• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

Take your GOP plan out of the witness protection program.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

Every one of the “Roberts Six” lied to get on the court.

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

The willow is too close to the house.

So many bastards, so little time.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / Ross Douthat On Helms

Ross Douthat On Helms

by John Cole|  July 7, 20083:21 pm| 31 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Folks on the right might want to listen to Ross on this issue:

But a specific ad is one thing; Helms himself is another. He simply was an awful bigot, and worse he was an awful bigot who never expressed a shred of remorse, so far as I know, for his toxic approach to issues ranging from civil rights to HIV to foreign affairs. Far from being the sort of politicians who conservatives ought to defend, out of a sense of issue-by-issue solidarity, he’s the sort of politician conservatives ought to carefully distance themselves from, because his political style brought (and continues to bring) intellectual disrepute to almost every cause with which he was associated. Inherent to conservatism is the responsibility to stand up and say to bien-pensant opinion: Just because a bigot opposes something doesn’t mean it’s a good idea. But the necessity (and difficulty) of making that case, whether the issue is affirmative action or “comprehensive” immigration reform or the NEA and Piss Christ, is all the more reason for conservatives to keep their distance from actual bigots, even (or especially) when they’re representing the great state of North Carolina in the U.S. Senate. Jonathan Rauch had it right in 2002: If Ronald Reagan and Helms had similar positions on countless issues, that doesn’t prove that Helms was good for conservatism; it only suggests that conservatives should look for more Reagans, and fewer Jesse Helms. I’m happy to defend Helms’ views on a variety of issues, but the man himself has no business in the right-wing pantheon, and the conservatives who have used his death as an occasion to argue that he does are doing their movement a grave disservice.

Is the era of Helms-like bigotry finally nearing an end?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The Cost Of War
Next Post: Running Man »

Reader Interactions

31Comments

  1. 1.

    PaulW

    July 7, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    Is the era of Helms-like bigotry finally nearing an end?

    No. Obama’s headed to a two-term spell in the White House, remember? We’re already seeing the flare-ups of ‘code words’ and race-baiting on the far-right blogs if not the swift-boat ad makers. Just wait for the GOP convention, especially if Pat Buchanan makes a reprise of his 1992 Nuremburg speech.

  2. 2.

    cleek

    July 7, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    Is the era of Helms-like bigotry finally nearing an end?

    the recent unpleasantness Obama encountered in the Appalachian states suggests that we haven’t.

  3. 3.

    gbear

    July 7, 2008 at 3:35 pm

    No, although the era of electing anyone with Helms-like bigotry may be.

  4. 4.

    calipygian

    July 7, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    Fred Barnes and his disgraceful performance on Fux Nooz Sunday suggests that Helmsian levels of stupidness are still alive and well when it comes to Sodomites.

  5. 5.

    El Cid

    July 7, 2008 at 3:42 pm

    But there would be no Reagan without Helms — the two and their movements are inextricably linked.

    And it is completely wrong to view Helms as just the simpleton bigot — for 7 years he was the Executive Director of the North Carolina Bankers’ Association. This is no marginal figure brought in by economic elites — he was both. When he spoke for the Tobacco Radio Network, he represented one of the most powerful economic constituencies in the entire South.

    Right On for the New Right

    TIME MAGAZINE | Monday, Oct. 03, 1977

    …They claim to be the New Right, but several of the themes—and faces—are old. In 1972 Richard Nixon buried his New Left opponent with the help of some of the same issues that are current today. Many of the leaders are familiar: Ronald Reagan, 67, Barry Goldwater, 68, North Carolina Senator Jesse Helms, 55. As Viguerie puts it, they are “spokesmen, not leaders. They can bring audiences to their feet, but then they leave the hall, and everything stops.” Viguerie believes that conservatives skipped an entire generation of leadership: “In the ’30s, ’40s and ’50s, we did not graduate young leaders like the Kennedys and the Udalls on the left. But there is a different breed of conservative coming on the scene now.” These include Laxalt, 55, and Viguerie, 44, and a group of aggressive Republicans: Utah Senator Orrin Hatch, 43, Illinois Congressman Phil Crane, 46, and California State Senator Bill Richardson, 49.

    Like the liberals, the new New Right leaders dismiss past conservatives as “reactionaries.” Scoffs Lyn Nofziger, a longtime Reagan aide: “The old right were talkers and pamphleteers. They would just as soon go down in flames as win. But the New Right has moved toward a more pragmatic goal of accomplishing things.”…

    …But inflammatory issues, whatever their emotional impact of the moment, are not enough to build and sustain a major conservative movement. Arnold Steinberg, a political strategist who has worked for Helms and former Senator James Buckley, believes that an alliance based on these gut issues would attract at best one-third of the electorate. Further recruits can be gained only by reaching out to groups who normally vote Democratic, largely on such bread-and-butter issues as creating more jobs and fighting inflation.

