• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The low info voters probably won’t even notice or remember by their next lap around the goldfish bowl.

This must be what justice looks like, not vengeful, just peaceful exuberance.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

The unpunished coup was a training exercise.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

I really should read my own blog.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

Republicans cannot even be trusted with their own money.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

One lie, alone, tears the fabric of reality.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Just because you believe it, that does not make it true.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

You passed on an opportunity to be offended? What are you even doing here?

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Progressive Glee to Hit Critical Threshhold

Progressive Glee to Hit Critical Threshhold

by John Cole|  January 24, 20111:17 pm| 66 Comments

This post is in: Show Me On the Doll Where Rahm Touched You

FacebookTweetEmail

This is interesting:

Rahm Emanuel’s residency fight just took a turn for the worse. The Illinois Appellate Court ruled 2-1 to overturn a Chicago Board of Elections decision to allow Rahm Emanuel on the mayoral ballot. Rahm’s Attorney Kevin Forde says “its a surprise.”

I honestly can’t think of a political issue I care about less than whether Rahm becomes mayor of Chicago, which makes sense, because I DON’T LIVE THERE. However, the twitterverse is abuzz.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Al Gore is fat
Next Post: Bombing in Moscow »

Reader Interactions

66Comments

  1. 1.

    Zifnab

    January 24, 2011 at 1:19 pm

    The Illinois Appellate Court ruled 2-1 to overturn a Chicago Board of Elections decision to allow Rahm Emanuel on the mayoral ballot.

    I hope, for their sakes, they don’t use Rahm’s gym locker room.

  2. 2.

    Steve

    January 24, 2011 at 1:23 pm

    This surprises me. The courts generally lean in favor of ballot access, and the arguments against Rahm never impressed me as particularly strong, but whatever. There is, of course, at least one more rung in the court system that he can climb.

  3. 3.

    fasteddie9318

    January 24, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    Well, looks like somebody wasn’t paid up with the right judges. Or was, depending on your point of view. Hard to tell with Chicago politics.

  4. 4.

    Alex S.

    January 24, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    I have a feeling that Carol Moseley Brown would not be a good mayor.

  5. 5.

    KG

    January 24, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    so, um, good news for John McCain?

  6. 6.

    Annelid Gustator

    January 24, 2011 at 1:26 pm

    Well there’s his mistake: he should have attempted to get on the mayoral ballet.

  7. 7.

    Don

    January 24, 2011 at 1:26 pm

    Save the seat next to you on the Who Gives A Shit bus for me.

    I do think residency requirements and term limits are a big waste of everyone’s time. If those things are important to voters they have an excellent remedy: the election.

  8. 8.

    Allan

    January 24, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    Just as it was ill-advised of Rahm to quit his day job without nailing down all the loose ends first, it was also ill-advised for a blogger to visit a military base without doing likewise.

    That’s all I’m saying.

  9. 9.

    cleek

    January 24, 2011 at 1:30 pm

    However, the twitterverse is abuzz.

    the world keeps confirming to me that not taking up Twitter continues to be the right decision.

  10. 10.

    TooManyJens

    January 24, 2011 at 1:31 pm

    My only investment in this is that I want to be able to keep following @MayorEmanuel on Twitter. That shit’s hilarious.

  11. 11.

    Mattminus

    January 24, 2011 at 1:31 pm

    Rahm (the Spaceknight) Emanuel is racist against retards just like Jane Hamsher, and should be held without trial at Quantico Bay and subjected to a Living Tribunal.

  12. 12.

    JGabriel

    January 24, 2011 at 1:31 pm

    John Cole:

    I honestly can’t think of a political issue I care about less than whether Rahm becomes mayor of Chicago …

    Ditto. If possible, I probably care even less than you. More likely, we’re tied in our utter lack of Chicago Mayoralty caringness.

    .

  13. 13.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    January 24, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    I think it’s funny as hell. Maybe he can run for mayor of Jerusalem if the Chicago thing doesn’t work out.

  14. 14.

    El Cid

    January 24, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    Awesome! Another hugely significant discussion of progressives who go over the top getting mad about Rahm!

