• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

Bark louder, little dog.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. keep building.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

There is no compromise when it comes to body autonomy. You either have it or you do not.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

If you thought you’d already seen people saying the stupidest things possible on the internet, prepare yourselves.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

This blog will pay for itself.

They punch you in the face and then start crying because their fist hurts.

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

I did not have this on my fuck 2025 bingo card.

Lick the third rail, it tastes like chocolate!

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / Egypt

Egypt

by @heymistermix.com|  January 28, 20118:24 am| 124 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs

FacebookTweetEmail

According to the Guardian live feed, the Internet is cut off, opposition leader Mohamed El Baradei is in custody has been detained, and police are siding with rioters in some cities.

I’ll leave it up to you to check the Washington Post editorial page to see if the right sort of Muslims are rioting, and therefore this is another blow for democracy and liberty, or if it is the work of terrorists.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread: Thursday Night Menu
Next Post: RW ‘Lone Gunmen’ Go Global »

Reader Interactions

124Comments

  1. 1.

    Maude

    January 28, 2011 at 8:31 am

    I heard that 7 members of the Muslim Brotherhood were detained.
    I wonder if this is at the point where Mubarak is trying to hang onto power.

  2. 2.

    Short Bus Bully

    January 28, 2011 at 8:32 am

    I’ll leave it up to you to check the Washington Post editorial page to see if the right sort of Muslims are rioting, and therefore this is another blow for democracy and liberty, or if it is the work of terrorists.

    If they are brown and swarthy, I’ll take “wrong kind of muslims according to the WAPO” for $200 mistermix.

  3. 3.

    Comrade Jake

    January 28, 2011 at 8:33 am

    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised.

  4. 4.

    4tehlulz

    January 28, 2011 at 8:34 am

    Yes.

  5. 5.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 8:36 am

    These uprisings have a chance to work only when some of the state’s security organs – police, army, secret police – side with the protesters.

    So far, there are sporadic reports of police and soldiers refusing to fire on the crowds.

  6. 6.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 8:41 am

    I haven’t seen reports of ElBaradei being detained. He and his supporters were hit with water cannons, and some of his supporters were beaten with battons, so I would think the next escalation would be his arrest, but I’ve seen no report.

    And I thought the first fighters for democracy and liberty in just about every regime are labeled “terrorists”, or whatever that age’s term is/was.

  7. 7.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 8:42 am

    @joe from Lowell:

    So far, there are sporadic reports of police and soldiers refusing to fire on the crowds.

    Suez, from what I’ve seen. If it gets to Cairo, then Mubarak has a real problem.

    ETA : See the Beeb reports now, which seems way better tha al Jazeera. Odd, that.

  8. 8.

    p.a.

    January 28, 2011 at 8:44 am

    I’ll leave it up to you to check the Washington Post editorial page to see if the right sort of Muslims are rioting, and therefore this is another blow for democracy and liberty, or if it is the work of terrorists.

    Some writer at Sully fisks (much too gently) a HHewitt post which says if we had just overthrown the Egyptian and Saudi gvts. in 2005 we would not have to worry about Islamist revoultions there. to quote Dave Barry “I’m not making this up.”

  9. 9.

    David Fud

    January 28, 2011 at 8:45 am

    @Poopyman: Umm, it is the first headline in the link mistermix provided:
    • Mohamed ElBaradei has been detained

    ETA: though it seems that link doesn’t provide additional information. So, I guess it is a headline with no substance at this point.

  10. 10.

    Jack Bauer

    January 28, 2011 at 8:48 am

    Walk Like An Egyptian

  11. 11.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 8:48 am

    @Poopyman: Guardian, not the Beeb.

    And FYWP.

  12. 12.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 8:52 am

    Found the al Jazeera liveblog, for more info.

  13. 13.

    Gin & Tonic

    January 28, 2011 at 8:52 am

    I posted this in the meatloaf thread last night, but fairly detailed analyses of the Egyptian Internet cutoff can be found here and here. These actions are truly unprecedented.

  14. 14.

    Anya

    January 28, 2011 at 8:52 am

    I’ll leave it up to you to check the Washington Post editorial page to see if the right sort of Muslims are rioting, and therefore this is another blow for democracy and liberty, or if it is the work of terrorists.

    They don’t want Egypt to be democratic, they just want them to have the right sort of a dictator, for Israel’s sake, of course.

  15. 15.

    SteveinSC

    January 28, 2011 at 8:55 am

    Tunisia and Egypt: Spotlights on the hilarity that was George Bush’s and his apologists’ “Wave of Democracy” spreading across the Middle East as a result of the Iraq fiasco. Just like the 1950’s anti-communist dictators of Central and South America, our bulwark of freedom. American exceptionalism at work.

  16. 16.

    Ija

    January 28, 2011 at 8:57 am

    NY Times has already invoked the Muslim Brotherhood. Of course this is not the right sort of Muslims. Expect editorials denouncing the protesters for their violence soon.

  17. 17.

    Pococurante

    January 28, 2011 at 9:00 am

    Cutting off our aid to Egypt would go a long way towards weakening the authoritarian regime. Assuming of course that was actual US policy.

    What gets missed in the “why do they hate us for our freedoms” rationalization (not here among the BJ Commentariat of course) is that they actually hate us because we enable these regimes and have for over a century. And of course the US was simply a latecomer to the game.

    We all had a good time in another thread piling on Aqua Buddah, but his fundamental point was that we shouldn’t be meddling at all – that seems reasonable to me.

    Frankly I’m tired of propping up North Korea by keeping bases in SoKo and Japan. I haven’t understood bases in the EU since 1991.

    Cutting aid seems reasonable to a lot of people here when the topic is Israel. This feels inconsistent to me because we prop up a lot of regimes that are far more ruthless. And by propping up those more ruthless regimes we wonder why they hate us for our freedoms. It’s not like any of the recipients stay bought anyway.

    /ponder

  18. 18.

    Cacti

    January 28, 2011 at 9:00 am

    @Ija:

    NY Times has already invoked the Muslim Brotherhood. Of course this is not the right sort of Muslims. Expect editorials denouncing the protesters for their violence soon.

    And some handwringing about how unfortunate it is that these poor benighted sods aren’t ready for “teh tru demokkkracy” and need the steadying hand of a west-approved dictator.

  19. 19.

    beltane

    January 28, 2011 at 9:05 am

    Netanyahu cannot be happy with the events in Egypt so neither will the Washington Post’s editorial board.

