• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

Fundamental belief of white supremacy: white people are presumed innocent, minorities are presumed guilty.

Bark louder, little dog.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

I like political parties that aren’t owned by foreign adversaries.

Republicans cannot even be trusted with their own money.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

If ‘weird’ was the finish line, they ran through the tape and kept running.

The current Supreme Court is a dangerous, rogue court.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

We’re watching the self-immolation of the leading world power on a level unprecedented in human history.

Petty moves from a petty man.

75% of people clapping liked the show!

’Where will you hide, Roberts, the laws all being flat?’

“But what about the lurkers?”

He really is that stupid.

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

Hey hey, RFK, how many kids did you kill today?

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Media / The lifecycle of a barnacle

The lifecycle of a barnacle

by DougJ|  November 20, 200912:52 pm| 75 Comments

This post is in: Media, General Stupidity, Good News For Conservatives

FacebookTweetEmail

John and I were just discussing Chuck Todd’s unbelievably idiotic tweet defending McCain’s latest primary-induced flip-flop. Todd’s an idiot, but not as dumb as Howie Kurtz — was John’s take on it. Mine is that neither Todd nor Kurtz is dumb in the usual sense. To stay in the good graces of elite media is simple — just keep saying everything is good news for conservatives, that we are a center-right nation, that John McCain is a principled maverick and so on. Criticize the Iraq war and you get shit-canned — ask Ashleigh Banfield or Phil Donahue. Any reporter interested in having a cushy, high-paying gig for the rest of his or her life would be foolish not to keep repeating the Village-approved talking points.

It really is that simple.

I realize that, per Forrest Gump, one could argue that stupid is as stupid does. And obviously, saying things that aren’t true, making incorrect predictions, etc. is in some sense stupid. So I see that point.

Here’s how I look at it: once a barnacle finds a good rock to attach itself to, the barnacle eats its brain, because it doesn’t need the brain anymore. The barnacle would be stupid not to eat its own brain. The same applies to Chuck Todd, Ben Smith, Mike Allen, Howie Kurtz, etc.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread
Next Post: Music To My Ears »

Reader Interactions

75Comments

  1. 1.

    Christian

    November 20, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    What an excellent summary of modern mainstream media culture.

  2. 2.

    Athenae

    November 20, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    They’re not just dumb, they’re lazy. Laziness accounts far more easily than political or even class bias for most of the “stick to the established narrative”-ness in the news. After all, if you have the shortcut already, why bother to learn anything more or explain it to people?

    A.

  3. 3.

    FlipYrWhig

    November 20, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    Your theory _really_ explains Mike Barnicle.

  4. 4.

    bago

    November 20, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    Concise.

  5. 5.

    The Grand Panjandrum

    November 20, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    They also get a premium health insurance plan. They’ll need it. Most of them need to have a plexiglass stomach surgically implanted so they can see out every time they get their head up their ass. And from what I read that is a rather common occurence.

    It really is a shame about Todd because he is very good at analyzing voting return data. Probably as good at it as anyone I’ve ever watched.

  6. 6.

    Jill (aka jwh186)

    November 20, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    And evangelicals. If the bible dictates what you think and how you live you have no need for reality, facts or critical thinking. It all just gets in the way.

  7. 7.

    Morbo

    November 20, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    Olbermann Olbermann Olbermann, nanner nanner nanner.

    /troll

  8. 8.

    Ugh

    November 20, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    So are Olbermann and Maddow just figments of my imagination then?

  9. 9.

    Ugh

    November 20, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Though I guess maybe they are not in the “good graces of elite media” so they wouldn’t count.

  10. 10.

    jibeaux

    November 20, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Ugh, you just had to make me think of that Hannibal Lecter / Ralph Fiennes scene, didn’t you, right after lunch.

  11. 11.

    El Cid

    November 20, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    Hey, you forgot to simultaneously insult leftist conspiracy theorists with their boring descriptions of corporate machinations and media cultures favoring the interests of the powerful through the ordinary workings of enculturation, hiring, promotion, and firing. Usually that’s what I see and hear alongside such frustrations. It’s de rigeur, and helps to prove you’re not a moonbat.

  12. 12.

    Elizabelle

    November 20, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    OT. This might make John happy after such a soggy day yesterday.

