• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

How any woman could possibly vote for this smug smarmy piece of misogynistic crap is beyond understanding.

I really should read my own blog.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Text STOP to opt out of updates on war plans.

“Loving your country does not mean lying about its history.”

We still have time to mess this up!

Fight them, without becoming them!

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

One lie, alone, tears the fabric of reality.

This fight is for everything.

How stupid are these people?

Humiliatingly small and eclipsed by the derision of millions.

Republicans choose power over democracy, every day.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

The press swings at every pitch, we don’t have to.

I’m more christian than these people and i’m an atheist.

… gradually, and then suddenly.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

You cannot love your country only when you win.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

Republicans: slavery is when you own me. freedom is when I own you.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Activist Judges! / The Flip Side of a Blank Slate

The Flip Side of a Blank Slate

by @heymistermix.com|  May 16, 201012:35 pm| 35 Comments

This post is in: Activist Judges!, Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

Goodwin Liu, who is 39, was nominated to be an appellate judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals earlier this year and submitted this:

[…] links to YouTube videos of lectures and talks he gave, along with 573 pages of public writings, new articles about him, syllabi from courses he taught, statements about legal issues, etc. Liu searched 36 websites, including the ACLU of Northern California and Yale Law School, for any mentions of himself.

Even so, he’s had to amend his disclosure four times to add more, and send groveling letters to the Judiciary Committee:

In the latest correspondence, he writes that he missed some public appearances that he should have known about initially and that he did not think to include appearances at such occasions as brown bag lunches and alumni gatherings.

And he gets this from Jeff Sessions:

[T]he Ranking Member of the committee, said that based on the “glaring omissions” Liu may have “knowingly attempted to hide his most controversial work.” The letter was signed by all seven Republicans on the committee.

“Professor Liu’s unwillingness to take seriously his obligation to complete these basic forms is potentially disqualifying and has placed his nomination in jeopardy,” Sessions wrote.

I’d like to know more about Elena Kagan, but judging from Liu’s experience, the one thing I know with certainty is that she was smart to keep her mouth shut.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The Atlantic’s finest
Next Post: Who’s just dyin’ to Meacham »

Reader Interactions

35Comments

  1. 1.

    me

    May 16, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    Jeff Sessions is a fucking asshole. Oops, now I’m disqualified from being a federal judge.

  2. 2.

    eric

    May 16, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    baseball may be America’s past time, but Calvinball is the GOP’s past time.

    No worry about hobgobblins in the GOP.

    eric

  3. 3.

    mr. whipple

    May 16, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    I’d like to know more about Elena Kagan, but judging from Liu’s experience, the one thing I know with certainty is that she was smart to keep her mouth shut.

    Yup. This whole thing has become such a farce.

  4. 4.

    Violet

    May 16, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    Brown bag lunches and alumni gatherings? Really? The silliness knows no bounds. What if there had been no video or transcript? Gasp! The horror! It would almost be as if it hadn’t existed.

    Request: Can the Senators who signed this letter please take a film crew with them to document every move they make. I want to be sure we don’t miss something important.

  5. 5.

    Davis X. Machina

    May 16, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    The letter was signed by all seven Republicans on the committee.

    No surprise.

    Expecting otherwise is like expecting six of the — let me check my schedule — Detroit Tigers joining the Boston Red Sox to make sure the good people at Comerica Park get their money’s worth this afternoon.

    I fully expect the next Republican-led Congress to remove E pluribus unum from our coinage — elitist (hey, it’s in Latin), collectivist, and just plain old — with the immortal words of perhaps our most-unfairly neglected Founding Father, the Oakland Raiders’ Al Davis — “Just Win, Baby”.

  6. 6.

    Michael Scott

    May 16, 2010 at 12:44 pm

    Yes, he’s clearly “hiding” some of his public appearances from the helpless deaf, dumb and blind autistics on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Those overlooked brown bag lunches are precisely where Liu’s Trotskyite revolutionary theories are exposed!

    Is it a requirement now that the GOP Senators be as lazy, paranoid and stupid as the Tea Baggers who vote for them?

  7. 7.

    Davis X. Machina

    May 16, 2010 at 12:48 pm

    Is it a requirement now that the GOP Senators be as lazy, paranoid and stupid as the Tea Baggers who vote for them?

    The usual theories of representative government more or less demand it. Although to comport perfectly with theory, the ideal GOP representative should be lazy, paranoid, stupid, and corrupt. Someone must speak for business, too.

  8. 8.

    kommrade reproductive vigor

    May 16, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    Shorter Sessions: “He’s foreign and he’s been nominated by President ScaryHusseinMarxistObama. Off with his head!

    The top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, likewise found Miers’ qualifications suitable five years ago: “It is not necessary that she have previous experience as a judge in order to serve on the Supreme Court,” Sessions said. “It’s perfectly acceptable to nominate outstanding lawyers to that position.”

