• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Second rate reporter says what?

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

T R E 4 5 O N

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

An almost top 10,000 blog!

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Come on, man.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

White supremacy is terrorism.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Media / You Just Can’t Handle the Truth

You Just Can’t Handle the Truth

by John Cole|  November 5, 20098:15 am| 61 Comments

This post is in: Media, Clown Shoes

FacebookTweetEmail

It has now been about 36 hours since the most definitive victory for conservatism ever, yet according to my sources, Obama is still President, the Senate still has 60 Democrats, and the House gained a Democrat.

I guess you have to live in the beltway or work for a cable network to truly understand election results.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Broderdammerung
Next Post: But How Will We Pay For It? »

Reader Interactions

61Comments

  1. 1.

    cleek

    November 5, 2009 at 8:22 am

    i, for one, am enjoying the new “conservative” rule. starting today, i’m going to start carrying a gun and using it to enforce my position that i should be exempt from paying sales taxes because i feel the Democrat “Governor” of NC was selected by the DC power brokers and their union lackeys and not the people of NC, who would never vote for a Democrat. the 2008 “election” was a sham. and i will not pay the wages of tyranny! freedom is my profession! long live good, honest Americans! down with tyrants and usurpers!

    Wolverines!

  2. 2.

    robertdsc-now with 27 championships

    November 5, 2009 at 8:25 am

    We picked up 2 Dems in the House; Owens in NY-23 and Garamendi in CA-10. Interestingly enough, both support the public option. Garamendi in particular is a heavy-duty progressive, so that’s a huge plus.

  3. 3.

    soonergrunt

    November 5, 2009 at 8:26 am

    Well, of course you don’t expect the rubes out in the hinterlands to understand, do you?

  4. 4.

    Nikki

    November 5, 2009 at 8:26 am

    @cleek:

    That was perfect! I could feel the crazy boiling up as I read it.

  5. 5.

    soonergrunt

    November 5, 2009 at 8:27 am

    John,
    You need to add the ‘good news for conservatives’ tag.
    Please tell us that there will be either an edit or preview function coming soon.

  6. 6.

    robertdsc

    November 5, 2009 at 8:28 am

    We picked up 2 Dems in the House; Owens in NY-23 and Garamendi in CA-10. Interestingly enough, both support the public option. Garamendi in particular is a heavy-duty progressive, so that’s a huge plus.

  7. 7.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    November 5, 2009 at 8:28 am

    Whatever respite we might have seen (ephemeral as it was) from the Washington Press Corpse’s usual scared-of-the-right blatherings, well, IT’S BACK!!!!!!!!

    And it won’t go away unless Dems spank the crap outta the Repups in the mid terms. Than we’ll get 4 months of “oh, well, er, um”, then, something will happen and we’ll be right back here AGAIN.

    Welcome to the corporate media of the USofA for the rest of our stinkin’ lives.

  8. 8.

    El Cid

    November 5, 2009 at 8:28 am

    Pshaw, everyone knows that in 2009 the key political seats for the direction of the entire nation are the NJ & VA governors, which were captured by Republicans and so this therefore means AMERICA HAS RISEN AGAINST THE OBAMA-PELOSI RADICAL AGENDA.

    However, for various reasons this did not apply in 2001 when George W. Bush was in office and Democrats won both those seats, because, well, there was weather, or something, and so at that time it meant that AMERICA STILL STRONGLY SUPPORTED THE REPUBLICAN AGENDA WHICH WILL BE A PERMANENT REPUBLICAN MAJORITY.

    Now, had NY-23 been won by the Conservative candidate and had Democrats won both the NJ and VA governors’ races, the same thing would still be true: AMERICA HAS RISEN AGAINST THE OBAMA-PELOSI RADICAL AGENDA.

    President Snowe should immediately empower a blue ribbon commission of sensible centrist commentators such as David Broder, David Brooks, Chris Matthews, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Hugh Hewitt to chart us a government of national reconciliation.

  9. 9.

