• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Everybody saw this coming.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Not all heroes wear capes.

How can republicans represent us when they don’t trust women?

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

Let there be snark.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Come on, man.

No one could have predicted…

White supremacy is terrorism.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

The revolution will be supervised.

“I never thought they’d lock HIM up,” sobbed a distraught member of the Lock Her Up Party.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2008 / Practice What They Preach

Practice What They Preach

by John Cole|  September 2, 200810:40 am| 74 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008, Religion, Did You Know John McCain Was A POW?

FacebookTweetEmail

I guess it has been a while since we caught one of these guys in a wetsuit or in a park bathroom sting, so the moralizing blowhards are out in force again:

President of the conservative National Clergy Council and Evangelical leader, the Reverend Rob Schenck (pronounced SHANK), who met Sarah Palin when he was a VIP guest at her first appearance with John McCain in Dayton last week said today that her daughter’s pregnancy is “none of our business,” and commended Barack Obama for saying so.

“This is a private family matter. The Palins, especially their teenage daughter, are entitled to privacy on this matter. Anyone who cares about young people will back off and give this young woman the space she needs. Anyone who exploits her for political or commercial gain is disgraceful.”

I agree. I just wish Schenck would take his own damned advice:


Rev. Schenck protesting.

In response to today’s action, the Christian Defense Coalition and the National Clergy Council issued a national call to “the faith community and people of good will” to travel to Florida to pray and plead for Terri Schiavo’s life.

“A society has sunk to it lowest when it abandons the sick and helpless,” Rev. Rob Schenck, president of the National Clergy Council. “Should this prove the end of the line for Terri and her loving family, this will be a deep shame that our country will carry for a terribly long time.”

Schenck was up to his neck in the Schaivo affair, publicly meeting with the lunatic doctor who claimed Schaivo could be rehabiliated (the one who Hannity informed us had won a “Noble Peace Prize In Medicine,”), being arrested for protesting outside the hospice, then publicly questioning the autopsy, claiming that doctors are human and often make mistakes.

Privacy, not really a concept these guys understand, but one they are always demanding when it fits their needs.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « How Deep Was The Vet?
Next Post: A Reckless Gambler »

Reader Interactions

74Comments

  1. 1.

    Warren Terra

    September 2, 2008 at 11:29 am

    In all fairness (I love fairness; don’t you?) iirc Sean Hannity claimed the guy had been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize In Medicine. Of course, pretty much any member of a national legislature is entitled to nominate people for the Peace prize (Milosovec was nominated pretty much as long as he lived) and while there are Nobel Prizes in Medicine (technically, “Medicine Or Physiology”) and in Peace, there aren’t omnibus prizes, but there you are. I wouldn’t want to be unfair.

  2. 2.

    protected static

    September 2, 2008 at 11:33 am

    The Schenck brothers have never been big fans of privacy… Or, more specifically, pregnancy being a private matter.

  3. 3.

    Zifnab

    September 2, 2008 at 11:36 am

    I’m personally a big fan of this find over at Sadly, No! where they blow away Amy Alkon for reversing her policy on moralizing over other peoples’ kids.

    Let’s get real. If this had been one of Barack Obama’s daughters, we’d see non-stop wall-to-wall coverage over how Obama was planning to introduce teenage promiscuity and sexual deviancy to the White House. Some wingtard blowhard would be going on about how the Obama girls would be staining the Lincoln Bedroom with their sins. And there would be endless conjecture over how many other abortions the Obama’s kids have had or were planning to have over the course of the next four years.

    But IOKIYAR, and the daughter of a VP candidate with an (R) next to her name is due far more respect and privacy than her Democratic counterpart.

  4. 4.

    The Moar You Know

    September 2, 2008 at 11:37 am

    If it were Barack’s family, Schenk would be screaming his lungs out over how society demands answers.

    The media will let him get away with it, of course, because fighting dirty is a privilege reserved only for Republicans.

  5. 5.

    jake

    September 2, 2008 at 11:37 am

    “Anyone who exploits her for political or commercial gain is disgraceful.”

    Thanks for that ringing denouncement of Camp McPOW.

  6. 6.

