• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

We do not need to pander to people who do not like what we stand for.

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

The most dangerous place for a black man in America is in a white man’s imagination.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

People really shouldn’t expect the government to help after they watched the GOP drown it in a bathtub.

Weird. Rome has an American Pope and America has a Russian President.

Jack be nimble, jack be quick, hurry up and indict this prick.

How any woman could possibly vote for this smug smarmy piece of misogynistic crap is beyond understanding.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Live so that if you miss a day of work people aren’t hoping you’re dead.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” was supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

I’m more christian than these people and i’m an atheist.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / They’re Also Against Aids, Cancer, and Heart Attacks

They’re Also Against Aids, Cancer, and Heart Attacks

by John Cole|  April 19, 20102:27 pm| 77 Comments

This post is in: Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

A bold statement from Lloyd Bankfein:

This is Lloyd on Sunday in New York. Following my message to you on Friday, I wanted to update all of you and let you know that we have been taking all appropriate steps to defend the firm and its reputation. As we prepare for the opening of markets around the world, I want to remind all of you of the fundamental values that have served Goldman Sachs throughout our history: teamwork, excellence, and service to our clients. The extensive media coverage on the SEC’s complaint is certainly uncomfortable, but given the anger directed at financial services, not completely surprising. Still, it is important to put the SEC’s action in context. The core of the SEC’s case is the allegation that one employee misled two professional investors by failing to disclose the role of another market participant in a transaction. Importantly, we had assumed risk in the deal and we lost money, just like the other two long investors. I will repeat what you have heard me say many times in the past: Goldman Sachs has never condoned and would never condone inappropriate activity by any of our people.

So the three-pronged defense from Goldman is:

1.) We didn’t do anything wrong
2.) If we did do anything wrong, it was just a few bad apples
3.) We’re against wrong, as I’ve said lots of times!

Good luck with that, Lloyd!

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Three spheres
Next Post: Things We Can’t and Won’t Do »

Reader Interactions

77Comments

  1. 1.

    mr. whipple

    April 19, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    Banksters!

  2. 2.

    El Cid

    April 19, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    We deeply apologize if any inconvenience our actions were interpreted as having caused you in any way reflected badly upon our image or otherwise made our activities more difficult to pursue.

  3. 3.

    mr. whipple

    April 19, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    Goldman Sachs has never condoned and would never condone inappropriate activity by any of our people.

    This is what they should have said Friday.

  4. 4.

    kommrade reproductive vigor

    April 19, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    At least they’re not blaming ACORN.

    Yet.

  5. 5.

    Mr. Poppinfresh

    April 19, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    John, you forgot:

    4) Even if we did rob this bank and steal millions, we totally had $57.60 in an e-savings account at that branch, and so we were a victim too!

  6. 6.

    Face

    April 19, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    Goldman Sachs has never condoned and would never condone inappropriate activity by any of our people.

    Pretty sure the key hedge here is “people”. These fucking monsters aren’t people, by any common definition.

  7. 7.

    licensed to kill time

    April 19, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    I like the bit about “since we lost money, too” , it’s all good. See, we even duped ourselves! D’oh!

  8. 8.

    geg6

    April 19, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    As happy as I am to see GS taking some heat, the real criminals are still seen as oracles:

    thenation.com/doc/20100503/hayes

    I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that Chris Hayes is a national treasure and should be cloned so that he can take his reportorial skills to every medium he can.

  9. 9.

    EconWatcher

    April 19, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    Actually, I think this message shows an interesting shift from the original Friday response: The firm is noticeably distancing itself from the “one employee,” whereas Friday was a full-throated denial.

  10. 10.

    Balconesfault

    April 19, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    If they really lost money on the deal, I’m expecting that those involved got shit-canned … or at least had their bonuses cut that year.

    Call me jaded … I’m betting that when the dust clears, including all related transactions and fees, there was not a net Goldman loss.

  11. 11.

    Midnight Marauder

    April 19, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    Goldman Sachs has never condoned and would never condone inappropriate activity by any of our people.