    NYTimes: Ohio Sues Credit Rating Agencies (Reuters report)

    Ohio’s attorney general sued Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch Ratings on Friday, asserting that they provided misleading credit ratings that led to hundreds of millions of losses for state funds.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/business/21ratings.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1258740011-hbt8UY4FMQ+skDXHq9Q/aQ

  13. 13.

    kay

    November 20, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    OT, but someone has to Tweet John Cole and tell him his long-wished for complaint has finally been filed:

    ” Ohio’s attorney general sued Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch Ratings on Friday, asserting that they provided misleading credit ratings that led to hundreds of millions of losses for state funds.
    The official, Richard Cordray, filed the lawsuit in United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on behalf of five Ohio funds that assert they lost more than $457 million because of “false and misleading ratings” of mortgage-backed securities by the ratings agencies.”

  14. 14.

    ThresherK

    November 20, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    Without reading carefully I thought that was “Criticize the Iran war and you get shit-canned…”

    Or am I reading tomorrow’s truths today?

  15. 15.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    November 20, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    So are Olbermann and Maddow just figments of my imagination then?

    No but then, neither is based outta DC. Neither has spent any time there as a reporter/journalist/stenographer. That explains one main difference since as best I can tell, anyone who’s there for any amount of time always turns into what we’re hating right now.

    Perhaps not Helen Thomas but I never liked her even when she was cogent since she’s always come across as a reporter who’s extremely taken with herself.

    The thing is, we can shriek all we want, it won’t change how the current crop of asshats do bidness. I know from talking to a current member of the WH Press Corpse that while they do *hear* our shrillness, they *always* chalk it up to the “shrill left, therefore, it can be ignored”.

    And yet, their editors are scared shitless of the “shrill right” and, according to this reporter, it’s the editors that lean heavily on the reporters in terms of what they report on and how they couch it.

    The system is rotten but then we all knew that.

  16. 16.

    El Cid

    November 20, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Via Wonkette: get ready for Tea Party: the Documentary History of the 2nd American Revolution of 2009.

    Well, at least they’re not given to hyperbole. Ever.

  17. 17.

    Ugh

    November 20, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    comrade scott’s agenda of rage – that’s a good point.

  18. 18.

    Zifnab

    November 20, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    Here’s how I look at it: once a barnacle finds a good rock to attach itself to, the barnacle eats its brain, because it doesn’t need the brain anymore. The barnacle would be stupid not to eat its own brain. The same applies to Chuck Todd, Ben Smith, Mike Allen, Howie Kurtz, etc.

    If history has proved anything, it has proved that you can maintain stellar ratings by just monotoning the same idiotic gibberish over and over and over again, without making any attempt to distinguish yourself from the large crowd of like-minded bleating sheep.

    That’s why FOX News has been hemorrhaging ratings by constantly moving right, MSNBC’s worst rating hours are hosted by left wing Maddow and Olbermann, and CNN is proudly leading the pack with the stellar mindless moderate Wolf Blitzer.

  19. 19.

    aimai

    November 20, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    Woah. Harsh. But so, so true.

    aimai

  20. 20.

    Ash

    November 20, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    Barnacles really eat their own brains!? I don’t know why that sort of terrifies me.

  21. 21.

    Darius

    November 20, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    They’re not just dumb, they’re lazy. Laziness accounts far more easily than political or even class bias for most of the “stick to the established narrative”-ness in the news. After all, if you have the shortcut already, why bother to learn anything more or explain it to people?

    Eh, laziness may explain why the mainstream media prefers “narratives”, but it doesn’t explain why the mainstream media always chooses to run with the right-wing narrative.

    I think Doug’s right – they do it to curry favor with their fellow Villagers.

  22. 22.

    kommrade reproductive vigor

    November 20, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    Exactly. Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by a desire for a paycheck.

    @Athenae: This. Also.

  23. 23.

    El Cid

    November 20, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    @Darius: Thank you. There is no random falling of the incompetent — the incompetent accidentally fall overwhelmingly on the economic rightist / hawk side of the issues.

  24. 24.

    Joel

    November 20, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    I thought this was a reference to Mike Barnicle, and how you can keep your cushy Village position, even when you’re a plaigarist and a douchebag, to boot.

  25. 25.

    Midnight Marauder

    November 20, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    Any reporter interested in having a cushy, high-paying gig for the rest of his or her life would be foolish not to keep repeating the Village-approved talking points.

