• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

American History and Black History Cannot Be Separated

T R E 4 5 O N

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

You cannot shame the shameless.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

We still have time to mess this up!

Take your GOP plan out of the witness protection program.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Let’s finish the job.

The revolution will be supervised.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Sports / The Championship Game Open Thread

The Championship Game Open Thread

by Randinho|  July 11, 20102:07 pm| 480 Comments

This post is in: Sports

FacebookTweetEmail

This is it!  Who takes home the trophy?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread
Next Post: Scaling Up the Factory Jobs »

Reader Interactions

480Comments

  1. 1.

    Joel

    July 11, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    Spain.

  2. 2.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    We do. Two deserving sides that (mostly — one exception) play the game the right way. A first time winner. Great head line players.

    As someone that thinks that ESPN far under-performs as a sports network (see James, LeBron), let me give them kudos for generally very good coverage that did not dumb down the game for the American audience.

    eric

  3. 3.

    cmorenc

    July 11, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    Two wonderfully well-matched, high-quality teams for this final, both of whom play a very attractive style of ball. Despite some commentators given an edge to Spain, IMHO the outcome of this one is impossible to predict. I predict a very close, dramatic game.

    If I have to pick one, it will be the Dutch jumping into the canals of Amsterdam in joy from a dramatic goal in the last 20 minutes that holds up, despite a furious Spanish attack toward the end with a couple of near-misses just before the final whistle.

    Pay no attention to the prognosticators, pro or amateur, or me. It will be a great, worthy game that will be forever mentioned as an immortal classic of WC finals.

  4. 4.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    I only watch a few game of soccer every four years but…. Spain doesn’t look overpowering, and the Dutch have a lot of weapons. But if they press to break Spanish possession they will leave themselves open.

    1-1, going to penalty kicks.

  5. 5.

    cmorenc

    July 11, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    @Eric

    As someone that thinks that ESPN far under-performs as a sports network (see James, LeBron), let me give them kudos for generally very good coverage that did not dumb down the game for the American audience.

    THAT.

    Kudos to ABC when they took their turn with the higher-profile weekend games too (same commentators and producers as ESPN, so praise for one is praise for both).

  6. 6.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    I’ll be pulling for Spain, btw. The Dutch attacking style is more entertaining but all their diving makes them villains. Spain is one of the cleanest teams I’ve seen in a dozen or so games, definitely white hats here.

  7. 7.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    I’ve had Spain winning for two years, and I’ll stick with the pick…But I’m rooting for the Dutch.

  8. 8.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    Bring it on! Got my World Cup menu posted (and lots of silliness too): http://pieceofcakekitchen.com/

  9. 9.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    Spain – because of the octopus

  10. 10.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    @mattt: allow me to speak for many: Please FSM, NO PENALTY KICKS!

  11. 11.

    sherifffruitfly

    July 11, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    I’m not especially a fan of soccer (soccer/hockey share the same fundamental flaw), but I’ve enjoyed this world cup – even despite those gawdawful horns.

    I think the reason I’ve enjoyed this WC is that I online game, and interact with people from all of these countries on a regular basis. It’s almost impossible not to get a little caught up in the hoopla in that situation. I work with a large number of internationals as well, but they’re mostly from the same place, so that effect isn’t as strong.

    I wonder how many other young(-ish) gamers have a similar experience – hearing serbs smacktalking french (and vice-versa, of course), and such things on a daily basis, and feel a bit more “in” as a result?

    More broadly, I wonder if the popularity of online gaming can do any work towards lessening “stupid American” provincialism?

  12. 12.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    July 11, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    Funny how the end of the Dutch anthem is the middle of ours.

  13. 13.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    @Therese: I don’t know. I would probably have the crema catalana for dessert.

  14. 14.

    stuckinred

    July 11, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    I have some Colombian friends who are supposed to be coming over to watch. If they do I’ll not be able to hang out here so I want to thank Randinho for doing this. . .it made the World Cup even more interesting than it otherwise would have been.

  15. 15.

    valdivia

    July 11, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    going against Paul the Octopus. I hope the Orange team wins. Sorry i wont be able to hang out here either going off to watch with some friends.

  16. 16.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    @eric: As I was typing my penalty kick prediction I thought: boy, that’s a cop out!

    Either way it will be great to see one of two good soccer countries win for the 1st time.

  17. 17.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    @Randinho: I was too drunk on the sangria to research any desserts! The mussels were fantastic though.

  18. 18.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    I wanted the Dutch to win since England got dumped, but the Spanish have converted me. They will win in regular time.

  19. 19.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    Oh, for fuck’s sake…Two idiots brought vuvuzelas to the bar at which I’m watching the game.

  20. 20.

    superfly

    July 11, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    @eric:

    We do. Two deserving sides that (mostly—one exception) play the game the right way. A first time winner. Great head line players.
    As someone that thinks that ESPN far under-performs as a sports network (see James, LeBron), let me give them kudos for generally very good coverage that did not dumb down the game for the American audience.

    Yep. I actually emailed them to tell them so, don’t know if it will get read by anyone that matters, but wanted them to know.

  21. 21.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    Kuyt working already.

  22. 22.

    licensed to kill time

    July 11, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    I’m rooting for de Nederlands for reasons that have nothing to do with futbol, but Hup, Holland, Hup!

  23. 23.

    PanAmerican

    July 11, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    Adidas vs. Nike? I like Adidas 1-0.

  24. 24.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    July 11, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    @Andy K: Where’s a giant octopus when you need one.

  25. 25.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    @Bill E Pilgrim:

    No shit!

    (-)63 months, but these people might get me drinking again…

  26. 26.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    @mattt:

    Spain is one of the cleanest teams I’ve seen in a dozen or so games, definitely white hats here.

    Which games have you been watching? Those guys drop if they’re sneezed on. I’ll grant you that they aren’t hackers though, only three yellow cards in the whole tournament.

  27. 27.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 2:39 pm

    No test of our “white kit” theory here.

    Spain with the first chance, and that was way too easy.

  28. 28.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 11, 2010 at 2:39 pm

    Over at Time mag, movie critic Richard Corliss — who has an international readership, and so really ought to know better — is giving a late-in-the-season example of the American pundit looking down his nose at soccer. This kind of thing pops up in the US media every four years without fail, always (and only ever) during World Cup season. I’m intrigued by this phenomenon. It suggests an insecurity about football in some American circles that the rest of Earth just doesn’t have about sports largely identified with the US like baseball and the gridiron sport. Any thoughts from the Balloon Juice commentariat?

    I’m enjoying this final the way Led Zeppelin ventured into Kashmir –with no predictions, but an open faith.

  29. 29.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    What time does the Dutch team arrive at teh game?

  30. 30.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    @Bootlegger: I only saw half the Switzerland game and all of Germany. I was thinking of the fouls but they can’t dive half as much as the Dutch, either…..of course “Clean” is relative.

  31. 31.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    Looks like both teams will press the full field.

  32. 32.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    Netherlands 3-2

  33. 33.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    @eric:

    Ah, they’re just playin’ possum. Same as they did against Brazil.

  34. 34.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    @Andy K: Except Brazil is not half the “team” as the Spanairds

  35. 35.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    What separates a clean tackle from a foul?

  36. 36.

    Comrade Mary

    July 11, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    My favourite colour is orange, I go for the underdog, and I like to think I’m smarter than a piece of calamari. Hup Holland Hup!

  37. 37.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    @Amir_Khalid: We know how pale our “American” sports are compared to World Football, and I mean in terms of popularity. We simply can’t stand not being the center of the world’s attention. Of course we can’t even win the world championship in two of our “own” sports anymore and that only adds to the anxiety. These quadrennial sneers are the equivalent of tweenie girl jealousy: “I sooo hate her, cuz she’s like, such a bitch, ya know.”

  38. 38.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    Puyol is just an unfrozen caveman who landed a spot on the Spanish team. Your yellow card frightens and confuses him!

  39. 39.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    The diving is already on my nerves.

  40. 40.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    @mattt: The will dive as much as the Dutch, and really its only Robben that cries.

    Oh, there ya go, a hard tackle and the Spanish player acting like he stepped on an IED.

  41. 41.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    @TR: bravo!

  42. 42.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    @eric:

    True, that, but I don’t think the Dutch woke up until just after we started this conversation.

  43. 43.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    @Andy K: The Dutch were a much better team after the half vs Uruguay, too.

    @You don’t say: I wonder too. I think if you kick the ball before the opposing player, just about any leg contact is ok. Anyone care to correct my ignorance?

    It seems like a lot of upper body contact is allowed and I have no idea what the “line” is there.

  44. 44.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    @You Don’t Say: If you get the ball before the man is generally the rule. An exception is a tackle from behind.

    Ah, and there’s Robben pounding the grass after Captain Caveman, Spain’s bass player, took his feet out.

  45. 45.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    @TR:

    Puyol Kathy Griffin is just an unfrozen caveman who landed a spot on the Spanish team. Your yellow card frightens and confuses him!

    FIFY

  46. 46.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    and my earlier noted exception performs as expected. Waste of a yellow card this early in the game

  47. 47.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    @mattt: Upper body contact is “officially” ok if it is shoulder to shoulder. That said you will see a lot of holding and use of the arms that is technically illegal but so ubiquitous it is only called in the most egregious and obvious instances, kind of like the hand-check in the NBA.

  48. 48.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    @Comrade Mary: The pedant in me must point out that calamari is squid. Octopus is polpo in Italian.

  49. 49.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    @Bootlegger: Thanks. But aren’t they already in motion before it’s determined who gets to the ball first? Like a late hit in A. football? Sometimes it’s unavoidable.

  50. 50.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    One more, and the Spanish will have doubled their yellow card total for the tournament. Van Bommel deserves one on general principles.

  51. 51.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    @ bootlegger: And Kuyt and van Bommel and the midfielder with the Russian-sounding name….

    PS. van Bommel is a thug.

  52. 52.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    Nice hug between two players with yellows already — like siblings making a show of their love for each other just so mom doesn’t get mad at them

  53. 53.

    Comrade Mary

    July 11, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    @Randinho: True, but the key to insulting an opponent is not just to cast aspersions on them, but to get some nagging fact about them wrong.

    (I am now imagining an indignant cephalopod rapping on the glass in Morse code, insisting that it is NOT a damn foreigner of a squid. Delicious.)

  54. 54.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    Have Dutch had ball possession more in the first 25 minutes than the Germans did in the entire semi-final?

