• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

After roe, women are no longer free.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Everyone is in a bubble, but some bubbles model reality far better than others!

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Ah, the different things are different argument.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Let’s finish the job.

Republicans in disarray!

This blog will pay for itself.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Sports / By rule, this is a fifteen yard penalty

By rule, this is a fifteen yard penalty

by DougJ|  November 14, 20102:56 pm| 145 Comments

This post is in: Sports, We Are All Mayans Now

FacebookTweetEmail

Even though the guy who runs it seems to be some kind of a winger politically, I really love the blog “Dan Shaughnessy Watch”, dedicated to mocking Boston Globe columnist Dan Shaughnessy. Today’s excerpt (it requires no extra mocking) will warm the hearts of Steelers fans and make everyone else want to vomit:

The Steelers are football.

The Steelers are the NFL.

[…..]

If you have been to Pittsburgh to watch the Steelers, you know exactly what I am talking about. If you’ve never been, maybe you’ve picked it up just by watching on TV. Pittsburgh is simply the cradle of the NFL.

The Steelers are about continuity, excellence, toughness, and tradition. They are football’s comfort food. You see the logo on the right side of the helmet and you know you are watching the NFL at its best.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « NFL Open Thread
Next Post: Open Thread: A Million Little (Would-Be) Madoffs »

Reader Interactions

145Comments

  1. 1.

    KG

    November 14, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    Reminds me of the slurping of St Louis Cardinals fans as the Best Fans In Baseball ™. But I suppose this is the nature of sports punditry.

  2. 2.

    jc

    November 14, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    For the record, most of us from Boston think Shaughnessy’s a complete ass. I don’t need polling either. He’s considered an ass.

  3. 3.

    Yutsano

    November 14, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    Jaysus H Christ on a Triscuit, please don’t show this column to my co-worker. He’s from Pennsylvania, thinks everything there is God’s gift to sport, and would go off for hours. Then again he’s a former Marine with hair down to the middle of his back, so he’s just interesting period.

  4. 4.

    Mark S.

    November 14, 2010 at 3:18 pm

    The Steelers were arguably the L.A. Clippers of the NFL for the first 40 years of their existence. To call them the “cradle of the NFL” (whatever that means) is just ignorant.

  5. 5.

    Steve

    November 14, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    “What I wouldn’t give right now to put my hands under Mike Webster’s butt just one more time.” –Terry Bradshaw

  6. 6.

    Susan Ross

    November 14, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    Dan Shaughnessy’s only criteria for greatness in any sport is that the team not be one he covers regularly. He’s a provocateur, to say the least.

    He does have Schilling’s number, though. I’ll give him that. one of the funniest columns I have ever read was him mercilessly mocking all the sycophants who at one time were spending every waking moment listening to Loudmouth pontificate over at his 38Pitches blog.

  7. 7.

    Kryptik

    November 14, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    @Mark S.:

    And the Raiders used to be one of the most consistently dominant teams in the NFL. History is funny the way it turns on dimes sometimes.

    Remember, folks, the Islanders used to be a Dynasty once upon a time.

  8. 8.

    ricky

    November 14, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    You see the Dallas Cowboys logo, on the other hand, and you think of creamy flesh and amplified tatas. All the comfort thoughts that make you think women admire you for being a couch potato while watching such manly sport. Admire you and will dance for you if only they were good looking enough.

  9. 9.

    asiangrrlMN

    November 14, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    Ugh. Even if that were my team he were fapping, I would be nauseous.

  10. 10.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    Mark S – arguably? I would be amazed if over that period they were not overwhelmingly the worst team in the league.

    As someone who lived in Canton, Ohio for years, home of one of the original league members the Canton Bulldogs, it especially galls me that he wold hold up a team that is not that close to being the oldest in the league. If any team could claim that it is the Bears.

  11. 11.

    Martin

    November 14, 2010 at 3:33 pm

    Pittsburgh Exceptionalism!

    Having lived in PA for some years, I never thought I’d see the day…

  12. 12.

    ricky

    November 14, 2010 at 3:35 pm

    @Kryptik:

    Dynasty was once in Denver. Gilligan was once the ultimate Islander.

  13. 13.

    Snayke

    November 14, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    God the infatuation with the Steelers is awful.

  14. 14.

    Mark S.

    November 14, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    @Napoleon:

    Yeah, the Bears or maybe the Packers would get that distinction.

    Trivia time: Which team besides the Bears has been in the NFL since its inception?

  15. 15.

    The Grand Panjandrum

    November 14, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    If the Steelers had a Touchdown Jesus they would be the Notre Dame of the NFL.

  16. 16.

    Davis X. Machina

    November 14, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    I think of the Packers, Bears, Browns, Steelers, pari passu. The Lions would get in there if they did anything, ever, in this geological epoch.

    The NewYorkFootballGiants don’t get into that brain-space, and I’m not sure why. They’re old, they have the Mara family, Y.A. Tittle….

  17. 17.

    Sly

    November 14, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    How that sounds to non-Steelers fans:

    The Yankees are baseball.
    __
    The Yankees are the Major League.
    __
    […..]
    __
    If you have been to the Bronx to watch the Yankees, you know exactly what I am talking about. If you’ve never been, maybe you’ve picked it up just by watching on TV. NYC is simply the cradle of of Major League Baseball.
    __
    The Yankees are about continuity, excellence, toughness, and tradition. They are baseball’s comfort food. You see the logo on the front side of the helmet and you know you are watching baseball at its best.

    You may all commence vomiting.