    I think you make a fantastic point, DougJ. But nonetheless, Chuck Todd has transformed into an inane ignoramus of the highest degree. And I think you’re barnacle brain eating theory is the best explanation I’ve heard thus far about why Chuckie T. has morphed into such a dolt in his post-election role.

    Every tweet he posts is apparently another delicious morsel out of his intellect.

  26. 26.

    Punchy

    November 20, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    DougJ, good analysis, but you’ve left out a HUGE cog in the machinery. My take is that journalistic Darwinism should evolve the species of reporter who speaks the truth, uncovers the lies, and in general, stands out. This would elevate him/her above the others, and as we all know, whether the blog comments are positive or negative, blog comments at all “show” that reporter is someone.

    So what’s putting the kibosh on development of such a rogue reporter, like the muckrackers of past? CORPORATE MEDIA ownership. Corps prefer lower taxes (Republican mantra), less regulation (Republican tenet), monopolistic practices for price fixing (Republican…), etc.

    So it’s not just an individual’s desire to fit into this nebulous “Village” you describe. It’s that they’re all shackled by their employers to support the R cause to the detriment of the D’s policies.

  27. 27.

    low-tech cyclist

    November 20, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    Here’s how I look at it: once a barnacle finds a good rock to attach itself to, the barnacle eats its brain, because it doesn’t need the brain anymore. The barnacle would be stupid not to eat its own brain. The same applies to Chuck Todd, Ben Smith, Mike Allen, Howie Kurtz, etc.

    Best, and funniest, explanation I’ve ever read of why the Village is the way it is.

    Thanks for bringing a grin to my Friday, Doug.

  28. 28.

    Jason B at Work

    November 20, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    This is going to sound like a defense of bad journalistic behavior when it is not. But you really can’t overestimate the tendency one has to trust the response one has to one’s own surroundings. It is easy for me to imagine that, given the social circles that these guys frequent, the country would indeed appear to be center-right. Hell, if I was a complete cultural newbie having been randomly dropped into Augusta, GA (my current hometown, for better or worse), I could only assume that the country is hard-right. And I’ll be honest with you: even though I’m not a total cultural idiot and highly value John Cole’s blog and other more left-leaning sites, for the most part it’s not very real to me. Sure, you people all exist, and I’m grateful (sometimes this is all the keeps me from going crazy considering where I live), but the evidence of my eyes proclaims more than anything else that you exist in a vacuum. It’s possibly some counter-intuitive side-effect of evolution, or it’s possibly just me, but sometimes it’s hard for me to believe that the country is anything but center-right given the realities of my daily life.

    I’m not defending Howard Kurtz, may he burn in a thousand imaginary hells. I guess what I am saying is that if we want media types to at least seem less skewed, many tough-slog changes are going to have to happen to the culture first. And let’s face it, it’s far, far, far easier to be conservative than it is to be liberal, in the same way that it’s easier to blow up a house than it is to build it…

    It occurs to me that this may sound like a pessimistic comment when it really isn’t. I think things have been leaning our way for some time now, even without the disaster of the Bush years, but I do think that these things tend to happen slowly, sometimes so slowly that one would be forgiven for wondering if things will ever change at all.

  29. 29.

    Violet

    November 20, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    To stay in the good graces of elite media is simple—just keep saying everything is good news for conservatives, that we are a center-right nation, that John McCain is a principled maverick and so on. Criticize the Iraq war and you get shit-canned—ask Ashleigh Banfield or Phil Donahue. Any reporter interested in having a cushy, high-paying gig for the rest of his or her life would be foolish not to keep repeating the Village-approved talking points.

    So true. And in this economy they’re extra careful. It wouldn’t be easy to find another cushy gig were they to stray leftward.

    How did the whole Woodward/Bernstein/Watergate thing happen, though? I mean, they took down Nixon. That wasn’t following the whole center-right playbook. Could something like that happen again?

  30. 30.

    jenniebee

    November 20, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    OK, I completely missed it, what did McPain do exactly to get himself injected into the news cycle? Did he continue to not support the health care bill, continue to not support the stimulus, continue to be in the minority opposition party, continue to have, for all I know, pedicure parties with Joe Lieberman… what? I mean, if what he was doing before was supporting Obama, who needs his support anyway?

