• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Bark louder, little dog.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

The republican ‘Pastor’ of the House is an odious authoritarian little creep.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

When you’re in more danger from the IDF than from Russian shelling, that’s really bad.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

You cannot love your country only when you win.

Republican also-rans: four mules fighting over a turnip.

There are a lot more evil idiots than evil geniuses.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

I did not have this on my fuck 2025 bingo card.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Fight them, without becoming them!

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

I swear, each month of 2025 will have its own history degree.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / I’m just chilling like Jeff Skilling

I’m just chilling like Jeff Skilling

by DougJ|  October 13, 200911:52 am| 36 Comments

This post is in: Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

I kind of hope the Roberts gang overturns this, just so I can read about what kinds of alternative rough justice (here; here; here) the pundits will suggest:

The Supreme Court will consider throwing out the convictions of former Enron Chief Executive Officer Jeff Skilling for his role in the collapse of the one-time energy giant.

The court said Tuesday it will hear Skilling’s appeal of lower court rulings that upheld all 19 of his 2006 convictions of conspiracy, securities fraud, insider trading and lying to auditors involving the 2001 collapse of Enron.

Update. Obviously, I think Skilling belongs in jail. But I really would enjoy reading all the crazy shit the media would come up with if he walks. And, also, to be honest, I think there’s too much of an attitude of “the Enron guys got nailed, so it means our system is fine now” out there.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « So Much Suck
Next Post: By Popular Request »

Reader Interactions

36Comments

  1. 1.

    Violet

    October 13, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    I’m no pundit, but I hope they all burn in Hades. And they can DIAF to get there. I worked with Enron folks for a short while and a larger collection of egos I have never encountered – and I worked with Wall Street investment bankers during a boom. The sense of entitlement and general attitude of sh1tting on anyone below them was staggering. I have little doubt it came from the top.

    I’m sure there are some very nice folks who worked for Enron. And it stinks that they were scr3wed out of their retirement money and so forth. But after watching “The Smartest Guys in the Room” the ones I really feel for are the Pacific Lighting and Power (or whichever utitliy company it was) workers, who lost out through absolutely no fault of their own. Anyone who worked at Enron itself and had the slightest involvement in decision making…my sympathy is minimal.

    I realize I’m no pundit, so my wishing rough justice on them probably doesn’t count (and conservative pundits will never wish anything bad on their friends), but massive amounts of pain would be too good for those Enron guys. “The Smartest Guys in the Room” didn’t even begin to tell the tale of how much they thought they ran and world and how everyone owed them everything and should bow before them. They ruined people’s lives and they should pay in the most painful way possible.

  2. 2.

    Ash Can

    October 13, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    That seems like an awful lot to overthrow on the grounds of what appears to be a technicality, and according to the article it would just send him back to court, presumably with pretty much the same mountain of damning evidence against him. IANAL, but it seems to me unlikely that the Supremes’ decision to hear the case would ultimately end up with him walking (although I reserve the right to have a conniption if it did).

  3. 3.

    DougJ

    October 13, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    Honestly, I just think they belong in jail for breaking the law.

  4. 4.

    Zifnab

    October 13, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    The court said Tuesday it will hear Skilling’s appeal of lower court rulings that upheld all 19 of his 2006 convictions of conspiracy, securities fraud, insider trading and lying to auditors involving the 2001 collapse of Enron.

    What constitutional issue could possibly be in question here?

    Also, how long till we can expect the GOP to leap to the defense of poor, persecuted Enron executives?

  5. 5.

    Brick Oven Bill

    October 13, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    This again deserves to be posted, Peter Orszag, CBO, to Congress:

    Taxpayer can probably assume all of Fannie/Freddie’s risk at no cost.

    And you know that goofy looking lanky guy doing the GM commercials? This is the guy that Rahm’s Hedge Fund worked with and somehow Rahm ended up with $16 million. Whitacre is the one who said he knows nothing about cars, but is now runs General Motors. Imagine that.