    Many New Right leaders seem to be rising to the challenge. They are welcoming and searching out Democratic defectors and trying to shed their country-club image of Wasp exclusivism. Says the Free Congress Committee’s Weyrich: “In the past, we conservatives have paraded all those Chamber of Commerce candidates with the Mobil Oil billboards strapped to their backs. It doesn’t work in middle-class neighborhoods.”…

    …These days the leaders of the New Right are not talking seriously about forming a third party—the idea is too impractical. That leaves them only one way to gain national power: by taking over the G.O.P. Clearly it is far too early to say whether or not they will be able to succeed, but even if they do, they would still have problems. Although they are more pragmatic about techniques these days, the New Rightists tend to be just as purist as the old right on the issues. Hewing a hard ideological line would be no way for the beleaguered G.O.P. to boost its membership: it now commands only 20% of the national electorate….

  6. 6.

    Jamey

    July 7, 2008 at 3:46 pm

    No. Not the end. Not by a long-shot. And Douche-hat knows it.

    A lot of Conservatives are drawn to the GOP precisely because they’re the party of Jesse Helms and his ilk. I suspect the GOP will just get better at hiding the “crazy aunt” contingent of their party every four years or so.

  7. 7.

    El Cid

    July 7, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    The problem for the country was that the ‘”crazy aunt” contingent’ of the Republican Party took over the Party and ran much of the country’s agenda for the last 30 years and had absolute power over all branches of government from 2002 – 2006.

    You think that if Jesse Helms had been President he would have nominated someone crazier and more incompetent than John Bolton to a diplomatic position?

  8. 8.

    Zifnab

    July 7, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    If Ronald Reagan and Helms had similar positions on countless issues, that doesn’t prove that Helms was good for conservatism; it only suggests that conservatives should look for more Reagans, and fewer Jesse Helms.

    Hurray Reagen!

    Here’s a man who was definitely not a bigot. His gutting of civil rights and economic reforms during the 80s, his opposition to AIDS research and treatment, and his warmongering in the Middle East at the expense of the American Taxpayer were performed entirely on ideological grounds and were in no way motivated by racial insensitivity.

    Launching a crusade against the invisible Cadillac driving Welfare Queens and raising the ante on the billion dollar drug war while funneling cash to the drug-peddling Iran-Contras – these are the policies we should look for in a national leader. Speaking ill of black people? That should be confined to our yachts and country clubs, because it really bruises our image.

    Hurray Reagen!

  9. 9.

    nightjar

    July 7, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    Is the era of Helms-like bigotry finally nearing an end?

    Hell no same racism, just a different shade of color.

  10. 10.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    July 7, 2008 at 4:29 pm

    Why do we care what Ross Douthat thinks? I quit reading MY because the two of ’em with those hideous roundtables spiked my nerdometer. I saw one with Ambinder and it was all I could do to keep from punching the screen. These are the sorta mouth-breathin’ know-it-all fatboys that give liberalism a bad name. Never had to do an actual days work in their entitled lives but they got all the fucking answers for the rest of us.

  11. 11.

    NewUnansweredQuestions

    July 7, 2008 at 4:34 pm

    It was pointed out today on CNN that Barack Obama will make his acceptance speech to the Democratic Convention on the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream speech. (Today we are informed that this speech will be made outdoors to a crowd of about 75k people).

    45 years and we have a pretty good chance of seeing a black American president. I’m not sorry that Helms is dead, but I wish he had lived to see Obama sworn in as president. I can’t think of a better repudiation of Helms’ foolish and mean-spirited “values” than that.

  12. 12.

    jake

    July 7, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    Is the era of Helms-like bigotry finally nearing an end?

    Sure John, and you’ll get a pony and 72 virgins for Christmas.

  13. 13.

    bob

    July 7, 2008 at 4:42 pm

    Reagan was shit, too. As was Nixon, Bush Sr, and now that I think of it, everyone who voted for Dubya is shit, too.

  14. 14.

    AnneLaurie

    July 7, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    Far from being the sort of politicians who conservatives ought to defend, out of a sense of issue-by-issue solidarity, he’s the sort of politician conservatives ought to carefully distance themselves from, because his political style brought (and continues to bring) intellectual disrepute to almost every cause with which he was associated.

    Douthat, who is all about surfaces, neatly encapsulates the “New” Conservatism: All your bigotry should be disguised behind a shiny plastic facade of “reasonableness” and “comity”. As El Cid says, those of us who were old enough and smart enough to be progressives during the Reagan Era knew perfectly well that Saint Ronnie was the well-mannered, nicely-dressed frontman for the evil little thugs like Helms; there were a lot of cartoon trophes and jokes about that particular dynamic duo back in the day.

