass-kicking is now moving to destroy them like a city-sized Battlebot and it’s their own damn fault.

    I’ve noticed that creationists like to argue with old-timey English that makes then sound biblical, but I hadn’t noticed before that the military-fetishists like to talk in that third-person Kremlin technocrat voice. It’s pretty funny when you start noticing.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • WaterGirl on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:25pm)
  • Yutsano on Monday Morning Open Thread: The Tariff We Pay for Civilization (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:24pm)
  • trollhattan on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:23pm)
  • Eduardo on Take the Fucking Win (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:22pm)
  • narya on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:22pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!