• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

When we show up, we win.

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

If America since Jan 2025 hasn’t broken your heart, you haven’t loved her enough.

Books are my comfort food!

People are weird.

Dear elected officials: Trump is temporary, dishonor is forever.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the gop

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Do we throw up our hands or do we roll up our sleeves? (hint, door #2)

Their boy Ron is an empty plastic cup that will never know pudding.

People identifying as christian while ignoring christ and his teachings is a strange thing indeed.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Republicans: “Abortion is murder but you can take a bus to get one.” Easy peasy.

The unpunished coup was a training exercise.

Consistently wrong since 2002

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / It’s all Latin to me

It’s all Latin to me

by DougJ|  May 29, 200910:38 am| 116 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

One wonders if Fred Barnes was really Morton Kondrake’s longtime companion.

BARNES: I think you can make the case that she’s one of those who has benefited from affirmative action over the years tremendously.

BENNETT: Yeah, well, maybe so. Did she get into Princeton on affirmative action, one wonders.

BARNES: One wonders.

BENNETT: Summa Cum Laude, I don’t think you get on affirmative action. I don’t know what her major was, but Summa Cum Laude’s a pretty big deal.

BARNES: I guess it is, but you know, there’s some schools and maybe Princeton’s not one of them, where if you don’t get Summa Cum Laude then or some kind of Cum Laude, you then, you’re a D+ student.

This is a perfect example of conservatives’ tortured relation with higher education. Everyone smart went to Princeton or some such, but even so, those schools are filled with A-giving pinkos.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Unpure of Heart and Weak in the Knees
Next Post: Israel and the Settlements »

Reader Interactions

116Comments

  1. 1.

    Woodrowfan

    May 29, 2009 at 10:43 am

    So basically Fred is saying that since she’s not white, she couldn’t POSSIBLY have earned good grades on the basis of brains and hard work. And repuks wonder why we keeping calling them racists…

  2. 2.

    GambitRF

    May 29, 2009 at 10:46 am

    “One wonders.”

    Yes, one complete dumbass named Fred Barnes wonders.

  3. 3.

    Napoleon

    May 29, 2009 at 10:47 am

    @Woodrowfan:

    Yep, the underlying assumption to what he said is that Sonia could not possibly be smart enough to have done it herself because she is a PR.

  4. 4.

    Zandar

    May 29, 2009 at 10:47 am

    Asian and Indian descent, smart as a whip, hard workers, proved themselves.

    African and Hispanic descent, only got there to due affirmative action.

    Gotta love selective minority racism.

  5. 5.

    kid bitzer

    May 29, 2009 at 10:48 am

    this is so fucking ignorant that it hurts.

    i hope that shirley tilghman comes down on him like a ton of bricks.

    the basic shape of the ignorance is this:

    yes, it is true that princeton graduates a small percentage of fairly dim bulbs, and that they are affirmative action cases.

    except that “affirmative action” in this case is called “legacy”, and it means “white boys from old princeton families that donate a lot.”
    old money families crank out dullards sometimes–just look at the bushes. nepotism breeds mediocrity–just look at the villagers.

    but although the bottom of the graduating class can be unimpressive, there is absolutely *no truth* to the claim that summas are handed out like candy. this is just complete ignorance.

    and strangely enough, this particular ignorance never showed its head when it was sam alito being considered. it’s only when a woman or a minority is under consideration that all of a sudden credentials don’t mean what they do for the white boys.

    god i hate the villagers.

  6. 6.

    Michael

    May 29, 2009 at 10:48 am

    Ah, I remember all those “fair and balanced” Fox discussions. You’d have a panel that included Fred Barnes, Cal Thomas and 2 or 3 other right wing guys, and Mort was allegedly the countervoice.

    Fred would talk about evil treasonous liberals who were deliberately destroying America while Mort disagreed, Mort’s position being that the liberals were destroying America by negligence, not design.

  7. 7.

    PaulW

    May 29, 2009 at 10:49 am

    I gotta ask where the f0ck did these morans get their college degrees? Oh, that’s right: half these bastards didn’t even finish F0CKING HIGH SCHOOL.

  8. 8.

    SGEW

    May 29, 2009 at 10:49 am

    More to the point, you don’t win the M. Taylor Pyne Honor Prize at Princeton, the “highest academic distinction conferred on an undergraduate,” based on affirmative action.

    They give out two a year.

  9. 9.

    Michael

    May 29, 2009 at 10:51 am

    Yes, one complete dumbass named Fred Barnes wonders.

    Fred inspires people to figure out how to track him just so they can punch him in the face repeatedly.

  10. 10.

    Jim

    May 29, 2009 at 10:52 am

    I just checked the website of my third-tier alma mater. 3.5/4.0. is the minimum for cum laude. I don’t suppose anyone is going to ask Fred where these schools are, or… is.

    (So I’m not the only one whose gaydar was set off by Fred and Mort?)

  11. 11.

    Walker

    May 29, 2009 at 10:52 am

    She also got the Moses Taylor Pyne Prize, the highest general award given to an undergraduate at Princeton.

    Barnes is assuming that because she is Latino, she could not possibly have made it though on her on merits. Despite the fact that her achievements have shown otherwise. This is a textbook example of racism, clear and simple.

    EDIT: I see SGEW got here first.

  12. 12.