  31. 31.

    Randy P

    November 20, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    @Zifnab:

    MSNBC’s worst rating hours are hosted by left wing Maddow and Olbermann,

    There seems something there at odds with what I’ve been hearing over the last few years.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/02/may-ratings-mayhem-fox-ne_n_210500.html

    MSNBC’s “Countdown with Keith Olbermann” was the only non-Fox News show to crack the top 10, coming in at #10 with 1.094 million total viewers and 323,000 A25-54…
    Olbermann has been a ratings juggernaut for several years on MSNBC, with his last year-over-year monthly decline coming in September 2006

    Here’s the most recent data from a TV ratings web site

    For the MSNBC lineup. These are the MSNBC titles pulled from the hour-by-hour listing. The three numbers are overall, 25-54 and 35-64. Rachel and Keith get two listings because they are broadcast twice.

    Morning Joe- 324,000 viewers (119,000) (188,000)
    Hardball w/ Chris Matthews—502,000 viewers (107,000) (266,000)
    Ed Show—495,000 viewers (118,000) (271,000)
    Hardball w/ C. Matthews—625,000 viewers (132,000) (295,000)
    Countdown w/ K. Olbermann – 1,041,000 viewers (288,000) (488,000)
    Rachel Maddow Show —957,000 viewers (273,000) (448,000)
    Countdown w/ K. Olbermann – 575,000 viewers (162,000) (286,000)
    Rachel Maddow Show —361,000 viewers (129,000) (240,000)

    I’m having a hard time trying to figure out how you equate these numbers with the “worst rating hours”. Unless you are comparing the late-night rebroadcast with something primetime or something.

    I did find lots of right-wing websites trumpeting how they are ratings losers. But no actual ratings numbers justifying that.

    Is this Karl Rove math?

  32. 32.

    RememberNovember

    November 20, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    George Orwell is laughing his ass off right now, whilst having tea with FDR and Che Guevara.

  33. 33.

    Stooleo

    November 20, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    The Wikipedia page on barnacles is fascinating. What was most astounding was this quote.

    The sessile lifestyle of barnacles makes sexual reproduction difficult, as the organisms cannot leave their shells to mate. To facilitate genetic transfer between isolated individuals, barnacles have extraordinarily long penises. Barnacles have the largest penis to body size ratio of the animal kingdom[12].

    I hope that this doesn’t apply to the villagers.

  34. 34.

    MikeJ

    November 20, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    @Randy P: It just makes a better story if you can say Rachel Maddow is the same as Rush Limbaugh. No thinking required and everybody’s equally not as cool as me.

  35. 35.

    ChrisZ

    November 20, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    Do barnacles eat their own brain’s too? I thought it was just sea squirt’s that did that. I guess it’s such a successful strategy that multiple creatures employ the tactic.

  36. 36.

    Zifnab

    November 20, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @Randy P:

    Is this Karl Rove math?

    Sarcasm, actually. FOX ratings have also been climbing. In fact, the more partisan you get – traditionally – the better your ratings are.

    CNN’s milquetoast stenographer garbage and pro-corporate-but-not-really-partisan-one-way-or-another message isn’t winning them much of anything.

  37. 37.

    El Cid

    November 20, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    George Orwell is laughing his ass off right now, whilst having tea with FDR and Che Guevara.

    Che liked tea?

  38. 38.

    Napoleon

    November 20, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    @Stooleo:

    I hope that this doesn’t apply to the villagers.

    Actually many of them are big dicks.

  39. 39.

    goblue72

    November 20, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    @Randy P: Ai yai – I think zinfab was being snarky. (i.e. the left-wing shows on MSNBC and right-wing shows on Fox get the ratings while the more objective, straight news of CNN sits in the ratings toilet – in other words, we get the kind of journalists we want)

  40. 40.

    Randy P

    November 20, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @Zifnab:

    Ah, OK. For some reason it often seems hard on this site to distinguish the trolls from the snarkers. Or maybe it’s just me.

    What I said about right-wing sites is true. What you’ll mostly turn up when you search for “Olbermann ratings” or “Maddow ratings” is right-wing sites crowing about how they’re going downhill and on the way to cancellation.

    And as usual for your modern neo-con, completely disconnected from the numbers. Hence my comment about Karl Rove and his “we’ve got the math” from Election 2008.

