• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Trump’s legal defense is going to be a dumpster fire inside a clown car on a derailing train.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Don’t expect peaches from an apple tree.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

If you are in line to indict donald trump, stay in line.

Putin dreamed of ending NATO, and now it’s Finnish-ed.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

This fight is for everything.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Fani Willis claps back at Trump chihuahua, Jim Jordan.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Everybody saw this coming.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / And it stoned me just like geloio

And it stoned me just like geloio

by DougJ|  December 29, 20103:50 pm| 79 Comments

This post is in: General Stupidity, Going Galt

FacebookTweetEmail

I think we’re more of a plutocracy or oligarchy since the ridiculous don’t really rule so much as they just eat up attention (at least in Paul Ryan’s case), but I still like this idea, from Paul Krugman.

The whining from the banksters about Obama not kissing their asses is truly ridiculous. I do think it’s mostly from higher ups, I’ve never heard any friends in finance mention this, and they do spend a lot of time complaining about the government (mostly that they don’t think regulation is done properly in practice).

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Feel the birthmentum
Next Post: Moore Nominee Update »

Reader Interactions

79Comments

  1. 1.

    The Bobs

    December 29, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    I’d bet anything that Jamie Dimon is one of the whiners.

  2. 2.

    General Stuck

    December 29, 2010 at 3:54 pm

    This is all so goddamn confusing. Didn’t Kos his self arrive here yesterday to proclaim Obama is kissing the banksters asses and will become a one term presnit? Haven’t our resident firebaggers been saying the same thing? And now, well, not quite true, and Obama didn’t actually meet with them. And they are actually all butthurt because he isn’t treating them so hot.

    Tell me again someone, what good is the netroots?

  3. 3.

    MikeJ

    December 29, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    Weren’t the same bankers proud of being assholes back when they were making more money?

  4. 4.

    cat48

    December 29, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    At least 2 of them should be treated badly….the 2 who just couldn’t make it to the WH meeting last year b/c it was foggy. Since the president has a healthy ego himself, I can’t see him “groveling at their feet” as Kos & FDL seem to think he does.

  5. 5.

    Gordon, The Big Express Engine

    December 29, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    O/T – but anyone catch Tucker Carlson’s comments about Michael Vick?

  6. 6.

    DougJ

    December 29, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    @Gordon, The Big Express Engine:

    Yeah, what a nut.

  7. 7.

    Violet

    December 29, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    @General Stuck:

    Didn’t Kos his self arrive here yesterday

    Here? He did? Guess I missed that.

    Awesome thread title.

  8. 8.

    joe from Lowell

    December 29, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    They banksters of the 30s didn’t appreciate Roosevelt for saving their asses, either.

    Fuck ’em. FDR and Obama didn’t save capitalism out of a deep-seated concern for spoiled assholes.

  9. 9.

    Scott P.

    December 29, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    Didn’t Kos his self arrive here yesterday to proclaim Obama is kissing the banksters asses and will become a one term presnit?

    I missed this. Which thread?

  10. 10.

    kdaug

    December 29, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    Three words: “Eisenhower Tax Rates”.

  11. 11.

    Cat Lady

    December 29, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    Can we stone the banksters while they’re goin’ home? kthx.

  12. 12.

    General Stuck

    December 29, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    @Scott P.:

    This one

  13. 13.

    General Stuck

    December 29, 2010 at 4:10 pm

    Opps, screwed that one up = deleted

  14. 14.

    Jack

    December 29, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    Personally, I think the term “plutarchy” fits best our current regime. (Read the entire first sentence to get the full meaning, note it encompasses plutocracy and oligarchy)

  15. 15.

    licensed to kill time

    December 29, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    @Cat Lady: Maybe then they wouldn’t feel so all alone.

  16. 16.

    Nellcote

    December 29, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    DougJ

    Yer title looks like a mash up of “stoned me to my soul” and “G-L-O-R-I-A”.

  17. 17.

    PS

    December 29, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    @kdaug: Agreed!

