• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Cancel the cowardly Times and Post and set up an equivalent monthly donation to ProPublica.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Disappointing to see gov. newsom with his finger to the wind.

Hey hey, RFK, how many kids did you kill today?

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” was supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Hot air and ill-informed banter

We are aware of all internet traditions.

The republican speaker is a slippery little devil.

One way or another, he’s a liar.

Shut up, hissy kitty!

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

The desire to stay informed is directly at odds with the need to not be constantly enraged.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

Let me file that under fuck it.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

DeSantis transforming Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / How Bad Are Things For Jane Harman?

How Bad Are Things For Jane Harman?

by John Cole|  April 29, 20093:24 pm| 68 Comments

This post is in: Clown Shoes, Democratic Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

She believes that hiring Lanny Davis as a spokesperson is a step in the right direction:

Rep. Jane Harman has hired lawyer Lanny Davis, a former special counsel to President Bill Clinton during the Lewinsky affair, as a media advisor, The Cable has learned.

The enlisting of the heavyweight help is the latest sign that the California Democrat intends to push back hard against what she sees as an attempt by current and former national security officials to damage her reputation by providing alleged excerpts from transcripts of her surveilled phone conversations to the press. In the end, Harman may be able to make a public case that she was the victim of an abuse of power, including by the decision of Porter Goss, a former fellow House intelligence committee member turned director of central intelligence, to authorize a wiretap of her. She may also argue that the leaks of the alleged wiretap excerpts constitute a criminal act that merits prosecution.

After what I saw during the last primary election, I am fully convinced that if Lanny Davis was your lawyer, you would get the death penalty for jay-walking. Harman is so screwed.

(via Ben Smith)

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « What really matters about the Specter switch
Next Post: Shorter Byron York »

Reader Interactions

68Comments

  1. 1.

    SGEW

    April 29, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    Wait ’till she hires Mark Penn.

  2. 2.

    Zifnab

    April 29, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    Comeupance, bitches!

  3. 3.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    April 29, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    by providing alleged excerpts from transcripts of her surveilled phone conversations to the press

    Alleged excerpts, that’s a good one. They can be one or the other but not both, methinks.

  4. 4.

    Goggles Pisano

    April 29, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    Perfect, people who leak information should be prosecuted but those who approve, justify and commit torture should not. Man is our world broken.

  5. 5.

    Tom65

    April 29, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    @SGEW: Win

    For the trifecta, she could hire Terry McAuliffe

  6. 6.

    SGEW

    April 29, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    @Tom65: But I kinda liked Terry. When he was drunk.

  7. 7.

    Doodoobutt

    April 29, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    I am one of her constituents, and I want this bitch and DiFi sent packing. I am tired of DINOs in California. Especially in California. If we’re going to get tarred and feathered for being underminers of “real ‘Mericun values” anyway, we may as well walk the walk and get that vital center moved left some.

  8. 8.

    Mr. Stuck

    April 29, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    The last time I checked Davis was busy trying to screw union members out of the open ballot law.

    The enlisting of the heavyweight help is the latest sign that the California Democrat intends to push back hard against what she sees as an attempt by current and former national security officials to damage her reputation

    It’s the “they’re all out to get me” defense. Maybe she should hire Martha Stewart for decorating tips and reputation CPR.

  9. 9.

    gex

    April 29, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    @Tom65: Well, we might as well call in Shrum too.

  10. 10.

    Mr Furious

    April 29, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Well that clinches it. As if I already didn’t want Harmon to go down in flames…

  11. 11.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    blunk drogging:

    Yes, I am drunk. It’s a beautiful day and repubes are suffering an oh so long, tedious and painful death. What’s not to party about?

  12. 12.

    NonyNony

    April 29, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    Alleged excerpts, that’s a good one. They can be one or the other but not both, methinks.

    In her NPR interview, Harman was contending that the excerpts that had been leaked were not real, hence the “alleged excerpts” would really mean “excerpts from the alleged transcript”.

    (Actually my summary goes too far – Harman wasn’t really contending anything, she was spouting stuff and letting people fill in the blanks about what her contention was. She refused to say whether the conversation really happened and insisted that she wanted to see the transcripts for herself to see what was supposedly said. Very weaselly – like she knew she had the conversation, but wanted to leave an impression that she was disputing that the conversation ever occurred.)

  13. 13.

    aimai

    April 29, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    No no, the trifecta is Lanny Davis, Mark Penn, and Bob Schrum. Just typing their names gave me a spasm.

    aimai

  14. 14.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    And, oh yeah, Harman will just have to take her lumps, poor darling.