    Helms — and Newt Gingrich, the Baby Boomer Richard Nixon — are temporarily out of favor with the “Right” people and their courtiers the Media Village Idiots because their aggressive me-first ugliness disturbs the glassy surface of the Politics-Is-Only-Another-Sporting-Event sump pond. But the only real difference between Jesse Helms and Mitt Romney is that Willard had the luck to be born pretty and rich instead of ugly and middle-class; they’re both vicious selfish sorry excuses for human beings.

  15. 15.

    Delia

    July 7, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    I think Grover Norquist was the recent respectable gooper clown who called Obama “John Kerry with a tan.” And he’s the supposedly libertarian wing of the VRWC. So much for the demise of racism.

    And then we mustn’t pass up on Kevin Drum’s comment on Bush’s elegy to Helm’s:

    QUOTE OF THE DAY….From George Bush, on the passing of Jesse Helms:

    Jesse Helms was a kind, decent, and humble man and a passionate defender of what he called “the Miracle of America.” So it is fitting that this great patriot left us on the Fourth of July.

    Uh huh. I guess Bush must figure that even 10% of the black vote is 10% more than the GOP needs. This should just about do the trick of getting it down to zero.

    I’d say that playing to the racist base is doing just fine.

  16. 16.

    jake

    July 7, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    He simply was an awful bigot, and worse he was an awful bigot who never expressed a shred of remorse, so far as I know, for his toxic approach to issues ranging from civil rights to HIV to foreign affairs.

    Oh yes my dear simply dreadful. We didn’t want him in our nice non-bigotted little party but that terrible brute forced his way in and we were too polite to show him the door. I feel absolutely faint at the very thought of the way he would make such coarse comments about our dear friends the darkies, the fags and the filthy wogs.

  17. 17.

    joeyess

    July 7, 2008 at 5:35 pm

    Is the era of Helms-like bigotry finally nearing an end?

    Hardly. It’s in their DNA. Bigotry is the only way they know how to win. Nixonian playbook, page 1.

    Divide, then act the victim when called on it. It’s worked for decades and they’ve put little thought to any other tactic.

    Helms is the GOP. They can’t change without losing for years. And losing can’t be countenanced.

  18. 18.

    joeyess

    July 7, 2008 at 5:35 pm

    Is the era of Helms-like bigotry finally nearing an end?

    Hardly. It’s in their DNA. Bigotry is the only way they know how to win. Nixonian playbook, page 1.

    Divide, then act the victim when called on it. It’s worked for decades and they’ve put little thought to any other tactic.

    Helms is the GOP. They can’t change without losing for years. And losing can’t be countenanced.

  19. 19.

    Adam

    July 7, 2008 at 6:04 pm

    Far from being the sort of politicians who conservatives ought to defend, out of a sense of issue-by-issue solidarity, he’s the sort of politician conservatives ought to carefully distance themselves from, because his political style brought (and continues to bring) intellectual disrepute to almost every cause with which he was associated.

    Bringing international disrepute implies that there’s some intellectual value to conservative ideas like “screw the gays” and “screw the feriners.”

    I’m happy to defend Helms’ views on a variety of issues

    Which ones, Ross?

  20. 20.

    Adam

    July 7, 2008 at 6:05 pm

    international intellectual

  21. 21.

    prufrock

    July 7, 2008 at 6:24 pm

    I’ve spent the past few days in the Montgomery, Alabama area visiting my sister (she’s stationed at Maxwell AFB). While I’ve been here, I’ve seen multiple Confederate flags displayed in front of houses, as well as several different Republican candidates for state and federal office campaigning as the best choice because they are conservative Christians with conservative Christian values. Now, as we know, conservative Christian values in this part of the country translate as “we know you hate darkies and fags, and so do we.” So no, I don’t think Helms-like bigotry is dead, not by a long shot (at least in this part of the country).

    Speaking of repugnant political strategies, I saw something a couple of days ago here in sweet home land on the micro level that I had previously noticed only at the macro level. A woman (whose name escapes me) running for some minor state office had an ad on TV that promised she would fight to keep liberal environmentalists from raising gas prices. Yes, the new strategy is not to blame high fuel costs on speculation, increased demand, peak oil, or some combination of the three. No, four dollar a gallon gas is the fault of the liberals. Not “liberals who won’t let us drill in the ANWR and off the Florida coast.” Even that specious reasoning is too subtle for the average Alabama Republican politician. No, it’s just the fault of the liberals, period, end of sentence.