    Then Axlerod got $3 million for his share of the value created by the invention of the word ‘Astroturfing’. This is such a great word, there is no way that this $3 million could have been paid to buy influence with the Administration. Axlerod is so smart.

    In contrast, Cheney got $200k and change annually in deferred compensation for his work running a large infrastructure company.

  6. 6.

    Violet

    October 13, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    And, also, to be honest, I think there’s too much of an attitude of “the Enron guys got nailed, so it means our system is fine now” out there.

    Really? The folks I know in Houston – some former Enron employees, some who worked with Enron, some who even knew the guys at the top – don’t think justice was done. Maybe I know a select group.

    Isn’t there something of an outrage about the bankers and Wall St. types who walked off with all our money? Maybe I’m the only one who’s outraged. I certainly don’t think the system is fine. It seems perpetually broken.

    I am glad that at least some of the Enron guys have had to pay. When it all happened, I figured they’d all get off scott free. At least a few haven’t.

  7. 7.

    inkadu

    October 13, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    Yeah, I’d like to here from a not IANAL; it seems really bizarre for this to be headed to the supreme court; it looks like a straightforward case.

    But Enron was close to Bush and so Skilling might have some buddies on the supreme court. I wonder who Roberts duck hunts with.

  8. 8.

    DougJ

    October 13, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    Really? The folks I know in Houston – some former Enron employees, some who worked with Enron, some who even knew the guys at the top – don’t think justice was done. Maybe I know a select group.

    No, I mean that at a national level, putting a few Enron guys in jail was made an alternative to actual corporate governance reform.

  9. 9.

    Punchy

    October 13, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    Where can I lay $5000 that this ruling is:

    1) 5-4
    2) In favor of Jeff “not Tom” Skilling

    Easiest money evah.

  10. 10.

    Dork

    October 13, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    Another Beastie ref makes this blog. Golf clap to DougJ.

  11. 11.

    Violet

    October 13, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    @DougJ:

    No, I mean that at a national level, putting a few Enron guys in jail was made an alternative to actual corporate governance reform.

    I think that that is exactly what happened. I don’t necessarily agree that people think it’s the way to solve the underlying problem. Perhaps prior to the financial meltdown in fall 2008 they thought it was okay. But that was Enron writ large. It was very obvious to anyone paying attention. Maybe I thought more people paid attention than did?

    I dunno. Maybe I’m way to optimistic about my fellow Americans’ attitudes toward stuff like that. I hope that after the latest meltdown people see that some kind of regulation is important. And clearly what we have didn’t work. Didn’t work with Enron, didn’t work with the mortgage securities stuff, won’t work with something else down the road.

  12. 12.

    Steeplejack

    October 13, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    @Dork:

    C’mon, it could just as easily be a Dr. Scholl’s ref. Jeez.

  13. 13.

    Joel

    October 13, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    Watch the “Smartest Men in the Room” and just hope that Skilling gets transferred to a Supermax for all his troubles.

  14. 14.

    Zifnab

    October 13, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    @DougJ: Nonsense, DougJ. What’s wrong with the current corporate governance system? Economy is doing just fine. I heard someone talking about DOW 36,000 for christ’s sake. How could there be any sort of problems in our system?

  15. 15.

    Napoleon

    October 13, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    @Zifnab:

    “What constitutional issue could possibly be in question here?”

    I don’t know but it could easily be something that has nothing to do with if he did what he is accused of or not. Being an attorney you have no idea how crazy it drives me how many people treat whether the court affirms or reverses a case as somehow going to the underlying factual basis of the matter.

    For example, this could be nothing more then an evidentiary issue such as (to make something up) letting certain evidence in without a live witness to give it or “authenticate” the evidence and over the years some circuit courts have said you can do it and some say you can not. So the USSC has a dispute on how to handle certain evidence it needs to resolve.