  18. 18.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    Mark S,

    I know its not the Packers, they entered a year later, and the Steelers and Lions were something like 10/12 years later. My gut tells me it is going to be a team that is not in its original city and original name but the best I can come up with is the Giants.

  19. 19.

    Yutsano

    November 14, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    Is it bad form to bait your blog host so blatantly? Inquiring minds want to know!

  20. 20.

    Bostondreams

    November 14, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    I will never forgive this red-headed schmuck for propagating that stupid ‘Curse of the Bambino’ nonsense. For my money, Bob Ryan was always a far superior columnist and sports reporter.

  21. 21.

    Mark S.

    November 14, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    @Sly:

    Fire Joe Morgan used to make fun of a guy they called Hatguy who wrote nothing except Yankee-worshiping columns. I could see him writing something like that.

  22. 22.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    The curly haired boyfriend is one of the worst columnists in the country.

  23. 23.

    Mark S.

    November 14, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    @Napoleon:

    Yeah, they’ve moved around a bit.

  24. 24.

    Davis X. Machina

    November 14, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    @Bostondreams: Bob Ryan wasn’t the wizard at self-promotion that Gammons, or Shaughnessy, turned out to be. Most of his stuff is still pretty good. When he took his first shot at TV, he turned the Celtics beat over to — Dan Shaughnessy.

  25. 25.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    As long as we are doing professional sports franchise trivia my favorite of all time is what two ABA teams that have never fielded a team in the NBA are none the less entitled to a cut of NBA revenues to this day, so in that sense are still active?

  26. 26.

    Jim C

    November 14, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    @Sly:

    It’s just as nauseating if you substitute Cardinals (and I say that as a Cardinals fan, KG), or Red Sox. (I’d say “or Cubs” as well, but then we’d just be being silly.) After all, what’s the metric?

    I may be in a small subset, but I’ve never taken any sort of “fan pride” in being considered one of the “Best Fans.” I’ve never been able to find an online record of it, but I recall a column in the Chicago Tribune some ten years ago wherein the author recounted a recent trip to Wrigley Field. He was sitting right behind the opponents’ bullpen bench – so they were awfully nice seats – and after the game, one of the relief pitchers turned to them as he was leaving and complimented them on being “really good fans.” The author took such pride and self-congratulation from this that I was nauseated. Who cares what the visiting team thinks of your cheering?

  27. 27.

    scarshapedstar

    November 14, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    Respectfully, I must rejoin with:

    WHO DAT

  28. 28.

    Mousebumples

    November 14, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    @Mark S.: As a Packer fan, I must begrudgingly credit both the Bears and the one-time Chicago Cardinals (then St. Louis Cardinals, and now the Arizona Cardinals) joined the NFL in 1920. The Packers, however, have been in existence since 1919 – however, they didn’t join what is now known as the NFL until 1921.

  29. 29.

    jay

    November 14, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    @Mark S.: Not since the merger in 1970, which is when the modern league begins. 6 Super Bowls, 7 AFC championship wins (with 14 total appearances – both are records for AFC teams and Super Bowl wins is an NFL record), 19 division titles, 25 playoff berths, best win-loss record since the 1970 merger, 3 coaches since 1969. You’re telling me your NFL team wouldn’t trade for that consistency, for being a playoff contender year after year???

    What everyone seems to be missing is the merger, which is the marker by which almost everyone judges the modern league. Yes, the old Monsters of the Midway (Chicago) and Packers were awesome. But since 1970…what have they done in the 40 years since the league merger???

    Between 1933-1970 the Steelers were the lovable losers of professional football. But after 1970 they’ve been consistent decade after decade (even the lean years of the 1980’s weren’t terrible compared to the production of other franchises).

    In other words, given what the old great franchises did before 1970 and have done since (not a lot), the Steelers have earned their place among them in regards to the overall history of the NFL.

    It is, of course, hard to compare the two eras since the way the game is played is so different.

  30. 30.

    Jim C

    November 14, 2010 at 4:10 pm

    @Napoleon:
    It’s my understanding that only the Spirits of St. Louis are still entitled to tv money in perpetuity. John Y. Brown and his Louisville Colonels took the settlement money offered and ran.

  31. 31.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 4:10 pm

    Mark S, OK I cheated and looked it up so I will not say what the answer is and give someone else a chance, but like the Steelers and Clippers they are candidates for the ineptitude hall of fame.

  32. 32.

    TheYankeeApologist

    November 14, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    I am a Yankees fan and thus completely biased, but Shaughnessy is the Hawk Harrelsson of sportswriting.

    I am utterly gobsmacked that he has a job. Possibly the worst of all-time. I think he feels like he doesn’t earn his paycheck unless he’s taking the piss out of his own hometown team.

  33. 33.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    Jim C – you are a winner, although I had not heard that about the Kentucky Colonels. As of 10 years ago I had heard that both teams were entitled to something like .5% of TV revenues in perpetuity to merge into the NBA without fielding a team.

    On a related matter it is just amazing how good the ABA teams and players did in those years following the merger.

  34. 34.

    Mousebumples

    November 14, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    @Napoleon: I answered above, and I honestly thought the Packers were among the original founding teams of the NFL … until I visited the NFL Hall of Fame in canton maybe 6 years ago.

    (Although I will concede to checking Wiki to confirm the origins of the Cardinals … I thought they founded as the St. Louis Cardinals, which was not accurate.)

  35. 35.

    Jim C

    November 14, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    @Napoleon: My source is the fabulous Loose Balls by Terry Pluto – an oral history of the ABA, and one the best oral histories I’ve ever read.