    I like this.

    “We do not, and never would, approve of fraud. Now whether we would actually commit fraud and proceed to turn it into a sizable portion of our profit model…well now, that’s a whole different story!
    __
    But no, we do not approve of fraud.”

  12. 12.

    Eric U.

    April 19, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    I think they read the article by Sam Antar about how they were screwing themselves. I found it amusing that he thinks the SEC does this on purpose for what amount to personal reasons. It’s probably more complex than that, but I’m guessing the thought of people at Goldman stewing all weekend didn’t hurt anyone’s feelings at the SEC

  13. 13.

    MattF

    April 19, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    Well, of all things… the magic of the marketplace is apparently having some effect. However, it’s still unclear to me how anyone in their right mind could ever trust Goldman Sachs in a deal. But we shall see… I suspect, in any event, that the Fabulous Frenchman, M. Fabrice Tourre, is feeling a little pressure at this very moment.

  14. 14.

    Fleas correct the era

    April 19, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    If they really lost money on the deal, I’m expecting that those involved got shit-canned … or at least had their bonuses cut that year.

    Oh, yes indeed. By at least five dollars. And you know that’s gonna leave a mark! How they must have suffered…

  15. 15.

    Rommie

    April 19, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    I am shocked, shocked, that you think we condone gambling on the premises!

  16. 16.

    Violet

    April 19, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    Goldman Sachs has never condoned and would never condone inappropriate activity by any of our people.

    This is like saying, “We’re against bad things.” In the real world where the rest of us live, this means nothing.

    “Inappropriate activity?” Is this what we’re calling lying, cheating, and stealing these days?

  17. 17.

    Osprey

    April 19, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    They should lather up Mr. Blankfein in the spiciest buffalo wing sauce they can find, then submerge him in a tank full of bullet ants.

    Yes, ants en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraponera

  18. 18.

    Fleas correct the era

    April 19, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    “Inappropriate activity?” Is this what we’re calling lying, cheating, and stealing these days?

    Getting caught.

  19. 19.

    DanF

    April 19, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    4) We want all Americans to know that we are also against the violent rape and murder of puppies.

  20. 20.

    Calouste

    April 19, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    Just reading between the lines of Mr. Bankfine:

    the fundamental values that have served Goldman Sachs throughout our history: teamwork, excellence, and service to our clients.

    Honesty and integrity are apparently not fundamental values at GS.

    Goldman Sachs has never condoned and would never condone inappropriate activity by any of our people.

    I guess that depends on what Mr. Bankfine means with “inappropriate”. Giving a sucker an even brake would pretty much be frowned upon at GS.

  21. 21.

    rootless-e

    April 19, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    I finally figured out why I can’t share the Goldman indignation. I feel like I’m being asked to get angry at Omar Little for stealing from crack dealers. Of course, Omar had a moral code, so that’s different, but …

  22. 22.

    flukebucket

    April 19, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    Okay. It is driving me crazy. There was a woman who tried to warn everybody back during the Clinton administration that there needed to be more government regulation in the trading of derivatives.

    Seems like her name was Britlee Bourne or something like that.

    Anybody remember?

    The core of the SEC’s case is the allegation that one employee misled two professional investors

    We will soon hear more than we ever cared to hear about the Lynndie England of Goldman Sachs.

  23. 23.

    geg6

    April 19, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    OT, but John, if you’re still in a bad mood and need a giggle, read this about how Miley Cyrus is a Saul Alinsky mole, conspiring against the good conservatives who created and still run country music:

    yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/04/is-miley-cyrus-an-alinskyite-mole-sent-to-brainwash-coun…

    Best laugh in weeks.

  24. 24.

    kay

    April 19, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    @EconWatcher:

    The firm is noticeably distancing itself from the “one employee,” whereas Friday was a full-throated denial.

    I agree. I think it’s a good sign, if you’re the SEC.

  25. 25.

    DanF

    April 19, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    And no skull-fucking. I know that’s going to make some of our investors wince, but morally, Goldman Sachs will not tolerate skull-fucking in the office. Our board has thought long and hard about skull-fucking, and through much soul searching, we believe this is correct position for our company in these troubled times.

