• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

In my day, never was longer.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

It’s pointless to bring up problems that can only be solved with a time machine.

We will not go quietly into the night; we will not vanish without a fight.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

The lights are all blinking red.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

The desire to stay informed is directly at odds with the need to not be constantly enraged.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson is the bland and smiling face of evil.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

Many life forms that would benefit from greater intelligence, sadly, do not have it.

There is no compromise when it comes to body autonomy. You either have it or you do not.

We’re watching the self-immolation of the leading world power on a level unprecedented in human history.

Every decision we make has lots of baggage with it, known or unknown.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

When you’re in more danger from the IDF than from Russian shelling, that’s really bad.

With all due respect and assumptions of good faith, please fuck off into the sun.

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

Disagreements are healthy; personal attacks are not.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing

Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing

by John Cole|  June 30, 20098:43 am| 12 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Keeping it real on Sotomayor:

The Supreme Court’s rejection of a decision against white firefighters endorsed by Judge Sonia Sotomayor gives Republicans a renewed chance to attack her speeches and writings but is not expected to imperil her confirmation to the high court, political and legal sources said yesterday.

I guess the summer silly season is as good a time as any for this.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « There Will Be Blood
Next Post: Most of America Still Disagrees with President McCain »

Reader Interactions

12Comments

  1. 1.

    SpotWeld

    June 30, 2009 at 8:49 am

    I for one will be spending the weekend instead dealing with the sound and the furry (in Pittsburgh).

  2. 2.

    PaulW

    June 30, 2009 at 8:52 am

    Obama could have chosen Oliver Wendell Holmes for the Supreme Court and the conservatives would still attack the nomination with the same amount of venom. It’s all about hurting Obama and the Democrats, no matter the cost, no matter how stupid they make themselves. Just look at them salivating over the Ricci decision. How the hell does a 5-4 decision become 9-0??? Kongratulashuns Konservateves, we Now Know you Kan’t Kount!

  3. 3.

    Jay Severin Has A Small Pen1s

    June 30, 2009 at 8:59 am

    I’m more concerned about Thomas being the 1 justice to decide that strip-searching a 13-year-old girl was constitutional. The other 8 disagreed with him. So if Sotomayor was wrong by a 5-4 decision, that makes Thomas a pedophile that endorses molesting teenage girls.

  4. 4.

    chopper

    June 30, 2009 at 9:01 am

    but sotomayor decided that settled law and precedent should steer an appellate court’s decision! don’t you see, that’s the worst kind of judicial activism.

  5. 5.

    Litlebritdifrnt

    June 30, 2009 at 9:01 am

    Chuck Todd had an interesting take this morning, he basically said that in the lower court’s decision they were following established law, whereas SCOTUS with their decision have basically made up a new law and were legislating from the bench. So the conservative justices were “legislating from the bench” and the libs were “following established law” wonder how the wingnuts are going to spin that one?

    PS) John the maters were romas and thanks for the compliments about my flowers. Sorry to hear about your veggie plants, I have had some spectacular disasters this year thanks to bugs and since I stay organic I am just going to roll with the punches and try again later in the year with some new plants.

    PPS) If your mater plants committed suicide it may be tomato spotted wilt virus, you will have to burn the plants and will more than likely not be successful in the same spot with new ones.
    http://vegetablemdonline.ppath.cornell.edu/factsheets/Virus_SpottedWilt.htm

  6. 6.

    John S.

    June 30, 2009 at 9:10 am

    Even more fascinating was the decision yesterday in the state of New York vs. federal bank regulators.

    It was a 5-4 ruling, but with Scalia writing the majority opinion while siding with the four liberal justices. Roberts, Alito and company were all in the minority.

    Strange times, my friends.

  7. 7.

    Comrade Stuck

    June 30, 2009 at 10:13 am

    @chopper:

    but sotomayor decided that settled law and precedent should steer an appellate court’s decision! don’t you see, that’s the worst kind of judicial activism.

    Second only to judges whose decisions cause wingnuts to actively make hypocritical fools of themselves.

  8. 8.

    John PM

    June 30, 2009 at 10:36 am

    Actually, the Republican meme needs to be taken down a few further pegs in addition to the 9-0 nonsense. To the extent that anyone is saying that Sotomayor wrote the decision of the Second Circuit, they are incorrect. SCOTUS blog gets closer when it says that Sotomayor endorsed the decision of the federal district court in Connecticut, but even that is not entirely accurate. Here is the relevant passage from Justice Ginsberg’s dissent:

    In a decision summarily affirmed by the Court of Appeals, the District Court granted summary judgment for respondents. 554 F.Supp.2d 142 (Conn.2006), aff’d, 530 F.3d 87 (C.A.2 2008) (per curiam).