  9. 9.

    mcd410x

    May 16, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    That’s a mighty nice strawman you’ve got there.

  10. 10.

    Citizen_X

    May 16, 2010 at 12:59 pm

    Meanwhile, weren’t you dying to know what Newt Gingrinch has to say about Kagan? Apparently, he wants Obama to withdraw her nomination, for a bizarre set of reasons.

  11. 11.

    DougJ

    May 16, 2010 at 1:00 pm

    There are too many Asians in the courts already. Why not some real Murkins, people you’d meet at the Applebee’s salad bar, somewhere *outside* the Acela corridor?

  12. 12.

    SiubhanDuinne

    May 16, 2010 at 1:01 pm

    It seems recently that every time I turn on an NPR news program, there’s ol’ Jefferson Beauregard Sessions the Whateverth sounding forth drawling on about Kagan. Why do the MorningEditionWeekendEditionAllThingsConsidered producers feel obliged to offer him a microphone every day?

  13. 13.

    Citizen Alan

    May 16, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    My god I despise Jeff Sessions. What a loathsome, beady-eyed piece of human shit. It’s like Mike Judge somehow summoned Cotton Hill from King of the Hill to life and then made him a Senator, except Cotton Hill had his legs blown off in Korea, while Sessions made it through Vietnam in the Army Reserves without ever being called up to active duty.

  14. 14.

    Davis X. Machina

    May 16, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    @Citizen_X: The unfortunate thing is I have heard every one of Newt’s reasons given on DemocraticUnderground.com too.

  15. 15.

    Hypnos

    May 16, 2010 at 1:34 pm

    Gingrich: “[…] concerns that during her time as Dean, Harvard Law accepted money from Saudi Arabia.”

    For Christ’s sake the second largest shareholder of Fox News after Rupert Murdoch is a Saudi prince! What the fuck!

  16. 16.

    Wilson Heath

    May 16, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    Yes, because the most radical work of any faculty member is reserved for a alumni gatherings.

    There is no lie too stupid for Jeff Sessions to push. Good thing his own nomination was appropriately torpedoed before such a hack political operative got a lifetime appointment.

  17. 17.

    gbear

    May 16, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    Why do the MorningEditionWeekendEditionAllThingsConsidered producers feel obliged to offer him a microphone every day?

    Because the MorningEditionWeekendEditionAllThingsConsidered producers suck cocktail weiners.

  18. 18.

    Alex S.

    May 16, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    He still hasn’t submitted anything related to his sexual orientation!

  19. 19.

    gbear

    May 16, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    @Alex S.:

    Are you referring to Goodwin Liu or to Jeff Sessions?

  20. 20.

    Ash Can

    May 16, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    Can the Senators who signed this letter please take a film crew with them to document every move they make.

    The film would be immediately impounded by the FBI’s RICO division, with surreptitious copies bootlegged to gay porn sites.

  21. 21.

    Nick

    May 16, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    I remember during the Sotomayor nomination some firebagger saying the best thing for the President to do is nominate an uber liberal who looks like a moderate.

  22. 22.

    Oscar Leroy

    May 16, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    Kagan was smart to keep her mouth shut

    Not to mention the blinding integrity she has shown by doing a 180 on her belief that court nominees should explain where they stand.

  23. 23.

    sherifffruitfly

    May 16, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    And the self-proclaimed “true progressives” whining about “blank slate” do so for precisely the same reason as republicans – they just don’t want her. And just like republicans, it’s simply because Obama nominated her.

  24. 24.

    rikyrah

    May 16, 2010 at 6:01 pm

    Kagan was smart to keep her mouth shut?

    I don’t think so.

    Liu just has to hang in there through this bullshyt, until confirmation.

    Sorry, but I believe in paper trails.

    I believe that we should know how people stand. it’s up to the Democrats to defend our nominees.

    He’s only 39…yes……all we gotta do is get him into the pipeline.

  25. 25.

    kay

    May 16, 2010 at 6:23 pm

    @Oscar Leroy:

    Not to mention the blinding integrity she has shown by doing a 180 on her belief that court nominees should explain where they stand.

    Nah. The “blank slate” idea or the assumption that she’s stonewalling is premature, and therefore unfair. They’re releasing a lot of information. It’s her whole work record in the Clinton WH. It will be (I think) what they’re calling (broadly) “strategy memos”, so not judicial opinions, but being a federal judge was never a requirement for SCOTUS, and it’s not important, to me, anyway. I have no problem with no judicial record. I don’t think that should be a requirement.
    We’ll be able to get a real feel for the way she thinks and operates, and that could provide an opportunity for legit and good question (not from these idiots, but it could be done). She’ll probably have to explain some of this work. In my view, the “blank slate” charge looks to be just untrue, unless you’re reading “full slate” very narrowly, to include only judicial opinions, and I don’t.

