• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

This really is a full service blog.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

I was promised a recession.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

American History and Black History Cannot Be Separated

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

This blog will pay for itself.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

After roe, women are no longer free.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Stats For Dummies

Stats For Dummies

by John Cole|  June 26, 200811:37 am| 46 Comments

This post is in: General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Another thing from that CNN piece on the Heller case is this:

There were 143 gun-related murders in Washington last year, compared with 135 in 1976, when the handgun ban was enacted.

That made me cringe, because now we will have people citing that as if it paints a meaningful picture. It doesn’t, for obvious reasons.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Elitist Revisited
Next Post: Tunch Toy »

Reader Interactions

46Comments

  1. 1.

    Shinobi

    June 26, 2008 at 11:45 am

    I think that there is something that happens to people when they become journalists wherein the part of their brain that may have ever had even the most basic grasp of statistics dies and is replaced by desperate needs for headlines.

    It hurts my statistician’s heart.

  2. 2.

    t jasper parnell

    June 26, 2008 at 11:50 am

    OT John Yoo is getting hammered by the Democrats on Cspan right now. He is a gibbering fool.

  3. 3.

    SpotWeld

    June 26, 2008 at 12:05 pm

    Assuming that the DC population trended upwards over those three decades, wouldn’t that represent a per captia drop?
    (And then you have the whole problem of proving correlation.)

  4. 4.

    Face

    June 26, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    That’s easy. 8 more murders in 22 years. A handgun ban has caused more murders, therefore it sucks and the Court is right. Scalia is a life-saver, literally.

    Statz is phun.

  5. 5.

    ed

    June 26, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    one can’t help but wonder how many of the guns used in those crimes were purchased in places (i.e., MD and VA) where they are not banned.

  6. 6.

    The Other Steve

    June 26, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    That handgun ban was always meaningless. I don’t know why people care.

  7. 7.

    John Cole

    June 26, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    Assuming that the DC population trended upwards over those three decades, wouldn’t that represent a per captia drop?
    (And then you have the whole problem of proving correlation.)

    Well, there are just a whole host of things you would want to look at. Population, relationship to overall crime rates, and so on and so forth- I could rattle off a dozen things you would want to look at to make those numbers have any meaning. As it is, they are just two meaningless numbers.

  8. 8.

    SpotWeld

    June 26, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    As it is, they are just two meaningless numbers.
    Agreed, the relationship to gun control and crime is always going to be contentious.

    It’ll be intersting to see how the effects of this ruling plays out. ($5 says John Lott is already drafing a manuscript about it.)

  9. 9.

    The Other Steve

    June 26, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    It’ll be intersting to see how the effects of this ruling plays out. ($5 says John Lott is already drafing a manuscript about it.)

    And Mary Rosh will have good things to say about said manuscript.

  10. 10.

    Dennis - SGMM

    June 26, 2008 at 12:27 pm

    Just guessing but, I’d imagine that the number of deaths in D.C. due to parachute failure remained the same as well.
    Lies, damned lies and statistics.

  11. 11.

    MobiusKlein

    June 26, 2008 at 12:29 pm

    other points to consider
    1) How many of each stat were actual handgun related murders
    2) How about not cherry picking two years, since there is random fluctuation. (moving average, etc.)
    3) Compare to national trends for similar years
    4) Per-capita?
    5) what about gun crimes in general, not just ones that end in death.
    6) Was there a difference in accidental firearm death & injuries?

  12. 12.

    Dennis - SGMM

    June 26, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    MobiusKlein Says:

    other points to consider

    You’re obviously an elitist and you live in an ivory tower, too! Statistics only have meaning when they’re interpreted in isolation by someone with an axe to grind.

  13. 13.

    Pasota

    June 26, 2008 at 12:35 pm

    … now we will have people citing that as if it paints a meaningful truthy picture. It doesn’t, for obvious reasons.

  14. 14.

    srv

    June 26, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    There were 143 gun-related murders in Washington last year, compared with 135 in 1976, when the handgun ban was enacted.

    John, that was those 30 guys released from Gitmo.

