• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Ah, the different things are different argument.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Usually wrong but never in doubt

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

I’m sure you banged some questionable people yourself.

Second rate reporter says what?

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

We still have time to mess this up!

No one could have predicted…

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Innocent people don’t delay justice.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

In short, I come down firmly on all sides of the issue.

I really should read my own blog.

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / Lie to Me, I Promise to Believe

Lie to Me, I Promise to Believe

by $8 blue check mistermix|  September 13, 20107:42 am| 34 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Daniel Larison spent the weekend uncovering the lies that serious, reasonable conservatives tell.

First, John Fund tells a whopper while trying to gin up a “Gillibrand Upset” story. Of course, the notion that Gillibrand’s opponent has any kind of chance is crazy itself. In tomorrow’s New York primary, three Rebublican nobodies will be competing for the honor of being crushed by Gillibrand in November, after all the big names (Rudy 911 and Pataki) bravely ran away.

Then there’s David Frum, who thinks that the country that suffered the worst post-9/11 violence from Islamic extremists was France. Never mind Madrid and London.

Remember, these are the reasonable Republicans, not the teabagger fringe loonies.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Not A Joke
Next Post: Zombie Eyes Don’t Blink »

Reader Interactions

34Comments

  1. 1.

    cleek

    September 13, 2010 at 7:48 am

    Let Me Lie To You

  2. 2.

    Comrade Javamanphil

    September 13, 2010 at 8:09 am

    The new GOP mantra: Trust but leave it to Beck/Palin to verify.

  3. 3.

    Sly

    September 13, 2010 at 8:09 am

    In tomorrow’s New York primary, three Rebublican nobodies will be competing for the honor of being crushed by Gillibrand in November, after all the big names (Rudy 911 and Pataki) bravely ran away.

    Gillibrand’s team already cut an ad that highlights that it doesn’t really matter who the Republicans pick: Any one of them is too stupid for the job.

    Schumer also has two sacrificial lambs Republicans out for his seat. He could fall into a coma that lasts between now and election day and he’d still win.

  4. 4.

    Larry Signor

    September 13, 2010 at 8:10 am

    Ed at ginandtacos makes the point that we are all “fringe loonies”, now. An argument worth the read.

  5. 5.

    Anya

    September 13, 2010 at 8:13 am

    So, what does Forum say happened to France? They were assaulted by the sight of countless socially excluded Muslim women wearing hijab?

  6. 6.

    dearolddad

    September 13, 2010 at 8:17 am

    Reasonable republicans? Don’t call my ox a moron!

  7. 7.

    Napoleon

    September 13, 2010 at 8:24 am

    John Fund, one of those “reasonable people” that shows up on Diane Rheems show from time to time, like Mark Kirkorian

  8. 8.

    James Hare

    September 13, 2010 at 8:30 am

    Regardless of the predictable lies of the Republicans, all is well in Washington. The Redskins beat the Cowboys.

  9. 9.

    stuckinred

    September 13, 2010 at 8:31 am

    @Larry Signor: Killer!

  10. 10.

    PeakVT

    September 13, 2010 at 8:38 am

    As an antidote to stupidity for a Monday morning, I recommend Nina Totenbagger’s review of Stephen Bryer’s new book. Good stuff.

  11. 11.

    4tehlulz

    September 13, 2010 at 8:39 am

    @Anya: I think it was the shear number of fee-fees hurt at the sight of Muslims refusing to become “French” (i.e., white).

  12. 12.

    BenJammin' Cisco

    September 13, 2010 at 8:52 am

    There is not such thing as Peak Wingnut (R), errr, a “reasonable conservative.”

  13. 13.

    Nick

    September 13, 2010 at 8:53 am

    So speaking of Lying to me, how about a little truth.

    Linda McMahon’s newest commercial flat out admits business owners are holding back hiring because of “the fear of Obama’s agenda”

    Another words they’re holding the country hostage to prevent good policies from being enacted.

    and Linda “gets it” and “will make the politicians get it”

    By getting it, that means giving millionaires what they want so they’ll hire us as their indentured servants again.