    Brian J

    November 5, 2009 at 8:28 am

    Well, finally, a statement of truth from the Republicans on health care. In the middle of an article about the fact that the House Republican health care form bill would extend coverage to only 3 million people, we read:

    House Republicans, including their leader, Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, have said that they did not intend for their legislation to expand insurance coverage, because they viewed that goal as unaffordable. Instead, they said the bill was tailored narrowly to reduce costs.

  10. 10.

    Brian J

    November 5, 2009 at 8:29 am

    @El Cid:

    I wasn’t with you until you mentioned a blue ribbon commission. That changes everything.

  11. 11.

    Ash Can

    November 5, 2009 at 8:31 am

    @robertdsc-now with 27 championships: Didn’t Garamendi replace Ellen Tauscher? She was a Dem, albeit a more conservative one than Garamendi. Hence John’s correct — a gain of one Dem in the House.

  12. 12.

    Fulcanelli

    November 5, 2009 at 8:31 am

    It’s TWO new Dems, amirite?. It’s a conspiracy. The Glorious Revolutionary Republic of New England purge of Congressional Republicans is creeping westward.

    Now if we can only get rid of Lieberman.

  13. 13.

    The Grand Panjandrum

    November 5, 2009 at 8:32 am

    But the RINO lost, so there!
    @robertdsc: Dems had a net gain of one. The NY-23 seat switched parties but the CA-10 seat didn’t change hands, although Tauscher was a more moderate Dem and Garamendi ran on a fairly progressive message. But that just means its great news for John McCain and the Republicans.

  14. 14.

    gnomedad

    November 5, 2009 at 8:33 am

    I am often slow on the uptake, but NPR interviewed a Republican pollster this morning who explained why Obama needs to be more bipartisan and I nearly glimpsed my brain from rolling my eyeballs. Go liberal media!

  15. 15.

    Fulcanelli

    November 5, 2009 at 8:37 am

    @Brian J:

    House Republicans, including their leader, Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, have said that they did not intend for their legislation to expand insurance coverage, because they viewed that goal as unaffordable. Instead, they said the bill was tailored narrowly to reduce LOBBYING costs.

    Fixt it for ya.

    Bring out yer dead…
    …but I’m not dead yet!

  16. 16.

    Bob (Not B.o.B.)

    November 5, 2009 at 8:38 am

    The real good news is that politicos tend to believe their own crap. In the end the R’s wil actually see those two elections as a repudiation of the Obama agenda and run farther to the right.

    Fine with me.

  17. 17.

    Leelee for Obama

    November 5, 2009 at 8:39 am

    My question here is this: Does anyone who voted for Christie think that lowering property taxes is going to improve anything in the way of public services? Or so they want private roads and electricity and water and all that stuff? Will paying a private utility for these things cost less? Methinks not-profit margins and all that. Jon Corzine was no thrill, but Christie will get impeached when the ramifications start ramifacating, as they will. Virginia was not given much of a choice in Creigh Deeds, from what I’ve read; too bad, but McDonnell will find himself unpopular with Indies soon enough, he’s not the centrist they think they voted for.

    Nancy Pelosi made out well in this election cycle, and that’s gonna chap more than one butt, and that’s a fact.

    The media are not to be listened to-they are just noise.

    Maine is the most diappointing result, becaue it means we really will need a Constitutional Amendment to get the job done, and that may be impossible until more families admit that their GLBT members deserve the same rights as everyone else.

  18. 18.

    gnomedad

    November 5, 2009 at 8:41 am

    @Fulcanelli:

    Bring out yer dead…but I’m not dead yet!

    Heehee, an amusing metaphor for the RINO purge.
    “Look, do us a favor …” WHAM!

  19. 19.

    El Cid

    November 5, 2009 at 8:42 am

    @Leelee for Obama: It’ll be like California. Locals will scream both for all their taxes to be lowered and for the state to spend a lot more on building and repairing highways and such.

  20. 20.

    Brian J

    November 5, 2009 at 8:50 am

    @Leelee for Obama:

    I didn’t really pay much attention to the details of the Corzine-Christie race, but I’m going to try to keep up with what’s happening once Christie starts trying to implement his agenda. I’m curious, does New Jersey not have a balanced budget requirement? If it does, how does he plan to cut taxes without drastically reducing services?

