Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

You cannot love your country only when you win.

President Musk and Trump are both poorly raised, coddled 8 year old boys.

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

… pundit janitors mopping up after the gop

People really shouldn’t expect the government to help after they watched the GOP drown it in a bathtub.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

Text STOP to opt out of updates on war plans.

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

Bad people in a position to do bad things will do bad things because they are bad people. End of story.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

I’m starting to think Jesus may have made a mistake saving people with no questions asked.

If ‘weird’ was the finish line, they ran through the tape and kept running.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

You are here: Home / Open Threads / Excellent Links / Open Thread: Memory & Forgetting

Open Thread: Memory & Forgetting

by | 118 Comments

This post is in: , ,

From Tom Scocca’s always-excellent blog at Slate, two adjacent posts on the weaknesses of old media and the strength of the new:

Lying Propaganda-Ghoul Ari Fleischer Explains How Professional, Ethical Reporting Should Work
The Atlantic has a sort of yakkity-yakkity thing up online about how Professional Journalists handle material being on or off the record. The peg is that Rolling Stone story from—when was it, back in 2005?—that got that general who was running our success in Afghanistan dismissed for being insubordinate and for having drunk and mouthy aides. Professional Journalists are still bothered by these events because the irresponsible and non-staff-employed Rolling Stone reporter went and wrote up quotations and anecdotes that he witnessed happening, rather than negotiating with his sources to produce a polite and abridged and untrue version of things…

… which comes right after a post linking (via the Awl) James Bridle’s “On Wikipedia, Cultural Patrimony, and Historiography”:

… In a world obsessed with “facts”, a more nuanced comprehension of historical process would enable us to better weigh truth, whether it concerns the evidence for going to war, the proliferation of damaging conspiracy theories, the polarisation of debate on climate change, or so many other issues. This sounds utopian, and it is. But I do believe that we’re building systems that allow us to do this better, and one of our responsibilities should be to design and architect those systems to make this explicit, and to educate.
[…] __
This particular book—or rather, set of books—is every edit made to a single Wikipedia article, The Iraq War, during the five years between the article’s inception in December 2004 and November 2009, a total of 12,000 changes and almost 7,000 pages.
__
It amounts to twelve volumes: the size of a single old-style encyclopaedia. It contains arguments over numbers, differences of opinion on relevance and political standpoints, and frequent moments when someone erases the whole thing and just writes “Saddam Hussein was a dickhead”.
__
This is historiography. This is what culture actually looks like: a process of argument, of dissenting and accreting opinion, of gradual and not always correct codification.
__
And for the first time in history, we’re building a system that, perhaps only for a brief time but certainly for the moment, is capable of recording every single one of those infinitely valuable pieces of information. Everything should have a history button.

Reader Interactions

118Comments

  1. 1.

    burnspbesq

    Perhaps everything should have a history button, but that seems no more likely than Sarah Palin being admitted to membership in the Anchorage chapter of Mensa.

    History has always been written by the winners, and I am struggling to find a reason to believe that that will change any time soon.

  4. 4.

    MattR

    @burnspbesq: Nonetheless, I find myself empathizing with this person

    frequent moments when someone erases the whole thing and just writes “Saddam Hussein was a dickhead”.

  6. 6.

    geg6

    Well, and sometimes your history catches up with you. Case in point:

    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/9/7/899749/-KY-Sen:-Rand-Paul-staffer-caught-posing-as-progressive-at-Daily-Kos

    Funnier than usual to me because, after years of refusing to wade into any comment threads on the GOS, I had a moment of boredom yesterday and waded into a thread where “Huey Long” was commenting and I knew right away that his comments weren’t sounding like someone who really was a liberal/progressive, but who had read up on the lexicon and thought he could “pass.” After reading a few of his comments, I realized that the screen name “Huey Long” was the tell. Ratfucker meet ratfucker.

  8. 8.

    BGinCHI

    If you want to read a great, scholarly book on this kind of thing, in terms of the way Renaissance libraries were formed out of the medieval manuscript tradition (monastic) that preceded it, see Jennifer Summit’s Memory’s Library: Medieval Books in Early Modern England.

    For a slightly more historiographical account, you could also read Annabel Patterson’s Reading Holinshed’s Chronicles.

    Great post.

