• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.

People are complicated. Love is not.

The next time the wall wtreet journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

This blog will pay for itself.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Not all heroes wear capes.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

This fight is for everything.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Why did Dr. Oz lose? well, according to the exit polls, it’s because Fetterman won.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

I was promised a recession.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2008 / Get Ready for the Next Round of Hissy Fits

Get Ready for the Next Round of Hissy Fits

by John Cole|  July 1, 20081:42 pm| 88 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008

FacebookTweetEmail

Can you believe Wesley Clark said this about John McCain:

“Senator McCain probably wouldn’t get that much praise from this group. I can’t speak for them, but we all know that Senator McCain, as high-ranking as he is, his record in his last command I think was somewhat less than stellar.”

I am outraged. I can not believe anyone would say that. How dare Wesley Clark demean McCain’s service like that? Obama better distance himself from those remarks.

Oh, wait. I read that wrong. This is what was actually said, and it was said by McCain supporter Orson Swindle:

“General Clark probably wouldn’t get that much praise from this group. I can’t speak for them, but we all know that General Clark, as high-ranking as he is, his record in his last command I think was somewhat less than stellar.”

And, as we all know, Republicans questioning the service of Democrats is perfectly acceptable- I doubt this even makes the cable shows tonight, and I am certain that Andrea Mitchell will not be hyperventilating for hours on end. At some point I am going to internalize the notion that you can’t be patriotic unless you are a Republican, and unless your military service is used to elect Republicans, your opinions don’t matter. Right now, though, I just don’t understand it.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The NRA Doubles Down
Next Post: Cry Baby »

Reader Interactions

88Comments

  1. 1.

    myiq2xu

    July 1, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    I don’t know, this Orson guy sounds like a fraud to me.

  2. 2.

    Cols714

    July 1, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    This has been going on for years. Anything the Democrats say gets blown out of proportion and context. Remember when John Kerry fucked up a joke? Of course you do, it was on cable 24/7. Now you have a Republican doing what the media said the Democrats did, devaluing someone’s military service. But what will you hear? Crickets.

    This isn’t the first time, nor will it be the last, especially this election season.

  3. 3.

    El Cid

    July 1, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    John Cole is learning.

    Military service makes Republicans into heroes who ought to be not just elected but retroactively installed into power.

    Military service makes Democrats into callous fake warriors who shouldn’t dare mention their service because it just shows how fake and meaningless their commitment to America is; unless of course if they are appearing on TV to talk about how only Republicans and right wing hawk policies can KeepUsSafe.

  4. 4.

    Salty Party Snax

    July 1, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    Of course, we all know just how tall John McCain stood for John Kerry when his military service record was questioned by Bush surrogates.

    So what is the problem here?

  5. 5.

    crack

    July 1, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    Countdown to ThymeZone saying Obama should put out a statement supporting Orson Swindle.

  6. 6.

    Punchy

    July 1, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    Now McCane is blasting Obama over remarks Senator Webb said. Professional crybabies. They’re literally acting like Democrats.

    FWIW, they should do this daily. Haul one military guy out after another to question if McCane’s POW status is reason enough to make him Preznit. After the 392nd McCane denounciation, maybe McCane will finally lose it and go all Shawn Chacon on a reporter.

  7. 7.

    Cols714

    July 1, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    For the love, Republicans gave out bandaids to mock John Kerry’s purple heart awards (did I get that right). I had forgotten this. Yet the media has decided that Democrats hate the military.

    Honestly, I used to blame Gore and Kerry for losing their elections. But I now blame the media. If we had a fair media, there’d be no way either of those guys would have lost.

    It’s the media. Not the candidates that deserve the blame. There is nothing Democrats can do to stop this. Good thing the electorate hates the Republicans for this election cycle.

  8. 8.

    mrmobi

    July 1, 2008 at 1:56 pm

    Well, I dont’ know if he’s a fraud, but that last name! Shouldn’t political campaign operatives be required to have last names like “Forthright?” What’s next, communications director Jonathon Ratfucker?

    John, I know you don’t like Wesley Clark (for reasons unclear to me, but seems to have to do with Michael Moore or a certain unnamed anti-war mother who protested outside of Bush’s ranch.) That aside, I’m now beginning to believe that all this kerfluffle was deliberately orchestrated by the Obama campaign. McCain is now venting at remarks made by Webb. Is this part of a strategy to keep the guy sounding off in the hopes of a major gaffe? (to which he is quite prone)

    However, you are correct, this latest actual smear of Clark will be off the radar for Andrea Mitchell and Mika B. Mika B., especially is totally pushing the NBC line these days, complete with “scowls” whenever someone suggest St. McCain is less than perfect.