  14. 14.

    Allison W.

    September 13, 2010 at 8:59 am

    @Sly:

    thanks for that link to the ad. It was great.

    Not here. Not now. Not ever. – damn straight. keep that crazy back there!

  15. 15.

    jibeaux

    September 13, 2010 at 9:01 am

    The French are seriously weird about their Frenchiness. I am not sure it’s exactly an Islamophobia as more of a “zoutalor, you live in FRAAAAAANCE, you must be ze FREEEENCH” thing. But I’ve had this conversation with a French person who is probably 95% to the left of me, and this is one of two points of view that really stood out, the idea that your religious and cultural identity should really remain private and confined to your living room, and whenever you’re in public you better be trying to look and act like everyone else, and the French don’t wear headscarves unless they’re Hermes. The other point of view that stands out is not only do they not care about the infidelity of politicians, which I think is reasonable, they actually seem to think it’s so normal that it would be quite weird if they didn’t.

    Oh, and I wasn’t around all weekend, it was very hectic, but I see now that AnneLaurie put up my Graham rescue story and thanks a great deal for that. The puppy is great, and fills a much-needed void, as they say :) because our budget is always such that in any instance in which it appears that we may be able to save money, some brave and noble appliance, vehicle, or other exigency steps in to save the day. In the first month for nine years that we had no child care expenses, we paid out $600 to the vet and kennel. Therefore, all is right with the world.

  16. 16.

    The Tragically Flip

    September 13, 2010 at 9:04 am

    Frum gets way too much credit for his supposed “reasonable” schtick. Whatever he’s doing, it’s just what he thinks the Republicans need to do to get him more wars and blood spilt to make the world “safe” for warmongering vile twits like him.

    If he thought that teahad was the way to do it, he’d be doing that. Glad to see him called out.

  17. 17.

    The Bearded Blogger

    September 13, 2010 at 9:08 am

    @jibeaux: France and the United States are the two countries that suffer from a “we’re number 1” complex. There’s bigotry and chauvinism in other countries, of course (Belgium!), but the idea of a country being exceptional among others, somehow towering above, is proper to these two. Also accounts for the mutual dislike.

  18. 18.

    WereBear

    September 13, 2010 at 9:09 am

    @The Tragically Flip: Frum gets way too much credit for his supposed “reasonable” schtick.

    In a world where teatards are expected to be violently opposed to masturbation… perhaps Frum is a “reasonable” Republican.

    But it’s like being a polite serial killer; we still don’t want you around.

  19. 19.

    Moses2317

    September 13, 2010 at 9:20 am

    The problem is that it is getting awfully difficult to tell the difference between “reasonable” Republicans and “teabagger fringe loonies.” This is not your parents’ Republican party anymore.

    Winning Progressive

  20. 20.

    jibeaux

    September 13, 2010 at 9:36 am

    @The Bearded Blogger:

    I think you’re absolutely right about that. But they’re two slightly different flavors, I think — while we certainly have plenty of Amurica-lovin’ rednecks who don’t cotton to folks who are different, the flavor that lets a liberal professional academic say things about headscarves belonging in private homes not in a FRENCH PARK dammit — seems to be pretty French. Maybe it’s just that we have a stronger tolerance of individualism (except for those vile entities known as HOAs) and other countries have a firmer embrace of a shared national identity. I kind of doubt hijabs would go over well in Japan, either, if Japan had any immigrants to speak of.

  21. 21.

    Mike Furlan

    September 13, 2010 at 9:40 am

    @Moses2317:

    Larison is a proud member of The League of the South which

    “is a neo-Confederate group that advocates for a second Southern secession and a society dominated by “European Americans.” The league believes the “godly” nation it wants to form should be run by an “Anglo-Celtic” (read: white) elite that would establish a Christian theocratic state and politically dominate blacks and other minorities.”

    http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/groups/league-of-the-south

    Sounds pretty loony to me.

    Can somebody explain to me why he is such a favorite around here?

  22. 22.

    Jennifer

    September 13, 2010 at 9:42 am

    Larison’s takedown of Dinesh D’Souza’s twaddle in the WSJ was even better than his takedowns of Fund and Frum.

