• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

“Squeaker” McCarthy

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Second rate reporter says what?

We are aware of all internet traditions.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

The words do not have to be perfect.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

No one could have predicted…

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

You can’t love your country only when you win.

He really is that stupid.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

White supremacy is terrorism.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / The Murdochian candidate

The Murdochian candidate

by DougJ|  January 12, 201010:16 am| 75 Comments

This post is in: Assholes, Good News For Conservatives

FacebookTweetEmail

Crypto-Republican Harold Ford insists he is a real Democrat. And what better place to prove your Democratic bona fides than the New York Post?

I hate to get all FireDogLake about this, but I’m ready to start following Harold Ford around with giant paper machier papier-mache dolls if he gets into this race.

Update. Commenter williamc:

Come on, Harold Ford only thinks he has a shot in New York because he is light-skinned and only speaks with a Negro dialect when he chooses to do so.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Med. Marijuana
Next Post: Burn, baby, burn »

Reader Interactions

75Comments

  1. 1.

    williamc

    January 12, 2010 at 10:19 am

    Come on, Harold Ford only thinks he has a shot in New York because he is light-skinned and only speaks with a Negro dialect when he chooses to do so.

    Speaking as one of those light-skinned black folk who only speaks with a Negro dialect when I choose to, Ford is an embarassment to Tennesseans, Democrats, and Carpetbaggers. Go back to loosing in your home state Ford.

  2. 2.

    jeffreyw

    January 12, 2010 at 10:20 am

    Keep a close eye on your kittehs, folks.

  3. 3.

    New Yorker

    January 12, 2010 at 10:26 am

    butbutbutbutbutbut…..Gillibrand was a supporter of TEH GUNZ when she was a congresswoman. Who cares if she was on the right side of the healthcare debate and has generally voted exactly as New York Democrats would like her to? PRIMARY HER!!!!!!!

  4. 4.

    beltane

    January 12, 2010 at 10:28 am

    Ford should run for Dorgan’s seat in North Dakota. If Merrill-Lynch wants their own personal Senate seat, let them have that one. I’m still trying to figure out who, beyond Manhattan’s high-society circles, will support this smarmy tool.

  5. 5.

    phantomist

    January 12, 2010 at 10:28 am

    Really, I am. Some of my best friends are soft on terror.

  6. 6.

    AdrianLesher

    January 12, 2010 at 10:29 am

    Of course FireDogLake (a once great blog) is getting a bit crypto-Replublican with Jane Hamsher palling around with Grover Norquist.

  7. 7.

    Cat Lady

    January 12, 2010 at 10:30 am

    It’s papier mache
    /DFH

    The test to determine whether a Democrat is a crypto Republican is whether wingnut Cole used to like them. Ford is on the list, as is Bayh and Lieberman. This is a more accurate gauge than the Post, albeit without the heaping contempt that comes with it.

  8. 8.

    Notorious P.A.T.

    January 12, 2010 at 10:30 am

    2 of the first 3 comments with horrible spelling. Kill this thread.

  9. 9.

    ellaesther

    January 12, 2010 at 10:31 am

    @williamc: But did your father once own a Laundromat? In a Black neighborhood?

    If not, Rod Blagojevich is probably a better judge than you.

  10. 10.

    Zifnab

    January 12, 2010 at 10:32 am

    My god, Ford is such a tool. Although he is an excellent case study in what conservative Democrats and Blue Dogs think of primary challenges when the candidate isn’t named Lieberman.

    I am honestly a bit confused why he’s even dipping his toe into NY. Do his pollers even give him half a chance? Best case scenario, he’s a black dude with zero name recognition. Who is going to be voting for this guy over an established incumbent? He’d have better luck running as a Green.

  11. 11.

    JGabriel

    January 12, 2010 at 10:33 am

    Harold Ford:

    My cumulative grade with NARAL during 10 years in Congress was right at 80 percent.

    Dude, do you really think that’s good enough in New York? We legalized abortion before Roe v. Wade. Anything less than a 95% NARAL score is unlikely to fly here.

    .