  41. 41.

    Elizabelle

    November 20, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    One of the problems re ratings: It’s not that CNN is “moderate.”

    It’s that CNN sucks royally. It was way better several years ago.

    Fareed Zakariah’s GPS is one of its few bright spots.

    Otherwise: sheer repetition and your brain cells hit the floor.

    Constantly Negative News.

  42. 42.

    Zifnab

    November 20, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    @Randy P: CNN’s ratings have been in the tank for years now. I assumed that was common knowledge when I made the Blitzer quip. I think they’re somewhere in the 200k range most of the day, which is pretty abysmal given the market available.

    I, personally, don’t get anywhere near cable news – left, right, or center – because all of it is so nauseatingly ego-drenched and generally snark free.

  43. 43.

    freelancer

    November 20, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    OT- I love me some TNC today:

    There are people pumping up Sarah’s head, and she’s just ig’nant to take the bait. She will run in 2012–and get destroyed in the primary. She needs to talk to Ziggy Sobtka. It all ends with her stranded up on one of those cans…

  44. 44.

    Omnes Ominbus

    November 20, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    @El Cid: Che liked chai.

    Re: barnacles and brain eating. Insert zombie joke here [ ].

  45. 45.

    DougJ

    November 20, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    This is going to sound like a defense of bad journalistic behavior when it is not. But you really can’t overestimate the tendency one has to trust the response one has to one’s own surroundings.

    I agree with you.

  46. 46.

    sparky

    November 20, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    two words: Citizen Kane

  47. 47.

    Elizabelle

    November 20, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    “Senator Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska, and one of three members of his party who had expressed reservations about starting debate on the major health care legislation, has issued a statement saying that he will vote to bring the bill to the floor.

    … The Senate is expected to vote Saturday evening on whether to take up the legislation. To send the bill forward will require all 60 votes under nominal Democratic control in the Senate — 58 Democrats and 2 independents, and precisely the minimum number needed to overcome Republican blocking tactics. Senator Nelson is one of three Democrats whose vote has been uncertain. The other two are Mary L. Landrieu, Democrat of Louisiana, and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas.”

    http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/senator-nelson-will-vote-to-start-health-debate

  48. 48.

    Emma Anne

    November 20, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    @Violet: How did the whole Woodward/Bernstein/Watergate thing happen, though? I mean, they took down Nixon. That wasn’t following the whole center-right playbook. Could something like that happen again?

    They were police reporters, not political reporters. Sure, the same thing could happen again. But it would be a fluke, just like that was.

    There is a reason why Izzy Stone is so celebrated by us lefties. He was extremely unusual. Sui generis, really. And they tried to make his life a living hell because of it.

  49. 49.

    licensed to kill time

    November 20, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    @Stooleo: Wow, huge pen!s to body size ratio, AND it eats its own brain. Sounds like a dream guy. Your own barnacle boy toy.

  50. 50.

    R-Jud

    November 20, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @sparky: It’s apt and all, but all I could keep thinking while watching that clip was: “This is one take! One take!!”

    Jesus, Orson Welles makes me feel so unworthy. To have done that before he was 30! I gotta watch that whole thing again sometime.

  51. 51.

    Tommy

    November 20, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    once a barnacle finds a good rock to attach itself to, the barnacle eats its brain

    I don’t want to spoil your analogy, but this is wrong on so many levels …

    How would a filter feeding crustacean eat its own brain?

  52. 52.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    November 20, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    @Ugh: I don’t think Olberman and Maddow are trying “[t]o stay in the good graces of elite media” as Doug put it.

  53. 53.

    L. Ron Obama

    November 20, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    “Hung like a barnacle” doesn’t have the same ring to it.

  54. 54.

    Mike G

    November 20, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    How did the whole Woodward/Bernstein/Watergate thing happen, though? I mean, they took down Nixon. That wasn’t following the whole center-right playbook.

    That was a case of different right wing factions in conflict. Mark Felt (Deep Throat), the second in command at the FBI, was certainly not a liberal crusader for freedom and transparency in government on principle. And Woodward was pretty much a tool of Naval Intelligence. Nixon went down because he pissed off powerful right wingers.

  55. 55.