  26. 26.

    Cat Lady

    April 19, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    @EconWatcher:

    It’s good news for the SEC. The Fabulous Fab is a young guy who doesn’t want to spend the rest of his life poor and/or in jail. He’s not going down alone. Popcorn!

  27. 27.

    EdTheRed

    April 19, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    Jesus H…are these guys just completely incapable of releasing a public statement that doesn’t open them up to even more civil liability?

  28. 28.

    Cat Lady

    April 19, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    @flukebucket:

    Brooksley Born. It’s always the women who try to save us from ourselves.

  29. 29.

    JGabriel

    April 19, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    Lloyd Blankfein:

    Importantly, we had assumed risk in the deal and we lost money, just like the other two long investors.

    Interesting. How much did they make in fees off of the clients? Including Paulson?

    .

  30. 30.

    R. Porrofatto

    April 19, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    I don’t work on Wall St but I’ve worked with many WS businesses and mid-level guys. As people they are no different than anyone else – some decent, some complete assholes. What differentiates them from the rest of us, though, are the torrents of money they swim in, and the arrogant self-worth imbued in them by so much easy money to be had. Ordinary Americans have very little idea of just how much of their own work they’ve had to sacrifice to give these parasites incomes and net worth that is hundreds of times larger than the the average worker* – if we can even use “work” in this context. They are literally laughing all the way to the bank and it’s a very short ride.

    Considering the billions these people accumulated legally (after getting Congress to declare it legal of course) makes it all the more stunning just how unnecessary committing fraud was. Like their organized crime counterparts, it was so easy they simply couldn’t help themselves

    *Think a half million dollars per year would be a handsome income which would take care of every need and want of your family, with a nice estate for your granchildren and then some? Well, if you made $500,000 every single year since the birth of Christ – 2000 years – you’d have made one billion dollars. John Paulson, at the core of the fraud du jour, made four billion in one year, 2007. And so did David Tepper in 2009, one of the worst years since the Great Depression for the rest of us.

  31. 31.

    JGabriel

    April 19, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    @Calouste:

    Giving a sucker an even brake would pretty much be frowned upon at GS.

    Goddamnit! Not only are they scamming our banks, now they’re sabotaging our automotive vehicles! Those bastards!

    .

  32. 32.

    flukebucket

    April 19, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    @Cat Lady:

    Thank you so much. That was driving me nuts. I was googling it every way I knew possible and I couldn’t come up with it.

    I watched an NPR special on Brooklsey Born once with my wife and from time to time my wife would give me that “men are such dumb asses” look.

    At the time I had to agree with her.

  33. 33.

    jl

    April 19, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    Is having the company’s CEO in private meetings to get special gummint treatment in the middle of a financial panic ‘inappropriate’?

    Or just recognition of the company’s special status and role in gaining control of fianncial assets by any means necessary, er, sorry, I mean just recognition the companies vital public service role in the financial markets of the nation?

  34. 34.

    Tsulagi

    April 19, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    1.) We didn’t do anything wrong
    2.) If we did do anything wrong, it was just a few bad apples
    3.) We’re against wrong, as I’ve said lots of times!

    Think I’ve heard that before.

    Good luck with that, Lloyd!

    Why not? Not long ago worked well for some other guys.

    But Goldman needs to update with the times. After the three three-step program above, they need to follow with…

    1. Must look forward, not backward.
    2. Full plate.
    3. Pick your serial battles, but not this one as you wouldn’t be able to get anything else done.
    4. Plus also too.

  35. 35.

    Violet

    April 19, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    @Cat Lady:
    Oh, wow, that’s a great article. Can someone just put Brooksley Born and Elizabeth Warren in charge of our economy. Everyone will benefit.

  36. 36.

    Professor

    April 19, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    Fellows, what has happened to Phil Gramm and his wife? We used to say ‘where are they now’? Did they have any part to play in this debacle?

  37. 37.