    Seriously, the past few days have rendered the US media completely useless. I’ve been getting all my information from the Guardian and Al Jazeera; MSNBC & CNN are all caught up with Charlie Sheen and the Kardashians.

    I’m still waiting to hear from Tom Friedman so I can know what to think.

  20. 20.

    Jack Bauer

    January 28, 2011 at 9:05 am

    Calling it an Islamist uprising allows them to avoid calling it a People’s Revolution.

  21. 21.

    xian

    January 28, 2011 at 9:07 am

    @Ija: I heard on NPR yesterday(?) that protesters were eschewing any signs or labels or party affiliations, to communicate that it was a pan-Egyptian uprising.

  22. 22.

    Ija

    January 28, 2011 at 9:10 am

    @Jack Bauer:

    I predict many, many stories in the papers about the close relationship between the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda.
    Heck, maybe some anonymous source can provide “evidence” that the Muslim Brotherhood has been hiding Osama bin Laden all along.

  23. 23.

    beltane

    January 28, 2011 at 9:12 am

    @Jack Bauer: Since most of the people protesting are Muslims (though there is a strong Christian contingent) than any show of public anger is by definition an Islamist uprising. If they became whiter and evangelical and joined the Tea Party then it would be a true people’s revolution.

  24. 24.

    Ija

    January 28, 2011 at 9:12 am

    @xian:

    If the Muslim Brotherhood people are smart, they will stay the hell out of this. The worst thing is for the revolution to be associated with them. Once there is a democratic election, they can always run.

  25. 25.

    Cacti

    January 28, 2011 at 9:20 am

    I hear the Muslim brotherhood is throwing babies out of incubators.

  26. 26.

    Joey Maloney

    January 28, 2011 at 9:23 am

    @Ija: If the Muslim Brotherhood people are smart…

    They’re not, though, for good or ill. Most of the time, presented with a situation like this, they’ve behaved like Al Sharpton on meth, shoving themselves to the front of the line, annoying their potential allies and giving the enemies of those allies a convenient way to paint a big target on everyone.

    …and even as I type this, the BBC is reporting that the MB is “jumping on the bandwagon” and the Egyptian Government is thrilled to be able to point at them and the threat of an Islamic republic. Damn I hate being right. Good thing it happens so seldom.

  27. 27.

    MattF

    January 28, 2011 at 9:24 am

    I’m just waiting for Frank Gaffney to reveal that the Egyptians have been building WMDs and will kill us all in the next six months if we don’t invade Egypt right now.

  28. 28.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 9:25 am

    @Ija:

    If the Muslim Brotherhood people are smart, they will stay the hell out of this.

    untrue. The historical american foreign policy of supporting dictators/strongmen in the ME actually has extremely negative results for America. The oppressive regime becomes inexorably convolved with America, and by definition Israel, local oligarchs, and judeoxian style (western style) democracy, leaving radical islam to infill the oppositionary position of citizen rights and social justice.
    The islamists, like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, get to become the liberal revolutionaries, even though they may be far more repressive when they actually take power.

    The epic flaw in American “democracy promotion” theory in the ME is that when muslims are democratically empowered to vote, they vote for Islam.
    Thus strongman policy, and the incredibly ignorant Bush Doctrine, just become recipes for building more islamic states.
    In strongman theory, the idea is that the dictator sponsers an environment hospitable to the fostering of western culture and western democracy. But islamic culture is immune to western/judeoxian proselytization in situ, because of EGT.
    So the result of both strongman policy and the Bush Doctrine is more islamic states…like Iran, like Iraq, like Turkey, and like A-stan and Yemen will be. And like Egypt. Does anyone doubt that the MB will be the power in the next government?
    There is a perception problem in America. America is not a secular nation. The founders and framers would have liked it to be, but were trumped by human nature in the end. Consider racism and slavery. Modern america is not the nation of Martin Luther King, it is the nation of Martin Luther.
    The new PEW survey points out that in 20 years 1 out of 4 humans will be muslim.
    And only 1 out of 15 humans will be non-hispanic caucasian.
    So while there maybe attractive and beneficial things in western culture, western culture proselytization, aka “democracy promotion”, can simply never succeed in +95% muslim states. Because of the consent of the governed and because when muslims are democratically empowered to vote they vote for more Islam, not less, and never for judeoxian/westernstyle democracy.

    and…..tolejaso tolejaso tolejaso!
    mwuahahahaha

  29. 29.

    stuckinred

    January 28, 2011 at 9:30 am

    @Cacti: bayonet

  30. 30.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 9:30 am

    @Ija: Oh yeah. They’ve got a prime example in Ayman al-Zawahiri.

    “By the age of 14, al-Zawahiri had joined the Muslim Brotherhood.”

  31. 31.

    homerhk

    January 28, 2011 at 9:31 am

    I’ll leave it up to you to check the Washington Post editorial page to see if the right sort of Muslims are rioting, and therefore this is another blow for democracy and liberty, or if it is the work of terrorists.

    It’s easy to be glib about this but it is a serious concern. The Iranian revolution in the late 70s was initially given impetus by the general population of that country railing against the Shah’s oppressive policies. The Ayatollah at the stage was in exile in France and completely eschewed any idea that he wanted to take over governing the country but ultimately what happened was something far more dangerous both to Iran and to the wider world. It is of course absolutely distasteful that the US and the world in general (this is not just a US made issue) have to do business with dictators like Mubarak but I will bet a lot of money that if the government is overthrown and Mubarak toppled it won’t be Al Baradei who takes his place (or at the very least there is a severe risk that this will not happen). And yes, Egypt was the birthplace of the Muslim Brotherhood which in some ways was a precursor to Al Qaeda.

  32. 32.

    Ija

    January 28, 2011 at 9:32 am

    @matoko_chan:

    So while there maybe attractive and beneficial things in western culture, western culture proselytization, aka “democracy promotion”, can simply never succeed in +95% muslim states. Because of the consent of the governed and because when muslims are democratically empowered to vote they vote for more Islam, not less, and never for judeoxian/westernstyle democracy.

    So, your solution is for us to prop up more dictators in these countries to avoid the dreaded “people voting for more Islam” thing?

  33. 33.

    Chris

    January 28, 2011 at 9:35 am

    @Pococurante:

    And of course the US was simply a latecomer to the game.

    The U.S. had a chance to try a different form of foreign policy in some parts of the Middle-East, Iran especially. Most people still didn’t know what to make of us in the immediate aftermath of WW2; Mossadegh’s government was on good terms with Truman’s and was actually hoping for a friendship with us, believing, based on their observation of our relations with the Saudis, that we’d be fairer partners than the British had been.

