• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Everybody saw this coming.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

This really is a full service blog.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Let there be snark.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2010 / One Small Piece of Good News

One Small Piece of Good News

by John Cole|  October 12, 201012:33 pm| 48 Comments

This post is in: Election 2010

FacebookTweetEmail

The people of Delaware have decided they don’t want to ride on the crazy train. (*WARNING* .PDF) I’d take Coons off the ActBlue page, but I’m not taking ANYTHING for granted.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « No Rest for the Wicked
Next Post: If only Alf Landon had run as a real conservative »

Reader Interactions

48Comments

  1. 1.

    ricky

    October 12, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    Proving Karl Rove to be wrong is not sufficient motiviation for you?

  2. 2.

    DCPlod

    October 12, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    Why does Delaware hate witches?

  3. 3.

    Mudge

    October 12, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    I say give all illegal aliens citizenship and deport the 1/3 of the Delawareans who believe O’Donnell is qualified to be a Senator.

  4. 4.

    WereBear

    October 12, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    A breath of sane air?

    I expect that from Delaware. I’m pleased.

  5. 5.

    cleek

    October 12, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    i expect she’ll be haunting our lives for many years to come. she’s perfect for FoxNews.

  6. 6.

    TR

    October 12, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    @Mudge:

    I say give all illegal aliens citizenship and deport the 1/3 of the Delawareans who believe O’Donnell is qualified to be a Senator.

    That might be too harsh, but the 3% who say they’re voting for her to be their senator but say she’s not qualified to be a senator … yeah, they should be deported.

  7. 7.

    The Pale Scot

    October 12, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    Please, a warning when the link goes to a PDF. Some computers are working on other stuff besides surfing

  8. 8.

    cat48

    October 12, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    He came across well when Rachel featured him. Smart and we do need superbrains in the Senate.

  9. 9.

    Sentient Puddle

    October 12, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    On the topic of 2010, Ron Johnson invoked Atlas Shrugged in the debate last night.

    If this douche gets elected, I’m holding all of you assholes from Wisconsin personally responsible.

  10. 10.

    John Cole

    October 12, 2010 at 12:44 pm

    @The Pale Scot: Sorry, I forgot. I updated it :)

  11. 11.

    Legalize

    October 12, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    Breaking: Delaware voters not bug-fucking nuts! Mostly!

  12. 12.

    Gravenstone

    October 12, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    @Sentient Puddle: I’m voting against his proudly ignorant ass. Sadly, I am but one voice. Hopefully the People’s Republic of Madison, Deepest Darkest Milwaukee and the CWD Corridor (SW WI) will hold true to their blue and come out in enough numbers to offset the spreading wingtard tide.

  13. 13.

    JPL

    October 12, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    @Sentient Puddle: I read the article. Any chance Feingold talked about the lack of regulations helping investment banks almost driving us over a cliff?
    Even Greenspan has changed his tune about regulations.

  14. 14.

    b-psycho

    October 12, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    I wonder how many polls showing support for female wingnuts coming overwhelmingly from men have to come out before Chris Matthews stops acting like women just vote for the vagina…

  15. 15.

    Nimm

    October 12, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    I’m kinda surprised her support isn’t at the Maniac Plateau; i.e., 27%.

    Doesn’t speak too well of Delaware, although since it’s just 38%, they only have an extra 1 in 10 loons.

  16. 16.

    Bubblegum Tate

    October 12, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    @cleek:

    she’s perfect for FoxNews.

    Maybe…how much do you get paid for being a guest on Hannity?

  17. 17.

    arguingwithsignposts

    October 12, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    It was hilarious listening to a Tea Partier this weekend talk about how O’Donnell was closing the gap against Coons while I’m sitting looking at a Pollster.com composite index showing that she’s nowhere near close. Keeping my fingers crossed.

  18. 18.

    Dennis SGMM

    October 12, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    OT: Why the fuck are people still using bloated pdfs which necessitate opening a bloated app to read them when most word processing apps now have an option to save a document as HTML? The format may have been a great idea back in the day but, then so were scribes.

  19. 19.

    BottyGuy

    October 12, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    My fellow americans remain stupid. 10% of Republicans seem to think O’Donnell is unqualified by plan on voting for her anyway. Men are particularly stupid, with about have voting for her. As a man I think I’m close to supporting an amendment repealing male voting rights, 50% of us are dick heads.

  20. 20.

    MacsenMifune

    October 12, 2010 at 1:24 pm

    Hey thats the college I went to, I didn’t know they had a polling Institute.

