• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Innocent people do not delay justice.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

Republicans do not trust women.

The willow is too close to the house.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Prediction: the gop will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. keep building.

T R E 4 5 O N

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Republicans in disarray!

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

GOP baffled that ‘we don’t care if you die’ is not a winning slogan.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Of course you can have champagne before noon. That’s why orange juice was invented.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / McCain: No More Aid to Israel

McCain: No More Aid to Israel

by Michael D.|  April 22, 20088:05 pm| 25 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Well, he didn’t quite come out and say it, but it’s implied:

…McCain is one of the few in Congress not to indulge in pork, we again are cautiously optimistic with his pledge to stop earmarks by promising to veto every pork-laden spending bill “and make their authors famous.”

Either McCain just made a mistake, or he doesn’t know that foreign aid to Israel is attached as an earmark (which would call into credibility his knowledge of one of our most notable funding packages year over year.)

And now, back to your regularly scheduled primary programming…

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Election Open Thread
Next Post: 9,000,000 »

Reader Interactions

25Comments

  1. 1.

    Liberal Masochist

    April 22, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    For real? I fear for Wilfred’s sanity!

  2. 2.

    Dug Jay

    April 22, 2008 at 8:23 pm

    This is a really silly issue of the sort that only a fool dolt like Yglesias would even bring up. Such funding, as well as other parts of foreign aid, have been handled in this manner in recent budget cycles, but could readily and without controversy, be handled in the budgetary process used in past cycles.

  3. 3.

    calipygian

    April 22, 2008 at 8:30 pm

    So Dug Jay, you are for giving billions of dollars to a rogue nuclear state, who refuses to sign the NPT AND works to steal our nuclear secrets.

    If it were Iran, we’d begin bombing in five minutes.

  4. 4.

    Incertus

    April 22, 2008 at 8:31 pm

    McCain said something without understanding the full implications of it? How does that make him any different from any other Republican?

  5. 5.

    Liberal Masochist

    April 22, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    Wilfred – Come out, come out, wherever you are!

    Since we have an Israel thread going here, I will just post this here instead of at the bottom of the earlier thread:

    Ye. Gods. Let me be clear. Obviously, a different President will engage with Israel differently. Look at the difference between how Clinton and Bush attempted to handle the Mideast peace process. McCain may end up being even less engaged than Bush as compared to Clinton, but Israel will remain an ally and I doubt very much that foreign aid, weapons sales and the like will cease under him (ditto Obama and Clinton).

    Here is your argument: You are saying the main reason we have been engaged FOR DECADES in the Middle East is because of our support for Israel and that the primary reason we invaded, tragically lost 4000 soldiers and continue to stay in is because of too much fealty to Israel and their lobby. Your emphasis on Israel is totally out of whack with reality.

    The main reason for our decades long engagement has been oil. There are side reasons (checking the Soviets, the post-Shah Iranians and supporting Israel are reasons too, but less important). The British and French played the Great Game too. They did not do it for Israel. They did it to get oil concessions. The coups, the propping up of corrupt regimes etc. were mainly about oil. Supporting Israel has been a way to further these economic objectives.

    We are arguing about degrees here. I would submit that most rational people would agree with my reading of history, not yours. Given how quick you let the expletives fly in the “Hillary nukes Iran” thread and the vehemence with which you make your weak sauce case, it sounds to me like you have some serious issues with the state of Israel (disclaimer: I am NOT implying everything the Israelis do is above board – it clearly is not, so don’t go there).

    Think of it this way: leave the oil in the mideast and make Central Africa the cradle of the Christian, Jewish and Islamic religions and give the middle east relatively stable religious societies for the past hundred years. Do you really think that we would have been as engaged in Central Africa, a place with little recoverable oil reserves, for the past hundred years as we have been in the MIddle East? Obviously, not. Would we have been as strongly engaged in a religiously peaceful ME over that same time? I would say yes.

  6. 6.

    Liberal Masochist

    April 22, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    At the risk of posting too much. One addendum to my anti-Wilfred screed since he said I dodged this question: If a Dem wins the election and we get the promised quick withdrawal (let’s say 6-9 months with most troops home), it will not be because the new President has a different less favorable view of Israel. It will be because campaign promises were made to end the war and the cost of blood and treasure has been far more than enough. Bush does not care about this, that’s why we are not out. I hope whoever wins does care and does the right thing and ends it.