  18. 18.

    DougJ

    December 29, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    @Nellcote:

    And it stoned me just like Jelly Roll.

  19. 19.

    SGEW

    December 29, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    What’s wrong with “kleptocracy”?

  20. 20.

    Steeplejack

    December 29, 2010 at 4:19 pm

    @DougJ:

    Damn it. Now I’m wondering where my copy of Moondance is. Haven’t listened to that one in a long time.

  21. 21.

    freelancer

    December 29, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    Awww Fuck! HERE go again.

    Wishing death upon your political enemies isn’t kosher –even if your words are dripping with sarcasm, you’re riffing off an old Dave Weigel quote, and you’re targeting someone as loathsome as Bill Kristol. Is that such a crazy standard to keep?

    Don’t want to disrupt the comity of the Atlantic blog.

    Taibbi from Griftopia:

    Looking back now, what I experienced in the wake of the Goldman piece was a lesson in a subtle truth about class politics in this country.
    Which is this: you can pick on the rich in an ironic Arrested Development sory of way, you can muss Donald Trump’s hair, you can even talk abstractly about class economics using clinical terms like “income disparity.” But in our media, you’re not allowed to just kick the rich in tthe balls and use class-warfare language. The taboo isn’t so much the subject matter. The taboo is the tone. You’re allowed to grimace and shake your head at their shenanigans, but you can’t call them crooks and imply that they haven’t earned their money by being better or smarter than everyone else, at least until they’ve been indicted or gone bankrupt

    Read “serious” for “rich”.

  22. 22.

    Nellcote

    December 29, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    @DougJ:

    ouch! that was stretchy!

  23. 23.

    Villago Delenda Est

    December 29, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    @SGEW:

    Traditionally, a “kleptocracy” was used to describe third world hellholes usually run by strongmen with high melanin counts. Zaire being a pretty good example of same.

    So we can’t use that term for this country.

    However, the parasite overclass is working hard on transforming this country into a third world hellhole. Give them a little more time.

  24. 24.

    The Dangerman

    December 29, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    Tax them until they cry (literally; I want real tears, not any fake saline shit).

  25. 25.

    Villago Delenda Est

    December 29, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    @The Dangerman:

    Um, they’ll cry if you increase their taxes by 50 cents.

    I’m afraid we’ll need to go well beyond crying to start making amends.

  26. 26.

    Mnemosyne

    December 29, 2010 at 4:26 pm

    @SGEW:

    I don’t think “kleptocracy” encompasses the batshit insanity of believing that Ayn Rand was a serious economist. Or an economist of any kind, really.

  27. 27.

    MattR

    December 29, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    @Gordon, The Big Express Engine: The closing paragraph from the AP report perfectly nails Carlson’s real issue.

    Carlson, a conservative commentator, is angry that Obama told Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie he believes people who have paid for their crimes should have the opportunity to contribute to society again.

  28. 28.

    Michael D.

    December 29, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    O/T – but if anyone is looking for Judith Miller, she’s over at NewsMax.

    A perfect match, to be sure.

  29. 29.

    DougJ

    December 29, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    @Nellcote:

    They sort of rhyme, don’t they?

  30. 30.

    Barb (formerly Gex)

    December 29, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    Oh, regulation is done improperly. Maybe because one side of the political spectrum has made regulation a dirty word. We can only remove regulations these days. No one wants to add some. People in finance are the ones who prevent proper regulation. That’s how they stick their hand in the national till. I’d have trouble being friends with people like that. You’re a better person than I.

  31. 31.

    Mike Kay (True Grit)

    December 29, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    poor tucker, he’s such a failure.

    even vasts amounts of wingnut welfare can’t turn a sow’s ear into a slick purse.

  32. 32.

    SGEW

    December 29, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est; @Mnemosyne:

    I just meant the very literal “rule by thieves.”

  33. 33.

    Brachiator

    December 29, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    @MattR:

    Carlson, a conservative commentator, is angry that Obama told Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie he believes people who have paid for their crimes should have the opportunity to contribute to society again.