    Shawn in ShowMe

    November 20, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Senator Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska, and one of three members of his party who had expressed reservations about starting debate on the major health care legislation, has issued a statement saying that he will vote to bring the bill to the floor.

    Apparently Reid persuaded him by agreeing to exclude a measure to end the anti-trust exemptions for the insurance industry. That’s actually a a decent bit of negotiating. There’s no way that measure would have made it to the final bill anyway. The odds of Pauly Shore making a comeback are better.

  56. 56.

    Ruckus

    November 20, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    @The Grand Panjandrum:
    I thought that their heads were so far up their asses that they were back sitting on their shoulders. It’s what they depend on, they look, well, normal but really their heads are firmly up their ass.

  57. 57.

    oklahomo

    November 20, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    @licensed to kill time:

    Maybe this explains all the gropings Bobo gets under the table from Senators . . . it wasn’t a hand, Bobo.

  58. 58.

    Royce

    November 20, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    I think it’s soft-pedaling to say our media are lazy or dumb.

    The media’s corporate owners wish to have a certain reality portrayed, and the media “stars” comply (I can’t call them journalists). And even if this arrangement has damaged our nation to the point of its being treason … we Americans collectively just sit and take it and tell ourselves gentler stories to explain the situation.

    It’s gone on so long that our media is now composed of professional propagandists. However, these are hardworking, intelligent propagandists: the dumb and lazy ones are us, the American people.

    And still so many people can’t seem to see what’s going on, which is testimony to the blacker arts of political mass-media rhetoric. The propagandists are very expert at keeping us all “spinning.”

  59. 59.

    slag

    November 20, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    Difficult to determine who is more the optimist in this debate: John Cole or DougJ.

    Theoretically, in John Cole’s model, stupid is intrinsic to the individuals, but given that there’s some variability in the system, the completely stupid individuals in it can be replaced with less stupid ones. In DougJ’s model, stupid is intrinsic to the system, and for the less stupid individuals in the system to survive, they must become completely stupid.

    Either way, I’m pretty sure stupid wins this one.

  60. 60.

    Bruce (formerly Steve S.)

    November 20, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    I think the likes of Todd and Kurtz are chosen for their positions precisely because they are purveyors of conventional wisdom. That is to say, you get mostly centrist pablum from the media not because reporters are idiots or are hapless victims of systematic right-wing pressure (though those things play a role) but primarily because the execs choose this sort of journalist in the first place. Just a thought.

  61. 61.

    sparky

    November 20, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    @R-Jud: well, yes, but keep in mind how the rest of his life turned out when you think about the age issue.

  62. 62.

    Liberty60

    November 20, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    @Darius:

    Eh, laziness may explain why the mainstream media prefers “narratives”, but it doesn’t explain why the mainstream media always chooses to run with the right-wing narrative.

    My take on this is that most journalists are grad school alums along with the DC policy wonks and polliticos; they eat at the same restaurants, send their kids to the same schools, live next door to each other in Gerogetown.

    They aren’t “liberal” in the sense of being leftist, and they aren’t “conservative” in the Palin/ Beck/ Erick Erickson mold;
    they are Yuppies who naturally see the world through the filter of upper class priviledge and entitlement.
    A tax cut is meaningful to them and their world; a reduction in AFDC is an abstraction they read about in a position paper.

    When a common thief is sent to prison for life for stealing a slice of pizza, they understand the need to be tough on crime; when a government official allows a man on the other side of the world to be tortured to death, they understand that we should “keep on walking” that this would be “criminalizing policy differences” and that sort of thing.

  63. 63.

    mere mortal

    November 20, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    Sorry, DougJ, you were not the first to make a connection of this sort:

    “The juvenile sea squirt wanders through the sea searching for a suitable rock or hunk of coral to cling to and make its home for life. For this task it has a rudimentary nervous system. When it finds its spot and takes root, it doesn’t need its brain anymore, so it eats it.
    It’s rather like getting tenure.”
    – Daniel C. Dennett, Consciousness Explained, 1991

  64. 64.

    Howlin Wolfe

    November 20, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @ChrisZ: They eat their own apostrophe””””s

  65. 65.

    tc

    November 20, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    I’ve talked to Howard Kurtz before and I know two people who know him well. By all accounts, he’s dumb as a rock.

  66. 66.

