• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Republicans in disarray!

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

Bark louder, little dog.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

The press swings at every pitch, we don’t have to.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

A tremendous foreign policy asset… to all of our adversaries.

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

We’re watching the self-immolation of the leading world power on a level unprecedented in human history.

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

Well, whatever it is, it’s better than being a Republican.

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Weird. Rome has an American Pope and America has a Russian President.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / We are all teatards now

We are all teatards now

by DougJ|  April 15, 201010:55 pm| 74 Comments

This post is in: General Stupidity, Good News For Conservatives, We Are All Mayans Now

FacebookTweetEmail

I realize I shouldn’t continue to read the Kaplan opinion page, let alone link to it, but this Caddell-Schoen piece reads like a parody, from the multiple citations of Rasmussen polls to this:

To turn a corner, Democrats need to start embracing an agenda that speaks to the broad concerns of the American electorate. It should be somewhat familiar: It is the agenda that is driving the Tea Party movement and one that has the capacity to motivate a broadly based segment of the electorate.

Is FreedomWorks directly paying these guys? Seriously. What is going on here?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The politics of financial reform
Next Post: Confederate History Month: Night Riders »

Reader Interactions

74Comments

  1. 1.

    Phoenician in a time of Romans

    April 15, 2010 at 11:01 pm

    Man, it’s obvious that if the Democrats “embraced an agenda” which deliberately went out and pissed off the teabaggers, they’d lose nothing and probably firm up their support and energise people who would actually vote for them.

    They’re not goddamned swing voters. They’re people who think the Republicans aren’t rabidly right-wing enough.

  2. 2.

    El Cid

    April 15, 2010 at 11:01 pm

    A Democratic resurgence is inevitable once the party turns toward investigating Obama’s birth certificate and vowing to declare health care reform un-Constitutional, as well as cuttin’ all the taxes and stoppin’ all da spendin’.

  3. 3.

    DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal)

    April 15, 2010 at 11:02 pm

    Fuck you but no thanks, I will never be a teabagger. Now teabaggee is a whole ‘nuther thing…

    They are probably being paid to provide the knob polishing that goes with a good teabagging.

  4. 4.

    Menzies

    April 15, 2010 at 11:02 pm

    I’m honestly speechless.

    Exactly how is the Tea Party series-of-loose-planks-that-they-call-a-platform going to motivate any kind of “broadly based segment of the electorate?” Do these people not realize that this movement is so fractious that the only thing holding it together is their opposition to the Democrats, or – since apparently now we can’t say that ’cause they endorsed Minnick – “big government?”

    You know what, maybe it would be a good idea for the Democrats to do that. Then the teatards would have nothing to direct their anger at and go reach to insubstantiality.

  5. 5.

    David in NY

    April 15, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    Feh.

  6. 6.

    Crashman

    April 15, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    To turn a corner, Democrats need to start embracing an agenda that speaks to the broad concerns of the American electorate. It should be somewhat familiar: It is the agenda that is driving the Tea Party movement and one that has the capacity to motivate a broadly based segment of the electorate.

    Sooo… Let’s see, that advice would consist of:

    1. Every government program is evil except the one I’m enrolled in.
    2. black people=scary!
    3. ???
    4. Electoral Victory!

  7. 7.

    Arclite

    April 15, 2010 at 11:06 pm

    Heh.

    I just saw “Han Shot First” byline under the Ballon Juice logo.

    Classic.

  8. 8.

    General Egali Tarian Stuck

    April 15, 2010 at 11:07 pm

    Caddell is a bug fuck crazy Clenis bottom feeder consultant type that is pissed cause the cool kids in DC are no longer interested is his wingnut light consulting/

  9. 9.

    Culture of Truth

    April 15, 2010 at 11:11 pm

    um, yeah.

    Remind me – who has the House, the Senate and the Presidency?

  10. 10.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    April 15, 2010 at 11:13 pm

    to motivate a broadly based segment of the electorate.

    That would be the segment that lives in Amurika , right? Thank god I live in America, were, according to a CBS poll today, 82% could give a fuck about teabaggers.

  11. 11.

    CynDee

    April 15, 2010 at 11:13 pm

    @General Egali Tarian Stuck: Wow, that’s the finest line to be heard since One-Eyed Jacks, when after beating Karl Malden into the saloon floor, Marlon Brando said to him, “Get up, you scum-suckin’ pig.”

  12. 12.