  9. 9.

    BFR

    July 1, 2008 at 1:56 pm

    Countdown to ThymeZone saying Obama should put out a statement supporting Orson Swindle.

    I just want to know what councilman Les Whinen has to say about this.

  10. 10.

    Jay

    July 1, 2008 at 1:57 pm

    Friends, countrymen, I give you Wilber the Cat:

    http://tinyurl.com/65g44v

    Also, the name “Orson Swindle” seems oddly appropriate in this current dustup.

  11. 11.

    Tsulagi

    July 1, 2008 at 1:58 pm

    Now McCane is blasting Obama over remarks Senator Webb said.

    Why shouldn’t he? It works. He got him to step on Clark on demand.

  12. 12.

    DragonScholar

    July 1, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    I have to wonder how our troops feel about military service being mocked, questioned, and misused, and watching legitimate questions be turned into fake attacks.

    Then I remember they’re busy on their third tours of duty, trying to keep their lives together, and battling a callous medical system. So I figure they’re a bit busy to analyze this.

  13. 13.

    4tehlulz

    July 1, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    I wonder if anyone will point out that Clark leads McCain in wars won, 1 to 0.

    Just sayin’, that’s kind of an important metric in a military pissing contest.

  14. 14.

    Zifnab

    July 1, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    … his record in his last command I think was somewhat less than stellar. Petreaus in ’08”

    We’re judging Generals on their war records now? ORLY? Someone should tell every general currently serving in Iraq right away that their political fortunes in the eyes of the Republican Party are totally on the line if they don’t shape up. *laughs*

    But seriously, what trillion dollar cluster fuck military boondoggle was Wesley Clark part of that I never got to hear about?

  15. 15.

    Zifnab

    July 1, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    FWIW, they should do this daily. Haul one military guy out after another to question if McCane’s POW status is reason enough to make him Preznit. After the 392nd McCane denounciation, maybe McCane will finally lose it and go all Shawn Chacon on a reporter.

    As a Houstonian, and an Astros fan, I find your statement totally awesome.

  16. 16.

    cyntax

    July 1, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Why shouldn’t he? It works. He got him to step on Clark on demand.

    Yes, but turning the other cheek to Republican attacks is the shrewd thing to do–it’ll win that vital center-thingy over any month now.

  17. 17.

    myiq2xu

    July 1, 2008 at 2:05 pm

    Countdown to ThymeZone saying Obama should put out a statement supporting Orson Swindle.

    When Obama endorses Bush’s decision to launch preemptive nuclear strikes on Iran, TZ will claim it was a shrewd political move.

  18. 18.

    Wilfred

    July 1, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    Goddammit. What the fuck happened to standing up to loudmouth bullies? Wes Clark is, he stood by everything he said.

    The way to deal with McBlowhard is to stand to your guns and not back down.

  19. 19.

    myiq2xu

    July 1, 2008 at 2:07 pm

    But seriously, what trillion dollar cluster fuck military boondoggle was Wesley Clark part of that I never got to hear about?

    Tuzla?

  20. 20.

    crack

    July 1, 2008 at 2:08 pm

    Goddammit. What the fuck happened to standing up to loudmouth bullies?

    Silly Wilfred, what you do is label your base as loud mouth bullies and throw them under the bus. That is how the Democrats won all those elections from 98 to 04.

  21. 21.

    cleek

    July 1, 2008 at 2:09 pm

    GOP = gaggle of pussies

  22. 22.

    Dreggas

    July 1, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    myiq2xu Says:

    But seriously, what trillion dollar cluster fuck military boondoggle was Wesley Clark part of that I never got to hear about?

    Tuzla?

    Well bosnia wasn’t a trillion dollar clusterfuck despite the republican panty wetting over it. Funny….it was the dem who got us in and out quickly…

  23. 23.

    w vincentz

    July 1, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    I must be suffering a memory lapse…
    Who was the guy that gave the North Vietnamese the flight paths of the US aircraft on their bombing runs so they could reposition their anti-aircraft weapons?
    Who was the guy that dissed the peasant that jumped into a Hanoi lake to save his broken ass after he had been shot down trying to bomb the peasant and his family?
    Who was the guy that repeatedly gave propaganda out on the NV radio?
    Who IS this “war hero”?
    I honestly can’t remember.

