• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Battle won, war still ongoing.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

When do the post office & the dmv weigh in on the wuhan virus?

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

I’m sure you banged some questionable people yourself.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / More bad economic news

More bad economic news

by DougJ|  October 7, 20102:12 pm| 42 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Everyone’s talking about this gloomy prediction from Goldman’s chief economist:

We see two main scenarios for the economy over the next 6-9 months — a fairly bad one in which the economy grows at a 1½%-2 percent rate through the middle of next year and the unemployment rate rises moderately to 10 percent, and a very bad one in which the economy returns to an outright recession. There is not much probability of a significantly better outcome. The reason is that “short-cycle” factors such as the inventory cycle and the impulse from fiscal policy are likely to continue deteriorating through early 2011, keeping G.D.P. growth very sluggish.

My reading of Hayek suggests that it’s time to put an end to fiat money.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Hayek and the ‘rule of law’
Next Post: The Damage Done »

Reader Interactions

42Comments

  1. 1.

    arguingwithsignposts

    October 7, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    I suspect nobody at G-S will notice a difference, including their “highly respected economist.”

  2. 2.

    Shalimar

    October 7, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    My reading of Bozo the Clown suggests that it’s time for a Tom and Jerry cartoon so everyone can forget their problems for a few minutes.

  3. 3.

    freelancer

    October 7, 2010 at 2:18 pm

    My reading of Hayek suggests that it’s time to put an end to fiat money.

    So is this a sincere pitch for the Amero or a call to boycott European cars?

  4. 4.

    joe from Lowell

    October 7, 2010 at 2:18 pm

    I think you’re a bit confused, Doug.

    Clearly, the best way to avoid slowing growth would be to lay off several hundred thousand public employees.

  5. 5.

    lamh32

    October 7, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    OT, but didn’t someone post about this bill yesterday? Well looks like the Pres won’t be signing it.

    Why President Obama is Not Signing H.R. 3808

  6. 6.

    DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.

    October 7, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    @freelancer:

    Both.

  7. 7.

    kdaug

    October 7, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    Obama’s nuking H.R. 3808

  8. 8.

    Poopyman

    October 7, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    @kdaug: Hardly nuking.
    More of a pocket veto. Plus this:

    The authors of this bill no doubt had the best intentions in mind when trying to remove impediments to interstate commerce. We will work with them and other leaders in Congress to explore the best ways to achieve this goal going forward.

  9. 9.

    evinfuilt

    October 7, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    @kdaug:
    Of course Obama making sure more foreclosures don’t occur (which is against congress’ wish) is more proof of how he’s just as bad as McCain/Bush.

    What? You say this is a good thing, but that’s against the narrative that says Obama will rollover for big biz every day, every time.

  10. 10.

    FlipYrWhig

    October 7, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    If only there was some sort of institution that had a lot of money and could loan it to businesses and individuals. It would take money that had been banked and make investments with it.

  11. 11.

    lamh32

    October 7, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    @Poopyman:

    a veto is a veto though right, doesn’t really matter what concillatory language is used to save face for all the people including Dems who voted for the bill in the House and Senate

  12. 12.

    Norwegian Shooter

    October 7, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    @DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.: Don’t forget to stop fractional reserve banking.

    Also, too: “impulse from fiscal policy are likely to continue deteriorating” translates to the stimulus package is over and it ain’t coming back.

  13. 13.

    Dennis SGMM

    October 7, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    The part they left out:

    …The reason is that “short-cycle” factors such as the inventory cycle and the impulse from fiscal policy are likely to continue deteriorating through early 2011, keeping G.D.P. growth very sluggish. On the other hand I, and my friends at Goldman Sachs, will continue to be wealthy beyond your dreams of avarice and we’ll do everything in our power to accumulate even more wealth in the coming months no matter what the effects of our actions on “the little people.”

  14. 14.