    Cat Lady

    May 29, 2009 at 10:53 am

    @SGEW:

    [hands over ears] la la de la la la what can’t hear you la la la de la la la

    /fred barnes

  13. 13.

    John D.

    May 29, 2009 at 10:55 am

    …

    I love how these idiots muse about this, without bothering to check with, I don’t know, Princeton?

    They awarded her the Pyne Prize — the HIGHEST academic honor for an undergraduate — in that same year. Sure her summa cum laude was a grade inflation result. Sure.

    I’m gonna go with Fred Barnes is a fucking racist idiot. For $1000, Alex.

  14. 14.

    camchuck

    May 29, 2009 at 10:55 am

    Unless Sotomayor can’t answer “What books and magazines do you read?” without tripping on herself, the Republicans can STFU.

  15. 15.

    Da Bomb

    May 29, 2009 at 10:57 am

    I can recall several incidences where I was considered an “affirmative action” pick or that my white counterparts got accepted into a college based on hard work and merit. I always felt like I had to work harder to prove myself.

    But no matter how hard I work, you have people like Barnes who completely discredit any accomplishment as a supposed “handout”. It disgusts and disappoints me.

  16. 16.

    MattF

    May 29, 2009 at 10:57 am

    This is just garden-variety bigotry. And they’re not really bothering to disguise it.

  17. 17.

    Little Dreamer

    May 29, 2009 at 11:00 am

    Barnes obviously doesn’t know what the Summa in Summa Cum Laude means. Here’s a hint Barnes, “there can be only one”.

  18. 18.

    Walker

    May 29, 2009 at 11:05 am

    By the way at most Ivies, Summa Cum Laude is engineered to account for grade inflation. At my alma mater (Dartmouth), summa was defined as the GPA threshold of 5% of the class from the previous year (or a minimal GPA floor of 3.85, whichever is higher). So it goes up as grades do.

  19. 19.

    SLKRR

    May 29, 2009 at 11:05 am

    I guess it is, but you know, there’s some schools and maybe Princeton’s not one of them, where if you don’t get Summa Cum Laude then or some kind of Cum Laude, you then, you’re a D+ student.

    Name one school like this, Fred. Just one.

    What a racist piece of shit.

  20. 20.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    May 29, 2009 at 11:07 am

    Shorter Fred Barnes:
    “Romanes eunt domus – that’s Latin for Latinas go home.”

  21. 21.

    Tim H.

    May 29, 2009 at 11:12 am

    Dude, right now this is all performance art for the base. No actual elections, so they can be as crazy as they like.

  22. 22.

    SGEW

    May 29, 2009 at 11:12 am

    As a side note, I have to complain about something:

    Where was all of my affirmative action preferential treatment, god damn it?! Yale and Harvard Law put me on their stupid waiting lists, despite my extremely interesting ethnic heritage, and I had to go to a demi-second tier school instead[1]. And I’ll still be neck deep in debt for the rest of my natural life – where are my preferential grants and scholarships solely for my “colorful” personal background?

    Obviously, I simply am not “colorful” enough. If only I had grown up in the South Bronx in a housing project! Then it would have been pure easy street.

    [1] First tier journal tho’, fer what that’s worth.

  23. 23.

    West of the Cascades

    May 29, 2009 at 11:14 am

    Besides being a totally racist piece of shit, he’s also wrong on the facts. I went to Princeton, was a solid B+ student (3.3), and didn’t get any honors (to get just “cum laude” you needed about a 3.5, and I wasn’t smart enough). Ignoring that she shared the Pyne Prize, which signifies precisely that she was one of the two most intelligent people to graduate from Princeton in her class, makes it clear that what’s motivating this is pure, unadulterated racism of a kind that we haven’t seen since, I guess, the debate over immigration reform.

  24. 24.

    Mnemosyne

    May 29, 2009 at 11:15 am

    @kid bitzer:

    and strangely enough, this particular ignorance never showed its head when it was sam alito being considered. it’s only when a woman or a minority is under consideration that all of a sudden credentials don’t mean what they do for the white boys.

    Sam Alito graduates respectably, but not cum laude, from Princeton and is an editor at the Yale Law Journal, which proves he’s amply qualified for the Supreme Court.

    Sonia Sotomayor graduates summa cum laude, wins a major undergraduate award, and is also an editor at the Yale Law Journal, but she’s clearly unqualified.

    Funny how that works, innit?

  25. 25.

    Brachiator

    May 29, 2009 at 11:15 am

    I guess it is, but you know, there’s some schools and maybe Princeton’s not one of them, where if you don’t get Summa Cum Laude then or some kind of Cum Laude, you then, you’re a D+ student.

    Maybe Princeton’s not one of them? Jesus H. Christ. These people can’t help themselves.

    It’s amazing how these clods manage to suppress their racism when a nominee is Republican (e.g., Condi Rice or Alberto Gonzales), but they just can’t help themselves when a nomination is made by a Democrat.

  26. 26.

    InflatableCommenter

    May 29, 2009 at 11:18 am

    So our daily quest to find the dumbest-assed thing on the bandwidth for the day is over for Friday.

    Good work.

  27. 27.

    jibeaux

    May 29, 2009 at 11:19 am

    Did Crittencritter just link to this post as a way to turn the snark from a completely different post into an Espantapajaros? (That would be a Latina scarecrow) I think he did.

