• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

The revolution will be supervised.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Media / We are all Roger Ailes now

We are all Roger Ailes now

by DougJ|  January 25, 201012:20 pm| 63 Comments

This post is in: Media, Good News For Conservatives

FacebookTweetEmail

Mistah Kurtz today:

Knoxville, Tenn.: Why do so many media outlets, when mentioning “Fox News”, say “which some say has conservative views”? This seems to be the equivalent of saying “The Washington Post, which some say is a newspaper…”

Why is the rest of the press corp afraid to call a spade a spade, particularly when (as in this case) it is so virulently blatant?

Howard Kurtz: Because some say a distinction must be made between Fox’s opinion shows (O’Reilly, Beck, Hannity) and its news programming. Just as you have to make a distinction between The Post’s news pages and its left-leaning editorial page.

Let’s leave aside the fact that the “left-leaning editorial page” of the Post was one of the biggest cheer-leaders for the Iraq war and so on…why on earth would Howie want to compare the Washington Post to Fox News?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Geithner’s Gulch
Next Post: Call Me, Call Me Anytime »

Reader Interactions

63Comments

  1. 1.

    Eric U.

    January 25, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    defining “left-leaning” down. If the opinion page of the WaPo was any more right-leaning, the WSJ would call to complain about unfair competition. They are “left-leaning” the way fox is fair and balanced.

  2. 2.

    Kryptik

    January 25, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    Left…leaning…edito-

    Ok, I give up, what has Kurtz been smoking?

    why on earth would Howie want to compare the Washington Post to Fox News?

    Because they keep getting scooped by Ailes and co.! What happened to their guys on the Beck beat? Move! Now! Chop-chop, before another ACORN scandal erupts!

  3. 3.

    J

    January 25, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    Sorry, my head just exploded and it is impossible to leave aside any description of the WaPo’s craptacular and wingnutty Op-Ed pages as “left-leaning.”

  4. 4.

    valdivia

    January 25, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    Fuck Howie Kurtz. That is all.

  5. 5.

    curious

    January 25, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    because for some reason he thinks they are both credible news organizations.

  6. 6.

    SpotWeld

    January 25, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    Because some say a distinction must be made between Fox’s opinion shows (O’Reilly, Beck, Hannity) and its news programming.

    …does Fox?

  7. 7.

    Third Eye Open

    January 25, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    Shorter Kurtz: “If the bottom falls out of the WaPo, I may need a job with FOX.”

  8. 8.

    beltane

    January 25, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    Just how extreme does something need to be to be counted as right-leaning these days? If the Republican party used paramilitary death squads to get their point across would Kurtz refer to them as centrists?

    This country is starting to scare me, and not in the abstract sense.

  9. 9.

    Kefauver

    January 25, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    It’s Howie Kurtz. Need you ask?

  10. 10.

    Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle

    January 25, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    Did anyone take Howie to task for calling the Kaplan Test Prep Post‘s op-ed page left-leaning?

  11. 11.

    Why oh why

    January 25, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    The WaPo has Kristol, Krauthammer, Wills, regular op-eds by Sarah Palin… but they don’t have Glenn Beck yet, so they count as “left-leaning” aka communist.

  12. 12.

    clonecone

    January 25, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    I’m sure Fox is the channel of record in the Kurtz household. Kurtz doesn’t see the bias because Fox reinforces his own conservative world view.

  13. 13.

    Mojotron

    January 25, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    Unless one of Krauthammer’s tires is flat I don’t know what he means by “left-leaning”.

  14. 14.

    Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle

    January 25, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    @Third Eye Open: Well … his wife is a Republican operative .. so you might be right .. either that .. or he’ll have to go begging to CNN to pay him more

  15. 15.

    Ugh

    January 25, 2010 at 12:29 pm

    “some say”

    WHO MUTHERFUCKER?!

  16. 16.

    PeakVT

    January 25, 2010 at 12:30 pm

    Just as you have to make a distinction between The Post’s news pages and its left-leaning editorial page.

    Hack.

  17. 17.

    Joey Maloney

    January 25, 2010 at 12:32 pm

    One of you kids correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this where one says “lolwut???”

  18. 18.

    Violet

    January 25, 2010 at 12:32 pm

    why on earth would Howie want to compare the Washington Post to Fox News?

    Because Fox News is making money. Ratings are way up. People want to associate with winners.

    Because he may need a job soon. Fox may be able to afford to hire someone.