    In other words, the new strategy is the old strategy. It’s also another reason why I don’t think the southern strategy is going away any time soon. The Republican Party is like a garage punk rock band that only knows three cords. They have a limited set list, but they’ll bang it out with their amps set to eleven all night long.

  22. 22.

    JGabriel

    July 7, 2008 at 6:30 pm

    John Cole:

    Is the era of Helms-like bigotry finally nearing an end?

    No, Douthat is merely discovering that Helms-like bigotry is a continuing feature of the Republican party.

    .

  23. 23.

    Delia

    July 7, 2008 at 6:54 pm

    Speaking of repugnant political strategies, I saw something a couple of days ago here in sweet home land on the micro level that I had previously noticed only at the macro level. A woman (whose name escapes me) running for some minor state office had an ad on TV that promised she would fight to keep liberal environmentalists from raising gas prices. Yes, the new strategy is not to blame high fuel costs on speculation, increased demand, peak oil, or some combination of the three. No, four dollar a gallon gas is the fault of the liberals. Not “liberals who won’t let us drill in the ANWR and off the Florida coast.” Even that specious reasoning is too subtle for the average Alabama Republican politician. No, it’s just the fault of the liberals, period, end of sentence.

    See, it’s thing like that which make me seriously wonder how the Union can hold together. Here in Oregon we have repub Senator Gordon Smith trying to hold onto his seat by releasing ads that pretend he’s a Democrat who has Obama’s endorsement. I just actually wonder if it’s all the same country anymore.

  24. 24.

    Scott H

    July 7, 2008 at 6:57 pm

    Why I can’t read Ross Douthat: Here he suggests that conservatives who promote Jesse Helms do their movement a disservice. How about people who promote Jesse Helms are cut from the same bolt of bigot as Helms?

  25. 25.

    nightjar

    July 7, 2008 at 7:17 pm

    Here in Oregon we have repub Senator Gordon Smith trying to hold onto his seat by releasing ads that pretend he’s a Democrat who has Obama’s endorsement

    And there’s not been much gaffawing amongst the wingnut faithful over this. I think they see the handwriting on the wall saying the Conservative Renaissance (which was co-opted by southern ideologues) is currently circling the toilet bowl.

    It will be interesting how they will react to this loss of power, especially to a black man with his feet up on the Presidential desk.

  26. 26.

    khead

    July 7, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    An end?

    Go review the AP primary election footage from Man.

    Then go have a drink.

  27. 27.

    jake

    July 7, 2008 at 9:14 pm

    Now, as we know, conservative Christian values in this part of the country translate as “we know you hate darkies and fags, and so do we.”

    Begging your pardon but the full translation is: “We know you hate darkies and fags because you feel so dirty when you offer them $20 and a blow job, and so do we.”

    This post brought to you by The Remember Bob Allen is a Republican Foundation.

  28. 28.

    daphne

    July 7, 2008 at 9:16 pm

    No.

    K-Lo wrote an email to Bill Bennett stating that because he has been such a reasonable voice about BLACK values, he would make a fine VP.

    You know, Bennett has always been on the the upside of his people’s problems — he’s a virtual BLACK man on the ticket, you know what I’m sayin’?

  29. 29.

    prufrock

    July 7, 2008 at 10:41 pm

    Begging your pardon but the full translation is: “We know you hate darkies and fags because you feel so dirty when you offer them $20 and a blow job, and so do we.”

    This post brought to you by The Remember Bob Allen is a Republican Foundation.

    I never took part three of the Rosetta Stone language software, wingnut version. Hence, the partial translation.

  30. 30.

    calipygian

    July 8, 2008 at 5:56 am

    You know, Bennett has always been on the the upside of his people’s problems—he’s a virtual BLACK man on the ticket, you know what I’m sayin’?

    Bill Bennett likes shooting dice so he thinks he’s Ashy Larry.

  31. 31.

    Jamey

    July 8, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    You think that if Jesse Helms had been President he would have nominated someone crazier and more incompetent than John Bolton to a diplomatic position?

    Yes, El Cid, I do. Obviously.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Political Action

Postcard Writing Information

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Cold Grey Dawn Open Thread: Polling Hysteria (Sep 26, 2023 @ 5:53am)
  • Bruce K in ATH-GR on Cold Grey Dawn Open Thread: Polling Hysteria (Sep 26, 2023 @ 5:51am)
  • lowtechcyclist on Cold Grey Dawn Open Thread: Polling Hysteria (Sep 26, 2023 @ 5:49am)
  • JPL on On The Road – lamh26 – 2022 Birthday Trip to Italy! (Sep 26, 2023 @ 5:42am)
  • Nukular Biskits on Cold Grey Dawn Open Thread: Polling Hysteria (Sep 26, 2023 @ 5:25am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!