  7. 7.

    Keith

    April 22, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    ThinkProgress has been on this for a while now. He went back on the Israel part, but then TP brought up the point that there is also an earmark for military housing funding. It’s one of those issues you really can’t soundbite without getting smacked with another exception over and over again.

  8. 8.

    Chris O.

    April 22, 2008 at 9:05 pm

    Dug, the point is that he claims he can save all this money by eliminating earmarks, but it turns out there is lots of that money that McCain doesn’t want to go anywhere. Yeah, you could give the money another way, but then there would be no savings, which was McCain’s whole point.

    Logic. It’s what’s for dinner.

  9. 9.

    MJ

    April 22, 2008 at 9:09 pm

    Just because the aid was part an earmark in the past it doesn’t mean it has to be that way in the future.

    If it were Iran, we’d begin bombing in five minutes.

    If you can’t figure out the differences between the two countries then you are hopeless.

  10. 10.

    Soylent Green

    April 22, 2008 at 9:15 pm

    Here is your argument: You are saying the main reason we have been engaged FOR DECADES in the Middle East is because of our support for Israel and that the primary reason we invaded, tragically lost 4000 soldiers and continue to stay in is because of too much fealty to Israel and their lobby.

    Are you waiting for Wilfred to concede that the Jews and their lackeys might not actually control everything this country does? Good luck.

  11. 11.

    calipygian

    April 22, 2008 at 9:20 pm

    If you can’t figure out the differences between the two countries then you are hopeless

    Right. Our “friends” (who, BTW, have killed more American servicemen than Iran ever has) shouldn’t be stealing our nuclear secrets or bombing our ships unprovoked in international waters.

  12. 12.

    MJ

    April 22, 2008 at 9:28 pm

    calipygian you are hopeless.

  13. 13.

    Liberal Masochist

    April 22, 2008 at 9:36 pm

    SG – I guess not. I never realized that was his deal. I seem to recall him being somewhat sensible on most things. Maybe I had him confused with another person. The unhinged anti-Israel rants were out of proportion to what was being said.

  14. 14.

    Soylent Green

    April 22, 2008 at 9:56 pm

    I seem to recall him being somewhat sensible on most things.

    That’s what I thought at first, and tried to engage him, and foolishly let him push my buttons. Read yesterday’s thread, “The Uproar Over Carter,” to see Wilfred drop the gloves, especially toward the end. It’s a classic display of spittle-flecked insanity.

  15. 15.

    Martin

    April 23, 2008 at 1:28 am

    McCain knows that it’s an earmark. That’s his thing. If he knows anything he knows that.

    Either he’s gonna drop it or he’s gonna make it formal and permanent. Either way a lot of people will stand up and take notice. It needs to be addressed.

    Has anyone considered that it’s been an earmark and not part of the formal budget for specific and good reasons?

    And I actually like the general direction McCain is heading on this. Unfortunately, he’s justifying it in a manner that will make him have to explain all kinds of shit and give the Dems a TON of attack points. Had he presented it not as a cut spending deal (which is a loser because you get killed over it) but due to putting spending under proper Congressional and Executive control, then it’s still a tough sell, but you can sell it much more concisely.

    What’s stupid is he’s selling out the tool that his congressmen use to get reelected and get hookers and stuff with. His ground game is gonna suck in November as it is and here he’s screwing over one of the groups that could help him address that since they are all up for re-election as well. They’re natural partners, but not now.

    If he’s lying out his ass (maybe) it won’t be hard to flush that bird out into the open either.

  16. 16.

    TenguPhule

    April 23, 2008 at 2:18 am

    Our “friends” (who, BTW, have killed more American servicemen than Iran ever has) shouldn’t be stealing our nuclear secrets or bombing our ships unprovoked in international waters.

    At this point in time, America has no standing to bitch about anything any other country does to them. We’ve done worse.

  17. 17.

    Wilfred

    April 23, 2008 at 2:56 am

    We’re enemies; that’s fine with me. Our battlefield is the hearts and minds of ordinary Americans who have been exposed to only one side of the story for the past 40 years. I think people should get as much information as possible, think for themselves and make a decision.

    That’s not what you want.

    Here is your argument: You are saying the main reason we have been engaged FOR DECADES in the Middle East is because of our support for Israel and that the primary reason we invaded, tragically lost 4000 soldiers and continue to stay in is because of too much fealty to Israel and their lobby. Your emphasis on Israel is totally out of whack with reality.

