I didn’t see this one coming…the problem with Obama is that he is too much like Bush (via Red State):
Change? That’s what the dumb masses voted for, but they will just get more of the same, if Barack holds true to what he said in his speech today. It will be realized to be, after all, politics as usual. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I didn’t know George W. was a Muslim socialist who faked his birth certificate.
Comrade Dread
I think Obama will be more conventional than his supporters think, but given that he has held office for less than a day, it seems a LITTLE FUCKING EARLY to be projecting what his administration will be like.
4tehlulz
The Wingnuts have committed the most grievous sin possible:
They have become boring.
Punchy
For the 1,632rd time, they just post whatever pisses off liberals the most. That’s their only metric for "quality" jouralmalism. It gets them comments, thus page hits, thus revenue, and it keeps them in this alternate reality
Reverend Dennis
Because if Obama is just like Bush then that means that Bush wasn’t The Worst President Ever.
Your block quoted text may be in the running for "Most Clichés in a Single Blog Post."
DougJ
So they’re entertaining us deliberately. Great. I’ve got no problem with that.
Rock
This isn’t really about Obama — it’s about Bush. They are asserting that Bush was not a real conservative. Which means his failures can be attributed to his liberalism.
Conservatism can never fail, it can only be failed.
MikeJ
I like that bit about the "dumb masses". It’s exactly like when people use the word "sheeple". I know I can ignore this person, although Marc Maron uses it to great comic effect.
DougJ
It’s a lot like communism that way.
NutellaonToast
"The dumb massess" eh? I love how people are either truly and deeply on the side of the conservatives or too stupid too realize what’s good for them, depending on the results of the last election.
cleek
"the dumb masses"
remember folks, liberals are the elitists.
rawshark
I get this a lot in political arguments. When the republicans are doing well they are the bestest party evah!! When they are doing badly or if you manage to actually get the wingnut to acknowledge a fact or two you get there is no difference between republicans and democrats.
It;s like you’re Phil Kessel slicing through the Penguins, moving in on net. You deke Fleury out of his skates, take the shot but just before the puck crosses the line Hal Gill knocks the net off it’s mooring. No goal and the refs won’t hear you explain that nets don’t move on their own.
NonyNony
@Rock:
I love extrapolating that out to what it means for "the Decider’s" eventual ranking on the "worst presidents" scale. As the dead-enders who have been defending him for the last few years start to demonize him for "failing the movement" his chances of history "vindicating" him will slip from "slim" to "none." Good for him.
@DougJ:
What do you expect from a movement whose leadership is made up mainly of a bunch of ex-Trotskyites?
rawshark
Why don’t I have permission to edit my comment?
BDeevDad
Sounds like they watched last night’s Daily Show
John S.
Shut up. That’s why.
TenguPhule
After 8 years of Bush’s dick in their mouth, *now* they decide to bite down.
rawshark
@John S.:
LMAO
gbear
Bush may not have faked his birth certificate, but he might just try to fake a passport before his time is thru.
The Other Steve
I really do hope that Obama fails at being like GW Bush.
Incertus
@BDeevDad: Beat me to it. Those fucks are never original, are they?
Incertus
@TenguPhule: Except they missed and got their own tongues.
jenniebee
They’ve also picked right back up with Michelle where they left off with Hillary in 1999. I won’t link to it, but Ace of Spades and his commentariat are saying "they savaged Laura Bush and Sarah Palin" and using that as an excuse to indulge in rape fantasies about Michelle Obama.
I feel ill.
Faux News
I agree: the wignuts aren’t outrageous or even funny. Now they are merely boring and utterly irrelevant.
From a Darwinian viewpoint they are all a bunch of "useless eaters" and "oxygen thieves".
Cyrus
We’ve been saying all along that he was a Manchurian candidate, but did they listen? Nooooo…
Liberals have always complained about Bush being too close to the house of Saud. I’m sure right-wingers would agree completely* if only there was a way to do so without giving up their unrequited** love for gas-guzzling vehicles of all kinds.
* Between NAFTA and their health care system, some right-wingers aren’t happy about our government having good relations with Canada. A predominantly Arab, predominantly Muslim country that produced the leader of Al Qaeda and three-quarters of the 9/11 hijackers? If not for recent politics, Saudi Arabia would be a far bigger bête noire than Iran is.
** Hopefully unrequited. You never know.
Cyrus
Stupid formatting. There was supposed to be an asterisk in front of that paragraph that’s all bold, indicating that it’s a footnote to the "would agree completely" part. Oh well. How hard is it to get reliable, predictable blog comments? This isn’t just BJ, half a dozen blogs have sucky commenting systems.
HumboldtBlue
Well, yeah. Bush also wasn’t a legitimate President seeing as though it took Scalia to appoint him, Obama can’t be the legitimate president because he never took the oath! They’re like fucking brothers or somethin’.
brendanm
Bush’s speeches were often surprisingly liberal, in the classical sense ala JFK.