    From memory, Brown’s franchise was going to be stripped of its marquee player, Artis Gilmore. Again, if I recall correctly, Brown (the chicken magnate) took his buy-out money and bought the Buffalo Braves (soon to be the San Diego, and later the Los Angeles Clippers). The Spirits owners got their deal mainly because the NBA negotiators were sick of dealing with their persistence on every point, and didn’t foresee just how much money they were coughing up to buy them out.

  36. 36.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    @Jim C: They were the Kentucky Colonels.

    Terry Pluto’s book “Loose Balls” has lots of great Spirits of St. Louis stories featuring Marvin Barnes and/or Bob Costas. Costas once said “Coach MacKinney won’t want a repeat of Friday night’s blow job” during a radio broadcast. It’s probably a good thing few people drove and listened to the Spirits

  37. 37.

    Innocent Bystander

    November 14, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    Say what you will about Dan’s sportswriting…he was a damn good whist partner in college.

  38. 38.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    From wikipedia

    In the end, the NBA agreed to take in four teams—but the Colonels weren’t among them. Although it has never been confirmed, it is likely that the NBA selected the Pacers over the Colonels because Indianapolis was a more lucrative market. However, the Colonels were on far stronger financial footing than the Pacers.

    On July 17, 1976 the Kentucky Colonels ceased to exist as John Y. Brown, Jr. agreed to fold the Colonels in exchange for $3 million. Brown used the money to purchase the Buffalo Braves of the NBA.

    The Colonels players were put into a dispersal draft. The Chicago Bulls took Artis Gilmore for $1.1 million. The Portland Trail Blazers took Maurice Lucas for $300,000. The Buffalo Braves took Bird Averitt for $125,000. The Indiana Pacers took Wil Jones for $50,000. The New York Nets took Jan Van Breda Kolff for $60,000. The San Antonio Spurs took Louie Dampier for $20,000.

    In contrast to Brown receiving $3 million in cash for the Colonels, the Spirits of St. Louis’ owners received $2.2 million in cash along with a 1/7 share of each of the four remaining teams’ television income in perpetuity. That deal has been estimated to have generated over $250 million in the years since.

  39. 39.

    Mark S.

    November 14, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    @Mousebumples:

    You are correct, sir, and here is your Golden Internet, as well as a $0.50 coupon to Luby’s. I did not know that the Packers were formed in 1919.

    @jay:

    I’m not disputing that the Steelers have been the bomb for the last 40 years; I was taking exception to the notion that they are the cradle of the NFL when they were a mediocre franchise for their first 40 years.

  40. 40.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    Mousebumples – missed that, sorry.

    Some more trivia that was triggered by something you say in your post, there is actually a professional football (in the American sense) team that is older then any of the teams you mention or any that has ever had an NFL franchise. What team is it?

  41. 41.

    cathyx

    November 14, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    I don’t see a problem with that quote. Sounds about right.

  42. 42.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    Terry Pluto is a great sports writer. He has a new book coming out that was outtaked in today’s paper – didn’t look at it yet.

  43. 43.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    @Napoleon: CFL is so unfair. Go TiCats. Garney Henley rulez

  44. 44.

    trollhattan

    November 14, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    @Kryptik:

    Yep. Here on the left coast I’m hipdeep in Raiders fans, or at least Raiders-garb-draped goobers, who have to be among the most clueless in sports. “What, they moved to LA?” Good thing for them Al’s a Geeeeenius.

  45. 45.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    Mouseb “I thought they founded as the St. Louis Cardinals, which was not accurate”

    I want to kick myself because I actually knew they were an original team from Chicago. As of 10-12 years ago the Bidwells still owned at least one horse track in Chicago (hawthorne?).

  46. 46.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    @Napoleon: Things I Learned from Watching the Browns?

  47. 47.

    PanAmerican

    November 14, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    I got yer Steagle right here.

    The Browns (and 49ers) came in 1950 after the AAFC collapsed.

  48. 48.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    Bill, CFL is correct but it is not the TiCats.

  49. 49.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    PS, though depending on how you view the TiCats history they are significantly older then any NFL franchise.

  50. 50.

    Tim F.

    November 14, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    Whoo. I need a cigarette.

  51. 51.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    Pan, the Colts came in with them from the AAFC also.

  52. 52.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    @Napoleon: and older than the next oldest team

  53. 53.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    Ok. Can anyone not from Canada name the original NHL teams? One of them is still playing.

  54. 54.

    D-boy

    November 14, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    @Dougj

    Do you read http://kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com/
    They do an excellent fisking of Peter King every week.

  55. 55.

    morzer

    November 14, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    The Steelers are about continuity, excellence, toughness, and tradition. They are football’s comfort food

    Tough comfort food?

    Sounds like a frozen shit burger.

  56. 56.

    MikeJ

    November 14, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    If we’re doing trivia, there’s a non-sports related game up at cleek’s place. Name that tune.

    In the past, winners have always come back and added more answers as they got them over the course of the week. Don’t get down if you don’t know them all at first listen. Download them all and put them on repeat.

  57. 57.

    Cat Lady

    November 14, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    The blog is kind of amusing, and everyone knows Dan Shaughnessy is sort of a douchey asshat, but of all the fuckery afoot, the fact that Roger Bournival devotes his life to parsing every word of a mediocre sports writer’s column says WAY more about Roger Bournival that it does about Shaughnessy. It makes total sense he’s a winger – he’s like that sad pathetic closet case Asst. DA in Michigan Andrew Shirvell. Makes you wonder what’s really motivating him.

