• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Republicans in disarray!

The words do not have to be perfect.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Take your GOP plan out of the witness protection program.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

T R E 4 5 O N

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / Green Shoots

Green Shoots

by John Cole|  September 29, 200911:34 am| 24 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Here:

Federal regulators expect bank failures to cost the deposit insurance fund about $100 billion in the next four years and the fund to fall to a negative balance this month.

That is higher than an earlier estimate of $70 billion in failure costs through 2013.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation made the projections Tuesday as its board proposed requiring banks to pay in advance an estimated $45 billion in regular insurance premiums for 2010-2012.

At this point, another 100 billion to fix the incompetence of the best and the brightest who are our banksters seems like almost chump change.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « I smell a reality show
Next Post: We are all Dan Riehl now? »

Reader Interactions

24Comments

  1. 1.

    Betsy

    September 29, 2009 at 11:36 am

    I think “green shoots” deserves an entry in the lexicon.

  2. 2.

    Morbo

    September 29, 2009 at 11:38 am

    Yum yum, eat ’em up.

    Oh, and when teabaggers start crying “socialism” when the FDIC has to dip into its line of credit with the Fed, don’t forget how over the past several years before 2007 many banks weren’t paying their FDIC premiums because the system was just that healthy. Thanks, Invisible Hand!

  3. 3.

    Morbo

    September 29, 2009 at 11:39 am

    Oh, that’s right, forgot about the moderation on “sociaIism.”

  4. 4.

    asiangrrlMN

    September 29, 2009 at 11:45 am

    A hundred billion here, a hundred billion there…that’s how realignment happens

    Oh, wait. And, I agree with Betsy. “Green shoots” deserves a spot in the BJ Lexicon.

  5. 5.

    Kay Shawn

    September 29, 2009 at 11:47 am

    Please, no more usage of the term “green shoots” !!!! Those green shoots are weeds!

  6. 6.

    Kay Shawn

    September 29, 2009 at 11:48 am

    Please, no more usage of the term “green shoots” !!!! Those green shoots are weeds!

  7. 7.

    Walker

    September 29, 2009 at 11:48 am

    Everyone should be aware that during the Bush administration, Congress did not allow FDIC to collect the insurance premiums that they were owed. The claim was that FDIC was overfunded and they did not need the money.

    Any who claims Republicans are fiscal conservatives is a moron.

  8. 8.

    General Winfield Stuck

    September 29, 2009 at 11:49 am

    At this point, another 100 billion to fix the incompetence of the best and the brightest who are our banksters seems like almost chump change.

    This was also my first thought. Wonder where the money went? Is it soshulism to make eleventy hundred millionaires now laughing their asses off splayed out on some sun soaked beach sucking down fruity drinks with umbrella stir sticks playing grabass with the local honeypots. Please weigh in MacMeghan, (or how many glibertarians does it take to screw in a dim bulb?)

    The Senate Markup on HC reform is a hoot with dems taking turns making Chuck Grassley cry like a wittle baby.

  9. 9.

    gopher2b

    September 29, 2009 at 11:53 am

    Given that these payouts are coming from insurance for which the banks paid premiums (really depositors, but you know what I mean) this isn’t really a big deal in the grand scheme of things. This is a New Deal program that worked really, really well.

  10. 10.

    Walker

    September 29, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Given that these payouts are coming from insurance for which the banks paid premiums (really depositors, but you know what I mean)

    Which was pocketed by the banks and never collected.

  11. 11.

    liberal

    September 29, 2009 at 11:57 am

    @gopher2b:
    Besides the problem that depositors might somewhat be on the hook for the premiums, there’s two additional problems:
    (1) If the bill gets really large, there’s a danger it could be passed directly onto taxpayers.
    (2) While I assume the FDIC has some mechanism to prevent moral hazzard—meaning, depository institutions which take bigger risks are charged more—I don’t have much faith that it fully addresses the problem.

    Why FDIC limits much be so huge is beyond me. Anything more than $10K per person (none of this “per account” crap) is too much IMHO.

  12. 12.

    PeakVT

    September 29, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    At this point, another 100 billion to fix the incompetence of the best and the brightest who are our banksters seems like almost chump change.

