• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

DeSantis transforming Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

When you’re in more danger from the IDF than from Russian shelling, that’s really bad.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

“But what about the lurkers?”

How stupid are these people?

If you are still in the gop, you are either an extremist yourself, or in bed with those who are.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

“Until such time as the world ends, we will act as though it intends to spin on.”

We will not go back.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

At some point, the ability to learn is a factor of character, not IQ.

“Alexa, change the president.”

I have other things to bitch about but those will have to wait.

After dobbs, women are no longer free.

Giving in to doom is how authoritarians win.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Glenn, I’m only blogging

Glenn, I’m only blogging

by DougJ|  June 9, 20097:33 pm| 39 Comments

This post is in: Assholes, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

I will say this for Ed Whelan. His apology was nowhere near as weasely as this crap from Jeff Rosen:

“It was a short Web piece,” Rosen says now, sounding a little shellshocked. “I basically thought of it as a blog entry.”

[….]

Above all, Rosen says he’s drawn a lesson from how his initial essay was treated by people of both ideological stripes. He won’t be blogging any more. He wants to spend more time with the material before hitting “send.”

But, all in all, Whelan’s apology and Rosen’s non-apology are cut from the same cloth. They’re both assholes who weren’t able to get away with their usual bullshit and were forced to make some kind of amends. It’s naive and simplistic to wonder about their consciences and ethics and what not. The criticism got loud enough, and they acted accordingly.

Mostly, there’s good news here. After seeing Whelan and Rosen brought to their knees, others will think twice about outing bloggers and smearing Supreme Court nominees.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Wet Dog and a Shrill Cat
Next Post: Penguins v. Red Wings, Game 6 »

Reader Interactions

39Comments

  1. 1.

    kid bitzer

    June 9, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    “He won’t be blogging any more. ”

    translation: “i won’t be doing that irresponsible, thoughtless, unresearched shooting my mouth off that, you know, *bloggers* do. i’ll only do thoughtful, responsible, well-researched *journamalism*.”

    yeah, fuck you too, rosen. lots of bloggers do more research than you ever do when you call it “journalism”.

  2. 2.

    HumboldtBlue

    June 9, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    After seeing Whelan and Rosen brought to their knees, others will think twice about outing bloggers and smearing Supreme Court nominees.

    Yeah, uh-huh, and then ponies will fly outta my ass while rainbows cover the skies and Palin becomes the next Pulitzer winner in physics.

    Two clowns get called out, while the biggest mouths of all get a free pass, or are we to believe Sotomayor is truly a racialist?

  3. 3.

    DougJ

    June 9, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    yeah, fuck you too, rosen. lots of bloggers do more research than you ever do when you call it “journalism”.

    What’s interesting is that I do think what nearly all bloggers do is certainly not journalism the way Woodward and Bernstein were, or Dana Priest is, or the countless thousands of correspondents who risk their lives in places like North Korea are. But neither is most of what TNR does.

  4. 4.

    GeoX

    June 9, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    Awesome David Bowie reference there. And that is all I have to say.

  5. 5.

    dmsilev

    June 9, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    He wants to spend more time with the material before hitting “send.”

    Every bit as convincing as a politician under fire retiring to “spend more time with his family”.

    -dms

  6. 6.

    calipygian

    June 9, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    It’s actually refreshing to see those shitheel republicans back down for once and not double down – Rosen, Douchebag Whelen, O’Reilly a couple of times this week, even Newtie Newt had to back track off Sotomayor a little.

    The only one who hasn’t yet is Rush, who came “this close” to calling Obama a half-breed today. I wonder just how outrageous he has to get before he backs down.

  7. 7.

    Mr. Furious

    June 9, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    others will think twice about outing bloggers and smearing Supreme Court nominees

    Yeah. If only.

    Rosen’s hit piece did its job—it supplied the Right Wing Noise Machine™ with ammunition. Doesn’t matter about the p. A32 retractions. Once it’s out there, it’s a source to those fuckers.

    As for outing bloggers, that type of (over)reaction is being bred into the current crop of righties—shoot first, expect cover, only clean up when required.

  8. 8.

    demkat620

    June 9, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    Um, Ron Christie just reaffirmed on the Ed Show that Sotomayor is a racist. Or did you mean that satirically?

    ‘Cause then, yeah.

  9. 9.

    cvcobb01

    June 9, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    Was thinking along the same lines as dms. Thought it hilarious that Rosen quit blogging to spend more time with his material.

  10. 10.

    DougJ

    June 9, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    Um, Ron Christie just reaffirmed on the Ed Show that Sotomayor is a racist.

    In fairness, that stuff doesn’t come from Rosen.

  11. 11.

    DougJ

    June 9, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    Was thinking along the same lines as dms. Thought it hilarious that Rosen quit blogging to spend more time with his material.

    Great observation from both of you. Wish I’d thought of it for the post.