  28. 28.

    cleek

    May 29, 2009 at 11:20 am

    @Jules Crittenden » Compelling BS Line:

    looks like someone’s trolling for a link-back. or is there another reason Crittenden linked here with nothing more than a sentence fragment ?

  29. 29.

    jibeaux

    May 29, 2009 at 11:22 am

    While I’m on Crittencritter, is it kind of sad that the blog of an editor of a large newspaper gets fewer comments than my blog, which is about cute things that my kids do? I’m inclined to think so.

  30. 30.

    matoko_chan

    May 29, 2009 at 11:23 am

    Well ekshually this just proves neither Barnes or Bennett ever attended grad school.
    A “C” in grad school is a fail.

  31. 31.

    jibeaux

    May 29, 2009 at 11:25 am

    Ah, and cleek astutely finds the missing link between my first and second comments.

  32. 32.

    anonevent

    May 29, 2009 at 11:26 am

    @Jules Crittenden » Compelling BS Line: (I’m not about to create an account on Jules’s website to respond) Engaging in straw man attacks won’t help – I don’t see anyone here complaining about state school – especially since I happen to be going to a state school to work on my PhD. In Doctorate parlance, Jules, go suck it.

  33. 33.

    Comrade Dread

    May 29, 2009 at 11:30 am

    Psst… Republicans… it’s rather hard to convince me we live in a post-racial world when you can look at a long list of impressive accomplishments that had to be earned and still write them off as a undeserved government handout.

  34. 34.

    Sarcastro

    May 29, 2009 at 11:30 am

    “I know lots of stupid people who went to Ivy League schools,” said Rove.

    “Hell” he continued, “I got one of them elected President. Twice!”

  35. 35.

    John Cole

    May 29, 2009 at 11:30 am

    Just ignore him. He’s just trolling for a reaction.

  36. 36.

    Pasquinade

    May 29, 2009 at 11:45 am

    Bush and Yale

    From what is known about Bush’s academic performance at Andover, it is doubtful that he would have been admitted to Yale unless his father (at the time a Texas businessman running for the U.S. Senate in a race he eventually lost) and grandfather (Prescott Bush, a former Republican U.S. senator who represented Connecticut from 1952 to 1962) had been Yalies

    Other than being a legacy, Bush had no qualities that would have gotten him into Yale….he was a mediocre student — he never made the honor roll — and demonstrated no particularly outstanding talents to warrant being admitted to Yale. He was head cheerleader during his senior year, organized the school’s stickball league

    It probably didn’t hurt that three of the seven members of Yale’s admissions committee who reviewed Bush’s application had been in Skull and Bones, the exclusive college club that also included W.’s grandfather and father among its members

    Bush’s Yale transcript shows that he was a C student. He got particularly poor grades in political science and economics. In his freshman year — the only year for which The New Yorker obtained rankings — Bush was in the 21st percentile of his class. In other words, 79 percent of the students had better grades than he did.

    It isn’t clear if the business school’s forms asked if applicants had ever been arrested. But if so, Bush’s application might have stood out — for the wrong reasons. He was not arrested for protesting for civil rights or against the Vietnam War. Rather, as a 20-year-old Yale junior, Bush was arrested for stealing a wreath from a New Haven hotel.

    http://www.prospect.org/webfeatures/2003/01/dreier-p-01-27.html

  37. 37.

    jibeaux

    May 29, 2009 at 11:45 am

    @John Cole:

    Maybe I could give him some pointers about generating interest in your blog. I mean, if I get more interest without trolling or blogwhoring, I must be doing something right, right?
    Jules, if you don’t have kids or don’t have cute kids, I’d probably go the John Cole route and throw some puppies up there. People like puppies. Also kittens. Baby goats, even, are ridiculously cute. You could also make sure that all of your friends and immediate family are aware of your blog, and ask them to chime in sometimes. And don’t neglect the possibility of just buying a little publicity, there’s no shame in that. Ann Coulter advertises on this very blog all the time and I don’t think anyone would ever consider her shameful. You’re welcome!

  38. 38.

    cleek

    May 29, 2009 at 11:48 am

    Baby goats, even, are ridiculously cute.

    and delicious too!

    and now i lament the compassionate carnivore’s dilemma.

  39. 39.

    kay

    May 29, 2009 at 11:48 am

    @West of the Cascades:

    I’m glad you brought up immigration reform; debate over.

    Was I the only person in the country who noticed the huge mass of people who took to the streets for a peaceful march in opposition the last time Republicans tried the “bash all Hispanics” line as a political tactic, to rile up the base?

    The numbers put the tea parties to shame.

    Hispanics and others did that. They showed up. Masses of people. I can assume they can mobilize again, because that thing went off without a hitch. If I were a Republican, using sly language and mean-spirited slurs to rile up the dwindling base, I’d remember who showed up in numbers last time for this fight, and who didn’t, and how that worked out for them last time, in terms of elections.

    I’d suggest they stick to the record, this time, rather than speculating on affirmative action, and who contributes what to this country.

  40. 40.

    Cris

    May 29, 2009 at 11:49 am

    BENNETT: Yeah, well, maybe so. Did she get into Princeton on affirmative action, one wonders.
    BARNES: One wonders.

    Is it irresponsible to speculate? It would be irresponsible not to.

  41. 41.

    jibeaux

    May 29, 2009 at 11:55 am

    @cleek:

    You would eat this little guy?

