• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

Optimism opens the door to great things.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Do we throw up our hands or do we roll up our sleeves? (hint, door #2)

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. keep building.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

They want us to be overwhelmed and exhausted. Focus. Resist. Oppose.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Dear Washington Post, you are the darkness now.

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Politicans / David Brooks Giving A Seminar At The Aspen Institute / The first set of investigations

The first set of investigations

by DougJ|  October 19, 20106:42 pm| 92 Comments

This post is in: David Brooks Giving A Seminar At The Aspen Institute

FacebookTweetEmail

There’s a bunch of new polls showing Democratic Senate candidates doing better (Sestak, Conway). Who knows how much stock to put in any of it, but it wouldn’t surprise me if Democrats do a bit better than expected in Senate races, because of just how shitty a lot of the Republican candidates are.

Let’s suppose Dems win a few tight Senate races, but Republicans take the House. You know what happens next, House investigations into how ACORN and the New Black Panther Party stole all those Senate races for Democrats. Even the liberal Nate Silver said Sestak would probably lose, how do you account for these irregularities in inner-city Philadelphia, etc.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Thug life
Next Post: But You Know That No Matter What You’ll Never Get The Chance To Touch »

Reader Interactions

92Comments

  1. 1.

    El Cid

    October 19, 2010 at 6:45 pm

    You mean, they’re not going to choose to look forward, and not back?

  2. 2.

    Lev

    October 19, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    Sharron Angle’s campaign seems to be falling apart. Her illegal immigration ad and the crazy comments about how the ad was about illegal Canadian immigration and how Hispanics look like Asians to her is such a dense and baffling array of racism. Her cash advantage over Reid is nonexistent anymore–wouldn’t be surprised if Reid wins by a decent margin.

  3. 3.

    BR

    October 19, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    Fortunately, that won’t last long – GOPers running for preznit will be falling over themselves to take extra wingnutty positions and attacking each other. The Obama administration and Dems will only be a rhetorical foil – the real foils will be each other.

  4. 4.

    Martin

    October 19, 2010 at 6:48 pm

    Voters deciding to not cheat on their wife, no matter how hot the crazy girl coming on to them is?

    Maybe.

  5. 5.

    Cat Lady

    October 19, 2010 at 6:48 pm

    Democrats lose when they lose, and lose when they win. Republicans win when they win, and win when they lose. Thanks liberal media!

  6. 6.

    RSR

    October 19, 2010 at 6:48 pm

    Don’t tease the black panther!

  7. 7.

    chopper

    October 19, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    i hope this doesn’t come back to bite me in the ass, but it looks like the tea partiers, with regard to this election, hit the high water mark a bit early.

  8. 8.

    JWL

    October 19, 2010 at 6:54 pm

    While we’re at it, why not pretend the democratic party represents a bona fide opposition to the GOP?

    I just might be able to weather the shit hitting the fan when the nation hits rock bottom. So fuck it, bring it on.

  9. 9.

    JPL

    October 19, 2010 at 6:55 pm

    OT..BJ’s ActBlue site needs only 26 more donations in order to reach 500 donations overall. Wahoo.

  10. 10.

    Tonal Crow

    October 19, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    Somewhat OT: While totebagging today, I heard an interviewee begin a sentence with “No less a person than David Brooks said….” If I had been drinking coffee, it would have been all over the windshield.

    I suggest that phrase as a new key-term denoting an appeal to a badly-substandard authority as if he or she were a qualified authority. A sample usage is, “No less a person than James Inhofe says that human-origin climate change is a scam devised by liberals to bring communism to America!”

  11. 11.

    JPL

    October 19, 2010 at 6:58 pm

    @JWL: Well to Mr. I got mine so fuck the rest of you, there are 270 million folks that can’t survive.

  12. 12.

    kdaug

    October 19, 2010 at 6:58 pm

    OT: Fun times.

    Let’s throw a trade war into the mix, shall we?

  13. 13.

    Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle

    October 19, 2010 at 7:00 pm

    @RSR: I am surprised no one has gotten this yet.

  14. 14.

    Adam Lang

    October 19, 2010 at 7:00 pm

    Yup, probably. And assuming that’s the case, we better be on our guard, because, as with everything else that they’ve falsely accused us of doing, we will later find out they’re doing it.

  15. 15.

    Lev

    October 19, 2010 at 7:00 pm

    David Brooks: the Jacqueline Suzann of journalism.

  16. 16.

    Midnight Marauder

    October 19, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    Even the liberal Nate Silver said Sestak would probably lose, how do you account for these irregularities in inner-city Philadelphia, etc.

    Nate Silver has been pretty horrid in his analysis of the Sestak-Toomey race. It’s weird why he’s been so reluctant to recognize the pretty obvious fact that momentum has been swinging Sestak’s way for quite some time, and that Sestak has always done a phenomenal job of closing out his campaigns on a strong note.

  17. 17.

    Bob L

    October 19, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    A cynical minded person might be driven to observe the Dem surge is from these pollsters pulling a Rasmussen and switching from servicing the media narrative to making sure their polls resemble the election results.

  18. 18.

    BR

    October 19, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    @Bob L:

    Good point – I had forgotten about that issue.

  19. 19.

    Nick

    October 19, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    The question is, will Glenn Greenwald say “There might be some truth to this, let’s let them investigate”

  20. 20.

    BR

    October 19, 2010 at 7:04 pm

    @Nick:

    Nah, he won’t. Obama’s not on the ballot.

  21. 21.

    DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.

    October 19, 2010 at 7:07 pm

    @Midnight Marauder:

    I wasn’t trying to slag Nate Silver (I just read that Nick Denton article and now I can’t stop using the word “slag” — sorry), I’m just waiting for them to bring him up.

  22. 22.

    DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.

    October 19, 2010 at 7:08 pm

    @Nick:

    They love Sestak. If Blanche Lincoln somehow pulls it out, though…..

    (not that there’s any chance of that happening)

  23. 23.

    Nick

    October 19, 2010 at 7:09 pm

    @DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.:

    They love Sestak

    Let’s see how long that lasts.

    I give it to Groundhog Day before the first “Senator Sestak is a sell out” diaries pop up.

  24. 24.

    Bubblegum Tate

    October 19, 2010 at 7:10 pm

    @Lev:

    wouldn’t be surprised if Reid wins by a decent margin.

    I would–if Reid wins, it’ll be close. And, of course, the GOP will demand an investigation into just how many brown-skinned people voted for him.

  25. 25.

    Bob Loblaw

    October 19, 2010 at 7:12 pm

    @Nick:

    You and eemom need to seriously get a life. This is getting creepy.

    And yes, Democrats will do fine in the election. Their losses will look a lot like 1982, very manageable overall. Obama will sleepwalk to victory in 2012 even if (when) the economy is still a basketcase. Y’all sweat the small stuff too much.

  26. 26.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    October 19, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    DougJ@top,
    After what happend to the senate seats in IL and MN back in 2008/09, what makes you think any of the newly elected Dem senators will even be sworn in and seated before say, the summer recess in 2011?

    My bet is the GOPers flat out stonewall the seating of any Dem whose margin of election was even remotely close. And any attempt to force the issue will cause Jimmy D. and his henchmen to shut the Senate down completely.

  27. 27.

    Alex S.

    October 19, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    The House is the problem, I don’t believe that the Senate ever was. The threat of a switching Joe Lieberman is not that big anymore, now that the Dems are going to end up with more than 50 seats. I can’t wrap my head around a Senator Rand Paul, so I really believe that Conway is going to win. The Dems will definitely lose North Dakota, Arkansas and Indiana. If they can keep all the other seats – Feingold and Sestak are the biggest question marks, and in my opinion, the only ones – they can claim a huge success. It will allow them legislation via reconciliation by a good margin.
    However, all of this means nothing if the Dems lose the House and the power to fund and defend their achievements of this Congress. The House campaign arm has been very successful so far, with the exception of the doomed Hawaii special election. I suspect that the GOTV efforts are effective and money is being well-spent. But the fundamental disadvantage is quite great. It is going to take one more push into the Democratic direction to keep the House, maybe Jon Stewart’s rally, or surprising economic news (unlikely)…there’s got to be some other nationwide development.

