• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

One of our two political parties is a cult whose leader admires Vladimir Putin.

Bad people in a position to do bad things will do bad things because they are bad people. End of story.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

If a good thing happens for a bad reason, it’s still a good thing.

Do we throw up our hands or do we roll up our sleeves? (hint, door #2)

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

You cannot love your country only when you win.

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

Not loving this new fraud based economy.

When they say they are pro-life, they do not mean yours.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Let there be snark.

No one could have predicted…

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Narcissists are always shocked to discover other people have agency.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

Shut up, hissy kitty!

An almost top 10,000 blog!

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Tomorrow’s talking points today

Tomorrow’s talking points today

by DougJ|  January 18, 20105:28 pm| 24 Comments

This post is in: Assholes, Good News For Conservatives

FacebookTweetEmail

Regardless of what happens tomorrow in Massachusetts, Chilean voters have clearly rejected Obama’s agenda. Am I right?

(via)

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « We are all Dan Shaughnessy now
Next Post: A Sullivan classic »

Reader Interactions

24Comments

  1. 1.

    Brachiator

    January 18, 2010 at 5:32 pm

    Regardless of what happens tomorrow in Massachusetts, Chilean voters have clearly rejected Obama’s agenda. Am I right?

    Si, amigo.

  2. 2.

    beltane

    January 18, 2010 at 5:35 pm

    Oh great, a billionaire Pinochet clone invokes Obama and JFK in his victory speech. Thanks for making me ill.

  3. 3.

    Dannie22

    January 18, 2010 at 5:35 pm

    Is this the Return of Pinochet? Or perhaps Pinochet’s Revenge?

  4. 4.

    asiangrrlMN

    January 18, 2010 at 5:37 pm

    You’re just rolling with the good news today, aren’t you, DougJ? This gives me a big grumpy. Harumph.

  5. 5.

    valdivia

    January 18, 2010 at 5:40 pm

    DougJ a thread I can self promote on! So I have not written up my take on this and have a place holder instead on my new blog but look for it tomorrow or late late tonight (I am moving tomorrow and have to finish packing otherwise I would be ranting there all day). The winner is NOT the second coming of Pinochet. Shortly, the two bigs questions are: is this guy a Berlusconi or a Bloomberg? and how much will Pinera be owned by the right and how ready are they to govern as mature participants.

    and you think they won’t say that this has implications for Obama? I already saw a Yahoo headline saying this will make his diplomacy in South America difficult. That is so deeply stupid I cannot even address it yet. You think our media is bad on our own politics–you have no idea how bad they are talking about *my region’s* politics.

  6. 6.

    mr. whipple

    January 18, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    Regardless of what happens tomorrow in Massachusetts, Chilean voters have clearly rejected Obama’s agenda.

    What did Obama do now, boycott their sea bass?

  7. 7.

    The Raven

    January 18, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    @valdivia: There’s a psionic barrier at the southern border of the USA that usually prevents USers from even naming the rest of America.

    I hope you’re right that Pinera is not another Pinochet. But, Latin American politics, brrr.

  8. 8.

    Joshua Norton

    January 18, 2010 at 5:57 pm

    The upcoming Sunday talking heads script:

    1. If Brown wins it’s due to everyone hating the Dems with the heat of a thousand suns. New York is next to fall.

    2. If Coakley wins it’s due to massive voter fraud and ACORN.

    You read it here first.

  9. 9.

    General Winfield Stuck

    January 18, 2010 at 5:57 pm

    Let’s ring Kissinger for his take, if the old blood sucking buzzard is still taking up space on the planet.

  10. 10.

    Keith G

    January 18, 2010 at 5:57 pm

    Huh?

    Since Thurs., I have been going to great measures to avoid news, though I do slip up out of habit.

    For a while the news had been, at best irritating. Then the quake. My iPod has been filled with comedy podcasts and I am currently loading Youtube comedy clips on my laptop.

    Chile, Coakley, and suffering people the world over will have to wait for a few days while I look for reasons to smile.

  11. 11.

    Davis X. Machina

    January 18, 2010 at 5:59 pm

    Raven, quitcherbitch’.

    When you ask USers to name the rest of America In my experience they can reliably be counted on to produce not only Alaska but also Hawai’i.

    (The latter is in a mysterious box 1300 mi. southwest of San Diego. Or it was in my classroom.)

  12. 12.

    valdivia

    January 18, 2010 at 6:02 pm

    @The Raven:

    Yep, our politics are worse than a Garcia marquez novel.

    As for Pinera: He is definitely not a Pinochet. I really do not mean any disrespect to anyone here but the facile right wing guy=Pinochet and left wing guy=Castro/Guevara is just lazy. And this is one of the reasons I started my blog. Ok enough pimping. Now to your point: what does the election mean? There are deep questions about the parties that make up the coalition Pinera ran on but he is very much a guy used to running his own show so the right wing coalition may or may not play a large role in his governing. This may be good if doubts about the commitment of the parties to the democratic process prove real but it is also a problem because Chile is the one country where the party system works and personalistic parties have not emerged. If Pinera proves to be that kind of president, than I think that is bad news institutionally. Much to digest with his win, and much to keep one’s eye on.

  13. 13.

    Maude

    January 18, 2010 at 6:08 pm

    @General Winfield Stuck: He ain’t never gonna die.