  21. 21.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 12, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    In other contests:

    DCCC says they have 75 close races for the House.

    And, of course, they are concentrating resources on those races.

  22. 22.

    Punchy

    October 12, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    @Sentient Puddle: I never figgy’d Wisky to be so illogical. Peeps in da ‘Kee and MadTown are fun, rather pragmatic (read: leaning progressive) people. Find it hard to believe that central and northern Wisconsin can deliver enough votes for the teatard. What’s GB’s tilt? I’d hafta guess that’s more pink than purple. Maybe we can link Brett Favre to this bagger and have the whole thumb vote blue.

  23. 23.

    Bob L

    October 12, 2010 at 1:34 pm

    Pretty amazing she even gets the support she does. Political philosophies aside she is a really weak candidate: sure you can be a political neophyte but the candidate should be successful at something in their lives. From what I have read about here is she gets elected to the Senate it would be the first grown up job she’s had in her life.

  24. 24.

    El Cid

    October 12, 2010 at 1:35 pm

    @Dennis SGMM: I used to hear that it was much harder to edit PDF’s or use the data without credit. These days, probably not.

  25. 25.

    lol

    October 12, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    @Linda Featheringill:

    Howard Dean would be concentrating resources in all 435 races if RAAAAAAAAAAHM and Obama hadn’t sold us out.

  26. 26.

    BenA

    October 12, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    What’s really insane is that she’s no less qualified than any number of candidates the GOP is running who are much more likely to get elected. She just had the “misfortune” of running in Delaware

  27. 27.

    BenA

    October 12, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    @Bob L:
    Sounds a lot like George W. doesn’t it? Palin? Maybe she should have run for Gov. of a red state before seeking a national office…

  28. 28.

    Sentient Puddle

    October 12, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    @Dennis SGMM: First reason is that with a PDF, you know exactly how it will be displayed on any machine. No differences in how browsers handle HTML or users futzing with settings or whatever.

    Second reason would be that if the document is originally meant to be a print document, then it’s easier to throw the PDF up on the web instead of trying to adapt it to a browser window.

    Whether or not these can be considered good reasons is an open question, but in my experience with dealing with PDFs vs. HTML formats, these are the kinds of considerations that come up.

  29. 29.

    BenA

    October 12, 2010 at 1:56 pm

    @Sentient Puddle:
    As a developer who makes these sort of trade offs and decisions all the time… I’d say you’re 100% right on both accounts. Saving a document as a HTML document produces something that probably wont work consistently on a lot of different browsers… and PDFs are MUCH better when it comes to producing documents that are intended to be printed.

    Also PDF viewers don’t have to be bloated and horrible. There’s really no reason why it should be any more painful than viewing a web page. Adobe’s are bloated and horrible… but there are lots of third party ones that are very nice.

  30. 30.

    bk

    October 12, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    This just in.

  31. 31.

    b-psycho

    October 12, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    @Dennis SGMM: Here‘s a reader that isn’t bloated. I haven’t used Adobe in years.

  32. 32.

    gnomedad

    October 12, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    Wow, look at the gender gap, particularly on O’Donnell. Makes me embarrassed to be male. Guys, wake up! She already said she won’t have sex with you!

    Also, more people favor her than think she is competent?

  33. 33.

    Medicine Man

    October 12, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    I like this nuance (which strangely never gets pointed out in the media):

    Q12: Favorable/Unfavorable rating of the Dems in Delaware — 43%/50%.

    Q13: Favorable/Unfavorable rating of the Repubs in Delaware — 40%/52%.

    Q14: Favorable/Unfavorable rating of the Tea Party in Delaware — 36%/56%.

    So I wonder how long it will take for the media to notice that people don’t like *any* politicians right now, especially the more loony ones?

  34. 34.

    4tehlulz

    October 12, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    @Dennis SGMM: Sumatra PDF is a lightweight reader.

  35. 35.

    The Grand Panjandrum

    October 12, 2010 at 2:07 pm

    So we are all safe to continue masturbating?

  36. 36.

    James Hare

    October 12, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    @Dennis SGMM:
    PDF includes the fonts used in the document so you have a little more control over how it is presented. Adobe Reader is a bloated piece of garbage, but there are alternatives. Macs have Preview (which should mean you never install Adobe, but that’s too much for some people to manage). Linux PCs have a similar program. For Windows I like FoxIt Reader. It’s lightweight and loads faster than Adobe Reader.

  37. 37.