    You know, if only the banksters had paid for their crimes, they might have earned a second chance to contribute to society again.

    @DougJ: Keeping up with the song title wordplay,

    What’s so funny ’bout peace, love and oligarchy!?

  34. 34.

    Violet

    December 29, 2010 at 4:39 pm

    @Mike Kay (True Grit):

    poor tucker, he’s such a failure.

    He really is. He was even voted off first on Dancing with the Stars. He’s a pathetic failure.
    @General Stuck:
    Thanks. I guess I was busy when Kos came to visit. Looks like it was an entertaining thread. In an annoying way.

  35. 35.

    Villago Delenda Est

    December 29, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    @SGEW:

    Yeah, I know, but our Galtian overlords can’t be thieves. They just can’t. To state that baldly is to…well, state it baldly and it might hurt their fee fees.

  36. 36.

    Southern Beale

    December 29, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    The whining from the banksters about Obama not kissing their asses is truly ridiculous.

    Yes, it is. And while I know this will get me labeled an Obama hater from some folks here (and I’m not, just a thoughtful critic. I do give credit where it’s due), I found this post from Ed at Gin And Tacos particularly interesting.

    I’ll just cut to the chase and quote the final graf:

    In essence the Obama presidency thus far has proven that We can win if and only if big business has no dog in the fight. When it does, all bets are off. The President can continue trying to convince people to celebrate the fact that he can sink six-inch putts and kick extra points as though doing so is a great accomplishment. Alternatively, he could find enough of his balls to actually fight and perhaps even win a battle against meaningful opposition. Standing up to Maggie Gallagher, Fox News, and the other neanderthals who fly into a rage over gays in the military is one thing. Standing up to the elites who run this country is quite another.

    The problem we have is that no one in power is standing up to the oligarchs and plutocrats. That means the banksters, the insurance titans, the oil barons, the masters of corporate hegemony. The few who do are quickly written off as fringe wackos.

    And maybe what we on the left need to be doing is ask how, devoid a voice in Washington, we take these folks on. What’s the best way to go about it?

  37. 37.

    DougJ

    December 29, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    @Barb (formerly Gex):

    No, in that the people who carry out the regulation aren’t paid enough so they do a crappy job and the regulations don’t get enforced.

  38. 38.

    Delia

    December 29, 2010 at 4:44 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    I don’t think “kleptocracy” encompasses the batshit insanity of believing that Ayn Rand was a serious economist. Or an economist of any kind, really.

    Or a good writer for that matter.

  39. 39.

    MattR

    December 29, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    Sorry for more off-topicness but this quote from Christine O’Donnell’s campaign spokesman, responding to reports that she is under federal investigation for using campaign funds for personal reasons, is just too good not to share. What liberal boogeymen is he missing?

    “The anonymous source seems politically-motivated and may well be tied to the ultra-liberal, George Soros-financed, former Sen. Biden staffer-run CREW [Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington] complaint,” Moran said.

  40. 40.

    ChrisS

    December 29, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    @General Stuck:
    “And they are actually all butthurt because he isn’t treating them so hot.”

    Yeah, because they have everything they want and they can just shut up and go home and cry themselves to sleep on their giant piles of money.

    Or they’re greedy and never stop. Just like how all those republicans needed more time to consider the healthcare reform bill and needed to be treated better. The democrats caved and gave them some facetime. And then they went and voted against it anyway while promising that Obama was going to kill grandma.

    You people are just too fucking easy to please. Banksters know better.

  41. 41.

    General Stuck

    December 29, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    @Southern Beale:

    What’s the best way to go about it?

    Get corporate/private money out of politics. It is the only way, imho, and on that front, things do not look bright, ie Citizens United. I see nothing short of some serious pain and instability in this country, until we as a people start paying attention to our democracy. And now the SCOTUS has left but one door open to change our fate and return the country to the people. And that is a Constitutional Amendment to rid private cash from campaigns and politics of governing, in general and in toto. There is no light in that tunnel at present.