  15. 15.

    fasteddie9318

    January 24, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    Regardless of the specific person involved, it strikes me as legally indefensible to deny residency to somebody because they’ve been working in the federal government. What’s next, denying residency to overseas military?

  16. 16.

    J.A.F. Rusty Shackleford

    January 24, 2011 at 1:38 pm

    Chicagoan here…I was/am going to vote for Rahm. Hopefully this gets straightened out.

  17. 17.

    JasonK

    January 24, 2011 at 1:38 pm

    I don’t know how they could overrule this. It’s ridiculous. The guy was a Rep. here obviously prior to becoming Chief of Staff. As he was leasing his property he would still be listed as owner of the property. This is bullshit.

  18. 18.

    cyntax

    January 24, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    The @MayorEmanuel feed is the next best thing to the spoof Christopher Walken feed:

    Motherfucking shit fucking fuck shitters. What the fucking fuck motherfucking happened?!

  19. 19.

    The Main Gauche of Mild Reason

    January 24, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    Honestly, I think this is a weird decision. Residency is largely a technical classification (where you file taxes, how long you’ve resided there, etc) rather than a de facto one. Plus, the obvious intention of the residency requirement is to prevent carpetbagging. But none of these would apply to Rahm; the guy’s been a congressperson representing Chicago until recently, has ties there, he still owns property there, has always suggested he’d return–so I can’t think of any reason to apply residency requirements in such a stringent way short of political gamesmanship.

  20. 20.

    lacp

    January 24, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    I’m really, really trying to care about this. OK, that’s a lie – I don’t give a shit.

  21. 21.

    suzanne

    January 24, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    @cleek: Word to that.

    I started a Twitter account over a year ago. I’ve never tweeted? twit? twat? twatted? since. And I don’t even read the tweets? twits? twats? of the people I supposedly follow.

    Though, I’ll admit, I have to remind myself not to share gynecological information in my Facebook status updates.

  22. 22.

    Violet

    January 24, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    Why would Rahm’s mayoral race affect anyone who doesn’t live in Chicago? I can’t imagine anything I care about less.

    Progressives who are full of glee about this should be careful what they wish for. He might run for something else and they’ll be longing for the days when he was only able to ruin Chicago.

  23. 23.

    cathyx

    January 24, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    I guess he’ll just have to go on unemployment then.

  24. 24.

    Culture of Truth

    January 24, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    The twitter feed was hilarious. Made the game much more entertaining.

  25. 25.

    Alex S.

    January 24, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    Emanuel should have run against Mark Kirk… now he’ll have to wait 6 years. Maybe he runs for his old seat in the House.

  26. 26.

    jerry 101

    January 24, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    I live in Chicago, and am very directly affected by this.

    It’s not over yet – It’s fairly widely known that the residency challenges were going to be decided by the Illinois State Supreme Court, so this is just on it’s way up to the top. The State Supremes are the ones who matter.

    Unfortunately, my gut feeling is that he’ll win the residency ruling, and the mayor’s race. The other candidates running for Mayor aren’t that great – The Powers That Be convinced all the best non-Rahm candidates to stay out of the race (David Hoffman, Alexi Giannoulias, a few of the better aldermen). This race is supposed to be handed to Rahm on a silver platter by Daley.

    If Rahmn actually gets kicked off the ballot, the race will probably come down to Carol Mosely Braun versus Gery Chico in a run-off.

    While I’m a bit partial to Ms. Braun, she’s run a hellishly bad race, so I’m leaning Chico.

  27. 27.

    BGinCHI

    January 24, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    I’m amazed at how little anyone I know is talking about this. I’m not a local political (machine) junky, but people aren’t nervous or even outwardly fascinated by the mayoral race.

    Others in Chi want to say what’s going on around them?

    And if you don’t live here I could see why you wouldn’t care. But where you live prolly has a better quarterback so what do you gotta worry about?

  28. 28.

    BGinCHI

    January 24, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    @Violet: You’ll be entertained though when he changes the city motto to “What the fuck are you looking at, retard?”

    Or does Staten Island already have that?

  29. 29.

    Sly

    January 24, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    On rare occassions, Twitter provides a useful service.

    OK, Carl the Intern makes a good point: Appellate courts are for pussies. We’re going to motherfucking Supreme this bullshit.

  30. 30.

