• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

American History and Black History can not be separated.

People are complicated. Love is not.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

He really is that stupid.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

An unpunished coup is a training exercise.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

In after Baud. Damn.

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

There are no moderate republicans – only extremists and cowards.

Let me file that under fuck it.

Fani Willis claps back at Trump chihuahua, Jim Jordan.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Spilling the end game before they can coat it in frankl luntz-approved dogwhistles.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

I was promised a recession.

Maybe you would prefer that we take Joelle’s side in ALL CAPS?

Bark louder, little dog.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Humorous / Truth In Fiction

Truth In Fiction

by Tim F|  April 19, 20081:47 pm| 11 Comments

This post is in: Humorous, Science & Technology

FacebookTweetEmail

Most researchers I know (being a reserarcher I know a few) can think of an experience like this.

IOWA CITY, IA—University of Iowa neuroscientists studying spatial learning and the effects of stress on memory announced Tuesday that a little son-of-a-bitch mouse ruined an experiment on cognitive performance by effortlessly navigating a maze that researchers spent nearly a year designing and constructing.

The test subject, a common house mouse, briskly traversed the complicated wooden maze in under 30 seconds or, according to the study’s final report, roughly 1/8,789,258 as long as it took the lab to secure funding for the experiment. According to researchers administrating the standard Y-maze test, the fucking bastard never even broke his stride during the first trial, always selecting the correct route while consistently avoiding blind dead-end alleys.

The worst flaw in most films about science is the way that important experiments always work on the first try. Lord, that would be a happy day in my lab. It cracks me up every time, though I guess it’s a reasonable trade-off against said movies being eighteen hours long.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Friday Open Thread
Next Post: Spirits Blogging »

Reader Interactions

11Comments

  1. 1.

    Sock Puppet of the Great Satan

    April 19, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    Biggest reason I didn’t do a PhD: trying carefully prepared, expensive experiments fail completely.

    It’s God’s way of telling you to dump the science stuff and get an MBA or a real estate license.

    One of the reasons Mythbusters is occasionally great: they show the experiments failing pathetically. They then tweak the conditions, and try again.

  2. 2.

    Soylent Green

    April 19, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    Was this in Daniel Faraday’s lab?

  3. 3.

    Rick Taylor

    April 19, 2008 at 2:30 pm

    From the book, Surely you’re joking Mr. Feynman (the autobiography of a famous Caltech physicist)

    . . .For example, there have been many experiments running rats through all kinds of mazes, and so on–with little clear result. But in 1937 a man named Young did a very interesting one. He had a long corridor with doors all along one side where the rats came in, and doors along the other side where the food was. He wanted to see if he could train the rats to go in at the third door down from wherever he started them off. No. The rats went immediately to the door where the food had been the time before.

    The question was, how did the rats know, because the corridor was so beautifully built and so uniform, that this was the same door as before? Obviously there was something about the door that was different from the other doors. So he painted the doors very carefully, arranging the textures on the faces of the doors exactly the same. Still the rats could tell. Then he thought maybe the rats were smelling the food, so he used chemicals to change the smell after each run. Still the rats could tell. Then he realized the rats might be able to tell by seeing the lights and the arrangement in the laboratory like any commonsense person. So he covered the corridor, and still the rats could tell.

    He finally found that they could tell by the way the floor sounded when they ran over it. And he could only fix that by putting his corridor in sand. So he covered one after another of all possible clues and finally was able to fool the rats so that they had to learn to go in the third door. If he relaxed any of his conditions, the rats could tell.

    Now, from a scientific standpoint, that is an A-number-one experiment. That is the experiment that makes rat-running experiments sensible, because it uncovers that clues that the rat is really using– not what you think it’s using. And that is the experiment that tells exactly what conditions you have to use in order to be careful and control everything in an experiment with rat-running.

    I looked up the subsequent history of this research. The next experiment, and the one after that, never referred to Mr. Young. They never used any of his criteria of putting the corridor on sand, or being very careful. They just went right on running the rats in the same old way, and paid no attention to the great discoveries of Mr. Young, and his papers are not referred to, because he didn’t discover anything about the rats. In fact, he discovered all the things you have to do to discover something about rats. But not paying attention to experiments like that is a characteristic example of cargo cult science.

  4. 4.

    RSA

    April 19, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    Nice article. When I was in grad school studying artificial intelligence, one of my professors, who’d done early work in an area called reinforcement learning, described his lab’s first, long-ago efforts to solve the so-called pole-balancing problem. You have a cart on a track, with a pole attached by its bottom to the cart (all in simulation). The system needs to learn how to push the cart back and forth so that the pole balances upright. The first experiment went well; the system learned how to balance the pole easily. In fact, too easily–no matter how the system’s parameters were changed, it was always able to balance the pole. Eventually they discovered that in their simulation, the gravitational force had the wrong sign. Essentially the cart was being simulated as traveling back and forth across the ceiling, with the pole falling into a vertical position all by itself.

  5. 5.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    April 19, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    little son-of-a-bitch mouse ruined an experiment on cognitive performance by effortlessly navigating a maze that researchers spent nearly a year designing and constructing.

    Elitist bastard.

    I would never trust a mouse like that. Running a maze should be hard work. I bet the other mice don’t trust that smug showoff rodent. He probably doesn’t even wear a Mickey Mouse lapel pin.

  6. 6.

    Delia

    April 19, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    Elitist bastard.

    I would never trust a mouse like that. Running a maze should be hard work. I bet the other mice don’t trust that smug showoff rodent. He probably doesn’t even wear a Mickey Mouse lapel pin.

    Yeah. All the other mice became bitter, turned to religion and guns, and started voting Republican.

  7. 7.

    Person of Choler

    April 19, 2008 at 11:50 pm

    Is there any topic that commenters here won’t turn into snark about Republicans?

    I used to think it was Bush Derangement Syndrome, but the symptoms of a more generalized condition may be presenting here.

    Keep it up, I enjoy watching the pathology.

  8. 8.

    merl

    April 20, 2008 at 12:45 am

    I think they’re making fun of Sen Clinton, not Repukes. Pay attention, will you?
    Repubs suck.

  9. 9.

    Sirkowski

    April 20, 2008 at 10:17 am

    I’m pretty sure that’s a rat in the picture.

  10. 10.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    April 20, 2008 at 11:18 am

    Is there any topic that commenters here won’t turn into snark about Republicans?

    No, none whatsoever.

    At teh Balloon Juice, we are performing an experimental verification of the Third Law of Snarkification, which states that in a closed thread the amount of snark and spoof always increases.

  11. 11.

    grumpy realist

    April 20, 2008 at 1:39 pm

    “Under the most rigorously controlled conditions of temperature, humidity, and environment, the organism will do as it damn well pleases.”

    (One of Murphy’s Laws of Technology.)

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • WaterGirl on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:26pm)
  • WaterGirl on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:25pm)
  • Yutsano on Monday Morning Open Thread: The Tariff We Pay for Civilization (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:24pm)
  • trollhattan on Henry Would Like His Lunch Right Now, Please (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:23pm)
  • Eduardo on Take the Fucking Win (Apr 15, 2024 @ 1:22pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!