    Just imagine how different the Middle East would be if we’d taken the kind of investment we made into the Shah and the Saudis and actually thrown it behind a populist, democratic government in Iran. And imagine what the third world would look like if we’d done the same with Arbenz in Guatemala and Lumumba in the Congo, instead of overthrowing them and setting up Wall Street friendly thugs.

  34. 34.

    Alex S.

    January 28, 2011 at 9:36 am

    I guess that islamic nations would naturally elect islamic parties in a democracy, just like there are christian or christian values’ parties in the West, like the Republicans (in some ways), the ruling party in Germany, the conservative party of Spain, and other examples from Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands and so on… The prime example of a popular conservative islamic leader is Tayip Erdogan of Turkey and he has been vilified by the conservative media since the Israel Flotilla incident.
    I guess that the democratic way to counter religious conservatives would be to form a strong labor party so you have one socially conservative party and one social democratic party (as in Germany, France, the UK, and lots of other places). But a true party of the workers would hurt western business interests and that might be the reason why the West prefers to prop up corrupt dictators to keep the islamic influence at bay.

  35. 35.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 9:40 am

    @Ija: nope. promote islamic democracy.
    Like Dr. Atran says, you cannot stop humans from being religious— so exploit religious capacity. Bricolage it.
    There are a lot benevolent memes in al-Islam.
    membah, ima muslimah. so im not ideologically compromised by anglo-saxon protestant ressentiment of al-Islam.

  36. 36.

    Persia

    January 28, 2011 at 9:42 am

    @Chris: Just imagine how different the Middle East would be if we’d taken the kind of investment we made into the Shah and the Saudis and actually thrown it behind a populist, democratic government in Iran.

    Ah, but that was when we hated commies, not mooslims. Don’t you remember?

  37. 37.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 9:45 am

    @Alex S.: yet Erdogan’s AKP is both the islamic party and the pro-business party in Turkey. US strongman policy in MENA has allowed the islamists to claim the mantle of citizen rights and social justice, because America is talkin’ the talk, and not walkin’ the walk by funding oppressive regimes that will make nice with Israel.
    America is basically Israel’s bitch.
    that wont change until the demographic timer goes off.

  38. 38.

    Persia

    January 28, 2011 at 9:48 am

    Six police vans on fire in Alexandria. This is…something all right.

    Anyone who hasn’t found the Al Jazeera video feed yet– it’s here.

  39. 39.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 9:49 am

    @Ija:

    I don’t think the matoko-bot does rationality yet. They’re working on that feature for the next release. Until then, you’ll get simplistic waffle and grandiose pronouncements. This, after all, is the person who asserts that Frank Herbert was a Muslim.

  40. 40.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 9:50 am

    @Persia: what if we had gone into Iraq as real liberators instead of as missionaries with guns?
    Saddam suppressed Islam mightily…we could have used social network theory to recruit iraqi defense forces at mosques, distribute aid thru mosques, liberated clerics from Saddams political prisons, etc.
    we could have been heroes instead of goats.
    and wound up with the same result much cheaper in blood and treasure.
    Iraq is an islamic democracy. Shariah law is in the constitution, the clergy still exercise islamic jurisprudence, and act as advisors.

  41. 41.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 9:53 am

    @morzer: that has nothing to do with what i just said.
    let me repeat.

    The historical american foreign policy of supporting dictators/strongmen in the ME actually has extremely negative results for America. The oppressive regime becomes inexorably convolved with America, and by definition Israel, local oligarchs, and judeoxian style (western style) democracy, leaving radical islam to infill the oppositionary position of citizen rights and social justice.
    The islamists, like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, get to become the liberal revolutionaries, even though they may be far more repressive when they actually take power.

    This is an EMPIRICALLY sound position.
    See, the Islamic Republic of Iran.

  42. 42.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 9:53 am

    @Persia:

    Whereas now we hate Commie-Muslims, Muslim-Fascists, Liberal-Fascists, Liberal-Muslims, Commie-Liberals, Steelers fans and in general anyone who doesn’t sound as if they grew up in some Midwestern/Southern/Real American rustic dump in the 1940s. I have serious doubts that the victorious faction in Egypt is going to qualify for membership of the GOP-approved demographic, whichever side ends up in power.

  43. 43.

    Omnes Omnibus

    January 28, 2011 at 9:54 am

    @matoko_chan: A US government with those goals would not have invaded in the first place.

  44. 44.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    January 28, 2011 at 9:56 am

    It’s easy to be glib about this but it is a serious concern.

    If we didn’t have glib, all we’d talk about is how many libertarians can dance on the head of a pin. Said pin being manufactured and distributed under the best free market, zero-gubmint regulation conditions.

    Mubarak’s like so many ageing dictators, they never know how to bow out gracefully. Some things are universal.

  45. 45.

    Persia

    January 28, 2011 at 9:56 am

    @morzer: Agreed. Biden just came out saying Mubarak shouldn’t resign. I think he’s about five hours behind the headlines.

  46. 46.

    Ija

    January 28, 2011 at 9:59 am

    @morzer:

    This, after all, is the person who asserts that Frank Herbert was a Muslim.

    I might be wrong, but I think her point was that we are all born Muslim or something. So not only was Frank Herbert a Muslim, you, me and everybody else here were born as Muslim until we decided to be something else. There was a huge argument with someone about “convert” versus “revert” or something.

    At least that was the product of my last attempt to decipher matoko speak. I should just give up, it’s giving me migraines.

  47. 47.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 10:01 am

    @Persia:

    Well, that puts him about five years ahead of US foreign policy, which has consistently propped up Mubarak’s bungling regime, despite abundant evidence that Egypt was stagnant, at best, economically, and that popular anger was rising. My guess is that Biden and Obama fear the Muslim Brotherhood (which would certainly have won a genuinely democratic election in Egypt, had one been held any time in recent memory). I wish they would realize that trying to exclude Muslim “radicals” from power by propping up incompetent dictators only makes them more resentful and more radical.

  48. 48.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 10:02 am

    @morzer: in 20 years one out of 4 humans on the planet is going to be muslim.
    don’t you think we better call a truce in the Global War on Terror Islam while we can?
    we cant win, you know. EGT and population genetics are against us.
    SCIENCE and EMPIRICAL data are against us.