    Anyway, Charlie Pierce’s blog is the only must read.

  58. 58.

    Yutsano

    November 14, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    @morzer:

    Sounds like a frozen shit burger.

    White Castle, we hardly knew ye.

  59. 59.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Here are two questions about the American League:

    Who was the last switch hitter to win the AL MVP?
    (The last in MLB was Ken Caminiti in 1996.)

    What American Leaguer hit his 100th home run at the youngest age?
    (Youngest in MLB was Mel Ott.)

  60. 60.

    Chat Noir

    November 14, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal:

    Detroit Red Wings
    Chicago Blackhawks
    New York Rangers
    Boston Bruins
    Toronto Maple Leafs
    Montreal Canadiens

  61. 61.

    morzer

    November 14, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    @Yutsano:

    Made up of gristle, the intestines of missing dogs, random steroids they had lying around the plant, and with a generous helping of sperm from bored day-release convicts…. no, there really is no comparison between the Steelers and a White Castle abomination burger.

  62. 62.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: Vida Blue was the most recent switch hitting AL MVP

    I’m going with Tony Conigliaro for the other

  63. 63.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    @Chat Noir: not the original NHL — the canadiens are the remaining original. But there were like 3 other Montreal teams and the Ottawa Senators (not related to the current team)

  64. 64.

    JenJen

    November 14, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    I just projectile-vomited. No, really.

  65. 65.

    MikeJ

    November 14, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal:

    Who was the last switch hitter to win the AL MVP?

    I think we’ve all heard the rumours about A-rod’s personal life.

  66. 66.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    Chat, I know that the teams that are generally called the original 6 are not in fact the original 6. They are simple the teams left over after the early years when the league settled down into a long term stasis. The Canadians are the only team that was their at the start, but I have no idea who the teams were.

  67. 67.

    Ash Can

    November 14, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal:
    @Chat Noir:

    The “one still playing” tipped me off, and I remembered some old names, so I cheated and looked it up:

    Montreal Wanderers
    Ottawa Senators
    Toronto Arenas

    and, of course, the

    Montreal Canadiens

    ETA: I suppose I have all the non-cheaters cursing me now. Sorry — I’m just no good at sports trivia games.

  68. 68.

    JenJen

    November 14, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: Damn, Chat Noir got to it first. But really, opinons like the one DougJ posted contribute heavily to me becoming more and more of an NHL fan by the day.

    ETA: Oh, wait, I wouldn’t have gotten that right at all. Well done!! And good question!

    ETA 2: And speaking of the Habs, Carey Price’s save in the 3rd period last night was epic.

  69. 69.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    @Chat Noir: The others are correct. The “Original Six” era starts in 1942, when the last of the other teams folded. Others are close. The Canadiens are the only surviving original team, and they were all in Canada. The Ottawa Senators were one. The other two were the Montreal Wanderers and the Toronto Arenas.

    @Bill Murray: You are correct on Conigliaro. Imagine the logjam in that outfield in 1975 if he hadn’t been beaned.

    Edit: And Ash Can beat me to the answer.

  70. 70.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    @JenJen: I’m not sure which DougJ comment you are referring, but welcome aboard. Where do you live?

  71. 71.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    Since the NHL is the only major league in which the championship trophy is older than the league, it lends itself to another trivia question: What was the last non-NHL team to win the Cup, and when was it?

  72. 72.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 5:17 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: I’m pretty sure Vida Blue is correct, although he didn’t win for his hitting abilities given his robust 0.294 OPS+. I played a lot of APBA back then and I definitely remember Vida as a switch hitter.

    For hitters, probably Mickey Mantle was the last switch hitting MVP

  73. 73.

    morzer

    November 14, 2010 at 5:17 pm

    Broncos 35 Chiefs 0, and about 6 minutes to play in the second quarter!

  74. 74.

    JenJen

    November 14, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: Oh, sorry, awkwardly-worded, just meant the Steelers-drool in the OP. I’m not really feelin’ the NFL this year, but that probably has more to do with my hapless Bengals, and my fantasy team. I’m a sore loser.

    Loving the NHL this year, though. The NHL Center Ice free preview on cable through October hooked me good.

  75. 75.

    ThresherK

    November 14, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    If we don’t have an “old extant American football (in CFL) team” yet, I’m guessing the Toronto Argonauts. My memory (which may not be reliable) tells me that Ottawa Rough Riders were older yet, until the wrong guy bought them and ran them to ruin.

  76. 76.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 5:22 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal: I would say the Toronto Blueshirts in 1916, since this team was at the heart of the NHA becoming the NHL

  77. 77.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 5:25 pm

    @Bill Murray: Incorrect. You’re off by a decade.

  78. 78.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    Alternatively, name the first US based team to win the Cup.

  79. 79.

    JenJen

    November 14, 2010 at 5:32 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal:

    Incorrect. You’re off by a decade.

    Then it’s gotta be the Victoria Cougars.

    ETA: Oh, and when was it? Crap. 20’s, for sure but don’t know.

  80. 80.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 5:32 pm

    @Mark S.:

    The Cardinals, the club that actually predates the NFL itself.

  81. 81.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal:

    Hmmm…..Portland Rosebuds or Seattle? I’ll go with Portland.

  82. 82.

    fasteddie9318

    November 14, 2010 at 5:36 pm

    Gosh, sorry our team wins a lot more often than yours…

  83. 83.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 5:37 pm

    ThresherK, correct.

    By the way, that is one reason it POs me that the NFL is rumored to want to move the Bills or start a new team in Toronto. It ought to be offered to a team like the them with all that history.