  28. 28.

    Ken

    October 19, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    Besides, Nate Silver isn’t liberal; he’s accurate. They’re easy to confuse, because of the well-known liberal bias of reality.

  29. 29.

    Nick

    October 19, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    @Bob Loblaw:

    You and eemom need to seriously get a life. This is getting creepy.

    Does mocking St. Glenn hit a nerve?

  30. 30.

    arguingwithsignposts

    October 19, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    Even the liberal Nate Silver…

    Has even the liberal DougJ turned on the darling of the GOS stat wunderkinds?

  31. 31.

    Midnight Marauder

    October 19, 2010 at 7:14 pm

    @DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.:

    I wasn’t trying to slag Nate Silver (I just read that Nick Denton article and now I can’t stop using the word “slag”—sorry), I’m just waiting for them to bring him up.

    I would argue you should slag Nate Silver when it comes to this race.

  32. 32.

    Adam Lang

    October 19, 2010 at 7:17 pm

    @Bob L:
    Good thing there’re none of those around here, huh?

  33. 33.

    Steve

    October 19, 2010 at 7:17 pm

    Is Diebold the ACORN of the left, in the sense of being the all-purpose bogeyman for election losses? I heard cries of DIEBOLD!!! after the 2008 New Hampshire primary, for heaven’s sake.

    I suppose there are differences, like (1) there are actually good reasons to be concerned about electronic voting, and (2) Democrats in Congress aren’t actually that interested in blaming everything on Diebold.

  34. 34.

    Bob Loblaw

    October 19, 2010 at 7:19 pm

    @Nick:

    Not anymore so than spammers hawking dating sites and pen1s pills. It’s the unrelenting commitment that I find odd.

  35. 35.

    Ailuridae

    October 19, 2010 at 7:20 pm

    @Bob Loblaw:

    You and eemom need to seriously get a life. This is getting creepy.

    Pot meet kettle.

  36. 36.

    Dennis SGMM

    October 19, 2010 at 7:20 pm

    The GOP has never gotten over the Senate Select Committee to Investigate Campaign Practices (AKA: The Senate Watergate Committee). They never will. The endless bullshit that they ran on Clinton makes it clear that only the blood of a Democratic president will wash away the stain on their honor.

  37. 37.

    DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.

    October 19, 2010 at 7:21 pm

    @Steve:

    Did you really hear cries of Diebold after the 2008 primary?

  38. 38.

    Nick

    October 19, 2010 at 7:22 pm

    @Bob Loblaw:

    It’s the unrelenting commitment that I find odd.

    yeah, I’ve mocked Glenn maybe…twice…in like the past month. It’s interesting you would act like I’m obsessed.

    When the mask falls, it makes quite the thud

  39. 39.

    Dennis SGMM

    October 19, 2010 at 7:23 pm

    @DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.:

    I didn’t hear any cries of “Diebold!” but, I did hear the wind cry “Mary.”

  40. 40.

    Bob Loblaw

    October 19, 2010 at 7:25 pm

    @DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.:

    Given the general mental health level amongst Democratic partisans that primary engendered, I’d be shocked if that claim wasn’t made somewhere.

  41. 41.

    dmsilev

    October 19, 2010 at 7:25 pm

    @ThatLeftTurnInABQ:

    My bet is the GOPers flat out stonewall the seating of any Dem whose margin of election was even remotely close. And any attempt to force the issue will cause Jimmy D. and his henchmen to shut the Senate down completely.

