• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

White supremacy is terrorism.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

The willow is too close to the house.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

T R E 4 5 O N

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Not all heroes wear capes.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / You Mean Rush Might Be Wrong?

You Mean Rush Might Be Wrong?

by John Cole|  September 6, 20097:17 pm| 117 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Watch CBS Videos Online

Everyone knows global warming and climate change is a hoax to surrender more of your liberty to the Commie Lieberals.

You know what would fix this problem? Deregulation and tax breaks for loggers. I learned that at Reason magazine and from the Heritage foundation.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The Say Anything Brigade Strikes Again
Next Post: Sunday Night Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

117Comments

  1. 1.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    We need a national meme hunt to track down the “conserve” in “conservatism”.

  2. 2.

    clone12

    September 6, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    And firefighter vouchers! Don’t forget firefighter vouchers!

  3. 3.

    Comrade Mary

    September 6, 2009 at 7:24 pm

    You are one speedy man, John Cole. I just finished watching the entire report.

  4. 4.

    Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle

    September 6, 2009 at 7:27 pm

    Who funds Reason anyway? Don’t tell me Koch and the other nutbags.

  5. 5.

    Comrade Mary

    September 6, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    Plus: I just can’t watch much news or read much blogging any more. Can’t. I’m sick of evil and stupidity. I’m here because there’s some real humanity present, plus gallows humour, plus, of course, Tunch and Lily.

  6. 6.

    Punchy

    September 6, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    Just watched this bit on 60 Minz. Sad as shit. Between this and the news that the Artic is basically fucked and the ocean is wicked warm and acidic and the coral reefs are to be almost completely bleached in 40 years makes me want to puke. Especially when I see Boortz and Beck tell me that the Earth cant be warming cuz today’s high was only 70F when the daily norm is 72

  7. 7.

    me

    September 6, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    You Mean Rush Might Be Wrong?

    Does the Pope shit in the woods?

  8. 8.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    @Comrade Mary:

    Can I pretend to be Canadian, just for a little while?

  9. 9.

    Comrade Mary

    September 6, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    Meh, we aren’t doing much better. We’ve got four shit-for-brains political parties up here which may be jostling their way to the 27th national election in two years.

  10. 10.

    Comrade Mary

    September 6, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    But yeah, we still have health care. Let me forge you an OHIP card, OK?

  11. 11.

    The Grand Panjandrum

    September 6, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    You do realize that if we pray hard enough all of this will go away. Right? Jefferson and Madison dying on the same day 50 years after the Declaration of Independence was issued is all the proof we need that we are a blessed nation and nothing could possibly go wrong that we can’t fix with tax breaks, free markets and copies of Atlas Shrugged in hand. As long as the innovators and industrialists don’t disappear EVERYTHING will be fine.

  12. 12.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    @Comrade Mary:

    I live on the Mexican border, and already have personal healthcare, but having a Beck of a time keeping sane while watching my fellow citizens keel over who don’t have it.

    Do you need any more wingnuts up there? We are lousy with them.

  13. 13.

    Leelee for Obama

    September 6, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    @The Grand Panjandrum: It was Jefferson and Adams, otherwise, you are perfectly in line with the CW, you betcha!

  14. 14.

    Keith

    September 6, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    *More* CO2 would help put out the fires! Yippee!!!!

  15. 15.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    September 6, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    @Comrade Mary: I’m with you.

  16. 16.

    MikeJ

    September 6, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    It was Jefferson and Adams, otherwise, you are perfectly in line with the CW, you betcha!

    Michael Kinsley comes after you so called “fact checkers”.

    http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2009/09/michael-kinsley-mocks-factcheckers.html

  17. 17.

    John Cole

    September 6, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    @MikeJ: I read that Kinsley stuff at ObWi this morning and was like “WTF?”

    That happens a lot for me these days.

  18. 18.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    September 6, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    @Punchy: I know it seems all doom and gloom, but there are some good things happening regarding climate change. Only time will tell if we can turn the Titanic around, but I remain hopeful.

    I saw so many wind turbines and solar panels in Boston recently, which surprised me. They were everywhere.

    And I spoke with someone who works in the green industry in MA – similar to the one I work in, and they are as busy as we are, hardly able to keep up the pace.

    BTW, I HATE the term green, but will save that rant for another time

  19. 19.

    slag

    September 6, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    Silly, John Cole. Don’t you know that the reason we have more fires is that we have too many trees? It’s simple. Get rid of the trees, get rid of the fires. That’s what Rush says.

  20. 20.

    gocart mozart

    September 6, 2009 at 7:58 pm

    OT but there is an ad on your masthead for a prostitute that says “First, Fearless, and Free”. Is this true? I have been looking for a free virgin prostitute for a long time. She says her name is “Ann Coulter”. I assume this is an alias; hookerism being illegal and all. I clicked the link but alas, there was no contact info. (Odd for an adult website) John or DougJ, do you have the agency’s phone number? Also, do you know if they have any whores without adam’s apples and, I don’t know how else to say this but, a less crack-whorish demeaner? Thanks in advance.

  21. 21.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    If only them Dinosaur’s had not eaten so many Twinkies.

  22. 22.

    Demo Woman

    September 6, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    60 Minutes just highlighted the LATimes reporter who wrote about Nathaniel Ayers. I saw “The Soloist” a few weeks ago and enjoyed the segment on him.

  23. 23.

    Rick Taylor

    September 6, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    Everyone knows global warming and climate change is a hoax to surrender more of your liberty to the Commie Lieberals.

    *sigh* The sad thing is, this isn’t even snark; this is pretty much what they believe. If this were the middle ages, these would be the people calling for Galileo to be condemned for arguing the earth moves.