    The White House has asked the National Archives to expedited its planned release of 160,000 pages of documents related to Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s time in the Clinton White House — including her electronic mail. Bob Bauer, counsel to President Obama, made the request in a letter sent Saturday, saying speedy release of the documents is necessary to help the Senate Judiciary Committee consider Mr. Obama’s nomination of Ms. Kagan to the Supreme Court.

  26. 26.

    kay

    May 16, 2010 at 6:36 pm

    and also for records relating to her nomination in 1999 to the federal court of appeals in the District of Columbia. (Republicans never gave her a hearing, and so she did not get the job.)

    That could be really useful too, depending on how much she revealed in that first process.
    It was a long time ago, in political years. I’d be interested in how her views might have changed.
    Not that she’ll get any rational questions along those compare-contrast lines. It’ll be all military recruiters on campus, all the time, but that might be a worthwhile, substantive inquiry, if anyone (like a Senator) wanted to try it.

  27. 27.

    some other guy

    May 16, 2010 at 7:54 pm

    Wait, isn’t Goodwin Liu the Shaolin Master Killer?

  28. 28.

    West of the Cascades

    May 16, 2010 at 8:26 pm

    So … Liu has to fill out the forms and do his own searches on YouTube because, what, the Republicans aren’t competent to use Teh Google? Isn’t Sessions’s letter just an admission that “Fail “R” Us”?

  29. 29.

    Nick

    May 16, 2010 at 8:56 pm

    @rikyrah: Liu doesn’t have anymore of a paper trail than Kagan does, the only difference is he said one or two things that make the bullhorns of the echo chambers smile.

  30. 30.

    burnspbesq

    May 16, 2010 at 9:00 pm

    @Citizen_X:

    Meanwhile, weren’t you dying to know what Newt Gingrinch has to say about Kagan?

    Actually, no.

  31. 31.

    Pug

    May 16, 2010 at 9:56 pm

    Who can ever forget Jeff Sessions (of fucking Alabama no less) during the Sotomayor hearings?

    In his best George Wallace accent, “Ah bulieve this heah Potah Riccan woman is racist”.

  32. 32.

    Bobby Thomson

    May 16, 2010 at 10:37 pm

    It’s a shame Liu can’t give this the response it deserves:

    “Oh, so let me get this straight. Last Thursday there was a committee vote and every single Republican on the committee voted against me. Now, you, Jeff Sessions, one of the people who voted against me for spurious reasons, is threatening not to support my nomination. The nomination you already voted against. The nomination that never depended on your vote, but instead the votes of all 57 Democrats, the two Independents, and Olympia Snowe. Because I might have talked to show and tell at the local grade school and forgotten to report it. Gotcha.”

  33. 33.

    Bobby Thomson

    May 16, 2010 at 10:47 pm

    Ah, jeez. Didn’t realize this was from over a month ago.

    Still stupid, just not as stupid.

  34. 34.

    Rhoda

    May 17, 2010 at 12:50 am

    @rikyrah: Kagan couldn’t get into the pipeline when Clinton nominated her and Liu is still a 50/50 proposition. The fact is, the court generally pushes rational people to the left. Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito are far right reactionaries and Kennedy is a moderate reactionary (if that makes sense). So, no, I think the way this thing is right now you need someone who won’t make waves but is clearly liberal.

    Kagan is a liberal. She’ll move to the left on the court; she can talk with Kennedy and stands a chance of pushing him to the left on some issues. She won’t change the make up of the court.

    The time for a supreme court fight is when the 5-4 dynamic can be broken. IMO, until then, it just hands bullets to the right.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Reverse Elena Kagan: Too Much Information says:
    May 17, 2010 at 9:21 am

    […] was apparently undaunted but, as Mistermix points out, even though he exhaustively documented his virtual appearances he’s already had […]

Primary Sidebar

Furry Friends: OzarkHillbilly and His Beloved 4-Footed Friends (Repost)
Missing OzarkHillbilly (12/5/25)

2026 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

PLEASE REVIEW YOUR INFO ASAP

Recent Comments

  • Elizabelle on Saturday Morning Open Thread (Dec 6, 2025 @ 7:50am)
  • David_C on Saturday Morning Open Thread (Dec 6, 2025 @ 7:50am)
  • prostratedragon on Late Night Open Thread: (Gangsters’) Game Knows Game (Dec 6, 2025 @ 7:47am)
  • Gin & Tonic on Saturday Morning Open Thread (Dec 6, 2025 @ 7:47am)
  • different-church-lady on Late Night Open Thread: (Gangsters’) Game Knows Game (Dec 6, 2025 @ 7:47am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!