    General Stuck

    January 24, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    Now that Rahm has become a victim of The Man, it might just make him progressive sponge worthy. You just never know which way the worm turns with that crew.

  31. 31.

    Violet

    January 24, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    @BGinCHI:
    I’d be really amused if he did something like that.

    That twitter feed is hilarious. Good stuff.

  32. 32.

    WyldPirate

    January 24, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    @BGinCHI:

    And if you don’t live here I could see why you wouldn’t care. But where you live prolly has a better quarterback so what do you gotta worry about?

    Easy to say while you’re sitting at home on YOUR couch watching the game.

    And leave Jay Cutler alooooonnnne! Also, too.

  33. 33.

    Phil Perspective

    January 24, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    @jerry 101: It’s the fact that we can have a laugh at Rahm’s expense for a day or two. That’s what. In fact, most people having that laugh probably figure that the ruling will be overturned(Wouldn’t that be something if it isn’t?). Not to mention the satircal Twitter feed someone mentioned above.

  34. 34.

    stuckinred

    January 24, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    @BGinCHI: Buncha ferries

  35. 35.

    BGinCHI

    January 24, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    @WyldPirate: I didn’t like him before the game.

    And just for the record, I rooted for the Pack. I just can’t get behind the Bears right now. They give me a bad vibe.

  36. 36.

    Joseph Nobles

    January 24, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    The dissent reads well. The appellate court may yet be overturned.

    OT: Erick Fucking Bloody Erickson is holding out hope that “massive bloodshed” won’t be necessary over Roe v. Wade, but he’s down with it if that’s what it takes.

  37. 37.

    David in NY

    January 24, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    @suzanne:

    Re past tense of “to twitter”: “twatted?”

    I’m down with that (so to speak). Maybe if we call it “twatted” we can end the whole thing.

  38. 38.

    John PM

    January 24, 2011 at 2:16 pm

    I just read the opinion and it is bad. The Appellate Court said that Rahm cannot run for mayor, but he can still vote, even though the residency requirements appear the same for both voters and candidates.

    John, I can understand why you are not concerned since you live in West Virginia (State Motto: We like blowing the tops off of our mountains), but this ruling, were it to stand, would affect all municipal offices in Illinois, not just those in Chicago. I think that the dissent has the better argument and that the opinion will be overturned. The main problem is that there is not a lot of time before absentee ballots are sent out. The other problem with this decision is that this could lead to Mayor Carol Mosley-Braun, which would be horrendous.

  39. 39.

    Joey Maloney

    January 24, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    @David in NY: No such luck. Twatter: the anti-social network.

  40. 40.

    rikyrah

    January 24, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    I find it hilarious.

    as a Chicagoan, I would chew ground glass before I’d ever vote for Rahm.

  41. 41.

    srv

    January 24, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    Yeah, John, we know, you didn’t care when Rahm and Daley’s were the go to guys on NAFTA and all those other wonderful “free trade” agreements. Just uninteresting these folks history. People who loathe them are just deranged.

    And no problem Emanuel and the Daley brothers working out a swap like that. We can already see the results: prop the president up there and blather about “competitiveness” while you let GE trade avionics/engine tech with China for Boeing selling some planes. GE will open an partnership with China in a few years, and not long after that the engine on your plane will say “Made in China” and your domestic plants will shut down.

    Heard that record before?

    How many jobs do democrats have to give away for short-term gains before you find a clue?

  42. 42.

    PeakVT

    January 24, 2011 at 2:24 pm

    One less influence-peddling ex-investment banker in political office is a good thing in my book, so I hope the ruling is upheld.

  43. 43.

    Mnemosyne

    January 24, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    @fasteddie9318:

    Regardless of the specific person involved, it strikes me as legally indefensible to deny residency to somebody because they’ve been working in the federal government. What’s next, denying residency to overseas military?

    That’s what I was thinking, too. Is a court going to decide that someone serving in the Army in Germany can’t vote in US elections because they’re not physically present in the US? Or, heck, even someone serving within the US who has residency in another state?

    This would seem to open up a whole can of worms that I doubt any court is going to want to dig through.

    (I have family in the Chicagoland area but not in the city itself).

  44. 44.