  42. 42.

    Walker

    December 29, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    @kdaug:

    Cactus from Angry Bear has a post a few days ago in which he uses a lot of data to argue that 65% is the optimal (as in revenue producing) top marginal for income taxes. I cannot comment on the validity of his methodology, but it is interesting nonetheless.

  43. 43.

    Mnemosyne

    December 29, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    @Southern Beale:

    The problem we have is that no one in power is standing up to the oligarchs and plutocrats. That means the banksters, the insurance titans, the oil barons, the masters of corporate hegemony. The few who do are quickly written off as fringe wackos.

    But having one man “find his balls” and stand up to them will totally work this time?

    Sorry, but the One Man theory of politics drives me up the fucking wall. Obama fought for (literally) years to get the tax cuts extended only for the middle class, and he was defeated. But apparently it was his own fault for losing, because he didn’t “find his balls” and magically win against the institutions stacked against him, including the House of Representatives and the US Senate.

    Gah.

  44. 44.

    General Stuck

    December 29, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    @ChrisS:

    Stop bringing lies to a fact fight.

  45. 45.

    stuckinred

    December 29, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    Billy Taylor, a pianist and composer who was also an eloquent spokesman and advocate for jazz as well as a familiar presence for many years on television and radio, died on Tuesday in Manhattan.

  46. 46.

    Mike Kay (True Grit)

    December 29, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    Maybe it’s just because obama so cool.

    Various groups (especially lefty blogs/ white house beat writers) complain that they don’t get enough attention or stroking from obama.

    It’s very high schoolish. Like teens angry that their girlfriend/boyfriend doesn’t spend enough time with them.

  47. 47.

    Brachiator

    December 29, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Traditionally, a “kleptocracy” was used to describe third world hellholes usually run by strongmen with high melanin counts. Zaire being a pretty good example of same.

    Nope. There’s actually a list. There’s a wide world of crooks of all colors, including people like former Ukrainian Prime Minister Pavlo Lazarenko ($114 million – $200 million).

    I even like how the newest level of crooks are described:

    A narcokleptocracy is a society ruled by “thieves” involved in the trade of narcotics. … The term was used specifically to describe the regime of Manuel Noriega in Panama.

    Money money money mon-ey.

  48. 48.

    Mike Kay (True Grit)

    December 29, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Speaking of Obama being cool, did anyone see him on the “Kennedy Center Honors” last night? He was rock’n and roll’n. And Alma Powell has the biggest crush on him.

    what a constrast with chimpy. Chimpy always would squirm in his seat and constantly smirk disapprovingly during the events, making sure everyone knew how much he hated being there.

  49. 49.

    ChrisS

    December 29, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    @General Stuck:
    http://articles.latimes.com/2009/oct/07/nation/na-health-gop7
    The president is trying to build the broadest coalition possible for his approach to reforming the healthcare system,” said Reid Cherlin, a White House spokesman. “We often find a very different, less partisan approach outside the hot house of the Beltway.”

    Eliciting expressions of GOP support was also part of an aggressive and carefully orchestrated White House campaign to accelerate its push for congressional support as major decision points draw nearer.

    Now, with all that outreach and bi-partisan ship, how many
    republicans in the house voted for the bill?

    A) 20
    B) 147
    C) 58
    D) 1

    “Tonight, in a historic vote, the House of Representatives passed a bill that would finally make real the promise of quality, affordable health care for the American people,” President Obama said after the vote.

    The bill nearly failed when a deal with conservative Dems collapsed and Pelosi was forced to let them bring up an amendment to restrict abortion coverage.

    The move enraged liberals, but most agreed to stay onboard and Obama traveled to the House Saturday to seal the deal with a personal plea.”

    Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/11/07/2009-11-07_health_care_reform_bill_nears_vote_in_house_amendment_restricts_abortion_coverag.html#ixzz19XZBSFgd

  50. 50.

    Villago Delenda Est

    December 29, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    @Brachiator:

    Gosh, I hope they didn’t forget Indonesia under the Suharto clan. Ah, good. They did not.

