• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

It is possible to do the right thing without the promise of a cookie.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

the 10% who apparently lack object permanence

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” was supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

Consistently wrong since 2002

We know you aren’t a Democrat but since you seem confused let me help you.

Speaker Mike Johnson is a vile traitor to the House and the Constitution.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. do not touch it.”

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

You passed on an opportunity to be offended? What are you even doing here?

If a good thing happens for a bad reason, it’s still a good thing.

In my day, never was longer.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

One lie, alone, tears the fabric of reality.

The rest of the comments were smacking Boebert like she was a piñata.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

It’s pointless to bring up problems that can only be solved with a time machine.

If you are still in the gop, you are either an extremist yourself, or in bed with those who are.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / All About Australia

All About Australia

by John Cole|  June 24, 20108:06 am| 38 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs

FacebookTweetEmail

I’m being chastised by commenter TattooSydney for not having a thread about the elections in Australia. In my defense, I didn’t know they held elections in penal colonies.

At any rate, apparently the PM is quite a character.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Coincidence?
Next Post: Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

38Comments

  1. 1.

    Annamal

    June 24, 2010 at 8:20 am

    Errr not really elections…

  2. 2.

    flukebucket

    June 24, 2010 at 8:21 am

    I didn’t know they held elections in penal colonies.

    I just love starting a day off with a huge guffaw.

    Thanks. I can tell it is going to be a great day.

  3. 3.

    Michael D.

    June 24, 2010 at 8:28 am

    Not only do they hold elections in Australia, but voting is compulsory. If you don’t vote, you can be fined.

    And all Australians are characters. We’ve hosted several at our home and they are unfailingly friendly and always smiling.

  4. 4.

    JayR

    June 24, 2010 at 8:33 am

    What election? It was a coup. Fairly bloodless, though. The streets of Canberra are pretty quiet as we speak…

  5. 5.

    NobodySpecial

    June 24, 2010 at 8:33 am

    Can we trade Palin and a future GOP draft pick for the new PM?

  6. 6.

    JayR

    June 24, 2010 at 8:44 am

    Also, the United States was also a penal colony.

  7. 7.

    mclaren

    June 24, 2010 at 8:51 am

    Of course they hold elections in penal colonies. How do you think Schwarzeneggar became governor?

  8. 8.

    Matt

    June 24, 2010 at 8:57 am

    Can someone explain the politics of this person? Is this a good thing?

  9. 9.

    geg6

    June 24, 2010 at 9:04 am

    @Matt:

    I know nothing of the politics of Australia, but what I read yesterday was that the coup was from the more progressive part of the Labour Party there.

    But isn’t there an actual election coming up pretty quickly and isn’t Labour in deep shit in the polls?

  10. 10.

    Tattoosydney

    June 24, 2010 at 9:09 am

    She’s a foreign-born, lefty, female, unmarried, child-free woman with ginger hair who’s dating a hairdresser.

    She made her way up through the hierarchy of our Labor Party, which means she’s as tough as boots, and she’s from the left wing of the party, which means she’s an expert with placing a stiletto quietly in a back. I have great hopes for her.

    You can read an interview with her, conducted just after she became PM, here.

    For the relationship between Australia and the US, it means business as usual, but then, it’s always business as usual.

  11. 11.

    Andrew

    June 24, 2010 at 9:09 am

    Reader’s Digest summary of new Australian PM Julia Gillard:

    Very focused & competent politician with a sense of humour but also a ruthless streak. On policy substance she’s not actually all that different from the chap she’s just knifed (she replaced Rudd in the same way Gordon Brown replaced Blair, by party room vote rather than a popular election); basically the party made the switch because Rudd had done so many policy backflips that no-one was listening to him any more either inside or outside the party, so they’ve hit the reset button. There’s a summary up at 538 which has some inaccuracies but still is probably a fairly decent brief history for an outsider to read.

    On the plus side, the opposition leader is a misogynist straight from about 1950 with a long record of being completely at sea when trying to debate women, so things could get entertaining as she takes him on.

    And the reason you didn’t know this was on is that no-one did. From conception of the coup to execution took less than 24 hours. The whole country has a bit of a wtf look on its face.

  12. 12.

    Tattoosydney

    June 24, 2010 at 9:13 am

    @geg6:

    But isn’t there an actual election coming up pretty quickly and isn’t Labour in deep shit in the polls?

    Depends on how you read the polls. Labor’s primary vote is down allegedly to 35%, but most of the defecting Labor voters seem to have defected to the left and to the greens, not to the right.

    I suspect there is a larger and more enduring supply of goodwill for Julia, who is a good bog lower class lefty (which has worked before), than their was for Kevin, who was a bureaucrat with the soul of a dentist.