  24. 24.

    JL

    July 1, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    Why oh why isn’t MSNBC talking about the McCain’s camp latest whine on Jim Webb. Is it because they realize most sane Amerians would say what?? This might help Obama after all because the McCain camp seems to be overreaching.

  25. 25.

    Delia

    July 1, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    At this point McCain is coming across as a hysterical drama queen who can’t stand to have anyone ask any questions about his story without his head exploding.

    Or am I missing something about Real Men?

  26. 26.

    Tsulagi

    July 1, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    Yes, but turning the other cheek to Republican attacks is the shrewd thing to do—it’ll win that vital center-thingy over any month now.

    Yep, it’s that Bob Shrum strategery Dems are famous for. Playing not to lose by caving is always a sure winner.

  27. 27.

    crack

    July 1, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    On the whole what should Obama do on any given thing question, I’d like to say that I think John Cole should be his target. I’m not kidding, JC is a former Republican sick of what Republicans have become. If Obama chooses policies that don’t alienate his base and JC can get behind then I think he can win big. That is my biggest problem with his FISA cave, he’s not going to gain anything. People like JC aren’t for it, only the Bush dead enders are and there is no way Obama is getting their votes. Obama should run all his policy decision by JC, and if JC considers them too close to Bush Obama should run from them. Any proposal JC, twice a Bush voter, considers too close to Bush will definitely alienate people who never thought much of Bush. There is no upside to that, it will just make people stay home.

  28. 28.

    malraux

    July 1, 2008 at 2:20 pm

    What I love about the Republican smear and outrage machines is that the smear apparatus sets the beyond the pale standard and then the outrage machine blames the other side for doing something that is only slightly similar. In this case, swiftboating. But similarly, an impeachment of the president over a blowjob was the overreach of the smear machine, while only the DFH dare to say that maybe Bush should be impeached.

  29. 29.

    dorkboy

    July 1, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    Wrap your heads around this one…

    If Obama names Colin Powell as his Veep, you know they’ll use these gimmicks to “discredit” him. That would be real “through the looking glass”, mind-bending stuff.

  30. 30.

    Delia

    July 1, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    See, here’s the thing about hysterical male drama queens like McCain. I know this because my ex used to act this way. They rant and cuss and bully when you challenge them. But it’s all drama designed to get their way because they’re deathly afraid of being found out. If you just hold your ground and act like a grown-up, they eventually collapse into the emotional babies they really are. So if anybody will actually stand up to old McMaverick and not fall for his bullshit, we can all get past this nonsense.

  31. 31.

    4tehlulz

    July 1, 2008 at 2:27 pm

    >>If Obama names Colin Powell as his Veep

    Other than for megalulz, there is absolutely no reason to do this. Just no.

  32. 32.

    Twisted Martini

    July 1, 2008 at 2:28 pm

    Orson Swindle also publishes the best college football blog on the planet, Every Day Should Be Saturday. But he’s a Florida bigot, so what do you expect?

  33. 33.

    CapMidnight

    July 1, 2008 at 2:29 pm

    I don’t know, this Orson guy sounds like a fraud to me.

    Even Mork isn’t returning his calls.

    And you military guys! Stop bickering! What will the War Czar think?!
    (Has anyone heard from the War Czar lately? I hope he’s okay.)

  34. 34.

    Chuck Butcher

    July 1, 2008 at 2:30 pm

    Pick your fights intelligently and then speak clearly and carefully – works wonders. Clark made a 1/2 slip by being a bit flip about being shot down… You can’t do it.

    Make it about judgement and policy, don’t go there. It’s a win, why fuck around with the POW issue. Vietnam doesn’t disqualify McCain, leave it the fuck alone, you just give him the opportunity to wave his busted up self at you and say, “see what I did for you”

  35. 35.

    Grover Cleveland

    July 1, 2008 at 2:31 pm

    Zifnab, re: shawn chacon and the astros

    I wish there was a video of that somewhere. I was out of town when that happened and missed what had to be some great local talk radio on that.

    Now, it would be great if McCain went Jon Chaney on the reporter.

  36. 36.

    rawshark

    July 1, 2008 at 2:31 pm

    At some point I am going to internalize the notion that you can’t be patriotic unless you are a Republican, and unless your military service is used to elect Republicans, your opinions don’t matter. Right now, though, I just don’t understand it.

    Do you not understand it or just don’t believe you also used to feel the same way?

