• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Consistently wrong since 2002

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

This fight is for everything.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

In my day, never was longer.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

This blog will pay for itself.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / An Unexamined Scandal / No one could have predicted…

No one could have predicted…

by Dennis G.|  November 22, 20101:10 pm| 33 Comments

This post is in: An Unexamined Scandal, Getting The Band Back Together, Assholes, Good News For Conservatives

FacebookTweetEmail

that one of the first acts of the Republican controlled 112th Congress will be to gut Ethics laws and the ability of outside groups to file ethics complaints against sitting Members of Congress.

Steve Benen is out with this bit of unsurprising news this morning:

HOUSE GOP QUIETLY EYEING ETHICS OFFICE FOR ELIMINATION…. [snip]

Most voters have probably forgotten all about this, or for those who do remember GOP corruption, at least hope Republicans won’t go back to their nefarious ways. But just a few weeks after the midterm elections, one of the first orders of business appears to be Republicans quietly eyeing the elimination of the Office of Congressional Ethics.

Despite publicly promising more transparency and disclosure of the inner workings of Congress, behind closed doors, the GOP leadership has made moves indicating the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) may be targeted for cuts or extinction. [snip]

It’s not surprising, of course, that some Republicans would want to scrap the office; one assumes arsonists would want to shut down fire departments, too. But the effort, if it proceeds, should send quite a message to voters about GOP priorities — the party promised to change the way Congress operates, but voters may not have realized that meant making it easier for representatives to get away with ethics violations.

When Democrats took control of Congress four years ago one of the first things they did was to put in place a stronger and more independent ethics process. A key aspect to it was the OCE and it has worked (see Rangle, Charlie). Without the OCE we will return to the days when it was almost impossible to launch an ethics investigation of a Member of Congress. It is not a surprise that the incoming Party of Grifters would want to shut that down as a first step, especially as so many members of the Republican caucus have exposure on ethical issue. In the last four years they were out of power and so nobody really cared about the skeletons in their closets. Now that they are taking over again they will make sure that even if something does come out they can kill it quickly. These grifters learned a lot from the Abramoff/DeLay era and the chief lesson was to always sweep things under the rug and delay/obstruct any investigation.

And so the OCE had to go. I expect they will replace it with the new Office of Investigations of Democrats and Minorities (OIDM) so they can still claim to be concerned about ethics. Also, too, they will most likely work to have this guy fired.

Cheers

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « They Start Young
Next Post: I Don’t Think Holding the Line on Marginal Tax Rates Will Cut it With this Crowd »

Reader Interactions

33Comments

  1. 1.

    LGRooney

    November 22, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    If we had a real press corps, I would be much less alarmed at this development. Alas…

  2. 2.

    WyldPirate

    November 22, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    Maybe the Rethugs can hire a bunch of new UCF BSchool grads to serve as staffers for the new “Office to Investigate Ethical Lapses by Democratic Congressmen Only”.

  3. 3.

    Chris

    November 22, 2010 at 1:18 pm

    Basically a microcosm of their overall strategy. Shutting down the ethics panel so they can get away with unethical behavior = shutting down the government (“drowning it in a bathtub” specifically) so the robber barons can get back to running the country without any check on their power.

  4. 4.

    El Tiburon

    November 22, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    Ethics, like facts, have a well-know liberal bias.

    Get used to hearing this phrase repeated like a billion times:

    Stop criminalizing Politics!

  5. 5.

    LGRooney

    November 22, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    @WyldPirate: Won’t happen. You’d have to have at least one honest, hard working person on the staff so the others would know what to do. As such, “honest” and “hard working” will rule out anyone who votes the “right” way and, if we have learned anything from GOP rule over the past 2-3 decades, they don’t trust anyone who doesn’t agree with them.

    And, yes, I just said that they only trust those that are untrustworthy.

  6. 6.

    Jamie

    November 22, 2010 at 1:20 pm

    what do they say in a Baltimore Pittsburgh Football game? Just let them play!

  7. 7.

    Dennis SGMM

    November 22, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    @El Tiburon:

    When politics is criminalized, only criminals will become politicians.

    Whoops: too late.

  8. 8.

    Mnemosyne

    November 22, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    @El Tiburon:

    Stop criminalizing Politics!