  49. 49.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 10:03 am

    @Ija:

    No, she actually believes that Herbert was a Muslim, based on his use of Islam in Dune. Of course, that sort of witless “autobiographical” reading also makes him a Bene Gesserit Reverend Mother, a Tleilaxu Face Dancer, and Baron Harkonnen’s male escort, but who’s counting, really?

    PS. I use MikeJ’s version of cleek’s pie filter for Chrome, and it really does make life much better. Matoko now admits to being REDACTED with every post, and the threads are much improved thereby.

  50. 50.

    Cacti

    January 28, 2011 at 10:03 am

    @Ija:

    I might be wrong, but I think her point was that we are all born Muslim or something. So not only was Frank Herbert a Muslim, you, me and everybody else here were born as Muslim until we decided to be something else.

    Interesting.

    I always thought everyone was born an atheist until a parent or some authority figure filled your impressionable young mind with religious gobbledygook.

  51. 51.

    Chris

    January 28, 2011 at 10:06 am

    @Persia:

    Oh, I remember. It’s just that Mossadegh wasn’t a commie. At worst, he was a European-style Social Democrat, and we supported quite a few of these during the Cold War. Personally, I’d say he was just doing for his country what FDR did for America.

    A moot point if you’re a Republican, for whom the Cold War wasn’t against commies but against the left in general.

  52. 52.

    Ija

    January 28, 2011 at 10:07 am

    @Cacti:

    I always thought everyone was born an atheist until a parent or some authority figure filled your impressionable young mind with religious gobbledygook.

    Yup, this.

  53. 53.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 10:08 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: what were the goals?
    as i recall, when no WMDs were found, the mission became nationbuilding.
    We wound up building an islamic nation, not a judeoxian one.
    It would have been far more efficient to promote islamic democracy, instead of judeoxian democracy.
    Promoting judeoxian democracy in MENA is doomed to fail for a variety of reasons. It cannot ever work.

  54. 54.

    Phoenician in a time of Romans

    January 28, 2011 at 10:09 am

    Oh, here’s something FASCINATING I just found.

    This is the Google cached version of a New York Times index on Mubarak, as it appeard 28 Jan 2011. It contains the following:

    Mr. Mubarak is routinely referred to as Egypt’s modern pharaoh, though usually in a cautious whisper. Government critics are routinely jailed and freedom of expression and assembly are restricted. As he prepared to visit Cairo in June 2009, President Obama signaled that while he would mention American concerns about human rights in Egypt, he would not challenge Mr. Mubarak too sharply, calling him a “force for stability and good” in the Middle East. Mr. Obama said he did not regard Mr. Mubarak as an authoritarian leader.

    And now look at the version on their website…

    Mr. Mubarak is routinely referred to as Egypt’s modern pharaoh, though usually in a cautious whisper. Government critics are routinely jailed and freedom of expression and assembly are restricted.

    In January 2011, large protests broke out across the country as thousands called for the end of Mr. Mubarak’s rule in the most serious civil unrest in recent memory.

    The protesters were mobilized largely on the Internet and energized by recent events in Tunisia, where a popular uprising earlier that month had ended the 23-year-reign of Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali, who, like Mr. Mubarak was a former military man turned autocratic ruler. The protesters in Egypt spoke of the same deep-seated frustrations of an enduring, repressive government that drove Tunisians to revolt: rampant corruption, injustice, high unemployment and the simple lack of dignity accorded them by the state.

    Mr. Mubarak’s government did not veer from a playbook they have followed through nearly three decades of one-party rule. As always, the government has responded to the unrest primarily as a security issue, largely ignoring, or dismissing, the core demands of those who have taken to the street.

    Long accustomed to an apolitical and largely apathetic public, its leadership remains convinced that Egypt is going through the sort of convulsion it has experienced — and survived — before. And because Mr. Mubarak has systematically eviscerated civil and political institutions, there is no opposition for him to negotiate with — he has created a system that allows change to come only through his party and his allies

    So they’ve updated it with current events – but they seem to have dropped something…

  55. 55.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 10:10 am

    @Ija: bzzt false. religious capacity is hardwired in homosapiens. this is documented.
    see Tomasello, Sperber, Atran, Boyer and any number of other scientific researchers.
    Atheists just have less organic religious capacity.
    there is a biological basis for all behavior.

  56. 56.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 10:14 am

    @morzer: /shrug
    old ppl will be old.
    the filters preserve the 20th century information cocoon so necessary to the aged balloonjuice commentariat.

  57. 57.

    Uloborus

    January 28, 2011 at 10:15 am

    Makoto, here is the problem:

    We know everything you’re saying already. They’re not world-shaking new truths. They’re ‘Duh, now can we get back to wondering what effect this particular uprising will have on us, Egypt, and the world?’. I swear you sound like a 19 year old libertarian who’s just discovered that people work harder with incentives.

  58. 58.

    Omnes Omnibus

    January 28, 2011 at 10:16 am

    @matoko_chan: Read the neocons to figure out what the goals were. My point was that a US government that actually sought the goals that you described would not have have invaded Iraq in the first place. Please feel free to twist this statement into a belief that I supported the invasion or the way things have played out in Iraq. The world would be a much better place if the US government had developed a sensible Middle East policy 60 years ago, but it did not and we are living with the consequences.

  59. 59.

    Chris

    January 28, 2011 at 10:17 am

    @Phoenician in a time of Romans:

    Shiiiiit…

    “Pharaoh” is a dog whistle meaning “pagan rule” (yup, Muslims know about Exodus too). Hence the guy who killed Sadat yelling “I have killed Pharaoh!” after doing the deed.

    That’s a very, very unsubtle way of calling Mubarak an apostate and an enemy of God.

  60. 60.

    ChrisB

    January 28, 2011 at 10:17 am

    As of 9:30 am EST, the BBC was saying that the report of El-Baradei being detained was a false report.

    Wouldn’t the easiest lesson for the government to learn from Iran in 2009 be to crack down hard on the protesters? That’s what I’d expect, even though the situations may be quite different.

  61. 61.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 10:17 am

    @Uloborus:

    And to be fair, amid the blindingly obvious ideas that Matoko trots out so triumphantly, there’s a high percentage of fiction/dross/self-aggrandizing-crazy-Alaskan-former-gubner-talk.

  62. 62.

    Uloborus

    January 28, 2011 at 10:22 am

    Morzer:
    Right. ’19 year old libertarian’.

  63. 63.

    Persia

    January 28, 2011 at 10:23 am

    Alexandria is in the hands of the protesters.