    The difference here is that when the FDIC closes a bank it takes over, and sells the operations. The existing corporate structure doesn’t get to live on and gamble another day, which is what has happened with TBTF entities like Citigroup.

  13. 13.

    Ked

    September 29, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    @Walker:

    Really want to emphasize the point Walker brought up. For most of the last decade: Banks. Didn’t. Pay. Any. Insurance. Premiums. At all. Full stop.

    So they’ve had a loan of this money for all these years, essentially, never had to pay interest on it. Sounds like a real good deal to me.

  14. 14.

    Svensker

    September 29, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    chump change

    Yup. We’r the chumps and that ain’t gonna change.

  15. 15.

    The Moar You Know

    September 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    @Walker: THANK YOU. How quickly everyone forgets.

  16. 16.

    Irrelevant,YetPoignant

    September 29, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    I love this City, this State
    This Country is too large
    And whoever’s in charge up there
    Had better take the elevator down
    And put more than change in our cup
    Or else we
    Are coming
    Up

    (cf.)

  17. 17.

    Zifnab

    September 29, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    Man, problems like this really take you back, eh?

    http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/03/11/now_needy_fdic_collected_little_in_premiums/?page=full?ref=fp1

    WASHINGTON – The federal agency that insures bank deposits, which is asking for emergency powers to borrow up to $500 billion to take over failed banks, is facing a potential major shortfall in part because it collected no insurance premiums from most banks from 1996 to 2006.

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which insures deposits up to $250,000, tried for years to get congressional authority to collect the premiums in case of a looming crisis. But Congress believed that the fund was so well-capitalized – and that bank failures were so infrequent – that there was no need to collect the premiums for a decade, according to banking officials and analysts.

    Personally, I blame the Democrats.

  18. 18.

    gopher2b

    September 29, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    @liberal:

    Why FDIC limits much be so huge is beyond me. Anything more than $10K per person (none of this “per account” crap) is too much IMHO

    You cannot be serious.

  19. 19.

    gopher2b

    September 29, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    @Walker:

    Yes, from ’96-’06 which was criminal negligence in my opinion.

  20. 20.

    The Pale Scot

    September 29, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    Rithotz’s take

    ““Repeat after me: The FDIC does not run out of cash. The FDIC does not run out of cash. FDIC can confiscate all of the net assets and earnings of all FDIC insured banks. That is trillions in total liquidity. FDIC can borrow from Treasury, the Fed and even from FDIC insured banks. They can also issue notes.””

    http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/09/why-does-bloomberg-keep-getting-the-fdic-story-wrong/

  21. 21.

    Fergus Wooster

    September 29, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Meanwhile the bigger banks (read: “too big to fail”) have regained their risk appetite, and are taking enormous loan positions ($100-200MM) in hopes of investment banking fees.

    One syndication I saw recently had credit metrics that sent all the small and mid-sized banks running as fast as they could. I mean the metrics are indefensible. This tier of banks would have been committing $25-30MM for a total loan facility of, say, $2 billion. The larger banks would have held $50MM or so.

    Instead, the smaller tier backed away, and the larger banks doubled and tripled down to $100 and $200MM pieces. Off the record, some of these bankers have admitted that the transaction does not pass a rudimentary credit test – but they just can’t pass on the potential I-banking fees.

    It starts again.

  22. 22.

    Fergus Wooster

    September 29, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    In moderation. Sad.

  23. 23.

    tc125231

    September 29, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    At this point, another 100 billion to fix the incompetence of the best and the brightest who are our banksters seems like almost chump change.

    Yeah, but the chump be us.

  24. 24.

    CalD

    September 29, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    Can we at offset some of the costs by taxing their bonuses?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • different-church-lady on Pudd’n Boots (Open Thread) (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:59pm)
  • jeffreyw on RIP Gordon Moore (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:57pm)
  • Ruckus on Pudd’n Boots (Open Thread) (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:57pm)
  • topclimber on RIP Gordon Moore (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:57pm)
  • pacem appellant on RIP Gordon Moore (Mar 25, 2023 @ 12:56pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!