  12. 12.

    valdivia

    January 12, 2010 at 10:36 am

    I don’t know who it was but during the primary fights Ford was called The Dark Sith. It always made me lol. I think it was @ Jack and Jill Politics.

  13. 13.

    williamc

    January 12, 2010 at 10:37 am

    @ellaesther:

    No, my pops didn’t own a laudromat in a black neighborhood, but he DID own a garage in a black neighborhood, where there were always cars up on bricks out front; guess that makes me blacker than Blagojevich, though I have to admit, I know a few black women who would KILL for that wig he wears.

  14. 14.

    Keith G

    January 12, 2010 at 10:37 am

    @Zifnab:

    he’s a black dude with zero name recognition

    No way! His name is everywhere on the street.

  15. 15.

    Jim

    January 12, 2010 at 10:37 am

    I’m still trying to figure out who, beyond Manhattan’s high-society circles, will support this smarmy tool.

    I think the disconnect between Ford’s high name-ID in the cable TV corridor and the real world is gonna make this one of the great embarrassments of contemporary politics. And it couldn’t happen to a bigger tool. Has he hired Dan Gerstein yet?

  16. 16.

    Will

    January 12, 2010 at 10:41 am

    When confronted with an already suspiciously conservative Dem in a notably liberal state, the smart move is always to primary them FROM THE RIGHT.

    This makes perfect sense.

  17. 17.

    ellaesther

    January 12, 2010 at 10:42 am

    @williamc: As a white woman, I am unable to properly judge the relative Black-ness of garage with cars on bricks vs. laundromats (with, one presumes, baskets of clothes), so I will leave that to you and Rod to work out.

    However, I would respectfully suggest that if anyone, Black woman or no, tries to touch that hair, fingers — indeed, entire limbs — may be lost. I’m from Illinois. I know these things.

  18. 18.

    Dr. Squid

    January 12, 2010 at 10:43 am

    @Keith G:

    No way! His name is everywhere on the street.

    Usually on cinder blocks.

  19. 19.

    JGabriel

    January 12, 2010 at 10:45 am

    Zifnab:

    I am honestly a bit confused why he’s even dipping his toe into NY. … Who is going to be voting for this guy over an established incumbent?

    To be fair, Gillibrand was appointed by Paterson, who is extremely unpopular, and she isn’t exactly an established incumbent yet.

    That said, Gillibrand is likable, a smart pol, and seems to be doing a good job representing the state so far. I don’t think she’ll have much trouble winning a primary against Ford.

    Finally, there are no black senators right now. Even though I’m not a fan of Ford’s politics and suspect that his motive for running is as much crass opportunism as anything else, I can’t really fault him for wanting to rectify the imbalance — assuming that too is a factor in his decision.

    .

  20. 20.

    Jim C

    January 12, 2010 at 10:46 am

    @JGabriel:

    Finally, there are no black senators right now.

    And yet, somewhere, Roland Burris is softly weeping.

  21. 21.

    Jim

    January 12, 2010 at 10:46 am

    Finally, there are no black senators right now.

    Hey, now! Roland Burris may not be much of a Senator, but….

  22. 22.

    arguingwithsignposts

    January 12, 2010 at 10:47 am

    If you have NetFlix subscription, I highly recommend watching “The Party’s Over,” a Philip Seymour Hoffman documentary. Harold Ford is in the opening minutes of the film, and he talks about the influence of money on politics. It’s a fascinating time machine look at this weasel of an individual. The entire film is good, if depressing, like looking at pictures of New Orleans before Katrina.

  23. 23.

    arguingwithsignposts

    January 12, 2010 at 10:48 am

    @JGabriel:

    I can’t really fault him for wanting to rectify the imbalance — assuming that too is a factor in his decision.

    Harold Ford is black? I thought he was running to represent green ($$$)

  24. 24.

    eastriver

    January 12, 2010 at 10:48 am

    @Dr. Squid:

    He could get beat her. Gillibrand is a wretched politician.

    But if you really want to make some 10′ puppets, I’m in, Doug. I live in the city.

    Let’s do it.

    PUPPETS ARE EFFECTIVE POLITICAL TOOLS. Just ask Dario Fo.