    Mike Kay

    April 19, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    This sounds like Otter’s “Don’t Bad Mouth the USA” Defense from “Animal House”

    youtube.com/watch?v=KLHFdduVDVg&feature=related

  38. 38.

    SomeoneWhoOncePostedUnderaDifferentName

    April 19, 2010 at 3:19 pm

    Don’t fight it. Just buy Goldman stock everytime it drops over the next few months.

    When it goes up (probably after the case is dismissed, settled for pennies, or is overturned by the COA or SC), take your winnings and blow it on a two week binge in the Carribean. It’s the only way you can pull a sliver of joy out of what has happened to this country.

  39. 39.

    ajr22

    April 19, 2010 at 3:20 pm

    @rootless-e: This analogy only works if Goldman was only stealing from other banks and hedge funds that were also crooks. When they are screwing over pension funds and the U.S taxpayer they stray out of Omar territory. He said ” I aint never pull my gun on no taxpayer” that’s part of the game ” You just get up close and hit the right *Bleep*” Goldman hit a few million taxpayers.

  40. 40.

    Cat Lady

    April 19, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    @Violet:

    Include Sheila Bair, Meredith Whitney and Sharron Watkins, give them a budget and subpeona power, and stand back. Shock and awe baby, shock and awe.

  41. 41.

    SomeoneWhoOncePostedUnderaDifferentName

    April 19, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    @kay:

    No way. It’s not like GS just found out about the lawsuit on Friday. They’ve had weeks (if not months) to prepare for this. They’re not changing strategies because they gave it some thought over the weekend.

  42. 42.

    rootless-e

    April 19, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    @ajr22: in this case, Goldman was stealing from ACA/RoyalBankofScotland, ABN/AMRO and IKB.

    i just can’t get worked up about it.

    It’s a weak analogy, I admit. But I can’t find it in my heart to be mad that ABN/AMRO made a naive and costly trade on the advice of GS.

  43. 43.

    Legalize

    April 19, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    I think analyzing what makes the various “conservative” groups different misses the point. The point is, what makes them all the same: They’re lying sacks of shit who care only about themselves and people just like them, and who would gladly push every one of us in front of a moving bus if it mean the remote possibility of saving their Blackberry.

  44. 44.

    kommrade reproductive vigor

    April 19, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    And it’s AIDS, not Aids. Also. Too.

  45. 45.

    kay

    April 19, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    @SomeoneWhoOncePostedUnderaDifferentName:

    I don’t know. I see your point, but I disagree. What does “condone” mean, ordinarily?

    “It happened, but I had nothing to do with it”. It doesn’t even mean he wasn’t aware of it. It just means he’s not a big fan.

    Look, I don’t know what’s going to happen, but it occurs to me that this notion that GS are “untouchable” comes from the same place that says GS are “brilliant”.

    I just don’t know about either of those assumptions.

    Everyone said all the same shit about ENRON, as I recall.

    We’ll see.

  46. 46.

    Upper West

    April 19, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    Sorry, Lloyd — GS is out of luck:

    Respondeat Superior

    (n) Doctrine of Respondent superior implies the responsibility of the superiors on the actions done by their employees, agents, subordinates etc when they are doing such actions during their assigned duties. So when an accident happens while handling an explosive involved in the work assigned to such person, The master is responsible for such loss. The Latin word (rehs-pond-dee-at superior) means ‘let the master answer’

  47. 47.

    kay

    April 19, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    @SomeoneWhoOncePostedUnderaDifferentName:

    It’s not like GS just found out about the lawsuit on Friday. They’ve had weeks (if not months) to prepare for this. They’re not changing strategies because they gave it some thought over the weekend.

    Too, they now have to pretend they didn’t know, because they didn’t warn investors. So they release a statement Friday that is a bald denial, and then they release a statement Monday that seems to indicate new information. “We didn’t know Friday: just look at our statement”.
    He begins with announcing he’s writing Sunday. That’s sort of interesting.