  64. 64.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 10:23 am

    @Chris:

    I suspect it’s more a way of calling him a tyrant who burdens his people with demands, while keeping them poor and miserable, not to mention stuck in the past. The pharoahs seem to get credit for most pre-modern events in that area of the Middle East, and so, for example, a major Roman water-tunnel/aqueduct becomes the Canal of the Pharoahs (Qanat Firaun).

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,612718,00.html

  65. 65.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 10:26 am

    @Uloborus:

    Yes and no, Matoko did go through a phase of hinting darkly at having been recruited by the government as a young secret agent, and then Assange came along, or her medication changed, and she became Super Hacker Matoko-chan, Servant of Global Revolution.

  66. 66.

    Alex S.

    January 28, 2011 at 10:29 am

    From ‘A Night in Tunisia’ to ‘Upper Egypt & Lower Egypt’.

  67. 67.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 10:31 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: /sigh

    My point was that a US government that actually sought the goals that you described

    the goal i described was democracy promotion. Bush’s exact words. judeoxian democracy promotion can never succeed in MENA, and islamic democracy promotion would have been cake. that is my point.
    just as the right cannot turn off the racism embedded in their base, protestant evangelizing and proselytizing cannot be turned off in the electoral base.

    judeoxian representative government is only ONE FORM of democracy.
    unfortunately it is the only kind americans can comprehend.
    unfortunate for these humans i guess.

  68. 68.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 10:32 am

    A thread on the Egyptian crisis seems like the appropriate place to drop this.

    (h/t AmericaBlog)

  69. 69.

    Tuttle

    January 28, 2011 at 10:36 am

    Matoko, see Jaynes. We evolved past that hardwiring a few thousand years ago. What you are seeing are the psychological remnants of the physiological basis of religion.

  70. 70.

    Phoenician in a time of Romans

    January 28, 2011 at 10:40 am

    @Chris:

    It’s not so much the dog-whistle.

    Obama was praising Mubarak back in 2009 and saying he was not authoritarian. This was not a controversial statement – meaning that the Village would not challenge it, and no other politician took exception.

    It just happened to not be true – rioters in the streets, cops firing on civilians, and cutting off the Internet would be pretty good signs of a government gone bonkers.

    So, consider, you have a statement which is not controversial but turns out to be completely false. The conventional wisdom, propagated faithfully by the New York Times, is shown to be an obvious lie.

    So the response – from one of your foremost newspapers mind – is to quietly disappear the former US stance on Mubarak from obvious view…

  71. 71.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 10:40 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: i dont understand what is soo difficult about this. as long as the US aligns itself with strongmen and tyrants, that creates an opportunity for radical islam to define itself as the party of the people, of social justice and citizen rights….as the opposition.
    the only criteria America seems to have for funding tyrants is make nice with Israel…..not, for example, let your people vote or build a social justice safety net.
    This is a CONSERVATIVE policy, ie, anti-empirical…..in that the results of this policy empirically demonstrate it FAILS EVERY TIME. The strongman is replaced by a revolutionary islamic government resulting in an islamic state that is hostile to both Israel and America.

    or an evolutionary islamic government in the case of Turkey. which is certainly hostile to the US and Israel after the flotilla.

  72. 72.

    Ija

    January 28, 2011 at 10:42 am

    Police have entered Al-Jazeera’s office in Cairo. I guess it’s just a matter of time until they start detaining journalists.

  73. 73.

    Ash Can

    January 28, 2011 at 10:42 am

    @ChrisB: From the Guardian link: “Egyptian security officials say Nobel Peace laureate Mohamed ElBaradei is under house arrest.”

  74. 74.

    Carol

    January 28, 2011 at 10:45 am

    @Persia: Six police vans on fire. It’s ON. When that happens, then the police either fight back or have given up.

    Mubarak may be living in his Swiss chalet sooner than he thinks. He’s 82, and the stress of something like this will probably kill him.

  75. 75.

    Scott P.

    January 28, 2011 at 10:46 am

    EGT and population genetics are against us.
    SCIENCE and EMPIRICAL data are against us.

    Finally, something we can agree on. Science and empirical data are definitely against you.

  76. 76.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 10:48 am

    @Tuttle: untrue.
    read something.

  77. 77.

    Ija

    January 28, 2011 at 10:48 am

    NYT also has a live blog of the protests.

  78. 78.

    Ash Can

    January 28, 2011 at 10:50 am

    @Phoenician in a time of Romans: I’d wager that lengthy periods of lack of blowups like this lull people, otherwise-brilliant national leaders included, into a false sense of this sort of thing never happening — and even never needing to happen. Yes, it’s embarrassing, and Biden saying that Mubarak shouldn’t resign is embarrassing too. The difference between now and several years earlier is that I’m far more confident that this administration can avoid stepping in and making the situation FUBAR.

  79. 79.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 10:53 am

    @Phoenician in a time of Romans:

    I suspect that Mubarak’s constant accomodation of Israel has quite a bit to do with how his policy is perceived in the Village. If Egypt goes democratic, or even Islamist, and turns away from appeasing Israel, that’s going to have a big impact on the region. In some ways, the neocons are caught between two positions here: regime change to democracy ought to be something they approve of, but then anything that might threaten Israel is supposed to be evil. My bet is that they’ll decide that regime change is bad in this case, and that Mubarak really was legitimately elected by some magical electoral alchemy. Something along the lines of “Lower Egyptians count as 3/5 of a person”, perhaps. Doubtless the Founding Fathers put it in the Constitution, somewhere in the fine print.

  80. 80.

    Persia

    January 28, 2011 at 10:55 am

    @Carol: Curfew’s supposed to start in five minutes. Ayman Mohyeldin (Al-Jazeera, Cairo) says the police are in their building and they’ll try to stay on air as long as possible.

    Oh, and Mubarak’s supposed to be speaking.

  81. 81.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 10:56 am

    5:03 pm – Al Jazeera’s Rawya Rageh reports some extraordinary events in Alexandria: Protesters, who often outnumber police, have “arrested” police officers and beat some of them with their own batons. Police without their gear are left alone, those in their gear are confronted. Protesters are also setting security vehicles on fire.

    Also too:

    4:36 pm – Suez remains the day’s biggest flashpoint. Crowds look enormous there, and at least one person has reportedly died, his body carried through the street by protesters, according to Al Jazeera’s Jamal Elshayyal.
    __
    Protesters there also set at least one security vehicle on fire:

    Also also too:

    5:36 pm – No update on what security forces are doing in the building housing our bureau, but Al Jazeera’s Ayman Mohyeldin keeps broadcasting. On the streets, as if on cue, Cairenes are gathering on once-busy thoroughfares for evening prayers.