  84. 84.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 5:41 pm

    Anyone else take note of the Byron “Whizzer” White mention in the Shaughnessy column? White was great at University of Colorado, but kinda meh with the Steelers.

  85. 85.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 5:41 pm

    That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal,

    what is interesting about the Stanley Cup is that technically it is not awarded to the NHL champ, but to that years best hockey team. During the strike year(s?) there was talk about still awarding it to some other hockey team that was playing that year.

  86. 86.

    JenJen

    November 14, 2010 at 5:43 pm

    @Napoleon: Been hearing a lot more about that Bills-moving-to-Toronto thing lately, mostly from my Canadian friends. Wouldn’t that be ridiculous, and wouldn’t it effectively kill off the Argonauts?

  87. 87.

    Yutsano

    November 14, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    @JenJen: Not entirely certain why it would, since Canadian football is a different style from American. The real important question is why would Toronto WANT the Bills?

  88. 88.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    @Napoleon:

    Up until 1947 that would have been true. In ’47 there was an agreement reached between the NHL and the trustees of the Stanley Cup. Here’s a key point in the resolution:

    This agreement shall remain in force so long as the League continues to be the world’s leading professional hockey league as determined by its playing caliber, and in the event of dissolution or other termination of the National Hockey League, the Stanley Cup shall revert to the custody of the trustees.

    The league neither dissolved nor terminated in ’94. Had the trustees of the Cup tried to award the Cup to a team from another league, the NHL would have sued their asses off.

    On edit: I’m a bit off there. Forgot about the ’04-’05 fiasco.

  89. 89.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    @Andy K: well White led the league in rushing 2 of his 3 years and was first team all pro both years. He missed a year during his Rhodes Scholarship between those two years then WW2 started. So it wasn’t exactly meh so much as abbreviated

  90. 90.

    JenJen

    November 14, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    @Yutsano: Well, right, but it’s still easy to see a lot of Argos fans migrating over to the NFL what with all the hoopla and bells and whistles, plus the visiting teams. Because, as you said, the Bills are still a stinky rose by any other name.

    (They did beat Detroit today, but c’mon now, that’s like out-running Oprah to the last piece of cheesecake.)

  91. 91.

    frosty

    November 14, 2010 at 5:50 pm

    @Mark S.: “Cradle of the NFL”. That would be the Baltimore Colts, circa 1958.

    That is all.

  92. 92.

    honus

    November 14, 2010 at 5:51 pm

    @jay: I am of the age that remembers the Steelers as pathetic, but well-loved, and the Pirates as the, well, Steelers of the NL. Not always dominant, but they always hit you.

  93. 93.

    Yutsano

    November 14, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    @JenJen:

    Because, as you said, the Bills are still a stinky rose by any other name.

    I call foul. The stinky rose is a long standing and honorable seasoning. Comparing garlic to the Bills, well, that’s just mean. :)

  94. 94.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 5:56 pm

    @Andy K: It was the Seattle Metropolitans in 1917.

    @JenJen: Correct. It was the 1924-25 Victoria Cougars.

    @Napoleon: There’s some controversy about that. The Stanley Cup trustees gave control of the Cup to the NHL in 1947. According to the agreement, the NHL has the power to determine “the conditions for competition of the Stanley Cup, including the qualifications of challengers, the appointment of officials, the apportionment and distribution of all gate receipts, provided always that the winners of this trophy shall be the acknowledged World’s Professional Hockey Champions.”

    So, the NHL has the authority to declare that only NHL teams can play for the Cup. During the 2004-05 lockout, some enterprising Canadian citizens filed a lawsuit claiming that the 1947 agreement was illegal and that control should return to the trustees. The dispute was resolved when the NHL declared that, if the league did not play in a given season, the Cup would be awarded to someone else. However, they still have the power to change their mind, though that would likely lead to another lawsuit.

    If that were to happen, it would lead to an interesting situation. According to the original dictate written by the Lord Stanley of Preston, the Cup must be taken in a challenge. The NHL may get to write the rules for who is allowed to challenge for the Cup, but nowhere are they explicitly given the power to just take it back when the NHL starts playing again. If it ever happens, it will be interesting to see if, after the NHL playoffs, the winner must then go beat whichever team is holding it.

  95. 95.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 5:56 pm

    Andy K,

    Then obviously the newspaper article I read on the subject was inaccurate. And yes it was during the 04-05 fiasco.

  96. 96.

    honus

    November 14, 2010 at 5:58 pm

    @Bill Murray: Three words: Bullet Bill Dudley, to the Steelers via UVA (like James farrior and Heath Miller) He passed earlier this year. Look up his record.
    Of course back in my day, the Steelers were mainly famous for cutting Pittsburgh native Johnny U. Then there was Steeler and Colt great Big Daddy Lipscomb who, when a doctor put on a rubber glove to give him a prostate exam said “Take that thing off, I’m a Catholic”

  97. 97.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 5:59 pm

    @Bill Murray:

    He played with the Steelers Pirates for one season- his rookie season, 1938. Pittsburgh went 2-9. Meh.

  98. 98.

    joe from Lowell

    November 14, 2010 at 6:02 pm

    Hey, props to the Rooneys. Good family.

  99. 99.

    PanAmerican

    November 14, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    @Yutsano:

    They don’t call ’em sliders for nothin’.

    @Napoleon:

    The Colts folded after 1950 and came back in 1953. You’ll never pass Eddie Simmons’ marriage test.