    Of course rich guys like Skilling have the money to pay attorneys to exploit issues that arise and maybe “buy” themselves a new trial, but that doesn’t really mean the court is considering “Is it unconstitutional to stop Skilling from ripping off millions of people” or something like that.

  16. 16.

    The Saff

    October 13, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    @Joel: It’s on the DVR and ready to watch. I’m sure it will piss me off.

    And in light lunchtime reading, I finally read Donald L. Bartlett and James B. Steele’s article “The Bailout, One Year Later.” Just in case you needed another reminder of how incompetent the Bush Administration was at everything it did.

  17. 17.

    Demo Woman

    October 13, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    OT Not sure if this has been mentioned but Snowe is voting for the Health Care Bill.

  18. 18.

    ricky

    October 13, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    I think Skilling deserves an extra six months for letting a major league ballpark get named for a breakfast beverage.

  19. 19.

    Mark S.

    October 13, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    Did anyone read the article? Skilling is appealing two things: some federal “honest services” statute and that he didn’t get a fair trial because of all the publicity.

    A ruling in his favor on the fair trial claim probably would result in a new trial. The effect of the ruling on honest services is unclear since Skilling was convicted on other charges as well, including securities fraud.

    It sounds like the Court is more interested in the “honest services” aspect since it is also accepted two other similar cases. My guess is that he doesn’t have much chance on the fair trial claim. So Skilling might get a reduced sentence, which he might be getting anyway: “In January, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld the convictions, but ordered Skilling’s prison term reduced.”

  20. 20.

    Zifnab

    October 13, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @Mark S.:

    Did anyone read the article? Skilling is appealing two things: some federal “honest services” statute and that he didn’t get a fair trial because of all the publicity.

    Yeah, I have no idea what the first thing is, and on the second, I didn’t think “The media was mean” was the sort of thing the SCOTUS handled on appeal.

  21. 21.

    Face

    October 13, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    Without Skilling’s illegality and thus Enron’s demise, we would have never gotten the “Women of Enron” Playboy issue, so there’s that….

  22. 22.

    Napoleon

    October 13, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    @Zifnab: said:

    “. . . I didn’t think “The media was mean” was the sort of thing the SCOTUS handled on appeal.”

    I think in the 60s they took a famous case involving Dr. Sam Shepherd (whose, oddly enough, slain wife is buried less then a mile from me) who won a reversal on basically that basis. “The Fugitive” was loosely based on his story.

  23. 23.

    baxie

    October 13, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    this is my favorite post title in a long, long time.

    Kudos Doug!

  24. 24.

    Dr. Loveless

    October 13, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    I kind of hope the Roberts gang overturns this, just so I can read about what kinds of alternative rough justice (here; here; here) the pundits will suggest

    You may laugh, but we have the luxury of abjuring violent fantasies only because rough pundits stand ready to have violent fantasies on our behalf. Or something like that.

  25. 25.

    Jay Schiavone

    October 13, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    How come nobody is suspicious about Ken Lay’s passing? He happened to die in Aspen during the off season; very easy to manage records from that location. His body was cremated; were his parents cremated? He died between his conviction and sentencing, thus he knew the deal was done, yet he was released until imprisonment. His estate argued that he could not be held liable for the losses of investors because he had an appeal pending. So many fortunate coincidences (for his estate) and such a young man. What am I saying? There’s no way a man of Ken Lay’s integrity would perpetrate such a fraud. And even if he did, there’s no way he could get the Bush administration to facilitate such a scheme. It’s not like he had anything on them. It’s not like they owed Lay anything; Enron and Lay were the biggest Bush contributors in 2000. Just a curious coincidence.

  26. 26.

    cmorenc

    October 13, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    @Napolean:

    For example, this could be nothing more then an evidentiary issue such as (to make something up) letting certain evidence in without a live witness to give it or “authenticate” the evidence and over the years some circuit courts have said you can do it and some say you can not. So the USSC has a dispute on how to handle certain evidence it needs to resolve.