  25. 25.

    MattMinus

    January 12, 2010 at 10:49 am

    Someone should ask Marc Green and Freddy Ferrer how this will end…

  26. 26.

    Roland Burris

    January 12, 2010 at 10:49 am

    @JGabriel:

    You’re off the guest list for my next birthday party.

  27. 27.

    gopher2b

    January 12, 2010 at 10:54 am

    @williamc:

    I hate New York Senate Carpetbaggers too!!

  28. 28.

    Punchy

    January 12, 2010 at 10:56 am

    I think Chevy Chase needs to run against Harold Ford. Watch him Dodge the questions about Cadillac health care taxes. He’d be all, “Yugo over there, and raise your right Honda if you know the answer to these problems…otherwise, get Audi here”.

    Jesus Chrysler would that be awesome.

  29. 29.

    Balconesfault

    January 12, 2010 at 10:57 am

    No ELECTED black senators?

  30. 30.

    Keith G

    January 12, 2010 at 10:58 am

    What’s Russ Feingold up to?

    From Politico:

    Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) has told a Milwaukee-area TV station he’s not sure whether to heed GOP calls for Harry Reid’s resignation — or stick with the nearly unanimous chorus of Democrats who say he should stay.

    A Feingold quote:

    I have not decided whether these comments merit that [resignation] or not. They’re very unfortunate. They should have never been said. So, I need to think about it….

    Oh, to be or not to be….

  31. 31.

    Alex S.

    January 12, 2010 at 10:59 am

    I have this strange feeling that Kirsten Gillibrand is a future president.

  32. 32.

    JGabriel

    January 12, 2010 at 11:05 am

    Jim C:

    And yet, somewhere, Roland Burris is softly weeping.

    God, I keep forgetting about him. I’m a doofus.

    Thanks for the correction.

    .

  33. 33.

    Mnemosyne

    January 12, 2010 at 11:08 am

    @jeffreyw:

    That’s one of the many reasons our cats are indoor-only — we’re close to the foothills and we get coyotes trotting down our sidewalks fairly often. At least the mountain lions seem more interested in getting to Griffith Park where the deer are.

  34. 34.

    Ash Can

    January 12, 2010 at 11:09 am

    This whole thing confuses me too. Why New York? Does he think that’s the Senate race in which he has the best chance of winning? Are Wall Street puppetmasters parachuting him in? Both A and B? Aren’t a lot of voters going to be saying, “Holy crap, it’s Keyes vs. Clinton all over again; gimme a break”? (Except that Ford isn’t as entertaining, too bad.) Add to this the WH’s apparent support of Gillibrand, according to Robert Gibbs. (He said this recently at a press briefing — too preoccupied with other stuff right now to look for the link.) I mean, WTF? Does Ford feel as though he’s got nothing to lose and a whole lot to gain?

    I don’t get it.

  35. 35.

    General Winfield Stuck

    January 12, 2010 at 11:10 am

    to early to comment

  36. 36.

    Kirk Spencer

    January 12, 2010 at 11:10 am

    For those who don’t recall, Harold Ford is carrying some major grudge against the Republicans. (Remember ““Call me”?) If he got in I’m pretty sure he’d be more than a little uncooperative with that party’s agenda. That said, he was definitely the lesser of two evils when running against Corker in 2006, and he’s a great example of how blue in the South is red everywhere else.

  37. 37.

    Bill H

    January 12, 2010 at 11:10 am

    Didn’t he just run for Governor in Tennessee as a Republican? Maybe I have the party wrong. Maybe it was Virginia. Maybe it wasn’t even him, just another cardboard cutout of him. (Note, “another.”)

  38. 38.

    JGabriel

    January 12, 2010 at 11:13 am

    @Bill H:

    Didn’t he just run for Governor in Tennessee as a Republican?

    Senator.

    Which he lost.

    Are you seeing the problem here?

    .

  39. 39.

    SGEW

    January 12, 2010 at 11:14 am

    @General Winfield Stuck: Talk about a quagmire . . .

  40. 40.

    ellaesther

    January 12, 2010 at 11:17 am

    @JGabriel: He’s my Senator and I forget about him. Honestly.