    Because all news organizations are to be treated equally. Just as all pundits are given the same credence. Like Orly Taitz is given time to speak her mind, along with someone rational.

    Because “conservative” is considered “good,” therefore it’s good to be seen as conservative.

  19. 19.

    Warren Terra

    January 25, 2010 at 12:33 pm

    why on earth would Howie want to compare the Washington Post to Fox News?

    Maybe his CNN contract renewal is coming up and Howie wants another bidder for his favors? Maybe he’s eyeing Bernard Goldberg’s gig, complete with Regnery book contract?

    When I was home visiting family over the new year they had Fox News on, and O’Reilly was doing some sort of best-of-2009 clip show, including a segment in which he mocked his guest Bernie Goldberg for being an obvious and total nutcase. If Goldberg has too little credibility to serve O’Reilly’s purposes, Fox may need a new guy to do the job – and given Howie Kurtz’s noteworthy flexibility about conflict of interest, maybe he figures that he can keep his Washington Post and CNN contracts and pick up Bernie Goldberg’s jobs?

  20. 20.

    Cris

    January 25, 2010 at 12:34 pm

    Because some say a distinction must be made between Fox’s opinion shows (O’Reilly, Beck, Hannity) and its news programming.

    Some are apparently hopelessly naive.

  21. 21.

    Malron

    January 25, 2010 at 12:34 pm

    Because some say Howard Kurtz is an impartial, well-informed journalist but most empirical evidence points to him being beltway bobblehead who relies on fake equivalence to avoid admitting the truth about his conservative overlords.

  22. 22.

    Ella in NM

    January 25, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    …why on earth would Howie want to compare the Washington Post to Fox News?

    Because “some say” he’s an Overpaid-Beltway-Bubble-Cocktail-Party-Set tool?

  23. 23.

    Charity

    January 25, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    @Violet: And higher ratings indicate that Fox et al must be “correct.”

  24. 24.

    CalD

    January 25, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    Good-bye! Fox does straight news programming? The Washington Post has a left-leaning editorial page. I gotta admit, whatever bizarro universe that assessment came from, it sure sounds like a nicer place than here… Hello and have a nice day.

  25. 25.

    fraught

    January 25, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    It’s because Kurtz can’t dilute the saturation level of denial which the villagers must maintain that The Post is not the same cozy and warm liberal outpost that it was when Kay Graham was running it. Sally Quinn needs to have it that way and by god that’s the way it will be until she clears out and those nutty Weymouth women become the social leaders of the town.
    Howie can’t risk losing his entree to the dinner tables of Georgetown by saying the Post’s editorial page is fascisticalist.

  26. 26.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    January 25, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    Kurtz is such a douche, if that statement doesn’t qualify him for Wanker of the Week, nothing will.

    His statement about the so-called left-leaning post Editorial board is to give him and the rest of the (com)Post cover their righty reporters past and present hoping we rubes will overlook the obvious.

    As I’ve said before, I’ve been reading my home town newspaper since the 60s. It’ll never see a dime of my money again and if it goes down the toilet, I’ll applaud.

  27. 27.

    Kryptik

    January 25, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    So can we expect Bolton to become a semi-monthly addition to the op-ed page? After all, we haven’t glassed Iran yet.

    Hell, why not give Eugene Robinson the boot and install Jackson Diehl full time in his slot. Pulitzer Prizes come a dime a dozen anyways. I’m sure we can get zombie Falwell to tell us why God abhors Universal Health Care and wants a Republican Majority again.

  28. 28.

    MattF

    January 25, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    No, Howie’s right– there is a distinction, and it’s nontrivial. The ‘opinion’ shows are honestly batshit, the ‘news’ shows are dishonestly batshit.

  29. 29.

    WereBear

    January 25, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    It’s rats rearranging the dried flowers in the first class lounge of the liner that is sinking…

  30. 30.

    Michael G

    January 25, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    When he covers such hard-hitting topics like Leno v. Conan, the question occurs to me: exactly what qualifies Howie Kurtz for his job as “media critic”, over, say, any random blogger out there?

    I think Kurtz is “Joe the Plumber” with a slightly better vocabulary.

  31. 31.

    Zifnab

    January 25, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    I thought “… some say …” has always been news speak for “We think, but don’t want to admit we think that…”

    Once again, the wingers are feeling the slightest brush of pressure on their left flank and absolutely freaking out about it. I look forward to more condemnation of this obvious and derogatory left wing media bias.