    Gus

    September 2, 2008 at 11:40 am

    Thank you for the reminder (as if I needed one) of what a lackwit Sean Hannity is.

  7. 7.

    smiley

    September 2, 2008 at 11:40 am

    Listening to the first few minutes of Rush’s show confirms that the repubs are in a panic about Palin. Not surprisingly he’s painting Palin to be THE mother in mother-and-apple-pie jingoism. He’s spouting all of the right-wing talking points we were all subjected to over the weekend. He linked attacks on Palin’s daughter to the Obama campaign — you know, the stealth Obama campaign of bloggers. Have there been attacks on Palin’s daughter that I somehow missed? Pathetic… and funny.

  8. 8.

    Tax Analyst

    September 2, 2008 at 11:41 am

    There really ought to be some sort of “Hypocrisy Monitor” out there, like, you know, in the “MainStream Media”, to check out jerks like Schenck and his ilk and publicize their prior posturing. It shouldn’t have to be up to blogs to call these Ass-hats out, but I guess it is.

    But I guess the MSM is too busy with Flag Lapels and calling the Horse Race to bother.

  9. 9.

    jake

    September 2, 2008 at 11:43 am

    Bets: Rev. Schenk will continue to beat the drum for Miss Palin’s privacy.

    But just to let us know how awful it is to talk about her personal business.

    It’s not like he’s an attention whore or anything.

  10. 10.

    lutton

    September 2, 2008 at 11:44 am

    Gee, how does this compare to the media circus around John Edwards?

  11. 11.

    Nim, ham hock of liberty

    September 2, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    There are probably a dozen ways that Sarah Palin could prove the maternity of the new baby, without bringing up her daughter in any way, let alone the fact that her daughter is pregnant.

    THEY made the issue of it.

  12. 12.

    cleek

    September 2, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    Gee, how does this compare to the media circus around John Edwards?

    no comparison. apples and oranges.

    Edwards is a Democrat. you can’t judge the coverage of him by the same standards you’d judge the coverage of a Republican.

  13. 13.

    jrg

    September 2, 2008 at 12:28 pm

    The GOP has been shoving “family values” down everyone’s throat for years, now they want the meanies on the left to stop asking why the 17-year-old, unwed child of their abstinence-only VP pick is pregnant?

    Screw them, for two reasons: first because this does matter as a campaign issue – abstinence-only “education” does not prevent teen pregnancy: Palin’s daughter is a case in point; second, if “family values” are so important, who’s family are we talking about?

  14. 14.

    Zifnab

    September 2, 2008 at 1:05 pm

    second, if “family values” are so important, who’s family are we talking about?

    You have to elect Governor Palin to the Vice Presidency. She needs this job real bad. The woman has five kids to feed, for Christ’s sake.

  15. 15.

    sistermoon

    September 2, 2008 at 1:16 pm

    Speaking of morals, it seems that Caribou Barbie has her own crazy preacher problem:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html
    Guess this takes Reb’n Wright off the table, huh?

  16. 16.

    SmilingPolitely

    September 2, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    John McCain and Sarah Palin need to apologize to those commentators in the communist, fascist, satanist liberal blogosphere. We didn’t force their hand and make them come forward with Sarah Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy. They did it because the National Enquirer was about to out them!

    From the National Enquirer: ” The ultra-conservative governor’s announcement about her daughter’s pregnancy came hours after The ENQUIRER informed her representatives and family members of Levi Johnston, the father of Bristol’s child, that we were aware of the pregnancy and were going to break the news.

    In a preemptive strike Palin released the news, creating political shockwaves.”

    National Enquirer

  17. 17.

    r€nato

    September 2, 2008 at 1:27 pm

    a fundamentalist Republican is a hypocrite? That’s unpossible!

  18. 18.

    Punchy

    September 2, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    Privacy, not really a concept these guys understand, but one they are always demanding when it fits their needs.

    I’m assuming this was in reference to TalkLeft, right? Wha? Seriously, Jeralyn has just instituted an absolute, no-exceptions ban on anything negative at all about Palin. Nothing deleterious is allowed. Period, full stop. Yet she and Big Dick Democrat trashed Obama daily, repeatedly, for MONTHS without a hint of remorse.