  24. 24.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    September 6, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    I’m going to go watch the next DVD of True Blood that came yesterday. That show is like heroin. Can’t get enough. The crazies in the world will have to get along without. Hoping for Tunch and Lily pix later…or other equally cute pets.

  25. 25.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    September 6, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    I stand corrected, I’m going to FEED my cats first, and then watch my DVD. Ahem.

  26. 26.

    donovong

    September 6, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    It’s not just the western forests, either. The hemlock and pine are dying in the east, and there are numerous others that are experiencing substantial threats, including oak.

    We be fucked.

  27. 27.

    donovong

    September 6, 2009 at 8:18 pm

    By the way – did you vote for Bitsy today?

  28. 28.

    John Cole

    September 6, 2009 at 8:19 pm

    I have no idea. For some reason, I have it in my head it is tobacco money, but I would love to know who is paying the bills there.

  29. 29.

    Sly

    September 6, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    Who funds Reason anyway? Don’t tell me Koch and the other nutbags.

    Yup. Koch, Bradley, Earhart, Scaife, Olin, JM, and Smith Richardson account for pretty much all of Reason’s funding. David Koch is one of their trustees. It’s part of the Atlas Research Foundation (yes, Atlas Shrugged Atlas) which gets most of its funding from the same family foundations as well as corporate contributions from oil companies.

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Reason_Foundation

  30. 30.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 8:22 pm

    That was a sobering piece that is hard to debunk by skeptics. And anyone living in the west with half a brain cell knows things are changing rapidly. And when you consider the fire season has extended by 78 days, that bodes very bad.

    Right now the overheating, drought and megafires have shifted away from us in the SW to the north. But we just had one our driest summer rainy seasons in a while,, often an omen to a return to the high heat drought conditions that nearly burnt us all up in the early 2000’s.

  31. 31.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    @donovong:

    Yes

  32. 32.

    linda

    September 6, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    I saw so many wind turbines and solar panels in Boston recently, which surprised me. They were everywhere.

    just returned from a brief visit to des moines and having read about the wind farms in western iowa, one day my sister and i headed towards storm lake in the northwestern part of the state. driving (usually gravel) county roads and the horizon is nothing but acres and acres of very healthy corn and soybean fields and suddenly popping up are these fields of 260 ft 3-bladed towers. it’s just the eeriest looking thing to suddenly drive upon.

    another funny thing is to see semis on the interstate transporting one of those blades. they are huge.

  33. 33.

    Leelee for Obama

    September 6, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    @MikeJ: Kinsley thinks it’s OK to let a fellow history buff make a mistake and not make it right? I don’t like to let friends make mistakes they can be given a hard time about. We’uns got to stick together.

    However, this may explain why so much CW is wrong, they just don’t like to correct errors-probably how Bush the Lesser got re-elected.

  34. 34.

    gocart mozart

    September 6, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    crickets chirping . . .

    C’mon, wasn’t that a little funny guys :(

  35. 35.

    Leelee for Obama

    September 6, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    @gocart mozart: Sorry, mozart, but Ann Coulter is not in my consciousness. I see her name and move on.

  36. 36.

    John Cole

    September 6, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    LOL. It makes so much sense that Reason is just another arm of the wingnut welfare circuit. Anyone have any numbers?

  37. 37.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    @Leelee for Obama:

    Sorry, mozart, but Ann Coulter is not in my consciousness.

    Me neither, but she sometimes shows up in my nightmares.

  38. 38.

    Mike in NC

    September 6, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    Right-wing “think tanks” like Heritage Foundation are an oxymoron.

  39. 39.

    Laura W

    September 6, 2009 at 8:47 pm

    @gocart mozart:

    Also, do you know if they have any whores without adam’s apples and, I don’t know how else to say this but, a less crack-whorish demeaner?

    Sorry. I totally laughed aloud when I got to this part. Should’ve chimed in, but you know, I just thought the LOL would be assumed!

  40. 40.

    auntieeminaz

    September 6, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    @donovong: Thanks for the reminder.

  41. 41.

    gbear

    September 6, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    OT. Embedding practice for me, anda LOLcats for tunch

  42. 42.

    Laura W

    September 6, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    @auntieeminaz: @donovong:

    Yes, thanks for the reminders, and the ongoing votes, all y’all. Who knows? Maybe she still has a chance in a new week? And even if she doesn’t win this competition, I think we’ve helped in other ways “yet unseen”.

  43. 43.

    jeffreyw

    September 6, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    Hmm…

    A sorta vegan friend wants to cook something kinda complicated tomorrow. She asks me if I have any good ideas. Just throwin it out here for an assist, and thanks.

  44. 44.

    Jonny Scrum-half

    September 6, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    Boy, John Cole, you do have a large bug up your rectum about libertarians and Reason Magazine, don’t you? I don’t get it; many people with libertarian leanings (like myself) were against the invasion of Iraq before it happened, at the same time I understand you were arguing in favor of it. I appreciate that you’ve made the jump, and I like how your site exposes right-wing hypocrisy, but I would think that your questionable judgment 5 years ago might make you less sure that your current views are correct and that anyone who disagrees has got it wrong.

  45. 45.

    slag

    September 6, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    @Jonny Scrum-half: Sooo…your saying that deregulation and tax breaks for loggers is the answer, then?

    I can’t imagine why people wouldn’t take that seriously.

  46. 46.

    slag

    September 6, 2009 at 9:00 pm

    Also. Sick of freakin homonyms. Also.