  48. 48.

    gex

    April 19, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    @ajr22: Agreed. The Omar Littles in this story were the guys who shorted the big 5. And they even differ from Omar in that many of them tried to get the SEC to take action.

    I guess the immorality of these sociopaths does not rankle some.

  49. 49.

    gex

    April 19, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    @rootless-e: A lot of those banks got their money from innocent people too. And a lot of them got bailouts from their country, the EU, the US or some combination of the three. That’s not even counting the untold billions flowing to them all because of the AIG bailout.

    What, do you think they just pony up their own money and swap it around? They basically are defrauding everyone who participates in the global economy. And you say “meh.” Interesting.

  50. 50.

    rootless-e

    April 19, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    @gex:

    I just don’t want to excuse the bankers. Look at IBK. Their charter was to make loans for industrial development in Germany. So dipshit Basel 2 regulators declared that roulette bets that the ratings agencies declared to be AAA could be treated as regulatory capital. And the high paid management at IBK took a pile of money and instead of lending it to people who want to make refrigerators or windmills, they signed onto a scam that would have embarrassed the folks who call old people and try to trick them into revealing their credit card numbers. And then, people who sweep streets and empty bedbans in Germany had their taxes used to bail out these morons.

  51. 51.

    Alex S.

    April 19, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    The SEC vote on the Goldman Sachs fraud charge was split along partisan lines. The Republicans voted against it:

    huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/19/goldman-sachs-vs-sec-all_n_542736.html

    Of course, this won’t stop them from accusing the Obama administration of being in the pockets of Goldman Sachs, and it won’t stop them from acting like populists.

  52. 52.

    rootless-e

    April 19, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    @gex: Omar was not helping build a richer and more community oriented Baltimore either. The entire industry is based on fraud. I am suspicious of what I see as an effort to claim it’s just a few bad apples.

  53. 53.

    flukebucket

    April 19, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    @Professor:

    Good ‘ol Phil was referenced just this morning in a Harpers Magazine blurb I read.

    He is probably somewhere enjoying a fundamentally sound economy.

  54. 54.

    jl

    April 19, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Forget this Goldman Sachs trivia.

    This here is really important.

    Breitbart’s operation says Miley Cyrus is a liberal mole.

    Is Miley Cyrus an Alinskyite Mole Sent to Brainwash Country Music Fans
    yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/04/is-miley-cyrus-an-alinskyite-mole-sent-to-brainwash-coun…

    And what about Taylor Swift? Was in movie with Miley Cyrus, guest hosted SNL, and now in a movie with known liberal starlet eggheads Julia Roberts and Jessica Alba.

    The true real Americans are under seige and infiltrated by sinister fifth columns of talented hotties. Bwa-ha-ha-ha!

    The evil plot continues.

  55. 55.

    rootless-e

    April 19, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    @gex:

    I just don’t want to excuse the bankers. Look at IBK. Their charter was to make loans for industrial development in Germany. So Basel 2 regulators declared that roulette bets that the ratings agencies declared to be AAA could be treated as regulatory capital. And the high paid management at IBK took a pile of money and instead of lending it to people who want to make refrigerators or windmills, they signed onto a scam that would have embarrassed the folks who call old people and try to trick them into revealing their credit card numbers. And then, people who sweep streets and empty bedbans in Germany had their taxes used to bail IBK out.

  56. 56.

    Linda Featheringill

    April 19, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    That guy – Blankfein – he just can’t shut up, can he?

    If he really has to make a public announcement every 48 hours or so, and continues to do so, he might wind up talking himself into jail.

    This whole drama might be more action-packed than I anticipated.

  57. 57.

    rootless-e

    April 19, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    my comment is awaiting moderation.

  58. 58.

    jl

    April 19, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    @rootless-e: check for boner pill names embedded in the words.

    S o s h u l i s t, for example.

    Or maybe it pissed off Tunch, in which case there is no hope.