  55. 55.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    @You Don’t Say: Yeah, so if I beat you to the ball and then you slide into me its a foul and if you come in too hard or with your studs up you will be carded. Those balls where both players are charging in full speed are called “50-50” balls, or more colorfully, “hospital balls”.

  56. 56.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    @TR: They’re former club teammates.

  57. 57.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    Thanks for replies to my confusion.

    I figured out why many Americans don’t like soccer….no commercial breaks to get up and get another beer.

  58. 58.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    @You Don’t Say: think of it like a blocked shot in basketball…if you hit the arm it is a foul: if you hit the leg first it is a foul; if you get all ball on the block but the body slams into the shooter it is a foul: if you get the ball first but you get the body in a violent way after, you can still get the foul (especially if from behind).

    eric

  59. 59.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    This is going to be ugly… and if it’s going to be that way, I want to see a few red cards.

  60. 60.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 11, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    @You Don’t Say: Generally, going for the ball = clean tackle; going for the player = dirty tackle. Sliding tackles and tackles from behind are considered dangerous play; depending on the referee’s assessment of the potential/actual damage, these tackles can merit either a yellow card or a red card.

  61. 61.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    Nigel de Jong should be walking to the dressing room now.

  62. 62.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    That was worth a red. Jesus.

  63. 63.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    Wow. That was ugly.

  64. 64.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    De Jong is lucky that wasn’t a red. That was some Karate Kid shit.

  65. 65.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    @Randinho: Which makes for interesting drama sometimes because they may be old pals and pat each on the butt, or like Rooney and Ronaldo, fundamentally dislike each other to begin with and when they meet in the World Cup one gets the other ejected.

  66. 66.

    PanAmerican

    July 11, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    That’s a straight red.

  67. 67.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    Get your Nigel deJong doll today- Now with Kung Fu Action!

  68. 68.

    Donald

    July 11, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    de Jong is a bastard. Not as bad as evil Luis Suarez of course, but that kick on X Alonso was absurdly dangerous.

  69. 69.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    After van Bommel kicking Iniesta in the achilles and now de Jong’s kung fu move….anybody still rooting for the Dutch?

  70. 70.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    @mattt: set the cooler next to your chair and hold the piss for halftime.

  71. 71.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    @mattt: or go to the bathroom!

  72. 72.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    Right now the Spaniards are the best futbol team and the Dutch are the best rugby team.

  73. 73.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    @mattt: And Puyol’s tackle was a love tap? Gimme a break. Both of the these teams are playing very physically right now and the ref has decided to give the warnings early. I agree with some others, there will be a red or two in this one.

  74. 74.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    @PanAmerican: No blood, no red appears to be the rule. Hard to give anyone a red card now after letting that pass.

  75. 75.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    Does Puyol get carded for fouling his own goalie?

  76. 76.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    @Randinho: It’s a contact sport, no a ballet.

  77. 77.

    Donald

    July 11, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    These yellow cards, Puyol and a faceful of his own keeper’s crotch…who says soccer’s not a contact sport?

  78. 78.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    Thanks for responses. Slow mo helps. Don’t know how refs see it all in real time. I know, I know: they don’t. ;-)

  79. 79.

    shirk

    July 11, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    Spain started winning me over with their clean commanding play in the win over Germany, and with De Jong’s cleats embedded in Alonso’s chest, my conversion’s complete. La Roja over the thuggish Oranje!

  80. 80.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    uninspired play for the last 15 or so,.

  81. 81.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    @eric: You can bet if De Jong even sneezes on someone now he will be gone. A good time for a Spanish dive.

  82. 82.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    @Bootlegger: It’s not rugby. De Jong would have been at least sent to the sin bin for that.

  83. 83.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    I just realized this matchup is like the NBA Finals in the late ’80s between Magic Johnson’s Lakers and Bill Laimbeer’s Pistons. Too soon to say if it’s 1988 or 1989 yet.

  84. 84.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    @eric: as soon as I write that two nice plays.

  85. 85.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    Whiff!!!

  86. 86.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    @shirk: Spain gives as good as they get, surely you see that.

  87. 87.

    Peter J

    July 11, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    This is it! Who takes home the trophy?

    This guy won’t, despite his efforts.

  88. 88.

    Donald

    July 11, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    Pedro making that little charge looked faster than Torres looked all tournament. I don’t think anyone should blame del Bosque for keeping Torres off the starting side. (And maybe no one really is blaming him, but Torres is a big name.)

  89. 89.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    @TR:

    If there’s a cheap foul call near the end that costs the Netherlands, it will be ’88. I’m still pissed about the call at the end of game 6 that year.

  90. 90.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    @Randinho: Except that he was actually playing a live ball, his foot wasn’t just up in the air. “Dangerous play”? Of course, but he was clearly after the ball and I’ve seen the person kicked called for the dangerous play before if they put their body in front of a boot playing a ball.

  91. 91.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    He may be a whiner, but Arjen Robben certainly backchecks play defense conscientiously.

  92. 92.

    Svensker

    July 11, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    Rough but boring. Reminds me of something….

  93. 93.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    Not referring to the last 3-5 minutes but van Persie looks more active and involved today, as though he played previous games w/o enough sleep. Ignorant prediction: he’ll score or be involved in a goal today.

  94. 94.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    @TR: The Lakers weren’t exactly angels.

  95. 95.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    @Svensker: sex?

  96. 96.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    @TR:

    I can see that. Van Brommel is definitely Laimbeer and de Jong can be Rodman.

  97. 97.

    Xopher

    July 11, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    Go Netherlands!

  98. 98.

    shirk

    July 11, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    @Bootlegger: I do see a difference of degree, not of kind.

  99. 99.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    I want to see BLOOD! (There isn’t much beauty in the game anyway)

  100. 100.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    @Svensker: Pam Anderson Tommy Lee tapes?

  101. 101.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    @Bootlegger: I don’t see that he was after the ball at all. I’m following this on three live coverage sites in addition to watching it and they don’t see that either.

  102. 102.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    One of the two Duch halfbacks is going to see red before this is done.

  103. 103.

    Michael

    July 11, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    Ugh. Hooked it.

  104. 104.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    WOW! No card for Sneijder there. Jebus, Howard…..

  105. 105.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    @Bootlegger:

    I hope not.

  106. 106.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    This is not pretty, Sneijder was looking at the man not the ball when he raised his spikes going into the collision.

  107. 107.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    @Randinho: The ball was bouncing high, that’s why his foot was there. He missed, by a lot, but there was a ball there.

  108. 108.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    Look: Futbol.

  109. 109.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    Spain has looked the better side, but the Dutch have had the better scoring chances, it seems to me.

  110. 110.

    jomo

    July 11, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    It feels as though the dutch are interfering with the Spanish flow more than any other team so far. This really could go either way.

  111. 111.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    Those were a few nice chances. Hopefully a sign of things to come in the second half.

  112. 112.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:17 pm

    @shirk: Yeah, I’ll give you that. The two Dutch destroyers are clearly trying to slow down the Spanish midfield with physical play. All of these yellow cards will make them back off, or face playing a man or two down.

  113. 113.

    Donald

    July 11, 2010 at 3:17 pm

    Dirk Kuyt looks a little bit like Alex Winter (i.e. Ted, not Bill) — specifically in the Lost Boys

    http://media.photobucket.com/image/alex%20winter%20lost%20boys/dancewithme220/AlexWinter-marco-LostBoys.jpg

  114. 114.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 3:18 pm

    @Bootlegger: I’m rooting for the Dutch, but even I think you’re overstating your case. I didn’t think he was really going for the ball, more using its presence as an excuse.

    However, I think one of the Spaniards just kicked de Jong in the face, so it’s evening up.

  115. 115.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 3:19 pm

    @jomo:

    It seems that the Dutch are actually aiming to make the most fouls possible without getting a red card. When Sneijder made that foul, it must have been his “turn” to get his yellow card. There are still 8 dutch players left without a warning…

  116. 116.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    July 11, 2010 at 3:19 pm

    Well, if they allow weapons in the second half, I’ll say the Dutch win. But Otherwise I’ll go with Spain.

  117. 117.

    shirk

    July 11, 2010 at 3:19 pm

    Ugliness aside, props to the Dutch for knocking Spain off the rhythm of their possession game. If the Spanish can’t adjust and get more control in the second half, I could easily see a Dutch 1-0 win when one of their counterattacks finds the net.

  118. 118.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    @Bootlegger: Not anywhere near he could have reached it with his foot.

  119. 119.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    If Spain doesn’t score earlier in the second half, I would put in Torres. I know he hasn’t had a great Cup so far, but Villa is being surrounded by three guys. Torres also isn’t 5’2 like the rest of the Spanish team; they could maybe get some headers from him.

  120. 120.

    Donald

    July 11, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    Klinsmann was a better commentator during this WC than Lalas or McManaman. If we can’t have him in charge of USMNT can we at least get him on the TV more?

  121. 121.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 11, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    When Xabi Alonso was playing for Liverpool, he managed on two occasions to score from behind the center line. Those were truly magnificent goals to see. It would be lovely to see him do that today.

  122. 122.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal:

    I didn’t think he was really going for the ball, more using its presence as an excuse.

    Oh, I quite agree with you, I was just pointing out that he wasn’t simply doing a flying karate kick in the middle of the field. It was clearly a foul and I’ve seen red given for that before. I suspect the referee was convinced “enough” that it was a (dangerous) play on the ball as opposed to the man so went for his yellow card instead.

  123. 123.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    @Randinho: But it was there. Look, I’m not saying it wasn’t a foul, just arguing for why it wasn’t red (but could have been).

  124. 124.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    Bootlegger: They just showed it again. It ddin’t even look like he was anywhere near the ball.

  125. 125.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    The Torres sub sounds good on paper but when they subbed him in the semi he looked like he was pouting.

  126. 126.

    Donald

    July 11, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    @Amir_Khalid referring to these http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZVwexsBUFU

    The second is really great. The music sucks.

  127. 127.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    The sub Spain needs is Robocop.

  128. 128.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    @Bill E Pilgrim:

    LOL!

  129. 129.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:27 pm

    @Randinho: They just showed it three times and the ball is right there, at the same height as his foot, but he was clearly beaten to the ball. The cynical part by De Jong is that he didn’t even try to pull it back when he realized he couldn’t get there.

  130. 130.

    Peter J

    July 11, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    This guy won’t, despite his efforts.

    He even got his own wikipedia page.
    And he’s not the worst today, that would be how the Dutch are playing, they should have a collection of red cards, not yellow.

  131. 131.

    Cat Lady

    July 11, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    Bert van Marwijk is a silver fox.

    That is all.