  12. 12.

    dmsilev

    June 9, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    @calipygian:

    The only one who hasn’t yet is Rush, who came “this close” to calling Obama a half-breed today. I wonder just how outrageous he has to get before he backs down.

    Part of me thinks there’s no limit, but I think highly explicit profanity, including racial slurs at the level of n*gg*r, would cause his advertisers to head for the hills, which would cause him to back down. It’d set a new record for “most grudging apology”, but I think Rush likes his bank account and mammoth contract too much to risk them.

    I’ll pick “just after the 2010 elections” in the pool for when it will happen.

    -dms

  13. 13.

    Laura W

    June 9, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    @demkat620: Campbell Brown is about to tell us why Obama just may be more popular than effective.
    Never in my life would I think that I would be so damn grateful that an ice hockey game is coming on in two minutes.

    Doug, please don’t let John forget about a hockey thread, as swept up as he is in new dog smell tonight.

  14. 14.

    demkat620

    June 9, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    @DougJ: No, it doesn’t but its a smear nonetheless.

    Rosen’s piece was bad. And it became the main talking point for the GOP. I can’t believe he didn’t have enough self awareness to realize that would happen.

  15. 15.

    dmsilev

    June 9, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    @DougJ:

    Great observation from both of you. Wish I’d thought of it for the post.

    Feel free to steal it. We’re all just a bunch of lazy good-for-nothing ethics-free bathrobe-wearing bloggers after all.

    -dms

  16. 16.

    JL

    June 9, 2009 at 8:01 pm

    As for outing bloggers, that type of (over)reaction is being bred into the current crop of righties—shoot first, expect cover, only clean up when required.

    Whelan’s apology was in his best interest since he’s on an ethics committee. It was meaningless

  17. 17.

    demkat620

    June 9, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    @JL: No, I’ll give Whelan credit for a decent apology, maybe he realized it was a shitty move.

  18. 18.

    The Grand Panjandrum

    June 9, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    OT: Cool Lily ad on the left hand side of the blog! AND it links to the original Lily post. Nice.

  19. 19.

    BombIranForChrist

    June 9, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    Honestly, this is the A Number One reason I value blogs: fact-checking and bullshit calling. I am sometimes skeptical by the analysis of blogs of all political stripes, because I think there is a lot of (unconscious) group think and not enough original thinking, but if all blogs do is push back against sloppy writers and / or guilty assholes, it’s worth all the other stuff.

  20. 20.

    geg6

    June 9, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    Rosen is has outed himself as tje world’s biggest WATB EVER. When a batshit insane wingnut like Whelen at least superficially looks classier than you, you are officially Wendy Whiner forever more. His reaction is simply that he’s taking his ball and going home. Like anybody gives a shit about his now worthless ball.

  21. 21.

    JK

    June 9, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    @Laura W:

    Campbell Brown is a clueless, useless tool like Jeffrey Rosen. She’s also married to former Bush appointee Dan Senor.

    CNN should have fired her when she was on maternity leave.

    Brown’s slogan No Bias, No Bull is as phony and dishonest as We Report, You Decide.

  22. 22.

    Laura W

    June 9, 2009 at 8:30 pm

    @JK:

    CNN should have fired her when she was on maternity leave.

    The network that still has Larry King and Lou Dobbs in prime time?
    It’s nice to have a dream…

    OH, and this. CNN hearts twitter! I just watched this a bit ago and meant to write his line down, it was so funny.

    http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/06/09/john-stewart-takes-on-twitter-and-cnn/

  23. 23.

    jrg

    June 9, 2009 at 8:34 pm

    He won’t be blogging any more.

    What is it about HTML that makes people write crap? If he could only stick to using crayons and paper, the quality of his research would be much, much better. Yep, that’s the source of the problem.

  24. 24.

    Laura W

    June 9, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    @Laura W:

    CNN, We’re All Like, I Know!

  25. 25.

    Joe Lisboa

    June 9, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    O/T: Seconding Laura W on the need for a hockey thread. I’ll try not to start this one +4 like the last game.

  26. 26.

    DougJ

    June 9, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    Honestly, this is the A Number One reason I value blogs: fact-checking and bullshit calling. I am sometimes skeptical by the analysis of blogs of all political stripes, because I think there is a lot of (unconscious) group think and not enough original thinking, but if all blogs do is push back against sloppy writers and / or guilty assholes, it’s worth all the other stuff.

    I agree.

  27. 27.

    Laura W

    June 9, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    @Joe Lisboa:

    I’ll try not to start this one +4 like the last game.

    Oopsie Doodle!

    So Joe…last game both Tim and John threw up a thread within 5 min. of each other and you had to choose whose thread you were gonna play in. Tonight many of us have begged both John and DougJ for a thread for the whole first quarter (half? third?) and no thread. I smell a conspiracy. Or a new dog.

  28. 28.

    kth

    June 9, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    Rosen seems, from that quote, to be as disturbed by the wingnuts citing his article as the source for their “Sotomayor’s a pushy dumbshit” chorus, as by the DFHs mad at him for enabling those wingnuts. So give him credit for that, though if he didn’t foresee what the right would make of his reporting, that doesn’t say a lot for his intelligence.