  47. 47.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    @Jonny Scrum-half:

    I’m sure the glibertarians believe that only if we had more deregulation the country wouldn’t be in the pickle it’s in.

    I would really like to depend in the tooth fairy, the
    easter bunny, and the wisdom of the free market system to steer the ship of state and it’s good Citizens to do the right thing. But I’ve had enough of George W, Bush.

  48. 48.

    John Cole

    September 6, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    @Jonny Scrum-half: I have a bug up my ass for glibertarians who sat by and said nothing, or put up mild protests over egregious violations of the law, but then freak the fuck out because we would DARE to think about reforming our dysfunctional healthcare system, or who spend their days providing rhetorical cover for violent lunatics, or who freak the fuck out because we spend 1/20th of the prescription drug plan liability to stimulate the economy from the Bush wreckage.

    Yeah. Fuck them.

  49. 49.

    clone12

    September 6, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    His blog does say “consistently wrong since 2002”

    Of course, the same could be said of us all. Given the massive financial mess our awesome deregulated market got us into, shouldn’t libertarians also be a bit chastened about the absolute truth of their ideology?

  50. 50.

    Davis X. Machina

    September 6, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    Does the Pope shit in the woods?

    Nullō modō, semper cacat in latrinam propriam, sed vīdī ursōs quōsdam Missam Sanctam in basilicā Sanctī Petrī hodiē celebrantes.

  51. 51.

    joe from Lowell

    September 6, 2009 at 9:05 pm

    Reason also gets a bunch of money from the oil lobby (Marshall Institute, Road Users Alliance) and the Homebuilders Association.

    Which is why you won’t ever, ever, ever read a disparaging word about suburban sprawl zoning there, while frequently being treated to explanations of why the people who do criticize sprawl zoning are actually evil statists out steal your liberty.

    BTW, my Mac doesn’t recognize “statists” as an English word. Good. It’s not.

  52. 52.

    SiubhanDuinne

    September 6, 2009 at 9:05 pm

    I always enjoy linking to Obsidian Wings because of the kitty going all Tom Cruise in the last scene of TAPS.

    Here are a few anagrams (I had to pull up one middle name, but the rest are as we know them):

    Glenn Lee Beck : BELL NECK GENE

    Sean Hannity : INANE SHANTY

    (This one’s for Tunch) Bill O’Reilly : LILY OR LIBEL

    Roger Ailes : SERIAL OGRE

    Rupert Murdoch : OCHRE RUMP TURD

    Can you tell I’m easily amused?

  53. 53.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 9:07 pm

    @Davis X. Machina:

    I love it when you speak Latin. Don’t have a clue what it means but it adds an intellectual pinache to the bohemian goings on here.

  54. 54.

    joe from Lowell

    September 6, 2009 at 9:07 pm

    Given the massive financial mess our awesome deregulated market got us into, shouldn’t libertarians also be a bit chastened about the absolute truth of their ideology?

    One would think. In reality, they latched onto the “loans to poor people and minorities sunk the economy” line early on, and are clinging to it like a long-lost relative.

    See, the problem was too much government, not to little. Also.

  55. 55.

    RedKitten

    September 6, 2009 at 9:11 pm

    @Comrade Mary: I hear you about our political parties, and yes, all four of them are definitely shit-for-brains. All four of them need to can their leaders and make a completely fresh start.

  56. 56.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    September 6, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    @jeffreyw: A little more information and I might be able to assist. What do ya need to know?

  57. 57.

    RedKitten

    September 6, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    Oh and John?

    I think you’ll like this./a>

  58. 58.

    Sloth

    September 6, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    Given the massive financial mess our awesome deregulated market got us into, shouldn’t libertarians also be a bit chastened about the absolute truth of their ideology?

    I have come to the conclusion that libertarianism is an ideology that will simply never manage to be tried correctly. And unless it is done *just so*, it will fail. At least that seems to be the excuse.

    One does tend to wonder why such an apparently simple ideology would be so fragile, but there you have it.

  59. 59.

    RedKitten

    September 6, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    Okay, so my html was crappy, but the link still works. Good ’nuff.

  60. 60.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    September 6, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    @RedKitten: Getting any sleep? Or do you just stare at Sam all the time in wonder and amazement?

  61. 61.

    demkat620

    September 6, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    @Bad Horse’s Filly: I’m watching the marathon as we speak.

    Love. That. Show.

  62. 62.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    a Sunday Night open thread?

  63. 63.

    JK

    September 6, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    OT

    It’s not enough for the people at Powerline that Van Jones has resigned. These wankers are still upset with the NY Times and AP for being too soft in their coverage of Jones

    http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/09/024450.php

  64. 64.

    Davis X. Machina

    September 6, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    Lit. “No way. He always poops in his own john, but I did see certain bears celebrating Holy Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica today.”

  65. 65.

    dsc (Unreasonable liberal)

    September 6, 2009 at 9:19 pm

    jeffrey:

    A sorta vegan friend wants to cook something kinda complicated tomorrow. She asks me if I have any good ideas.

    slice, baste with olive oil and grill eggplants, zuchini, red peppers and onions (protabellas or button mushrooms on a skewer are also good additions). grill some cherry tomatoes on a skewer too

    slather grill-toasted french bread with pesto

    make sandwiches

    eat

    I know you said complicated–so look a a good recipe for mousaka if this simple recipe isn’t what you want.

    I LOVE summer veggies

  66. 66.

    JK

    September 6, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    OT

    A Joni Mitchell song for Glenn Beck

    Twisted
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKIQSo7JbKQ

    Long Live Joni Mitchell and Fuck Glenn Beck

  67. 67.

    jeffreyw

    September 6, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    @Bad Horse’s Filly:

    The friend is a girl? Does that help?