  132. 132.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    Hey, where’s all the women at? Don’t tell me that my man-crush on Diego Forlan scared ’em all off.

  133. 133.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    @Bootlegger: I think that’s a generous interpretation.

  134. 134.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    @Bootlegger: watching the replay, it looked to me that he actually drove his foot into the chest. Ug-lee.

  135. 135.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    @Bootlegger: No way. Alonso headed the ball away. It was coming in the air at least 18 inches above de Jong’s foot. Even Ruud Gullit said he should have been given a red card.

  136. 136.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    @Cat Lady: Is that the Dutch coach? If so, I concur.

  137. 137.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    One thing about American football is that it’s honest about its violence. Soccer is The Beautiful Game? Not today, not yet.

  138. 138.

    Cat Lady

    July 11, 2010 at 3:33 pm

    @You Don’t Say:

    Dutch coach. I’d like to be “coached”. :-D

  139. 139.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    After I said van Persie looked more alert….it looked like he could have gotten to that.

  140. 140.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    @You Don’t Say: Whatever, the ball is clearly there and both players ran hard to the ball. Yes, it could have been red. Yes, De Jong could have pulled it back and kneed him instead. But I’ve been kicked in the face before and I was called for the foul for bringing my head down into someone’s high foot. I’m not saying its a good call or De Jong is an angel. Just sayin’.

  141. 141.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 3:35 pm

    @mattt:

    Rugby is most honest about its violence. If there’s a problem, they settle it on the pitch.

    @Andy K:

    Hey, where’s all the women at?

    I’m here!

  142. 142.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    @mattt: It’s a contact sport.

    Puyol just went for a decapitation, the defender ducked that flying elbow or it may have been.

  143. 143.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    @Cat Lady:

    Bert van Marwijk is a silver fox.

    With scarf on loan from The Special One.

  144. 144.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    @Andy K:

    (waving hand) I’m here! I’m here! Iker all the way, baby.

  145. 145.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    @Randinho: He missed the header! It looked more like he was trying to body charge De Jong and draw the foul. Nothing wrong with that IMO.

  146. 146.

    MikeJ

    July 11, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    @Cat Lady:

    Dutch coach. I’d like to be “coached”

    Start with 5 minutes of keepy uppie.

  147. 147.

    jeffreyw

    July 11, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    test

  148. 148.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    @Cat Lady:
    Yeah he is. The scarf is a nice touch.

  149. 149.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    @Violet:

    As the /b/ros say, tits and a timestamp or it’s fake!

    :D

    Keeeeding! Because I care, ya know.

  150. 150.

    jeffreyw

    July 11, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    help! can’t comment! help me WordPress goblin!

  151. 151.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    @Bootlegger: You must be watching a diffrent play because the ball comes off Alonso’s head just before de Jong cleats him in the chest.

  152. 152.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    After my griping about Dutch thuggery that looked like a raw call on van Bronckhorst

  153. 153.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    What, exactly, did van Bronckhorst do there? To me, it looked more like the Spanish player just ran into him.

  154. 154.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    De Jong just had to pull up from a midfield challenge because he’s carrying a card. You won’t see anymore bone breakers from him unless he’s sure.

    Spain just demonstrated one of their favorite techniques, run into your defender, fall down, and get the foul.

  155. 155.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    @Andy K:
    Lolz. You’ll get neither, but I can gush over David Villa a bit more to help convince you. :P

  156. 156.

    Donald

    July 11, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    Referee has become a 12th man for Spain in his own mind.

  157. 157.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    i give david villa a 9.6 for that dive

  158. 158.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    Shitty late call, responding to the bench.

  159. 159.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    @Randinho: Barely and he could have made a clean header if he wasn’t running right at De Jong. Look, Spain does this all the time, run into a defender and draw a foul. A particularly maddening version is when they are running shoulder to shoulder and the fall in front of the defender and draw a PK.

  160. 160.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    @Violet:

    A guy can dream, can’t he?

  161. 161.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    Do the players trash talk in English as the common language?

  162. 162.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    Van Bronckhorst threw his arm out into Ramos’ path. Ramos may have made a meal of it, but Van Bronckhorst is not completely blameless.

  163. 163.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    That could’ve peen a PK.

  164. 164.

    Cat Lady

    July 11, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    @MikeJ:

    Not exactly the kind of ball juggling jiggling I was thinking of. YMMV.

  165. 165.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 3:47 pm

    C’mon, ladies, it’s the world cup final. If there were ever a match in which no one is going to pull out of a challenge, this is it. The officiating should reflect that.

  166. 166.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:47 pm

    @You Don’t Say: Depends on if they want their opponent to understand it. In the ’06 final that Italian player that Zidane headbutted was talking about his sister in French.

  167. 167.

    shirk

    July 11, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    Hey, does anyone know if there’s a soccer match anywhere on TV right now? I seem to have tuned in to a street brawl by mistake.

  168. 168.

    jomo

    July 11, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    Now the game is turning into the flop-olympics on both sides.

  169. 169.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    @Randinho: True enough, but Spain are starting to really dish it out now.

  170. 170.

    Svensker

    July 11, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    @Andy K:

    Hey, where’s all the women at? Don’t tell me that my man-crush on Diego Forlan scared ‘em all off.

    Working and listening on the radio — running into the TV room when the (very) occasional exciting something happens.

    I’ll see your man crush on Diego and raise you…. hmm, that doesn’t sound right. The Dutch coach is cute, too. Mmm, mmm, mmm.

    This game stinks.

  171. 171.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:49 pm

    OOooooooH!

  172. 172.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 3:49 pm

    Aaaaahhhhhhhhhhh!

  173. 173.

    shirk

    July 11, 2010 at 3:49 pm

    OMG how did Robben not put that away? Casillas just used up his allotment of good luck getting his foot on that…

  174. 174.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 3:49 pm

    Casillas got luuuuuuucky

  175. 175.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    Wow.

  176. 176.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    Casillas is absolutely amazing, amazingly lucky there, good job “getting big”.

  177. 177.

    John Cole

    July 11, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    De Jong just had to pull up from a midfield challenge because he’s carrying a card. You won’t see anymore bone breakers from him unless he’s sure.

    Spain just demonstrated one of their favorite techniques, run into your defender, fall down, and get the foul.

    De Jong shouldn’t even be in the game anymore.

  178. 178.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    @Andy K:
    Dream on!

    I can’t believe it’s the 62nd minute and the score is still 0-0.

  179. 179.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    Aaaaaaaaarrrrrrrgggggghhhhhh!

  180. 180.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    Save of the tournament

  181. 181.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    @Bootlegger: Quite a difference from “He missed the header.”

    St. Iker!

  182. 182.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    @John Cole: bah, its a contact sport.

  183. 183.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    @Randinho: No, it isn’t. A glancing half-header is a “missed” header.

  184. 184.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    @Bootlegger:

    Flag went up before Ramos dragged down Heitinga.

  185. 185.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    @Svensker:

    This game stinks.

    It sure does. It’s boring. I can’t believe I missed seeing both semifinals. They sounded like really good matches.

  186. 186.

    Mary G

    July 11, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Forgive mt American ignorance, but why is the clock going up instead of down?

  187. 187.

    stormhit

    July 11, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    @Bootlegger:

    “Playing in a dangerous manner is defined as any action that, while trying to play the ball, threatens injury to someone (including the player himself). It is committed with an opponent nearby and prevents the opponent from playing the ball for fear of injury.”

    Your notion that it’s not a foul because the ball is nearby isn’t what the rule is. If you bring your leg up that high you leave yourself open to being called for it, no matter your intention. And that’s if you don’t connect– if you do it’s always a card.

  188. 188.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    FWIW who fouled Xavi just then? I didn’t see any contact there.

  189. 189.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 3:54 pm

    @Mary G: Maybe because they can add minutes during the game, which I still don’t understand. ;-)

  190. 190.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    @burnspbesq: Sure, I’m not disputing the call just saying that Spain dishes out the physical play as much as any team, usually more IMO though the Dutch are going toe-to-toe with them.

  191. 191.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    @You Don’t Say:

    Maybe because they can add minutes during the game, which I still don’t understand. ;-)

    Time is added when play stops due to an injury/card. Pretty simple, really.

  192. 192.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    @stormhit: Don’t straw man me boy, I never said it “wasn’t a foul”.

  193. 193.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    @Mary G: The only official time is kept on the field by the referee.

  194. 194.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    @Mary G:
    Clock goes up in rugby too. Since football started in England, as did rugby, maybe it’s an English thing? It’s harder to follow because you have to do some calculations to figure out how much time is left rather than just having the clock show the remaining time.

  195. 195.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    Jesus, it’s like the ball doesn’t want to go in.

  196. 196.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    @Lysana: Thanks for calling me stupid. ;-)

  197. 197.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    Big save, Stecklenburg.

  198. 198.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    I think these teams are doomed to eternal penalty kicks.

  199. 199.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    @Bootlegger: The ball went straight up. He didn’t miss the header.

  200. 200.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    At least there are some shots on goal this second half. The first half was not very exciting.

  201. 201.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    @Alex S.: I don’t think I’ll make it if this goes to a shoot out. Please no.

  202. 202.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    Kuyt comes off? No offense to Sneijder, but I think Kuyt has been their best player in this tournament.

  203. 203.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:00 pm

    @Violet: Football started in England and split into Association Football (soccer, from the “soc”) and Rugby Union Football. So its no coincidence that they both play a running 45 minute clock.

  204. 204.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 4:00 pm

    @You Don’t Say:

    Thanks for calling me stupid. ;-)

    Dude, don’t troll.

  205. 205.

    mcd410x

    July 11, 2010 at 4:00 pm

    @Violet: Clock goes up in hockey, too, even if it doesn’t on the scoreboard.

  206. 206.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: He’s a bit slow. If the Dutch plan to score while they still have 11 players on the field, they’ll need some speed.

  207. 207.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    How many WC finals have been decided by a shoot out?

  208. 208.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    @Lysana: Then don’t call me stupid.

    They stop the clock in most timed sports.

  209. 209.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    at 203 entries in this thread, you might think Greenwald would have come up at least once ;)

  210. 210.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 4:02 pm

    Kuyt was an odd sub out. Playing great and one of the few Dutchmen without a card, right?

  211. 211.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:02 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: I think they want some more speed down that flank. Kuyt has the biggest engine you’ll ever find but he’s painfully slow and not as comfortable on the ball.

  212. 212.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 11, 2010 at 4:02 pm

    I suspect we’ll be seeing this stalemate go into extra time.

    (There. That should provoke the football gods to give us a goal or two.)