  9. 9.

    burnspbesq

    If you have a bit of time on your hands and a taste for the surreal, I suggest that you head over to the Atlantic and read Goldberg’s account of his recent meetings with Fidel Castro.

  10. 10.

    J sub D

    Over at the website for the left of center rag The National Review’s website, Martin Peretz concludes a rambling, disjointed piece with

    But, frankly, Muslim life is cheap, most notably to Muslims. And among those Muslims led by the Imam Rauf there is hardly one who has raised a fuss about the routine and random bloodshed that defines their brotherhood. So, yes, I wonder whether I need honor these people and pretend that they are worthy of the privileges of the First Amendment which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse.

    Got that? The first amendment is about privileges and he wonders if Muslims are “worthy” of them.

  12. 12.

    burnspbesq

    @valdivia:

    Soros’ interview with Inskeep on NPR this morning is well worth a listen. The gist of it is that HRW must evolve into a primarily non-American organization, because America has squandered it’s moral authority.

    Sad, but hard to argue against.

  15. 15.

    Joseph Nobles

    OT: Lawrence Wright’s one-man show “My Trip to Al-Qaeda” has been filmed for HBO and will debut tonight. It’s about his experiences and what he learned while writing the Pulitzer-Prize winning “The Looming Tower.” For my money, it’s the best account of where Al-Qaeda came from and how they did what they did. I’m preemptively recommending this documentary highly.

  16. 16.

    burnspbesq

    @J sub D:

    I think we had this conversation a few days ago, and failed to reach a consensus on the question of whether Peretz is evil or merely stupid.

  17. 17.

    BGinCHI

    @J sub D: doesn’t Marty know that without exactly the First Amendment protections he’s ignoring we would have had him clubbed like a seal ages ago?

    I thought elites were supposed to be smart.

  18. 18.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    @J sub D: I hated giving up my digital subscription to TNR because I liked Chait and some of the other writers, but I really did feel the need to stop supporting Marty.

  20. 20.

    geg6

    @J sub D:

    If it wouldn’t be taken as a serious threat by too many people around here without any sort of a sense of snark, I’d say that Marty Peretz’s life is pretty damn cheap, AFAIC. But since we have a lot of delicate flowers around here, I’ll just say fuck that racist piece of shit, Marty Peretz, and fuck anyone who lowers themselves to below-snail level in order to cash a paycheck signed by that piece of shit. The entire staff of the TNR should resign and the fact that they don’t tells me all I need to know about them.

  23. 23.

    J sub D

    Make that The New Republic vice The National Review in my 4:30pm comment.

    I always get the names of those two TNR’s confused.

  26. 26.

    Mark S.

    Almost all of what Hastings said appears to be based on the idea that HIS assumptions were shared by McChrystal and his staff. What seems clear in retrospect is that the agreement was vague enough that Hastings was free to interpret it to his journalistic advantage.

    I would assume that unless someone says the safe words like “off the record” or “deep throat,” it’s on the record. But what do I know? Here’s Tim Russert, the most beloved man in American history, on the subject:

    My personal policy is always off the record when talking to government officials unless specified.

  28. 28.

    J sub D

    @burnspbesq:

    I think we had this conversation a few days ago, and failed to reach a consensus on the question of whether Peretz is evil or merely stupid.

    A dessert topping and a floor polish.

    Why the supposedly respectable New Republic would allow that sort of trash on their site is incomprehensible.

  29. 29.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    @J sub D: Thinking about the block quote a bit more, it’s got that rather generic, I-am-a-Conservative-and-hate-X feel to it:

    But, frankly, ____x____ life is cheap, most notably to ___x____s. And among those ____x____s led by the _____y______ there is hardly one who has raised a fuss about the routine and random bloodshed that defines their brotherhood. So, yes, I wonder whether I need honor these people and pretend that they are worthy of the privileges of the First Amendment which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse.

    Try these substitutions:
    x=African American, y=Jeremiah Wright
    x=Hispanic, y=(ok I can’t think of a prominent hispanic leader)

  30. 30.

    burnspbesq

    @geg6:

    With the unemployment rate where it is, I do not insist on futile symbolic gestures from Chait or Cohn. Peretz is who he is, and nothing is likely to change that.

  32. 32.