  32. 32.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    January 25, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    @beltane:

    If the Republican party used paramilitary death squads to get their point across would Kurtz refer to them as centrists?

    Well… now that five thoroughly befuddled and/or hopelessly corrupted SCOTUS members have decided corporations really are MORE human than you or I and therefore really DO HAVE first amendment rights… it prolly won’t be long before they (the corps) start exercising their SECOND amendment rights too.

    Sooooooo… you might have yer death squads sooner than you think… fortunately Xe already has its guns, and prolly some tanks, and if I’m not mistaken, at least one fighter jet hidden away somewhere… ‘course, even they’ll have problems when they decide to move on S-Central LA…

    Can’t WAIT to see THAT footage on the evening news…

  33. 33.

    Shalimar

    January 25, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    Wow. Kurtz is on some serious hallucinogens if he doesn’t even know his own newspaper. Maybe The Post was left-leaning 20 years ago, but it isn’t even close now.

  34. 34.

    Ana Gama

    January 25, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    @Kryptik:

    Ok, I give up, what has Kurtz been smoking?

    Sure wish he’d pass it this way.

  35. 35.

    valdivia

    January 25, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    sort of OT but Benen FTW with this memo to the Dem leadership.

  36. 36.

    satch

    January 25, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    Thanks to Woodward and Bernstein’s MOST ungentlemanly treatment of Richard Nixon during Watergate thirty five years ago, this rag will be always and forever be known as “The Liberal Washington Post”.

  37. 37.

    fraught

    January 25, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    @Michael G: The same for most of the leading columnists. Why Modo and not Digby? Why Herbert and not John Cole? Why not Glenn Greenwald instead of Frank Rich? (Well, not such a great example.) These folks are mirages left over from the days of print hegemony. they’re like photographic negatives. Hold them up to the light and you can see right through them.

  38. 38.

    WereBear

    January 25, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    @valdivia: Excellent article.

  39. 39.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    January 25, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    Seriously…

    I haven’t owned a teleobision machine for 5 or 6 years now.

    I was at a friend’s house yesterday and watched most of both playoff games… and between halves, I was flipping channels and came across the The McLaughlin Group™ on my local PBS outlet…

    My Gawd… it was repulsive and creepy. I’ve seen bits of video on-line and read transcripts, but until you actually watch the chattering heads for 5 or 10 minutes straight, it really doesn’t hit you – just how completely and utterly those freaks are out of touch w/ reality.

    Pat Buchanan… WTF??? Isn’t he the one who actually wrote an editorial defending Hitler last year? Why isn’t this man cleaning sewers in Abu Dhabi? I can only tell you how nauseous I felt watching Pat and the Great McLaughlin Himself™ discuss Sarah Palin’s attractiveness and whether or not she had been eclipsed by the uber-hottie Scott Brown at this point…

    Oooooooooooooops…

    ***Jumps up and runs to bathroom… retching sounds in back ground***

    Sorry… couldn’t help it…

    Where was I?

    Oh… yeah… that crowd… they were like corpses that no one’s told them, they’re DEAD already, so STFU…

  40. 40.

    Keith G

    January 25, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    Doug, that made me laugh….a sad, hopeless laugh. As a centre-lefty, I feel I got nothing. The lefty media is either nonexistent, lost somewhere, or Democracy Now (god help me).

    I have President who a great guy but seems to not be running a very good White House. They can not focus a message or control a press cycle to save their/his ass. And I do not see this changing minus some historic event.

    Congress, meh.

    I haven’t missed a SOTU address since I can remember. I am not sure I can watch this one.

  41. 41.

    Brachiator

    January 25, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    Because some say a distinction must be made between Fox’s opinion shows (O’Reilly, Beck, Hannity) and its news programming.

    Fox has news programming? Is this something new?

    Kurtz is so full of it. The sad fact is that many Fox viewers assume that the crap spewed out on the station’s opinion shows are “facts” and “news.”

  42. 42.

    jibeaux

    January 25, 2010 at 1:07 pm

    @The Republic of Stupidity:

    Personally, I think progress marches on, and eventually the SCOTUS will find a right for corporations to gay marry. The upside is that it doesn’t take much to incorporate, so Adam, P.L.L.C., can marry Steve, P.C. And then pierce his corporate veil. **
    The downside is that the merger of Harpo Productions with Martha Stewart Omnimedia would no doubt unleash some sort of terrestrial apocolypse.