  213. 213.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 4:02 pm

    Ramos, you baby, get up and play.

  214. 214.

    John Cole

    July 11, 2010 at 4:02 pm

    @Bootlegger: Well, if anything goes because someone can glibly smirk that “it’s a contact sport,” I hope someone runs up and squarely kicks von Bommel in the nuts.

  215. 215.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    @Randinho: Yes he did. What? He meant to pop it straight up in midfield?

  216. 216.

    shirk

    July 11, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    …and the fans in the stands are getting annoyed enough with the flopping that you can hear the whistles over the vuvuzelas…

  217. 217.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    @You Don’t Say:

    Then don’t call me stupid.

    Since I didn’t call you stupid, you’re trolling.

  218. 218.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    @eric:

    Knowing how wrong he is about everything else, one assumes Greenwald is a Chelsea fan.

  219. 219.

    Donald

    July 11, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    @Alex S.

    That header maybe was as good a chance as the one Robben had

  220. 220.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    So I see my “teams who wear white lose” theory is still working reasonably well. Germany lost to Spain while wearing white. Neither Uruguay nor the Netherlands wore white, but Uruguay’s goalkeeper was in white and they lost.

    Not sure how my theory applies to today’s game. It looks like the Netherlands are wearing a tiny bit of white on their uniforms, so perhaps they’ll lose?

    The ball just doesn’t want to go in the net, does it?

  221. 221.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    @eric:

    This game is almost as painful as a Greenwald rant.

  222. 222.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    Ramos, come on

  223. 223.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    @John Cole: That would be sweet, and if he does it under the pretense of playing the ball he may escape with a yellow as De Jong did.

  224. 224.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    Van Bommel deserves it, but that foul by Iniesta was cheap.

  225. 225.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    @Therese:

    Two, iirc. Two too many.

  226. 226.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @Bootlegger: You mean you’ve never headed a ball straight up to control it as it comes down?

  227. 227.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    Best call yet: “van Bommel over-ate the pudding.”

  228. 228.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    @Donald:

    It was a part of the cosmic equilibrium that manifests itself on the field.

  229. 229.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    Now who’s being chippy? Two cheap shots behind the play.

  230. 230.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    @Alex S.: I blame Obama for this nil-nil foul-fest and his refusal to call torture torture has allowed such rugged football.

  231. 231.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    @Bootlegger:
    Rugby Union has 40 minute halves, not 45 minutes. But yeah, it did come from football. I wonder why they have five fewer minutes per half?

  232. 232.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    @Randinho: Come on, that isn’t what he was doing. You don’t try that move with a defender charging at you. Controlling a ball in the open field, yeah, but not under pressure.

  233. 233.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    July 11, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    @Therese:

    How many WC finals have been decided by a shoot out?

    This may be the first that literally gets to that point the way it’s going.

  234. 234.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    Guardian live blog:

    76 min: It’s 0-0!

  235. 235.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    One too many touches for Iniesta. Take the shot!

  236. 236.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    @Violet: Duh, you’re right, thanks for the correction.

  237. 237.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    The Dutch are hanging on right now.

  238. 238.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:10 pm

    @eric:

    True, also, this game would be much more civil if Guantánamo was closed.

  239. 239.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    I guess that’s why they fall down all the time. Stay on your feet and even the blatant fouls don’t get called.

  240. 240.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    If Robben goes down, Puyol goes off.

  241. 241.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    @Bootlegger: Funny, that’s what Ramos just did.

    Poor Robben. He’s just doesn’t know when to dive, does he?

  242. 242.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    @Bill E Pilgrim: Five extra-time finals, two went to PKs including the last one.

  243. 243.

    Ash Can

    July 11, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    @Lysana: Yes, you did call YDS stupid, whether you realize it or not. And I’m with YDS on this one. This is the one thing that has confounded me the most about soccer, that the clock doesn’t stop when the action does. As far as I can tell, the seasoned fan can keep track of actual play time with a sharp eye and a stopwatch, or at least a sweep second hand. We more casual fans, however, are left guessing.

  244. 244.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    @Therese:

    How many WC finals have been decided by a shoot out?

    Women’s World Cup between USA and China was decided by shootout. I wound up in a Chinese restaurant for that one. My husband and I shook hands with the owner of the restaurant who was watching with us at the end, all of us standing, happy with how the game went.

  245. 245.

    J.A.F. Rusty Shackleford

    July 11, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    Am I the only one who thinks that Arjen Robben looks like Zinedine Zidane?

  246. 246.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    July 11, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: Bingo.

    Americans just don’t understand melodrama, I swear ;)

  247. 247.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    @Randinho: Yeah, that was weird, I kept waiting for his feet to fly out from under him. Ramos was standing still, not running full speed after a 50-50 ball.

  248. 248.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    Did I hear the announcers right? If Robben goes down after Puyol’s attempted trip, which clearly impeded him, he gets a free/penalty kick (not sure the term), but by staying up he gets nothing? No wonder they dive.

  249. 249.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    July 11, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    @Bootlegger: I was making a joke. Literally a shoot out.

    Over and out.

  250. 250.

    mcd410x

    July 11, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    The joy of Cesc!

  251. 251.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    @Bootlegger: Neither was Alonso

  252. 252.

    ed_finnerty

    July 11, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    1994 and 2006 that I remember – there may have been more

  253. 253.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    @Bootlegger:
    Still wonder why the halves are different times. They must have shortened the halves for rugby. Maybe because it’s even more physically demanding than football? (Disclosure: my household watches a lot of rugby and will be glued to the TV for the Rugby World Cup next year.)

  254. 254.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    @Ash Can:

    Yes, you did call YDS stupid, whether you realize it or not

    I said the reason was pretty simple. I never impugned YDS’s intelligence. If having a basic concept explained to someone means they’re being called stupid, this is not my reality.

  255. 255.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    @Ash Can: I went to a game in Stuttgart and half way through the first half asked my German friends where the game clock was. They pointed to a standard clock near the scoreboard and said “the game starts at 2, each half is 45 minutes and halftime is 15.”

  256. 256.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    As a casual watcher I kind of like the ambiguity in time, not sure when it’s going to end.

  257. 257.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    @Mary G:

    Something to do with entropy, the arrow of time, etc.

  258. 258.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    The clock doesn’t stop so the flow of the game can continue. I’m a huge NFL fan, but the fits and starts and constant commercials is maddening. I really don’t get how 45 minutes of nonstop action is a bad thing.

  259. 259.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    @Bill E Pilgrim: Ah, whoosh, right over my head.

  260. 260.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    Hehehe, van Persie wouldn’t have scored either.

  261. 261.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    @J.A.F. Rusty Shackleford:

    I can see that. I think Sneijder looks like Andre Agassi.

  262. 262.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    I thought Persie was onside there. There was another defender across the pitch behind him.

  263. 263.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    @Violet:

    Maybe because it’s even more physically demanding than football?

    That’s only because the players are not naturally bipedal.

  264. 264.

    jeffreyw

    July 11, 2010 at 4:19 pm

    booger, i’m stuck in spam i think

  265. 265.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 4:19 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal:

    Offside by a smidge.

  266. 266.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:19 pm

    @Randinho: Yes he was. That ball was bouncing in midfield and both players were moving toward each other. Look, it was clearly a foul, I’m just saying that the ref likely considered it a rash play on the ball and that is why he gave yellow instead of red. And Alonso was looking for the foul. Also.
    I’m done with this topic.

  267. 267.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:20 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: He was clearly a yard off per the replay.

  268. 268.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    July 11, 2010 at 4:20 pm

    @Leeds man: FTW

  269. 269.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:20 pm

    @TR:
    Yeah, I love that about watching this World Cup. The game isn’t interrupted by stupid commercials. And there’s no fake timeout like a “two minute warning” or “commercial time out” just to show TV ads. It’s a nice change from the usual commercial-heavy American sports.

    I remember seeing the World Cup on American TV a decade ago or so when they would shrink the games down to a tiny rectangle every so often and show ads around it, or something like that. The football fans I was watching with were really annoyed by how the US was showing the matches. I don’t think they did that again.

  270. 270.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:20 pm

    If this game goes to PKs I’ll be disappointed. If it goes to PKs and Pique doesn’t take one, I’ll be extra disappointed.

  271. 271.

    jeffreyw

    July 11, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    @Randinho: help! i’m spam locked!

  272. 272.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    @mattt: Usually you can tell, the referee will allow an attack to continue but when it is cleared and the stoppage time is over he’ll blow the whistle. I kind of wish they would standardize that, maybe say that once the time is expired the defending team has to clear the ball to half or something like that. So far in this tournament the refs have blown the whistle pretty much dead on the end of the stoppage time minutes.

  273. 273.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 11, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    Nine yellow cards, some of which should have been reds — a record for the World Cup final. Scoreless going into extra time. The football gods would not listen to me and offer us a goal. This has been a match that football fans will want to forget, no matter who wins.

  274. 274.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    @Leeds man:
    Heh. Well, that and the fact that part of the game involves beating up on the other players.

  275. 275.

    scarshapedstar

    July 11, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    Team Holland!

  276. 276.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    Does Torres need to be on the field to take PKs? I assume one of Spain’s top strikers is a good PK man….if we don’t see him in extra time he must really be in the doghouse.

  277. 277.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    Man, I think this is going to PKs. Even though Spain is leading in possession 95%-5%, the Dutch have had the better shots.

  278. 278.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    Yeah, I love that about watching this World Cup. The game isn’t interrupted by stupid commercials. And there’s no fake timeout like a “two minute warning” or “commercial time out” just to show TV ads. It’s a nice change from the usual commercial-heavy American sports.

    Abso-fragging-lutely. I’ve been so glad of this. ESPN3 and now Univision are making me happy. It’s the game the way it should be watched, not the way the ad buyers want it watched.

  279. 279.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    @Amir_Khalid:
    It’s not been an exciting game.

  280. 280.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    @Violet: I remember that, and the next tournament they put a sponsor’s logo up next to the score, and not small either it took up the entire top of the screen. ESPN/ABC have clearly caught a clue finally, this coverage has been great.

  281. 281.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    Jo’burg is almost 5,000 feet above sea level, so conditioning will be even a larger factor in OT.

  282. 282.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    @mattt: Yes, he does.

  283. 283.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    Good no-call.

  284. 284.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    Robben swings his arms like a robot when he turns on his jets. He’s pretty fast but he looks like that spaz on the playground (which was me by the way).

    If Fabregas didn’t dive there the ref may have been more sympathetic.