  23. 23.

    numbskull

    September 13, 2010 at 9:52 am

    @Mike Furlan:

    Sounds pretty loony to me.
    Can somebody explain to me why he is such a favorite around here?

    Most of what JC seems to like about him is simple, self-serving (in a good way) reasonableness that you would expect from anyone who understands that what he writes today just might come back to haunt him tomorrow. This, of course, never enters the minds of most “conservatives”, so it sets Larison apart somewhat.

    Other than that, I don’t know why he’s such a favorite. His ruminations may be “deep” for the libertarian/conservative/whatever-the-hell-he-is crowd, but he’d be laughed off the FP of most centrist or lefty blogs, IMO.

  24. 24.

    Frank L

    September 13, 2010 at 9:59 am

    @The Tragically Flip: o/t, but great handle.

  25. 25.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 10:07 am

    @Mike Furlan:

    Can somebody explain to me why he is such a favorite around here?

    I would guess it is because he is thoughtful (comparatively) and engages in actual discussions with people who are on the other side of the aisle. I do not think that cite his arguments necessarily implies an endorsement of his views. If it does, it is limited to the view expressed in the cited piece. Larison’s loony ideas remain loony; his sensible ideas stay sensible.

  26. 26.

    aimai

    September 13, 2010 at 10:12 am

    Its important to remember, in re the French, that they were anti-clerical before anti-clerical was cool. Americans simply can’t remember theocracy and the role of the church–a single church–in dominating political life. The French do. They actually fought, very recently, against the domination of the Catholic Church in every aspect of private and public life. The argument that people should strictly keep their religious life/canon law/sharia law in their own homes is an important one. Where plural societies have problems is in the potentially oppressive and anti democratic role some religious communities exert on some of their own membership: women and children specifically. Freedom of religious practice for adult males often means lack of freedom of choice for dependents of all kinds. At that point things get complicated as the individual’s membership in the larger society can conflict with the religious communities need to control its own membership and to prevent individual women, children, and dissaffected men from “voting with their feet.”

    You see just this issue in divorce among orthodox Jews–where the woman can legally get a divorce under American law but is at the mercy of her husband’s willingness to give her a “get” under (some) Jewish Law. You see it, as well, among Catholics who can get divorced and remarried under US law but not in the Church. The determination of small, religious sects, to control their junior members (women and children) is seen in the perennial opposition of right wing Christians to anything that smacks of a “children’s rights” movement since a child’s right (to an education, to medical care, to freedom of religion) might come into conflict with the parent’s right to determine the child’s options and behavior.

    aimai

  27. 27.

    Luthe

    September 13, 2010 at 11:41 am

    I think this is relevant to your interests:

    Lying Your Way to Crazy by Fred Clark (Slacktivist).

    A selection (pray the block-quote works):

    So the next step becomes to suggest that the CBO is lying, that it is somehow, for some reason, deliberately misrepresenting the effects of the Recovery Act. They thus go from bearing false witness against the proponents of the Recovery Act to bearing false witness against the CBO too. Bearing false witness turns out to be kind of like eating pistachios. You just can’t seem stop after the first one.
    …
    Accusing the CBO of lying pushes them further into unreality. That step requires an even slipperier step of trying to explain why the CBO would be lying, which almost always leads to the vague suggestion that the nonpartisan agency can no longer be trusted because they’re “in on it.” The suggestion, in other words, of a vast, shadowy conspiracy.
    …
    This is the destiny and destination for everyone who chooses to play Family Feud politics and/or to bear false witness: Conspiracy theory.
    …
    Once you choose to prefer manufactured perception to reality or to deny reality about others, you wind up pitting yourself against every arbiter of reality. You will be forced to accuse them all of lying — of being “in on it.” Eventually, you will be forced to embrace the theory of a conspiracy so vast that it includes and encompasses any and every arbiter of reality which might cast doubt on the false perception to which you’re committed: the press, the media, researchers, scientists, NASA, teachers, doctors, the courts, authors, photographers, philosophers and intellectuals and artists of every stripe. And even, to paraphrase Groucho, “your own lying eyes.” Even your five senses can’t be trusted because they will seem to be “in on it” too.
    …
    Once you arrive at that destination, you’ve metamorphosed from a liar into a fool. You’re no longer bearing false witness, you’re just stupid and crazy. It’s not a pleasant thing to behold.