  15. 15.

    srv

    June 26, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    Metropolitan Area Residents

    1980: 3,478,000
    1990: 4,223,000
    2000: 4,923,153

    Percent change, 1990–2000: 16.5%

    U.S. rank in 1980: 8th (MSA)
    U.S. rank in 1990: 8th (MSA)
    U.S. rank in 2000: 8th (MSA)

    City Residents

    1980: 638,333
    1990: 607,000
    2000: 572,059

    2003 estimate: 563,384

    Percent change, 1990–2000: -5.7%

  16. 16.

    dnA

    June 26, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    It paints a meaningful picture, and the picture is this:

    It doesn’t matter what restrictions DC puts on gun ownership when Virginia has none, or will enforce none, and is the single biggest source of illegal firearms for the entire Eastern Seaboard.

  17. 17.

    srv

    June 26, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    Homicide graph

    I make no claims on the accuracy.

  18. 18.

    Zifnab

    June 26, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    It doesn’t matter what restrictions DC puts on gun ownership when Virginia has none, or will enforce none, and is the single biggest source of illegal firearms for the entire Eastern Seaboard.

    Isn’t New York suing Virginia over this?

  19. 19.

    dnA

    June 26, 2008 at 1:04 pm

    Isn’t New York suing Virginia over this?

    Yes, and the NRA released an issue of their newsletter with Bloomberg as an octopus, an image reminiscent of anti-semitic and Nazi propaganda.

    I think New York City is actually a much better example for determining whether or not a gun ban is effective, since they aren’t sitting adjacent to the biggest illegal gun market on this side of the country.

  20. 20.

    Dennis - SGMM

    June 26, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    It doesn’t matter what restrictions DC puts on gun ownership when Virginia has none, or will enforce none, and is the single biggest source of illegal firearms for the entire Eastern Seaboard.

    You’d think that being the site of the worst shooting rampage in the history of the country would make them consider tightening up their laws and enforcement.

  21. 21.

    Brachiator

    June 26, 2008 at 1:13 pm

    Another thing from that CNN piece on the Heller case is this:

    There were 143 gun-related murders in Washington last year, compared with 135 in 1976, when the handgun ban was enacted.

    That made me cringe, because now we will have people citing that as if it paints a meaningful picture. It doesn’t, for obvious reasons.

    I don’t think it matters one way or another. I’ve seen some credible evidence that alcohol related deaths declined during Prohibition. This does not prevent Prohibition from being a stupid idea and an unnecessary restriction of individual liberties by the government.

  22. 22.

    Martin

    June 26, 2008 at 1:16 pm

    You’d think that being the site of the worst shooting rampage in the history of the country would make them consider tightening up their laws and enforcement.

    But it was an asian kid who did it, that’s why they’re trying to make asians illegal instead. Harder to conceal and the white kids might actually be able to get into college again.

  23. 23.

    The Other Steve

    June 26, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    I don’t care what the numbers are, the DC handgun ban was stupid and meaningless.

  24. 24.

    dnA

    June 26, 2008 at 1:20 pm

    You’d think that being the site of the worst shooting rampage in the history of the country would make them consider tightening up their laws and enforcement.

    Well the guy who sold guns online to Seung-Hui Cho and the Illinois shooter, both of whom had histories of mental illness, is now actively working to make it legal to carry concealed weapons on college campuses.

    He just wants college kids to be safe.

  25. 25.

    bootlegger

    June 26, 2008 at 1:26 pm

    ($5 says John Lott is already drafing a manuscript about it.)

    And $10 says it’s as bad as all his other “research”. Nobody will publish this guy in a peer-reviewed journal and it’s not because of his politics. His peers, like me, know that his research is gibberish.

  26. 26.

    bootlegger

    June 26, 2008 at 1:32 pm

    now actively working to make it legal to carry concealed weapons on college campuses.

    Interestingly, Scalia concluded with a note that this ruling should have no effect on other gun prohibitions and he specifically mentions schools.

  27. 27.

    dnA

    June 26, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    The real question is how many conservatives will no question the legitimacy of the 5-4 for ruling the way they did with the GITMO case. I believe back then, 5-4 meant that the decision shouldn’t really count.

  28. 28.