  100. 100.

    morzer

    November 14, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    @Yutsano:

    Not to mention that garlic is good for your arteries. The Bills, on the other hand….

  101. 101.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    New trivia question:

    Who was the first NFL running back to rush for more than 1,000 yards in each of his first three seasons in the league?

  102. 102.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    @PanAmerican:

    You’ll never pass Eddie Simmons’ marriage test.

    Ah, but how well does Napoleon file an LP collection?

  103. 103.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 6:12 pm

    @Andy K: John Brockington

  104. 104.

    Yutsano

    November 14, 2010 at 6:14 pm

    @morzer: I love it when someone says to me they don’t like garlic. I then make it a point to go as garlic heavy as possible. Me gusta ajo. The Bills? Meh.

  105. 105.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 6:15 pm

    @Andy K: but he did lead the league in rushing and was first team all pro. He also had 29 completions and threw 18 interceptions in 73 passing attempts, so he wasn’t all sweetness and light

  106. 106.

    dr. bloor

    November 14, 2010 at 6:15 pm

    The Steelers are about continuity, excellence, toughness, and tradition. They are football’s comfort food. You see the logo on the right side of the helmet and you know you are watching the NFL at its best.

    Complete with a sexual predator running the offense.

    Ain’t that America…

  107. 107.

    Steeplejack

    November 14, 2010 at 6:16 pm

    @Andy K:

    Jim Brown, probably, off the top of my head.

  108. 108.

    morzer

    November 14, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    @Steeplejack:

    I thought he was under 1,000 yards rushing by a whisker in his first season?

  109. 109.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    @Bill Murray:

    Yeah, but you’ve got to ask why he led the league in rushing (sheer number of carries?) and what the All Pro selection process was like back in 1938. I contend that the sportswriters who made the selections back then just looked at the stats, but rarely saw the games that they weren’t covering live.

    Oh, he scored all of three TDs that year. Yippee.

  110. 110.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    @Yutsano: One of my mottos is, “Not enough garlic.” It’s appropriate to pretty much any situation.

    Boy, the only good late games are the NFC West’s exhibitions of sub-mediocrity. The scores are close, because all four teams are just about equally bad.

  111. 111.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 6:21 pm

    Pan American,

    Loved that movie, and I guess I must have just forgotten that about the Colts

  112. 112.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 6:22 pm

    @Steeplejack:

    Bill Murray got it right: It was my childhood idol, John Brockington of the Packers in ’71, ’72 (the Year of the Running Back) and ’73.

  113. 113.

    jeffreyw

    November 14, 2010 at 6:24 pm

    Comfort food.

  114. 114.

    Steeplejack

    November 14, 2010 at 6:28 pm

    @morzer:

    Yeah, Brockington is correct. I thought it would have been earlier than the ’70s. Shorter seasons, though.

  115. 115.

    JenJen

    November 14, 2010 at 6:28 pm

    @Yutsano: You win. I curse my awkward, unintentional turn of phrase!

  116. 116.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 6:35 pm

    @Steeplejack:

    Shorter seasons, though.

    Certainly one factor. I think the fact that the talent pool had been watered down by expansion over the years had something to do with the bigger stats, too.

  117. 117.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    @Andy K:

    I think the fact that the talent pool had been watered down by expansion over the years had something to do with the bigger stats, too.

    I disagree with this. Not only are athletes bigger, faster and stronger than they used to be, but the US population has grown about as fast as the number of NFL teams. Football may not have the increased geographic draw from foreign countries that baseball, basketball and hockey have, but I’m confident that the talent pool is deeper than it has ever been.

  118. 118.

    Yutsano

    November 14, 2010 at 6:45 pm

    @JenJen: As punishment for your sins, I condemn you to eating one whole roasted head of garlic. With crostini is acceptable as mitigation.

  119. 119.

    Napoleon

    November 14, 2010 at 6:48 pm

    I think you are correct @117. At worse its the same, but more likely the talent pool is deeper.

  120. 120.

    JenJen

    November 14, 2010 at 6:49 pm

    @Yutsano: The Crostini Rule! Thank you for invoking it. :-)

  121. 121.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    @Andy K: actually he scored 4 rushing TDs which was second in the league. White did have ~15% more carries than anyone else, but had ~20% more yards. His 3.7 ypc was 7th in the league. He led the league in yards from scrimmage and all purpose yards.

    The Pirates were really bad offensively, especially at passing. They were mid-league in rushing, although taking out Whizzer’s numbers they averaged about 2.8 ypc.

    He was probably the 4th best tailback in the league out of 10, but easily the Pirates best offensive skill player.

    Whizzer wasn’t the team’s best nickname, though — Scrapper Farrell, Tuffy Thompson, Bull Karcis, and Eggs Manske were all on that team

  122. 122.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 6:54 pm

    @That’s Master of Accountancy to You, Pal:

    Not disagreeing that the population has developed physically, but that doesn’t mean that the the upper echelon of football players isn’t still better than the lower echelons. When you expand by four teams as the NFL and AFL did in 19666-1968 (Atlanta and Miami in ’66, New Orleans in ’67, Cincinnati in ’68), you’re adding 44 new starting positions on defense, as well as subs who are platooned in and out situationally (and, yes, I think this matters more on defense, where the players expend more energy chasing down plays). This causes a drop-off in depth around the league.

  123. 123.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 6:59 pm

    @Andy K:

    And it isn’t just the player talent pool that gets watered down: Coaching staffs get watered down, too.

  124. 124.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 7:05 pm

    @Bill Murray:

    Playing in the old single-wing offense, too, right?