    What a piece of work that woman can be. Garbage blog, IMO.

  19. 19.

    4tehlulz

    September 2, 2008 at 1:30 pm

    This kind of hypocrisy would be surprising, if it were not totally predictable.

  20. 20.

    dewberry

    September 2, 2008 at 1:31 pm

    @sistermoon…it’s not just her crazy preacher, it’s what SHE herself said:

    Speaking before the Pentecostal church, Palin painted the current war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act out the will of the Lord.

    “Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

    Religion, however, was not strictly a thread in Palin’s foreign policy. It was part of her energy proposals as well. Just prior to discussing Iraq, Alaska’s governor asked the audience to pray for another matter — a $30 billion national gas pipeline project that she wanted built in the state. “I think God’s will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that,” she said.

    link, again:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html

  21. 21.

    maxbaer (not the original)

    September 2, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    Schenk is right. We do have to lay off the whole dysfunctional Palin family and start heaping the the dysfunctional McCain campaign that put her on the ticket in the first place.

  22. 22.

    jake

    September 2, 2008 at 1:37 pm

    From the National Enquirer: ” The ultra-conservative governor’s announcement about her daughter’s pregnancy came hours after The ENQUIRER informed her representatives and family members of Levi Johnston, the father of Bristol’s child, that we were aware of the pregnancy and were going to break the news.”

    Paging Mickey Kaus. Paging Mr. Mickey Kaus.

  23. 23.

    PeterJ

    September 2, 2008 at 1:37 pm

    I’m assuming this was in reference to TalkLeft, right? Wha? Seriously, Jeralyn has just instituted an absolute, no-exceptions ban on anything negative at all about Palin. Nothing deleterious is allowed. Period, full stop. Yet she and Big Dick Democrat trashed Obama daily, repeatedly, for MONTHS without a hint of remorse.

    What a piece of work that woman can be. Garbage blog, IMO.

    I would argue that this:

    This site will not host personal attacks against Sarah Palin, rumors of a personal nature or a discussion of her personal life or that of her children. All such comments will be deleted and repeat offenders banned.

    isn’t a complete ban on anything negative. But I do agree about the Obama treatment though…
    And I will never be a fan of banning users or removing comments.

  24. 24.

    Joshua Norton

    September 2, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    second, if “family values” are so important, who’s family are we talking about?

    The Repiggies “family values” are the same as their bible thumping values. They’re very important sources for telling OTHER people how to live.

  25. 25.

    The Moar You Know

    September 2, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    Van Halen hates John McCain.

  26. 26.

    Stuck in the Fun House (nj)

    September 2, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    The ENQUIRER informed her representatives and family members of Levi Johnston, the father of Bristol’s child, that we were aware of the pregnancy and were going to break the news.”

    Later the ENQUIRER released a presser expressing their profound disappointment that Johnston had been whisked away by a small spacecraft to “parts unknown”. An intrepid ENQUIRER reporter reportably reported that John Edwards was piloting the ship.

    more to come….

  27. 27.

    The Moar You Know

    September 2, 2008 at 2:24 pm

    John – did Tunch take over as the DBA again? We’ve told you a million times that cats make lousy computer admins.

    This site has been down most of the day.

  28. 28.

    SmilingPolitely

    September 2, 2008 at 2:24 pm

    Hey, it’s the tabloid of record, don’t mock!

  29. 29.

    Joshua Norton

    September 2, 2008 at 2:29 pm

    cats make lousy computer admins.

    Your problems are irrelevant to Technical Support Cat!

  30. 30.

    David Hunt

    September 2, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    – abstinence-only “education” does not prevent teen pregnancy: Palin’s daughter is a case in point

    That argument is emotionally powerful, but logically flawed. Turn it around and you’ll see. It’s the equivalent of saying that a girl who was well educated as the consequences of sex and given free access to birth-control getting pregnant proves that those things only encourage reckless promiscuity.

    The plural of “anecdote” is not “data.”

  31. 31.

    capelza

    September 2, 2008 at 2:36 pm

    What is the Rev. Schenck doing protesting in front of Obama’s Greek temple?

  32. 32.

    jake

    September 2, 2008 at 2:41 pm

    Van Halen hates John McCain.