    In some sense, I’m going to view this as a hint to what might happen if a lot of Republicans get their way.

  21. 21.

    R-Jud

    November 5, 2009 at 8:52 am

    @El Cid:

    [New Jersey will] be like California. Locals will scream both for all their taxes to be lowered and for the state to spend a lot more on building and repairing highways and such.

    My anecdotal evidence (consisting mostly of the ravings of/ mass e-mail screeds from a few dozen wingnut relatives in Monmouth County) suggests that this analysis is spot on.

  22. 22.

    Leelee for Obama

    November 5, 2009 at 8:53 am

    @Brian J: Yupper! Not sure about the balanced budget situation in NJ. Doesn’t matter anyhoo, no money, no services, pissed off citizens-QED.

  23. 23.

    kay

    November 5, 2009 at 8:57 am

    @Leelee for Obama:

    I think Jon Corzine shouldn’t have promised to lower property taxes. It’s a cheap way to get a vote, and it doesn’t make any sense, and he knows better, or should.
    Why would he make such a stupid promise? What was he basing that on? I can’t help but make a Goldman connection with that. It’s a predictive fantasy.
    Anyone who says they are going to cut taxes should have to produce a list of services they’re cutting, or where they’re getting the money.

  24. 24.

    Brian J

    November 5, 2009 at 9:00 am

    @kay:

    Do you think he would have won if had promised to mail every man, woman, and child in New Jersey a check based on his Goldman Sachs fortune? I sometimes wonder.

  25. 25.

    Michael

    November 5, 2009 at 9:15 am

    [New Jersey will] be like California. Locals will scream both for all their taxes to be lowered and for the state to spend a lot more on building and repairing highways and such.

    Spending on those hated “others” is the culprit, y’know.

  26. 26.

    Leelee for Obama

    November 5, 2009 at 9:17 am

    @Brian J: That would probably have turned out less expensive than the amount of money he spent on his two election cycles. Not for nothing, but politicians need to show their Pay-Go plans like kay said. that’s the only way the voters know what a tax cut will cost them in the long run.

  27. 27.

    kay

    November 5, 2009 at 9:25 am

    @Brian J:

    He’s perpetuating this myth that things are free. I actually resent that, on a national political level. For God’s sake. His opponent is selling the same BS. Thanks, Jon.
    We don’t have enough conservatives pretending they can offer elaborate services with no taxes? He had to join that bandwagon? Did he say the tax cuts were going to lead to larger revenue with no cuts in services because it would be a smaller slice of a bigger pie, too?
    He deserved to lose just for that.

  28. 28.

    Chad N Freude

    November 5, 2009 at 9:27 am

    @gnomedad: The pollster is correct. Assuming, of course, that bipartisan means giving into Republicans on every issue.

    You want proof? Well, we have this in this morning’s LA Times:

    Now, as the entire House of Representatives and a third of the Senate prepare for next year’s midterm elections, some moderate Democrats are wondering whether they can afford to follow President Obama’s ambitious legislative agenda on such controversial issues as healthcare and climate change. One said the results were a “wake-up call.”
    __
    “There are going to be a lot more tensions between the White House and Congress,” predicted Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), a member of the Blue Dog Coalition of fiscally conservative Democrats. “They’ve been under the surface so far — and they’re going to come out in the open.”
    . . .
    Ironically, those same exit polls indicate that Obama remains relatively popular with voters, even among those who chose Republican candidates Tuesday.
    __
    But “lesser mortals need to be worried about their independent voters,” Cooper said, “because they have shifted strongly against Democrats in recent months. Independent voters tend to look at the issue, not the party, and they don’t like a lot of what Congress has done.”
    __
    Whit Ayres, a Republican pollster, said that Democrats such as Cooper had reason to be nervous.
    __
    “Republicans won independents by 2 to 1. It was overwhelming. It was breathtaking,” Ayres said. “That is a huge shift since the last two elections in a very short amount of time.”

    Short version: A blue dog from TN and a Republican pollster have achieved bipartisanship.