    Fortunately, it’s not in DeMint’s hands. Each state does their own certification of the vote. DeMint can throw a hissy fit about zombie-ACORN or whatever; it won’t matter.

    dms

  42. 42.

    jeffreyw

    October 19, 2010 at 7:26 pm

    Homer does some investigating his own self.

  43. 43.

    stuckinred

    October 19, 2010 at 7:28 pm

    Claire Mc Caskill is walking back her bitching about Conway’s ad on Tweety.

  44. 44.

    freelancer

    October 19, 2010 at 7:29 pm

    @Dennis SGMM:

    but was it before or after all the Jacks were in their boxes?

  45. 45.

    Bob Loblaw

    October 19, 2010 at 7:31 pm

    @stuckinred:

    Conway’s going to win. Never too early to make nice with the next BMOC.

    yeah, I’ve mocked Glenn maybe…twice…in like the past month.

    You’re up to two mentions of his name in this thread alone. I’m thinking your math might not be up to snuff…

  46. 46.

    DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.

    October 19, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    @Bob Loblaw:

    I was an Edwards guy, so I didn’t get so wrapped up in it.

  47. 47.

    stuckinred

    October 19, 2010 at 7:33 pm

    @Bob Loblaw: So what was the point of her being the dem who unloaded on Conway yesterday?

  48. 48.

    Efroh

    October 19, 2010 at 7:43 pm

    OT, but this article re Justice Thomas’s wife lecturing Anita Hill is astounding:

    “Good morning, Anita Hill, it’s Ginny Thomas,” it quoted from the voicemail. “I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology sometime and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband. So give it some thought and certainly pray about this and come to understand why you did what you did. Okay have a good day.”

    The sheer arrogance of this woman.

  49. 49.

    themann1086

    October 19, 2010 at 7:44 pm

    @Nick: Hell, some did before the primary, arguing that we shouldn’t support Sestak because he wasn’t liberal enough, especially on war issues (he supported Obama’s Afghan “surge”, although he also supports a fixed timetable iirc). Of course, ads from the RNSC airing right now say “There’s Left, There’s Far Left, And Then There’s Joe Sestak”. Because he supported a bigger stimulus, the public option, and cap & trade (including video clips of him defending/promoting these three positions). I’m going to be very interested in the exit polling to see how well that sticks. Hopefully it backfires, since the public supported the PO and wants the government to create more jobs, amirite? I hope so…

  50. 50.

    Nellcote

    October 19, 2010 at 7:44 pm

    Considering how the gooper lawyers are gearing up to challenge voters (see TPM) I don’t expect all the results from the election to be in before xmas. Any dems that squeek through a win will be challenged. It’s all about the recounts.

  51. 51.

    Nick

    October 19, 2010 at 7:45 pm

    @themann1086:

    Hopefully it backfires, since the public supported the PO and wants the government to create more jobs, amirite?

    yeah because that’s been translating into votes.

  52. 52.

    Nick

    October 19, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    @Bob Loblaw:

    You’re up to two mentions of his name in this thread alone

    the second one being where I said I only did it twice.

    i know it’s commonplace for when your hero does something stupid and get mocked to accuse the mockers of being “obsessed” or whatever, but often it just makes you look desperate.

  53. 53.

    HRA

    October 19, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    OT – Maybe?

    Miller (R) Alaska used off duty soldiers for security guards.
    They moonlight for a firm called Drop Zone.

    I did wonder about their haircuts when watching the video of them detaining the reporter.

    Really? Active duty US soldiers are allowed to moonlight?

  54. 54.

    Nick

    October 19, 2010 at 7:49 pm

    @stuckinred:

    So what was the point of her being the dem who unloaded on Conway yesterday?

    she was just doing what every other progressive was doing.