    And the cradle, will rock…

    Whoops, wrong song. McPOW shows the depths of his loserdom by picking a VH avec SH song.

  33. 33.

    Punchy

    September 2, 2008 at 2:42 pm

    Van Halen hates John McCain.

    /pats self on back….

    Before I clicked that link, I just KNEW exactly what song they must have used. Sho’ nuff, I wuz right.

    With the poll numbers looking bad, I’m guessing they’ll move to “Jump!” next. Or with Palin, maybe “Hot for Teacher”?

  34. 34.

    Dreggas

    September 2, 2008 at 2:45 pm

    SmilingPolitely Says:

    John McCain and Sarah Palin need to apologize to those commentators in the communist, fascist, satanist liberal blogosphere. We didn’t force their hand and make them come forward with Sarah Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy. They did it because the National Enquirer was about to out them!

    From the National Enquirer: ” The ultra-conservative governor’s announcement about her daughter’s pregnancy came hours after The ENQUIRER informed her representatives and family members of Levi Johnston, the father of Bristol’s child, that we were aware of the pregnancy and were going to break the news.

    In a preemptive strike Palin released the news, creating political shockwaves.”

    Pretty sad that the Nat’l enquirer seems to have done a better job vetting the republican vp pick than the republicans did. If I was the MSM I would be PISSED that I keep getting scooped by a tabloid.

  35. 35.

    Josh

    September 2, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    Right Now…Statler wishes he could have chosen Waldorf for VP.

  36. 36.

    Stuck in the Fun House (nj)

    September 2, 2008 at 2:51 pm

    Hey, it’s the tabloid of record, don’t mock!

    Who’s mocking!

  37. 37.

    boonagain

    September 2, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    With McCain, it’s more likely one from David Lee Roth’s solo oeuvre: “Just a Gigolo”

  38. 38.

    Sherrell

    September 2, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    On another note…they are now claiming the democrats have been sexist in their criticisms of Palin…

    sexism + pow = they are never wrong!

  39. 39.

    jake

    September 2, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    The plural of “anecdote” is not “data.”

    True. The data HHS has been able to gather shows it doesn’t work. Of course federally funded AO programs have been rather reluctant to show any data but God forbid we cut off the cash.

  40. 40.

    capelza

    September 2, 2008 at 3:02 pm

    The GOP is accusing anyone of sexism? What are they? Feminazis?

  41. 41.

    Jill Howell

    September 2, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    John, I agree that Bristol deserves privacy and it is wrong to put her in the limelight. Having said that I do think there is a distinction between making the story about Bristol versus Palin having an unwed, 17 year-old daughter. The question is how does a “family values” “abstinence” platform manifest itself. What is “family values” and if you are going to preach it, expecting others to adopt it, shouldn’t one be able to understand the benefit of ascribing to such a stance or understand what substantive difference I can expect in a candidate who ascribes to it versus one who doesn’t?

    It is interesting because in interviews some defenders start to use the word “mistake” when referring to Bristol’s pregnancy and then quickly change it to “situation” as they go on to defend that it happens in all families and how noble Palin is for standing behind her daughter, etc. If you believe in family values shouldn’t a 17 year-old’s unwed pregancy BE a “mistake”, rather than a “situation?” And shouldn’t these people be talking about how troubling it is that it is happening in all these families rather than defending it because it is happening so frequently. I’m saying this, again, only in the context of someone standing for “family values” and “abstinence.” Why is it unfair for me to want to understand what benefit it will be to the country, how will the country be enhanced if everyone were to adopt “family values” and if “abstinence only” was our sex education curriculum?

  42. 42.

    The Moar You Know

    September 2, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    The GOP is accusing anyone of sexism? What are they? Feminazis?

    I saw what you did there.

  43. 43.

    The Moar You Know

    September 2, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    Or with Palin, maybe “Hot for Teacher”?

    It must just be me; I don’t find her attractive. At all.

  44. 44.