    Ash Can

    January 24, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    The scuttlebutt I’ve heard is that Rahm doesn’t get along very well with the various labor unions around Chicago, which could hurt him at the polls (if he ends up staying on the ballot, which I’m betting will happen given the findings by the lower court and the Board of Elections). There are loads of city workers where I live, but I get a skewed view from them since they’re averse to anyone who might eliminate their jobs in cost-cutting/cleanup measures, regardless of how much overall good those measures would do the city. In my own personal view, we could do worse than to have Rahm as mayor, if for no other reason than the fact his DC connections would likely come in handy. But he’s no Cory Booker. Then again, none of the candidates are. Carol Mosley Braun had some fairly serious and well-publicized judgment issues when she was a US senator, so I’m not planning on voting for her. As for the other guys, I’m not at all confident they can juggle all the different political factions in the city. I don’t know that much about them, though, so I may change my tune over the coming days and weeks. But I kind of doubt it.

  45. 45.

    David in NY

    January 24, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    @Joey Maloney: Well, thanks for the information, I think.

  46. 46.

    Mnemosyne

    January 24, 2011 at 2:28 pm

    @srv:

    Yeah, John, we know, you didn’t care when Rahm and Daley’s were the go to guys on NAFTA and all those other wonderful “free trade” agreements. Just uninteresting these folks history. People who loathe them are just deranged.

    And that explains your obsession with a local election in a city you don’t live in why, again? I’m pretty sure the city of Chicago isn’t going to be able to enact its own NAFTA agreement.

    If anything, you should be thrilled that Emanuel is getting out of national politics and will only be able to screw up a single city instead of the whole country.

  47. 47.

    chopper

    January 24, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    maybe mayor rahm will buy the parking meters back.

  48. 48.

    shoestring potato

    January 24, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    Absentee ballots are already out.

    My friend got hers in the mail last week

  49. 49.

    fasteddie9318

    January 24, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    If anything, you should be thrilled that Emanuel is getting out of national politics and will only be able to screw up a single city instead of the whole country.

    Daley left him with a city that can’t be unscrewed, so he won’t even have a chance to screw that up, really.

  50. 50.

    srv

    January 24, 2011 at 2:37 pm

    @Mnemosyne: Yeah, I should be thrilled the Daley brothers trade NAFTA Rahm for NAFTA Bill to be CoS and a play for a future national spot with which to fuck America even more.

  51. 51.

    Eric S.

    January 24, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    @shoestring potato: Early voting starts next Monday. It would seem the ILL Supreme Court will have to rule quickly.

    As a Chicagoan I am paying attention. In response to BG who asks how people around me are watching it varies. A couple of us political junkies are paying attention. Most of us assume Rahm has/had it in the bag. Most people I know are not paying attention or at least not talking about it. I figure that’s related to two things. First, the assumption that Rahm is the anointed successor. Second, everyone is burned out from the midterm elections. For the record, the scheduling of the Chicago elections in February is a feature not a bug. The Machine wants people disengaged.

  52. 52.

    debbie

    January 24, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    @cyntax:

    I loved that Walken feed and am saddened to learn it wasn’t real. I must say, I saw his last SNL appearance and was disappointed that he wasn’t as quirky as his Twitter posts. Now I know why.

  53. 53.

    msskwesq

    January 24, 2011 at 3:04 pm

    He will appeal and win, in my opinion. AND the people of Chicago should hope he wins his appeal as the remaining candidates are really not qualified to be the mayor of Chicago. Chicago is really a complex city and it will take someone who can handle all that complexity. Rham, although I wasn’t a fan of his at the White House, I think has the backbone and the smarts to handle the city’s business. Carol Mosley Braun is far far from qualified – she has tax issues and financial problems. She was connected to some ethical issues when she was the Senator. The rest of the slate are just not qualified, period.

  54. 54.

    cyntax

    January 24, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    @debbie:

    Yeah, it was a little too good to be true, but fun while it lasted.

    And while I have no opinion on the whole Rahm thing, this struck me as pretty funny:

    Opponents have argued Emanuel is not a resident of Chicago because he rented out his North Side home while serving as chief of staff to Obama. The renter — Rob Halpin — refused to allow Emanuel to move back in after Mayor Daley’s announcement last year that he would not seek re-election. Halpin briefly ran for mayor himself.