  29. 29.

    Leelee for Obama

    November 5, 2009 at 9:35 am

    short version: A blue dog from TN and a Republican pollster have achieved bipartisanship

    And Broder is displaying that rictus grin of his in approval. Blarrgh!

  30. 30.

    Chad N Freude

    November 5, 2009 at 9:36 am

    @Leelee for Obama:

    Maine is the most diappointing result, becaue it means we really will need a Constitutional Amendment to get the job done

    I thought we already had one.

    BTW, I think the phrase “get the job done”, unless used ironically or used by a boss to a worker in reference to a particular task, is an offense against the English language. Not to be pedantic or anything.

  31. 31.

    Chad N Freude

    November 5, 2009 at 9:41 am

    [New Jersey will] be like California. Locals will scream both for all their taxes to be lowered and for the state to spend a lot more on building and repairing highways and such.

    And on deporting illegal aliens who steal jobs building roads and such from citizens.

  32. 32.

    Paul

    November 5, 2009 at 9:50 am

    @gnomedad: That was Mike Murphy on NPR in re: Obama’s need to be more bipartisan, and it was a statement so blindingly stupid — and therefore unchallenged by the interviewer, of course — that it caused me to sit up in bed and shake my head in wonder.

    And Mike is normally one of the sane ones.

  33. 33.

    Leelee for Obama

    November 5, 2009 at 9:55 am

    @Chad N Freude: You’re right, of course, that the Equal Protection Clause is the correct citing-however, I think something that over-turns DOMA is what is needed. Something really specific, that can’t be called vague or open to interpretation. Sorry about the phrase you don’t like, but since law-making is like making sausage, in the vernacular, it seemed apropos.

  34. 34.

    Chad N Freude

    November 5, 2009 at 10:01 am

    @Leelee for Obama: What turned me off to the phrase was it’s incessant use by the Bush administration (and Bush in particular) in referring to the war in Iraq. As in, per the thread above this one, “we need another $130 to get the job done”.

  35. 35.

    Chad N Freude

    November 5, 2009 at 10:02 am

    @Chad N Freude: That should have been $130 BILLION. Where have all the Edit buttons gone, long time pa-a-ssing?

  36. 36.

    Seanly

    November 5, 2009 at 10:11 am

    @gnomedad:

    As a Murphy, I apologize for the idiot polster named Murphy they had on NPR. He seriously listed every idiot talking point we’ve been laughing over – nation’s moving center-right; Obama-Pelosi are pinko failures, Christie and O’Donnell are the new face of conservatism. He did neglect to mention how the GOP fiasco at NY-23 was a victory for the GOP & conservatism.

    To top it off, the next item was a fluff piece on Carly Fiorina’s run for CA Senator. Unfortunately, I had arrived at work and was not able to listen to them describe how the miserable failure of a CEO would be the bestest Senator (after McCain, Holy Joe and President Snowe).

  37. 37.

    Fulcanelli

    November 5, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Various conservative republicans have joked in the past how “bipartisanship is date rape”. Of course, they were in power then so it was ‘different’. Now that they’re out it’s the ‘right’ thing to do.

    Yeahhhh, NO.

    Bipartisanship with the current pack of twisted fucks calling themselves conservative republicans would amount to rendition and torture.

    Wingnut anti-logic is the mindkiller. Just say no.

  38. 38.

    Waynski

    November 5, 2009 at 10:36 am

    @ Leelee for Obama — Just to clarify on NJ, every state and local government is required to balance their budgets. Only the Federal government can run a deficit, so my guess is Christie will screw up the state even worse than it is already in a hurry.

  39. 39.

    Elizabelle

    November 5, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Gail Collins had an excellent NYT column on this subject today.

    Hark! The Voters Speak!

    “In Ohio, citizens marched to the polls on Tuesday and voted to allow gambling casinos in the state. This was a obviously a message to President Obama that independent voters are not happy with the way the health care bill is going. …

    We have a dramatic saga story line brewing here, and I do not want to mess it up by pointing out that Obama’s party won the only two elections that actually had anything to do with the president’s agenda. Those were the special Congressional races in California and upstate New York. But obviously they reflect only a very narrow voter sentiment, since one involved a district that was safe for the Democrats and the other a district that had not been represented by the party since 1872. …”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/opinion/05collins.html

  40. 40.