  55. 55.

    freelancer

    October 19, 2010 at 7:50 pm

    @Efroh:

    Can only be matched by one other woman I can think of…

    “Good morning, Anita Hill Harry Whittington, it’s Ginny Thomas Lynne Cheney,” it quoted from the voicemail. “I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology sometime and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband. So give it some thought and certainly pray about this and come to understand why you did what you did. Okay have a good day.”

    Oh, wait, Whittington DID apologize. He’s still got birdshot in him too. At least he’s not bitter.

  56. 56.

    Corner Stone

    October 19, 2010 at 7:54 pm

    @Dennis SGMM: It’s funny because I’ve always heard it whispered “Mariah”.

  57. 57.

    Steve

    October 19, 2010 at 7:54 pm

    @DougJ is the business and economics editor for Balloon Juice.: I don’t claim this is more than nutpicking, but see here and here and here and here and here.

  58. 58.

    Michael

    October 19, 2010 at 7:55 pm

    Ginny Thomas is a teabagging *unt. I hate her with the white hot passion of a thousand blazing suns.

  59. 59.

    JPL

    October 19, 2010 at 7:56 pm

    @Efroh: So after 19 years she wants an apology. Hmm, I wonder if anything else is going on here.

  60. 60.

    Mark S.

    October 19, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    @Efroh:

    The best part is Thomas claimed she was extending an olive branch with that message!

    This much is clear: we need Virginia Thomas as a US ambassador. President Palin, make this happen!

  61. 61.

    fitzwili

    October 19, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    @ DougJ
    Believe me – I understand the exasperation but this is potentially good news. It might be a good idea not to frame it as a no matter what happens everything sucks situation. It deflates morale and is not conducive to GOTV. If everything is doomed, why try.

  62. 62.

    Ash Can

    October 19, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    @jeffreyw: Is it just me, or does Homer have big feet? Is he a polydactyl, or is he just going to be the size of Tunch when he grows up? Or both?

  63. 63.

    Tonal Crow

    October 19, 2010 at 8:00 pm

    This blog is like a frictionless Hamsher wheel. Over and over and over and over….

  64. 64.

    Nellcote

    October 19, 2010 at 8:03 pm

    @Efroh:

    Amongst heavy competition, that gets WTF??? of the day.

  65. 65.

    kay

    October 19, 2010 at 8:06 pm

    @stuckinred:

    Claire Mc Caskill is walking back her bitching about Conway’s ad on Tweety.

    He’s a great candidate. Have you listened to him? He’s genuinely talented.
    Rand Paul is outmatched, in just every area. It’s sort of wonderful the Tea Partiers turned it into this big national race.
    I love this : “a lecture in constitutional law from a self-certified ophthalmologist”.
    He’s enjoying himself. He’s just poking Paul’s huge ego with a stick, for fun, then Paul pouts and whines, on cue.

  66. 66.

    themann1086

    October 19, 2010 at 8:09 pm

    I like the story (via GOS) about the GOP running ads telling Latinos not to vote. They’re not even trying anymore are they?

    Univision refused to run the ad.

  67. 67.

    Oscar Leroy

    October 19, 2010 at 8:15 pm

    House investigations into how ACORN and the New Black Panther Party stole all those Senate races for Democrats.

    But–but–look forward, not backward!

  68. 68.

    eemom

    October 19, 2010 at 8:15 pm

    At this point I don’t give a shit if Lollipop or anybody else accuses me of having a weird obsession with Greenwald or Hamsher. Their recent spewings have been so despicable that I’ll just call them as I see them, and take my chances with the devastating wit of Lollipop & co.

  69. 69.

    WereBear

    October 19, 2010 at 8:23 pm

    @Efroh: Keeeeriminy on melba toast. (I’m trying to cut down on the swearing and blasphemy.)

    But that took huge brass balls that have been buried in frozen nerve tissue for a couple of centuries.

    Two points:

    If I were Anita Hill, that would lead to Irish whiskey.

    And

    Perhaps Clarence Thomas is suffering for his sins in ways we cannot see.

  70. 70.