  59. 59.

    rootless-e

    April 19, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    I just don’t want to excuse the bankers. Look at IBK. Their charter was to make loans for industrial development in Germany. So Basel 2 regulators declared that any tricks that the ratings agencies declared to be AAA could be treated as regulatory capital. And the high paid management at IBK took a pile of money and instead of lending it to people who want to make refrigerators or windmills, they signed onto a scam that would have embarrassed the folks who call old people and try to steal their savings. And then, people who sweep streets and empty bedbans in Germany had their taxes used to bail IBK out.

    took out the reference to a kind of ga mb oling

  60. 60.

    Jon H

    April 19, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    John,

    May I humbly request that any mention of Blankfein in a post be accompanied by a picture of Verne Troyer (Mini-Me). The resemblance is remarkable.

    I would particularly suggest a picture of Troyer, drunk and naked, from Surreal Life.

  61. 61.

    Mike Kay

    April 19, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    @jl:

    Breitbart is seriously sick.

    I was flipping channels the night before the inauguration, and o’reilly had breitbart on and he was calling Tom Hanks a commie for appearing at Inauguration concert held the day before.

  62. 62.

    kay

    April 19, 2010 at 4:35 pm

    The big banks and investment houses should have asked a the peons what people were doing with debt, before they decided no one would ever default on a mortgage.

    They weren’t making the mortgage first, because they needed to make the car payment to get to work, and the foreclosure process is lengthy, and the repo process is not.

    Just common sense, if you’re drowning.

  63. 63.

    ksmiami

    April 19, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    Hoocoodanode??? Obligatory reference to Calculated Risk… Basically, Goldman adds little or no value to society – it literally makes money by allocating risk pools and then heaping fees on top. No actual product, or wealth, or societal good ever gets produced.

  64. 64.

    kay

    April 19, 2010 at 4:41 pm

    @ksmiami:

    Well, I think it’s safe to say they buy a lot of things, so there’s that.
    One of the gentleman menioned in the complaint purchased a home for 41 million dollars in 2008, for example.

  65. 65.

    Bnut

    April 19, 2010 at 5:01 pm

    @jl:

    We have sent our most vapid and commercial of products (the jail bait singer) undercover to make conservatives that much stupider. I give it a year before they all die of brain softening from listening to her “country”.

  66. 66.

    J. Michael Neal

    April 19, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    Count me in with rootless. As I’ve expressed here several times over the last few days, the idea that the parties on the other sides of these trades were innocent dupes is laughable. That includes the ones at the pension funds. The people who had money in those funds, they are legitimate victims. I have ZERO sympathy for the people who ran them into the ground, and the anger of pension holders should be directed first at the clowns who ran them.

    All that said, my lack of sympathy for the counterparties should not be read as thinking that the case is inappropriate. I’m all for gunning down Goldman execs in the streets and making the rest of the employees clean up the mess with toothbrushes. However, that’s on general principles, and the fraud case is merely a tool to accomplish a good end.

  67. 67.

    rootless-e

    April 19, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    @J. Michael Neal: Felix Salmon is trying to make the case that investments in synthetic CDOs was not speculation because historical data showed that a diversified portfolio of rmbs would be safe.

    Jesus.

    Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.

  68. 68.

    Mnemosyne

    April 19, 2010 at 5:13 pm

    @kay:

    The big banks and investment houses should have asked a the peons what people were doing with debt, before they decided no one would ever default on a mortgage.
    __
    They weren’t making the mortgage first, because they needed to make the car payment to get to work, and the foreclosure process is lengthy, and the repo process is not.

    It’s even better than that. Remember that credit card bankruptcy bill that the banksters pushed through that made it much more difficult for people to default on their credit cards? Once it became easier to default on a mortgage than on your credit card, people kept up their credit card payments and stopped paying the mortgage.

    So now, instead of losing $30,000 in credit card debt, banks are losing $300,000 (and more) from those very same people when they put their keys in the mail and walk away from their house. That’s what you get for only looking at the next quarter’s profits and not the long-term effects of a policy that you basically wrote yourself.

  69. 69.