    MikeJ

    @Mark S.: Just saying “off the record” doesn’t make it so. It’s a request that a journalist can accept or decline.

    Anything a journalist sees or hears, anytime, anywhere, is on the record unless she agrees beforehand that it is not the case.

  33. 33.

    Southern Beale

    … . The peg is that Rolling Stone story from—when was it, back in 2005? …

    ???

    I thought that Rolling Stone story was, like, three months ago. My how time flies.

  35. 35.

    artem1s

    How I wish the bible had a history button. It would be so fun to egg on fundies about which version they were currently touting as absolutely true. I wonder if Conservapedia’s history button is accessible to the masses?

  38. 38.

    Sentient Puddle

    OT: Who wants to bet that this gets reported? Gallup, a week after finding Republicans have a 10 point advantage on the generic ballot, now find it tied.

    Seriously, what the fuck kind of sample size are they using that gives them that much noise?

  42. 42.

    bemused

    ot but Chris Matthews just played a clip from Obama’s speech and said he just got a thrill up his leg. Has no one told Matthews to drop the thrill up his leg bit yet?

  46. 46.

    BGinCHI

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    The people in those “I’ve fallen and can’t get up” commercials always do.

    Good to see you over here. It’s like seeing someone from the local at a bar in another ‘hood.

  48. 48.

    Southern Beale

    @BGinCHI: Land line, what’s that? Do people still have them?

    We still have a landline. I don’t know why but we do. I have a cell phone, Skype on the ‘puter, and a land line. And I make like 4 phone calls a year cuz I hate the phone.

    Go figure.

  49. 49.

    Corner Stone

    @bemused: He also just played his Politico sourced “Big Number” that zero House D’s are running ads featuring HCR.
    But I have to believe that’s just due to timing so far. Surely there’s a D leaning district somewhere that would be cheered up by seeing it talked about?

  50. 50.

    Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther

    Ooh! Ooh! Open Thread! Where I can do legitimately what I did illegitimately on one of DougJ’s threads earlier today!

    To wit:

    GAH!!

    MARTY PERETZ IS MAKING MY HEAD CAVE IN!!

    But, frankly, Muslim life is cheap, most notably to Muslims. And among those Muslims led by the Imam Rauf there is hardly one who has raised a fuss about the routine and random bloodshed that defines their brotherhood. So, yes, I wonder whether I need honor these people and pretend that they are worthy of the privileges of the First Amendment which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse.

    GAH!! Here’s my very ranty response:

    http://emilylhauserinmyhead.wo…..cheap-wtf/

  53. 53.

    Mnemosyne

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    We still have a landline, because cell phones don’t work after an earthquake. If you’re on the West Coast and don’t have access to a landline, you’re taking an awfully big risk.

  54. 54.

    Suffern Ace

    @valdivia: And very few seem to be commenting on the President’s statement that he will not sign legislation privatizing social security. After nearly jumping off a cliff about that possibility for months. It’s just the stimulus is too small. Good grief.

  57. 57.

    bemused

    @Belafon (formerly anonevent):
    Oh, he didn’t stop there. He seems to get more thrilled as he talks about getting a thrill up his leg. Whoever he was talking to said something about the tingle and Matthews corrected him. Evidently there is quite a difference between a thrill and a tingle. Who knew.

  58. 58.

    Corner Stone

    @Suffern Ace:

    And very few seem to be commenting on the President’s statement that he will not sign legislation privatizing social security. After nearly jumping off a cliff about that possibility for months.

    “Privatizing” was never the concern.

  59. 59.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    @Mnemosyne: Do you have your ham radio license? If you are worried about an earthquake, I would recommend the only true system that will be functional in a disaster.

  60. 60.

    El Cid

    @Sentient Puddle:

    Results are based on telephone interviews conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking survey Aug. 30-Sept. 5, 2010, with a random sample of 1,651 registered voters, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using random-digit-dial sampling.
    __
    For results based on the total sample of registered voters, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

    From the link. Significantly larger sample size than needed for 95% confidence level at the margin of error.

  62. 62.

    bemused

    @Corner Stone:
    I had the same thought. There was an article in the Mpls Star Tribune about parents very relieved that their insurance companies were going to kick in on insuring their early 20’s kids. There are some benefits taking effect now that the Dems could talk about.