    Bob Loblaw

    October 19, 2010 at 8:25 pm

    @stuckinred:

    Why do Blue Dogs do anything they do? Their entire oeuvre is based on passive-aggression.

    He’s a great candidate. Have you listened to him? He’s genuinely talented.

    He had to resort to talking about secret blasphemy clubs and false idol worshiping to beat a guy who wants to repeal the Civil Rights Act and Medicare. No, he really isn’t that talented.

  71. 71.

    jeffreyw

    October 19, 2010 at 8:30 pm

    @Ash Can: Just you, I think.

  72. 72.

    Paula

    October 19, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    @eemom:

    Well, it’s not a “weird obsession” if you’re merely the negative copy of everyone else’s “weird obsession”. GG/Hamsher are like the Lady Gaga of the lefty blogosphere — they’re thrown in your face so much that you have to react, and that reaction is proportional to the exposure.

    I mean, the last time I looked @ GG (admittedly, it was more than 4 mos. ago) it was as if his entire post was littered with links to other posts that did little more than reiterate something he himself wrote.

  73. 73.

    Ash Can

    October 19, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    @Efroh: I was heartened to see that Hill notified the university authorities, who in turn forwarded Thomas’s message to the FBI. That’s just fucked up.

  74. 74.

    Ash Can

    October 19, 2010 at 8:34 pm

    @jeffreyw: Regardless, he sure is cute. :)

  75. 75.

    Nick

    October 19, 2010 at 8:38 pm

    @Bob Loblaw:

    He had to resort to talking about secret blasphemy clubs and false idol worshiping to beat a guy who wants to repeal the Civil Rights Act and Medicare. No, he really isn’t that talented.

    And that’s his fault? It’s not like he didn’t spend the past three months slamming Paul repeatedly for wanting to repeal the Civil Rights Act and Medicare. If you had been paying attention, that was the gist of his entire campaign. Guess what, didn’t work, Kentucky was ok with that.

  76. 76.

    Midnight Marauder

    October 19, 2010 at 8:44 pm

    @kay:

    He’s a great candidate. Have you listened to him? He’s genuinely talented.
    Rand Paul is outmatched, in just every area. It’s sort of wonderful the Tea Partiers turned it into this big national race.
    I love this : “a lecture in constitutional law from a self-certified ophthalmologist”.
    He’s enjoying himself. He’s just poking Paul’s huge ego with a stick, for fun, then Paul pouts and whines, on cue.

    As a long time member of the Jack Conway Bandwagon, you nailed precisely why I'm such a big fan of his campaign. He knows exactly what Rand Paul is all about and he knows how to make him look consistently ridiculous. Plus, he thoroughly enjoys the task.

    I, for one, am greatly anticipating the Al Fraken/Jack Conway Era.

  77. 77.

    eemom

    October 19, 2010 at 8:48 pm

    @Paula:

    He kind of hit rock bottom for me yesterday when he said that Democrats’ attacks on the Teatards are “overblown,” and cited the Conway ad as an example.

    I just don’t see how even his staunchest apologists could defend that as anything other than pure spitefulness and hypocrisy.

  78. 78.

    Bob Loblaw

    October 19, 2010 at 8:53 pm

    @Nick:

    Guess what, didn’t work, Kentucky was ok with that.

    This would seem to indicate that a candidate’s “talent” is an irrelevant factor in getting elected then. Which, for one, isn’t news, and second, why it’s pointless to try and define talent at all.

  79. 79.

    Dennis SGMM

    October 19, 2010 at 8:55 pm

    @Corner Stone:
    No, no, no: the rain is Tess, the fire is Joe, and they call the wind Mariah….

  80. 80.

    kay

    October 19, 2010 at 8:57 pm

    @Midnight Marauder:

    “Rand Paul has to answer two questions here today” Hah!

    Rand Paul is thinking “I have to do what? I am the FRONT RUNNER!”

    He hones right in on Paul’s almost foppish air of entitlement, and huge ego.