  42. 42.

    Cris

    May 29, 2009 at 11:55 am

    @Little Dreamer: Barnes obviously doesn’t know what the Summa in Summa Cum Laude means. Here’s a hint Barnes, “there can be only one”.

    How do you fight such a savage? With heart, faith, and steel.

  43. 43.

    jibeaux

    May 29, 2009 at 11:56 am

    You would eat this little guy, cleek?

  44. 44.

    anonevent

    May 29, 2009 at 11:57 am

    @Cris: Let’s say she actually did get in on affirmative action. She’s exactly the type of result I would would hope to get out of it. Let’s compare her to the results generated when Bush 2 got in on patronage. It’s still a win for her side.

  45. 45.

    AhabTRuler

    May 29, 2009 at 11:57 am

    Baby goats, even, are ridiculously cute

    Now, there is no reason to drag Mickey Kaus into this.

  46. 46.

    eric

    May 29, 2009 at 11:58 am

    from TPM
    Jefferson Morley explains how Judge Sotomayor helped puncture the Vince Foster conspiracy theory bubble.

    you may recall my post from a few days ago about the Clintons and/or Marc Roth….I thought of adding Foster, but nope…..FTW! this will get gooooooooood

    eric

  47. 47.

    Tattoosydney

    May 29, 2009 at 11:59 am

    @jibeaux:

    Maybe I could give him some pointers about generating interest in your blog. I mean, if I get more interest without trolling or blogwhoring, I must be doing something right, right?
    Jules, if you don’t have kids or don’t have cute kids, I’d probably go the John Cole route and throw some puppies up there.

    Honestly – if Cole can put up four videos of his cat sitting on its arse doing bugger all, and still get 400 comments, and have us all on tenterhooks to see if video number five would involve any movement at all, how hard can this blogging crap be?

    (Just joking John. Where’s the picture of my dog, dammit? Dog in a turban not Galt enough for you?)

  48. 48.

    Dave S.

    May 29, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    @SGEW: Two prizes a year, eh? One wonders if one of them is affirmative-actiony. /barnes

    It’s like they have this concept of parallel-universe Ivies. One wonders how much time they spend arguing over which one has the faculty with pointy beards.

  49. 49.

    Dennis-SGMM

    May 29, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    @Cris:
    Is it irresponsible to speculate that Bennett and Barnes dildo each other into a coma after every broadcast?

  50. 50.

    Martin

    May 29, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    Ooh! A new potential conspiracy theory! I predict someone will claim that Sotomayor isn’t qualified for the court but is being nominated as payback for helping the Clintons clear up their Vince Foster problem, and that this was part of the deal for Hillary to support Obama.

    Please, oh please, oh please can we get more Vince Foster conspiracy theories out there.

    Damn, Eric beat me to it.

  51. 51.

    eric

    May 29, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    @Martin: now on my wish list: Schiavo and ACORN. :)

  52. 52.

    Cris

    May 29, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    @Dennis-SGMM: Peggy Noonan says no.

  53. 53.

    bago

    May 29, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    To be fair, there was a group of Concerned Alumni of Princeton that fought the admission of any women into the Ivy League school.

    So it’s unfair to tag this as personal sexism when it is really institutional.

    Good thing such a regressive institution has no bearing on today’s Supreme Court.

    Doh!

  54. 54.

    Dennis-SGMM

    May 29, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    @Martin:
    She was also the shooter on the grassy knoll.

  55. 55.

    SGEW

    May 29, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    @eric: What about Bill Ayers?!

    WHERE’S THE “GRINGO” TAPE?!?

  56. 56.

    Martin

    May 29, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    @eric:

    now on my wish list: Schiavo and ACORN.

    I don’t know. I’m now hoping this could be used to show that Obama had access all along to the expert forgers that made Vince Fosters ‘suicide note’ for use in forging his birth certificate. That seems a more productive angle, though it would be nice to get something new rather than more birther bullshit.

  57. 57.

    kay

    May 29, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    @Martin:

    There was a widely believed theory during the primary that HRC promised Rendell’s wife a spot on SCOTUS for his endorsement. The Pennsylvania delegates were sure of it. “Fast Eddy” and all that. The theory continued, post-primary: Obama promised the spot, in return for Rendell’s delivering Pennsylvania.

    But Rendell’s wife isn’t the pick. So much for that.

  58. 58.

    eric

    May 29, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    @SGEW: i think that me and lexis are going to be good friends this weekend lol

  59. 59.

    Xanthippas

    May 29, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    I guess it is, but you know, there’s some schools and maybe Princeton’s not one of them, where if you don’t get Summa Cum Laude then or some kind of Cum Laude, you then, you’re a D+ student.

    Look, I went to freakin’ UT-Arlington and that wasn’t the case even there. I’d sure like to know what schools that moron is talking about.

  60. 60.

    eric

    May 29, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    @kay: I still believe that Barack is gonna nominate for a seat on the Court.

    really. no conspiracy. just think it is a great pick.

    plus, the sideshow of the right going ballistic and fillibustering a former senator…my word…..but that will come after health care is passed.

    eric

  61. 61.

    El Cid

    May 29, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    Also, the “Nobel Prize” in Economics (Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences) is meaningless when Paul Krugman or Amartya Sen win it, but it’s a dignified award when it’s awarded to University of Chicago economists.