    ET

    June 26, 2008 at 1:38 pm

    One of the reasons DC was big on keeping this is because Virginia laws are such the it seems like a 2 year old could buy a weapon and because many of the weapons ended up in DC. So the “logic” follows – less chances of buying with DC out of the mix would hopefully mean less guns in DC. Obviously not totally logical but there it is. This ruling obviously won’t affect all those people who would illegally buy a gun regardless of the law – ’cause if they are buying it illegally they are doing so for a reason.

  29. 29.

    Dennis - SGMM

    June 26, 2008 at 1:44 pm

    So the “logic” follows – less chances of buying with DC out of the mix would hopefully mean less guns in DC. Obviously not totally logical but there it is.

    The decision came as a relief to me. I was planning to rob every bank in D.C. but I didn’t want to carry a handgun because that would be illegal.

  30. 30.

    myiq2xu

    June 26, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    It seems marksmanship in DC has improved slightly since 1976.

    When I joined the Army in 1978 there were 3 guys in my basic training unit that were from DC. All three had scars from being shot.

  31. 31.

    Zifnab

    June 26, 2008 at 1:52 pm

    You’d think that being the site of the worst shooting rampage in the history of the country would make them consider tightening up their laws and enforcement.

    I’m sure the popularity of guns-for-everyone shows and fairs wasn’t helped by the incident. But you aren’t going to change the gun-culture in Virginia overnight, no matter how many people get shot.

    But gun violence is the sort of thing that eventually solves itself. Like MADD pushing hard against drunk driving, its really just a matter of time before people get sick enough of the violence that they mobilize.

  32. 32.

    myiq2xu

    June 26, 2008 at 1:56 pm

    I should add: They were the only ones with those scars.

  33. 33.

    myiq2xu

    June 26, 2008 at 1:57 pm

    But gun violence is the sort of thing that eventually solves itself.

    Like the ending to Reservoir Dogs?

  34. 34.

    Cris

    June 26, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    This reminds me of the graph that Lowtax posted in a GBS thread about gun laws. It had no legend, no units, just two axes with a jagged line drawn through the field. As expected, several people jumped on it to accuse him of bias on one side or other.

  35. 35.

    Dennis - SGMM

    June 26, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    But you aren’t going to change the gun-culture in Virginia overnight, no matter how many people get shot.

    Haven’t spent much time in Va. so I have a question; does the Virginia gun culture feel threatened by any move to regulate gun sales? Or is the trade so lucrative that any attempt to tighten the law is met with a well-funded “They’re trying to take away our guns” campaign?

  36. 36.

    Tom65

    June 26, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    According to the NRA, DC’s violent crime rate should be about nil by this time next week.

    No?

  37. 37.

    dnA

    June 26, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    According to the NRA, DC’s violent crime rate should be about nil by this time next week.

    Obviously there are many conservatives who oppose the ban on constitutional principle, but what irritates me is the number who oppose it because they fantasize that a confrontation between them someone breaking into their home will kind of resemble the end sequence of Birth of A Nation.

  38. 38.

    Stevenovitch

    June 26, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    they fantasize that a confrontation between them someone breaking into their home will kind of resemble the end sequence of Birth of A Nation.

    Are you implying that it wouldn’t?

  39. 39.

    scarshapedstar

    June 26, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    Homicide numbers have really exploded since 1776, when there was no gun control anywhere. QED.

  40. 40.

    Chuck Butcher

    June 26, 2008 at 3:10 pm

    I’ve pretty much noticed that in my little very rural community the War on Drugs has made it nearly impossible to spend more than 10 minutes trying to find an illegal drug. I love to watch the very people whose heads exploded over FISA get in an uproar over this ruling. Pretty sacred cow based set of ethics don’t ya think?

    Oooooh it goes bang, evil evil. You get your knickers in a knot about a thing and ignore the real problems. How very Bush-like to propose to me that your perception of security trumps a right. Oh yeah, piss and whine about guns while you ignore the War on Drugs, dislocation of wealth, plutocratic stomping of the under class, institutionalized ghettos, incarceration rates, drop out rates, oh just a couple of things that relate to a failed society.

    Guns are like drugs in the sense that if you want one you can get one, it may be hot or sold illegally, but you can get one. Blaming VA for DC’s problems is on par with blaming Iraq for 9/11 or “hate us for our freedoms.” DC is a clusterfuck for its own reasons (you could look at the clusterfuck at its center) and guns have never been unavailable in DC, only a problem for law abiding citizens.