    She likes fish. She eats squash. And other stuff.

    I dunno, my idea of complicated is ham beans and cornbread.

  68. 68.

    Citizen_X

    September 6, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    @Jonny Scrum-half: OK then, what’s the glibertarian scheme for dealing with anthropogenic global warming? And “It’s a hoax!” and “Everybody moves inland and 20 degrees north or south” don’t count.

  69. 69.

    Max

    September 6, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    @linda: They are beautiful to see, aren’t they?

    I always smile when I see the ones outside of Palm Springs.

  70. 70.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    @JK:

    They don’t get that many fresh bones to crush, It’s not Big Dawg is still presnit, and the bimbo scanners are always turned way on. So when they do get one, they try and make it last, and when there is nothing left, they bray at the moon, or NYT’s to give them some seconds.

  71. 71.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    I think I have Dropped Word dyslexia, if that’s possible.

  72. 72.

    Keithly

    September 6, 2009 at 9:26 pm

    As Limbaugh is the leader of the conservative movement, I would only note that Limbaugh cannot be wrong, he can only be wronged.

  73. 73.

    donovong

    September 6, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    @Laura W: No problem. Anything for a puppy from up in God’s Country.

  74. 74.

    Demo Woman

    September 6, 2009 at 9:38 pm

    @jeffreyw: If she does milk products, a vegetable lasagna is always nice. She can serve a salad and garlic bread with it.

  75. 75.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    September 6, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    @jeffreyw: Alright, if she eats cheese, this is good (my cousin is vegan and doesn’t eat any dairy or fish):

    http://whats4dinnersolutions.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/farmer%e2%80%99s-market-week-menu-edition/

    or this:

    http://whats4dinnersolutions.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/thursday-night-menu-northwest/

    Exchange vegetable broth for the chicken broth and skip the bacon.

    If neither of those work for you, email me – whatsdinnersolutions [at] live [dot] com
    and I can come up with something else and email you the recipe (I’ve got a bunch of recipes not posted on my blog) or talk you through the cooking process if you’re worried. Just let me know if there are any don’ts – like dairy or shellfish, etc.

    These are very, very simple meals, but have great flavors.

  76. 76.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    September 6, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    @Bad Horse’s Filly:
    Oh, for want of an edit button:

    whats4dinnersolutions [at] live [dot] com (and you know, use @ and . )

  77. 77.

    Comrade Darkness

    September 6, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    @jeffreyw: When I feel like getting all complicated, I make Ethiopian food. This includes making the Teff injera, but if you didn’t start 10 days ahead of time to set it out to foam and get the natural yeast going, you can easily make it 3/4 self-rising flour 1/4 teff instead.

    (The main animal based ingredient in the cuisine, clarified butter, can easily be corn oil.)

    Ethiopian is my absolute favorite.

  78. 78.

    jeffreyw

    September 6, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    @Demo Woman:

    i found an eggplant lasagna from a tip by dsc above, well received and thanks

  79. 79.

    b-psycho

    September 6, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    @joe from Lowell: Well, the constant “we got your back” from the government to Wall Street whenever they take a crap in the pot doesn’t help…

    Yes, I know most of the Reason types won’t acknowledge that. That’s the problem, to them all the stuff that the government does for big business is invisible.

  80. 80.

    Sly

    September 6, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    LOL. It makes so much sense that Reason is just another arm of the wingnut welfare circuit. Anyone have any numbers?

    In terms of funding, Reason is a 501(c)(3), meaning that they have to report income and expenditures to the IRS (which is required to be made public after a certain number of years), but doesn’t have to give numbers on exactly who is giving how much. To do that, you have to go through each contributor (which is a big pain in the ass).

    This is their 2005 filing:

    http://tfcny.fdncenter.org/990_pdf_archive/953/953298239/953298239_200609_990.pdf

    As with most think tanks, most of their money comes from private donations. Most of that is probably from family foundations and corporate gifts. If you go through the trustees list of Reason, the people on it aren’t really associated with small donation, grass roots groups. Anyone here who has done any digging into the financial backing of conservative groups will undoubtedly recognize the name C. Boyden Gray. Big time insurance, commerical banking (and, formerly, tobacco) lobbyist who is pretty much the go-to-guy for conservative astroturfing. Served as White House Counsel to W. before he got appointed to Ambassador to the EU, which is probably the cushiest job on the planet.

    If I were a betting man, however, I’d wager that a disproportionate amount of donations to Reason comes from API and Exxon. Mostly a hunch, but they seem to do a disproportionate amount of work on climate change debunking.

  81. 81.

    Kirk Spencer

    September 6, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    @jeffreyw: “something complicated” is what gets me. Complication for the sake of complication, or are you trying for rich/fancy/special?

  82. 82.

    gnomedad

    September 6, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    @Citizen_X:

    OK then, what’s the glibertarian scheme for dealing with anthropogenic global warming?

    I think the general idea is that nothing global warming does to us could be worse than taxes and regulations.

  83. 83.

    Jonny Scrum-half

    September 6, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    John Cole and others — I’m not going to defend Reason specifically and everyone who calls him/herself a libertarian; there certainly are a lot of cranks/nuts/shitheads who fall into those camps. But I don’t see how you can disagree with the general idea of giving less power to government. Even if you like everything Obama’s doing, at some point (incredible as it may seem) there will be another Republican President. I don’t imagine that anyone here would be cheering the decisions made by a President Palin.

    The only way to stop or prevent abuses of power is not to give away the power in the first place. And please, don’t anyone suggest that I move to Somalia, because that isn’t a “libertarian paradise” — it’s a country that has no law, which is not the same thing.