    The best part is, they will be screaming that as Darrell Issa conducts his investigation into the Obama administration making a job offer to Joe Sestak if he agreed not to run for Senate.

  9. 9.

    Quiddity

    November 22, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    I’m sure David Broder will pen a stern op-ed decrying this move by Republicans.

  10. 10.

    Joseph Nobles

    November 22, 2010 at 1:24 pm

    Pay-go will be next.

  11. 11.

    Dennis SGMM

    November 22, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    Why do I have the feeling that “gate” will become a suffix for nearly everything that has taken place in the administration since January, 2009?

  12. 12.

    ChrisNYC

    November 22, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    This has been known for weeks. Right after the election, Boehner said he’d close the office. Why liberal blogs haven’t picked it up until now, I have no clue. It’s a perfect contrast — the Dems pursue ethics charges while the GOP closes the office. And, Rangel’s violations were not corruption so there’s so little political risk. The worst part about the fight on the left is that the GOP just sails along unopposed.

  13. 13.

    Brachiator

    November 22, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    that one of the first acts of the Republican controlled 112th Congress will be to gut Ethics laws and the ability of outside groups to file ethics complaints against sitting Members of Congress.

    Well, I guess you could call this “smaller government.”

    Sometimes I fell as though I am watching democracy unravel. The strangest thing is that many of “the people” (especially the Tea Party People) are not only cheering it on, but actively participating in the demolition.

  14. 14.

    Nick

    November 22, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    @LGRooney:

    If we had a real press corps, I would be much less alarmed at this development. Alas

    Clearly, if Obama would use the bully pulpit

  15. 15.

    Jamie

    November 22, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    @Brachiator:

    this country has already become a plutocracy.

  16. 16.

    Dennis G.

    November 22, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    @Quiddity:
    True, but only after he hears about it when he checks in with the telegraph office for the latest news. It will take a while to decipher those dots and dashes, so you can not expect Broder to pick up on this until summer at the earliest.

    But when he does it will be a barn burner of a column.

  17. 17.

    burnspbesq

    November 22, 2010 at 1:31 pm

    @ChrisNYC:

    Rangel’s violations were not corruption

    So? Even assuming I agree with that statement, reporting and disclosure rules are the key to any system designed to deter corruption. It’s the Al Capone theory of law enforcement.

  18. 18.

    El Cid

    November 22, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    The main problem with the Abramoff scandal is that it was investigated and received attention. Had that not happened, a major scandal could have been avoided.

  19. 19.

    Sophist

    November 22, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    So let me get this straight — the republican agenda is basically:

    1. Tax Breaks for Rich People
    2. Gutting Social Security
    3. Impeaching Obama for, uh, you know, something. Whatevs.
    4. Firing the people that make sure they don’t steal candy from babies or sell Yellowstone to Suriname

    Am I getting this right?

  20. 20.

    Annelid Gustator

    November 22, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    PUMA alert! Clinton throws self under the bus. PUMA twins unite! Shape of a[n] idiot!

  21. 21.

    Dennis G.

    November 22, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    @El Cid:
    Yep, that is the lesson that was learned.

  22. 22.

    Maude

    November 22, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    @Annelid Gustator:
    She said that when she was in the Senate about running for president.

  23. 23.

    El Cid

    November 22, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    @Annelid Gustator: On this past Friday’s KPFA (Berkeley’s) Morning Show, an interview was played with Max Blumenthal, among other things author of Republican Gomorrah, which added recent studies of authoritarian personalities and manipulation on the right to more recent Republican and TeaTard and Talibangelical movement.

    One of the interesting pieces of data was that Democratic primary voters who voted for Hillary Clinton were much more likely to have authoritarian personalities. I can’t at the moment find the exact minute / second this was presented in the 2 hour show.

  24. 24.

    ChrisNYC

    November 22, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    @burnspbesq: Hold up. I’m no big fan of Rangel. I think he should have gone on trial and his conduct in the process was pretty horrifying. But, please, Rangel’s violations are in a completely different ballpark than use of office for personal gain, i.e. vote selling, which was at the heart of a lot of the GOP problems last time they were in. There was no allegation that Rangel violated his trust with his constituents by legislating in a way that benefited himself, rather than them. Sure, disagree, but I think that’s what most people in this country consider the real problem. That’s why I think there’s not much political risk to using his trial as a comparison.