    If we had not shown such blind support for Israel, the Arabs would have given us their oil. Did that occur to you while you were concocting this imbecilic dodge? The only thing that ordinary Arab Muslims have asked from the United States is fair treatment vis-a-vis the Palestinians and the Israelis. It has never happened, because of Exxon, no doubt; certainly not the Israel lobby – which doesn’t even exist.

    Arabs/Muslims despise Israel for its treatment of Palestinians, its ongoing usurpation of Arab land and it most recent destruction of much of Muslim Lebanon.

    The United States supports these actions on behalf of whom? Oil interests?

    The issue was, is and will continue to be Palestine. The suffering of Palestinians is not due to oil, but to the oppression and tyranny of Israelis, aided and abetted by the most powerful lobby in Washington.The littering of southern Lebanon with American made cluster bombs has nothing to do with oil. It has everything to do with the tacit acceptance of American jews in Israeli oppression of a helpless people

    Every jew here wrings his hands and laments what Israel does. You’re all Liebermans to me – ‘progressives’ about everything except the one thing that matters.

  18. 18.

    MNPundit

    April 23, 2008 at 2:59 am

    You know if McCain really WERE going to cut foreign aid to Israel that would be a huge weight in his favor.

    But even if he wanted to do that, AIPAC makes that politically impossible, and of course, if you want to go batshit insane, you can say something about the Mossad and Kennedy. That theory was actually created by an Arab Anti-Semite but it’s kooky enough that I thought I’d bring up here.

  19. 19.

    merl

    April 23, 2008 at 6:29 am

    Why do we give Israel so much money? And why do we fight their wars?

  20. 20.

    MJ

    April 23, 2008 at 8:41 am

    And why do we fight their wars?

    Israel fights its own wars and has done a pretty good job at it.

  21. 21.

    MJ

    April 23, 2008 at 8:41 am

    And why do we fight their wars?

    Israel fights its own wars and has done a pretty good job at it.

  22. 22.

    chopper

    April 23, 2008 at 10:03 am

    You’re all Liebermans to me – ‘progressives’ about everything except the one thing that matters.

    ah, the plight of the single-issue voter. the war in iraq, the shitty economy, skyrocketing food and energy prices, global warming, health care, global terrorism, the shredding of the US constitution, astronomical debt and deficits, cronyism and corruption, none of that matters.

  23. 23.

    chopper

    April 23, 2008 at 10:15 am

    what’s also idiotic about wilfred’s statement – joementum is a ‘progressive’ anywhere else?

    you mean joe lieberman, right?

  24. 24.

    Wilfred

    April 23, 2008 at 5:03 pm

    Oy vey! Timing is everything.

    Pollard prosecutor: Latest NY spy arrest shows Israel lied to U.S.
    The Associated Press
    Published: April 23, 2008

    NEW YORK: The arrest of a man accused of passing U.S. military secrets to the same Israeli handler as convicted spy Jonathan Pollard confirms that the espionage ring was larger than previously believed and that the Israelis lied about it, a former prosecutor said.

    “The similarities are quite eerie,” said Joseph E. diGenova, the U.S. attorney who oversaw the 1980s-era Pentagon spy scandal that ensnared Pollard.

    A criminal complaint filed Tuesday in Manhattan federal court “clearly indicates there were other Americans being asked at other military installations to do the same things the same way,” diGenova said. “This was a much larger espionage operation with sleeper cells in the United States than we understood or could have known at the time.”

    Imagine that. I’ll drop it in on the next open thread – Start spinning.

  25. 25.

    Birdzilla

    April 24, 2008 at 9:31 am

    No more funds to the UN at all why should we have anything more to do with these bunch of tyrants,despots,dictators and terrorists

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road -  ?BillinGlendaleCA - Gold! 1
Image by BillinGlendaleCA (5/10/25)

Recent Comments

  • Bupalos on Brief Media Note (Open Thread) (May 14, 2025 @ 5:24pm)
  • sab on Brief Media Note (Open Thread) (May 14, 2025 @ 5:24pm)
  • Jay on The Gifts That Keep on Giving (May 14, 2025 @ 5:24pm)
  • Bupalos on Brief Media Note (Open Thread) (May 14, 2025 @ 5:23pm)
  • Jay on The Gifts That Keep on Giving (May 14, 2025 @ 5:21pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!