    A highly trained and prestigious scientist is a true significant voice of national important when he writes in favor of religious belief on a personal level, but not when a highly trained scientist leading a major institution clearly outlines the role fossil fuel use plays in accelerating the rate of global warming.

  62. 62.

    kay

    May 29, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    @eric:

    I only entertain intra-Party conspiracy theories. I’m really willing to listen to anything anyone comes up with regarding machinations between Clinton and Rendell.

    Republican conspiracy theories regarding Democrats are too ridiculous and crime-scene gory to follow, even for fun. They always go right to “MURDER!” For God’s sake. Get hysterical, why don’t you. It’s not even a good rumor.

  63. 63.

    SGEW

    May 29, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    O/T (but Sotomayor related):

    Bernard Harcourt at Balkinization utterly nails David Frum’s willful misrepresentation of Sotomayor’s background.

    And Glenzilla’s on fire. On fire!

    Man, I love the internet’s ability to nail liars. So satisfying.

  64. 64.

    Martin

    May 29, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    Look, I went to freakin’ UT-Arlington and that wasn’t the case even there. I’d sure like to know what schools that moron is talking about.

    Every school does it differently. Harvard awards latin honors to 50% of their graduating class. Most schools limit to 10%-15%.

    To be honest, ivy league schools are notorious for padding their honor pools and their GPAs. That doesn’t deny the fact that Sonia graduated 2nd in her class, which is no small feat regardless of what honor was bestowed on her.

  65. 65.

    Cris

    May 29, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    @eric: I still believe that Barack is gonna nominate for a seat on the Court.
    really. no conspiracy. just think it is a great pick.

    If there’s no conspiracy, how do you explain the mysterious disappearance of the nominee’s name from your sentence?

  66. 66.

    eric

    May 29, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    @Martin: but her profs padded her grades because they could tell papers because of (1) the salsa stains and (2) she would call her papers “esses”.

    I would rather be homeless than make money being a lying whore like Barnes.

    eric

  67. 67.

    eric

    May 29, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    @Cris: LOL….i dunno….it should be HRC

  68. 68.

    Balconesfault

    May 29, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    Man, I got my BSE in Chem Engineering from Princeton with a 2.9 GPA just a few years after Sotomayor matriculated – I want my Cum Laude!

    It might be the only thing to separate me from the legacy slackers who frat-boy their way through Ivy Schools (or in Princeton’s case, “Eating-club boy”. Really.)

  69. 69.

    binzinerator

    May 29, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    Fucking Barnes. He needs to be slapped in the face with stinging nettles.

    It won’t change his mind but a smarmy fuckstain like Barnes has earned it, with lots to spare.

    This is what I absolutely fucking despise about conservatives. They got this resentment trip they love to ride. They’re so resentful a hispanic woman got something, anything.

    And there they are, sitting around telling themselves a hispanic woman benefitted tremendously from affirmative action over the years, as if they themselves never reaped even more tremendous benefits over those same years for being white and male.

    Ask one just one of these fuckers if they’d switch places — they will get all those so-called tremendous benefits and opportunites supposedly handed out for nothing to brown people and the brown people will get the same breaks white people have to make do with.

    But you know none of these fuckers would ever switch. Because they know just how bad and how often they’d get shit on and shut out by assholes like themselves no matter how smart and capable they proved themselves to be. Deep down inside they know exactly who’s got the better deal.

  70. 70.

    kay

    May 29, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    @eric:

    I would bet HRC has zero interest in that job. It fits with nothing she has pursued previously. Her whole career has been policy, not law. I understand there’s an intersect, but I don’t see it, in her, at all.
    She dropped “lawyer” fairly quickly. There’s nothing wrong with that, in her case it’s great, but that’s what she did.
    She uses the degree, and the experience, but she shows no real interest in the sort of specific immersion that job requires.
    I think she would hate it.

  71. 71.

    SGEW

    May 29, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    @binzinerator:

    Ask one just one of these fuckers if they’d switch places—they will get all those so-called tremendous benefits and opportunites supposedly handed out for nothing to brown people and the brown people will get the same breaks white people have to make do with.

    “There ain’t a White man in this room who’d trade places with me… and I’m rich!” -Chris Rock

  72. 72.

    eric

    May 29, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    @kay: I disagree. Contrary to her affiliations with the Mark Penns of the world, I think she is a believer in social justice, but has been circumscribed initially by her husband’s ambitions, and then her own. I do not think she will wait 7 more years to run for president and i think that her current job will be unsatisying fairly quickly.

    I have never been a big fan of the Clintons and their third way bs, but i think that she is a forceful presence and her political abilities will allow her to put together coalitions on the Court.

    Again, I am not an HRC fan per se, but she would be my first choice. I think all this talk about law profs and appellate court judges misses the point. There is nothing privileged about practicing law as a lawyer or a judge that gives you any special insight into the commerce clause and gun legislation.

    eric

  73. 73.

    kid bitzer

    May 29, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    @68–

    “Ask one just one of these fuckers if they’d switch places”

    cue chris rock.

  74. 74.

    Little Dreamer

    May 29, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    @Pasquinade:

    He got particularly poor grades in political science and economics.

    No shit!

  75. 75.

    kay

    May 29, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    @eric:

    Right. I think she’s a believer is social justice too. It wasn’t a slam at her. I think the supreme court is a really round about way to get to social justice. Crucial, but just one way.