  29. 29.

    Rosali

    June 9, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    Campbell Brown is a clueless, useless tool

    She has her moments but the part of her show where she tries to get the debaters to agree on something is stupid. It seems like she’s looking for agreement just for sake of agreement and not because she’s really trying to promote greater understanding.

  30. 30.

    Jason

    June 9, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    @jrg:

    What is it about HTML that makes people write crap?

    Precisely, as if Rosen thinks it’s some accident of the genre that made Rosen write poorly. And that’s the funny thing: I doubt Rosen is writing anything that constitutes “blog” – his apology simply passes the buck to the activity (and tarring a lot of his critics with the same brush). It wasn’t like “I could’ve done the research but I had a thorny Rails issue to work out first – it’s so hard to blog, what with all the technical stuff”

  31. 31.

    TenguPhule

    June 9, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    “It was a short Web piece,” Rosen says now, sounding a little shellshocked. “I basically thought of it as a blog entry.”

    Fuck Rosen and his double insult to journalists and blogs.

  32. 32.

    Woody

    June 9, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    Sonia Sotomayor violated the prime directive: Never shalt thou acknowledge, much less discuss, “White, Male Privilege.”

    She will be required to PROFUSELY apologise, and to supplicate herself an a ritual of flagellant self-abasement for her sin., and to promise NEVER to treat any non-White person with the deference due their white male counterpart. Just to prove her ‘even-handedness,’ you understand…

  33. 33.

    kid bitzer

    June 9, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    12, 26–

    “I think there is a lot of (unconscious) group think and not enough original thinking”

    exactly. that’s just what i think, too.

  34. 34.

    jcricket

    June 9, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    After seeing Whelan and Rosen brought to their knees, others will think twice about outing bloggers and smearing Supreme Court nominees.

    Just like anti-abortion nut-jobs are going to stop after the outpouring of criticism for their murder of Dr. Tiller, right?

    At the very least this should be a lesson for progressives.

    Waiting around and writing the occasional sternly worded letter is fracking stupid.

    Fight back. Keep it up.

    When we’re right, we will win (even if the person on the other side doesn’t back down).

  35. 35.

    brian griffin

    June 10, 2009 at 12:01 am

    I don’t know Rosen, but he’s a friend of a close friend of mine, and I understand he was genuinely blown away, and mortified, by the reaction to his article. apparently he was trying to make the point that sotomayor was not rigorously liberal enough, and so he never expected the response he got.

    Hearing about his reaction really made me wonder– do most dc pundits & insider journalists just not see the news sources the way avid consumers of the news (like the folks here) do?

    when I pick up the new republic, I expect to find several articles that play conservatives and liberals against each other in a self-serving way. so I saw this that way. if it were in something more reliably liberal, maybe it would’ve been read differently. do reporters not know this?

    This whole Rosen flap has really made me think the tunnel vision in the village is much much worse than I thought.

  36. 36.

    Brachiator

    June 10, 2009 at 1:47 am

    After seeing Whelan and Rosen brought to their knees, others will think twice about outing bloggers and smearing Supreme Court nominees.

    Did you stifle a chuckle when you wrote this?

    Whelan made an apology. I think it is more effective if it came about because he reconsidered his position, than if he is bowing to the collective will of the mob.

    And the GOP has not yet begun to smear. This is what they live for.

  37. 37.

    MBunge

    June 10, 2009 at 11:08 am

    Can we please stop with the silly and, frankly, insulting use of the word “outing” in reference to bloggers? Whatever your views on pseudonymity, forcing someone to put their name to their publicly expressed opinions is in no meaningful way equivalent to revealing someone’s sexual orientation.

    Mike

  38. 38.

    Dan

    June 10, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    Best post title ever.

  39. 39.

    brantl

    June 10, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    Can we please stop with the silly and, frankly, insulting use of the word “outing” in reference to bloggers? Whatever your views on pseudonymity, forcing someone to put their name to their publicly expressed opinions is in no meaningful way equivalent to revealing someone’s sexual orientation

    . Actually, yes it can be. If you haven’t followed publius’ explanation of the problems it can cause him AND his family, you’re undereducated, on this.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - beckya57 - Copper Canyon, Mexico, April 2025
Image by beckya57 (7/31/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • bjacques on War for Ukraine Day 1,231: Wednesday is a Repeat of Tuesday and Thursday Will Likely Be a Repeat of Wednesday (Jul 10, 2025 @ 2:01am)
  • Msb on The Texas Flood Tragedies Continue (Jul 10, 2025 @ 2:00am)
  • Ruckus on Wednesday Night Open Thread (Jul 10, 2025 @ 1:51am)
  • cain on Wednesday Night Open Thread (Jul 10, 2025 @ 1:35am)
  • cain on Wednesday Night Open Thread (Jul 10, 2025 @ 1:30am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!