    Its amazing how the world looks when you actually let yourself see it. (Not a diss, I’m a bad writer, keep that in mind)

  37. 37.

    libarbarian

    July 1, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    Who was the guy that gave the North Vietnamese the flight paths of the US aircraft on their bombing runs so they could reposition their anti-aircraft weapons?

    I could torture you into handing over your mother for gang-rape.

  38. 38.

    nightjar

    July 1, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    Poor Wes Clark, Obama threw him under the bus and now the wingnuts are having their way with him. LOL

    First, Wes Clark is a big boy and can take care of himself. A former 4 STar General and combat decorated soldier. He’s not running for anything and is not on Obama’s payroll. He is doing his part for the Dem cause by challenging the very core of the Mccain campaign, and I would be highly surprised if the Obama camp wasn’t in on it. He’s acting similar to the VP role of attack dog, where the potus candidate steers clear. Nothing unusual about this story.

  39. 39.

    Steve V

    July 1, 2008 at 2:41 pm

    The GOP definition of “attacking someone’s service” is of course intolerably broad, and I like the idea of Clark and Webb pecking away at him, but what really has me seething is the fact that McCain takes the stage to whine about it all locked in arms with a frigging swift boater! The optics of this should be absolutely terrible for McCain, but the media is working overtime to puff his ass.

  40. 40.

    cyntax

    July 1, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    Yep, it’s that Bob Shrum strategery Dems are famous for. Playing not to lose by caving is always a sure winner.

    Yeah, there is a little military tradition that I’m hoping Obama internalizes (and frankly until the last couple weeks, I thought he had). It’s the Infantry motto: “Follow me,” as in lead from the front.

    Here’s Chris Bowers (from Open Left) on why discrediting Clark is good for the rightwingers:

    How important is Wesley Clark to the Democratic cause? Consider that, in 2006, he was the single most requested surrogate by Democratic congressional campaigns around the country…
    No one in the entire country is more important to Democratic credibility on foreign policy than Wesley Clark. No one. And this isn’t just my opinion, it is the opinion of Democratic congressional candidates who requested him.
    …
    Going well beyond this media cycle, and even going beyond this presidential election, Republicans score a huge strategic victory if they are able to permanently damage the credibility of the leading Democratic spokesperson on national security.
    …
    This news cycle will come and go with little impact on the campaign, but losing Wesley Clark as a credible, effective national spokesperson would be a big blow to our cause. So, even if Obama doesn’t want to, step up today and defend Wesley Clark. We need to fill in where other Democrats fail.

    Link to votevets petition here. And for y’all that aren’t vets, it’s for regular, upstanding citizens too, so get hot.

  41. 41.

    Incertus

    July 1, 2008 at 2:47 pm

    First, Wes Clark is a big boy and can take care of himself. A former 4 STar General and combat decorated soldier. He’s not running for anything and is not on Obama’s payroll. He is doing his part for the Dem cause by challenging the very core of the Mccain campaign, and I would be highly surprised if the Obama camp wasn’t in on it. He’s acting similar to the VP role of attack dog, where the potus candidate steers clear. Nothing unusual about this story.

    Reminds me a bit of Marc Antony. “John McCain is an honorable man.”

  42. 42.

    Stevenovitch

    July 1, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    Last night on the news they had the whole Wes Clark thing and they played the quote directly. “Riding in a jet and getting shot down doesn’t qualify you for president.” They then proceeded to express the news equivalent of outrage… and nobody laughed?

    Are we really so far gone that “serious” people can be taken seriously while arguing that getting shot down does in fact qualify you to be president?

    How many pilots were shot down in Viet Nam anyway? Are they all qualified to be President? More so than the ones that weren’t shot down? If so, why? Bleh…

  43. 43.

    Punchy

    July 1, 2008 at 2:49 pm

    If Obama chooses policies that don’t alienate his base and JC can get behind then I think he can win big.

    I think BaLak Obama should hire Cole as a consultant. Think of it: he gets some military cred/advice by a guy who actually used Army vehicles without crashing them, he gets insight on how to appeal to the above-all-else-important Appalachia voters (I suspect Barry will need to pimp either coal, meth, or the relative unimportance of teeth and/or plumbing), while giving a kinda guy-to-guy jungle fever/redneck-finds-Scary-Negro-acceptable flavor to the Eastern seaboard voters.

    A win-win. Of course, that’ll force John to reduce his discussions on kitten skull-fucking on this blog, but that’s OK.

  44. 44.

    4tehlulz

    July 1, 2008 at 2:54 pm

    JC 4 VP

  45. 45.