    Finally, I haven’t seen much outcry here about the recent Afghanistan aerial bombings that killed civilians. I recall that topic being a major issue back when Bush was doing it and Obama was decrying it during the campaign. As much as I like how this site calls out Republican hypocrisy, it would be nice to see some more even-handed criticism.

  84. 84.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    September 6, 2009 at 10:01 pm

    If you want something really complicated, I have a spinach lasagna that you make completely from scratch, including the pasta. That one will test your culinary skills for sure.

  85. 85.

    Jonny Scrum-half

    September 6, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    Sly — I think that Ronald Bailey agreed a couple years ago that anthropogenic global warming was real.

  86. 86.

    Unabogie

    September 6, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    @jeffreyw:

    Jeff, for the record, dairy is not vegan. If she is really vegan, she does not eat any animal products at all. I’d clarify this before deciding, since if she does eat fish, she’s not in any way, shape or form, a vegan. And if she is vegan and you serve her dairy she’ll have nothing to eat and likely won’t appreciate it.

    Good luck!

  87. 87.

    Unabogie

    September 6, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    By the way, I am a vegan, so if you want any information, please ask.

  88. 88.

    ominira

    September 6, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    @MikeJ: One of my favorite responses to Kinsley’s piece:

    Mr Kimpley is right. Even before he was there at the Washington Mail, people paid too much attention to details.

  89. 89.

    Sly

    September 6, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    But I don’t see how you can disagree with the general idea of giving less power to government.

    If giving more power to government means less power to a private entity that is willing to profit from my suffering, I’d consider that a pretty good deal.

    I don’t imagine that anyone here would be cheering the decisions made by a President Palin.

    That’s what elections are for.

  90. 90.

    Alan

    September 6, 2009 at 10:12 pm

    From the RW stale bag of tricks, it’s the environmentalists’ fault. They don’t allow the necessary brush removal and maintenance needed to prevent fires. This, in order to save the habitat of the (fill in the blank), ie. snail darter, spotted owl, etc–global warming or climate change is junk science. :)

  91. 91.

    jeffreyw

    September 6, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    @Kirk Spencer:

    Here is the statement/question in it’s entirety: “i want to cook something complicated tomorrow but i don’t know what”

    My friend lives in Texas, and we chat, I’m in Illinois, we’ve never met.

    My take: She wishes to spend some time in the kitchen making something other than a quick meal, she wants to busy herself making a dish she has never tried.

  92. 92.

    El Cid

    September 6, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    There is no such thing as man-made global warming, it is all caused by the SUN, and no scientist has ever ever studied the Sun and tried to figure out its effects on climate, just us global warming skeptics, and also Al Gore is fat and has a big house.

  93. 93.

    jeffreyw

    September 6, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    @Bad Horse’s Filly:

    Now that’s interesting, post your recipe, please and thank you.

  94. 94.

    jeffreyw

    September 6, 2009 at 10:20 pm

    @Unabogie:

    LOL, my bad, I did say “sorta”. I was gonna say “sorta vegetarian” but my spell checker said I was spelling it wrong.

  95. 95.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 6, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    @Jonny Scrum-half:

    I consider myself having a healthy streak of libertarian and is why I love living in NM, I think the healthiest ideological place I;ve ever lived in, and that covers 8 or ten states. What I object to is Libertarianism as a full throated ideology toward a fixed ideology for governance. I don’t want the government involved any more than is necessary, but it can do things nothing else can to correct the certain excesses and failures that always befall individuals and their imperfections when left to their own devices.

    We have lived the past 30 years the model that free markets can govern itself, and have learned it can’t without some rules and enforcement of those rules that only a government can coldy and faithfully execute. And yes governments are not perfect stewards in these situations and go off the rails from time to time, especially when one party comes to power and works day and night to sabotage the agencies tasked to bring some fairness and rules. But it is what we have for the un-perfect human experience.

    And with Healthcare, it should have been painfully obvious from day one that the market cannot function as it should to provide a product that folks cannot foregoe, because they will die. It is not meant for that purpose.

    And being a civilized society, we will not let this happen and have been using desperate and costly measures by treating the uninsured by emergency that costs a fortune./

    Now we are at the inevitable place where profiteering of a vital service has brought us all to the point of HC system collapse, and only government has the wherewithall to make it right. And denying that glaring fact due to some ideological dogma is what I object to from glibertarians.

  96. 96.

    b-psycho

    September 6, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    @Jonny Scrum-half: The think-tank associated shill types have way better media access than serious skeptics of government power. Questioning the entire system tends to get you shut out, y’know?

    @Sly:

    If giving more power to government means less power to a private entity that is willing to profit from my suffering, I’d consider that a pretty good deal.

    Really? They seem to end up doing the same thing regardless. Call it crazy, but I suspect they’re in cahoots and the whole idea that the average person has control over either is a charade.

  97. 97.

    slag

    September 6, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    @Jonny Scrum-half: I’ve seen plenty of criticism here about Obama’s failures to walk back Bush-era civil liberties abuses. I’ve also seen some debate here about what the hell we’re actually doing in Afghanistan and whether or not we should be doing it.

    Nonetheless, the right/libertarian/tea party wing of this country has decided that they’re going to throw a daily temper tantrum and continue to drive the narrative that the only meaningful danger to this country is affordable healthcare and cap and trade legislation. And this is AFTER their 20-something year deregulation fetish had led to a near global economic collapse.

    I’m sorry…what was your concern again?

  98. 98.