    Curfew supposed to go into effect in about 3 minutes….

  82. 82.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 10:58 am

    Things getting interesting real fast:

    5:55 pm – CNN reports that president Hosni Mubarak will speak “soon.” He has been completely silent since protests began four days ago.
    __
    5:50 pm – Al Jazeera’s Ayman Mohyeldin is watching protesters gathered on the street outside our bureau, chanting that they want to live in “dignity and peace.” Meanwhile, we hear police are approaching the front door of our office.

  83. 83.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 10:59 am

    @Cacti:

    I always thought everyone was born an atheist until a parent or some authority figure filled your impressionable young mind with religious gobbledygook.

    This is clearly someone who is not a parent.

    No. No. Not even close.

  84. 84.

    Omnes Omnibus

    January 28, 2011 at 11:01 am

    @matoko_chan: Bush said a lot of things. If you believe that democracy promotion was really one of the Bush administration goals for the invasion of Iraq, you are even more confused than I thought you were. Are you familiar with the concept of a pretext?

  85. 85.

    Ija

    January 28, 2011 at 11:02 am

    @Poopyman:

    4:36 pm – Suez remains the day’s biggest flashpoint. Crowds look enormous there, and at least one person has reportedly died, his body carried through the street by protesters, according to Al Jazeera’s Jamal Elshayyal. Protesters there also set at least one security vehicle on fire:

    Ahh this is not good. There’s going to be some a-hole tomorrow talking about how BOTH SIDES DO IT, and the protesters are equally as guilty as the security forces for the violence.

  86. 86.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 11:02 am

    @matoko_chan:

    Atheists just have less organic religious capacity.

    Or, having become enraged at their parents, Sunday school teachers, and the nuns at their high school, find some other outlet for their impetus toward faith.

    Christopher Hitchens’ eyes are on fire like the most devout Roman priest.

  87. 87.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 11:04 am

    Quite a nice article by Robert Fisk on Mubarak’s Egypt:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/egyptians-prepare-for-life-after-mubarak-2060150.html

    So here comes the latest Egyptian joke about 82-year-old President Hosni Mubarak. The president, a keen squash player – how else could he keep his jet-black hair? – calls up the sheikh of Al-Azhar, the highest Sunni Muslim cleric in the land, to ask if there are squash courts in heaven. The sheikh asks for a couple of days to consult the Almighty. Two days later, he calls Mr Mubarak back. “There’s good news and bad news,” he says. Give me the good news, snaps Mr Mubarak. “Well,” says the sheikh, “there are lots of squash courts in heaven.” And the bad news, asks the president? “You have a match there in two weeks’ time!”

    Fisk has a more recent article here:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-egypts-day-of-reckoning-2196751.html

    But all the Americans seem able to offer Mubarak is a suggestion of reforms – something Egyptians have heard many times before. It’s not the first time that violence has come to Egypt’s streets, of course. In 1977, there were mass food riots – I was in Cairo at the time and there were many angry, starving people – but the Sadat government managed to control the people by lowering food prices and by imprisonment and torture. There have been police mutinies before – one ruthlessly suppressed by Mubarak himself. But this is something new.

  88. 88.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 11:06 am

    @ChrisB:

    Wouldn’t the easiest lesson for the government to learn from Iran in 2009 be to crack down hard on the protesters?

    The Iranian regime had broad backing from something like half the population of Iran. “Red Iranians,” who thought Ahmedinejad seemed like the sort of guy they could drink a beer eat a goat with, weren’t too keen on those uppity, westernized, over-educated urban elites marching in the streets.

    From what I’ve read about the uprisings in Egypt, this is a much broader movement.

  89. 89.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 11:08 am

    An 11:03 comment:

    Protesters have begun heading to 6th of October bridge in Cairo, defying a government curfew that went into effect three minutes ago.

    This can’t end well ….

    ETA:

    Egyptian state television reports that president Mubarak has ordered the military to reinforce state security during the curfew tonight. But we still have not heard from Mubarak himself.

  90. 90.

    Carol

    January 28, 2011 at 11:15 am

    @Carol: So he has two choices, flee, and at least spend his final days before he dies in bed, or wait until the rioters get to the palace and kill him. He’s too old to mount a counter-revolution, and he’s too solitary too.

    Shah of Iran, 2.0

    This is 1989, folks. When the fires cool, the world will look a lot different than before. The fear of terrorism from the Middle East will fade like the fear of Communism did in 1989.

  91. 91.

    Alex S.

    January 28, 2011 at 11:15 am

    @morzer:

    Interesting. Back in 1977, rising food prices triggered these riots. And at the moment, we are in a phase of rising food prices again:

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/01/15/earlyshow/saturday/main7249451.shtml

    Edit: The article says that “freak weather” is to blame. Is it weather or climate change?

  92. 92.

    Akak

    January 28, 2011 at 11:15 am

    Just wanted to point out that the “pharaoh” reference isn’t so mug to pagan times but to Mubarak as a great oppressor, signifying him as very cruel and heartless ruler.
    Is cal even an ordinary person, might

  93. 93.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 11:16 am

    matako,

    There is no such thing as “Islamic democracy” or “Judeoxian democracy.” There is only democracy, which is universal, or the lack thereof. Of course, no system is every just pure democracy, and other values are present as well, alongside democracy.

    Bush’s problem wasn’t that he was pushing “Judeoxian democracy” instead of “Islamic democracy.” His problem was that he was pushing the installation of strongman rule under Ahmed Chalabi, not democracy. It took Sistani’s threat to turn every Shiite in Iraq out in the streets to even get Bush to agree to population elections.

    “Spreading democracy” was just an excuse they settled on once the WMD and al Qaeda-ties scares became untenable.

  94. 94.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 11:18 am

    @joe from Lowell:

    Better not to mention the non-Christian and non-Islamic Greeks of Athens during the Classical Period either. Too much reality would probably cause matoko-chan’s gears to seize up once and for all.

  95. 95.

    Phoenician in a time of Romans

    January 28, 2011 at 11:19 am

    @Ash Can:

    Yes, it’s embarrassing, but it’s embarrassing to the Village rather than Obama per se, and so the NYT hides that embarrassment. That’s the point – it demonstrates the Village, that you don’t have a free press, but an organ to faithfully trasmit the conventional wisdom.