    My close personal friend Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire made the list! Huzzah!

    The hilarity is amplified in that the George W. Bush administration has a statement about “kleptocracies” on that wiki page. This is like the Corelones bitching about “organized crime”.

  51. 51.

    Delia

    December 29, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    The problem we have is that no one in power is standing up to the oligarchs and plutocrats. That means the banksters, the insurance titans, the oil barons, the masters of corporate hegemony. The few who do are quickly written off as fringe wackos.

    There is no light in that tunnel at present.

    Sorry, but the One Man theory of politics drives me up the fucking wall.

    Yeah, all of this is true. My first impulse was to mumble something about waiting for the final rising of the Proletariat against Capital, but that’s never worked out too well in the past.

  52. 52.

    joe from Lowell

    December 29, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    @Southern Beale:

    The problem we have is that no one in power is standing up to the oligarchs and plutocrats. That means the banksters, the insurance titans, the oil barons, the masters of corporate hegemony. The few who do are quickly written off as fringe wackos.

    Which makes the passage of Dodd-Frank that much more impressive.

    And no, being able to imagine an even better theoretical bill does not make the heated, $hundred million opposition to this bill by Wall Street any less real.

  53. 53.

    Mike Kay (True Grit)

    December 29, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    @joe from Lowell:

    Which makes the passage of Dodd-Frank that much more impressive.

    but… but… but Dodd-Frank was a give away/bailout/[insert hysteria here] to the banksters!!!

  54. 54.

    magisterludi

    December 29, 2010 at 5:05 pm

    I believe Ms Rand was a chain-smoking hophead, addicted to amphetamines, which explains a lot. No one feels more invincible than a speed freak.

    And “rugged individualist” is polite company talk for sociopath.

  55. 55.

    joe from Lowell

    December 29, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    So, here’s now this is going to go now:

    “Wall Street’s domination of our politics is absolute. It’s become impossible to reign them in, or adopt any policies they oppose, like increasing regulation on them.”

    joe: Well, the Dodd-Frank bill increased regulation on them quite a bit. They fought it pretty hard, but it ended up passed.

    “Pfft. Increasing regulation on Wall Street to any degree short of my ideal is a three-foot putt.”

    joe: I thought you just said that Wall Street’s dominance in our politics made it impossible to push back against them.

    “What are you, some kind of O-bot? Everyone knows you can pass some regulation on Wall Street. Why, it’s actually very easy.”

  56. 56.

    joe from Lowell

    December 29, 2010 at 5:12 pm

    @Mike Kay (True Grit):

    but… but… but Dodd-Frank was a give away/bailout/[insert hysteria here] to the banksters

    It’s called “deductive reasoning.”

    1. Only bills that are giveaways to Wall Street can pass.

    2. Dodd-Frank passed.

    C: Therefore, Dodd-Frank was a giveaway to Wall Street.

    Note that this line of reasoning requires absolutely zero knowledge about the contents of the Dodd-Frank bill, or what it does to Wall Street. You can decide you oppose it, and that those who support it are pro-Wall Street, without having to do any work considering or understanding it at all. You just have to wait to see what bill ends up available to pass, and decided you’re opposed to it entirely based on the possibility that it might pass.

    In fact, many do, and have, for all sorts of legislation.

  57. 57.

    Bob Loblaw

    December 29, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    @joe from Lowell:

    Obama didn’t save capitalism out of a deep-seated concern for spoiled assholes.

    Obama didn’t save capitalism. The Federal Reserve and its myriad trillion dollar lending facilities did. Which is a problem unto itself, for a completely different set of reasons.

    If people in this thread want to castigate the “great man” theory of politics, then one must be consistent. The US Treasury is an itty bitty speck next to the almighty power of the Fed’s balance sheet.

  58. 58.

    joe from Lowell

    December 29, 2010 at 5:25 pm

    Fair enough, Bob. I was using shorthand.

  59. 59.