    The justices make the senators look like speed demons. It’s, um, plodding. And 95% of their cases are strictly legal, or even purely procedural, again, there’s a public policy intersect, but it can be really attenuated.

    I think she’d be bored to tears, and, essentially, wasting a lot of her talents.

  76. 76.

    binzinerator

    May 29, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    @Tim H.:

    No actual elections, so they can be as crazy as they like.

    You mean they can be as racist as they really are. It’s not a stunt or a performance. It’s really a display of the motive core of conservatism without the usual attempts to conceal or spin it.

  77. 77.

    Balconesfault

    May 29, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    @Zandar:

    Asian and Indian descent, smart as a whip, hard workers, proved themselves.

    And they can, of course “can turn a television into a watch,” .

  78. 78.

    The Main Gauche of Mild Reason

    May 29, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    @Martin:

    Yeah, he’s talking about Harvard. You’re basically in the lower half of your class if you don’t graduate with honors. ON the other hand, that’s the only school I can think of with latin honors policy like that.

  79. 79.

    Krista

    May 29, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    It’s just phenomenal to watch these people twist themselves in knots. Is it that fucking impossible for them to acknowledge that a woman of Hispanic descent just might have sufficient brainpower to kick ass in school?

    It’s absurd, and it’s obvious, and it’s so damn insulting. Like someone said upthread, were she Caucasian or even of Asian descent, I really don’t think you’d have this sputtering about how she couldn’t have POSSIBLY earned her accolades on her own merits.

    They have no idea how blatantly obvious they’re making it that they think that people of Hispanic descent are stupid.

  80. 80.

    Rick Taylor

    May 29, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    This is jaw dropping. We endured eight years of proud C-student Bush, along with lectures that was really important wasn’t book-smarts but being a regular guy and trusting one’s gut. We were informed that Sarah Palin was perfectly qualified to be in second in line for most important individual on the planet, based on her PTA experience and her state’s proximity to Russia, and now they really expect to be taken seriously when they say that Obama is a poor speaker who depends on his teleprompter, and a summa cum laude Princeton graduate Yale school law journal editor is stupid?

    And this has nothing to do with race? They didn’t accuse Gore of stupid; an liberal egg-head elitist yes, but not stupid. They didn’t accuse Kerry of being stupid. They didn’t accuse either Bill or Hillary Clinton or John Edwards of being lacking in brains. But Obama or Sotomayor? Sure.

    I resist explaining peoples behavior by saying their racist, but when they start calling summa cum laude Princeton graduate an affirmative action hire of questionable intelligence or ability, I find it difficult to draw any other conclusion.

    While liberal, I’m not that sensitive to racial issues, and I avoid imputing to racism what can be explained by stupidity. So if I’m drawing these conclusions, I think Republicans are in trouble.

  81. 81.

    Trollhattan

    May 29, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    Why is anybody allowed to appear on the teevee device with the author of “Rebel-in-Chief” without a mandatory five-minute stint of mockery, prior to letting him speak?

    Even gamblin’ Bill has to know what a flyweight Barnes is.

  82. 82.

    bago

    May 29, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    @bago: It’s too bad nobody actually follows links anymore.

  83. 83.

    Zuzu's Petals

    May 29, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    I guess Barnes thinks Phi Beta Kappa (Sotomayor was an inductee) is also an affirmative action gig.

  84. 84.

    Dennis-SGMM

    May 29, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    From the NYT, Nov, 2004:

    WASHINGTON, Nov. 11 – Republicans close to the White House said on Thursday that the choice of Alberto R. Gonzales as attorney general was part of a political strategy to bolster Mr. Gonzales’s credentials with conservatives and position him for a possible Supreme Court appointment.
    These Republicans said Mr. Gonzales had been widely viewed as one of President Bush’s top choices for the court. But by first sending him to the Justice Department, they said, Mr. Bush could then nominate a conservative favored by his political base to fill the first vacancy that arises.
    For Mr. Gonzales, tenure as attorney general would allow him to demonstrate his reliability to conservative leaders, many of whom say they are unsure of his views on issues like abortion and affirmative action, Republicans said. One Republican said Mr. Gonzales’s nomination hearings in Congress would also “get out of the way” the debate over legal memorandums that Mr. Gonzales supervised as White House counsel. Civil rights groups say memorandums about the treatment of captured terrorism suspects appeared to endorse the torture of some prisoners and opened the door to abuses at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

  85. 85.

    Little Dreamer

    May 29, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    While liberal, I’m not that sensitive to racial issues, and I avoid imputing to racism what can be explained by stupidity. So if I’m drawing these conclusions, I think Republicans are in trouble.

    Ummm, yeah – the only conclusion I can come to is that if you don’t own popcorn stock, you should look into it.

  86. 86.

    Richard Stanczak

    May 29, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    Mr. Barnes and his ilk will never allow the facts to get in the way of their brilliant conclusions.

    But really, doesn’t anyone ever publicly call these buffoons out on their idiocy?

    Can Stewart or Colbert get this maroon on the air?

  87. 87.

    noncarborundum

    May 29, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @Little Dreamer:

    Barnes obviously doesn’t know what the Summa in Summa Cum Laude means. Here’s a hint Barnes, “there can be only one”.