    Ash Can

    September 6, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    I wonder how many people, right, left, or center, truly understand that fighting climate change in particular, and preserving the world-wide ecology in general, really isn’t about saving the planet and all that tree-hugging stuff? It’s about saving humans. If the other animals go, we go. If plant life goes, we go. If the air goes, we go. The planet will still be here after we’ve destroyed everything on it, including ourselves. And the living cells remaining in cockroaches and algae and viruses and whatever else remains will eventually evolve back into other life forms. And, if the planet’s lucky, there won’t be any asshole humans around on Earth 2.0 to fuck everything up again.

    But then, all these right-wingers don’t give a shit because they’re all looking forward to the Rapture, or whatever the fuck they think is their get-into-heaven-free card. Heh. Won’t they be surprised.

    Ash Can + a bottle of Stone’s Throw. (Great stuff, but it leaves me particularly unwilling to suffer fools gladly.)

  99. 99.

    Sly

    September 6, 2009 at 10:32 pm

    As for Reason and climate change, you may be right. According to ExxonWatch, it looks like Reason’s funding from them peaked in 2000-2002, when Baily was writing articles like “Global Warming and Other Eco Myths” and Kenneth Green was concern-trolling the IPCC. Since then its taken a nose dive, and probably dried up.

    But it looks like Ken Green moved to Fraser Institute (which is also funded by the same people who fund Reason) where he tried to muddy up the IPCC report in 2007 and didn’t do to well. See: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Independent_Summary_for_Policymakers

    By the way, the same thing happened to a lot of think tanks doing “independent tobacco research and policy advocacy” in the 1990s, and it appears that Reason was a part of that network as well. Think tanks cash in on certain industry messages while they can and when the money dries up they move on to something else.

  100. 100.

    MR Bill

    September 6, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    SiubhanDuinne, I will never see Rupert Murdoch’s name without thinking “OCHER RUMP TURD”.

    For Dean David Broder I got ODD REDD AVIAN REB.
    Neil Boortz (and I hope you are lucky enough to be unaware of this odious fellow’s radio career and spewing): RE:ZION BLOT;
    Megan McArdle: GAMMA CENDLER
    Ann Coulter is of course TAN NU COLER..

  101. 101.

    Sloth

    September 6, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    The only way to stop or prevent abuses of power is not to give away the power in the first place.

    Yes, I think we’re all painfully aware of that, and Obama has already walked back a lot of the abuses of power (specifically: of the constitution), that happened under Bush – and where he hasn’t, there has been a considerable hue and cry from the left.

    He hasn’t moved to prosecute those abuses of power, at least not at the highest levels, which is – arguably – exactly where that prosecution should occur. There has been a considerable hue and cry around that as well.

    As for healthcare, I see that as fixing a broken market. We could conceivable deregulate to fix this market, but there is a lot of evidence that suggests that the market would still be broken (there are large barriers to entry, it’s likely that there are large economies of scale, etc.) And, at the end of the day, we’re still probably going to distort the market anyway because we, as a society, don’t want people dying in the streets – and there is a common public health argument for providing healthcare.

    Furthermore, truly deregulating the market is likely to be simply impossible. We’ll need to break the AMA as a union and bring in more doctors, we’ll need to drop patent protection for the drug companies (or limit it severely), and we’ll probably need to force some competition into the insurance industry. All hard stuff. And quite an experiment.

    The available evidence (a host of other countries) suggests that we can get a much better solution than the one we have now by either regulating health insurance or by forcing competition on it via a public option. This is likely to be easier to implement, and the basic model has been proven out.

    Yes, there’s more government, but the alternative, if possible, amounts to a grand experiment with some very real likelihood of failure.

  102. 102.

    Sly

    September 6, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    Really? They seem to end up doing the same thing regardless. Call it crazy, but I suspect they’re in cahoots and the whole idea that the average person has control over either is a charade.

    There is some degree of collusion between government entities and private business, but this almost always happens at the state level. The risks are just too big at the Federal level when you have to deal with the IRS and Congressional subpoenas. No one wants to be dragged in front of a subcommittee of Government Reform and Oversight or Energy and Commerce and have to plead the fifth, believe me.

    State government is an entirely different matter, and on some days I flirt with the idea of removing states as an organizational entity all together. There are very few jobs that they actually do to my satisfaction, and most of the bad experiencess I’ve had, and people I know have had, with government have always come at the state and local level.

  103. 103.

    Kirk Spencer

    September 6, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    @jeffreyw: Then allow me to make two suggestions.

    Suggestion one, which is pure vegan, would be a vegetable terrine. Simplistically, it’s vegetable broth that’s gelatinized (use agar-agar for total vegan) with layers of veggies within. Veggies can be fresh or grilled. Yes, there’s more to it, but that’s the simple.

    Suggestion two is a favorite from Julia Childs’ Mastering the Art of French Cooking: Gateau de Crepes a la Florentine. It’s a layer cake – well, not really, as the layers are crepes and various veggie mixes. HOWEVER, it is not ‘true’ vegan: crepes need milk, the mushoom duxelle is properly made with cream, “You can never have too much butter”, etc. Properly it’s molded, and both beautiful and rich on completion.

    Both add the complication of being something most folk haven’t tried, so getting it right the first time (blindly flailing through ingredients) is, well, entertaining.

  104. 104.

    jeffreyw

    September 6, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    @Kirk Spencer:

    Wow, I’ll link her to your suggestion, that sounds wildly entertaining. At least as long as I stay in Illinois and just see the grumbling from Texas. lol

  105. 105.