    PaulW

    October 12, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    The thing that bothers me: O’Donnell is still, after all the crazy stuff and the falsified resumes and the general ineptitude, getting 38 percent of likely voters. Just where the hell is she even getting that many people to vote for her?

    Answer to my own question: from the simple fact that there will ALWAYS be a vast number of Republicans who will dutifully punch the ballot for the GOP even if the party puts up a dead armadillo as a candidate. I know well enough that there are Democratic voters who think the same way (all D all the time), but somehow the majority of Dems always seem to realize when a candidate is a terrible choice.

    And this is where the Tea Party jihad and Club for Greed takeovers of the primary system is killing us. Because the Republicans are half of the two-party system that dominates our elections, all the crazies have to do is win in the primaries being as far-wingnut as possible and then not even care about the general election where they can coast to possible victories by A) keeping the fanbase stirred up, B) keeping the Independents confused, and C) keeping the Democratic voters too depressed to turn up to vote.

  38. 38.

    Smith

    October 12, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    Let’s be honest here, no woman (unless she’s bugnuts) is voting for O’Donnell. Her only votes are coming from horny middle-aged (or older) teabaggers who see her as masturbation material. If she looked like Rosie O’Donnell she’d be in negatives, hell she probably wouldn’t even have gotten within sniffing distance in the primary.

    It sucks to say this but nowadays looks matter more than substance. These days FDR, Teddy Roosevelt, hell even Reagan couldn’t get elected nowadays because they wouldn’t pass the “hottie” test.

  39. 39.

    YellowJournalism

    October 12, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    @gnomedad:

    Also, more people favor her than think she is competent?

    So she really is Palin 2.0: Less Wrinkles, More Satan!

  40. 40.

    debbie

    October 12, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    @cleek:

    I look forward to the Fox Cat Fight she’ll have with Palin over who gets to hold the microphone.

  41. 41.

    Cacti

    October 12, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    Considering Delaware has a Cook PVI of D +7, the fact that O’Donnell is down 19 should be considered nothing less than a thorough rebuke of teabagger-ism.

  42. 42.

    Martin

    October 12, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    Can we please now get people to stop talking about O’Donnell and start talking about Republicans that can actually win the seat? Democratic strategists shouldn’t have the same objectives as SNL writers.

  43. 43.

    Bubblegum Tate

    October 12, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    And one small piece of humor: How Americans see Europe.

  44. 44.

    Dennis SGMM

    October 12, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    Than ks to all who took the good time and trouble to respond to my rant about pdfs.

  45. 45.

    Chris G.

    October 12, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    Other potentially good news: The latest round of revelations about Ken Buck may be hurting him. Go to Pollster.com, click on the Colorado Senate race chart, and set it to high sensitivity. Buck’s numbers are going down, while Michael Bennet’s are slowly going up.

  46. 46.

    chopper

    October 12, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    @Sentient Puddle:

    god, this would be like the third time i’d link to that bob the angry flower bit about atlas shrugged, this week.

    “my opponent thinks the only people in this country who do any work are rich dudes who only know how to pay other people to invent new alloys!”

  47. 47.

    Hal

    October 12, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    The thing that bothers me: O’Donnell is still, after all the crazy stuff and the falsified resumes and the general ineptitude, getting 38 percent of likely voters. Just where the hell is she even getting that many people to vote for her?

    Didn’t Allan Keyes, the crazy male version of O’donnel get 27% in Illinois? There are always some people willing to vote for the obviously insane.

  48. 48.

    Smurfhole

    October 13, 2010 at 11:59 am

    I believe Delaware natives already pointed out that she has a snowball’s chance in Hell of getting elected.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • David 🌈 ☘The Establishment☘🌈 Koch on Late Night Open Thread: Sam Bigly Fraud Bankman-Fried, Still Grinding His Grifts (Mar 30, 2023 @ 1:53am)
  • piratedan on Late Night Open Thread: Sam Bigly Fraud Bankman-Fried, Still Grinding His Grifts (Mar 30, 2023 @ 1:48am)
  • Steeplejack on Late Night Open Thread: Sam Bigly Fraud Bankman-Fried, Still Grinding His Grifts (Mar 30, 2023 @ 1:26am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on I’ll Never Get Used to It (Mar 30, 2023 @ 1:20am)
  • HumboldtBlue on Late Night Open Thread: Sam Bigly Fraud Bankman-Fried, Still Grinding His Grifts (Mar 30, 2023 @ 1:14am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!