  125. 125.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 7:12 pm

    @Andy K: In addition to the talent pool argument not seeming correct, the structure of offensive football has really changed — teams averaged about twice as many rushes (414, 38/game) as passes (203, 18.5/game) in 1938 and there were no feature backs, who really didn’t come in until the 70s. Now teams average 500 passing attempts (31/game) and 440 rushes (27.5/game). White had ~40% of the Pirate rushes — I doubt any team had that low a percentage for their top rusher last year.

    So 30-50% more games, and feature backs seems the best answers. Depending upon when you date the onset of feature backs, only about 10 of the top-100 and 3-4 of the top-50 are from before the feature back concept

  126. 126.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    @Andy K: I assume so, Sammy Baugh was the top TB in 1938

  127. 127.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 7:15 pm

    @Andy K: In baseball there seems to be a lag time where the standard of play is worse for a few years, but it recovers.

    Also, football now gets a much higher percentage of the best athletes than the did before the 50s-60s.

  128. 128.

    John Cole

    November 14, 2010 at 7:26 pm

    Look, I love Steeler worship, but the cradle of the NFL was Baltimore during the Unitas years. Period.

  129. 129.

    That's Master of Accountancy to You, Pal

    November 14, 2010 at 7:26 pm

    @Andy K: You get talent dilution relative to what would have been without expansion, but you don’t get talent dilution relative to what the league was in the past. It isn’t just that the population is getting bigger and faster, it’s also becoming more numerous. There are discontinuities, since expansion has come in clumps, but the ratio of number of professional football teams to number of people in the US has remained remarkably constant. When the league was originally formed, it had 11 teams and the population was about 105,000,000. In 2010, there are slightly less than three times as many of both.

    As I said, you get discontinuities, particular when the AFL got started in 1960. Overall, though, NFL teams have almost exactly as many people to select their players from as they always have. The talent pool was a little bit deeper than today in the 1950s (12 teams; 150,000,000 in 1950 census), somewhat shallower in the 1960s (23 teams including the AFL; 180,000,000 in 1960 census), somewhat shallower in the 1970s (26 teams; 203,000,000 in 1970 census), and pretty constant since 1980. Population growth has kept up. The talent pool is deeper now than it was in the 1970s.

  130. 130.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 7:36 pm

    @Bill Murray:

    The feature back idea seems to date back to the mid-to-late ’50s. I’m thinking Joe “The Jet” Perry with the ‘Niners, who, though he shared carries with backfield mate Hugh McIlhenny, wasn’t platooned in and out regularly. But the feature back idea was in full swing by the early ’60s, with Jim Brown in Cleveland and Jim Taylor in Green Bay leading the pack.

    Interesting thing here: The position of middle linebacker was created by Tom Landry when he was still the defensive coordinator of the Giants. Before Landry’s 4-3 defense, the regular alignment was a 5-2. But to the point, Landry came up with the 4-3 scheme in order to stop Jim Brown.

    And don’t you think it’s funny that the number of 2,00 yard rushers only doubled from 1 to 2 from Simpson to Dickerson while the number of pass attempts per game rose, but really shot up post-1995 expansion (J-Ville and Carolina that year, Cleveland/B-more in ’99, Houston in 2002)? You’d have thought the number of 2000 yard rushers wouldn’t have shot up incredibly with the rules that unleashed receivers from the bump and run coverages of the earlier ’70s, but as pass-happy as the league has become since the late ’80s, you’d think that the number of rushers who even get to 1,800 yards would have gone down since the ’95 expansions…but, alas…

  131. 131.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 7:49 pm

    @John Cole:

    No it wasn’t.

    It just happened that the Colts beat the Giants in The Greatest Game Ever Played. Had the Giants won the coin flip and the game, would you say that NYC was the cradle of football?

    I’m going with Cleveland in the early Paul Brown era as the cradle of modern pro football. But for the T Formation, Brown was responsible, directly or indirectly, for many of the innovations that make the modern game what it is. And look at the head coaches who either played for or coached under Brown: Shula, Noll, Walsh…And Landry made his name scheming against Brown and Brown and the Browns.

    I’ll give western Pennsylvania credit for creating the first pro football teams- Catholic miners and steel mill workers have a lot of time on their hands after Sunday mass- but you can credit northern Ohio, northern Indiana and northern Illinois as well as southeast Michigan for breeding hard-nosed football players in the first half of the 20th century.

  132. 132.

    ricky

    November 14, 2010 at 8:00 pm

    @Andy K:

    I never knew you were such a young whipper snapper. I like John David Crow because his frozen facial features eloquently depicted the quintessential Aggie who had bitten of more than he could chew.

  133. 133.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 8:09 pm

    @Andy K: well given that Perry never got over 45% of his teams carries. I think Taylor only exceeded 50% of his teams carries once. Brown was certainly a feature back, but really feature backs weren’t common until the 1970s,

    Looking at how often the league leader averaged 20 carries a game as a rough standard, I get approximately

    1932-1952 — 200+ carries — 7 of 26 seasons
    1953-1972 — 240/280 carries — 9 of 30 seasons
    1973-present — 280/320 carries — 33 of 35 seasons

  134. 134.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 8:14 pm

    @ricky:

    I never knew you were so old, Tex.

    Funny, this conversation, because over at C&L my 45 years is considered young. Everyone who has worked at the site for more than a year is older than me except for Logan Murphy and Nicole Belle- but Nicole’s only a few weeks younger than me. Of the newer folks, I know that the delinquent Max Marginal, who’s still too busy touring with Ke$ha to post, is only 30 or 31, and your buddy Madrak and that whip-smart Karoli are both….How should I put this? Femmes d’une certain age.