    Eljai

    April 15, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    Caddell and Schoen raise cherry picking to a whole new level that, quite frankly, has my consciousness exploding like glassy shards of spittle from a Glenn Beck rant. Which reminds me, there have been innertoob sightings of Caddell commiseratin’ with the frothy one about such things as oh, say, Van Jones’ questionable past. Yet, Caddell and Schoen describe themselves as democratic pollsters. My. Ass.

  13. 13.

    socraticsilence

    April 15, 2010 at 11:15 pm

    I don’t know it seems like it’d be hard for Obama to embrace a movement based on hating Obama and a general fear of Brown people.

  14. 14.

    Ash Can

    April 15, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    Somebody needs to break it to these poor idiots that 18% is not “a broadly based segment of the electorate.”

  15. 15.

    kommrade reproductive vigor

    April 15, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    Thou shalt not question the story arc!

  16. 16.

    joel hanes

    April 15, 2010 at 11:19 pm

    Magical thinking seemed to work so well for these guys during Bush 43. They became convinced that they created their own reality by saying what they wished were true.

    It’s hard for them to give it up.

  17. 17.

    max hats

    April 15, 2010 at 11:21 pm

    Doug J, you need to own up to the terrifying truth: this is what these people actually believe.

  18. 18.

    slippy

    April 15, 2010 at 11:21 pm

    @kommrade reproductive vigor: I’m scratching my head wondering when the media will start reading the polls and figuring out that they lost control of the narrative months ago.

    They’ve relentlessly pushed this “teabagger anger” bullshine on us practically all year. I saw a front page story about it today in one of our local papers here in Indiana. And even with all this pole-vaulting of a minor political squib of a movement into the stratosphere of exposure, they’ve failed to gather more than 18% support. Their ability to distract America from our real concerns is vastly overrated, and seems to have almost utterly vanished in this case.

  19. 19.

    Stroszek

    April 15, 2010 at 11:22 pm

    And here’s the media to the rescue.

    Courtesy of Reuters, all he-said/she-said, no fact checks, and naturally, the first paragraph is nothing more than a laundry list of GOP talking points:

    After talks in the White House, Republicans ripped into a Democratic reform bill, saying it would protect big banks, hurt small banks and guarantee “endless taxpayer bailouts of Wall Street.”

    Dems need to move fast and capitalize on the frayed nerves.

  20. 20.

    DougJ

    April 15, 2010 at 11:22 pm

    @max hats:

    Doug J, you need to own up to the terrifying truth: this is what these people actually believe.

    That really made me laugh, because it really would be terrifying.

  21. 21.

    Menzies

    April 15, 2010 at 11:24 pm

    @Stroszek:

    This. Luckily Harry Reid seems to have found his testicles. Guess they were particularly well-hidden.

  22. 22.

    joeyess

    April 15, 2010 at 11:24 pm

    Pat Caddell?? He’s a fucking jagoff of epic proportions.

  23. 23.

    melmoth

    April 15, 2010 at 11:25 pm

    Why must you place this crapulence in front of us? Who the hell takes the WashPost op-ed page seriously? We all know these writers are a pair of hacks. stop torturing yourself and us with this manure.

  24. 24.

    forked tongue

    April 15, 2010 at 11:28 pm

    Jesus God. I’m so old I remember a time when Patrick Caddell was sort of a welcome presence on the teevee bobblefests. Back in the 80s. I also seem to vaguely remember Jay Leno being kinda funny back then, so don’t go by my memory.

  25. 25.

    DonkeyKong

    April 15, 2010 at 11:28 pm

    Harry Reid has always been a fierce tucker.

  26. 26.

    zhak

    April 15, 2010 at 11:29 pm

    I’ve got an amazing idea the Dems might consider embracing: the truth. Instead of tacking toward the folks that are all worked up based on lies & their own unresolved issues, why not actually base their ideas on a more reality-based foundation & get some good stuff done?

    Countering the lies would be a good start, in fact.

  27. 27.

    DougJ

    April 15, 2010 at 11:34 pm

    @zhak:

    why not actually base their ideas on a more reality-based foundation & get some good stuff done?

    Amen.

  28. 28.

    mr. whipple

    April 15, 2010 at 11:40 pm

    @Stroszek:

    And here’s the media to the rescue.

    And here’s another, from the Lexington Herald-Leader(read the whole thing, it’s awesome):

    “McConnell’s statements are perfectly calibrated to inflame the public. He insists the bill would “allow endless taxpayer-funded bailouts for big Wall Street banks.”