  63. 63.

    Sad_Dem

    “The Oriental doesn’t put the same high price on life as does a Westerner…We value life and human dignity. They don’t care about life and human dignity.”

    –William Westmoreland

  64. 64.

    Sentient Puddle

    @El Cid: OK, yeah, missed that part. Still, something strikes me as being really out of whack with what they’re doing over there. They’ve been showing too many big swings for me to consider plausible.

  65. 65.

    SiubhanDuinne

    @licensed to kill time #37: Swear to god, I was positive that was going to link to The Onion.

  66. 66.

    Ed in NJ

    @Sentient Puddle:

    OT: Who wants to bet that this gets reported? Gallup, a week after finding Republicans have a 10 point advantage on the generic ballot, now find it tied.

    Seriously, what the fuck kind of sample size are they using that gives them that much noise?

    It just goes to show that no one really knows what’s going to happen in November, despite the media and Republicans’ best efforts to control the message that there is a Republican wave coming.

    Now that the serious season is starting, more and more stories highlighting what might happen in terms of legislation, investigations, redistricting, gridlock are popping up, just in time, hopefully, to shake progressives out of their doldrums.

  67. 67.

    Bill Murray

    @J sub D: That’s pretty much the bog standard right wing view of the Bill of Rights. Justice Scalia (I think it was him anyway) has said that the Constitution outlines the limit of rights for people. Also that the Bill of Rights defines privileges extended by the government to the people (this may not have been Scalia)

  68. 68.

    Corner Stone

    @bemused:

    There was an article in the Mpls Star Tribune about parents very relieved that their insurance companies were going to kick in on insuring their early 20’s kids.

    Not to derail this OT thread or anything but this factoid is what I find amusing when people talk about motivating 20 something yr old voters.
    Their parents are scared to death about health insurance, and love love love the extension in age. The 20 somethings do not consider it to be a big deal. That’s anecdotal, no polling or anything.

  70. 70.

    Suffern Ace

    @Sad_Dem: One almost expects him to add “And they don’t love their children as much as we do, either.” That line between galling bigotry and regular old smugness isn’t all that fine.

  71. 71.

    roshan

    Probably the most important article you will read today, especially the folks with kids in school.

    Forget What You Know About Good Study Habits
    __
    In recent years, cognitive scientists have shown that a few simple techniques can reliably improve what matters most: how much a student learns from studying.
    __
    For instance, instead of sticking to one study location, simply alternating the room where a person studies improves retention. So does studying distinct but related skills or concepts in one sitting, rather than focusing intensely on a single thing.
    __
    But individual learning is another matter, and psychologists have discovered that some of the most hallowed advice on study habits is flat wrong. For instance, many study skills courses insist that students find a specific place, a study room or a quiet corner of the library, to take their work. The research finds just the opposite. In one classic 1978 experiment, psychologists found that college students who studied a list of 40 vocabulary words in two different rooms — one windowless and cluttered, the other modern, with a view on a courtyard — did far better on a test than students who studied the words twice, in the same room. Later studies have confirmed the finding, for a variety of topics.
    __
    Varying the type of material studied in a single sitting — alternating, for example, among vocabulary, reading and speaking in a new language — seems to leave a deeper impression on the brain than does concentrating on just one skill at a time.

  72. 72.

    Corner Stone

    @burnspbesq: They have different priorities, and they evaluate risk differently. Some can argue improper weighting, but in my limited exposure, that’s just how it is.
    Not defending their empirical process, or lack thereof.

  74. 74.

    Roger Moore

    @Belafon (formerly anonevent):

    If you are worried about an earthquake, I would recommend the only true system that will be functional in a disaster.

    Ham radio is great until the earthquake damages your antenna or a collapsing house crushes your transmitter. Meanwhile, the human voice will still work as long as there are people there to send and receive messages. So if you want a system that’s guaranteed to work, take yodeling lessons.

  77. 77.

    Corner Stone

    @roshan: I don’t have any studies bookmarked to cite, but there have been several that indicate people who multi task are less efficient.
    And they considerably over rate their ability to perform tasks.

    Just personally, I like to read when it’s quiet, study when it’s quiet and think when it’s quiet.
    I never get to do that with work, and as a single guy with a 5 yr old boy running around non stop I think we all know why I’m losing cognitive ability every day.
    Well, that and all the alcohol.