    J. Michael Neal

    April 19, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    Also, I’m not sure people here really appreciate Goldman’s place on the Street. People don’t deal with them because they want to. They deal with them because all roads lead to Rome Goldman Sachs. No one in their right mind actually trusts them, though that leaves plenty of people who might. For certain kinds of deals, though, you really don’t have any choice but to go with them.

    I do disagree with R. Porrofatto’s assertion that the people there don’t really work. Actually, they work like dogs. Insane hours. Ridiculous schedules. Vacations canceled on a moment’s notice. Ignoring an illness until it becomes impossible to work and then needing major surgery is frighteningly common.

    Really, the amount that they work is a large part of the problem. It completely shapes their worldview. For most of them, the money is the *only* reward for their job. Most of them don’t like it, and they realize that their in a never ending rat race. They don’t have a life outside the job. Because they’re so harassed for time, they become completely dependent upon the perks money can buy to make things a little easier.

    Perhaps the single most effective regulation we could put on the financial industry is to mandate 40 hour weeks, and no more.

  70. 70.

    Mnemosyne

    April 19, 2010 at 5:15 pm

    @J. Michael Neal:

    As I’ve expressed here several times over the last few days, the idea that the parties on the other sides of these trades were innocent dupes is laughable.

    Big city police departments call some homicide cases “NHI” — No Humans Involved. It’s generally drug dealers killing one another.

    This is the financial version of that.

  71. 71.

    SomeoneWhoOncePostedUnderaDifferentName

    April 19, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    @kay:

    I’m not a fan of GS by any means.

    But GS is the Death Star and while there may be a lot of Luke Skywalkers out there, they bought up and destroyed all the X-Wings. All we can do it stand around and kick dust at the two moons orbiting our crappy planet.

  72. 72.

    debbie

    April 19, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    Blankfein has clearly been coached by the Catholic Church.

  73. 73.

    jl

    April 19, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    Given the backpedal linked to above, I propose

    Days of whine and poses

    for the winemaker’s little tantrum.

  74. 74.

    Jinx

    April 19, 2010 at 8:29 pm

    @Mike Kay:

    What! I thought that Garth Brooks inaugueration concert performance definitively proved that Nashville had been assimilated by ACORN. Hell, he tipped his hat to the President! Game over in the battle for the soul of country music.

    Miley Cyrus? She may be a foot soldier in Obama’s war to subvert all that America holds dear, but the battle of Music City ended long ago.

    I feel so bad for Andrew, his regiment must be cut off, forced to rely on old intel.

  75. 75.

    Salt and freshly ground black people

    April 19, 2010 at 9:24 pm

    @flukebucket: LOL. Too bad the rest of us are in a mental recession and can’t join him.

  76. 76.

    Porlock Junior

    April 20, 2010 at 2:12 am

    @Cat Lady:
    I’ll vote for that. In fact, I was going to respond to Violet in re: Bair. It was particularly striking at the height of The Crisis, when there was this triumvirate in charge of everything, except one of them wasn’t a vir. The two viri were the secty of Treasury and the Fed chairman; the unvir, Bair, was the one who was concerned with the effect of it all on actual people. Can she ever find a respectable job again?

  77. 77.

    bob h

    April 20, 2010 at 8:07 am

    More shoes are going to drop pretty soon. Germany and U.K. are considering action against Goldman; the E.U. may take action based on Greek securities, and bank-on-bank lawsuits will probably break out. Big clients with fiduciary responsibilities may flee. Good luck, Lloyd.

    Will Goldman become the first test of the new bailout regime?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Sunday Morning Garden Chat: Flower Portraits 14
Image by Mike in Oly (11/16/25)

Recent Comments

  • cain on They Have Waited Long Enough Far Too Long (Nov 17, 2025 @ 1:47am)
  • cain on Late Night Respite Open Thread (Nov 17, 2025 @ 1:45am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 1,361: The Small Hours Are Once Again the Deadliest Hours (Nov 17, 2025 @ 1:40am)
  • moonbat on Late Night Respite Open Thread (Nov 17, 2025 @ 1:35am)
  • pattonbt on Medium Cool – Great Silly Movies (Nov 17, 2025 @ 1:32am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!