  285. 285.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    July 11, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    @Lysana: In addition pretty much everything on TV in Europe, well in France anyway, is like that. A whole movie, then commercials all at the end.

    The classic US response is “Well it’s nice of course, but how can they survive like that?”

    The classic French response when seeing US TV on the other hand is “Well, it’s profitable, but how can you watch anything like that?”

  286. 286.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    Dive, Spain, dive!

  287. 287.

    cmorenc

    July 11, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    @Matt

    Did I hear the announcers right? If Robben goes down after Puyol’s attempted trip, which clearly impeded him, he gets a free/penalty kick (not sure the term), but by staying up he gets nothing? No wonder they dive.

    Nothing in the rules makes this distinction (Robbin goes down = foul, Robbin stays up not), rather in this sort of situation it’s a matter of lack of available referee angles to see the foul and whether it has sufficient effect on play clearly enough to call it if Robben stays up. And no, because the foul took place outside the penalty area, it will NOT result in a “penalty kick” from the mark (with no immediate opponent but the goalkeeper), but rather a free kick from the spot of the foul. But it would result in a red card (send off) for the perp (Spanish defender Puyol) because he was the “last defender” (other than the goalkeeper) and the Dutch attacker with the breakaway (Robben) had an “obvious goal scoring opportunity”.

  288. 288.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    Hmm… I saw 3 dives…

  289. 289.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    No one can finish!

  290. 290.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    @Bootlegger:
    Yeah, I have enjoyed the ESPN/ABC coverage, although for some reason the ESPN audio was seriously better on my TV than the ABC audio. I don’t know if the feeds were different or something, but I’d watch ESPN during the week and then a weekend match would be on ABC and the vuvuzelas would be up so loud you couldn’t even hear the announcers.

    Sheesh, another shot and miss by Spain. Crazy.

  291. 291.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    Nice save by Steckelenberg, but the attack was sprung by an uncalled foul.

  292. 292.

    eric

    July 11, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    The Dutch might want to mark Puyol on the set pieces.

  293. 293.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    I really like to watch those defenders like Bronkhorst and Piquet who always seem to be in the right place to break up plays without kicking anybody in the shin.

  294. 294.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    This game will probably end 1:0…. after the shootout..

  295. 295.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    @Bootlegger:

    I’ve often thought that despite his speed and skill, he has no physical grace. Like a chicken on steroids.

  296. 296.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:35 pm

    Smart move getting rid of de Jong.

  297. 297.

    SRW1

    July 11, 2010 at 4:35 pm

    @Therese:

    How many WC finals have been decided by a shoot out?

    Two:

    USA 1994: Brazil -Italy = 3:2
    Germany 2006: Italy – France = 5:3

  298. 298.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    Nooooooooooo!!!!!! We lost the satellite!!!!!!!

  299. 299.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    Soooooooooo close

  300. 300.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    Who was that Spanish player who just made that shot at the goal? His eyes are gorgeous.

  301. 301.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    @Leeds man: That would explain the missing feathers…I mean hair.

  302. 302.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal:
    Oh no! Terrible timing.

  303. 303.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    Thanks cmorenc for the quick explanation!

  304. 304.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    @Violet: Jesus Navas

  305. 305.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:39 pm

    @Randinho: Yep, he was certainly an ejection risk.

  306. 306.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    It’s back.

  307. 307.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    @Bootlegger: Comity! :-)

  308. 308.

    Mary G

    July 11, 2010 at 4:41 pm

    O/T but the clock question got me thinking about why the British drive on the left side of the road and I found out during the commercials at this placethat it stems from the middle ages and they refuse to change it.

  309. 309.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    @Randinho: And comedy ;-0

  310. 310.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    @Randinho:
    Thank you. I will go do a google image search. Those eyes…

    Sorry. Back to football.

  311. 311.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    Ugh. This is why I’m not a “real” sports fan. It’s so freaking stressful. I don’t even have a horse in this race and I’m having a heart attack.

  312. 312.

    SRW1

    July 11, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    And after Villa goes off, the last two candidates standing for the Golden boot: Wesley Sneijder and Thomas Mueller. With Mueller ahead because of his three assists.

  313. 313.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    Best header of the tournament

  314. 314.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    @Mary G:

    They’ll change when America goes metric.

  315. 315.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    Its amazing these guys are still pressing all over the field. I don’t think either of them wants PKs.

  316. 316.

    Darcy

    July 11, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    @SRW1: Don’t forget Diego Forlan, although Mueller would be ahead with assists there too.

  317. 317.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 11, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    @mattt: If it goes to penalties after extra time, you have to still be on the pitch to be eligible to take a kick. Also, if the keeper parries the ball away, the ball is then dead; the kicker cannot attack the rebound, as he would be allowed to during regular play.

  318. 318.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    Heitinga goes off. That was inevitable, I suppose.

  319. 319.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    A red card!

  320. 320.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    Here’s a chance.

    ETA: And goes wanting.

  321. 321.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    Whoa. Red card.

  322. 322.

    frankdawg

    July 11, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    I hate when championship games get decided by some bullshit set piece. College football has the best of a bad set of options in that at least each tam gets the ball.

    Hockey & its stupid shootouts, soccer & its PKs. NFL and its coin toss. How about a punt, pass and kick competition? How about after 9 innings the switch to a home run derby?

  323. 323.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    No complaint about that one, but the first yellow against Heitinga was bullshit.

  324. 324.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    Whew

  325. 325.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    I’m surprised the Dutch lasted that long before giving up the man. Heitinga was a little unfortunate there, he definitely put a hand on Iniesta but he didn’t pull him down, that was all the Spaniard’s sales job.

  326. 326.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    Hey, Spain? Love you this game, but the goal is LOWER than that.

  327. 327.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 4:50 pm

    Two yellows. Bound to happen.

  328. 328.

    folkbum

    July 11, 2010 at 4:50 pm

    With the Dutch a man down, if it’s tied after ten kicks per side (assuming it’s tied after five and they have to keep going), do the Spanish get the 11th and the Dutch don’t?

  329. 329.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    @frankdawg: +1, it is by far the lamest thing about tournament football.

  330. 330.

    SRW1

    July 11, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    @Darcy:

    Golden boot is for the best scorer. There are four candidates with five goals: Villa, Sneijder, Forlan and Mueller. Since Sneijder is the only one who can still score, it is between him and Mueller, who leads by virtue of his three assists (all others have only one).

  331. 331.

    Bill Murray

    July 11, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    @folkbum: No, they just restart the same rotation for the Dutch

  332. 332.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 11, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    At last! A red card! Yay!

  333. 333.

    folkbum

    July 11, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    @Bill Murray: Thanks.

  334. 334.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    @folkbum:

    Doesn’t matter. Each team gets 5 shots

  335. 335.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    Uh-oh, this is a good chance for the Dutch here.

  336. 336.

    Bill Murray

    July 11, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    @TR: but if tied after 5 it goes until there is a difference — I was in a shootout once that went to 23 kickers

  337. 337.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    @TR: But if it is tied after that the rest of the team shoots. We looked up the record yesterday, 42 penalties in an FA Cup game.

  338. 338.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Why was that a goal kick? The ball bounced of the shoulder of one of the guys on the wall.

  339. 339.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Heartbreaker there.

  340. 340.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    WOW!

  341. 341.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Shit. We lost the signal here. FUUUUUUUUCK.

  342. 342.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Gooooooooooooallllllllll!

  343. 343.

    Darcy

    July 11, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    @SRW1: Gotcha. Withdrawn:)

  344. 344.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    YEAAAAAHHHH! GOOOOOOOOL!

  345. 345.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Fuck. Fuck. Fuck. Fuckity. Fuck

  346. 346.

    Bill Murray

    July 11, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Sure looked off, but no replay yet.

    clearly not offside,

  347. 347.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Finally… the Dutch had 4 touches on the ball during this whole attack, yet they couldn’t defuse the situation.

  348. 348.

    shirk

    July 11, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Iniesta *finally* shoots! Guess that’s the one he was waiting for…

  349. 349.

    LivingInWingnutHell

    July 11, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Stupid octupus.

  350. 350.

    Mary G

    July 11, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    This is grueling; does either team want to win? OK, just as I typed that they score. Yay Spain!

  351. 351.

    SRW1

    July 11, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    And Iniesta thereby probably secured best player of the tournament.

  352. 352.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 11, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    With seven players booked and one sent off, the Dutch might well be facing some kind of post-tournament sanction from FIFA.

  353. 353.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Very nice goal. Good for Spain!

  354. 354.

    frankdawg

    July 11, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    well at least we should avoid PKs but this game does not make me excited about soccer.

  355. 355.

    folkbum

    July 11, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    So was the octopus perfect this world cup?

  356. 356.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    It was clearly onside but the Dutch are pissed they didn’t get the call on the other end.

  357. 357.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    @folkbum: Don’t know, but I doubt it.

    Robben should have gotten a yellow for kicking the ball into the net and Holland should have gotten a corner.

    Mathijsen looks like a fool. Iniesta was at least a yard onside.

  358. 358.

    Nethead Jay

    July 11, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    Well, the judge finally managed to give it to Spain. Fuck them to hell and back.

  359. 359.

    frankdawg

    July 11, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    @folkbum:

    unless the impossible happens, yes

  360. 360.

    Bill Murray

    July 11, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    I’d still like to see a replay of the Elia non-obstruction that led to the goal, but Webb lost control a long time ago

  361. 361.

    Wordsmith

    July 11, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    @folkbum: Thus far…yep; no octopus has EVER done me wrong. Or is it Octopi?

  362. 362.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    Yeah!!!!

    (So glad I’m not the ref of this game. Jeez.)

  363. 363.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    Now you will see some world-class time-wasting.

  364. 364.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    @folkbum:

    So was the octopus perfect this world cup?

    Unless the Netherlands pulls it off, yes. We’re not quite done with extra time yet. bites her nails

  365. 365.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    @folkbum: Yes, if Spain win, 8 for 8, I believe.

  366. 366.

    folkbum

    July 11, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    @Randinho: I think he nailed all of Germany’s games, including the 3rd place match. And he called it for Spain today.

    I didn’t hear if they asked him about the non-German games before this one, though.

  367. 367.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    So why did the Spanish get a goal kick after Sneijder’s free kick? How the ref could have missed that it went off a Spanish player eludes me, since it deflected about 45 degrees.

  368. 368.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 5:01 pm

    There are dead people on the field!

  369. 369.

    You Don't Say

    July 11, 2010 at 5:01 pm

    Hey, Randinho, thanks for your hospitality and expertise during the tournament.