    Our election will be sometime this year. We have this odd system where our elections last for a few weeks, rather than taking over the entire country for eighteen months.

  13. 13.

    Jack Bauer

    June 24, 2010 at 9:18 am

    Good article, with her address as leader.

    Slightly more progressive than Rudd, seems serious about the environment but we’ll see about that. My initial impressions are positive.

  14. 14.

    Tattoosydney

    June 24, 2010 at 9:19 am

    Thanks to Mr Cole for the thread, btw.

    At least some Americans might know a little about politics in Austria now.

  15. 15.

    JayR

    June 24, 2010 at 9:26 am

    At least some Americans might know a little about politics in Austria now.

    Nope. I’m still pretty clueless about what’s going on in Vienna.

    (Sorry, couldn’t resist…)

  16. 16.

    Jeffro

    June 24, 2010 at 9:27 am

    @Tattoosydney:

    We have this odd system where our elections last for a few weeks, rather than taking over the entire country for eighteen months.

    Hey…what’re you trying to say there?

  17. 17.

    AxelFoley

    June 24, 2010 at 9:31 am

    In my defense, I didn’t know they held elections in penal colonies.

    Pwn’d.

  18. 18.

    AxelFoley

    June 24, 2010 at 9:33 am

    @NobodySpecial:

    Can we trade Palin and a future GOP draft pick for the new PM?

    We’ll give ’em Condoleeza Rice, too, but we keep Tiger Woods and Eminem.

  19. 19.

    Redshirt

    June 24, 2010 at 9:39 am

    I’m disturbed by all this.

    1. Why? Just a short while ago, Rudd was the toast of the country! I was there for the 08 Election, and he was great. What happened?

    2. The leader of a nation can be deposed by the internal machinations of a political party. I know that’s how Parlimentary systems work, but… wow. Seems ripe for abuse.

    3. I could not find anything about this in the US news. What the hell? I’d consider Australia a major country, major ally, and this seems to be big news. What the hell?!

  20. 20.

    MattF

    June 24, 2010 at 9:41 am

    Sorta interesting in a broader sense– every now and then someone raises the question of parliamentary-vs.-presidential political systems. But there isn’t much discussion of this ‘assassins-at-play’ aspect of parliamentary systems– that a government can just change overnight, and that’s just the way it is. Does this happen much in Austeralia?

  21. 21.

    JayR

    June 24, 2010 at 9:45 am

    @Redshirt:

    3. I could not find anything about this in the US news. What the hell? I’d consider Australia a major country, major ally, and this seems to be big news. What the hell?!

    It’s still by and large a mystery here in Australia, as Andrew pointed out in 11. It was about 10 pm in the US when it was a done deal so I’d wait another news cycle for it to be picked up.

  22. 22.

    toujoursdan

    June 24, 2010 at 9:47 am

    She may be more left wing, but she dumped the proposed tax on mining (which I think made complete sense) quickly enough. Reuters: Australia unveils tax on mining projects

    @Redshirt:

    It’s not really all that disturbing. In Westminster parliamentary systems you vote for a party, not the leader of it. I think it’s genius because it puts more focus on the manifesto of the party rather than the charisma of a person. Lots of people voted for G.W. Bush because they wanted to have dinner with him, which I thought is a huge flaw in the U.S. system.

    Even with the Ottawa earthquake, there was a top story about it on the CBC News in Canada last night. Many of us wish the same thing would happen to Stephen Harper.

  23. 23.

    geg6

    June 24, 2010 at 9:51 am

    @JayR:

    Yeah, I only heard about it because Sully posted about it.

  24. 24.

    someguy

    June 24, 2010 at 10:04 am

    @toujoursdan:

    I think it’s genius because it puts more focus on the manifesto of the party rather than the charisma of a person.

    Plus it’d be pretty cool to wake up to a new President every so often. Things aren’t working out, and BAM! New President. The possibilities for radical change would be better, for sure.

  25. 25.

    NonyNony

    June 24, 2010 at 10:20 am

    In my defense, I didn’t know they held elections in penal colonies.

    The state of Georgia has elections quite frequently, you know.

  26. 26.

    Redshirt

    June 24, 2010 at 10:33 am

    @someguy: I’d say just the opposite: That would be a terror. Can you imagine what the Joe Lieberman’s of America would do if they could toss out the President on an internal party vote?

    Hello President Huckleberry!

  27. 27.

    Maude

    June 24, 2010 at 10:42 am

    @Redshirt: \
    Ah, President Palin

  28. 28.

    toujoursdan

    June 24, 2010 at 11:37 am

    The American system is very individualistic but the Westminister system tends to be more collectivist.