  84. 84.

    geg6

    @roshan:

    As someone who has done research on learning styles and multiple intelligences (and even been published!), I have to say that this sounds like a very simplistic take on optimal learning environments. No one method or environment works for all or even most. In my research and in all my years in education, the best way to get anyone to learn is to present the material to a class and have the students study in a variety of ways in a variety of environments and have the students add active learning activities. Some students do need quiet spaces, some need to touch or taste or hear, some need to read or see. Some learn best in isolation, some as part of a group. And most need a combination of all these thing because we all have multiple intelligences and it is rare that an individual has one that is dominant. We usually learn best by appealing to all of our innate intelligences using learning strategies that appeal to each of them. By having students experiment with learning strategies, they eventually learn what works best for them. I didn’t read the article, but pointing to a study from 1978 (well before the recent plethora of research on this very matter that became possible with technology such as brain imaging and such) as an example does not incline me to take the article very seriously.

  85. 85.

    Corner Stone

    If I had a time machine and an opportunity to take out one historical figure, who would it be?
    I’m going with Ronald Reagan.
    And where this nation, and possibly the world after us, is headed it may not be as selfish as it first sounds.

  86. 86.

    Corner Stone

    There are many things I enjoy more than watching Chuckles, Todd and John Heilemann discuss the Democrats chances in this upcoming election.

  89. 89.

    Anne Laurie

    @moe99:

    If you know any Catholic tea baggers, you might tell them that they were first on the ‘persecute illegal immigrants list.

    Well, Ben Franklin was dubious about the ability of those miserable German refugees to assimiliate, but I don’t think he actually tried to keep them from immigrating.

    When I was in parochial school, the nuns actually taught us about the Know-Nothings in the context of not slamming the door in the face of the next batch of scary furriners, but I guess more recent Church scholars have had to eliminate that lesson bloc to make room for “Why the Talibangelicals Are Now Our BFFs” pamphleteering.

  90. 90.

    MikeJ

    @John W.: Conventional wisdom is that having Scocca makes Slate better, but I’ll now spend 800 words explaining how better writers *hurt* websites.

    Just practicing to be a typical Slater.

  91. 91.

    Cain

    Kinda boring now.. I’ve been searching all over the internets looking for something to be outraged about.

    I need emo

    cain

  92. 92.

    slightly_peeved

    Since it’s an Open Thread, Australia now has a government. Labor, in conjunction with the Australian Green Party and 2 independents, has reached a majority in the lower house:
    ABC news

    It should be pointed out that at the start of the campaign, Gillard massively out-polled her opponent, Tony “The Mad Monk” Abbot, but due to running a horrible campaign ended up in a dead heat in the election.

    The demographics of Australia are pretty different to the US, particularly with compulsory voting, but the recent election shows the importance of running a good campaign. Abbot’s known for his verbal gaffes and his confrontational attitude, but ran a good campaign by essentially keeping his mouth shut for 2 months. Considering how badly the Tea Party candidates have been campaigning so far, and their unwillingness to keep their mouth shut, that’s a cause for hope for the Democratic party.

  93. 93.

    Cain

    @Corner Stone:

    If I had a time machine and an opportunity to take out one historical figure, who would it be?
    I’m going with Ronald Reagan.
    And where this nation, and possibly the world after us, is headed it may not be as selfish as it first sounds

    I would have shot Christopher Columbus. Best bang for buck. We delay the discovery of the new world, save a whole bunch of indians, and what not.

    It might be worse since by the time they did get to America, they would be a lot more technically advanced than the indians and it could be a lo more brutal.

    Hopefully, the dutch would discover the new world and we would be a lot better off.

    cain

  94. 94.

    Cain

    @Eric S.:

    In a local to me and a few others here, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley will not run for re-election. I suspect it is going to get ugly and I’m rubbing my hands together in anticipation of all the fun. Rahm has said in the past he’s interested in the job but wouldn’t run against King Daley.

    Wow kind of an end of an era.. a Daley has been running Chicago for a long long time.

    cain

  96. 96.

