• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Not all heroes wear capes.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Second rate reporter says what?

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

An almost top 10,000 blog!

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Americans barely caring about Afghanistan is so last month.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Activist Judges! / Words of a RINO

Words of a RINO

by $8 blue check mistermix|  August 9, 20107:30 am| 30 Comments

This post is in: Activist Judges!, Gay Rights are Human Rights

FacebookTweetEmail

As E.D. notes, Ted Olson will probably be called a RINO after this appearance on Fox News Sunday. Here’s what it takes: believing in the Bill of Rights, the 14th amendment, and an independent judiciary. It’s worth watching just to see him demolish Chris Wallace’s “but you’re a conservative!” questions, including one about how he could possibly agree with Hollywood Liberal Rob Reiner.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Who’s next?
Next Post: They Hate Us For Our Freedom »

Reader Interactions

30Comments

  1. 1.

    aimai

    August 9, 2010 at 7:43 am

    I watched a big chunk of this somewhere on the intertoobz and I practically died laughing. Chris Wallace is so phenomenally stupid, and so totally surprised by what he’s hearing. And even more surprised that his canned talking points are brushed aside as so much absurdity. That guy has been living in a box. Unfortunately, its not under a highway. But its a think of beauty, right up with David Boies’ destruction of Tony Perkins.

    aimai

  2. 2.

    Napoleon

    August 9, 2010 at 7:43 am

    including one about how he could possibly agree with Hollywood Liberal Rob Reiner.

    Seriously, he asked that? So if Rob Reiner says breathing is good all conservatives will disagree? The very fact Wallace would say that out loud gives you a great window into what motivates the conservative mind.

  3. 3.

    birthmarker

    August 9, 2010 at 7:47 am

    I thought this GOS diary from a time back made some great points.

    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/4/15/857544/-We-Always-Win-(A-Cure-For-Liberal-Panic)

  4. 4.

    Mustang Bobby

    August 9, 2010 at 7:49 am

    I love the sound of Chris Wallace spluttering in the morning.

  5. 5.

    birthmarker

    August 9, 2010 at 7:50 am

    Did the link trash? I will try again.

    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/4/15/857544/-We-Always-Win-(A-Cure-For-Liberal-Panic)

  6. 6.

    birthmarker

    August 9, 2010 at 7:51 am

    Sorry. Search DKos diaries for “We Always Win.”

  7. 7.

    TR

    August 9, 2010 at 7:58 am

    Fantastic stuff.

  8. 8.

    debit

    August 9, 2010 at 8:02 am

    I loved it when Olson said something to the effect of, “People call it judicial activism when they don’t like the results” and Wallace said, “Exactly!” Olson’s reaction was, “Buh?”

  9. 9.

    Gen. Jrod and his Howling Army

    August 9, 2010 at 8:02 am

    If Ted Olson can get same-sex marriage legalized, he’ll have paid about 1% of the penance he owes for helping Bush steal the Presidency.

    I agree with Wallace on one thing. It’s very hard to imagine Olson losing a Supreme Court case. He made a rhetorical crater of Fock Snooze.

  10. 10.

    roshan

    August 9, 2010 at 8:18 am

    The video above wasn’t working for me. The link below has the video and some more context.

    http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/08/wallace-olson/

  11. 11.

    Morbo

    August 9, 2010 at 8:24 am

    @Napoleon: He did; I had watched it with a straight face up until that point, but I broke out laughing when he asked that.

  12. 12.

    r€nato

    August 9, 2010 at 8:29 am

    Chris Wallace admits that ‘judicial activism’ is just whining by losers. Awesome.

  13. 13.

    SiubhanDuinne

    August 9, 2010 at 9:06 am

    Nah. Ted Olson is actually a RINO In Name Only.

  14. 14.

    Hal

    August 9, 2010 at 9:55 am

    The shorter version of this video is Chris Wallace saying; “But Ted, you’re a conservative!” over and over, and repeating the phrase “judicial activism” every two minutes.

  15. 15.

    Agoraphobic Kleptomaniac

    August 9, 2010 at 9:55 am

    Comments from local conservatives on facebook when they saw that video:

    “Just because this guy served in the bush administration doesn’t make him a conservative”

    “Conservatism is about what is doing what is moral, and only the Father can decide what true morality is.”

    “Listening to the words of men will only blow you around like a leaf in the wind.”

    “Even if the supreme court agrees with this decision, it will still be wrong.”

    And then they brought up how William Blackstone wouldn’t have supported gay marriage.

    I’m not joking at all.

  16. 16.

    Comrade Dread

    August 9, 2010 at 9:56 am

    Yeah. I’m not in favor of SSM, but I found myself having a difficult time finding a worthwhile secular argument that would resolve itself to my libertarian principles. I couldn’t really come up with one. So I couldn’t really get all that worked up about the ruling. Frankly, at this point, I expect it.

    That’s what the judiciary is for. Sometimes I like the outcome, sometimes I don’t, but ultimately if a judge found a law (even one passed via direct democracy) unconstitutional, then there’s nothing activist about that.

    Frankly, I wish more judges weren’t afraid of being more ‘activist’ in the sense of throwing out laws that don’t pass constitutional muster.

  17. 17.

    matt

    August 9, 2010 at 9:56 am

    The six million or so Californians who did not vote yes on Prop 8 should be given some lip service too. Wallace acts like everybody wanted it.

  18. 18.