    Their resemblance to the truth is another matter.

    The provision that McConnell claims would allow endless bailouts emerged from a bipartisan collaboration by Sens. Mark Warner, D-Va., and Bob Corker, R-Tenn.

    Warner, who learned a thing or two about capitalism as a successful dot.com entrepreneur before becoming Virginia’s governor, told The Washington Post: “It appears that the Republican leader either doesn’t understand or chooses not to understand the basic underlying premise of what this bill puts in place.”

    The provision to which McConnell particularly objects creates an orderly process for letting “too big to fail” banks fail, at the industry’s expense, without taking down the entire economy.

    The losers would be the management and shareholders, not the taxpayers. So onerous would this process be for failing financial institutions, says Warner, that it would serve as a deterrent to reckless decision-making.”

    kentucky.com/2010/04/15/1224749/mcconnell-to-big-banks-rescue.html

  29. 29.

    encephalopath

    April 15, 2010 at 11:43 pm

    @9 Culture of Truth

    Yep… if Democrats would “start embracing an agenda that speaks to the broad concerns of the American electorate” they just might win the White House and both houses of Congress.

    They could really get somewhere. People would vote for them and stuff. Oh… that happened already?

  30. 30.

    Shalimar

    April 15, 2010 at 11:44 pm

    I’m trying to imagine the resulting stream of vulgarity if someone had tried to tell LBJ that he really needed to embrace the Bircher agenda if he wanted to get anything passed.

  31. 31.

    Mark S.

    April 15, 2010 at 11:47 pm

    They must adopt an agenda aimed at reducing the debt, with an emphasis on tax cuts

    Oooookay. This is the second time today I’ve seen this ridiculous argument. Take it away, Amity:

    But the results may also mean that Tea Party supporters don’t believe tax cuts are necessarily the cause of deficits, and may believe that tax cuts narrow deficits.

    We should definitely listen to these people who are so grounded in reality.

    Speaking of Amity, this was her argument that teabaggers aren’t racist:

    In question No. 2, both Tea Party supporters and subjects from the general public are asked what they like best about President Obama. The same share amount — 1 percent — say the thing they liked best was that he was black.

    I’m not surprised that ridiculous answer wasn’t very popular.

    Yet 11 percent of Tea Party supporters said that what they liked best about the president was that he was intelligent, while only 6 percent of the general population said that intelligence was their favorite attribute of Mr. Obama. Asked what they liked least about Mr. Obama, and offered the option of answering “He’s Muslim,” only a tiny share of both groups, 1 percent, chose that description for their dislike. These responses undercut the argument that Tea Partyism is racism.

    Um, oh fuck it, I have no idea why these ludicrous statistics prove anything one way or the other.

  32. 32.

    Allan

    April 15, 2010 at 11:48 pm

    Can someone help me with a Venn diagram of “white racists” and “Obama voters” please?

    I’m having trouble figuring out how many miles apart to place the circles.

  33. 33.

    Allan

    April 15, 2010 at 11:51 pm

    Oh, and someone should check on Broder.

    He’s been in the can with that column for like, hours.

  34. 34.

    Allan

    April 15, 2010 at 11:53 pm

    @Bad Horse’s Filly:

    to motivate a broadly based segment of the electorate.

    I think that’s just a PC way of saying “fat people.”

  35. 35.

    rob!

    April 15, 2010 at 11:55 pm

    Jesus Christ, Washington Punditry is a sick, sick bunch of folks. They’re so fucking worried about seeming like “the elite” they’ll compliment any screaming nutjob, as long as he comes from “the heartland.”

    Ick.

  36. 36.

    GregB

    April 15, 2010 at 11:58 pm

    From Wiki:

    In 1988, Caddell left the Democratic Party after an acrimonious lawsuit with a Democratic consulting firm. Republicans would often cite Caddell’s tirades against the Democratic Party on the floor of the House and the Senate.

    This douchebag has been Democrat bashing for 22 years.

    Fox only has one bigger scumbag on their payroll and that is the repulsive Dick Morris.

  37. 37.

    Lurking Canadian

    April 15, 2010 at 11:59 pm

    Mark S. at 30 got there before me, but this:

    They must adopt an agenda aimed at reducing the debt, with an emphasis on tax cuts, while implementing carefully crafted initiatives to stimulate and encourage job creation.

    is so absurd that it needs to be said twice. Reducing the debt with an emphasis on tax cuts. While carefully crafting initiatives to stimulate the economy.