    Conservatives can sound preachy and silly and vain, with all that abstract meaningless nonsense they spout, and Paul is just the prime example of that type.

  81. 81.

    Bob Loblaw

    October 19, 2010 at 9:06 pm

    @eemom:

    You didn’t understand what he wrote. The line about the “accomplished Meghan McCain” should have been a giveaway.

    His point is that Tea Partiers aren’t some new malignancy. They’re the exact same Republicans we’ve seen for forty years. So treating teabaggers as extraordinary whackjobs while allowing “serious” beltway Republicans like McCain and McConnell and whoever to skate by with credibility intact is doing nothing to shift public discourse leftward. They all have the exact same practical designs for the country, especially from a national security point of view, which is what he cares about above all.

    It’s the same position as digby and others on the subject. You can disagree, but don’t act like he’s some tea party sympathizer. That just makes yourself look cheap.

  82. 82.

    kay

    October 19, 2010 at 9:12 pm

    @Bob Loblaw:

    He gave a great speech on the constitution.

    It was basically “we all live in the house FDR built” which Democrats used to run on, before the Federalist Society constitutional interpretation became the only version we all hear.

    There were probably people in that audience hearing that for the very first time, that civil rights legislation and regulatory power are all grounded in the commerce clause. It simply doesn’t get said. No one knows that conservatives have been fighting this same battle since 1937, and that all of these things are hard-won gains that can be lost. He tied it all together.

    Of course the morons in media are going to focus on the ad. The speech was too substantive and truthful.

  83. 83.

    eemom

    October 19, 2010 at 9:29 pm

    @Bob Loblaw:

    No, asshole, it is you who don’t understand. I was responding to a direct quote, which appeared at the end of the post after the “point” you are referring to. Which I also don’t think was made in good faith, but I’m not going to bother explaining that to you.

  84. 84.

    Bob Loblaw

    October 19, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    @kay:

    Great for him. I don’t by any means believe him to be a bad candidate. I suspect that most Democrats who got their starts in politics after 1994 are, and will continue to be, more aggressive in defending Democratic policy nationwide than the older generations against opposition.

    I just don’t think it should take unusual talent to beat the Rand Pauls of the world, and acting like it does can be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

  85. 85.

    Paula

    October 19, 2010 at 9:44 pm

    @eemom:

    Fucking hell, you made me read that column, too!! >: [

    Ok, so the premise is not so much about the teatards as it is about Obama getting support from teabaggers about Afghanistan policy. So by focusing on the teabagger craziness, the media and others are ignoring how in sync Obama and the teabagger candidates truly are.

    So, get that? Obama = Tea Party Candidates

    But in the middle of the argument he has to admit for reality’s sake that the Republicans have been pretty extreme lately and so he drops in that quote from Dick Armey about how the Republicans think that “all of this chatter about post-partisan transcendence and trans-partisan harmony and the like is so inane,” and that “Republicans have made about as clear as possible that even though they’ll pay lip service to ‘bipartisanship,’ they don’t actually want that.” and Greenwald himself wrote earlier that “Republicans aren’t interested in ‘bipartisanship’ except to the extent that they can force Democrats to enact their policies even though they have only a small minority thanks to being so forcefully rejected by the citizenry.” Also, mentioning this is helpful in reminding the reader how ineffective Obama has been in changing the culture of Washington, because of course that’s why everyone wanted to vote for him, right? Everyone who voted for Barack Obama did it for the exact same reasons, and that reason is going to be alarmingly similar to what the MSM said we voted for — never mind that GG is usually circumspect in regards to the MSM.

    Now apparently, the POV that leads him to write that the Tea Party agrees with Obama sees no connection between what Obama has to deal with in regards to the Republicans as GG himself described them, who in this particular post are disambiguated from the Tea Party extremism so that “Obama’s Afghanistan Policy” somehow sprung up like Athena from Zeus’s brain and stands alone for the Tea Party to “agree” or “disagree” with.