    Corner Stone

    August 9, 2010 at 9:57 am

    Dick Cheney had reasonable views on gay issues IIRC. Doesn’t make him not an asshole either.

  19. 19.

    Kurzleg

    August 9, 2010 at 10:02 am

    I love how Wallace keeps saying 7 million Californians supported the ban, as if this is some sort of trump card. First, a quick and dirty estimate says there’s something like $27 million voting-age residents in CA. This means that only about 25% of voting-age residents supported the ban. The other thing is that, what, 6.5 million voted against the ban, nearly the same as voted for it. In fact, nearly as many people didn’t vote on the ban at all as for voted on it – for and against. Does that sound like some huge travesty against democracy?

  20. 20.

    enplaned

    August 9, 2010 at 10:12 am

    Fundamental division in this country is no longer left vs right or liberal vs conservative. It’s rational vs irrational — and Ted is on the side of those who have two neurons to rub together.

  21. 21.

    Beej

    August 9, 2010 at 10:52 am

    You’ll notice that Olson refused to get drawn into the “7 million voted for, but 6.5 million voted against” sort of argument. That one is a loser because the clinching argument is simply that in our society, majority rules. What Olson refused to let go of is the fact that majority rules unless what the majority wants violates the Constitution. A good lawyer, and Olson is a great one, will not let herself/himself get drawn into a losing argument.

  22. 22.

    Kurzleg

    August 9, 2010 at 11:15 am

    Beej @ 21:

    True enough, strictly speaking. I was pointing out the misleading nature of the “7 million” comment. It’s meant to imply that it’s a majority of Californians and “the will of the people”, but when you dig into it it turns out that nearly 3/4 of voting-age Californians either opposed the ban or couldn’t be bothered to vote on it.

  23. 23.

    jesdynf

    August 9, 2010 at 11:18 am

    You know, thinking about it, I might’ve been too hard on Olson. I’m mad about That One Case, sure, but why am I mad at *him*? It was his job to make the case, after all. I’m really pissed at the Supreme Court for their reprehensible no-precedent ruling. For all I know he’s as appalled about that as I was.

    What struck me about that interview was that Wallace was actually doing a really good job. He had an opinion and he definitely tried to stick it to Olson, but look at how long Olson was allowed to speak without interruption. Olson definitely said what he intended to.

    If Olson’s view hadn’t been internally consistent, he probably would’ve run into more trouble from Wallace. I’d like to see more of that sort of thing. (Of course, if you assume that Olson’s /really good/, it might just be that he handled Wallace better than somebody else could’ve. Hard to say.)

  24. 24.

    Bill Murray

    August 9, 2010 at 11:30 am

    @jesdynf: I guess it depends on what you think about the Arkansas Project. Olson was involved in that too.

  25. 25.

    zoe kentucky

    August 9, 2010 at 11:32 am

    Yeah. I’m not in favor of SSM, but I found myself having a difficult time finding a worthwhile secular argument that would resolve itself to my libertarian principles. I couldn’t really come up with one. So I couldn’t really get all that worked up about the ruling. Frankly, at this point, I expect it.

    Why are you opposed to same-sex marriage?

    If your reasons are religious then what do you say to all of the religious organizations that are more than happy to marry same-sex couples? Why do your religious beliefs trump theirs?

  26. 26.

    MoeLarryAndJesus

    August 9, 2010 at 1:05 pm

    I would really enjoy kicking Chris Wallace in the balls.

    There’s just something about him that pisses me off.

  27. 27.

    Lizzy L

    August 9, 2010 at 1:07 pm

    zoe kentucky, do you really want to start a fight with Comrade Dread when he’s conceded the argument? He’s said that while he personally “doesn’t like” same-sex marriage, he understands that his lack of enthusiasm should not be enshrined in law. That’s a pretty reasonable stance, don’t you think?

  28. 28.

    EJ

    August 9, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    Sad that it’s so rare to find a conservative these days who claims to support the principles of the Constitution… and actually means it.

  29. 29.

    Catsy

    August 9, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    @zoe kentucky:

    Why are you opposed to same-sex marriage?
    __
    If your reasons are religious then what do you say to all of the religious organizations that are more than happy to marry same-sex couples? Why do your religious beliefs trump theirs?

    Does it matter? He just got done saying that he can’t construct a secular argument against it that comports with his principles, and so can’t get worked up over the Prop 8 ruling.

    Marriage equality supporters could really stand to do far less grilling of people who are actually capable of drawing a line between their personal preferences and secular law. You can’t make someone like something that they don’t; all you can really ask is that they refrain from trying to enforce their viewpoint on everyone else.

  30. 30.

    zoe kentucky in pittsburgh

    August 9, 2010 at 8:24 pm

    I wasn’t trying to pick a fight or even “grilling” him, I was just asking where he was coming from. In my personal life it’s rare for me to encounter anyone who openly says they’re opposed to SSM, so I wanted to know why.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • mrmoshpotato on Monday Morning Open Thread: Rise and… Feed the Beast! (Jan 30, 2023 @ 10:10am)
  • Princess on Monday Morning Open Thread: Rise and… Feed the Beast! (Jan 30, 2023 @ 10:10am)
  • Spanky on Monday Morning Open Thread: Rise and… Feed the Beast! (Jan 30, 2023 @ 10:09am)
  • Math Guy on Monday Morning Open Thread: Rise and… Feed the Beast! (Jan 30, 2023 @ 10:07am)
  • Matt McIrvin on Florida Man No More (Jan 30, 2023 @ 10:06am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!