  370. 370.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    Good to see Torres could get on in time to hurt himself again.

  371. 371.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    Direct TV, you suck.

  372. 372.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    Well done, Spain!

  373. 373.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    Bummer.

  374. 374.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    Dammit

    I think it’s safe to say that Webb did not have a good game, though the teams made it tough on him. Who it benefited in the end isn’t at all clear to me.

  375. 375.

    frankdawg

    July 11, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    well – there are 3 hours of my life I’ll never get back. I only got to see maybe 6 full games & parts of a few others & this was the worst of the bunch

  376. 376.

    Joel

    July 11, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    Awesome game, really just awesome. A few major missed calls, but big redemption for Iniesta, who blew some great chances (was leaning towards “Miniesta” myself).

  377. 377.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    @You Don’t Say:

    Hey, Randinho, thanks for your hospitality and expertise during the tournament.

    Agreed. These threads have been fantastic.

  378. 378.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    Spain played well, they deserve it. Not that the Dutch didn’t, but Spain won the game. They won the tournament scoring only 7 goals, amazing.

  379. 379.

    shirk

    July 11, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    @Wordsmith: Octopuses, or octopodes if you want to be pedantic. The “-pus” ending derives from Greek, not Latin.

  380. 380.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 5:05 pm

    @Lysana: +1

  381. 381.

    frankdawg

    July 11, 2010 at 5:05 pm

    Thanks to Randinho and to all of you who helped develop my interest in the World Cup – it wsa fun lets do it again in 4 years!

  382. 382.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 5:05 pm

    @You Don’t Say: Thank you all for the kind words.

  383. 383.

    Violet

    July 11, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    @You Don’t Say:

    Hey, Randinho, thanks for your hospitality and expertise during the tournament.

    Yes, thank you! It’s been great hanging out here during the World Cup and I learned a lot about futbol as well. Thanks.

  384. 384.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    Huh. I guess I have very different tastes than most people, because I thought this was a very exciting game to watch. There were a lot of fouls, and no scoring for 116 minutes, but the play went up and down and there were plenty of scoring chances. Even though the wrong team won, I enjoyed it.

  385. 385.

    folkbum

    July 11, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    @Randinho: It’s been great. Thank you.

  386. 386.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: I don’t think either got the better of it. Both team played physical and both teams dove and the missed calls went both ways.

  387. 387.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    I don’t know how to feel about this game in the end. It was …interesting… though. Also thanks from me to Randinho for these threads.

  388. 388.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    @frankdawg: Why wait that long? How about the Copa America next year and the Euro 2012 championship, or the Women’s WC next year?

  389. 389.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    @frankdawg:

    lets do it again in 4 years!

    How about next year? Women’s World Cup!

  390. 390.

    shirk

    July 11, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    What the others said. Randinho, many thanks for hosting these threads and for providing your commentary. Although I’ve been lurking until the last few, I’ve been reading them all and really appreciate your insight.

  391. 391.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    Ditto on enjoying the threads. We should do this more often; I wish we’d had the same thing during the Olympic ice hockey.

  392. 392.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    @Nethead Jay:

    Well, the judge finally managed to give it to Spain.

    And nobody’s gonna Torquemada it.

  393. 393.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: I agree, I enjoyed the game though I really, really wish they’d do something about the diving. A good physical game and lots of demonstrated skill but too much farce on both sides.

  394. 394.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 5:11 pm

    @Lysana:

    No Diego Forlan, no Andy K on those threads.

    ; )

  395. 395.

    Cat Lady

    July 11, 2010 at 5:12 pm

    @Randinho:

    Co-sign. You made me sound like I knew what I was talking about with some friends. I do really hate all the flopping, though. If I wanted to watch that, I’d be a bigger NBA fan. I’m looking at you Ginobili.

  396. 396.

    Bootlegger

    July 11, 2010 at 5:12 pm

    @Randinho: Probably only the women’s WC will be available to most of the US market (on TV).

  397. 397.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 5:13 pm

    Great job, Randinho! Thanks to you, Cole and everyone who commented here during the tournament.

  398. 398.

    Turgid Jacobian

    July 11, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    @Randinho: C’mon you chauvinist! Gold Cup coming next year, too!

  399. 399.

    Lysana

    July 11, 2010 at 5:15 pm

    @Andy K:

    No Diego Forlan, no Andy K on those threads.

    But will the Cup have Forlan in four years? Semi-serious question. :)

  400. 400.

    Cacti

    July 11, 2010 at 5:15 pm

    I had no one to cheer for in this Final match.

    I’m not really happy that Spain won, but OTOH, I’m a little happy the dirty Dutch lost the way they did. Down a man after a Red Card send-off.

  401. 401.

    TR

    July 11, 2010 at 5:15 pm

    @Andy K:

    Direct TV, you suck.

    What do you mean? I’m watching on DTV and no problems.

    That said, they can suck royally. I’m just not sure specifically how they’re sucking now.

  402. 402.

    mcd410x

    July 11, 2010 at 5:16 pm

    Glad Cesc got the assist on the winner. Going to miss seeing that lad when he leaves.

  403. 403.

    cmorenc

    July 11, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    Well done Randinho, thanks for hosting the WC threads! Thanks to John Cole for having Ranhinho at BJ to create and comment during these threads!

  404. 404.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    @Lysana:

    At that point I’ll be over him.

  405. 405.

    MikeJ

    July 11, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    Africa conquered Spain in 711CE and Spain finally gets around to returning the favour.

  406. 406.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    @Bootlegger: Copa America is always on Univision here in the US. If the USMNT gets invited (two teams from CONCACAF always go to round out the groups as CONMEBOL only has ten countries), I could see FSC covering it. ESPN carried Euro 2008 here in the USA

  407. 407.

    mattt

    July 11, 2010 at 5:21 pm

    Well, as the announcers are saying at least the best team won!

    Thanks to all here for the education, and for making the final more enjoyable.

    See you in 4 years!

  408. 408.

    Turgid Jacobian

    July 11, 2010 at 5:24 pm

    @Randinho: Yeah, but our coach sent a “B” team to the last one we were invited to. There’s got to be a chance we get snubbed next go ’round. (We=USA)

  409. 409.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 5:24 pm

    @TR:

    We lost the game here. I think it might actually be the local ABC affiliate’s fault, since the tv in the bar that wasn’t tuned to the game was working just fine, thank you very much.

    Whatever happened, we lost the signal about a minute before Iniesta scored. We got back some pixilating signal long enough to see that Spain had scored. Only the two guys sitting with me- and myself, of course- knew he’d scored, because I’ve had the Gamecast up on another tab all afternoon.

  410. 410.

    Nethead Jay

    July 11, 2010 at 5:25 pm

    @Leeds man: I hate Spain with the heat of a thousand suns. And this ref has now fucked up 2 games recently. As far as I’m concerned, they can go DIAF…

  411. 411.

    SRW1

    July 11, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    Randinho, thanks for sheparding these threads during the tournament.

    See you at the Women’s WC 2011 in Germany. (Final: Germany – USA)

  412. 412.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 5:27 pm

    2011 Gold Cup winner represents CONCACAF at the 2013 Confed Cup. Prevailing wisdom is that participation in the Confed Cup last year really helped the US prepare for this year’s World Cup, so expect us to marshal all of our best players for it.

  413. 413.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 5:30 pm

    @SRW1:

    There has already been one huge shock in qualifying: China is out.

  414. 414.

    JGabriel

    July 11, 2010 at 5:31 pm

    This is it! Who takes home the trophy?

    Spain, apparently.

    Time for a new thread?

    .

  415. 415.

    Turgid Jacobian

    July 11, 2010 at 5:31 pm

    @burnspbesq: Absolutely, especially with a new coach. Possibly. Unlike many others, I’m not against Bob Bradley-I just don’t think that two cycles with one coach is a great idea. Staleness innit?

  416. 416.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    There has already been one huge shock in qualifying: China is out.

    This tournament is getting better already.

  417. 417.

    Polly

    July 11, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    Randinho, what is “sarcastic walking”? One sportscaster refered to this in extra play time.

    Thanks for all your posts, I’ve learned a lot from you.

  418. 418.

    Georgia Pig

    July 11, 2010 at 5:35 pm

    Best team won. Netherlands has some great players (Robben), but the Dutch defenders, like von Bommel and De Jong, are thugs. Like a freaking hockey game at times, lots of holding and checking. The Spanish started to mix it up in the second half, but the Dutch bear the blame for most of the rough play.

    Shitty way to play a final, the game yesterday was far better. They need to rethink the rules on fouls because they tend to be either too lenient or too draconian and warp big games. Maybe throw guys out for a borderline red card foul and force a sub so that the other team doesn’t get a man advantage until you run out of subs. Then, maybe the ref could have thrown Von Bommel or DeJong out early for some of their more egregious plays without ruining the game by making the Dutch play the whole game a man down. Either that or some kind of penalty box, one man down for five minutes.

  419. 419.

    Alex S.

    July 11, 2010 at 5:35 pm

    @MikeJ:

    Wasn’t that revenge for the Visigoths though?

  420. 420.

    Turgid Jacobian

    July 11, 2010 at 5:36 pm

    @Polly: a player was pacing off 10 yds for a free kick. Ref might do this, might just go to 10 yds (he’s had a bit of practice at figuring the distance). Having a player do it is a slap at the ref… probably not a good idear if you don’t want to get a card.

  421. 421.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 5:37 pm

    @Turgid Jacobian: Not so. The B team went to the CONCACAF Gold Cup in 2009, which occurred right after the Confederations Cup last year, hence the B team being sent.

    The last Copa America was in 2007.

  422. 422.

    Royston Vasey

    July 11, 2010 at 5:39 pm

    interesting thought…..New Zealand were the only team at the World Cup NOT to lose!

    Yay the All Whites!

  423. 423.

    Turgid Jacobian

    July 11, 2010 at 5:39 pm

    @Randinho: I am referring to the 2007 Copa America. http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=443456&cc=5901

    ETA: I can see how it might seem I was referring to sending a B team to the last Gold Cup. That is true, too, but we don’t have to be invited to the Gold Cup.

  424. 424.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    @Turgid Jacobian: My bad. I’d forgotten about that.

  425. 425.

    LosGatosCA

    July 11, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    And that’s why America will never embrace this sport.

    It’s basically unwatchable.

    The skill to opportunity level is just not high enough.

    A one man advantage and a free kick from 25 yards – gets air mailed right over the net.

    The sport is desparately in need of a Paul Brown to re-organize it for success.

    And the officiating and flopping put it on par with the Olympics for a satisfying spectator experience. Just add a Russian judge and it’s complete.