    RSA

    July 1, 2008 at 2:55 pm

    Now McCane is blasting Obama over remarks Senator Webb said.

    …which involved asking McCain to “calm down” about the military stuff. Longer Webb: “Calm down, Grandpa, or you’ll have another ‘attack’. Isn’t it time for your nap?”

  46. 46.

    Stevenovitch

    July 1, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    he gets some military cred/advice by a guy who actually used Army vehicles without crashing them

    You should re-watch the Wes Clark interview. According to the media, it’s the actual crashing of the vehicle that qualifies you.

  47. 47.

    Zifnab

    July 1, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    JC 4 VP

    Beat me to it.

  48. 48.

    crw

    July 1, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    Hmm. This just in from Ben Smith. Obama isn’t defending Clark, but he did just zing the media:

    I guess my question is why, given all the vast numbers of things that we’ve got to work on, that that would be a top priority of mine?” Obama said, responding to a reporter who asked the candidate why he hadn’t called on Wesley Clark to apologize for his remarks yesterday. “I’m happy to have all sorts of conversations about how we deal with Iraq and what happens with Iran but the fact that somebody on a cable show or on a news show like General Clark said something that was inartful about Sen. McCain I don’t think is probably the thing that is keeping Ohioans up at night.

    (Emphasis mine)

    Shorter Obama: why the fuck are you obsessing over this bullshit?

  49. 49.

    Gus

    July 1, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    but the fact that somebody on a cable show or on a news show like General Clark said something that was inartful about Sen. McCain I don’t think is probably the thing that is keeping Ohioans up at night.

    Well done.

  50. 50.

    4tehlulz

    July 1, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    I fully support trolling the media. The best part is that they have no choice but to pay attention to him.

  51. 51.

    nightjar

    July 1, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    Clark made a 1/2 slip by being a bit flip about being shot down… You can’t do it

    Yea, he didn’t phrase that well at all. I suspect that since Clark had previously been shopping this line of attack, that Schiefer knew as much and found a way to drop it on Clark. He should have been ready and not been so short, and flip about MCcain being shot down.

  52. 52.

    Joshua Norton

    July 1, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    Judgment is important, and Senator McCain has switched his stance on so many of his former policies one has to wonder if he himself really knows what he stands for anymore. Any time anyone questions his judgment or abilities he accuses them of “dirty politics”. His surrogates accuse them of not respecting his military record. If you can’t question a person’s ability then we will end up with another George W. Bush……Heaven forfend.

  53. 53.

    joe

    July 1, 2008 at 3:10 pm

    Um, yeah, that “less than stellar” record includes the last military victory the United States accomplished.

  54. 54.

    Wilfred

    July 1, 2008 at 3:11 pm

    Right, don’t question McCain. So on October 20th, when Bush attacks Iran and all hell breaks loose and the NATION IS AT WAR then we’ll be able to question his qualifications.

    He who backs off now will not be allowed to speak when the country is FACING ITS DARKEST HOUR and needs A REAL AMERICAN HERO.

  55. 55.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    July 1, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    According to the media, it’s the actual crashing of the vehicle that qualifies you.

    Not quite.. Scheiffer said “riding” in a plane so the actual qualification for Presidency is derived from *being in a crash* (since “crashing of the vehicle” necessarily implies McCain was piloting it.)

  56. 56.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    July 1, 2008 at 3:31 pm

    Damn ads. For a minute I thought PajamasMedia was serving grilled fish fillets..

  57. 57.

    bebop

    July 1, 2008 at 3:31 pm

    TV news except for Olbermann and Abrams somewhat is so enamored and in the tank for McCain

  58. 58.

    Dennis - SGMM

    July 1, 2008 at 3:34 pm

    Republicans: “Look what they’re saying about a hero!”
    The Rest of America: “Go ahead and gas up the car, honey. The kids really like mac and cheese. They won’t mind eating it the other three days of the week.”

  59. 59.

    Face

    July 1, 2008 at 3:35 pm

    Shorter Punchy: Getting elected is like getting laid. You will say anything and everything it takes to get her naked and in bed, and only after the deed will you dare to tell that, actually, you’re not a doctor, and oh by the way, does she know anyone who can get you a job and a way out of your parent’s basement?

  60. 60.

    Krista

    July 1, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    but the fact that somebody on a cable show or on a news show like General Clark said something that was inartful about Sen. McCain I don’t think is probably the thing that is keeping Ohioans up at night.