    From what I know of the Waters case, the allegations there are pretty textbook use of office for personal gain.

  25. 25.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    November 22, 2010 at 2:46 pm

     

    These grifters learned a lot from the Abramoff/DeLay era and the chief lesson was to always sweep things under the rug and delay/obstruct any investigation.

    So the GOP evolution in a nutshell is:

    In the WH, from Nixon to Cheney.
    In the Congress, from Tom Delay to ???

    honestly, I’m not sure that Mr. Oompah Loompah is really up to the level of evil necessary to make this work. I’ll give odds that he is replaced by somebody with less brains and even more ideological fervor within the next 4 years.

  26. 26.

    themann1086

    November 22, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    Thanks, I’ll be sending this to my dad. He’s a conservative who votes Dem periodically and usually splits his ticket cause he’s mostly about local issues and hates incumbents. It’s his major blind spot that throwing out some incumbents usually just serves to empower even worse incumbents…

  27. 27.

    debbie

    November 22, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    I look forward to the day that voters who voted for a “new way” wake up and see that they’ve enabled the same crooks who got where we are today. It’s sure to be ugly.

  28. 28.

    jayjaybear

    November 22, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    @Dennis G.:

    Oh, good…I’m not the only one who hears T. Herman Zweibel when I read Broder…

  29. 29.

    Dennis G.

    November 22, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    @jayjaybear:

    ● ▬ ▬ / ● ● ● ● / ▬ ▬ ▬

    ● ▬ ▬ / ● ● ● ● / ● / ● / ● ● ▬

    ▬ ● ● / ● ● / ▬ ● ●

    ▬ ● ▬ ▬ / ▬ ▬ ▬ / ● ● ●

    ● ● ● / ▬ ● / ▬ ● ▬ ▬

    ▬ / ● ● ● ● / ●

    ● ● ▬ ● / ● ● / ● ● ● / ● ● ● ●

    ● ▬ ▬ / ● ▬ / ● ● ●

    ● ▬ ● ▬ / ● ▬ / ● ● ▬ / ▬ ▬ ● / ● ● ● ● / ▬

  30. 30.

    Emerald

    November 22, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    @Nick:

    Clearly, if Obama would use the bully pulpit

    Obama doesn’t have a bully pulpit. The media has taken it away from him.

    He can give all the speeches he wants to give, make all the statements he wants to make. They will decide what gets publicized, if anything.

  31. 31.

    Paris

    November 22, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    Obviously, the voting public doesn’t care about an ethics office and they probably aren’t interested in pay-go. They just know that as soon as democrats got the majority, all their taxes went up so Queen Nancy could abuse her position and demand a private Air Force jet to ferry corrupt lobbyists to the left coast and back.

    It was probably a waste of effort for the Democrats to try to act responsibly and professional.

  32. 32.

    PWL

    November 22, 2010 at 4:44 pm

    Well, the Repubs always want to go back to the Good Old Days…..so why not return to the glorious days of 2003, when Jack Abramoff and Tom DeLay and Randy Cunningham (among others) were having so much fun?

  33. 33.

    Quiddity

    November 23, 2010 at 1:45 am

    @Dennis G.: I forgot all about the telegraph office. Yup, that’s where he gets his news. Thanks for reminding me.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Deputinize Eurasia from the Kuriles to St Petersburg on Proud to Be A Democrat: Alvin Bragg Is Not Here for the GOP’s Performative Outrage (Mar 27, 2023 @ 3:40pm)
  • planet eddie on Self-Care Sickness Open Thread (Mar 27, 2023 @ 3:39pm)
  • Redshift on Proud to Be A Democrat: Alvin Bragg Is Not Here for the GOP’s Performative Outrage (Mar 27, 2023 @ 3:39pm)
  • Ruckus on What the Hell Is Happening In Israel? (Mar 27, 2023 @ 3:38pm)
  • Betty Cracker on Proud to Be A Democrat: Alvin Bragg Is Not Here for the GOP’s Performative Outrage (Mar 27, 2023 @ 3:38pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!