    FlipYrWhig

    It’s come up a few times here that Blue Dogs and conservative Democrats are the ones on the chopping block if there’s a Republican wave. Saw this on the Great Orange Satan:

    DCCC releases five polls with Dem incumbents hanging tough. It covers the races of Bobby Bright, Michael Arcuri, Larry Kissell, Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin, and Tom Perriello.

    AFAIK, four of these five are among the liberal blogosphere’s favorite whipping boys, Democrats who flip the bird at liberals over and over again. And they’re looking pretty solid for reelection. Perriello is close, but behind.

  97. 97.

    Cain

    @stuckinred:

    @Cain: There was sort of a gap in there from 76 to 89.

    Oh really? huh.. never noticed I guess. We used to hit Chicago a lot in that time frame… Chicago was our destination especially Devon street for Indian groceries and **shudder** sari shopping.. there is one thing in the whole world I **hate** more than anything and that is sari shopping.. god, just murder me with a spoon while being water-boarded. Ugh.

    cain

  98. 98.

    Cain

    @FlipYrWhig:

    DCCC releases five polls with Dem incumbents hanging tough. It covers the races of Bobby Bright, Michael Arcuri, Larry Kissell, Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin, and Tom Perriello.

    I’m slightly worried about our governor’s race in Oregon. I’m going to have to start volunteering my time there.

    also it seems that Obama’s group is looking for a few volunteers to call people in other states. Since Oregon is pretty safely democratic at the congress level, I can probably work to get better democrats in other states. I encourage everyone else to start moving and helping the campaigns with some muscle. We got a country to save.

    cain

  103. 103.

    Suffern ACE

    @stuckinred: i remember mayor Jane in the news so much when I was a kid. I thought she was mayor of my hometown in Wisconsin. When the actual mayor came to visit my 2nd grade class, I asked him if he worked for her.

  107. 107.

    FlipYrWhig

    @Garrigus Carraig: I thought Harold Washington was supposed to be a huge local hero. No?

    (OK, some of my information is based on the fact that Eddie Murphy’s Delirious–oh, dayamn, I just looked it up and that was 1983!–has a whole bit about black politicians, involving Harold Washington and Jesse Jackson.)

    ETA: Whoops, I thought you were being sarcastic when you described him as “the great Harold Washington.” Doh!

  113. 113.

    Cain

    @TooManyJens:

    @Cain: Now I have to ask: what’s so bad about sari shopping? Worse than any other shopping, anyway.

    Well for a guy (and 8 year old kid), it’s just staring at a bundle of cloth. Think going to So-Fro fabrics and purchasing fabric, it’s bout the same thing except you have to get a blouse to go with it. At least, with normal clothes you can check out the styles and what not.. but this is sari shopping, it’s just color and a couple yards of cloth. BORING. Plus, there doesn’t seem a particular point to it. Most people my mother’s age wore western clothings (including my mother) and yet, they still buy it. So if they purchased something they probably won’t wear it for months. Plus it’s cheaper in India, so why bother?

    Meh. They used to threaten us as kids when we were in India, cuz we were hyper active road runners.. but we were cooped up in the house for 3 months so any excuse to go out and relieve the boredom was worth it.. except for sari shopping. So, if my parents were going out, we’ll all be like, “i’m coming, I’m coming!” then my mom would sternly tell us, “no, we’re going sari shopping”.. aieeee.. sari shopping.. backpedaled… rather stay at home and burn ants with a magnifying glass.

    cain

  114. 114.

    Cain

    @Garrigus Carraig:

    @Cain: Oh, how could you forget the great Harold Washington?

    I wasn’t paying attention I was only like just a teenager. I didn’t start understanding or caring about politics till I was about 16-17. In which case, I immediately started bashing Reagan. Hell even at that age I knew that voodoo economics was a non-starter and I didn’t even take high school economics then. But at least the republicans were fairly sane back then. The dems I always felt were a little crooked.

    cain

  116. 116.

    Cain

    @Davis X. Machina:

    @Cain: Tell that to the Indonesians….

    They all sucked.. you just have to pick someone. If you look now, the people who have done the most damage are the British.. They really fucked things up back when.

    cain

  118. 118.

    Prospero

    OT: Who wants to bet that this gets reported? Gallup, a week after finding Republicans have a 10 point advantage on the generic ballot, now find it tied.

    That’s how: AAAACOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRNNNNN!

Comments are closed.