The problem was that his actions typically fell far short of his rhetoric. Obviously we don’t know that Obama will follow through on his promises as President, but his past record as Senator is encouraging, as is his rapid start so far (particularly regarding Gitmo).
Zifnab
@DougJ:
Well, authoritarianism in general.
And yeah, this has nothing to do with Bush and everything to do with "sticking it to the liberals". Yesterday’s Army of Davids become today’s "dumb masses". Yesterday’s racist jabs become today’s bemoaning incivility of speech. They’re looking for an excuse to call liberals stupid and they’ll find it.
And who the fuck cares? It’s not like they’ve been right about anything before. I don’t think they’re going to start now.
Farley
Now that’s strange I can believe in.
They must all suffer from Morgellon’s disease, and receive their information from the tiny print etched on the wee colored threads they pull out of their festering skin.
I’m going to look at the inauguration photos again, to cleanse the palate.
Maus
Seriously? They’ve been trying to dishearten progressives to their level and equivocate since Obama began the "change" message. It’s not surprising, and it’s been a fairly popular concern troll topic online and on both the conservative and mainstream media.
trizzlor
That’s why those that were objective during the campaign recognized that the choices were (ironically) between Bush III (Obama) — despite his rhetoric to the contrary — and Clinton III (McCain).
– From the comments, need I say more?
Neue Internetprasenz
Now that the transition has taken effect, I think we should send a message to the 26%ers that they absolutely do not fucking matter. That would entail a severe curtailment of the needless double-barrel linking in the main post.
sus
Here’s some of the Daily Show where the speeches are compared. This is a clip of lots of shows… but scoot it up to about 1:20 mark.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuXIx76mIFc
Stewart!
sus
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuXIx76mIFc
scoot to 1:20 mark.
Or… is this not posting?
sus
I guess I can’t post a link here. Anyway… Stewart compared Obama’s speech to some of bushes. Same rhetoric. But… that’s politics. Since I can’t post link, Youtube has a clip of late show comics titled: Making Fun Of The Barack Obama Inauguration Speech
scoot up to the 1:20 mark to see the Daily Show bit.
Stewart is too much. love him.
Delia
I was sadly unable to reach the RedState StrikeForce site, but my hometown paper forced me to read Doughy Pantload this morning. He seems to have gotten the "say something nice about Obama" memo.
Here’s some of what he came up with:
Moral: if you’re forced to find something nice to say about someone you don’t like, be sure to stick it to someone else while you’re at it.
The Silent Fiddle of Nero
But he had that whole Messiah and Unity thing going. Didn’t he get caught on camera kissing and holding hands with a Saudi?
David Hunt
Well he is a Christian-in-name-only frat-boy who had daddy fake his military records. So he’s actually not too far off from a wingnut stereotype of Barack Obama afterall…
Bubblegum Tate
Blogs for Victory has been beating that dead horse for a while. "OMG–Obama took money from political donors! That’s not change we can believe in! OMG, Obama is surrounding himself with members of his own party–that’s not change at all!" And so on.
It’s pretty stupid on its face…what makes it funny is that they seriously believe that they are seriously making very serious points about serious issues. Seriously.
Comrade Kevin
@trizzlor:
So, for whom did that tool vote?
Faux News
Herr Doktor Ron Paul probably.
Shinobi
DId you guys see the list of things that republicans are supposed to not do now that they are out of power?
The corresponding list for democrats is much shorter:
DON’T fuck everything up.
The Moar You Know
@jenniebee: Are you tellin me that Ace of Spades and Paul L. are the same person? God, it all makes a lot more sense now.
Bubblegum Tate
BTW, have you all remembered to thank Bush?
As far as I can tell, that site is not a spoof, either.
Sirkowski
Conservatives are now looking to the Daily Show for their talking points.
Paul
My leftist friend has made this exact same complaint, in earnest: Obama is too much like his predecessor:
"He’s Gorbachev. Too little, too late. You do not get out of problems with the same thinking which got you into them, and you will not like "our Putin."
Obama intends to continue Bush’s programs– but to do them better!
That… is not an improvement.
You all hated Bush. You will come to hate what Obama does. That he can spin what he does with some measure of charisma is not an improvement (or a change)."
A Finer World Blog
Ryan
Why are you blaming Conservatives? Jon Stewart came up with this. The Daily Show was never in the Bush camp. Ever.
Are you in such denial that you won’t even consider why this clip pisses you off? I think the punchline is ironic because it isn’t a joke: "I guess when Obama says this stuff, I don’t think he really means it. And that gives me hope."
Do you disagree with what Obama said when he took office? Do you really hope he didn’t mean it? If you don’t believe what the new President says he believes in, say it. Tell him he’s wrong. Or say that you hope he was telling a little white lie to appeal to the centrists.
But don’t dodge the issue. Go on record and say what you believe, not how pissed you are that righties are gloating.