    I’m more familiar with the Canadian system where you run as a party candidate and then are expected to vote the party line (except during designated “conscience votes”). If you don’t vote the party line you can be tossed out and then the party may run someone against you. The Prime Minister is merely the head of the party in power and can be replaced any time (s) he loses confidence of the party. (S)he will still remain in parliament unless they chose to resign, triggering a by-election. Of course the only people who vote for Prime Minister are people in the Prime Ministers Riding (district). Otherwise you vote solely for your Riding’s candidate.

    In the States it appears to more of a popularity contest. Everyone votes for President and everyone votes for your congressperson and senator. Once elected, there is no expectation that they vote the party line and no discipline by the party if they chose not to. Every vote in Congress is a “conscience vote”.

    They are just different. I like the collectivist orientation of the Parliamentary system more than the U.S. because to a great degree the focus is more on the manifesto of the party, it encourages stronger party identity and you know what you’re getting. But there are advantages of the U.S. system too.

  29. 29.

    El Cid

    June 24, 2010 at 11:59 am

    Look, the competition that matters right now in Australia is the pressure test between Jonathan and Jo, after the stellar performance by Marian and Callum. Jo now has to face “the Terminator”. (No spoilers, please.)

  30. 30.

    LD50

    June 24, 2010 at 12:03 pm

    @JayR:

    3. I could not find anything about this in the US news. What the hell? I’d consider Australia a major country, major ally, and this seems to be big news. What the hell?!

    Generally our liberal media doesn’t pay much attention to events in foreign countries, unless it’s some country we want to bomb (or Israel).

  31. 31.

    PeakVT

    June 24, 2010 at 12:07 pm

    We have this odd system where our elections last for a few weeks, rather than taking over the entire country for eighteen months.

    Sounds like heaven.

  32. 32.

    licensed to kill time

    June 24, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    When we saw this news yesterday on the teevee, my spousal unit said “Oh look, they’ve made Jodie Foster Prime Minister of Australia!”

    ;-)

  33. 33.

    ErinSiobhan

    June 24, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    While these things can happen in parliamentary systems, they aren’t common. And they generally indicate a high level of dysfunction within the party when they do. The results are generally not good for the party when the knives come out.

    The Liberal party in Canada is still recovering from the Martin-Chretien civil war and the Labour party in Britain is having their own problems after Gordon Brown’s ousting of Blair.

    I’m kind of bummed that Rudd mismanaged things so badly that it came to this. And hoping Gillard can hold it all together for the election.

  34. 34.

    JayR

    June 24, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    @ErinSiobhan:

    While these things can happen in parliamentary systems, they aren’t common. And they generally indicate a high level of dysfunction within the party when they do.

    Actually, I’m more than half convinced that the instigator for this was the unfortunate performance by the Socceroos, triggering a deep-seated need for national catharsis.

  35. 35.

    Johnny Pez

    June 24, 2010 at 5:58 pm

    @toujoursdan:

    Many of us wish the same thing would happen to Stephen Harper.

    Yeah, you say that now, but when you wake up to find that Doris is your new PM, you’ll sing a different tune.

  36. 36.

    RJ

    June 24, 2010 at 8:41 pm

    @geg6:
    Yes there are elections coming up, and no Labor is not in deep shit. The national poll on Tuesday had them 52-48 ahead.

    Personally, I think Labor made a mistake in dumping boring but dependable in favour of new(ish) and flashy. Being the safe candidate wins elections, particularly when the opposition is lead by a religious zealot.

  37. 37.

    RJ

    June 24, 2010 at 8:43 pm

    @LD50: Is Australia really that major an ally? Henry Kissinger once commented that he didn’t htink about Australia when he was shaving in the morning. It’s a country of some 23 million people on the other side of the world. Its size and geography make it pretty unimportant, though it routinely likes to boast of its skill in diplomatic fora. Perhaps it became viewed as a major ally when former PM John Howard gave everything W wanted and more.

  38. 38.

    RJ

    June 24, 2010 at 8:45 pm

    @toujoursdan: She didn’t dump the proposed mining tax – she dumped the govt’s advertising campaign promoting it (in return for the mining companies dumping their own ads). The tax is still on the table.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - way2blue - SINALEI, SAMOA—RESPITE EDITION—FEBRUARY 2025.  (second of five) 7
Image by way2blue (7/13/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • me on Boomer Nostalgia Open Thread: Nuclear Terrors (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:51pm)
  • Betty on Government-Sanctioned Manslaughter by the Trump Crime Cartel (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:48pm)
  • Baud on Boomer Nostalgia Open Thread: Nuclear Terrors (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:48pm)
  • Jackie on Government-Sanctioned Manslaughter by the Trump Crime Cartel (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:48pm)
  • Betty on Government-Sanctioned Manslaughter by the Trump Crime Cartel (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:46pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!