  426. 426.

    wufnik

    July 11, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    in some ways, this was a match made in heaven.The Dutch play a very aggressive game (or you can say they play like thugs), and the Spanish have refined the art of t he dive from the Italians. Perfect!

  427. 427.

    Mark S.

    July 11, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    When do they announce who won the Golden Ball?

  428. 428.

    Paula

    July 11, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    Argh. Curse of the inaccurate shots there. But FUCK YES the best team won.

  429. 429.

    Dr. Squid

    July 11, 2010 at 5:57 pm

    Spain deserved it. Nifty little goal by Iniesta. Of course that was after his dive that drew Heitinga’s second yellow and sendoff, but it’s not like it was so egregious that there’s no way it couldn’t have been a card.

    Listening to the first half in the car, all the flying cards were described as richly deserved, and a few should’ve been straight red. Sounds like the English guy called a proper game.

  430. 430.

    Comrade Kevin

    July 11, 2010 at 5:59 pm

    @LosGatosCA: ZZZZZZZZZ

  431. 431.

    demo woman

    July 11, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    Randinho thank you for hosting the site during the World Cups. The games were exciting and I did learn about the sport. I still wanted Spain to win because let’s face it, they do have some eye candy playing for them.

  432. 432.

    Cacti

    July 11, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    @LosGatosCA: @<a

    And carrying and throwing it with your hands. And each goal should be worth 6 points. And it needs more 350 lbs lard bodies bashing into each other.

    That's the mark of teh rea1 football.

  433. 433.

    Calouste

    July 11, 2010 at 6:07 pm

    Webb 1 – Holland 0.

    This has been the last soccer match I will ever watch. 5 minutes into the second half it was obvious the fix was in.

  434. 434.

    Cacti

    July 11, 2010 at 6:08 pm

    From a political standpoint, it’s rather just and fitting that the Dutch should lose on South African soil.

  435. 435.

    Joe

    July 11, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    Golden Ball for player of the tournament went to Diego Forlan.

    Golden Boot for top goalscorer goes to Thomas Muller on an assist tiebreaker. i.e. 5 goals and 3 assists broke the tie with Villa, Forlan etc.

  436. 436.

    Joe

    July 11, 2010 at 6:13 pm

    @Calouste: Maybe he was trying to make up for the fact that he hadn’t sent off the Van Bommell and De Jong in the first half. Over the whole match the idea that Webb “cost” Holland the match is ridiculous.

    Holland finished the match with 10 men, but it should have been 8 or 9 (and I’m not even counting the guy who DID get sent off as I thought his 2nd yellow was harsh). The better team won.

  437. 437.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 6:21 pm

    @Joe: Amen.

  438. 438.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 6:24 pm

    @Calouste:

    It wasn’t so obvious when Robben broke in on Casillas only to see the keeper get just enough of the shot to prevent the go-ahead Dutch goal.

    This was an….interesting game. The Dutch were willing to take cards and relinquish set pieces in order to force the flow of the game to their liking. Had the fix been in, they would have been playing at least a man down for at least an hour.

  439. 439.

    JenJen

    July 11, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    @Joe: I think Forlan is an excellent choice for Golden Ball.

    Woooohoooo España!!

    JenJen, home from the match, +lost count

  440. 440.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 6:31 pm

    @Andy K:

    “when Robben broke in on Casillas only to see the keeper get just enough of the shot to prevent the go-ahead Dutch goal.”

    and Robben was wearing Puyol like a sweater on a warm day, i.e., loosely tied around his shoulders.

  441. 441.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 6:37 pm

    For all the times Robben dove during the tournament, the one time he was actually being fouled in a situation that absolutely would have gotten the guilty party sent off if he’d made a meal of it, he stays on his feet and ends up with nothing to show for it.

    Karma.

  442. 442.

    burnspbesq

    July 11, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    Hate to say it, because I was rooting for them, but the Dutch in this tournament were Butler – just not quite good enough when it mattered most, and therefore one big play short of getting it done.

  443. 443.

    LosGatosCA

    July 11, 2010 at 6:51 pm

    @Cacti:

    Unfortunately, you completely miss my point.

    25 yard free kick and a 1 man advantage.

    Try playing professional American football or baseball or basketball one man short for an extended period of time. The team with the advantage will carve up the other team methodically.

    The fact that soccer teams cannot exploit that type of advantage in a set piece play 90%+ of the time tells me that the game’s strategy is only fulfilling to the participants.

    Inestia blows two chances inside the penalty box because he can’t use his left foot? And he’s a world class scorer on the world championship team in his sport?

    Sorry, that’s just laughable.

  444. 444.

    stuckinred

    July 11, 2010 at 6:56 pm

    @LosGatosCA: so don’t watch it.

  445. 445.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    @Calouste:

    What part of “the best team won” eludes you?

  446. 446.

    Andy K

    July 11, 2010 at 6:58 pm

    @LosGatosCA:

    What’s your point? That they should have brought every player forward into the wall, leaving only the guy taking the free kick between any opposing player who might control a ball into the wall?

    Dude, that’s just stupid unless the team was down a goal in added time. For the same reason you leave a defenseman or two back on a faceoff in hockey even playing a man up- you don’t want to give up the shorthanded goal. Jebus. Use your fricking head.

    As for Iniesta’s inability to go left….How many home runs did Ruth hit from the right side of the plate in WS games?

  447. 447.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 6:59 pm

    @LosGatosCA:

    If only most of the world could read your analysis. Boy would they feel silly for loving the sport all these years. Stoopid furners.

  448. 448.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 7:11 pm

    @LosGatosCA:

    Sorry, that’s just laughable.

    Yeah, and left-right dominance plays no role in golf, tennis, baseball, basketball, football or hockey.

  449. 449.

    Calouste

    July 11, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    @Andy K:

    they would have been playing at least a man down for at least an hour.

    Well, they were. Spain had 12 men on the field starting at half time.

    And of course “the fix is in” means that the ref is going to let thing fall Spain’s way, not going to make blatant calls in their favor, well, not at least until he worked out they were not going to score on their own (not with Villa not able to hit the ball within 5 meters of the post, man, he had a bad game) and he gave a second yellow for a blatant dive and didn’t give the Dutch a corner. If Robben would have scored that goal, Spain would have gotten an equalizer somehow or another.

  450. 450.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 7:16 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    and Robben was wearing Puyol like a sweater on a warm day, i.e., loosely tied around his shoulders.

    And it’s worth noting that Puyol had already been booked, so Webb wouldn’t even have needed to think that it deserved a straight red card for him to get sent off. As I said at the time it happened, if that’s typical of the way that refs call fouls, then I need to reappraise my view on the baseness of diving; if it’s the only way to get legitimate fouls called, then of course you’re going to see it a lot.

    Soccer has some serious officiating problems. As I said in a different thread, it’s not even that I think that they are necessarily bad at it. It’s just that refereeing a high level soccer match is not humanly possible. There’s too much happening and the distances involved are too great. I know the rest of the world disagrees with me, but it’s a joke. Hockey finally broke down and added a second ref. Soccer probably needs to do the same.

  451. 451.

    ChrisB

    July 11, 2010 at 7:26 pm

    @Andy K:

    As for Iniesta’s inability to go left….How many home runs did Ruth hit from the right side of the plate in WS games?

    How many times was the ball pitched to the right of Ruth’s body instead of the left?

    @LosGatosCA:

    Try playing professional American football or baseball or basketball one man short for an extended period of time. The team with the advantage will carve up the other team methodically.

    So what would you want, teams playing a man or two down for limited periods of time as in hockey or lacrosse (perhaps with misconduct penalties that prevent specific players from returning)?

  452. 452.

    Turgid Jacobian

    July 11, 2010 at 7:27 pm

    @Calouste: Yep, those two blown corners really turned the tide. Frankly the second yellow was late coming for the Ned defender. Neds was about two strait red cards short of what they deserved. Or did you think that De Jong should have gotten a point for that magnificient jump-kick to Alonso’s chest (the one that missed the ball by more than two feet)?

  453. 453.

    LosGatosCA

    July 11, 2010 at 7:35 pm

    @Leeds man:

    Who said they were stupid?

    My point is simply that the scientific method hasn’t been applied to soccer the way it has been to other sports. The strategies, the player selection and positioning all shout it out.

    Even that play by Stecklenberg in goal on the shot from Fabregas in the 100th minute. He stays in the net, doesn’t come out to cut off the angle, then when the shot is taken he gives up his position in the highest percentage placement for the shot to fall to the ground to his right where he can’t block anything anyway.

    He gave up his best possible position for no advantage after his poor reaction to the situation.

    Luckily, the shot went slightly wide so that they didn’t lose on a total embarrassment.

    Hockey goalies give up unscreened slap shots from the blue line all the time. But not in the 7th game of the Stanley Cup finals by leaving the net open.

    There are too many unforced mental errors in soccer, that speaks to substandard coaching, strategies, and preparation.

  454. 454.

    Morbo

    July 11, 2010 at 7:38 pm

    Congratulations, Spain, for granting victory for those who assert that soccer is boring.

  455. 455.

    Morbo

    July 11, 2010 at 7:44 pm

    @Joe: Forlan with the golden ball, good, very well deserved.

  456. 456.

    Leeds man

    July 11, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    @LosGatosCA:

    I’m not sure what your goal is here, but there is always the option of not watching it, or playing it. Maybe set up a soap box on the Appalachian Trail and rail against the idiocy of hiking.

  457. 457.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 7:50 pm

    @Calouste: And he let a thug get off with a yellow for a karate kick and didn’t book Van Persie for kicking the ball into the net long after the whistle had been blown (which is a bookable offense) and would have resulted in a sending off or Arjen Robben for doing the same.

    The Dutch have no business complaining; neither do their fans.

  458. 458.

    Tancrudo

    July 11, 2010 at 7:55 pm

    @Joe:

    I’m not sure the better team won. If the Dutch had tried to play soccer instead of sock him they might have had a good chance. Besides their obvious brawling skills, some of them are really good soccer players too.

    But the Dutch should be content with their special place in the record books:

    -Dirtiest side in a world cup final

    It’s the record they deserve. Take it home, van Marwijk. It’s your result.

  459. 459.

    LosGatosCA

    July 11, 2010 at 7:56 pm

    @ChrisB: @ChrisB:

    You’d have to fix the officiating problem in soccer, which is also huge, first.

    But, assuming you could get fair officiating at the level of baseball without replays, I’d say game misconducts and timed penalties would certainly help focus the strategy to exploit a predictable opportunity.