    Norwegian Shooter

    October 7, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: There obviously are many such institutions, the problem is that businesses and individuals don’t want to borrow money to invest and spend. What’s your problem, don’t you worship Krugman?

  15. 15.

    Rhoda

    October 7, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    @Poopyman: It’s a veto, they’re returning the bill to the house unsigned. That’s what a veto is by definition. And given that Democrats in the senate passed this through and expedited it; he can’t call them out in an election season. Better to just say they had good intentions instead of saying the senate is owned by the banks.

  16. 16.

    MikeTheZ

    October 7, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  17. 17.

    Martin

    October 7, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    We see two main scenarios for the economy over the next 6-9 months — a fairly bad one in which the economy grows at a 1½%-2 percent rate through the middle of next year and the unemployment rate rises moderately to 10 percent

    I would like to propose a piece of legislation:

    Any publicly traded company that is willing to make economic forecasts – whether it’s an investment house or Krugman at the Times – has to provide a parallel economic forecast for their company in identical language. What the revenue/profit forecast for G-S and unemployment outlook for their employees over the same period?

  18. 18.

    Poopyman

    October 7, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    @lamh32: Yeah, it’s more of an “I’m going to forget this ever happened. Now what can you send me that actually, you know, helps people” kind of veto.

  19. 19.

    Face

    October 7, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    This is great news for John McCain.

  20. 20.

    DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.

    October 7, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    @Rhoda:

    Hillary would have done a real veto. Bush would have pounded the podium and said “I will not sign this damn bill.”

    Once again, Dr. Utopia resorts to half measures when bold action is needed.

  21. 21.

    kdaug

    October 7, 2010 at 2:39 pm

    @lamh32: Yeah, he still has to deal with Congress – no need to burn any bridges by being inflammatory about it. But the end result is the same.

  22. 22.

    FlipYrWhig

    October 7, 2010 at 2:40 pm

    Was I too deadpan or something? OK, no sarcasm, what I meant was that Goldman Sachs is an investment bank, so if they’re concerned about the economy, they have the power to, like, do something about it.

  23. 23.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    October 7, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    Here’s what jumps out at me in this: even the bootlicking propagandists of the economic elite are now openly admitting for everybody to see that economic growth and employment are no longer correlated with each other except in the loosest possible sense. In other words, to paraphrase a Carter era headline torn from the newspapers, Wall St. to main street: Drop Dead.

    Everything else is just details.

  24. 24.

    kdaug

    October 7, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: Not while Obama’s in office. They’re going to sit on their money and hope for such a crappy economy in 2112 that the voters blame Obama and they can install another puppet in office.

    Saw a story yesterday somewhere that a number of large companies are using their excess billions to buy back their stock. Not invest in new capital expenditures, not hire people. Just churn the cash.

    This is by design. Brought to you by the Chamber of Commerce.

  25. 25.

    FlipYrWhig

    October 7, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    @kdaug:

    They’re going to sit on their money and hope for such a crappy economy in 2112 that the voters blame Obama

    I’m not looking forward to that hundred-year recession.

  26. 26.

    ChrisS

    October 7, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    The good news is that life is short for the proles.

  27. 27.

    Norwegian Shooter

    October 7, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: If you’re talking to me, I understood perfectly. (But note that you added the second sentence after I replied). My Krugman line was sarcasm.

    As for this comment, GS doesn’t care about the real economy. “Fairly bad” and “Very bad” don’t describe the scenarios for GS’s future profits. Just check their stock price.

    kdaug is partially right, companies are buying back stock, but because that increases their profits, not to “churn cash”, whatever that means.

  28. 28.

    Dennis SGMM

    October 7, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    What nonsense! This country would be on the road to prosperity if we just cut taxes, outlaw unions and pay public sector employees the minimum wage with no benefits (Except for teachers. Teachers would be paid 3/4ths of the minimum wage because they only work nine months out of the year).

  29. 29.