  15. 15.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    PS – internet dating is so weird, you have no idea

  16. 16.

    Library Grape

    April 29, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    echoing my comment in the last thread, it’s hard for me to think of someone i hate more than Lanny Davis

  17. 17.

    asiangrrlMN

    April 29, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    Karma, it is the bitch, yes, Jane? I have no sympathy, alleged or otherwise, for her.

  18. 18.

    Joshua Norton

    April 29, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    Harman has always been a “just hold your nose and pull the lever for her” type of Dem. She started giving me the creeps when she was running in the Dem primary against Gray Davis for Governor of California. Apparently other people got the same vibe. She was ahead in the polls and predicted to be a shoo-in for quite a while — then suddenly helloooo Governor Davis.

    I think she’ll be gone within the next few election cycles.

  19. 19.

    Zifnab

    April 29, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    @harlana pepper: I once spent three months corresponding with a girl named “LovesBigCans6409”, but when we finally meet it turned out she was a goat.

    True story.

  20. 20.

    KG

    April 29, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    I had this idea, a couple years back, to start a PAC dedicated to defeating every incumbent in the next election. 435 new members of the House, 33 new Senators at the national level. The chaos would just be a happy byproduct of clearing out the deadwood corrupt bastards that we get to deal with these days.

    Stories like this make me want to do it, that much more.

  21. 21.

    omen

    April 29, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Mr. Stuck:

    The last time I checked Davis was busy trying to screw union members out of the open ballot law.

    i was going to raise that too. how unsurprising from a clintonista.

  22. 22.

    JK

    April 29, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    Jane Harman also plans to hire Howard Wolfson

  23. 23.

    LD50

    April 29, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    Jane Harman also plans to hire Howard Wolfson and Geraldine Ferraro

    I can only conclude that all the competent Democrats are all already working in some capacity for the Obama administration.

  24. 24.

    Cat Lady

    April 29, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    OT, but we’re all going to die from H1N1, WHO tells me.

    You’re welcome.

  25. 25.

    gbear

    April 29, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    OT. This may be hard to believe, but Michelle Bachman says something very stupid in regard to the hate-crimes bill.

    If only we could convert her stupid into energy or debt retirement…

  26. 26.

    JK

    April 29, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    @Cat Lady: It’s the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eyFiClAzq8

  27. 27.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    Zifnab: I’m “all ears”

    I just got done responding to a telephone “questionnaire” by a guy and when he asked what my political affiliation was, he conveniently got a call from his son’s teacher and had to hang up.

    He left me a message later saying we were incompatible. Hee.

  28. 28.

    TenguPhule

    April 29, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    After what I saw during the last primary election, I am fully convinced that if Lanny Davis was your lawyer, you would get the death penalty for jay-walking.

    How do we convince Dick Cheney, G BUsh and Karl Rove to hire him?

  29. 29.

    chrome agnomen

    April 29, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    “i say to the H1N1, ‘bring it on!'”

  30. 30.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    gbear: I switched over to CSPAN last night and Michelle Bachmann was speaking and, no lie, my tortie immediately vomited up the entire contents of her stomach.

  31. 31.

    TenguPhule

    April 29, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    OT. This may be hard to believe, but Michelle Bachman says something very stupid in regard to the hate-crimes bill.

    No, if she’d something intelligent and related to the actual workings of the bill, that would be hard to believe.

  32. 32.

    JK

    April 29, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @gbear: Is there a parallel universe where Michele Bachmann makes statements that are neither stupid nor insane?

  33. 33.

    Ed Marshall

    April 29, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    It’s not about Lanny per se. Lanny is representing the Israel Project at least, and because they work hand in glove by extension, AIPAC. It’s about who is behind Lanny Davis.

  34. 34.

    chrome agnomen

    April 29, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    hey, zifnab, you fooling around with halperin’s goat?

  35. 35.

    JGabriel

    April 29, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    Why all the hate on Lanny Davis? It’s not as if …

    Never mind. Carry on.

    .

  36. 36.

    LanceThruster

    April 29, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    I think this a great piece: Jane’s Harman Us by Becky Akers

    [excerpt] Her riches haven’t kept her from leeching off taxpayers near Los Angeles for seven terms, though they may explain why she pegs herself as “the best Republican in the Democratic Party.”

  37. 37.

    Corner Stone

    April 29, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @Zifnab:

    but when we finally meet it turned out she was a goat.

    Methinks harlana pepper’s not the only one schnozzled round here.