    And, btw, if you saw me you’d think I’m in my late 20s, so I win there!

  135. 135.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 8:22 pm

    @Andy K:

    And don’t you think it’s funny that the number of 2,00 yard rushers only doubled from 1 to 2 from Simpson to Dickerson while the number of pass attempts per game rose, but really shot up post-1995 expansion (J-Ville and Carolina that year, Cleveland/B-more in ‘99, Houston in 2002)? You’d have thought the number of 2000 yard rushers wouldn’t have shot up incredibly with the rules that unleashed receivers from the bump and run coverages of the earlier ‘70s, but as pass-happy as the league has become since the late ‘80s, you’d think that the number of rushers who even get to 1,800 yards would have gone down since the ‘95 expansions…but, alas…

    I think you would only think that if you were either not being serious, making a strawman argument or knew nothing about football. Making passing easier means that defensive players are going to have more responsibility in pass coverage which in general is going to lead to less run defense focus and hence the feature back has a greater likelihood of gaining more yards. And of course 29 of the top 50 highest and 64 of the top 102 single season carries have happened in that time.

  136. 136.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 8:22 pm

    @Bill Murray:

    Hmmm…

    1973-present—280/320 carries—33 of 35 seasons

    And two of the best teams from that era- the ’73 Dolphins and the mid/late ’80s ‘Niners split the carries pretty evenly between their backs, iirc. But maybe I don’t rc that Craig/Rathman tandem.

    well given that Perry never got over 45% of his teams carries. I think Taylor only exceeded 50% of his teams carries once. Brown was certainly a feature back, but really feature backs weren’t common until the 1970s,

    Ah, okay, I was thinking of featured back meaning someone who was shuffled in and out regularly, as it had been in the ’30s and ’40s, when three or four backs would all get about equal time and carries.

  137. 137.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 8:30 pm

    @Bill Murray:

    I think you would only think that if you were either not being serious, making a strawman argument or knew nothing about football. Making passing easier means that defensive players are going to have more responsibility in pass coverage which in general is going to lead to less run defense focus and hence the feature back has a greater likelihood of gaining more yards. And of course 29 of the top 50 highest and 64 of the top 102 single season carries have happened in that time.

    The argument I hoped you’d make…So why not a huge uptick in rushing stats between the time the more modern pass defense rules were implemented in the ’70s and the next set of 2,000 yard runners in the late ’90s-00s? You’d think that, say, Earl Campbell, Marcus Allen, Walter Payton (imo, best football player I saw play- but Jim Brown had retired) or Billy Sims (in a healthy season) would have made legit runs at 2,000 yards.

  138. 138.

    Andy K

    November 14, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    @Andy K:

    I was thinking of featured back meaning someone who wasn’t shuffled in and out regularly

    Fixed.

  139. 139.

    S. cerevisiae

    November 14, 2010 at 8:36 pm

    I met a cougar from Victoria once – ahh Michelle I hope you have done well.

  140. 140.

    Bruce (formerly Steve S.)

    November 14, 2010 at 8:51 pm

    You see the logo on the right side of the helmet stripes on the jersey and you know you are watching the NFL WWE at its best.

    Fixed.

  141. 141.

    Bill Murray

    November 14, 2010 at 9:09 pm

    @Andy K: Because carries did not go up enough to get to 2000. You need 400 carries at 5 ypc to get to 2000; 363 carries at 5.5 ypc. 363+ carries are about 50% more common in the post 1995 era.

    eta: Also, the changes were cumulative so the initial changes moved the typical high from ~1200 to ~1500 and then the next change moved this higher. The closer the average season is to the limit the more likely an exceptional season is to exceed your arbitrary limit

  142. 142.

    honus

    November 14, 2010 at 9:23 pm

    @Yutsano: Read Marilyn Monroe’s stuffing recipe in the NYT today. Joe DiMaggio refused to eat garlic.

  143. 143.

    honus

    November 14, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    @Andy K: yeah, no players from Western Pa. Unitas, Montana, Marino, Kelly, Namath. The toughest guy in Chicago is from Pittsburgh, Mike Ditka. Sam Huff is from jut down the road in Fairmont, and Jim Brown was from Long Island, but all the really tough players are from Indiana and Michigan.

  144. 144.

    ThresherK

    November 14, 2010 at 10:42 pm

    @Napoleon: Moving the Bills from Buffalo would mean we could no longer call that locale “a drinking town with a football problem”.

    If they want a name in Toronto that isn’t from a rowing club (!), I have an idea.

  145. 145.

    Andy K

    November 15, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    @honus:

    The toughest guy in Chicago is from Pittsburgh, Mike Ditka.

    Butkus? Nitschke? Both from Chicago.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Political Action

Postcard Writing Information

Recent Comments

  • JaneE on Let’s Hear It for the Young Pups in the House! (Sep 28, 2023 @ 6:05pm)
  • mrmoshpotato on Let’s Hear It for the Young Pups in the House! (Sep 28, 2023 @ 6:04pm)
  • Suzanne on Thursday Evening Open Thread: TFG’s (Predictably) Fake ‘Union Autoworkers’ Audience (Sep 28, 2023 @ 6:03pm)
  • WaterGirl on Thursday Evening Open Thread: TFG’s (Predictably) Fake ‘Union Autoworkers’ Audience (Sep 28, 2023 @ 6:03pm)
  • Tony G on Mortality and education disparities (Sep 28, 2023 @ 6:01pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!