    Elizabelle

    November 5, 2009 at 11:37 am

    I’m in moderation!

    And quite the moderate person already.

  41. 41.

    sloan

    November 5, 2009 at 11:37 am

    Michael Barone weighs in with a post-election column that avoids any mention of the congressional races. He insists the state-level races have national implications and the national races, well, uh, NY-23? Never heard of it!

    Final verdict:

    The 2009 election results are certainly not going to make it easy for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to round up the needed 218 votes for Democrats’ health care bills.

    This is excellent news for Red State.

  42. 42.

    Garrigus Carraig

    November 5, 2009 at 11:40 am

    @El Cid: Years ago, Fred Grandy (R-Iowa, Gopher on The Love Boat) said his constituents wanted “Cadillac answers at Studebaker prices.” Good times.

  43. 43.

    trollhattan

    November 5, 2009 at 11:57 am

    So I wasn’t the only one who had his pulse rate shoot up listening to Murhpy this a.m. He’s better spoken than his bwaain-munching cohorts but spews the same dreck: It’s Obama’s partisan bed, let him lie on it as the nation steams in anger.

    Not a peep about the NY-23 fratricide. Admittedly, as go the NJ and that state whose name I can’t quite recall governorships, so goeth the Nation.

    Here on the left coast I’m getting all extited about Carly who, I’m told, is going to be trouble for Boxer because she’s a GRRRRL! Printer ink dizcounts for EVERYONE.

  44. 44.

    Luthe

    November 5, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    The problem with NJ (as gleaned from my reading of an NY Times Magazine article on the matter) is that homeowners are presented with one property tax bill that is the total of all taxes owed to their local municipalities, school districts, fire departments, etc, plus the state taxes. So they whine to the state for relief, falsely believing it is the state that is bleeding them dry. If they got separate bills, or bills with the taxes broken down line-by-line, it would become clear that it is the local governments that cost them more than the state. Which I hope would encourage consolidation by said governments, but then, I have Views of the wisdom of having local governments controlling things like school funding and planning decisions.

  45. 45.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    November 5, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    Paul Kane was in fine wanktastic form this morning. I’m betting at least one of the questions was from Doug.

    Kane’s turned into a classic WaPo political reporter: head up his ass.

  46. 46.

    batgirl

    November 5, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    @gnomedad: I heard it too, or I should say, I heard the parts I could when I wasn’t screaming out loud at the radio in my car. It was Mike Murphy saying that the Dems are not playing nice, that the lack of bipartiship is all Obama’s fault (It is Obama that is making the GOP the party of NO, don’t cha know?) Inskeep didn’t mention NY-23, didn’t talk to a Democratic strategist to get a “balanced” perspective and best of all did one of those “the races really don’t forecast anything but let’s pretend they do.” I was looking to see if the transcript is up yet so I could get the exact wording (It was beautiful) but I don’t see one yet.

  47. 47.

    batgirl

    November 5, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @Paul:

    and therefore unchallenged by the interviewer,

    That interviewer was Steve Inskeep and he never challenges Republicans, only Democrats. Okay, maybe never, but pretty damn close.

  48. 48.

    Zuzu's Petals

    November 5, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @trollhattan:

    Ditto on Mike Murphy. Don’t forget this is the genius who put Schwarzenegger in office.

  49. 49.

    Frank West

    November 5, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    If you look at the comments on NPR below the story (last I checked) were over-whelmingly noting what is being discussed here. NPR keeps on trumpeting it’s objectivity… they may not be far from asking to borrow Fox’s “Fair & Balanced”mantra, while ignoring some important points. 20% (or so) of Americans identify themselves as Republican. And yet (according to some), they routinely seek commentary from more Republicans than Democrats/Independents on the various issues.

    It goes a bit like this: “Obama says that global warming is a serious issue that demands our attention. Let’s hear what three Republicans think about that!”