  38. 38.

    Laura W Darling

    April 29, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @harlana pepper: We really should take this to the Open Thread, you know. I’ll pour some wine a bit early and we can dish.

    I tried e-Harmony (ugh) a while back and wrote in the “Other things you should know about me space”: “I am very liberal and very pro-Obama. If this is an issue, best be aware of it now.”
    A very effective culling, herd-thinning device, to say the least. I used to chuckle at the “close match” reasons the men gave that indicated this might be their key “issue” with me. Sometimes I’d go read their profiles just to confirm. Good times.

  39. 39.

    gbear

    April 29, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @JK:

    Is there a parallel universe where Michele Bachmann makes statements that are neither stupid nor insane?

    The northwestern portion of her district (I still want to give Stillwater and the St. Croix valley area the benefit of the doubt).

  40. 40.

    Halteclere

    April 29, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @harlana pepper:

    PS – internet dating is so weird, you have no idea

    I do have any idea – it’s how I met my wife. Who, surprisingly, in a city of 6 million people lived 0.6 miles away at the time.

  41. 41.

    demkat620

    April 29, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    Well, the flu’s gonna kill us all next week anyway so, good luck with that hire Jane.

  42. 42.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    Laura W: Good times, indeed! The wonders of modern technology! I guess I must be pretty “evolved” by now b/c such things used to piss me off, but now it just makes me laugh. Or maybe it’s just the fact that republicans are so fucked that just tickles me. Honest-to-god, I felt like I was interviewing for a job.

  43. 43.

    JK

    April 29, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    @gbear: Bachmann and Palin need to cleanse their doors of perception by pulling their heads out of their respective asses

  44. 44.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    Halteclare: Success!! Yay!

  45. 45.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    I hereby request an Open Thread on internet dating! If we can have threads on sports, I see no reason why we cannot have threads on internet dating stories!! :)

  46. 46.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    I sincerely hope everyone is impressed by the fact that I can still spell while drunk. How’s that for criteria?

  47. 47.

    R-Jud

    April 29, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    @harlana pepper:

    internet dating is so weird, you have no idea

    Sure I do: I married the guy I met through comments on my friend’s blog.

  48. 48.

    gbear

    April 29, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @harlana pepper:

    My experience is that all of the good ones are in cities that you wouldn’t want to live in even if you were paid to do so (and just TRY to get anyone to think about moving north to MN).

  49. 49.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    R-Jud: awesome, apparently, it does work some times, sounds like a good new thread to me, hint, hint, John. :)

  50. 50.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Oh, and just to be not totally OT, my ex-bf’s ex-wife reminds me a lot of Michelle Bachmann. From what I know of her, it makes sense.

  51. 51.

    demkat620

    April 29, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    @gbear: Yeah, how about that Hoot-Smalley Act.

    She is so stupid.

  52. 52.

    Laura W Darling

    April 29, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    @R-Jud: That makes me very happy. For you two (Bean & kitties), and for serendipity and the magic of the intertubes!

  53. 53.

    Corner Stone

    April 29, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    @harlana pepper:

    I sincerely hope everyone is impressed by the fact that I can still spell while drunk. How’s that for criteria?

    I’m just gonna throw a SWAG out there and say that at any givent point in time there is a larger percentage of commenters commenting here drunk then there are self identified Republicans in the recent polling.
    Or am I projecting?

  54. 54.

    bago

    April 29, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    History begins to judge George. Spoiler alert: It ain’t pretty.

  55. 55.

    Halteclere

    April 29, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    Back in 2005 when I met my wife I was on Match.com. I couldn’t stand eHarmony (got pissed off at the format before completing the profile setup), and had tried some other sites.

    I could write a long post providing words of wisdom learned from my internet dating experiences. For example:

    Men: Spend an evening looking at other guy’s profiles to figure out how to differentiate yourself from the crowd (research the competition). Post lots of pictures of yourself doing various things (no pictures of you without a shirt, though). Write more than a couple lines about yourself – i.e. be different than all the other guys. When writing a woman ask specific things in a creative way about her from her profile to show that you are paying attention.

    Women: Also post several pictures of yourself doing various things. DON’T post any glamor shots! Provide conversation openings in your profile that gives a guy a topic to start a creative conversation from – i.e. “I like to travel” sucks, whereas “This one time I got lost in the subways of Paris …” almost begs for a great response.

    Ah, those were the times. I’m so glad I’m married.