    Suffice it to say: LOLZ to this column. It appears subtle but it’s about as sharp (and about as useful) as a blunt pair of scissors.

  86. 86.

    jwb

    October 19, 2010 at 9:50 pm

    Went OfA call banking tonight. All call posts were full, and for awhile there were people waiting in line to make calls. Morale was high. The people I talked to on the phone were pissed—at the Goopers. For what it’s worth, I don’t really have the sense that the base is unmotivated.

  87. 87.

    Bob Loblaw

    October 19, 2010 at 9:52 pm

    @eemom:

    He’s not fucking Proust or something. His point, which was self-indulgent as he so often is, wasn’t that complicated.

    It wasn’t support for the teabagger cause, it was another broadside against the Obama terror policies. Because if these teabaggers are all so very insane, then why doesn’t that insanity transcend to their unqualified support for said terror policies, which have “serious” backing among both the far-right and the left in this country. And why shouldn’t that give liberals pause?

    It’s snarky, absolutist, and a massive false equivalence. It was a terrible, irrelevant column. It wasn’t hypocritical though. Greenwald simply hates everybody at this point, except for maybe Bernie Sanders and Russ Feingold (if that). He has no allegiances and no sides, he wants to see everybody taken down because that’s how strongly he believes they’ve overreached. It’s him (and the ACLU) against the world.

    He is not a person who can affect public policy in any way. You don’t need to be so afraid of him.

  88. 88.

    Paula

    October 19, 2010 at 9:52 pm

    @Paula:

    Should read : “Now apparently, the POV that leads him to write that the Tea Party agrees with Obama sees no connection between the ongoing Afghanistan question and what Obama has to deal with in regards to the Republicans as GG himself described them

  89. 89.

    Chris G.

    October 19, 2010 at 10:04 pm

    I am going to suggest that perhaps the tightening at the Senate level generally reflects the fact that many of the GOP Senate candidates are truly horrible, unappealing candidates. Guess what? So are lots and lots of the GOP’s House candidates. The movement towards the Dems in WV and PA and CO and KY and WI and even MO and NC may be indicative of something that, generic ballot be damned, is going on at the level of individual House races. Keep in mind that it’s all but unheard of for a party to take over the House but not the Senate, and that the Senate is looking much, much better than it was a few weeks ago.

  90. 90.

    Chris G.

    October 19, 2010 at 10:07 pm

    @kay: I couldn’t get over how badly Paul came off in that debate, between the waving and voice cracking and the canned responses. These are not the reactions of a candidate shrugging off an attack he knows is a baseless one (like Blumenthal on investigating the WWE from his debate with McMahon) or even a candidate confident in his ability to respond (like Dubya and his line about being young and irresponsible when he was young and irresponsible). This is a guy about to snap.

  91. 91.

    JAHILL10

    October 19, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    @jwb: Thank you for all that you did and do!

  92. 92.

    bob h

    October 20, 2010 at 7:27 am

    Egged on by Palin and the Teatards, the Republican House will do one or all of the following as a demonstration of zealotry:

    a) Trigger a US treasury default by refusing to raise the debt ceiling.

    b) Interfere legislatively with the operations of the Federal Reserve.

    c) Shut down the government.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - BarcaChicago  - Off the Gunflint Trail/Boundary Waters 8
Image by BarcaChicago (7/11/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • chopper on Friday Afternoon Distraction Open Thread: Get the Passport Stamped with All the Right Signals… (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:06pm)
  • No One You Know on Open Thread: ‘Look, Everyone Dies’ (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:05pm)
  • Steve LaBonne on Friday Afternoon Distraction Open Thread: Get the Passport Stamped with All the Right Signals… (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:04pm)
  • ExPatExDem on Friday Afternoon Distraction Open Thread: Get the Passport Stamped with All the Right Signals… (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:03pm)
  • Martin on Immigration Open Thread: ICE Is Wearing Out Its Welcome (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:03pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!