    ** Apologies for the lawyer joke.

  43. 43.

    arguingwithsignposts

    January 25, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    Just as you have to make a distinction between The Post’s news pages and its left-leaning editorial page.

    I would caution people about the hair-splitting Kurtz is doing here. Notice he said the “editorial page,” not the op-ed page. The distinction would be that the “editorial” position of the Post is “left-leaning.” “Op-ed,” means the page opposite the editorial page, frequently a place for people who don’t agree with the editorial position of the paper.

    So he can say what he said with a straight face and be technically correct.

    It’s a distinction that is lost on most people (especially given that their editorial page editor is the execrable Fred Hiatt), but a distinction nonetheless.

    ETA: Here’s the page with the Post’s actual editorials. Judge for yourself whether “left-leaning” or not.

  44. 44.

    jg

    January 25, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    A known right winger said the wapo ed page is left leaning and so I is? Why does the left allow this? How hard is it to point that just because the right doesn’t hear their talking points being vocalised it doesn’t mean the lefts voice is being heard?
    I say this over and over to rightis and get nothing but incredulous stares: find me a lefty who likes the so called liberal media. It can’t be liberal if liberals have a problem with it right? The right loves them some common sense, this argument should appeal to them.

  45. 45.

    JohnR

    January 25, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    “Maybe The Post was left-leaning 20 years ago, ”

    Nah; even then, it was tacking to the right. Even when Woodstein was working there, only a Nixon guy would have called the Post left-leaning. What it was, 30-odd years ago, was a newspaper with interesting editorials and opinion columns. Now it’s less interesting and accurate than the Daily News, and the editorial page is mostly cowflops with occasional flashes of thought. Kurtz is a nothing, and Hiatt is a sad little man who thinks he’s intellektchul.

  46. 46.

    licensed to kill time

    January 25, 2010 at 1:17 pm

    __

    Howard Kurtz: Because some say a distinction must be made between Fox’s opinion shows (O’Reilly, Beck, Hannity) and its news programming.

    There’s that famous philosopher SomeSay, at it again.

  47. 47.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    January 25, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    jibeaux

    The upside is that it doesn’t take much to incorporate, so Adam, P.L.L.C., can marry Steve, P.C. And then pierce his corporate veil. **

    Indeedy… indeedy… ‘n no doubt this will increase the, huh, liquidity of their assets…

  48. 48.

    ChrisWWW

    January 25, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    “[The Post’s] left-leaning editorial page.”

    Isn’t Kurtz approaching Big Lie territory with that whopper?

  49. 49.

    batgirl

    January 25, 2010 at 1:35 pm

    @licensed to kill time: I think SomeSay should become a tag! Or better yet Famous Philosopher SomeSay.

  50. 50.

    Church Lady

    January 25, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    Have no idea, although I’d say the Post’s editorial pages are about 50-50, notwithstanding their “cheerleading” for the Iraq War. I would think a more proper analogy would have been comparing Fox News to MSNBC. Both have ideological opinion programming in the evening and more or less straight news programming during the day, although both sometimes cast a partisan slant on their news programming.

    One of the few differences I’ve noticed between the two during their evening opinion shows is that the Fox shows will have on dissenting voices, but MSNBC’s shows very rarely do. I’m trying to recall ever seeing a Conservative appear of Countdown and be allowed to present their side. Has it ever happened?

  51. 51.

    ChrisWWW

    January 25, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    Church Lady,
    You’re right that Olbermann doesn’t bring on dissenters, but Maddow does. Not sure about Schultz, I’ve never watched his show.

  52. 52.

    AngusTheGodOfMeat

    January 25, 2010 at 1:42 pm

    why on earth would Howie want to compare the Washington Post to Fox News?

    For the same reason that anyone would refer to Howie for an opinion on any truth about the media?

    For the same reason that a dog licks his balls? Because he can, and it seems to feel good?

  53. 53.

    licensed to kill time

    January 25, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    @batgirl:

    Famous Philosopher SomeSay say, “All your strawmen are belong to us!”

  54. 54.

    Chad N Freude

    January 25, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    Regarding “some say”, I believe some say that this is now being taught in journalism schools as citing your sources.

  55. 55.

    Chad N Freude

    January 25, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    @licensed to kill time: I like that one.

  56. 56.

    Church Lady

    January 25, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    @ChrisWWW:

    “Not sure about Schultz, I’ve never watched his show.”