    Did even Laffer think that was possible? I mean, he thought tax cuts could pay for themselves, but did even he claim they would not just pay for themselves, but pay for other stuff, too? How much monkey crack do you need to smoke before that makes sense?

  38. 38.

    Allan

    April 16, 2010 at 12:03 am

    @Lurking Canadian:

    How much monkey crack do you need to smoke before that makes sense?

    You just have accept that you lack any actual talent and can only succeed as a dependent on the wingnut welfare state. Then it becomes pure self-interest.

    The lies don’t stick in your throat when you’re washing them down with Cristal, baby.

  39. 39.

    gbear

    April 16, 2010 at 12:05 am

    @Shalimar:

    I’m trying to imagine the resulting stream of vulgarity if someone had tried to tell LBJ that he really needed to embrace the Bircher agenda if he wanted to get anything passed.

    It would probably sound a lot like this LBJ quote to an obnoxious reporter:

    You’re asking the leader of the Western world a chickenshit question like that?

    How many times a day do you suppose Obama thinks that? It’s fun to imagine what LBJ would say if he were dealing with today’s DC press.

  40. 40.

    Allan

    April 16, 2010 at 12:08 am

    @Lurking Canadian: And also too, this column was generated using LuntzPro, a new application that generates focus-tested buzz words in grammatical sentences that have the feel of truthiness without requiring any actual ideas.

  41. 41.

    Cliff

    April 16, 2010 at 12:11 am

    The real question is, how does DougJ read these assholes every day and not realize some fundamental truths about how they think?

    What is going on here?

    What’s going on here is that THEY’RE ASSHOLES.

    They’re assholes, and they or their editors are getting money jammed down their throats so hard that they can’t think of anything else besides being an asshole.

  42. 42.

    jl

    April 16, 2010 at 12:15 am

    These two people are pure hacks. They seem vaguely familiar from past elections but I don’t pay enough attention to remember who all these hired flacks are.

    The column makes no sense, except as mindless superficial poll driven crystal ball gazing in a seance run by a drunk.

    This part was priceless:
    “And the Tea Party movement stands for fiscal discipline, limited government and balancing the budget”

    How does the insane teabagger desire to keep Medicare just exactly the way it is, and from the reception of Palin’s blather, run a world military empire of domination (USA USA!) and reducing taxes even further square with balancing the budget and fiscal responsibility?

    Oh, that’s right, they want to eliminate the budget rounding error that is US foreign aid funding. That’ll fix it.

    The teabaggers are pathetic innumerate scared bitter white people who are afraid the gummint is going to take their stuff, while they run around to stupid rallies with their inane illiterate signs, that are sponsored by rich money bags who scheme how to take all their stuff night and day.

    I read something somewhere recently about how they are similar to the white South Africans who wanted their white pampered social welfare state just for them and nobody else, everything else, including reality, be damned.

  43. 43.

    Mark S.

    April 16, 2010 at 12:16 am

    Oh, I finally get why 11% of teabaggers saying the best thing about Obama is his intelligence proves they aren’t racist, because if you are actually racist, you wouldn’t think a black person is intelligent.

    I still don’t know why the Muslim thing means you aren’t racist. That would be like proving someone isn’t homophobic because they don’t dislike Bush because he is a lesbian.

    Is Shales’ book about the Great Depression this stupid? I think I would kill myself if I had to read hundreds of pages of this woman.

  44. 44.

    DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal)

    April 16, 2010 at 12:17 am

    Mr. Fix’t to the rescue!

    Can someone help me with a Venn diagram of “white racists” and “Obama voters” please?
     
    I’m having trouble figuring out how many miles light-years apart to place the circles.

    Fix’t.

  45. 45.

    soonergrunt

    April 16, 2010 at 12:24 am

    Not that anyone will notice, but I’m taking some time off from all the blogs and such.
    The crazy-making from both sides is getting to me a little too much.
    Hell, the only reason I’m mentioning this is because I’m just vain enough to think someone WILL notice and care. That itself is enough reason to take a break.

  46. 46.

    DougJ

    April 16, 2010 at 12:27 am

    @soonergrunt:

    You won’t be able to stay away.

  47. 47.

    Mike in NC

    April 16, 2010 at 12:27 am

    WaPo + teatards = match made in heaven

  48. 48.

    Will

    April 16, 2010 at 12:28 am

    Pat Caddell is the original PUMA. He has been concern-trolling the Democratic Party for almost 30 years.

  49. 49.