    SiubhanDuinne

    September 6, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    @MR Bill: I love RE:ZION BLOT for Neil Boortz. Brilliant! I wish I were ignorant of him, but he got his start in Atlanta (I believe he still broadcasts from here — I haven’t listened to him in years) and I used to hear him occasionally when he was strictly a local personality, long before he had a national platform. IIRC he was a practicing lawyer and did the radio thing only as a part-time amusement. I was never a fan but he came across as fairly sane and intelligent back then. When he was being a dick, he was still a thought-provoking dick. But as I say, that was nearly 25 years ago and I’ve gone out of my way to avoid him for most of that time.

  106. 106.

    b-psycho

    September 6, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    @Sly:

    The risks are just too big at the Federal level when you have to deal with the IRS and Congressional subpoenas. No one wants to be dragged in front of a subcommittee of Government Reform and Oversight or Energy and Commerce and have to plead the fifth, believe me.

    Interesting you mention that. I seem to recall a time where oil executives were allowed to skip being sworn in — meaning they could legally lie, thus defeating the entire purpose of bringing them in at all. I also recall a distinct lack of actual punishment for the huge fuck-up on the part of the mega-bankers that was deemed threatening enough to feed their companies billions. If I’m not to interpret stuff like that as yet more proof that representative government is bullshit and politics is little more than legalized robbery, then what?

    Ideally, I’d rather have neither corporations nor government. But damn, shouldn’t politics have to actually result in some capitalists being nailed to the wall first before it gets praised as The Only Thing Standing Between Us and Them? For all the barking about the Democrats being supposedly fire-breathing soshulists by the wingnut types I kinda wish that was true so they’d have something to really bark about. You’d think the Senate majority was Bernie Sanders and 59 clones of him from the noise…

  107. 107.

    grumpy realist

    September 7, 2009 at 1:53 am

    To: Libertarians

    The reason we make snotty remarks about your moving to Somalia is because your party has (unfortunately) too many believers who hate taxes and believe The Magic Infrastructure Fairy causes stuff to appear out of nowhere and be maintained at no cost. Your devotees also have the distressing habit of ignoring all lessons from history.

    If Libertarianism was a theory that worked, we’d see a society/economy in history that used it. We don’t. And no, some city councils in Iceland back in 900 AD don’t count.

    If you don’t like government, what would you prefer instead? Warlords/mafia? City-states? (If you want the latter, I suggest you read up on the history of Renaissance Italy and the innumerable wars and fun with i banniti. Don’t forget the invasions by the French.)

  108. 108.

    Ed Marshall

    September 7, 2009 at 2:26 am

    The most screwed up part is that the libertarians I most want to identify with will tell you that they aren’t all about kicking people on welfare in the teeth and the like. They won’t have problems on the face of it with extending unemployment benefits. God forbid you for being the Hessian who would suggest that’s their M.O.

    Except it is. What do they have in common with the GOP other than that? What else is the alliance based on?

  109. 109.

    Equal Opportunity Cynic

    September 7, 2009 at 2:45 am

    @Jonny Scrum-half: You’re not alone as someone of a libertarian orientation who posts here. However I often call myself “post-libertarian” because of the general lack of pragmatism I see among libertarians, both on macro-level issues and in micro-level organization.

    Macro: I mean, for example, resisting the Keynesian economic consensus so vehemently without any consideration of the magnitude of the consequences if we guess wrong. Falling into the “Obama is evil” crowd more than engaging the debate and offering market-based solutions to the health care problem.

    Micro: I’ve been involved in two local Libertarian groups in different states, one more practically activist than the other. However, my general observation is that Libertarians would rather gather and talk blue-sky theory with each other instead of doing outreach and trying to win others to their cause incrementally. As a result, the movement never grows.

    ==
    @Citizen_X:

    I’m hardly qualified to speak for libertarians as a whole but I would think that some sort of market-based solution that reflects the true costs of environmental discussion would appeal to libertarians as well as to me. However, libs might object to the cap part of cap-and-trade, whereas it seems to me to be an essential prerequisite to cause the market to consider environmental impact. Internalize the externalities, etc. etc.

    I suppose the staunch lib view is that once environmental goods get REALLY scarce then the market will allocate them efficiently, but I distrust humans’ capacity for forward-looking rational thought enough to expect action before it’s too late.

  110. 110.

    grumpy realist

    September 7, 2009 at 3:11 am

    Equal Opportunity Cynic–Unfortunately we’ve got Easter Island and quite a few other examples to show that humans are really, really dumb about backing off from self-destructive behavior.

    Eh, so what do I know–I’m getting into the “old fart” stage of life and have found myself agreeing more and more with the aphorism that has guided most of my political philosophy: “Stupidity should hurt. Badly.”

  111. 111.

    Balconesfault

    September 7, 2009 at 4:04 am

    Next time some libertarians cite a few of their crowd opposing the invasion of Iraq … it’s time to remind them of
    the libertarian ideology at the root of our Iraq reconstruction strategy.

    In only a few months, the postwar plan to turn Iraq into a laboratory for the neocons had been realized. Leo Strauss may have provided the intellectual framework for invading Iraq preemptively, but it was that other University of Chicago professor, Milton Friedman, author of the anti-government manifesto Capitalism and Freedom, who supplied the manual for what to do once the country was safely in America’s hands. This represented an enormous victory for the most ideological wing of the Bush Administration. …

    On the other side was the usual cast of neoconservatives: Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (who lauded Bremer’s “sweeping reforms” as “some of the most enlightened and inviting tax and investment laws in the free world”), Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, and, perhaps most centrally, Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith. Whereas the State Department had its Future of Iraq report, the neocons had USAID’s contract with Bearing Point to remake Iraq’s economy: in 108 pages, “privatization” was mentioned no fewer than fifty-one times. To the true believers in the White House, General Garner’s plans for postwar Iraq seemed hopelessly unambitious. Why settle for a mere coaling station when you can have a model free market? Why settle for the Philippines when you can have a beacon unto the world?