  14. 14.

    New Yorker

    January 18, 2010 at 6:12 pm

    The winner is NOT the second coming of Pinochet.

    Yeah, seriously, a conservative candidate in a democratic election is not Pinochet. Let me know when he starts murdering political opponents by the thousands, and then the label will be apt.

    I already saw a Yahoo headline saying this will make his diplomacy in South America difficult.

    if it’s the same article I saw, I think it meant that Pinera’s diplomacy will be tough, since he’ll have to deal leftists across South America, some benign (Uruguay, Argentina), and some not so much (the Bolivarian Buffoon in Caracas).

  15. 15.

    valdivia

    January 18, 2010 at 6:18 pm

    @New Yorker:

    I only saw the headline on a feed so maybe they were talking about Pinera. The truth is that everyone is now having a very hard time with Mr Chavez, Kirchner in Arg. is in her own mess and Lula is well positioned so I think Pinera will only have trouble with Chavez but that is nothing new. I certainly don’t expect him to behave all Uribe with Chavez. Bachelet herself had a ton of trouble dealing with him and she was a soshulist.

  16. 16.

    Comrade Kevin

    January 18, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    If you want to read something about this, I suggest you go read Marc Cooper‘s post about it.

  17. 17.

    The Raven

    January 18, 2010 at 6:33 pm

    @Davis X. Machina:

    When you ask USers to name the rest of America In my experience they can reliably be counted on to produce not only Alaska but also Hawai’i. (The latter is in a mysterious box 1300 mi. southwest of San Diego. Or it was in my classroom.)

    LOL, er, krawkrawkraw.

  18. 18.

    The Raven

    January 18, 2010 at 6:41 pm

    @valdivia: I hope you and Cooper are correct. Pinera sounds like a country-club Republican to me, and those can be incredibly destructive, all the while keeping their hands lily-white clean.

  19. 19.

    valdivia

    January 18, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    @The Raven:

    well I think the US comparision doesn’t exactly work. But mainly we *have no idea* what the right in power looks like in Chile and we are about to find out. I am not bullish on the right btw, but I think Pinera is really bound by a pretty strong consensus in Chile about what is accepted policy and what isn’t. My two cents for now: pay attention to what Andres Velasco says in the future about the Pinera administration. He was the Finance minister under Bachelet and probably a future president. If he starts sounding the alarm about changes to the safety net, then you can worry, otherwise we have to wait and see.

    Ps the Cooper piece id pretty solid. I think there is much more to be said about what this really means for Chile but I will only get a crack at it later today.

  20. 20.

    sturunner

    January 18, 2010 at 7:29 pm

    Michelle had an final approval rating of ~ 80%. One of my family members spends time each year in Chile for the US GVT would largely agree w/valdivia.

    What we should be concerned about in Chile is apparently very low turnout among those who barely remember the bad years.

  21. 21.

    Dr. I. F. Stone

    January 18, 2010 at 8:01 pm

    Clearly the average Chilean is infinitely wiser and smarter than the typical duffus that clings to this blog like a snail after some poop from another animal.

  22. 22.

    New Yorker

    January 18, 2010 at 8:11 pm

    What we should be concerned about in Chile is apparently very low turnout among those who barely remember the bad years.

    So young Chileans are just as maddeningly apathetic as young Americans? Huh, maybe it’s a sign of mature democracy when a sense of entitlement sets in.

    Clearly the average Chilean is infinitely wiser and smarter than the typical duffus that clings to this blog like a snail after some poop from another animal.

    What the fuck???

    Is Mr. Stone one of our 3rd-string wingnut trolls or something? Is he praising Chileans for electing a right-winger? Should I mention that the current left-wing president has approval ratings of about 80% in the hope that his head explodes?

  23. 23.

    OriGuy

    January 18, 2010 at 9:25 pm

    Is Mr. Stone one of our 3rd-string wingnut trolls or something?

    Yes.

    SATSQ

    Now why he/she is using the name of the late left-wing journalist, is not such a simple question. Probably because blogger aimai is Stone’s granddaughter. Pretty tacky, IMO.

  24. 24.

    mds

    January 19, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    Huh, maybe it’s a sign of mature democracy when a sense of entitlement sets in.

    Also, the effect of “We approve of your party platform, but you have imperfectly implemented it, so we’re voting for the party that opposes it instead.” See also: European elections where the philosophy responsible for the global economic implosion gets rewarded at the polls. Or Massachusetts. (Yes, yes, I know it’s not all about us.)

    (And yes, Pinera has promised to carry over social policies from his predecessor, even though a “business-friendly” approach is likely to defund same. Why he sounds like quite the compassionate conservative.)

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Winter Wren - North of Quebec City (part 2 of 3) - Cap Tourmente and on the way to Tadoussac 4
Image by Winter Wren (5/16/25)

Recent Comments

  • Captain C on Squid Game (Open Thread) (May 16, 2025 @ 4:37pm)
  • RevRick on Squid Game (Open Thread) (May 16, 2025 @ 4:37pm)
  • Suzanne on Squid Game (Open Thread) (May 16, 2025 @ 4:37pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on Squid Game (Open Thread) (May 16, 2025 @ 4:34pm)
  • comrade scotts agenda of rage on Squid Game (Open Thread) (May 16, 2025 @ 4:34pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!