  41. 41.

    Zifnab

    January 12, 2010 at 11:24 am

    @Punchy: Win.

  42. 42.

    mistermix

    January 12, 2010 at 11:25 am

    @eastriver:

    He could get beat her. Gillibrand is a wretched politician.

    Yeah, beating the incumbent in a R+3/4 Congressional district is the hallmark of a wretched politician.

  43. 43.

    Jim

    January 12, 2010 at 11:26 am

    Didn’t he just run for Governor in Tennessee as a Republican?

    Senator as a Dem, a pro-war, pro-Lieberman, anti-choice, anti-gay rights, keep-Terri-on-the-tube Democrat, but with a D after his name. Lost a close race in the biggest Dem year since ’92, after which the Clintons started a campaign to get him Howard Dean’s job. Spent the fall of ’08 sucking up to Obama in a desperate quest for a Cabinet job. Currently auditions for his own FoxNews show (do they have a “Black Democrat Concern Troll Show”? I can’t believe they haven’t hired him. Maybe Juan Williams has some exclusivity clause) on Morning Ho.

  44. 44.

    General Winfield Stuck

    January 12, 2010 at 11:26 am

    Wingnuttery from Scott Brown

    “We are at war,’’ Brown said. “We’re at war in our airports. We’re at war in our shopping malls. I have to be honest with you, folks. . . . I’m scared at some of the policies that I’ve heard.’’

    I sure hope you Bay Staters get out to vote against this fool. If he wins, we will never forgive you.

  45. 45.

    Waynski

    January 12, 2010 at 11:29 am

    As a born and bred New Yorker, I can’t for the life of me understand the motivation here. Another commenter pointed out that Gillebrand’s vulnerable from the left, not the right. I can’t see what Ford thinks he can accomplish. I mean it’s one thing if you’re Hillary Clinton or Bobby Kennedy, but Harold Ford? Who? Really?

  46. 46.

    valdivia

    January 12, 2010 at 11:29 am

    @General Winfield Stuck:

    did anyone here watch the Mass debate yesterday? TPM had a report but Kleefeld wrote it and I don’t trust his analysis (never have).

  47. 47.

    arguingwithsignposts

    January 12, 2010 at 11:31 am

    @General Winfield Stuck:

    we shall fight in the airports,
    we shall fight on the Putt-Putt greens,
    we shall fight in the malls and in the mini-marts,
    we shall fight in the facebook pages;
    we shall never surrender.

    Yeah, just doesn’t have the same ring as the original.

  48. 48.

    GregB

    January 12, 2010 at 11:31 am

    Harold Ford is no carpet-bagger. He’s a douche-bagger.

    -G

  49. 49.

    williamc

    January 12, 2010 at 11:34 am

    @GregB: I think this nails my feelings on Ford in a single phrase.

  50. 50.

    Nick

    January 12, 2010 at 11:35 am

    @New Yorker: Forget about teh gunz, she hasn’t kissed the feet of every rabbi in Brooklyn, every priest in Queens, every banker in Manhattan. She’s from that hick country north of the Tappen Zee. Who the hell does she think she is thinking she can represent New York (City)

  51. 51.

    Nick

    January 12, 2010 at 11:38 am

    @JGabriel:

    Finally, there are no black senators right now.

    Well, there used to be one, but he got a better job.

    If you want a black senator, get one to run. Bill Thompson? Yvette Clarke? Byron Brown? We’re not short on black people in New York State, believe me, my mother reminds me every damn day.

  52. 52.

    James K. Polk, Esq.

    January 12, 2010 at 11:46 am

    Doesn’t it make sense?

    If the big money boyz primary Gillibrand (who isn’t a risk to the boyz) from the right, SHE CAN’T BE VULNERABLE FROM THE LEFT.

    It’s win-win. Either progressives line up behind Gillibrand or Ford takes the primary and it’s Republican vs. Republican in the general.

    Checkmate.

  53. 53.

    Sloegin

    January 12, 2010 at 11:46 am

    And nothing but nothing screams Democratic ‘Cred like being a FOX news contributor.