    Their smug ombudsman (Alicia Shepard) keeps insisting on their objective and balanced approach to reportage. It’s startin’ to make me sick!

  50. 50.

    gizmo

    November 5, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Tauscher was such a bad Democrat that I think we effectively picked up another Democrat in the House with Garamendi.

  51. 51.

    Leelee for Obama

    November 5, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    @Zuzu’s Petals: In all fairness, and not to defend Murphy, surely a few other people voted for the Governator? That being said, I haven’t listened to NPR in a couple years, just due to what is being described here. National and public it may be, but objective? Hells no.

  52. 52.

    Truthseeker

    November 5, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    I for one am delighted that Republicans won. I sincerely hope that they will move to end Social Security and Medicare and also to remove the evil teachings of evolution from our schools and reestablish the flat earth FACT.

  53. 53.

    Truthseeker

    November 5, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    @Brian J:

    Very good analysis. What those liberals dont understand is that we Republicans can carry two separate but conflicting ideas in our heads at the same time without the senseless need to be logically consistent.

  54. 54.

    Steaming Pile

    November 5, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    @comrade scott’s agenda of rage: The majority in the House will probably contract somewhat – I predict around five seats – in the 2010 midterms, and while the Senate gains three Democrats (net) and punts its milquetoast majority leader in a primary challenge, the blathering classes will still herald the event as a massive resurgence of conservatism.

  55. 55.

    Egypt Steve

    November 5, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    We ain’t got 60 Democrats. Never did. Time to face up to that. Throw Traitor Joe over the side. Then, let’s blow up the filibuster with the nuclear option. Better off without it, and we can get some shit done.

  56. 56.

    Chuck Butcher

    November 5, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    @Egypt Steve:

    blow up the filibuster with the nuclear option.

    We do recall the {R} attempt to do away with it under GWB don’t we? We do remember why we thought having it was important? Are we now postulating a “permanent majority”?

  57. 57.

    batgirl

    November 5, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    Morning Edition transcript is finally up with Steve Inskeep’s interview of Mike Murphy. This is Inskeep’s intro:

    And I’m Steve Inskeep. Good morning. The governors’ elections in New Jersey and Virginia came just before a big debate in Congress. Republicans won victories just before the full House considers health care plans. Strictly speaking, one news event has absolutely nothing to do with the other. But politicians are always alert to who’s winning elections and who’s losing. We talked about this with long time Republican strategist Mike Murphy. [emphasis mine

    Asshole

  58. 58.

    PaulW

    November 5, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    The media pundits are STILL getting it wrong. We voters haven’t risen up against either Obama or Palin. We’re rising up against Michael Bay doing another godawful Transformers movie.

  59. 59.

    Stan

    November 5, 2009 at 11:16 pm

    “An often repeated tale of Reagan’s radio days recounts how he delivered “play-by-play broadcasts” of Chicago Cubs baseball games he had never seen. His flawless recitations were based solely on telegraph accounts of games in progress.”
    — http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/presidents/40_reagan/reagan_early.html

    The secret of success is to tell people the stories they already know and make them seem fresh and new. People don’t want the truth; they want something that feels authentic. The savvy reporter knows this instinctively. That’s why they call their reports “stories.”

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Mario Piperni dot Com » Blog Archive » The Election Aftermath says:
    November 5, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    […] bit of sarcasm from John Cole… It has now been about 36 hours since the most definitive victory for conservatism ever, yet […]

  2. Rashtrakut » Blog Archive » More election night spin and fallout says:
    November 5, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    […] Cole struggles to understand the math of the Republicans and the media […]

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Argiope on The Devil has been Busy… (Mar 21, 2023 @ 5:19pm)
  • Sister Golden Bear on The Devil has been Busy… (Mar 21, 2023 @ 5:18pm)
  • eversor on The Devil has been Busy… (Mar 21, 2023 @ 5:17pm)
  • WaterGirl on The Devil has been Busy… (Mar 21, 2023 @ 5:13pm)
  • schrodingers_cat on Tuesday Midday Open Thread (Mar 21, 2023 @ 5:13pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!