  96. 96.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 11:20 am

    @Alex S.:

    Well, an increased incidence of “freak events” is baked into the predictions for what global warming will do and has been doing to us. Not to mention a significant shift in the timing of the seasons relative to the calendar.

  97. 97.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 11:28 am

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,742186,00.html

    Israel is usually a country where politicians have an opinion on any topic, and vociferously so. But in recent days, Israel’s leadership has been unusually silent on a certain question. No one, it seems, is willing to make an official comment on the ongoing unrest in Egypt, where protesters have been holding anti-government rallies. It’s not because Israel does not care about the riots ravaging its southern neighbor — on the contrary, Israeli news channels, normally prone to parochialism, have been closely following recent events in the Arab world, from Tunisia to Lebanon.
    Radio, television and newspapers constantly report the courage of the demonstrators in the streets of Cairo, not only relishing the historic spectacle, but openly expressing sympathy with Egypt’s struggle for democracy.
    But the Israeli government is keeping quiet. “We are closely monitoring the events, but we do not interfere in the internal affairs of a neighboring state,” was the curt answer from the Israeli Foreign Ministry to requests for comments.

  98. 98.

    Alex S.

    January 28, 2011 at 11:32 am

    The Guardian liveticker tells me that the regime won’t survive this night.

    @morzer:

    I was just a little annoyed because “weather” implies that there are just a few coincidences that will go away, but if it’s an indication of climate change, we will have consistently higher food prices and consistently lower political stability.

  99. 99.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 11:32 am

    @joe from Lowell: no. more horses mouth

    “The mistaken mission creep in Afghanistan during the Bush years was moving from counterterrorism after 9/11 — to destroy Al Qaeda — to nation building and the objective of implanting Western-style democracy,” said Robert Blackwill, who coordinated the policy for Mr. Bush at the National Security Council.

    Westernstyle democracy is judeoxian democracy.

    democracy defn. government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.

    Iraq is an islamic democracy. In islamic states, the clergy ARE the lawyers. The elected representatives are also clerics, the major political parties are religious, the constitution incorporates shariah law, and islamic jurisprudence trumps secular law if there is a conflict.
    It is still a democracy.

  100. 100.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 11:35 am

    @Alex S.:

    Right, plus there’s the usual crazy right-wing pressure to report it as freak weather, rather than part of an ongoing and terrifying pattern.

  101. 101.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 11:39 am

    @joe from Lowell: possibly. Hitchens evangelizes atheism, just like Dawkins.
    but consider conspiracy theory. it is hardly an evolutionary advantage, yet it strongly persists in the population. religious genetic tendency was a fitness advantage in the EEA (environment of evolutionary adaptation), because membership in the religious memetic tribe increased the individuals chances of survival and reproduction.
    some sociobiologists believe conspiracy theory is a spandrel of religious belief.
    i myself am agnostic on that.

  102. 102.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 11:46 am

    @matoko_chan: Why are you quoting me a piece about Afghanistan in response to a comment about Iraq?

    Why are you claiming that something the subject describes as “mission creep” was the initial impetus for an invasion?

    Why are you treating a a Bush administration’s official’s opinion about the nature of democracy as something authoritative?

    In islamic states, the clergy ARE the lawyers.

    You really don’t know what you’re talking about. In Pakistan, the democratic uprising that drove out Musharrif was led by lawyers, who were most certainly not clergy.

    The elected representatives are also clerics

    Except when they’re not, such as most of the elected representatives in Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia, and Lebanon.

    the constitution incorporates shariah law, and islamic jurisprudence trumps secular law if there is a conflict

    Except when they don’t, like in Turkey and Lebanon.

    I think it’s a little presumptuous of you to tell the people in Islamic countries what their democracy has to be.

  103. 103.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 11:46 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: the Bush Doctrine.

    the United States should depose foreign regimes that represented a potential or perceived threat to the security of the United States, even if that threat was not immediate; a policy of spreading democracy around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a strategy for combating terrorism; and a willingness to unilaterally pursue U.S. military interests.[3][4][5] Some of these policies were codified in a National Security Council text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on September 20, 2002.[

    COIN is practiced to this day, and COIN is just the Bush Doctrine cut down to village size.

    democracy promotion, implanting westernstyle democracy, oilspot, standing up westernstyle democracy, all amount to the same thing.
    proselytizing judeoxian democracy and western culture.
    missionaries with guns.

  104. 104.

    Poopyman

    January 28, 2011 at 11:48 am

    Life During Wartime:

    6:38 pm – It’s getting harder and harder to get good pictures out of Cairo – darkness has set in, and smoke from tear gas and fires is clouding the already sooty air of Egypt’s vast metropolis.

  105. 105.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 11:49 am

    @matoko_chan:

    i myself am agnostic on that.

    giggle.

  106. 106.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 11:50 am

    @joe from Lowell: the AKP is the party in power in Turkey, and the AKP is the islamic party. Hizb’ has power now in Lebanon. Hizb’ is definitely an islamic party.

    the constitution incorporates shariah law, and islamic jurisprudence trumps secular law if there is a conflict

    In Iraq. this is true. Iraq is an islamic democracy. The rule of law is the rule of islamic law.
    Does that help?

  107. 107.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 11:52 am

    @matoko_chan: I think you should consider the possibility that the Bush administration used the term “democracy” as a synonym for “American influence,” as opposed to expressing a principled support for people power.

    After all, did you ever see even the slightest indication that the Bush administration was trying to spread democracy to allied countries that had a lot of terrorism, like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, or Musharrif’s Pakistan?

  108. 108.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 11:52 am

    @joe from Lowell:

    Why are you quoting me a piece about Afghanistan in response to a comment about Iraq?

    that was in response to your assertion that there is only one kind of democracy.

  109. 109.

    THE

    January 28, 2011 at 11:54 am

    matoko I have a comment in moderation at your Sufi blog. Please rescue.

  110. 110.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 11:56 am

    @matoko_chan:

    the AKP is the party in power in Turkey

    It is now, and the party they replaced, which was in power for decades of Turkey’s democratic history, was so secular that they banned headscarfs in parliament.

    Point?

    Hizb’ has power now in Lebanon.

    For the last couple of weeks. Point?

    In Iraq. this is true. Iraq is an islamic democracy. The rule of law is the rule of islamic law.

    Yup, in Iraq. As opposed to Turkey, or Lebanon. As it turns out, not every Muslim country is the same, and not every Muslim has the same ambitions for their country.