    Delia

    September 2, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    I drove 800 miles over the holiday to my sister’s house in Utah. Tuning in wingnut radio over some of the vast empty spaces, as I never do at home, I picked up a creature named Monica Crowley who was spending her Saturday selling the brilliance of Sarah Palin, the apotheosis of Ronald Reagan, if you didn’t know, but prettier and female. This, of course, was before the pregnant daughter story broke. But Monica thought it was SHAMEFUL, JUST SHAMEFUL the way the media had spent the whole year making sexist pig digs at Hillary. I thought it was amazing she’d never bothered to tune in FOX . . . .

  45. 45.

    Cain

    September 2, 2008 at 3:08 pm

    btw why do the people in the picture look like midgets?

    cain

  46. 46.

    SGEW

    September 2, 2008 at 3:10 pm

    Hey hey, here’s a video of Palin’s debate performance in 2006 gubernatorial race (via Sully).

    My take: pretty solid performance (on Gov. Palin’s part) for the most part. No flubs, no bomb shells, just sticks to the evangelical/conservative party line. Not a light weight . . . as far as Alaskan politics goes. With some prep work, she very well might do ok head to head with Sen. Biden (relatively speaking, considering the expectations, of course).

    And speakin’ of data, here’s Pollster.com’s latest presidential tracker: link. w00t!

  47. 47.

    jrg

    September 2, 2008 at 3:11 pm

    That argument is emotionally powerful, but logically flawed.

    So instead I’ll listen to the MSM gush about how being a PTA/Hockey mom prepares someone to be a great president.

    Besides, even if the argument is flawed, does that take the issue of birth control off the table? What’s it going to sound like when Palin discusses her ideas to reduce teen pregnancy?

    I’d like to remind you that birth control was mentioned in Obama’s acceptance speech: (“We may not agree on abortion, but surely we can agree on reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies in this country.”), so it was on the table before yesterday.

    There’s no way that Palin can get out of the discussion on teen pregnancy without either alienating the base, or looking like a fool.

    The plural of “anecdote” is not “data.”

    Right. I guess I’ll have to ask Focus on the Family for records regarding teen pregnancy and abortion among their membership.

  48. 48.

    Anastasius

    September 2, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    That argument is emotionally powerful, but logically flawed. Turn it around and you’ll see. It’s the equivalent of saying that a girl who was well educated as the consequences of sex and given free access to birth-control getting pregnant proves that those things only encourage reckless promiscuity.

    The plural of “anecdote” is not “data.”

    Look at the teenage pregnancy percentages in the US for your data.

  49. 49.

    Cain

    September 2, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    When people start injecting God in that way in a political speech, my bullshit meter goes off. If you wear your faith on your sleeve your probably trying to hoodwink someone. Only crazy religious nuts would fall for that cuz they see God everywhere.

    cain

  50. 50.

    GSD

    September 2, 2008 at 3:19 pm

    The term “politically correct” is being scrubbed from the rightwing mainframes.

    Soon we will witness the Betty Friedanizing of the GOP, they will become the great defenders of career mothers and out of wedlock teen mothers.

    -GSD

  51. 51.

    Zifnab

    September 2, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    The plural of “anecdote” is not “data.”

    I believe its what you call “empirical evidence”. I mean, if I watch the sun rise 1000 times in the east, am I really supposed to conclude that tomorrow is going to be any different?

    Likewise, if a larger percentage of teenagers undergoing abstinence educations are getting pregnant than their comprehensively educated peers, are we supposed to assume that Palin’s kid is a magical outlier who got pregnant because her contraceptive efforts defied the odds?

    Seriously, what were the chances that Bristol was on birth control, much less using a condom? I’m willing to put money down that she was riding bareback without a care in the world.

  52. 52.

    zzyzx

    September 2, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    Confirmation that the husband was an AIP member!

    Could anyone imagine the outcry if Michelle Obama were a member of a black separatist party?

  53. 53.

    SGEW

    September 2, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    [A li’l pseudo-live blog of the 2006 Palin gubernatorial debate]

    Huh. That Palin sure can dodge tricky questions by filling time with buzz words with the best (worst?) of them. Life life, blessed blessed, freedom troops protect strong, progress necessary future, safety communities families. Alaska! Alaska! Alaska!

    Good at short, punchy answers, along the lines of “yes” or “no” (though the questions are really, really parochial and specific to Alaska: one question involves a three mile gravel road*!). This might reflect well on her, especially when compared to Sen. Joe “Bloviator” Biden.