    That Halpin once ran for mayor really brings it all together.

  55. 55.

    jsfox

    January 24, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    Just when you think Rahm Derangement Syndrome has finally dissipated along come the Courts to crank it up again.

  56. 56.

    Tim

    January 24, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    YAY. My feeling has long been that Rahm E is a complete douche when it comes to public service, and his performance in the O administration, not to overlook is apparent off the charts arrogance, so I welcome any development that brings him angst.

    Especially as it regards his attempt to carpet bag his way to Chicago mayordom.

    That said, he is exceedingly hot, if small, and I would like to have sex with him.

  57. 57.

    BGinCHI

    January 24, 2011 at 3:20 pm

    @Eric S.: This sounds exactly right to me. +1.

  58. 58.

    BGinCHI

    January 24, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    That said, he is exceedingly hot, if small, and I would like to have sex with him.

    It’s pretty lengthy, but this ought to be a tag.

  59. 59.

    hilts

    January 24, 2011 at 3:33 pm

    Somewhere, Eric Massa is smiling. Hopefully, Emanuel has learned his lesson and will never again confront someone outside of a shower stall while he’s naked as a jaybird.

  60. 60.

    Cain

    January 24, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    Looks like a shower with the judge is in order.

    cain

  61. 61.

    Pat

    January 24, 2011 at 3:53 pm

    So where does he live???????????????????

  62. 62.

    Valdivia

    January 24, 2011 at 4:11 pm

    Have to second Tim on the hot but small and wanting to have sex with Rahm bit.

  63. 63.

    Mnemosyne

    January 24, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    @srv:

    Yeah, I should be thrilled the Daley brothers trade NAFTA Rahm for NAFTA Bill to be CoS and a play for a future national spot with which to fuck America even more.

    Still not seeing what your obsession with the mayoral race in Chicago has to do with NAFTA, unless you think that Chicago and St. Louis are about to enter into some kind of similar agreement. Is your argument that Bill Daley should have stayed there and run for mayor himself?

  64. 64.

    Shinobi

    January 24, 2011 at 4:59 pm

    I saw Rahm glad handing on the red line the other day. I didn’t recognize him at first, I was like, who is this extremely short guy in the Patagonia fleece and pin stripes smiling at people, is he going to ask me for money? Or perhaps ask me to accept Jesus Christ as mys savior?

    Everyone sort of avoided him, and I only realized who he was as I passed. He really should invest in some buttons or something more conspicuous than himself and a guy in a trench fiddling with his blackberry. Does he not KNOW how many crazy people there are on any given red line platform?

    (I live in Evanston and work in Chicago, I will be affected a great deal by the mayoral race, but I have no say in it. But then I don’t have to hear my neighbors having sex, so… trade-offs.)

  65. 65.

    cynickal

    January 24, 2011 at 5:54 pm

    As a progressive, my first thought on reading about Rahm was, “I bet John Cole is still an asshole.”

  66. 66.

    Bloix

    January 24, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    The opinion is idiotic. The statute at issue has a specific provision that the residency requirement doesn’t apply if you’re out of state “on United States business.” The court admits that the provision applies to the part of the statute that requires residency for voting, and then ties itself in a knot to get to the conclusion that it doesn’t apply to the part of the statute that applies to running for office. It’s a completely result-oriented decision and it’s utterly unconvincing.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - beckya57 - Copper Canyon, Mexico, April 2025 6
Image by beckya57 (6/19/25)

Recent Comments

  • Adam L Silverman on War for Ukraine Day 1,211: Another Drone Swarm in the Small Hours (Jun 20, 2025 @ 12:17am)
  • Trivia Man on Late Night Open Thread: Another Musk Rocket Goes Boom (Jun 20, 2025 @ 12:16am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on Our Failed Media Experiment (Jun 20, 2025 @ 12:12am)
  • stacib on Open Thread: One Step Forward, Half-Steps Backwards… (Jun 20, 2025 @ 12:10am)
  • Geminid on Our Failed Media Experiment (Jun 20, 2025 @ 12:00am)

Personality Crisis Podcast (Cole, DougJ, mistermix)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!