    Actually, no. Summa cum Laude just means “with highest praise”; there’s no implication that only one person can receive the highest praise. Also, in Latin the superlative is used for “very” as well as “most”, so Summa cum Laude could equally well be translated “with very high praise”.

    Plus, if there’s only one Summa cum Laude, what does this do to Maxima cum Laude?

    I’d wish you the best, but that would just cut everyone else out.

  88. 88.

    bago

    May 29, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    Isn’t “highest” a singular? There can be only one highest, much like there can be only one tallest, and only one loudest.

    Of course this is always subject to the amount of drugs you are on.

  89. 89.

    oh really

    May 29, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    At Princeton, no one has to go to class, do homework, hand in papers, or take exams. Most people don’t know this, but Princeton is actually the worst university on the planet. Sotomayor would have gotten a much better education if she’d gone to a community college — and she could have saved a bundle.

    The question is: Will Princeton University survive the nomination of Maria Sotomayor (sometimes referred to as Sonia) to the Supreme Court?

    Both Bill Bennett and Fred Barnes agree — it seems unlikely.

    Next installment: Just how bad IS Yale Law School?
    Is it really worse than the the Simi Valley Night School of Cosmetology, Auto Mechanics, and Law?

    Tune in, Bill and Fred will reveal the sad truth.

  90. 90.

    Ecks

    May 29, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    Harvard awards latin honors to 50% of their graduating class. Most schools limit to 10%-15%.

    Yeah, that fits with the observation of my buddy who was a grad student at Harvard and apparently was flat out banned from giving C’s to students who richly deserved it.

    This same friend, now that I think about it, is a latina woman and got the prize for 2nd highest GPA at our undergrad college too (really, it’s true, she did)…. Heeeeey wait… I see the pattern now… Very suspicious. Latina women can be smart!

    Wow, there’s a mind blower.

  91. 91.

    noncarborundum

    May 29, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @bago:

    Isn’t “highest” a singular? There can be only one highest, much like there can be only one tallest, and only one loudest.

    Not necessarily. It’s plural in a phrase like “the three highest grades on the test”.

    This helps explain why “ten best dressed” lists typically contain more than one person.

  92. 92.

    Persia

    May 29, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @Xanthippas: Me too. I went to a state college, and I think you needed a 4.8 for a summa.

  93. 93.

    AhabTRuler

    May 29, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    Isn’t “highest” a singular?

    It is the praise that is the highest, not the recipient.

  94. 94.

    KRK

    May 29, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @bago: It’s been mentioned in previous threads.

  95. 95.

    Rick Taylor

    May 29, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    At Princeton, no one has to go to class, do homework, hand in papers, or take exams

    Except for the white students of course. Students like George W Bush have to earn their C at ivy-league schools.

  96. 96.

    Mnemosyne

    May 29, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    @oh really:

    At Princeton, no one has to go to class, do homework, hand in papers, or take exams. Most people don’t know this, but Princeton is actually the worst university on the planet. Sotomayor would have gotten a much better education if she’d gone to a community college—and she could have saved a bundle.

    There was a troll at another blog I frequent who claimed that he knew that Princeton students were all stupid because the valedictorian at his Princeton-graduating son’s ceremony misspoke.

    I told him he must have been pretty pissed to spend all that money and discover that his son could barely get a job at McDonald’s since everyone knows how crappy of a school Princeton is.

    (Personally, I don’t buy into the Ivy League worship and there are plenty of extremely good schools that are equally as good as any Ivy, but trying to pretend that Princeton is the equivalent of, say, #1 party school University of Florida is patently ridiculous.)

  97. 97.

    noncarborundum

    May 29, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    @Persia:

    I think you needed a 4.8 for a summa.

    3.8, maybe? The scale only goes up to 4.

  98. 98.

    Zuzu's Petals

    May 29, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    @jibeaux:

    Well of course the Boston Herald is neither large, nor a real newspaper. It’s a wingnut tabloid that is justifiably (IMO) declining into oblivion.

    But good point about the blogging thing.

  99. 99.

    Doctor Science

    May 29, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    On the contrary, Sotomayor was actually admitted to Princeton under a restrictive quota system which explicitly limited the number of women who could get in, and which ensured that no man risked “losing his place” to a woman.

    Samuel Alito, on the other hand, was part of an organization that wanted to make that quota even smaller, so that Princeton would keep its “identity” as a place for rich white men and a few hard-working scholarship boys (like Alito himself).

  100. 100.

    Martin

    May 29, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    Yeah, that fits with the observation of my buddy who was a grad student at Harvard and apparently was flat out banned from giving C’s to students who richly deserved it.

    Well, for those that may not know, C’s are considered failing grades in graduate school which doesn’t undermine your point, but some people may not realize that.

    But I have a joke about Harvard: The only thing harder than getting into Harvard is flunking out. They take grade inflation to amazing levels. Their general attitude is that every student deserves an ‘A’, because a ‘B’ Harvard student would still be better than an ‘A’ student anywhere else, so why weigh them down with grades that undermines their exceptionalness?

  101. 101.

    Martin

    May 29, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    BTW, everyone needs to read Doctor Sciences linked post above, particularly someone who can highlight it on the front-page.

  102. 102.

    Ecks

    May 29, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    Well, for those that may not know, C’s are considered failing grades in graduate school which doesn’t undermine your point, but some people may not realize that.