    The Iraqi Year Zeroists made natural allies for the White House neoconservatives: Chalabi’s seething hatred of the Baathist state fit nicely with the neocons’ hatred of the state in general, and the two agendas effortlessly merged. Together, they came to imagine the invasion of Iraq as a kind of Rapture: where the rest of the world saw death, they saw birth—a country redeemed through violence, cleansed by fire. Iraq wasn’t being destroyed by cruise missiles, cluster bombs, chaos, and looting; it was being born again. April 9, 2003, the day Baghdad fell, was Day One of Year Zero.

  112. 112.

    The Other Steve

    September 7, 2009 at 8:52 am

    Are western fires the result of warming or of drought?

  113. 113.

    Sly

    September 7, 2009 at 8:53 am

    Interesting you mention that. I seem to recall a time where oil executives were allowed to skip being sworn in—meaning they could legally lie, thus defeating the entire purpose of bringing them in at all. I also recall a distinct lack of actual punishment for the huge fuck-up on the part of the mega-bankers that was deemed threatening enough to feed their companies billions. If I’m not to interpret stuff like that as yet more proof that representative government is bullshit and politics is little more than legalized robbery, then what?

    Again, this is what elections are for. Representative government requires citizens governed under the same to be the ultimate jury in cases of massive fuck-ups. That isn’t easy, but no one said it wouldn’t be. Where you have ignorant and venal people, you’ll see ignorant and venal politicians. If you think people like Michelle Bachmann or Tom Delay don’t serve the best interest of “the people”, I entreat you to go visit their constituents.

    I know its fashionable to blame “The Media” or things like gerrymandering, and that argument could probably hold water twenty or thirty years ago when access to information required the time and will to go through a FOIA request. But we live in an era where there’s ocean of information out there for anyone to look through who’s got a few minutes, internet access, and a bullshit detector that is somewhat functionable. Give me five minutes and I can find the donor list of every lobbying group in the country who hides their motives behind sweet-sounding names like “Americans for a Fair Tax Code” and “Citizens for a Sound Environmental Policy”. So can you. So can everyone else.

    I have no way of proving this, but I bet we’d be in a similar situation if we scrapped representative government and went to direct democracy.

  114. 114.

    Sly

    September 7, 2009 at 9:25 am

    On the other side was the usual cast of neoconservatives: Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (who lauded Bremer’s “sweeping reforms” as “some of the most enlightened and inviting tax and investment laws in the free world”), Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, and, perhaps most centrally, Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith. Whereas the State Department had its Future of Iraq report, the neocons had USAID’s contract with Bearing Point to remake Iraq’s economy: in 108 pages, “privatization” was mentioned no fewer than fifty-one times. To the true believers in the White House, General Garner’s plans for postwar Iraq seemed hopelessly unambitious. Why settle for a mere coaling station when you can have a model free market? Why settle for the Philippines when you can have a beacon unto the world?

    Probably the greatest story of the past ten years that few people bothered to listen to. Immunity from Iraqi law and taxation was just the opening salvo of the CPAs mission to destroy what Shock and Awe didn’t.

    My favorite story is the one about Fred Burke, who was initially tapped to head up Iraq’s Ministry of Health (or what was left of it after two wars and a decade of sanctions). Guy was an expert in public health policy, especially in post-conflict areas, who worked with Harvard, Yale, Dartmouth, Johns Hopkins, etc. Did a lot of work in Kosovo and Somalia during the 90s.

    So, of course, he had to be fired. Experts? Running shit?! No way! They replaced him with James Haveman, who had virtually no experience in public health systems administration. His first act was, and I kid you not, implementing a public anti-tobacco campaign in Baghdad.

    There was also the 24-year with no background or education in finance, who was bored with his real estate job and called up Bremer’s assistant to see if there was any work in Iraq (the two were friends). Next thing he knows, he’s running the Iraqi stock exchange.

  115. 115.

    Balconesfault

    September 7, 2009 at 10:46 am

    @The Other Steve: “Are western fires the result of warming or of drought?

    Well, climatologists have long been predicting that regionalized droughts will be a natural consequence of climate change.

  116. 116.

    b-psycho

    September 7, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @Balconesfault:
    Instead of “privatization” (more like robbery), assets that were previously held by the Iraqi government should’ve been treated as commons owned by the people that operated them. ESPECIALLY the oil: Their country, their labor, their fucking oil, and no force on earth had ANY right to change that, at all. For that reason, the kind of disobedience that Iraqis took up in situations like this I am 100% in favor of.

    Any “libertarian” that thinks imposing capitalism from above is even remotely defensible is a fucking fraud.

  117. 117.

    DougW

    September 7, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    @!gocart mozart
    Stupendous! Ann Coulter is like the toothache that you just can’t stop worrying — you know it’s going to hurt to tongue it but you just keep doing it.
    Keep up the good work.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • StringOnAStick on Saturday Night Maxwell Update (Mar 26, 2023 @ 1:40am)
  • Odie Hugh Manatee on Saturday Night Maxwell Update (Mar 26, 2023 @ 1:21am)
  • RaflW on Saturday Night Maxwell Update (Mar 26, 2023 @ 1:11am)
  • GibberJack on Saturday Music & Postcard Thread (Mar 26, 2023 @ 1:11am)
  • CaseyL on Saturday Night Maxwell Update (Mar 26, 2023 @ 12:53am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!