    FlipYrWhig

    October 7, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    @Norwegian Shooter: Oh, I know, they don’t care. But it just seems ironic (or something) for an investment bank to make dire predictions about the economy, when one of the key problems for the economy is (as I understand it) investment capital sitting idle.

  30. 30.

    kdaug

    October 7, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    @Dennis SGMM: The minimum wage is unconstitutional. Haven’t you been paying attention?

  31. 31.

    kdaug

    October 7, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    @Norwegian Shooter: By “churn cash”, I mean keeping it out of the real economy. Not hiring, not investing. Just hoarding it.

    For political reasons.

  32. 32.

    Sentient Puddle

    October 7, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    @kdaug:

    … crappy economy in 2112 …

    Was that a subtle Rush dig?

  33. 33.

    Dennis SGMM

    October 7, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    @kdaug:
    Absolutely. The imminent return of lifetime indentured servitude should take care of that pesky minimum wage.

  34. 34.

    Norwegian Shooter

    October 7, 2010 at 3:20 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: It’s nothing. The situation is dire, btw, they aren’t spinning. And idle capital is a result of the key problem of the economy (insufficient demand), not a cause. Read Krugman and/or Reich.

  35. 35.

    Walker

    October 7, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    They’re going to sit on their money and hope for such a crappy economy in 2112 that the voters blame Obama

    By that time the Solar Federation will return to resume control.

  36. 36.

    J sub D

    October 7, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    I think we should always rely on the administration’s economic forecasts. No matter who’s in office they are always positive, encouraging, and invariably wrong.

    Housing prices haven’t hit bottom yet. Don’t expect a recovery until they do.

  37. 37.

    kdaug

    October 7, 2010 at 3:27 pm

    Stupid keypad, putting the zero so close to the one without considering my fat thumbs. Bad keypad!

  38. 38.

    Bob L

    October 7, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    So Goldman Sach shorted the market and they are pissed it is going up?

  39. 39.

    Bob L

    October 7, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    @kdaug: you’re being paranoid; large corporations care about one thing only, the stock of the executive staff. The buy backs will continue as long as CEOs see it as the easy way to get their personal portfolio up for the new super yacht.

  40. 40.

    John Bird

    October 7, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    Well, at least we know that if he’s making this statement now, the twenty-somethings at Goldman have been hard at work betting against American recovery in various ways for the last quarter. And then they will spend that money on $1,500 cocktails at a club that won’t have the likes of you, not on your wretched life, and then within the hour the owner will spend that money on thirty-three kilos of Colombian in the alley out back. The dealer will go missing, the kingpin will give the money to his son for his confirmation, the son will in turn use it to buy Katy Perry. We call that ‘net gain’.

  41. 41.

    DLewOnRoids

    October 7, 2010 at 8:19 pm

    @kdaug: But didn’t you say that companies were buying back billions in stock? That’s the opposite of hoarding cash; they’re sending it to investors who want or need to cash in.

  42. 42.

    goatchowder

    October 7, 2010 at 11:39 pm

    @ThatLeftTurnInABQ: NO not Carter-era, FORD-ERA!

    As someone who lived in said city when it was told to by President Ford to DROP DEAD in huge 1000-point type on the front page of the Daily News, I remember it rather well.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ford_to_City.PNG

    Ford did not do well in 1976 elections. Then again, he wouldn’t have been expected to anyway. Which is why he couldn’t give a shit whether we lived or died.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • pieceofpeace on Open Thread (Anyone Up for a Balloon Juice Zoom on Saturday Evening?) (Mar 31, 2023 @ 7:19pm)
  • Comrade Misfit on The Funniest Thing About All of This (Mar 31, 2023 @ 7:18pm)
  • RaflW on Why won’t What’s-Her-Name mention You-Know-Who? (Mar 31, 2023 @ 7:18pm)
  • Betty on Good News Open Thread: That’s A Big Boy (Mar 31, 2023 @ 7:17pm)
  • Anoniminous on War for Ukraine Day 401: The Bucha Summit (Mar 31, 2023 @ 7:14pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!