    Yes, this is a valid statement about how appellate courts frequently operate. Law schools tend to be very good at training your mind to think about the abstract legal connections between things while ignoring qualitative thoughts about the things themselves.

    NEVERTHELESS there is a pronounced tendency for the current majority of the US Supreme Court to make a special exception for the vast bulk of garden-variety criminal cases, and keep foremost in mind that it’s evil low-life perps they’re dealing with, and it’s uber-important to give as much leeway and benefit of doubt to police and prosecutors as possible in order to put as many of these slimeballs away as possible without creating any needless impediments. Of course they aren’t often quite so overt about having this frame of mind, but simply bend and stretch constitutional principles and precedents to arrive with overwhelming frequency at results that amount to the same thing. OTOH, when it comes to affluent white-collar criminals from the financial or corporate sector (people they might not admire, but the type of people they can nonetheless much more easily identify with), well howdy their perspective seems uncannily prone to change into the mode where now vital legal principles are at stake to be defended that are more important than whether the result lets the perp (especially a corporate perp) down lightly or off scott-free.

    Works that way a lot over the past twenty-five years.

  27. 27.

    liberal

    October 13, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    @Napoleon:

    Of course rich guys like Skilling have the money to pay attorneys to exploit issues that arise and maybe “buy” themselves a new trial…

    This is the key point, obviously.

  28. 28.

    liberal

    October 13, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @cmorenc:

    OTOH, when it comes to affluent white-collar criminals from the financial or corporate sector (people they might not admire, but the type of people they can nonetheless much more easily identify with), well howdy their perspective seems uncannily prone to change into the mode where now vital legal principles are at stake to be defended that are more important than whether the result lets the perp (especially a corporate perp) down lightly or off scott-free.

    This.

  29. 29.

    liberal

    October 13, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    @Jay Schiavone:

    How come nobody is suspicious about Ken Lay’s passing?

    I thought lots of people were suspicious about his passing.

  30. 30.

    ET

    October 13, 2009 at 2:56 pm

    I worked at Andersen at the time of Enron – though not on that engagement – and I don’t think justice was done.

    If the 5th Circuit upheld the conviction then Skilling likely doesn’t have near as much chance at the Supreme Court as he might like. From my admittedly little knowledge, I have understood the 5th is not exactly the most “liberal” (as in the damn liberal judges) of of the courts. More Scalito less Ginsburg. Someone who knows better can speak to that than I can.

  31. 31.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    October 13, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    @Face: lmfao

  32. 32.

    Makewi

    October 13, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    @DougJ:

    No, I mean that at a national level, putting a few Enron guys in jail was made an alternative to actual corporate governance reform.

    Maybe I’m not getting what you mean by “actual corportate governance reform”, but the Sarbones-Oxley Act was passed in part due to Enron.

  33. 33.

    Janus Daniels

    October 13, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    I think that DougJ means that Sarbones-Oxley was a bandaid on a sucking chest wound.

  34. 34.

    BillCinSD

    October 13, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    and Sarbanes-Oxley will likely be made moot this fall by the SCOTUS anyway.

    and Ken Lay became innocent when he died as he had appeals left, so his death led to abatement ab initio — essentially no one should be declared guilty while appeals are still in progress

  35. 35.

    Makewi

    October 13, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    @BillCinSD:

    I’m not so sure about your SCOTUS argument, as the current courts seems inclined to side with arguments favoring compelling government interest.

  36. 36.

    Michael G

    October 13, 2009 at 11:32 pm

    Sarbanes-Oxley is why we all have to change our password every 90 days. Great, that will stop the next Enron.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - dmkingto - SF Bay Area Scenes 3
Image by dmkingto (6/18/25)

Recent Comments

  • Snowlan01 on On The Road – something fabulous – No Kings! Glendale CA (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:10pm)
  • bbleh on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:08pm)
  • Baud on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:02pm)
  • Jackie on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:02pm)
  • jonas on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:02pm)

Personality Crisis Podcast (Cole, DougJ, mistermix)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!