    I’d immediately remove the suspension penalty for the following game for the game misconduct as well. Make the penalty and the consequences more immediate for the game underway while making subsequent matches themselves fairer by having all players available. Why have the team in the tomorrow’s game benefit from fouls committed in today’s contest?

    It makes sense to the people who play under the existing rules, but the reality is that the sport could be massively improved very quickly – in terms of strategy and productivity. I think the natural consequence of improving the strategy would the development of greater skill (or better player skill selection) to counteract it.

    As for the dirty players, not only could they cost their team in real time but you can still have a higher threshhold for a game suspension like other professional sports have – nothing prevents that.

  460. 460.

    Therese

    July 11, 2010 at 7:57 pm

    @JenJen: did you go to Molly Malone’s? How was it?

  461. 461.

    Mike E

    July 11, 2010 at 8:01 pm

    What a brutal, brutal Final. The Dutch went all Hanson brothers because they knew the Spaniards were just too dominant. As much as I tried to root for the Oranje, Robben’s bitchy prima donna act and the various spike-punches to the neck made me glad that España finally broke through. Congrats.

  462. 462.

    Tancrudo

    July 11, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: Dude, there are three referees already – one principal and two assistants. How many do you want?

  463. 463.

    Turgid Jacobian

    July 11, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    @LosGatosCA: Two things:

    My point is simply that the scientific method hasn’t been applied to soccer the way it has been to other sports. The strategies, the player selection and positioning all shout it out.

    1) the amount of money in top-flight soccer suggests otherwise

    There are too many unforced mental errors in soccer, that speaks to substandard coaching, strategies, and preparation.

    2) Some folks called about substandard performances in championships. You may want to get back to them: Bill Buckner. Ray Allen. Rich Gannon. Roger Staubach. Martin Brodeur. Patrik Stefan.

  464. 464.

    flukebucket

    July 11, 2010 at 8:05 pm

    Damn late to this thread but didn’t want it to get by without first expressing my sincere appreciation to you Randinho for the time and effort you put into this. It was one hell of a lot of fun.

    And thank you John Cole for giving him the keys and letting him drive. It was a damn good idea and now that it is over I feel more like a citizen of the world instead of just an American.

    For what it is worth I was pulling for Germany. Why I have no idea but that is where my heart was from the start.

    Already looking forward to the next one.

  465. 465.

    Alan in SF

    July 11, 2010 at 8:05 pm

    @Bootlegger:

    they drop, but they don’t roll and grimace so much

  466. 466.

    The Gimp

    July 11, 2010 at 8:07 pm

    LosGatosCA:

    It’s not a lack of coaching, strategy or anything like that.

    It’s the fact that these athletes – the most physically fit in all of sports – play virtually non-stop for ninety fucking minutes.

    Let’s see a 300lb lineman, Payton Manning, A-Rod or LeBron do 90 minutes without a real break.

    Soccer is a ridiculously difficult game to play, with constant running on a huge field.

    Yes, they need to do something about the officiating, but complaining that there are too many mental errors and why can’t he use both feet equally well is just plain ignorant.

  467. 467.

    Paula

    July 11, 2010 at 8:21 pm

    This thread went to potty in a hurry …

    Oi. I have no idea why van Bommel was still in this match after the half.

    As for Spain, does it seem to anyone else that what people were saying in regards to their tactical inflexibility was somewhat true? Took them a bit of time to respond to the Dutch gunning-and-running around them. Or maybe that’s just what happens when you have 2 very incompatible styles of play.

  468. 468.

    JenJen

    July 11, 2010 at 8:23 pm

    @Therese: Went to Old Saloon in Kenwood, actually. Fun, pro-España crowd. Had a blast!!

    I’m sure Molly’s was rockin’ too, but not the way it was for the USA or GER matches.

    Sigh. I miss World Cup already. Look forward to feeding my addiction again in August!

    ETA: Catching up on the thread, it’s a shame to see it descended into the usual soccer-hata crap. And on the day of the World Cup Final! There oughta be a law…

  469. 469.

    Randinho

    July 11, 2010 at 8:24 pm

    eastriver,

    Just deleted your troll comment again. Whether you’re in Massachusetts or NYC, you come to bait me and you’ll be deleted.

    Grow up.

  470. 470.

    Paula

    July 11, 2010 at 8:40 pm

    Oh, yes: Forlan’s Golden Ball is well deserved, indeed. :)

  471. 471.

    cmorenc

    July 11, 2010 at 8:42 pm

    @LosGatosCa

    And that’s why America will never embrace this sport. It’s basically unwatchable.

    700 million people around the globe who watched today’s final with rapt interest would vehemently disagree with your “unwatchable” judgment, that is if they gave a fig what you think about the world’s most popular sport by an immense margin. You would get lots of agreement that today’s game fell short in many respects of being as pleasing as it should have been, even that there’s aspects of the rules and the refereeing that could definitely stand to be tweaked for the better. What you would not get is very many among those 700 million who think the game is intrinsically broken or flawed, definitely not such that it needs a fundamental makeover to make it supposedly more pleasing to the tastes of the portion of American sports audiences who aren’t currently aficionados of the game.

    It’s the American so-called “football” that’s basically unwatchable to the tastes of the majority of folks outside the US (and many like me in the US). It consists of disjointed 10 second spurts of action that intermittently break up endless committee meetings among players, coaches, and officials, to say nothing of endless strings of commercials and time-outs. Basketball (a sport that’s more successfully transplanted to other cultures than American so-called “football”) also has an enormous amount of flopping and simulation and deliberate tactical hacking. Is it in need of fundamental makeover too for that reason?

    Frankly, the world doesn’t give a crap what Americans think of futbol, and that’s one of the smaller, but nonetheless sweeter aspects of its charm to the world.

  472. 472.

    cmorenc

    July 11, 2010 at 8:55 pm

    @Joe

    Golden Ball for player of the tournament went to Diego Forlan.

    Extremely well-deserved! If I was forming a soccer team and could choose from among ANY of the players on ANY of the 32 teams at WC 2010, Diego Forlan would be my very first choice – top class player, top class person. Of course, Messi would be my second choice, Mueller my third choice, and oh boy there would be tons of great choices for the rest.

    But Forlan would or should be in the starting eleven of each and every one of the 32 teams, were he of a different nationality.

  473. 473.

    PurpleGirl

    July 11, 2010 at 9:05 pm

    cmorenc @ 471: As I’ve written in any number of BJ comments, I am not a sports fan by any measure yet this afternoon I decided to watch the final World Cup game. I found it easy to watch and follow, even knowing nothing about the rules of play. The goal by Spain was incredible… I saw the kick and then wam! it went into the goal pen. It went by so fast, if you weren’t watching closely you might not have seen it. I’m glad I watched the game.

  474. 474.

    nice strategy

    July 11, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    @Bootlegger: We report, you decide
    (Objectivity is dead)a

    The Netherlands are a disgrace. Absolute rubbish.

  475. 475.

    Paula

    July 11, 2010 at 9:16 pm

    @PurpleGirl:

    I always think it’s kinda crazy when people complain about not “getting it” — what’s there to not get? Kick ball, pass ball, try to get ball in goal. Try not to kick people too hard. Don’t use your hands. Free kicks or cards when someone fouls.

    I get that depending on the skill set of the opposing teams this can turn into tedium, but that’s true of any sport.

    Any n00b can sit down in front of a match and see what the “point” is. I don’t think anyone can say that about, say, baseball or [handegg] football or golf, where there seems to be a baseline of info you need just to be able to read the action on the ground, let alone “get into it”.

    Basketball kinda trumps all in the obvious action department, though.

  476. 476.

    Tancrudo

    July 11, 2010 at 9:20 pm

    @cmorenc: Perhaps the problem is that soccer actually requires you to watch it. As you say, most of an American football game is really just milling about and hemming and hawing and doing silly dances. Then every few minutes they make sure you’re all ready to watch the ten seconds where they actually play the game.

    Perhaps that ten seconds exhausts the attention span of some, so that they need another commercial break or few minutes of fiddling about and lining up to relax their brains so they can be ready to watch another ten seconds. Baseball is the same – it’s three hours of standing about with brief interludes of something happening.

    A good soccer game, on the other hand, can be exhausting to watch because you can’t look away. The game hardly stops at all, and every touch on the ball could be important. For people with very short attention spans, this would be unwatchable. And for people with bladders of less than forty-five minute capacity.

  477. 477.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    July 11, 2010 at 10:08 pm

    @Tancrudo: I want there to be enough officials to have a chance of getting the calls right. I was told in another thread that the assistant refs don’t have the authority to call fouls. Fine, but the pitch is too damned big for one set of eyes and legs to be able to cover it all. It’s absolutely guaranteed that the ref is going to be too far from the play to make the right call a lot of the time. That’s a serious problem.

  478. 478.

    EDantes

    July 11, 2010 at 10:13 pm

    I had to DVR the game, so I’m really late. But I was amazed at what bad field sense the Dutch have, especially on defense. They got scored on dicking around with the ball near the net instead of just clearing it, which they were chronically doing all game. I don’t know how they got as far as they did. (And they were one of my teams!) Spain definitely deserved this one. It should have been 4-0.

  479. 479.

    Joe

    July 12, 2010 at 10:57 am

    @burnspbesq: I’d like to think Robben stayed on his feet through a sense of fair play, but going by his previous I doubt it. You can guarantee if that had been inside the penalty box he would have been down like he had been shot.

  480. 480.

    Jason

    July 12, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    @Paula: Yeah, I don’t know any other sport about which, in any discussion, you spend 50% of the time rationalizing its existence and the other 50% dealing with whining about “diving” or some other minor thing.

    The first thing I saw on British TV was cricket and it took me THREE DAYS just to figure out what the hell was happening. Then they were playing one match with a tree on the field. Not around the field, but on the field, and you got four runs if you hit it on the bounce. Ten years later there are still rules I don’t fully understand. Love the game, but I don’t act like it owes me an explanation.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Tony Jay on Monday Morning Open Thread: Murphy’s Rock (Mar 27, 2023 @ 11:56am)
  • UncleEbeneezer on Monday Morning Open Thread: Murphy’s Rock (Mar 27, 2023 @ 11:54am)
  • Steeplejack on Medium Cool – Agatha Christie & Dorothy Sayers, Part III (Mar 27, 2023 @ 11:54am)
  • Princess on What the Hell Is Happening In Israel? (Mar 27, 2023 @ 11:54am)
  • Chester on What the Hell Is Happening In Israel? (Mar 27, 2023 @ 11:53am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!