    Yutsano

    April 16, 2010 at 12:39 am

    @soonergrunt: FWIW I’ll miss your witty reparteé, not to mention your very much appreciated insight on military issues. Unless this is related to the job search, stick around for a bit plz.

  50. 50.

    jacy

    April 16, 2010 at 12:41 am

    @soonergrunt:

    Yeah, yeah, and every time Cole posts something like that, it’s immediatly followed by eleventy-billion posts.

    But if you do manage it, have fun, so we can live vicariously through you when you return to enthrall us with your exploits in the “real” world that I’ve heard so much about. :)

  51. 51.

    Brick Oven Bill

    April 16, 2010 at 12:42 am

    Mark S. teaches us:

    “That would be like proving someone isn’t homophobic because they don’t dislike Bush because he is a lesbian.”

    I know lesbians Mark S.

    George Bush is no lesbian.

    Lesbians as a rule do not delight in cooking, to their detriment. Teabaggers cook with zeal, but never with Rachel Ray or Mario Batali nameplate cookware. We understand that these are just cheap rip-offs and instead use cast iron, available at your local thrift-store. Probably originating from someone who is now dead.

    But this does not matter to us.

    Women and food being the essence of our experience. Perhaps also the occasional tobacco product. Soonergrunt is a puss Yutsano. Listen instead to me.

  52. 52.

    Yutsano

    April 16, 2010 at 12:46 am

    Soonergrunt is a puss Yutsano. Listen instead to me.

    When you’ve puked your guts out and sweated your ass of going through boot camp while learning to fire a gun and the limits of your physical and mental being and pushing just beyond that, I might just consider your assertion. Until then piss off.

  53. 53.

    LD50

    April 16, 2010 at 12:49 am

    @gbear:

    How many times a day do you suppose Obama thinks that? It’s fun to imagine what LBJ would say if he were dealing with today’s DC press.

    My favorite LBJ bon mot was “boys, I may not know much, but I know the difference between chicken shit and chicken salad”.

    That was back when Texas still had some elected politicians who weren’t repulsive buffoons.

  54. 54.

    Martin

    April 16, 2010 at 12:51 am

    @Yutsano:

    When you’ve puked your guts out and sweated your ass of going through boot camp while learning to fire a gun and the limits of your physical and mental being and pushing just beyond that, I might just consider your assertion.

    Cut BOB some slack. Remember, Al Franken tried to touch his wiener at the Harvest House buffet, so he’s been there, man.

  55. 55.

    Tattoosydney

    April 16, 2010 at 12:52 am

    @soonergrunt:

    Not that anyone will notice, but I’m taking some time off from all the blogs and such.

    We’ll notice.

    You should do what I do and read only threads that involve doggies, cats, product blegs, cooking, art of naked mopping. It makes the world seem a much nicer place.

  56. 56.

    trollhattan

    April 16, 2010 at 12:53 am

    It’s pretty clear they’re losing whatever tepid mojo they may have once had, whilst harvesting Roger Simon dollars.

    Teabonics lives on, however

    farm5.static.flickr.com/4029/4525186416_9e5e3e3b7c_o.jpg

  57. 57.

    DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal)

    April 16, 2010 at 12:55 am

    @soonergrunt:

    Who are you? Am I supposed to care if you are taking a break? For all I know you could be a serial murderer in here announcing that you are taking a break from killing!

    psst… think this will fool him into staying?

  58. 58.

    Yutsano

    April 16, 2010 at 12:58 am

    @Tattoosydney: Not that I’m bragging or anything, but BoB just tried to get my attention, in a rather weak attempt, but I’ll take it for now. Granted it’s not the blatant flirting you get, but baby steps man, baby steps.

    O-genki ka? It’s my Friday and I don’t think I’m fully recovered from Arizona yet.

  59. 59.

    DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal)

    April 16, 2010 at 1:00 am

    @Yutsano:

    BOB goes through this every single day when he gets ready for work.

  60. 60.

    Yutsano

    April 16, 2010 at 1:05 am

    @DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal): I’d only believe this if the lesbyterian forklift driver (the existence of which I am not entirely convinced of) wakes his sorry ass out of bed every morning. Otherwise I refuse to believe he’s anywhere near that tough. Why yes, yes I am in a feisty mood why do you ask? :)

  61. 61.

    Brick Oven Bill

    April 16, 2010 at 1:09 am

    Sun Tzu teaches us:

    Disciplined and calm, to await the appearance of disorder and hubbub amongst the enemy:–this is the art of retaining self-possession.