    There was no decision from the Second Circuit that was authored, but merely an order saying that the Second Circuit was adopting the well-reasoned opinion of the district court. The firefighters then brought a motion for rehearing by all 13 judges of the Second Circuit. Rehearing was denied 7-6. Several judges on the Second Circuit wrote both in support of and in dissent of the decision to deny rehearing en banc (by the entire panel). Notably, Sotomayor was not one of those judges. Another interesting fact is that the main opinions on both sides of the denial of rehearing en banc were all Clinton appointees.

    Including the district court and the Second Circuit Judges, in total 8 judges supported New Haven’s position, while 5 supported the firefighters. Because the 5 who supported the firefighters were all on the Supreme Court, the firefighters ultimately won, although they will still have to show what their damages were since the proceeding was only at the summary judgment stage.

    WHEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING, Republicans can suck it!

    Respectfully submitted,

    etc., etc.

  9. 9.

    shelley matheis

    June 30, 2009 at 10:36 am

    Silly season indeed. If you went by the comments over on Free Republic, you’d think it was election night and Palin had, oops sorry, McCain had won. I felt like posting, “Jeez, calm down, guys. You must be reeeeally desperate for some kind of ‘good’ news. Well, this ain’t it. It’s hardly a ‘slap in the face’ to the Obama administration. And how unusual do you think it is for a judge to have one of their decisions reversed in their lifetime?”

  10. 10.

    JohnR

    June 30, 2009 at 11:19 am

    And yet, the morning blurb on NPR said something to the effect that this decision would give ammunition to those who criticized Sotomayor’s decision. It’s like being eaten to death by waves of cockroaches – it comes from everywhere, there’s no escape, and it’s simply wrong.

  11. 11.

    Brachiator

    June 30, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    The Supreme Court’s rejection of a decision against white firefighters endorsed by Judge Sonia Sotomayor gives Republicans a renewed chance to attack her speeches and writings but is not expected to imperil her confirmation to the high court, political and legal sources said yesterday.

    There is a tactical issue at work here as well. Dubya kept pushing judicial nominess, and even finagled them onto the bench with recess appointments if necessary. And even when they were rejected by the Senate, Bush would resurrect them from the dead.

    The GOP wants to try to flex their muscles somewhere, and the court appears to be a place where they retain some influence.

    Obama, on the other hand, wants Sotomayor seated so that she can be part of the Court’s opening session in the fall. Supreme Court appointments are one of the few areas where a president can assert his (or her) will. Even more than a legislative victory, Obama needs to vanquish the GOP here in order to clearly knock down their assumptions about who is in charge.

  12. 12.

    Daniel

    July 1, 2009 at 11:45 am

    Obama needs to vanquish the GOP here in order to clearly knock down their assumptions about who is in charge.

    Good to see we live in such post-partisan times, eh?

    Funny thing about the role of Justice is that it’s not at all a meritocracy. Alito had plenty of decisions overturned as well and yet we managed to become Justice.

    However, to quote New Haven firefighter Mike Marcarelli, “You know, this is not about Judge Sotomayor. This is about 20 New Haven firefighters that were denied promotion on the basis of their race, and we fought a long, hard battle, not just for ourselves, but for firefighters and public safety personnel and public safety in general throughout the country.” (as quoted at newsy.com)

    I think it’s worth considering while we’re busy attacking each other (which I’d argue is actually a good thing, since it’s the assumption that our check and balance system relies on) that there are other issues which, while affected by politics, really aren’t about politics.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/10.25)

Recent Comments

  • Tim C on Late Night Open Thread: #TSLA Troubles (May 21, 2025 @ 12:50am)
  • Jackie on Late Night Open Thread: #TSLA Troubles (May 21, 2025 @ 12:39am)
  • SpaceUnit on Late Night Open Thread: #TSLA Troubles (May 21, 2025 @ 12:35am)
  • Craig on Late Night Open Thread: #TSLA Troubles (May 21, 2025 @ 12:35am)
  • Craig on Late Night Open Thread: #TSLA Troubles (May 21, 2025 @ 12:33am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!