  56. 56.

    binzinerator

    April 29, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    @gbear:

    If only we could convert her stupid into energy or debt retirement…

    Not a good idea. The planet would go supernova and explode into one of the most powerful quasars in the galaxy.

    Or we’d experience crushing massive hyperinflation as we all discovered we could each build our own personal Scrooge McDuck money bin to swim in.

  57. 57.

    omen

    April 29, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    @bago:

    History begins to judge George. Spoiler alert: It ain’t pretty.

    but if he had more black support, he’d be more popular.

  58. 58.

    Laura W Darling

    April 29, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    @Halteclere: Oh what a turbulent history I had with match.com. No good ever came of it. I’m very happy for you!

    (no pictures of you without a shirt, though)

    Immediate, absolute disqualifier. I don’t care what else the profile has in it, or how buff the man is, this is just tacky as all shit.

    Other immediate disqualifier, (aside from men who can’t spell, punctuate or write, or who abuse emoticons and LOL LOL LOL!!) — men who refer to themselves with lower case “i”.
    WARNING WARNING!

  59. 59.

    harlana pepper

    April 29, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Laura W: aahh yes, the shirtless pics! classy stuff

    did you ever search females just to check out your competition?

    (i did match a few years ago, jfyi)

  60. 60.

    SGEW

    April 29, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    I would join in this discussion of internet dating, but I have already declared that my time for sharing too much is over for the day, when we were discussing exercise tips on the last open thread.

    Probably for the best, to be honest.

  61. 61.

    Laura W Darling

    April 29, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    @harlana pepper: A few times I looked at women — I normally didn’t do that because, well, I’m not them and they are not me and I always figure that all you can do is put out there what you really are and see who resonates. My profiles were very “atypical”, I’ll say that much.

    When I looked at women it was not so much in terms of sizing up competition, since I never viewed online dating as a sport or a contest — more as an experiment with magnets, if you will — but more out of plain curiosity about who is out there looking? You made me remember one time I read a woman’s profile that blew me away. She was so obviously together and interesting, I emailed her and told her so. Also telling her I wasn’t trying to ghey in or her or anything, but just wanted her to know how much I appreciated the way she expressed and portrayed herself. A really classy profile and a very interesting woman. Never heard back from her. Sigh.

    So I guess we’ll just have to keep queering Jane Harman’s thread with our online dating horror stories, huh?

  62. 62.

    Laura W Darling

    April 29, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    @SGEW: Ah c’mon! All I remember about your imagined TMI is that you are thin and buff.
    See? Selective memory is in the mind of the reader!

  63. 63.

    SGEW

    April 29, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    @Laura W Darling: If I share any more, this site will have become internet dating, fer cryin’ out loud.

    Shouldn’t we be talking about Jane Harman? Or, failing that, dating her on the internet?

  64. 64.

    ricky

    April 29, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    SGEW, if you scroll up to your first post and reread it you will realize you already said it all.

  65. 65.

    SGEW

    April 29, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    @ricky: Eh? Do you mean me enjoying Terry McAuliffe’s performance on tv during the campaign, when he appeared to be rip-roaring drunk? Not caring a whit that his p.r. nonsense was, indeed, nonsensical, unintentionally (or intentionally? ho ho!) giving the lie to the whole enterprise, with his tussled hair, and that devilish gleam in his eye, and . . .

    um . . .

    [goes and does other things]

  66. 66.

    HumboldtBlue

    April 29, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    John Amato announced at C&L that he’s going to challenge Harman for her seat. If those tabs above actually worked I’d link, but fuck it, I tried like 30 times and failed, so go to Crooks and Liars and see for yourself.

  67. 67.

    Chris

    April 29, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    Lanny Davis is described as “heavyweight help”? Really?

  68. 68.

    Pbrown

    April 30, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    Did she not watch the election and his complete melt down when Hillary didn’t win the nomination? He was more devastated than Hillary or Bill. Lanny Davis in nothing but an incompetent has been Period. And it clearly shows her poor judgment in picking this man as her spoke person and something the Democratic Party should really pay attention to.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road -  ?BillinGlendaleCA - Gold! 1
Image by BillinGlendaleCA (5/14/25)

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Late Night Open Thread: Made Men (May 15, 2025 @ 5:02am)
  • David_C on Wednesday Night Open Thread (May 15, 2025 @ 4:41am)
  • David_C on Wednesday Night Open Thread (May 15, 2025 @ 4:38am)
  • Sally on Late Night Open Thread: Made Men (May 15, 2025 @ 4:23am)
  • sab on Late Night Open Thread: Made Men (May 15, 2025 @ 4:17am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!