    How her accent might play on the national stage is a tricky question. I have no idea. A plus? A negative? Above my pay grade.

    Another thing: get these Alaskan reporters to moderate the Presidential debates! Miles ahead of the schmucks who’ve been handling it for the national media.

    Summary? She seemed very well informed (on the issues presented, of which several I have no friggin’ idea what they’re talking about – what is the VPSO? What’s the importance of unitary management of fish and game? Beats me), sharp, snappy, self-assured, and a rather smart yet humble presence.

    If the media (and, importantly, Biden (hope you watch this a couple of times before ya hit th’ stage, Joe!)) go into the V.P. debate expecting an “aw shucks” hockey mom who’ll flub and gaffe her way into a laughing-stock . . . she’ll come across as the hands-down winner. Danger! Danger! Beware.

    No wonder she won the Governor race.

    *whoops! That’s the access road to the “bridge to nowhere”! Which she supported, as of 2006! Busted!

  54. 54.

    Kevin

    September 2, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    VPSO == Village Public Safety Officer ; sounds kind of like a volunteer fire department.

  55. 55.

    jibeaux

    September 2, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    At least Bristol’s getting a class act!

  56. 56.

    Cain

    September 2, 2008 at 3:54 pm

    Could anyone imagine the outcry if Michelle Obama were a member of a black separatist party?

    I’m ready to join a separatist party that seperates me from wingnuts.

    cain

  57. 57.

    NR

    September 2, 2008 at 3:55 pm

    Just in – McCain has pulled out of an interview with Larry King because of the beating that Tucker Bounds got last night at the hands of Campbell Brown. Apparently the McCain camp said that was “over the line.”

    Is McCain finally losing his base?

  58. 58.

    jibeaux

    September 2, 2008 at 3:56 pm

    VPSO == Village Public Safety Officer ; sounds kind of like a volunteer fire department.

    Maybe it’s kind of like what Dwight does on The Office.

    Someday, that will come back on…

  59. 59.

    SamFromUtah

    September 2, 2008 at 3:57 pm

    OT, but is anyone blogging whatever’s going on at the Republican convention? The actual event, instead of the fascist-cop scariness and the non-starter hurricane and stuff? I can’t face tuning into it myself.

    What little dribbles I’ve heard about it sound a bit more coherent, or at least varied, than I was expecting. I figured there’d be nothing more than chanting “Freedom” the whole time, or something like that.

  60. 60.

    Punchy

    September 2, 2008 at 3:58 pm

    Could anyone imagine the outcry if Michelle Obama were a member of a black separatist party?

    To be fair, the correct analogy would be if Biden’s wife was a KKK member, White Panther, etc….

  61. 61.

    Stuck in the Fun House (nj)

    September 2, 2008 at 3:58 pm

    Could anyone imagine the outcry if Michelle Obama were a member of a black separatist party?

    Kinda puts a damper on those already made ads showing the Obama’s as radical revolutionary, America hating, secret Muslim terrorists. At least they don’t ascribe to leaving the union. Maybe they can release them after the election and fetch a few pennies on E-Bay.

    Too many mirrors in here!

  62. 62.

    KRK

    September 2, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    Confirmation that the husband was an AIP member!

    Another red flag about Todd Palin that I’ve seen mentioned only a couple of times is that he’s an awfully hands-on political spouse. As in, sitting in on meetings with state government officials who thought they were having private meetings with the governor. As in interjecting himself into troopergate as a person with political authority even when Gov. Palin isn’t present. As in creepy.

  63. 63.

    dewberry

    September 2, 2008 at 4:07 pm

    Also about Todd Palin…there are a bunch of emails that she won’t release from her time in the Governor’s mansion citing executive privilege. The funny thing is, Todd Palin was cc’ed on a lot of them.

    h/t kos, but original story here:

    http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=8802680

  64. 64.

    The Moar You Know

    September 2, 2008 at 4:07 pm

    McCain has pulled out of an interview with Larry King because of the beating that Tucker Bounds got last night at the hands of Campbell Brown. Apparently the McCain camp said that was “over the line.”