  54. 54.

    JGabriel

    January 12, 2010 at 11:59 am

    Nick:

    If you want a black senator …

    Huh? Where’d that interpretation come from? We were discussing Ford’s motive for entering the race, not my preferences. For what it’s worth, I’m satisfied with the job Gillibrand is doing so far.

    And while I do think it would be good to have more black representation in the Senate, Ford certainly wouldn’t be my first choice.

    .

  55. 55.

    John S.

    January 12, 2010 at 12:01 pm

    TPM had a report but Kleefeld wrote it and I don’t trust his analysis (never have).

    That report was pretty lopsided, and make it seem like Coakley got he r clock cleaned by Brown.

    Personally, I think this is all a concerted effort by the blogosphere and party to light a fire under voters asses – and I am all for that. Although I confess, I think that there would be no better way to do that than for Brown to win. I mean, a Democrat seeking to replace a Kennedy LOSES in Massachusetts, thereby causing HCR and everything else to grind to a screeching halt? What better way to shine a light on the stakes for Democrats and the country?

    Perhaps a loss now – or a near-loss at the very least – will do wonders to get Dems off their asses in November.

  56. 56.

    New Yorker

    January 12, 2010 at 12:01 pm

    Forget about teh gunz, she hasn’t kissed the feet of every rabbi in Brooklyn, every priest in Queens, every banker in Manhattan. She’s from that hick country north of the Tappen Zee. Who the hell does she think she is thinking she can represent New York (City)

    Pretty much. I love this city and all, but sometimes the condescension towards the 6.2 million people in this state (more people than the political prize Missouri has) who don’t live in the NYC metropolitan area is aggravating. It’s as if the entirety of upstate is right out of “Deliverance”.

  57. 57.

    eemom

    January 12, 2010 at 12:15 pm

    dude, this isn’t “getting all FDL.” Harold Ford is an actual bona fide creep who really wants to fuck things up.

    “getting FDL” = mounting hysterical McCarthyesque smear jobs against people who are trying to get shit done.

    Latest casualty, Paul Krugman. Never woulda pegged him for a Rahmbot, but Jane can smell ’em a mile off.

  58. 58.

    williamc

    January 12, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    @eemom:
    Is Hamsher really going to war with Kthug, links? Being one of the folks that backed her up in the beginning on how bad the Senate HCR bill was, she lost me when she went over to the Dark side with Grover “drown our government in a bathtub” Norquist. Does she really think that she has what it takes to bring down THE go-to Lib Economist? I don’t understand how the folks that follow here would go along with it either; I mean Krugman is the go-to guy for economic analysis from our side, he’s been an O-hater for longer than she has, how are they going to take him down and why would they want to? IF this is true, methinks her head up her arse is getting a little to big for her britches…

  59. 59.

    eemom

    January 12, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    @williamc:

    sorry, can’t link from work, but just pop over to Lake Batshit and you’ll see it.

    Together with Part 1 of a new expose about how ObamaRahmaReid got together to back stab Byron Dorgan.

    I’m beginning to re-evaluate my long held opinion of Hamsher as just another hypocritical, self-promoting megalomaniac. Maybe she actually does, as they say, need help.

  60. 60.

    Steaming Pile

    January 12, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    @Nick: Apparently, awareness that Upstate exists is a demerit in NYC politics. Actually having lived Upstate is a disqualifier.

  61. 61.

    gypsy howell

    January 12, 2010 at 1:06 pm

    I’m most pissed off at FDL for assimilating TBogg. I used to be a regular at his old, downhome basset-y site. But ever since he joined the Twinky Blinky Linky Borg, I can’t read him any more. Shame, really. I miss out on a lot.

    Oh, that and “Fitzmas!” — when the place turned into a junior-high caliber sorority. How’s that “we have it on good authority from deep inside Fitz’s investigation that Rove is within hours of being frogmarched to the death penalty” going?

  62. 62.

    Sly

    January 12, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    @Ash Can:

    I think this is just a way for Ford to get some face time on Cable TV on someone else’s dime. He’ll get money to run from Wall Street who thought they had an ally in Gillibrand, lose massively, and get some free publicity out of it. He’s got a book coming out next September, in case you didn’t know. Which is probably accurate, because who the fuck cares what Harold Ford has to say besides Joe Scarborough.