    FlipYrWhig

    December 29, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    @General Stuck:

    Didn’t Kos his self arrive here yesterday to proclaim Obama is kissing the banksters asses and will become a one term presnit?

    You mean there’s a difference between “business” and “Wall Street”? No, this cannot be, we all know that there is but one hydra to slay, called Corporatism, and all businesses are its heads.

    Except Apple. They’re cool.

  60. 60.

    kdaug

    December 29, 2010 at 5:31 pm

    @Walker:

    Cactus from Angry Bear has a post a few days ago in which he uses a lot of data to argue that 65% is the optimal (as in revenue producing) top marginal for income taxes. I cannot comment on the validity of his methodology, but it is interesting nonetheless.

    Key phrase: “plus or minus ten percent”.

    And I’m feeling punitive.

    Just between you and me (shh, don’t tell), I’ll be reasonable, and settle for 82.5%. But 90% is my target.

  61. 61.

    General Stuck

    December 29, 2010 at 5:40 pm

    @ChrisS:

    Someday you will figure out that politics is about two things. How many votes, or reality, and perceptions. No winger was going to vote for HCR. It was a matter of base ideology for them. I wish you all on the netroots would just stop focusing on what people say, and focus on what happens.

    And what happened was HCR passed, and the reason there wasn’t a PO was because of democrats and Joe Lieberman, period. And just recently Obama wiped the floor with the wingers, at the last possible second, a three pointer from mid court, and it went in the basket to close out the most productive lame duck congress in history, and the most productive first two years for a presnit in many decades, at least.

    And Obama has gotten a little jump in the polls for his overall approval, and all the pretty empty words of kumbaya
    with the wingnuts fades into the ethers of history. And what remains is a tingly swing voter from hearing those pretty empty words. This game has many moving parts and it takes some intellectual effort to try and understand those moving parts, that make up the whole of governing and politics in this country. You focus on one thing, and you end up wrong, just about always. Things are about to get more serious however.

  62. 62.

    General Stuck

    December 29, 2010 at 5:43 pm

    @FlipYrWhig:

    You mean there’s a difference between “business” and “Wall Street”?

    No more or less than there is a difference between Obama and George W. Bush.

  63. 63.

    Brachiator

    December 29, 2010 at 5:43 pm

    @FlipYrWhig:

    Except Apple. They’re cool.

    And fezzes. Fezzes are cool.

  64. 64.

    Platonicspoof

    December 29, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    I don’t think “kleptocracy” encompasses the batshit insanity of believing that Ayn Rand was a serious economist. Or an economist of any kind, really.

    This needs to be part of the descriptions, in addition to Krugman’s word for ‘rule by the ridiculous’, as well as kleptocracy, idiocracy, etc.

    Maybe the encompassing term is something like this from the comments at Krugman’s post, where deanarms adds

    The Greek term for a system where madmen rule would be “trelacratia.” So how about this for an English derivative: Trelacracy.

  65. 65.

    joe from Lowell

    December 29, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    @FlipYrWhig:

    Except Apple. They’re cool.

    Nicely done. +1

  66. 66.

    Mike Kay (True Grit)

    December 29, 2010 at 6:02 pm

    @General Stuck: he has a stunning 91% approval rating among self described liberal democrats (and half the poll was taken before DADT was repealed).

  67. 67.

    PeakVT

    December 29, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    @kdaug: 90% of how much? If you look at the first and second charts in this otherwise lousy post, you can see how low in real terms the top bracket currently begins. 90% of $350,000 is different that 90% of $100,000,000.

  68. 68.

    Ruckus

    December 29, 2010 at 6:11 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    Maybe it’s like the guy who didn’t like the service on the airline and took a dump on the food cart.
    Maybe he’s supposed to stand on the podium at the sotu and jack off on everyone. Maybe that will show them he means business. Non of that talking stuff.

  69. 69.

    Suck It Up!