    DougJ

    November 20, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    Sorry, DougJ, you were not the first to make a connection of this sort:

    You found it! I wanted to reference this but I only heard it verbally and didn’t know if it was something my friend just said once or if it was a real saying.

    Thanks.

  67. 67.

    Redshirt

    November 20, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Are there any national media outlets that are not corporate owned? NY Times, maybe?

  68. 68.

    DougJ

    November 20, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    Are there any national media outlets that are not corporate owned? NY Times, maybe?

    Neither NYT nor WaPo is corporate owned.

  69. 69.

    Mike G

    November 20, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    When a common thief is sent to prison for life for stealing a slice of pizza, they understand the need to be tough on crime

    Yet when “one of their own” villagers is convicted for involvement in blowing the cover of a covert CIA agent and destroying a CIA anti-nuclear-proliferation network, they are outraged that any punishment be imposed upon a member of their oh-so-special tribe, and demand a pardon.

    Spoiled, self-entitled, solipsistic douchebags.

  70. 70.

    drillfork

    November 20, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    @Athenae:

    Laziness is a very underrated fault of the Villagers. These guys have cushy jobs (including those bennies that we simply can’t afford to give the Unwashed Rabble) and lavish lifestyles. Because they can just wallow around in groupthink with other Villagers, they never have to do any actual reporting — i.e., work.

    As to why it’s always right-wing nonsense they spew, it’s because they’re almost completely insulated. America may not really be a center-right nation, but the Beltway sure in the fuk is…

  71. 71.

    drillfork

    November 20, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @Royce:

    I hate to NOT be cynical here, but I think most Americans actually have… let’s call them good intentions. But you have a family, a job and you’re trying to scrape by, you just don’t have a lot of time for digest news beyond the boldest headlines. And, as we all know, the boldest headlines are incredibly fucking misleading. Hell, I basically had to drop out of society before I had the time to find out what’s really going on. (And plenty of days, especially after reading Glenzilla, Taibbi, Naomi Klein et al, I wish I didn’t know what I know.)

    Yes, Americans are largely ignorant. And of a few of them are proudly and deservedly ignorant. But I believe that the majority of Ignorant Americans are just trying to live, and they just haven’t found the time to know any better.

    Warren Zevon on his final album: It’s the home of the brave, and the land of the free, where the less you know, the better off you’ll be…

  72. 72.

    mere mortal

    November 20, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    My pleasure, DougJ.

    That quote has been a favorite of mine for a long time, I remember e-mailing it to my then-boss when he earned tenure at a major university over a dozen years ago.

  73. 73.

    fraught

    November 20, 2009 at 7:58 pm

    Would it be elitist to say that someone with a high-school diploma and a couple of years of college might not be the best guy for a network to have as it’s White House correspondent and as the head of it’s political division? It’s taking Chuck longer to get his degree than it took Sarah by about 16 years.
    CT is the exemplar of Good Guy Networking, a school of advancement theory invented and practiced by Tim Russert and entails heavy use of football fandom as a career strategy and pretending to use a superficial knowledge of statistical analysis to confound the brains of everyone who hated their statistics courses in school and that means everyone.

  74. 74.

    BrianG

    November 21, 2009 at 12:24 am

    Cool analogy, but where is the claim that a barnacle eats its own brain coming from? I can’t find any supporting evidence for that…

  75. 75.

    Pococurante

    November 21, 2009 at 9:56 am

    I can’t either. They maintain an eye over their lifetime so some degree of brain is required.

    Another great faith-based analogy brought low by the Scientific Method. ;-)

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - lashonharangue - Along the Zambezi River [2 of 2] 8
Image by lashonharangue (7/8/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Wisconsin Is A Reminder of Why We Should Never Give up (Jul 8, 2025 @ 8:11pm)
  • WTFGhost on Open Thread: The Dignity of Honest Work (Jul 8, 2025 @ 8:10pm)
  • cmorenc on Sportsball Open Thread: Suprise! FIFA Says It Can Work With Don TACO (Jul 8, 2025 @ 8:08pm)
  • SpaceUnit on Sportsball Open Thread: Suprise! FIFA Says It Can Work With Don TACO (Jul 8, 2025 @ 8:08pm)
  • Chetan Murthy on Sportsball Open Thread: Suprise! FIFA Says It Can Work With Don TACO (Jul 8, 2025 @ 8:04pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!