    Good point. Unfortunately, the media has become so goddamn self-important that they’ll just become harder on Obama for this. They’re so used to the mutual arselicking of the last 8 years that when a Dem calls them on their shameful lack of journalistic skills, the shrieks of fury will be ear-shattering.

    “Ohioans will be kept up at night by what we TELL them should keep them up at night!”

  61. 61.

    TR

    July 1, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    I am certain that Andrea Mitchell will not be hyperventilating for hours on end.

    Hyperventilating is a polite term. Throwing a fucking hissyfit is more accurate.

    She had a segment with Clark today. She actually claimed that the MoveOn.org ad with the mom and the baby, the one that takes on John McCain for the “hundred years” comment, was somehow part of an evil leftist plot to denigrate Saint McCain’s service in Vietnam.

    No, really. What the everloving fuck?

  62. 62.

    nightjar

    July 1, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    BREAKING NEWS — McCain Camp’s head officially explodes. OMG. It’s a conspiracy, they’re all out to get me MCcain screams. Cool cat war hero loses cool. Now just a grouchy old conspiracy nut.

  63. 63.

    Ed Drone

    July 1, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    Not quite.. Scheiffer said “riding” in a plane so the actual qualification for Presidency is derived from being in a crash (since “crashing of the vehicle” necessarily implies McCain was piloting it.)

    Well, McPain managed to crash several multi-million-dollar planes in his “stellar” career. He was a “hot shot” for sure. You know, with his fairly well-known penchant for wine, wimmin and song more wimmin, it’s a wonder he doesn’t have a string of DUIs to hide, too.

    If someone went looking for those….

    Ah, well, the uproar over his defaulting on property taxes on one of his (wife’s) many houses should be reaching a crescendo soon, right?

    [Cue crickets]

    Sigh

    You know, we should make a bigger deal of the media treatment of the candidates instead of attacking the opposing candidate. It might get more press.

    [Cue more crickets]

    Sigh

    Ed

  64. 64.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    July 1, 2008 at 3:39 pm

    Shorter Longer And Clearly Inebriated Punchy: Getting elected is like getting laid. You will say anything and everything it takes to get her naked and in bed, and only after the deed will you dare to tell that, actually, you’re not a doctor, and oh by the way, does she know anyone who can get you a job and a way out of your parent’s basement?

    Fixt.

  65. 65.

    Incertus

    July 1, 2008 at 3:40 pm

    In the meantime, the White House is declaring more victory in Iraq, I guess to let us move forward into victory in Iran.

  66. 66.

    BFR

    July 1, 2008 at 3:43 pm

    Don’t see much in the way of commenters noting that Clark had made more or less the same point a week or two ago and went sorta unnoticed. I think this is calculated – one of the primary roles he can play in this campaign is to lead the attacks on McCain’s biography since he’s really the only one who can do so.

    I think this was a calculated move – he said it once, no one responded. I believe that what we’re seeing is the intended effect – it was designed to elicit a right-wing freakout.

    I don’t know why you’d want to do this but I just don’t see how this can possibly be an accident.

  67. 67.

    Wilfred

    July 1, 2008 at 3:46 pm

    I’d like to see candidates of both parties take it directly to journalists themselves and accuse them of partisanship to their faces. Why pretend otherwise?

    Delia is right, and Webb is just the guy to call them on their collective vapors. They are protesting way too much and have just tipped their hand, I reckon.

  68. 68.

    mrmobi

    July 1, 2008 at 3:48 pm

    Clark made a 1/2 slip by being a bit flip about being shot down…
    You can’t do it (if you’re a Democrat)
    fixed for accuracy

    I watched the Face the Nation piece, and I disagree. He wasn’t being flip, he was challenging the idea that being a prisoner of war doesn’t necessarily rise to the level of being a qualification to be POTUS, and he’s spot-on.

    That was a nice takedown of the media by Obama, btw.

    I must be suffering a memory lapse…
    Who was the guy that gave the North Vietnamese the flight paths of the US aircraft on their bombing runs so they could reposition their anti-aircraft weapons?
    Who was the guy that dissed the peasant that jumped into a Hanoi lake to save his broken ass after he had been shot down trying to bomb the peasant and his family?
    Who was the guy that repeatedly gave propaganda out on the NV radio?
    Who IS this “war hero”?

    I thought someone would get to this eventually. You’re not suffering a memory lapse, but a lapse in judgement. John McCain was tortured for several years. Don’t you get that? His captors took pleasure in beating his already broken arms. He refused release until his comrades were also released. I despise McCain for his policies and his lack of conviction, but I honor his outstanding and heroic service.