    No no, this is when she was being a TA for undergrads. She would be unable to assign less than an A to some pretty awful essays (though to be fair, the “awful” essays at Harvard tended to be smoothly written, because you don’t get in there without being able to write a slick essay, they would just be glib and totally devoid of any content that the course was supposed to be requiring).

    Interestingly, her other observation was that the brightest students at Harvard weren’t any better than the brightest students at our good-but-non-Ivy undergrad school, Harvard just filtered out about the bottom third of the good-but-not-spectacular students we went to undergrad with.

  103. 103.

    jibeaux

    May 29, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    @Zuzu’s Petals:

    Ah. Am I thinking of the Globe, is that the big paper? I’m not from ’round those parts.

  104. 104.

    Little Dreamer

    May 29, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    @bago:

    Thank you bago, you got my point.

    The highest praise is that the one at the top.

    My point was not to say that others didn’t graduate Summa Cum Laude, but the highest (Summa) is the top of the list of honors.

  105. 105.

    Little Dreamer

    May 29, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    Someone’s screwing with Ajax again.

    “You are not allowed to edit this comment”.

  106. 106.

    Da Bomb

    May 29, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    @SGEW:
    Tell me about it. Where’s my affirmative action payout. I was also placed on Yale’s waiting list. I am ear deep in debt as well. I didn’t receive my “Black pell grant” or “we are giving you this scholarship, because you’re black!” money either.

  107. 107.

    Colette

    May 29, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    From one of the commenter’s at Malkin’s blog, with no apparent sense of irony:

    Everyone here does realize that white males are a minority. We certainly make up less than 50% of the population. We need some affirmative action, too!

    Excuse me, I have to go take a shower now.

  108. 108.

    MoXmas

    May 29, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    The statement is the typical bullshit from Barnes, but I do know where that pipe is coming from. My Dad graduated from Harvard in the 60’s, and at the time, it was pretty common for anyone in the top half of the class to get “cum laude” honors.

    Nothing to do with Summa Cum Laude, of course, though I’d bet Barnes doesn’t know the difference. So it was actually an example of him trying to sound like an insider, and not even doing that right.

  109. 109.

    gwangung

    May 29, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    BARNES: I guess it is, but you know, there’s some schools and maybe Princeton’s not one of them, where if you don’t get Summa Cum Laude then or some kind of Cum Laude, you then, you’re a D+ student.

    And if one were an honest pundit and not an intellectually bankrupt liar, you could do some simple research and find out.

    One does wonder…

  110. 110.

    rikyrah

    May 29, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    They are who we thought they were.

    Plain and simple.

    Keep ’em coming.

  111. 111.

    asiangrrlMN

    May 29, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    I graduated from a decent liberal arts college Magna Cum Laude, and I was Phi Beta Kappa, too. Let me tell you, it wasn’t easy by any stretch of the imagination, and my school was not anywhere near Ivy League. I agree that it’s perhaps not as hard to stay in an Ivy League school than it is to get in, but this assertion by Barnes is ridiculous.

    In the future, I would like to know the academic resumes of anyone who is deriding Sotomayor for not being very smart.

    By the way, my school reserved something like twenty-five percent of its slots for legacy students, and more for males than females because we were short men. In addition, they minority rate was eight percent when I entered, and around eleven when I left. You tell me who the real affirmative action students were?

  112. 112.

    DougJ

    May 29, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    3.8, maybe? The scale only goes up to 4.

    This one goes to 11.

  113. 113.

    ronathan richardson

    May 30, 2009 at 12:24 am

    You know, I didn’t really think conservatives who hated affirmative action were racist, just small minded and selfish. I’ve been proven wrong. They think any minority who has succeeded is a racist idiot that guilty rich whites pulled out of the projects into an ivy league education and then prominent job. If I were a minority I would start shooting old white men this week.

  114. 114.

    bob h

    May 30, 2009 at 7:08 am

    If you got a Summa from a gut department at Princeton, say Spanish, it might not mean too much, but Sonia got hers in the History department, which is very big and very competitive. And the Pyne Prize is Princeton’s way of saying this is the very best student in the class of 800+ students, the very best product we have.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Jules Crittenden » Compelling BS Line says:
    May 29, 2009 at 10:57 am

    […] need something to counter Sotomayor’s slam on uptight white guys. By the way, speaking of tortured relationships with higher education, what is it lefty elites have against state school […]

  2. cleek » Someone Needs a Gramprin says:
    May 29, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    […] GOP’s alienation of Hispanics over Obama’s Supreme Court nominee (really, it’s so blatant, offensive and random, it’s like watching a Tourette’s sufferer at a Cinco De Mayo […]

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - arrieve - Antarctica Part 2 5
Image by arrieve (6/23/25)

Recent Comments

  • Steve LaBonne on Odds & Ends (Open Thread) (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:36pm)
  • Steve LaBonne on Odds & Ends (Open Thread) (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:36pm)
  • Professor Bigfoot on Odds & Ends (Open Thread) (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:35pm)
  • Harrison Wesley on Odds & Ends (Open Thread) (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:34pm)
  • George Kennan Was Right on Medium Cool – Hot & Cold! Wet or Dry. Let’s Talk About Weather in Films & TV! (Jun 23, 2025 @ 2:34pm)

Personality Crisis Podcast (Cole, DougJ, mistermix)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!