  28. 28.

    Cris

    September 13, 2010 at 12:14 pm

    @aimai: Americans simply can’t remember theocracy and the role of the church—a single church—in dominating political life.

    Not surprising, then, that so many Americans seem keen to live under a theocracy.

  29. 29.

    Quaker in a Basement

    September 13, 2010 at 12:32 pm

    Never mind Madrid and London.

    There was also a small incident in Mumbai. It was in the papers.

    Oh, wait. That didn’t involve Western Europeans. Prbly doesn’t count, right?

  30. 30.

    Joel

    September 13, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    Then there’s David Frum, who thinks that the country that suffered the worst post-9/11 violence from Islamic extremists was France. Never mind Madrid and London.

    How about Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan?

  31. 31.

    sparky

    September 13, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    if one stops thinking of these pieces as anything other than press releases, one will be less annoyed with them.
    well, somewhat. sometimes.

    the Frum piece, which i foolishly read, is of the form of “pick the most unreasonable remarks you can find, pretend that they are representative, and ergo show how you are right after all.” in other words, like claiming comments on a blog should be ascribed to the blog’s proprietor. a better hack would write something else that was not such a thoroughgoing example of chock-a-block nitwit whinging. maybe he had to show a draft to cash his check late last Friday. OTOH he’s demonstrated in the past that to him, facts are just pesky misconstructions, so who knows?

    as for Larison, he makes no secret of his cultural views, writes clearly, and is perhaps the most articulate exponent of what might be called classical american isolationism. AFAIK he’s also honest, which is a plus. as to his theories about the US civil war, the best i can say is that his view is rather idiosyncratic. i think it is deeply incorrect, but i don’t think that alone justifies ignoring everything he writes, any more than one would be justified in ignoring the writing of everyone who believes in a FSM that has wider noodles than your FSM.

  32. 32.

    Tax Analyst

    September 13, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    Lie to Me, I Promise to Believe –

    Sheryl Crow lyric reference? (“Strong Enough”)

  33. 33.

    Mike Furlan

    September 13, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:
    And to numbskull.

    Just seems odd to me to quote Larison in a post titled “Lie to Me. . .”

    To take him seriously you must buy into his lies. Which is to say you are doing exactly what you are suggesting other folks are doing.

  34. 34.

    Mike Furlan

    September 13, 2010 at 6:59 pm

    @sparky:
    If he wasn’t doing PhD level work in history at a good university you could accept his understanding of American history as “idiosyncratic.”

    He is not stupid, he can’t pretend that he doesn’t know, the only possibility left is that he is lying to cover up his “incovenient” white supremacists beliefs.

    And can’t take his “proud” membership in The League of the South as anything other than a white power salute.

    He is just too smart and too educated to play the “stupid game.” The “we are just harmless good old boys proud of our heritage” scam.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Ruckus on RFKlown Jr’s Twitter-Space Open Thread: Musk Now Boosting Jack Dorsey’s Endorsed Candidate (Jun 6, 2023 @ 2:41am)
  • Sister Inspired Revolver of Freedom on War for Ukraine Day 467: The Cost Part I’ve Lost Count (Jun 6, 2023 @ 2:28am)
  • Steve in the ATL on RFKlown Jr’s Twitter-Space Open Thread: Musk Now Boosting Jack Dorsey’s Endorsed Candidate (Jun 6, 2023 @ 2:25am)
  • Carlo Graziani on War for Ukraine Day 467: The Cost Part I’ve Lost Count (Jun 6, 2023 @ 2:22am)
  • NotMax on RFKlown Jr’s Twitter-Space Open Thread: Musk Now Boosting Jack Dorsey’s Endorsed Candidate (Jun 6, 2023 @ 2:21am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!