    I don’t think you’re the only one. :)

  57. 57.

    AngusTheGodOfMeat

    January 25, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    @ChrisWWW:

    Ed does bring on dissenters, and engages with them.

    I don’t care for the style of the engagements, but at least he is trying. Trying to do it, not trying my patience.

    Ed’s people seem to think that having two or three people talking over each other all at once is an interesting segment. If they can keep the flow under control, it is actually pretty interesting.

  58. 58.

    Preston

    January 25, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    So maybe the Brit, Neil Sankey can succeed where the Russian immigrant (from the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic) has failed, bring it on.

    Poor little Birthers (still in denial about their losses), Judge Land and now judge Carter, smack down the crazies (case dismissed).

    Not even “Fake News” Glenn Beck or Bill O’Reilly believes the crazies, how funny.

    To all the birthers in La, La Land, it is on you to prove to all of us that your assertion is true (TOUGH WHEN YOU KEEP LOSING CASES), if there are people who were there and support your position then show us the video (everyone has a price), either put up or frankly shut-up. I heard Orly Taitz, is selling a tape (I think it’s called “Money, Lies and Video tape”). She is from Orange County, CA, now I know what the mean when they say “behind the Orange Curtain”, when they talk about Orange County, the captial of Conspiracy Theories. You know Obama has a passport, he travel abroad before he was a Senator, but I guess they were in on it.

    In my opinion the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme religious right (people who love to push their beliefs on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate) and that’s who they need to extract from their party if they real want to win. Good Luck, because as they said in WACO, “We Ain’t Coming Out”.

    I wonder if she is a mail order bride, just like her law degree? She is perfect reporter material for “Fake News”, where unfounded rumors and innuendo reign supreme , unlike a our US courts of law, where you need to present documented facts, not half baked lies (prepare for more failures).

    A lawyer, dentist, realtor and black belt, WOW I must say a JACK of all trades master of none

    I heard that she now wants to investigate the “Republican 2009 Summer of Love” list: Assemblyman, Michael D. Duvall (CA), Senator John Ensign (NV), Senator Paul Stanley (TN), Governor Mark Stanford (SC), Board of Ed Chair, and Kristin Maguire AKA Bridget Keeney (SC). She wants to re-establish a family values party.

    I can only hope that Taitz will resist the state collectors that will be hounding her like the “ruff ruff” that she is to collect the $20K.

  59. 59.

    mistersnrub

    January 25, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    Kurtz answers four – four!! – Conan/Tonight Show related questions in this chat. This just blows my mind. The fact that this schmuck has two well-paying, prestigious jobs in today’s economic situation just so spectacularly epitomizes what is wrong with our media/political power structure. The smugness, vacuousness, laziness and intellectual dishonesty – all wrapped up in this one person, Mr. Howard Kurtz. Blegh.

  60. 60.

    Nellcote

    January 25, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    Kurtz and friends are AFRAID of Roger Ailes. They know Fox can go jihad on their asses at the drop of a hat.

  61. 61.

    DougJ

    January 25, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Have no idea, although I’d say the Post’s editorial pages are about 50-50,

    That’s about right, I think.

  62. 62.

    Mike in NC

    January 25, 2010 at 5:13 pm

    Howie long ago drank a barrel of the “Center-Right Nation” Kool-Aid that passes for conventional wisdom among Serious Thinkers inside the Beltway.

  63. 63.

    Steeplejack

    January 25, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    @DougJ:

    [. . .] why on earth would Howie want to compare the Washington Post to Fox News?

    I think he was just following on from the caller’s comparison between them.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Geminid on This Is Who They Are – Wisconsin Extremists on the Ballot on April 4 (Open Thread) (Mar 29, 2023 @ 1:19pm)
  • WaterGirl on This Is Who They Are – Wisconsin Extremists on the Ballot on April 4 (Open Thread) (Mar 29, 2023 @ 1:18pm)
  • Chief Oshkosh on This Is Who They Are – Wisconsin Extremists on the Ballot on April 4 (Open Thread) (Mar 29, 2023 @ 1:17pm)
  • WaterGirl on This Is Who They Are – Wisconsin Extremists on the Ballot on April 4 (Open Thread) (Mar 29, 2023 @ 1:15pm)
  • Roger Moore on This Is Who They Are – Wisconsin Extremists on the Ballot on April 4 (Open Thread) (Mar 29, 2023 @ 1:13pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!