    December 29, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    We need to just start ignoring these complaints. period. Nothing but Politico planting stories for their friends.

    http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/80571/the-most-attention-money-can-buy

    From Chait:

    I asked intrepid Reporter-Researcher James Downie to tabulate how many times Politico alone has run some version of the “business upset at Obama” story.

    Then answer turns out to be, a lot of times:

    28 times since Obama’s 2nd damn month in office.

  70. 70.

    kdaug

    December 29, 2010 at 6:36 pm

    @PeakVT:
    Top marginal in 1942 was 94% on $200K ($2.6 mil, adjusted for inflation).

    Dropped to 91% on $400K throughout the 1950’s (hence, Eisenhower). $3.1 mil, adjusted.

    I’ll settle for 82.5% on anything over $5 mil.

    And I’m being fucking generous.

  71. 71.

    Barb (formerly Gex)

    December 29, 2010 at 6:42 pm

    @DougJ: Ah. But that was a deliberate policy by Republicans. Bush’s best work was done by just not funding regulation enforcement. Are they Dem voters?

  72. 72.

    pattonbt

    December 29, 2010 at 9:17 pm

    @General Stuck:

    And the other is remove “personhood” from corporations altogether. Make all enterprises partnerships (or equivalent) where directors, officers and management have personal stake and are liable for the companies actions, decisions and outcomes.

    The current wall between personal and corporate responsibility is the biggest impediment to a more smoothly functioning and equitable economic structure.

    Without personal responsibility, the people in the organizations can too easily shirk “due care” requirements for short term gratification.

  73. 73.

    General Stuck

    December 29, 2010 at 9:34 pm

    @pattonbt:

    Completely agree

  74. 74.

    agrippa

    December 29, 2010 at 10:49 pm

    @General Stuck:

    Quite so. There is a real need to get corporate /private money out of politics. It is tanatmonut to bribery; that is, deniable bribery.

    Both parties to the transaction know enough to avoid a ‘quid pro quo’. Nothing need be said.

    It is an interesting transaction: the donors bribe the politicians; the politicians extort money from the donors. Both are deniable.

    There is underlying truth as well: 40 to 60% of the eligible voters do not vote. Without that underlying fact this corrupt system would be harder to maintain.

  75. 75.

    agrippa

    December 29, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    American politics is an organized fatuity.

  76. 76.

    Quiddity

    December 29, 2010 at 11:01 pm

    @Jack: I say it’s more a plutocracy than oligarchy.

  77. 77.

    priscianusjr

    December 30, 2010 at 10:40 am

    The one good thing about the way things have been going over the last few decades is that, whereas back in the day, the banks were running things hidden way in the background; now they’ve cannibalized that protective shield to such an extent that they are well in the foreground. Obama wasn’t wrong when he told them “I’m all that’s standing between you and the pitchforks.” You no longer have to be paranoid to see what the banksters are all about. America is now paying some attention to the man behind the curtain.

  78. 78.

    joe from Lowell

    December 30, 2010 at 10:59 am

    @PeakVT:

    90% of $350,000 is different that 90% of $100,000,000

    We have marginal tax brackets in this country, so we don’t collect “90% of $350,000.” If the 90% tax rate starts at $350,000, and you earn $350,001, they government only collects 90% of that $1 you earned over $350k.

  79. 79.

    Sasha

    December 30, 2010 at 12:47 pm

    @FlipYrWhig:

    Except Apple. They’re cool.

    And Google. Google’s name should also be put on the Protected scrolls.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • glc on Saturday Morning Open Thread: Gradually, Then All At Once (Sep 23, 2023 @ 2:24pm)
  • karen marie on Saturday Morning Open Thread: Gradually, Then All At Once (Sep 23, 2023 @ 2:22pm)
  • Another Scott on Saturday Morning Open Thread: Gradually, Then All At Once (Sep 23, 2023 @ 1:54pm)
  • Geminid on Saturday Morning Open Thread: Gradually, Then All At Once (Sep 23, 2023 @ 1:50pm)
  • divF on Saturday Morning Open Thread: Gradually, Then All At Once (Sep 23, 2023 @ 1:49pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!