  111. 111.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 11:58 am

    @joe from Lowell:

    I think you should consider the possibility that the Bush administration used the term “democracy” as a synonym for “American influence,” as opposed to expressing a principled support for people power

    .irrelevent.
    Some of these policies were codified in a National Security Council text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on September 20, 2002.[
    i have no clue about what that fucking WEC retard was actually thinking. Probably some sort of Gog-Magog biblical fantasy.
    All i can cite is THE POLICIES HE PUT INTO PRACTICE AND CODIFIED AS NATIONAL “DEFENSE”.

  112. 112.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 12:00 pm

    @matoko_chan:

    that was in response to your assertion that there is only one kind of democracy.

    Then you are even more deeply confused than I thought. Not only are you in the wrong country, but you utterly misunderstood my point, having drawn a blank on

    There is only democracy, which is universal, or the lack thereof. Of course, no system is every just pure democracy, and other values are present as well, alongside democracy.

    When the same religious values are present under Islamic democracy and Islamic dictatorship, and Islamic monarchy, the those religious values are not part of the democracy. They are alongside it.

  113. 113.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 12:01 pm

    @joe from Lowell:

    decades of Turkey’s democratic history

    retard.
    Ataturk was a dictator who was replaced by a military junta.
    Turkey was not a democracy.
    We are seeing 90 years of a Kemalist dictatorship evolving to an islamic democracy.

  114. 114.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    @matoko_chan:

    Some of these policies were codified in a National Security Council text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on September 20, 2002.[
    i have no clue about what that fucking WEC retard was actually thinking.

    Then you should stop asserting that the administration was committed to the promotion of democracy qua democracy on principle, since you acknowledge that you don’t actually know what their thinking.

  115. 115.

    The Sheriff's A Ni-

    January 28, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    @Alex S.: NDP headquarters burning and Mubarak an hour late now for his speech. Its pretty much looking like the end of the beginning.

  116. 116.

    joe from Lowell

    January 28, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    @matoko_chan:

    retard.

    This debate is not going well for you, is it? Getting a little hot under the collar?

    Turkey was not a democracy….90 years of a Kemalist dictatorship

    You haven’t the foggiest idea what you’re talking about. You’re assuming facts to be true or false based on their conformity to your narrative.

    I’m done with you now. You’re useless once you’ve reached this meltdown mode.

  117. 117.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    @joe from Lowell: still false. in an islamic democracy the people chose islamic representatives by voting.
    we do not have a “pure” democracy in the US.
    One major political party is wholly religious, and has the religious doctrine of ensoulment as part of the party platform, and had that doctrine as the law of the land.
    religious doctrine encoded as law is shariah.
    :)

  118. 118.

    Church Lady

    January 28, 2011 at 12:07 pm

    I was in Egypt last March, going to both Cairo and Alexandria. The grinding poverty one sees in Cairo was startling after having been in Alexandria first.

    What I noticed first was the vast number of buildings that didn’t have windows or had re-bar sticking up out of the rooftops. Our host explained that in Egypt, the owners of property don’t have to pay taxes until the property is completely built. By leaving out a window or two, or having a roof line look like an additional story is to be added, the owner avoids paying taxes. Our host said very few people in Cairo actually pay property taxes as a result.

    The other thing that stood out was the sheer amount of garbage in the streets and the canals that snake through the city. In the past, garbage pickup was included with utilities, but within the past few years, garbage pickup became a separate bill and, given the poverty in the City, many cannot afford to pay for garbage pickup. Instead, they just dump their garbage in on the street or in a nearby canal.

    Unemployment in Egypt is pretty high, and it was easy to see it on the streets of the city. Men were sitting in chairs on sidewalks, just watching the traffic go by, looking bored out of their minds. Many of them were in groups, surrounding a hookah, getting stoned on hash.

    If I had to live in that hellhole, I’d be rioting too.

  119. 119.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 12:09 pm

    @joe from Lowell: Turkey was not a democracy under Ataturk. He was a dictator.
    read a history book.
    neither was Turkey a democracy under the military junta that succeeded him.
    unless your definition of democracy is very strange indeed.
    au contraire, this is going well for me.
    soon you will pie me because i threaten to penetrate your info-cocoon with my truth arrows.

  120. 120.

    matoko_chan

    January 28, 2011 at 12:14 pm

    @joe from Lowell:

    Then you should stop asserting that the administration was committed to the promotion of democracy qua democracy on principle, since you acknowledge that you don’t actually know what their thinking.

    Im citing PRACTICE and IMPLEMENTATION.
    I can state that Bush was simply incredibly stupid.
    Democracy promotion in majority muslim nations can never result in “implanting western-style democracy”.
    Because when muslims are democratically empowered to vote, they vote for more Islam, not less, and they NEVER vote for judeoxian/westernstyle democracy.
    QED

  121. 121.

    morzer

    January 28, 2011 at 12:17 pm

    @joe from Lowell:

    I am developing a theory that “matoko-chan” is just Conor Friedersdorf attempting to be hip and trendy, rather than permanently 55 and sexually unenthusiastic.

  122. 122.

    Peter

    January 28, 2011 at 12:32 pm

    Hang on, Matoko, weren’t you professing just the other week to belong to some sci-fi religion? Did you have a conversion experience, or am I remembering wrong?

  123. 123.

    Jamie

    January 28, 2011 at 12:55 pm

    http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/Send-The-Marines-lyrics-Tom-Lehrer/8BAC8D084920F0D348256A7D00258ABE

    On things that never change

  124. 124.

    Phoenician in a time of Romans

    January 28, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    @morzer:

    But the Israeli government is keeping quiet. “We are closely monitoring the events, but we do not interfere in the internal affairs of a neighboring state,” was the curt answer from the Israeli Foreign Ministry to requests for comments.

    Bwahahahahahahah!

    Oh God, oh God – Jewish comedy at its finest!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by HinTN (5/22/25)

Recent Comments

  • JML on House Bill Passes (Open Thread) (May 22, 2025 @ 9:56am)
  • the pollyanna from hell on One Big Bad Bill and the ACA (May 22, 2025 @ 9:55am)
  • Betsy on One Big Bad Bill and the ACA (May 22, 2025 @ 9:55am)
  • Lyrebird on House Bill Passes (Open Thread) (May 22, 2025 @ 9:55am)
  • Manyakitty on Wednesday Night Open Thread (May 22, 2025 @ 9:54am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!