    Now, maybe you think you could stand up to torture and be a proud American and not give any information to the enemy. Some have. Most have not. This does not diminish their service in any way.

    To their credit, the Obama campaign and their surrogates have not gone near this stuff, and they shouldn’t, because McCain performed heroically, by anyone’s definition.

    Do you really want to belong to a political party which stoops to the same level the Republicans did in denigrating Kerry’s service?

  69. 69.

    Stevenovitch

    July 1, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    Since we seem to be in the business of comparing the honor of military service, can someone please explain to me how anyone came up with the conclusion that Clark’s service record is inferior to McCain’s? Or how Kosovo could be considered anything other than a stellar success when compared with the current situation?

    I really really don’t want to believe these people just pull random shit out of their ass… there has to be some attempt at logic here.

  70. 70.

    mrmobi

    July 1, 2008 at 4:05 pm

    …can someone please explain to me how anyone came up with the conclusion that Clark’s service record is inferior to McCain’s? Or how Kosovo could be considered anything other than a stellar success when compared with the current situation?

    Well, let’s see, he was a Rhodes Scholar and Supreme Commander of Allied Forces and led during a war which we won, which wasn’t for oil, but to rescue people from genocide. Sounds inferior to me. Did I mention there wasn’t any oil?

    The big problem that the Party of Torture has with Wesley Clark is that he didn’t hire enough private contractors during the war, and there weren’t enough no-bid contracts.

    Democrats don’t understand that they need to make wars more profitable for the private sector, even if that extends to actually harming the troops through negligence. It’s just a cost of doing business to them.

  71. 71.

    Svensker

    July 1, 2008 at 4:20 pm

    Gen. Clark oversaw a successful military operation in Kosovo. (One with which I vehemently disagreed, but that’s neither here nor there.) Nevertheless, the Tighty Righties think he’s a failure. Some pickings from various rw posts today:

    And who better than Wes Clark? Being relieved of command (read “fired”) by Gen. Shelton following the Kosovo campaign inspires loads of confidence in him. I guess he has to ingratiate himself with BHO seeing how his courtship of Hillary was for naught

    Call him “Gen. Chutzpah.”

    General Wesley Clark is riding high on what is universally considered his prescience about the current Iraq war. Going unremarked is his utter lack of prescience about his own war, in Kosovo in 1999.

    Back then, Clark thought he had Slobodan Milosevic figured out, and that the mere threat of NATO bombing — and perhaps a day or two of the real thing — would bring him to the negotiating table and force him to be reasonable. When this turned out not to be the case, Clark had no Plan B,

    See? So Clark has no credentials, so insulting his military service is good. Besides, no real generals are Democraps.

    It really is time to move to the island.

  72. 72.

    Fledermaus

    July 1, 2008 at 4:26 pm

    can someone please explain to me how anyone came up with the conclusion that Clark’s service record is inferior to McCain’s? Or how Kosovo could be considered anything other than a stellar success when compared with the current situation?

    Easy. McCain is a Republican. Iraq is a Republican war (with a assist from dems in need of a spine).

  73. 73.

    T. R. Phillips

    July 1, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    Why does no one mention the “Manchurian Candidate” aspect of McCain’s imprisonment. It would be hard to prove that he wasn’t drugged and hypnotized repeatedly by the North Vietnamese/Russians. They had some pretty sophisticated techniques of post-hypnotic suggestion, if the CIA is to be believed. Does McCain wake up at 2:00 AM whispering, “Push the red button, push the red button. . .”?

    It wouldn’t do any good for journalists to ask McCain if he was brainwashed by the North Vietnamese, because he would have been programmed not to remember it.

  74. 74.

    LanceThruster

    July 1, 2008 at 5:20 pm

    Isn’t it the Rethuglicans who paraded a bevy of military experts on the take who were assigned to push the war in the media? Seems to me they even had a few who had bogus credentials to boot.

    Gen. Clark needs to buy a bus that says “The Straight Talk Express” (gonna be one cheap come November) because he really says it all.

  75. 75.

    Sock Puppet of the Great Satan

    July 1, 2008 at 6:18 pm

    “I can’t speak for them, but we all know that General Clark, as high-ranking as he is, his record in his last command I think was somewhat less than stellar.”

    That’d be winning a war in a few months with no U.S. casualties. Yup, I can see how a GOPer would see that as a failure.

