There’s an online chat going on with Ezra Klein right now. I found the last one extremely informative.
Reader Interactions
16Comments
Comments are closed.
by DougJ| 16 Comments
This post is in: Domestic Politics, Media
There’s an online chat going on with Ezra Klein right now. I found the last one extremely informative.
Comments are closed.
PeakVT
Certain better than the chat with Pershing.
R-Jud
Do I have to click? It’s the WaPo, I feel dirty.
The Grand Panjandrum
And he just put this up on the chat.
That, in a nutshell, is the argument FOR a public option.
R-Jud
“The thing about the market is that it doesn’t solve problems. It works towards efficiencies.”
I think I’m going to do a cross-stitch of that and hang it in the living room.
slippytoad
@The Grand Panjandrum:
More succinctly I think the way to put it is this:
The free market is an excellent solution to the problem of how to make a lot of money. It is the worst solution possible for how to provide for society’s needs.
Sentient Puddle
@The Grand Panjandrum: Feature, not a bug in the minds of libertarians. I bet you wouldn’t have to look too hard to find a libertarian arguing that the way to reform health care is to let these bastards die off, and cut costs by letting these bastards die off rather than throw money and try to save them.
Paul L.
I have to give Ezra credit for this or an Andrew Sullivan Yglesias Award
The left denounced Guilt by association for “wingnuts” linking Obama with Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright.
Nice to see Ezra defend Megan McArdle from Guilt by association.
Is Megan McArdle Right About Everything?
b-psycho
I wish they’d say ahead of time when the cutoff was for questions. I submitted mine & when the page reloaded it said the chat was over.
Jonny Scrum-half
I thought that Klein’s explanation quoted by The Grand Panjandrum was really well-stated, especially the part about how the inability of some people to purchase health insurance isn’t a failure of the market, but rather it’s solution. Klein makes me think of things in a way that the typical BS talking-points don’t.
Also, I like how Klein actually engaged the questioners, which from my observation is very different than when a “mainstream” journalist does the chat. Then, it often seems like they’re annoyed with having to defend/explain themselves.
Sentient Puddle — I consider myself a libertarian. It must be real easy to form opinions when anyone who disagrees with you is evil.
Tax Analyst
Paul L. said:
“I have to give Ezra credit for this or an Andrew Sullivan Yglesias Award
The left denounced Guilt by association for “wingnuts” linking Obama with Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright.
Nice to see Ezra defend Megan McArdle from Guilt by association.”
I hope you realize what a slight “endorsement” that is. All he is saying is “don’t blame McArdle for her parents follies and excesses.” Hell, that’s simple fairness.
He still considers her “wrong” on almost everything.
Sentient Puddle
And I consider myself a libertarian too! Only I didn’t like Bush wiretapping me without a warrant.
We’re all smart enough to catch the context of how the word is being used. I’m not interested in playing incredibly pedantic semantics games in these instances. Yes, that does mean it comes across as a generalization, but when I’m calling out Randian economics, trying to draw a line separating it from everything else with pinpoint precision is just a waste of everyone’s time.
Jonny Scrum-half
Sentient Puddle — I didn’t like Bush wiretapping without a warrant either, or a lot of other things that Bush did.
To be honest, I’m not smart enough to understand the context of your statement. I just think that it’s ridiculous — and generally unhelpful — when people claim that supporters of various policy positions with which they disagree [choose one or more: want people to die; are racist; hate America; are Communist; love criminals; are fascist, etc.] How is your statement any different than the Republican argument that the public option will result in old people being forced into assisted suicide?
Sentient Puddle
The Republican argument has no basis in fact. That’s what’s different.
srv
Y’all ever going to fix the blogroll entry for Ezra?
Warren Terra
Ezra gives good chat. I never read any WaPo chats on their own pages, but I always read the full chat transcripts Ezra posts to his blog. In particular, the “free market” answer Pajandrum quoted was indeed great.
And srv @ #14 has an excellent point.
pattonbt
I just wish the R’s would say what they really mean. We (whomever we define as ‘we’ and not ‘the other’) want government funded healthcare but we dont want to have to pay for it. Its all about money.
I have two kool-aid swilling R’s in my department and they, by strange coincidence (not), are also extreme christian fundamentalists. They hate the idea of publicly funded healthcare. Hate, hate, hate it. They claim all this Jesus love crap and then out the other side of their mouth whisper about having to pay for ‘them’ (or truthfully anyone else). Its the politics of selfishness. Thats fine with me, but at least honestly own it, dont try and wrap it up in stoopid.
I have another friend in the company who just admits it. He’s high up, he loves his money and he doesnt want to part with any of it. I call him a callous douchebag he calls me a DFH and we can still be on OK terms because he is at least honest.