    McCain has not done an interview since August 17. He has already threatened to pull out of one of the three scheduled debates because it was to be moderated by Tom Brokaw, who apparently pissed him off. This is a terribly risky strategy and one that I hope he continues to pursue.

    He had the media lined up with kneepads on. If he alienates them he is truly fucked.

  65. 65.

    jake

    September 2, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    Could anyone imagine the outcry if Michelle Obama were a member of a black separatist party?

    Don’t try it, your ears will bleed.

  66. 66.

    Kevin

    September 2, 2008 at 4:09 pm

    Haha, just ran across this:

    Lobbyists for McCain

  67. 67.

    DougJ

    September 2, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    Speaking of religious nuts, I wonder if Palin’s batshit crazy pastor will get the same attention Reverend Wright did:

    During the 2004 election season, he praised President Bush’s performance during a debate with Sen. John Kerry, then offered a not-so-subtle message about his personal candidate preferences. “I’m not going tell you who to vote for, but if you vote for this particular person, I question your salvation. I’m sorry.” Kalnins added: “If every Christian will vote righteously, it would be a landslide every time.”

    Months after hinting at possible damnation for Kerry supporters, Kalnins bristled at the treatment President Bush was receiving over the federal government’s handling of Hurricane Katrina. “I hate criticisms towards the President,” he said, “because it’s like criticisms towards the pastor — it’s almost like, it’s not going to get you anywhere, you know, except for hell. That’s what it’ll get you.”

    Much of his support for the current administration has come in the realm of foreign affairs. Kalnins has preached that the 9/11 attacks and the invasion of Iraq were part of a “world war” over the Christian faith, one in which Jesus Christ had called upon believers to be willing to sacrifice their lives.

  68. 68.

    David Hunt

    September 2, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    The plural of “anecdote” is not “data.”

    True. The data HHS has been able to gather shows it doesn’t work. Of course federally funded AO programs have been rather reluctant to show any data but God forbid we cut off the cash.

    Exactly. I’d meant to follow up with the point that there were ample studies that discredited AOE. I had…trouble getting that comment onto the thread.

  69. 69.

    SGEW

    September 2, 2008 at 5:21 pm

    I wonder if Palin’s batshit crazy pastor will get the same attention Reverend Wright did . . . .

    Of course not!

    One of them is a crazy, pathological, monstrous nutjob who shouldn’t be trusted with scissors, let alone the spiritual well being of his parishioners.

    The other one is black.

    Apples and oranges, my friend. Apples and oranges.

  70. 70.

    Cain

    September 2, 2008 at 5:24 pm

    This site’s db server has started to bog down again. I suspect that there are locking problems. BJ is gaining a lot of referrals from all over the place. John’s getting famous.. :)

    cain

  71. 71.

    Cassidy

    September 2, 2008 at 6:04 pm

    Fuck’em with a sharp pointy stick. If making some sexually ignorant teenager the center of attention for the next 3 months is what it takes to get these evil little shits out of office, then I’m all for it.

  72. 72.

    Dan

    September 2, 2008 at 9:36 pm

    …publicly meeting with the lunatic doctor…
    Bill Frist? ;)

  73. 73.

    grumpy realist

    September 2, 2008 at 10:23 pm

    Considering how the Nat’l Enquirer coyly hints in that article linked above of all sorts of other dirt they’ve dug up (i.e., had people coming up to them and dumping in their laps), I predict a Very Very *Interesting* Week for Palin and McCain–in the Chinese sense of the word, of course.

    Pass the popcorn. I was following the meltdown in Japanese politics but this, this is *epic*.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. My Kids Are Making Me Draw Your Face says:
    September 2, 2008 at 12:07 pm

    […] Really, could I be a bigger hypocrite? Well, probably, but I’d have to become a Christian conservative to pull it off. And I’m only willing to go so far in the name of hypocrisy, dammit. […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • kindness on Before The Trim (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:46pm)
  • BeautifulPlumage on On the Lighter Side (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:44pm)
  • different-church-lady on On the Lighter Side (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:41pm)
  • eversor on On the Lighter Side (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:40pm)
  • twbrandt on On the Lighter Side (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:38pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!