  76. 76.

    jen hutchin

    July 1, 2008 at 7:00 pm

    Gen Clark is right about McCain and right about the war. Republicans can bloviate all they want–McCain is losing by a landslide.

  77. 77.

    pinola

    July 1, 2008 at 7:13 pm

    I used to like Mika, probably because Scarborough is such a total dick and he was always interrupting her and shamelessly dumping on her because he had to get some ‘brilliant’ totally WRONG observation in or some lead ballon pathetic attempt at a joke – I was also just so glad when he was gone all those weeks because I was actually able to watch it. But this is sleazy.

  78. 78.

    pinola

    July 1, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    What Senator said ‘Clark should be cut loose?’ next on KO

  79. 79.

    pinola

    July 1, 2008 at 7:21 pm

    pearl-clutching over Webb’s comments

    this.is.insane

    pass.the.revolver.NRA

  80. 80.

    Dave_Violence

    July 1, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    I’ll tell you what pissed of this right-winger: some Al Gore flunkie calling Bob Kerry a cripple. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pwwi/is_200002/ai_mark07002113

  81. 81.

    Jess

    July 1, 2008 at 8:28 pm

    Well bosnia wasn’t a trillion dollar clusterfuck despite the republican panty wetting over it. Funny….it was the dem who got us in and out quickly…

    To be fair, he did have a lot of practice…

  82. 82.

    Neo

    July 1, 2008 at 9:31 pm

    “inartful” now ranks up there with “inoperative”

    “This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative.”

    What could be next ?

  83. 83.

    Bert Chadick

    July 1, 2008 at 9:39 pm

    While I’m not a believer in luck, as such, McCain has got to be considered one profoundly unlucky guy. He came very close to sinking the USS Forrestal and killing 130 sailors in an accident with a missile while awaiting on deck. After being cleared of culpability, he was shot down in short order. Spending years being tortured cannot be thought of a lucky turn, and neither was his membership in the Keating Five during the biggest scandal to that date, the S&L debacle. Now he has the Republican nomination for president in a year when Jeezus his-own-self couldn’t get elected as a Republican. Like I said, profoundly unlucky.

  84. 84.

    mumu

    July 1, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    well, McCain at least found that zombie-looking wife with millions of dollars in her trust fund, so that might offset all that bad luck at the end of the day.

  85. 85.

    Bob UK

    July 2, 2008 at 2:15 am

    Dont you guys over there have differing stanced News Stations – like one pro left / one pro right ? Or a truly Nuetral Channel ?
    It seems from reading around that all the stations are currently nuzzling McCains arse and each is promoted as non-bias?

    I’m sure I’m probably as blind to BBC or CH4’s news bias though I do seem to see pos / neg on each stance, and 2 opposing views sitting on a couch together arguing.
    How comes you seem to get 3 people all Totally biased, just sitting around agreeing with eachother with big smiles tearing the Dems to pieces ??

  86. 86.

    Original Lee

    July 2, 2008 at 9:28 am

    Quite a few men were shot down over Vietnam (including one of my cousins). Quite a few men were tortured. But McCain is probably the only one of that group who married someone rich enough to support his ambition to be POTUS. Don’t you know you get experience points for gold as well as for combat?

  87. 87.

    The Mantis

    July 2, 2008 at 10:33 am

    Only a Republican would deem the management of the Kosovo war (how many US casualties?) by the valedictorian of West Point as “somewhat less than stellar.” If that was somewhat less than stellar, I’d hate to hear how the Iraq War would be described…

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice says:
    August 18, 2008 at 5:58 pm

    […] First, Orson Swindle really doesn’t have much credibility on most things, and is a particularly amusing choice when you are trying to defending McCain from these charges based on his military service, as it was Orson Swindle who was smearing Wes Clark just a few weeks ago: […]

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • A Streeter on Sunday Morning Open Thread: Kevin McCarthy, Out of His Depth in the Congressional Wading Pool (Jan 29, 2023 @ 11:27am)
  • oldgold on Sunday Morning Garden Chat: October Garden (Jan 29, 2023 @ 11:24am)
  • Betsy on Late Night Open Thread: America’s Rural Dependents Cousins (Jan 29, 2023 @ 11:23am)
  • What Have The Romans Ever Done for Us? on Late Night Open Thread: America’s Rural Dependents Cousins (Jan 29, 2023 @ 11:23am)
  • evodevo on Sunday Morning Open Thread: Kevin McCarthy, Out of His Depth in the Congressional Wading Pool (Jan 29, 2023 @ 11:22am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!