    If he seriously believes he has a shot, he’s a bigger idiot than most people think.

  63. 63.

    carlos the dwarf

    January 12, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    The chances of Ford beating Gillibrand?
    “Scratch and win, Harold, scratch and win.”

    EDIT: Can we please turn Scratch and Win into a tag or something?

  64. 64.

    BombIranForChrist

    January 12, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    Ugh, Ford will be yet another “moderate” ready to dip his wick in the corporate ink of Wall Street. He’s as corrupt as they come.

  65. 65.

    HyperIon

    January 12, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    @Notorious P.A.T. wrote :

    2 of the first 3 comments with horrible spelling. Kill this thread.

    maybe you’re snarking but…commenter #1 manages to misuse “only” twice in just the first sentence. a common error but PLEASE!

    Harold Ford only thinks he has a shot in New York because…

    should be

    Harold Ford thinks he has a shot in New York only because…

    he is light-skinned and only speaks with a Negro dialect when he chooses to do so

    should be

    he is light-skinned and speaks with a Negro dialect only when he chooses to do so

  66. 66.

    Jim

    January 12, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    @Sly:

    IHe’s got a book coming out next September, in case you didn’t know.

    I did not know that. At long last, this whole thing makes sense.

  67. 67.

    kommrade reproductive vigor

    January 12, 2010 at 1:37 pm

    Is it too much to hope the Tbaggers adopt him? That would be exactly what he deserves.

    @williamc: And once again my coworkers are startled by an outbreak of insane laughter from my cubicle.

  68. 68.

    ellaesther

    January 12, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    @HyperIon: Srsly? Dude. I’m a professional writer, and I’m just going to say that your blood pressure would be well served if you don’t go looking for, and poking sticks at, the way that people converse in these settings. A comments section is not school, or a professional presentation. This is the watercooler. We just happen to be verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry far away from each other.

  69. 69.

    Mike Kay

    January 12, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    OH! MY! GOD!

    Did you read the column:

    I am pro-choice — have always been since I entered politics almost 15 years ago. My cumulative grade with NARAL during 10 years in Congress was right at 80 percent. Any assertions to the contrary are false.

    Harold NOW says he’s pro-choice, even though he ran as anti-choice just three years ago.

    New Yorkers are not dumb. They are going to be so insulted.

  70. 70.

    Nellcote

    January 12, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    @Mike Kay:

    So NARAL will support Ford over Gillibrand like they supported Lieberman over Lamont?

  71. 71.

    Waynski

    January 12, 2010 at 3:19 pm

    @BombIranForChrist — Any Senator from New York will be in Wall Street’s pocket. RFK may not have been as he was independently wealthy. All the others, not so much. Comes with the territory.

  72. 72.

    Anne Laurie

    January 12, 2010 at 3:20 pm

    @Keith G:

    No way! His name is everywhere on the street.

    And after the primary headline writers will be able to revive the old Michigan acronym “Found On Road, Dead”.

  73. 73.

    rikyrah

    January 12, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    it warms my heart to see all the folks in the blogosphere that have the Dark Sith’s number.

  74. 74.

    David in NY

    January 12, 2010 at 5:12 pm

    My kid who’s on some young political type’s listserve says the word is he’s trying to make a splash to get that idiot Andrew Cuomo to pick him as his lieutenant governor.

    I like the book opening theory better, however. He knows he doesn’t stand a chance against Gillibrand.

    Finally, it’s just not so that “Gillibrand is a wretched politician.” I’m with whoever it was above predicting President Gillibrand. That’s more likely than lots of others with wider talk. She is really good.

  75. 75.

    The Truffle

    January 12, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    Dear Harold Ford:

    Please go back to Tennessee and make their lives miserable. Thank you.

    Sincerely,

    A New Yorker.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:28am)
  • John Revolta on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:20am)
  • Brachiator on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:16am)
  • Baud on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:07am)
  • Baud on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:05am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!