  41. 41.

    John

    June 26, 2008 at 3:43 pm


    Assuming that the DC population trended upwards over those three decades, wouldn’t that represent a per captia drop?
    (And then you have the whole problem of proving correlation.)

    The DC population has not trended upwards over those three decades.

    DC population 1970 – 756,510
    DC population 1980 – 638,333
    DC population 1990 – 606,900
    DC population 2000 – 572,059
    DC population 2007 – 588,292

    Basically, population trended sharply downwards until 2000, and then headed back slowly back up again. But it’s still considerably smaller than it was in 1976.

  42. 42.

    bartkid

    June 26, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    >in 1976
    Hey, isn’t that the year of the Oil Embargo?

    Guns don’t kill people, high gasoline prices do!

  43. 43.

    dnA

    June 26, 2008 at 8:54 pm

    Oooooh it goes bang, evil evil. You get your knickers in a knot about a thing and ignore the real problems. How very Bush-like to propose to me that your perception of security trumps a right. Oh yeah, piss and whine about guns while you ignore the War on Drugs, dislocation of wealth, plutocratic stomping of the under class, institutionalized ghettos, incarceration rates, drop out rates, oh just a couple of things that relate to a failed society.

    Can you clean the straw up off the floor now please?

  44. 44.

    Brachiator

    June 26, 2008 at 11:18 pm

    Chuck Butcher Says:

    Oooooh it goes bang, evil evil. You get your knickers in a knot about a thing and ignore the real problems. How very Bush-like to propose to me that your perception of security trumps a right. Oh yeah, piss and whine about guns while you ignore the War on Drugs, dislocation of wealth, plutocratic stomping of the under class, institutionalized ghettos, incarceration rates, drop out rates, oh just a couple of things that relate to a failed society.

    The stomping of the underclass was pretty much completed during the first 6 months of the Bush Administration, which then proceeded to decimate the middle class. But by getting the middle class to cling to their guns and the false promise of tax cuts, they were lulled into supporting Bush. Until the current recession started biting them in the ass.

    And who cares about drop-out rates when the sitting president is one of the most ignorant dolts to ever serve as a chief executive anywhere, anytime, in the known universe.

    DC is a clusterfuck for its own reasons and guns have never been unavailable in DC, only a problem for law abiding citizens.

    You are only half-right here. So called “law abiding citizens” don’t have any problems getting guns. Many of them already have guns. And you don’t have any answer for the “law abiding citizens” with legal firearms who decide to murder spouses, co-workers or family members (Deputy Arrested After Wife Is Fatally Shot).

    An investigation is under way into the fatal shooting of an East County woman. Her sheriff’s deputy husband said it was an accident, but he is now facing murder charges.

    Investigators said Lowell Bruce, 40, fatally shot his wife, Kristen Marie Maxwell-Bruce, 38, to death on Thursday night at their home in Alpine. An official with the San Diego County Medical Examiner’s office said she was officially pronounced dead at 11:48 p.m.

    Oh, yeah. The previously law abiding deputy shot his wife in the jaw while their son looked on.

  45. 45.

    Glocksman

    June 27, 2008 at 8:53 am

    Strange, as I have yet to hear of the Brady Campaign or any other gun control group propose disarming the police in order to prevent them from killing their spouses.

    There are examples you can use, but that particular one was an epic fail.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. The Worst Statistics is No Statistics » The Adventures of Tobasco da Gama says:
    June 26, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    […] Mark Chu-Carrol likes to say that the worst math is no math. John Cole brings us an example from CNN. I posted a comment on their article, but it’ll probably get bigger exposure here. (Assuming CNN’s moderators approve it at all.) This was the offending quote: There were 143 gun-related murders in Washington last year, compared with 135 in 1976, when the handgun ban was enacted. […]

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • NotMax on Pudd’n Boots (Open Thread) (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:33pm)
  • Sister Golden Bear on Pudd’n Boots (Open Thread) (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:31pm)
  • Spanky on Pudd’n Boots (Open Thread) (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:30pm)
  • Chetan Murthy on War for Ukraine Day 394: Bakhmut Still Holds! (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:28pm)
  • Spanky on Pudd’n Boots (Open Thread) (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:28pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!