    Do not swallow bait offered by the enemy. Do not interfere with an army that is returning home.

    When you surround an army, leave an outlet free. Do not press a desperate foe too hard.

    So I am sorry for calling you a puss Soonergrunt.

    + several

  62. 62.

    Jeff Fecke

    April 16, 2010 at 1:22 am

    @Lurking Canadian:

    Come on, everyone knows that tax cuts automatically mean higher revenues. Also, wishes are horses, and beggars are riding.

  63. 63.

    Joey Maloney

    April 16, 2010 at 1:29 am

    @Lurking Canadian:

    How much monkey crack do you need to smoke fuck before that makes sense?

    Fixt for standard Republican predilictions.

  64. 64.

    pj

    April 16, 2010 at 1:31 am

    @CynDee:

    Ben Johnson, not Karl Malden. Here’s the scene. Calling Slim Pickens a “big tub o’ guts” was a winner, too. Also.

  65. 65.

    asiangrrlMN

    April 16, 2010 at 2:00 am

    @soonergrunt: I’ll miss you, soonergrunt. I really enjoy reading your commentary. But, take the break if it’s what you need.

    Hi FH#1 & 2!

  66. 66.

    DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal)

    April 16, 2010 at 2:02 am

    @Yutsano:

    I should have added “In BOB’s mind, …” to the post above. Sorry about that oversight. ;)

    “lesbyterian”? lol! He only thinks that to assuage his ego after having been rejected by said lesbyterian.

  67. 67.

    Anne Laurie

    April 16, 2010 at 2:07 am

    @soonergrunt:

    Not that anyone will notice, but I’m taking some time off from all the blogs and such.

    You will be missed, sir. I will live on the hope that you’ll return refreshed, and with happy tales of a new job.

  68. 68.

    Yutsano

    April 16, 2010 at 2:08 am

    @asiangrrlMN: I, for one, hope we can convince him to stick around for a spell. He is one of my favorite commenters here for sure and I always know I’m going to either learn something or enjoy his feistiness. But I can also appreciate the necessity of breaking away.

    @DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal): Oh now I get it. He’s still getting a bone for Rachel. This explains much.

  69. 69.

    Beej

    April 16, 2010 at 2:30 am

    Have these idiots bothered to look at any polling stats to see what percentage of the electorate is actually represented by the tea partiers? Read something on kos not long ago. I think it was something like 1-2%. Oh yeah, the Democrats should all gather round and take lessons from the teabaggers. Oh yes. That will certainly win them elections. What in the hell are these jerks smoking?

  70. 70.

    Tattoosydney

    April 16, 2010 at 2:41 am

    @Yutsano:

    Not that I’m bragging or anything, but BoB just tried to get my attention, in a rather weak attempt, but I’ll take it for now.

    Be careful – it’s only a little step from Bob flirting with you to full on sexing against the pizza oven. Remeber he does sell sex toys.

    BoB wants to sex you! BoB wants to sex you!

  71. 71.

    DougL (frmrly: Conservatively Liberal)

    April 16, 2010 at 2:45 am

    @Tattoosydney:

    No shit. Then he will try to pull a(n electric) train on you.

  72. 72.

    Nellcote

    April 16, 2010 at 3:30 am

    Creating and reporting on their own reality. The possiblities are frightening.

  73. 73.

    Arclite

    April 16, 2010 at 5:01 am

    Does anyone know why T-Rex’s blog (iamtrex.com/) stops at Dec 3, 2009?

  74. 74.

    Remember November

    April 16, 2010 at 9:16 am

    Since when is 18% a broad sampling of the electorate? Oh right, Friedman unit mathematics. 6 People=600 people=6 million people

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - TKH - Patagonia-los lagunas y glaciares 4
Photo by TKH (1/24/26)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Order Your Pet Calendars!

Order Calendar A

Order Calendar B

 

Recent Comments

  • Peke Daddy on What Would Thomas Jefferson and John Adams Do?* (Jan 24, 2026 @ 7:07pm)
  • Bupalos on There Is No Safe Way (Jan 24, 2026 @ 7:06pm)
  • TS on What Would Thomas Jefferson and John Adams Do?* (Jan 24, 2026 @ 7:05pm)
  • Nukular Biskits on What Would Thomas Jefferson and John Adams Do?* (Jan 24, 2026 @ 7:05pm)
  • YY_Sima Qian on There Is No Safe Way (Jan 24, 2026 @ 7:05pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!